COMPOUND ISSUE REGISTER
Compound Opening stock Returned in Gross wt Checked
Date Shift M/c No. Part No. Issued by (Name) Batch No. RAR Issued in kg Remarks
code @ molding kg PDS wt Act wt by sup
Note-
1. Issue full compound batch as per shift requirement (as per RAR) and at the samed time return balance compound batch for compression molding machine. Example- Batch wt is 65 kg and required qty is 25 kg per shift
then issue full 65 kg batch and return balanced 40 kg immediately at the same time. Again issue this balanced full batch of 40 kg which is returned last time and return balanced 15 kg at the same time (because per shift
requirement is 25 kg). Next time issue this full balnced 15 kg and after consumption of this full 15 kg agin issue next batch as per above method.
2. Ensure required rubber wt per shot should be covered in polythene bag to avoid the missing of cut pieces.
3. Verify the loading weight of 05 samples during issuing of compound batch on compression molding machine. Write the actual observed loading wt on the polythene bag or on compound after verification
4. Check the gross loading weight of running mold physically after compound issued on machine. If batch issued 02 times on the same machine then not need to check the gross wt twice. Pupose is to check the loading
wt once per day for verification.
5. Supervisor should verify at least 3 samples for loading weight verification.
6. Highlight immedately if actual loading wt is observed more than PDS
Issuer sign after reading the above mentioned instructions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Daily Plan Vs Act with reasons
Downtime/Utilization with comments
Tab vs SAP downtime
Skill Matrix
Evolve report
Rack material & its inventory
Patrolling insp checking
All group FOC/LOC after mold change & file maintaining
Actual Purging checking of all shift & entry in SAP
Gross loading weigt verifiactaion is real or not
Compound issue/ return phy vs SAP
Sup declared prod vs Act insp difference should be zero
SFG1 inventory
Act rej vs SAP rej verification
Metal part verification SAP vs Act & during issuing
Mold tracker updation
Less cavity daily status
Weekly compound stock taking
Monthly stationary requirement
Shiftwise manpower utilization
First off / Mold/ B/D softwareupdate
Tool stock (drillmc,drillbit,shaft,pencil grinder, blade, handles, buffing wheel, punching bit & holder
Rubber consumption Bom vs SAP checking
Manpower allocation checking shiftwise
Attendence report
Prod vs Act verification by sup
PSA in up position & no strip hanging if machines not running
Process flow & 1S-2S on all machines
Postcuring
Online finishing/ Rej marking/ Date shift identification
Monthly record storage (FOC/LOC,patrolling, hourly report)
ZF bond test parts offered to QA
Non running material return & should not laying shop fllor
Daily pening material status
No batch issue without SFG2 label
Ravi
Ravi
All sup at the end of shift through msg
Anil
Ravi
Nitya
Nitya
Anil
Jayanta
Shubham
Shubham
Jayanta
Vishal
Pravas
Vishal
Jayanta
3rd shift sup
Vishal
resp sup
sup
Vishal
vishal
Ravi
All sup at the end of shift
All sup
All sup
All sup
Offline insp
Ashish
Ashish
DWM
Check points Freq 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Weighing balance calibration weekly
2 Loack & key for all compression machine weekly
3 Patrolling verification Daily
4 Rubber compound issue control verification Daily
Purging/ screw leakage shift wise trend &
5 Daily
machine wise tracking & entry in SAP
6 Gross wt verification batch wise/ shot wise Daily
Rubber compound loss of Mixing loss / QA testing
7 weekly
loss
8 Less cavity data Daily
P6- issue control give & take (Not more than one
9 Daily
shift material to be issue)
10 Tool room tracker mail Tuesday
11 Inventory of sfg1 Daily
12 Tab vs SAP downtime verification weekly
13 P8 variance Jun-25 analysis Once
Plan vs Act without manpower for month
14 Once
May,Jun,Jul
15 NC closing Once
16 Tesla inprocess data for 02 year Once
DWM
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31