0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views3 pages

Defining Asset Management Roles

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views3 pages

Defining Asset Management Roles

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Integrating Asset Management Roles in your organization

December 18, 2017


Diederik van Leeuwen, MSc.

Asset Management Roles


In every organization many departments and employees are involved in (parts of) Asset Management.
In practice, we have many expectations and assumptions regarding what everyone's contribution to
Asset Management is. It is not always clear who is responsible for what. As a result, several
departments or employees sometimes feel responsible for the same activity. Or they assume that
somebody else takes care of it. In order to avoid unnecessary waste of time and energy, it is better to
define sharply the Asset Management Roles with associated tasks, responsibilities and mandate.
Furthermore, we could link these roles to functions, job descriptions and competence profiles, so that
we work in the line of sight. The relationship between Asset Management Roles and position within the
Asset Management System is represented in the figure below.

Why? strategy
AO Asset performance Asset Asset provision
Owner
tactics &
What? life cycle mgt.
line of sight

AM
Asset Asset Asset
Manager User
value
When? planning & control

Service
SP AU Provider
execution of life cycle activities Asset care Asset operation
Identify the Operate and
need Maintain

How?
Create or Dispose
Acquire and/or
Replace AM system

At strategic level top management make decisions about the future of the organization. We’ll find at
this level the common issues such as vision, mission, goals and framework, coordination with
stakeholders, the License to Operate and the organization's strategic plan. This is mainly about Why?
and is input for the Asset Management System of the organization. Top management act on behalf of
the organization and its shareholders as the owner of the assets. The Asset Owner (AO) decides
about the acquisition of new assets and the disposal of superfluous assets and thus deals with the
investments. The Asset Owner also establishes the required budget for operation and maintenance.
Top management could delegate the ownership to for example a policy department or the Plant
Manager, if applicable.

The Asset Manager (AM) manages the assets within the triangle Performance - Risks - Whole Life
Costs and we’ll find this role on tactical level of the organization. The Asset Manager determines the
What?; what needs to be done to achieve the desired results in the above mentioned Asset
Management Triangle. The Asset Manager is one of the most important roles within Asset
Management and connects the strategic level with the operational level of the organization. Elements
such as the (strategic) asset management plan, a long-term investment and maintenance plan and the
maintenance strategy are put together by the Asset Manager. The Asset Manager is usually active in a
separate Asset Management department, but sometimes also within the Maintenance department or
even Operations & Maintenance department. If the role of the Asset Manager is fulfilled by an external
party, we also call this a Managing Agent.

At low tactical level, the organization's workflow is regulated, both for Operations and Maintenance.
This is the When?. The planning and control function includes, among other things, the preparation
and planning of operations and maintenance, but also the supervision of the maintenance execution
and the inspection of the condition of the assets. We perform the life-cycle activities (engineering,
operations, execution of maintenance, etc.) at operational level within the organization, the How?.
Planned and unscheduled maintenance and the realization of the production schedule is the focal
point here.

The low tactical level and the operational level are represented by two roles: the Service Provider (SP)
and the Asset User (AU). The Service Provider arranges the planning & control of the construction and
maintenance of the assets, carries out the engineering, maintains the assets and supplies related
services. The Asset User organizes the day-to-day operations. Both roles work together intensively to
carry out the life cycle activities as efficiently as possible, so that the operational plan is achieved. In
practice, the role of the Asset User is usually performed by the Operations department. The Service
Provider can be found both in the internal Maintenance department and outside the organization in the
form of an external contractor. We often see a mixture of contracting and outsourcing at this level,
potentially in combination with a Managing Agent.

To summarize: the Asset Owner provides the assets (Asset Provision), with which the Asset User can
achieve the production targets (Asset Operation). The assets are maintained by the Service Provider
(Asset Care) and the Asset Manager realizes and monitors and reports the long-term Asset
Performance, so that a contribution is made to the organizational objectives.

Relating Asset Management Roles to functions and competences


It is important that it is clear who is responsible for which role, what activities are involved, what the
boundaries are, what information must be exchanged and that the associated mandates are well
organized. Communication must be unambiguous. The ISO 55001 standard for “good Asset
Management practice” specifies that "Top management shall ensure that the responsibilities and
authorities for relevant roles are assigned and communicated within the organization"1. You can use
methodologies such as the RASCI responsibility matrix to properly document this for your organization
and secure it within your Quality Management System. If desired, in- and output could be specified by
means of Service Level Agreements, which will certainly be useful in the case of external parties.

In order to make it work, we link roles to (existing) functions. In this way you can fulfill a certain role as
part of your job, in whole or in part. For example, the Production Manager could also have the role of
Asset User. However, the Production Manager function is broader than the role of Asset User only.
The Head of Asset Management may fulfill partly the Asset Manager role, e.g. approving an asset
management plan. A function can also completely merge into a role, for example the function of Asset
Manager in the role of Asset Manager.

You can use the so-called Competence Framework of the IAM2 to make the roles specific to your
organization and to link the roles to functions and job descriptions 3. The Competence Framework
"…describes what people are working in Asset Management and what they know and understand. It is
a tool that organizations, managers and individuals can use in numerous ways including in Training
Needs Analysis, Recruitment and Selection, Career Planning, Continuing Professional Development
and Workforce Management "4.

ISO 55002 indicates that "the organization must determine the competences required for all asset
management roles and responsibilities, knowledge, understanding, skills and experience needed to
fulfill them. The organization should map its current competences to its required competences to
determine any gaps"5. The result will then be part of the strategic asset management plan or the
underlying asset management plans.

1
ISO 55001 (2014), section 5.3
2
IAM = Institute of Asset Management, [Link]
3
The IAM Competences Framework, part 1 & 2, version 3.0 June 2014
4
[Link]/CF
5
ISO 55002 (2014), section 7.2.2
In whatever way you organize the Asset Management Roles, employees functioning in a role require
specific competences, certain experience and trust that everyone acts in a role-based manner.
Certainly during the implementation of Asset Management, we often see that employees have to start
working in a new position and / or role. This sometimes requires different competences, so that
employees have to start developing these competences. For example, directing instead of doing it
yourself, thinking in terms of lifespan or risk, managing contractors and transparent and numerical
substantiation of scenarios. That is why this topic also touches on aspects like leadership and cultural
change within the organization. New methods and responsibilities do not automatically settle within the
organization, it requires time and repeated attention and rigorous management with a careful eye for
the possibilities but also imperfections of our employees. Therefore, the implementation of Asset
Management is not a sequential implementation of methodologies but a change management
process.

Want to know more? Get into touch via the IES office. See our website [Link] for more
information.

You might also like