0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views2 pages

Antiragging Affidavit for Students

The document contains an antiragging affidavit from a student, Shravani Yogesh Shiva, and an undertaking from her parent, Yogesh Raghunath Shiva, both acknowledging the UGC regulations on ragging in higher educational institutions. They affirm their understanding of the regulations, commit to not engaging in ragging, and acknowledge the consequences of violating these rules. Both declarations emphasize the importance of maintaining a ragging-free environment and the potential repercussions for false declarations.

Uploaded by

shravani shiva
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views2 pages

Antiragging Affidavit for Students

The document contains an antiragging affidavit from a student, Shravani Yogesh Shiva, and an undertaking from her parent, Yogesh Raghunath Shiva, both acknowledging the UGC regulations on ragging in higher educational institutions. They affirm their understanding of the regulations, commit to not engaging in ragging, and acknowledge the consequences of violating these rules. Both declarations emphasize the importance of maintaining a ragging-free environment and the potential repercussions for false declarations.

Uploaded by

shravani shiva
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Reference Number 4629598

ANTIRAGGING AFFIDAVIT BY THE STUDENT

1. I, Shravani Yogesh Shiva s/o - d/o Mr./Mrs./Ms Yogesh Raghunath Shiva , having been
admitted to Dr. D.Y Patil Pratishathans College of Architecture , have received a copy of the
UGC regulations on Curbing the menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions, 2009,
(hereinafter called the “Regulations”) carefully read and fully understood the provisions
contained in the said Regulations.

2. I have, in particular, perused clause 3 of the Regulations and am aware as to what constitutes
ragging.

3. I have also, in particular, perused clause 7 and clause 9.1 of the Regulation and am fully aware
of the penal and administrative action that is liable to be taken against me in case I am found
guilty of or abetting ragging, actively or passively, or being part of a conspiracy to promote
ragging.

4. I hereby solemnly aver and undertake that:-


I will not indulge in any behavior or act that may be constituted as ragging under clause 3 of
the Regulations.
I will not participate in or abet or propagate through any act of commission or omission that
may be constituted as ragging under clause 3 of the Regulations.

5. I hereby affirm that, if found guilty of ragging, I am liable for punishment according to clause
9.1 of the Regulations, without prejudice to any other criminal action that may be taken
against me under any penal law or any law for the time being in force.

6. I hereby declare that I have not been expelled or debarred from admission in any institution in
the country on account of being found guilty of, abetting or being part of a conspiracy to
promote, ragging; and further affirm that, in case the declaration is found to be untrue, I am
aware that my admission is liable to be cancelled.

DECLARED ON _______________________

Signature of Deponent

Shravani Yogesh Shiva

VERIFICATION

Verified that the contents of this affidavit are true to the best of my knowledge and no part of
the affidavit is false and nothing has been concealed or misstated therein.

Verified at __________________ On ______________________

Signature of Deponent ___________________________


Reference Number 4629598

UNDERTAKING BY PARENT/GUARDIAN

1. I, Mr./Mrs./Ms. Yogesh Raghunath Shiva father/ mother/ guardian of Shravani Yogesh Shiva
having been admitted to Dr. D.Y Patil Pratishathans College of Architecture , have received a
copy of the UGC regulations on Curbing the menace of Ragging in Higher Educational
Institutions, 2009, (hereinafter called the “Regulations”) carefully read and fully understood
the provisions contained in the said Regulations

2. I have, in particular, perused clause 3 of the Regulations and am aware as to what constitutes
ragging.

3. I have also, in particular, perused clause 7 and clause 9.1 of the Regulations and am fully
aware of the penal and administrative action that is liable to be taken against my ward in case
he/she is found guilty or abetting ragging, actively or passively, or being part of a conspiracy
to promote ragging.

4. I hereby solemnly aver and undertake that:-


My ward will not indulge in any behavior or act that may be constituted as ragging under
clause 3 of the Regulations.
My ward will not participate in or abet or propagate through any act of commission or
omission that may be constituted as ragging under clause 3 of the Regulations.

5. I hereby affirm that, if found guilty of ragging, my word is liable for punishment according to
clause 9.1 of the Regulations, without prejudice to any other criminal action that may be taken
against my ward under any penal law or any law for the time being in force.

6. I hereby declare that my word has not been expelled or debarred from admission in any
institution in the country on account of being found guilty of, abetting or being part of a
conspiracy to promote, ragging; and further affirm that, in case the declaration is found to be
untrue, I am aware that my admission my word is liable to be cancelled.

DECLARED ON _______________________

Signature of Deponent Address

Yogesh Raghunath Shiva MAHARASHTRA

VERIFICATION

Verified that the contents of this affidavit are true to the best of my knowledge and no part of
the affidavit is false and nothing has been concealed or misstated therein.

Verified at __________________ On ______________________

Signature of Deponent ___________________________

Common questions

Powered by AI

Parents or guardians are required to acknowledge the anti-ragging regulations and affirm their understanding of their ward's responsibilities and potential penalties. They establish a supervisory role, ensuring their ward adheres to the regulations, with implications of compliance breach resulting in consequences not only for students but also impacting parental responsibility .

The UGC regulations include clauses that address potential inaccuracies or false declarations. If a declaration is found to be untrue, it states that the student's admission is liable to be canceled. This clause ensures that all declarations are made truthfully and act as a deterrent against providing false information during admission .

Clauses 7 and 9.1 of the UGC regulations focus on the penal and administrative actions that are applicable if a student is found guilty of ragging or abetting the act. They entail that consequences include both university-level disciplinary actions and potential legal repercussions under penal laws, emphasizing zero tolerance towards ragging in educational institutions .

The regulations described in the affidavit effectively curb ragging by instilling awareness and legal consequences for misconduct. By requiring both student and parental affirmations, it creates a shared responsibility model that deters ragging through potential academic dismissal and legal repercussions. However, the effectiveness hinges on rigorous enforcement and the genuine compliance of institutions .

The parent's undertaking, as outlined in the affidavit, implies a legally binding responsibility to ensure their ward complies with UGC anti-ragging regulations. This affirms a level of parental oversight and accountability, linking the student's behavior to potential repercussions not only for the student but also for parental oversight failures, thus contributing to a collective deterrent against ragging .

If a student is found engaging in ragging, the UGC regulations stipulate potential consequences including administrative actions taken by the institution, such as suspension or expulsion. Additionally, legal actions could be pursued under prevailing penal laws. This dual consequence framework underscores the seriousness of ragging offenses .

The undertakings differ in that Shravani Yogesh Shiva pledges personal adherence to not engage in ragging activities, emphasizing individual responsibility and potential consequences she may face. The parent's undertaking echoes the same commitment but adds parental oversight and accountability. Both affirm awareness of the regulations and the penalties for violations, yet the parent emphasizes supervisory roles over the student's conduct .

Shravani Yogesh Shiva affirms responsibilities to not indulge in, abet, or propagate ragging under clause 3 of the UGC regulations. She acknowledges the possible penal and administrative actions she might face if found guilty under clause 9.1. She also declares she has never been expelled or debarred due to ragging allegations, and her admission is liable for cancellation if this declaration is untrue .

The affidavit requirement underscores a formal and legal acknowledgment from both students and their guardians of their responsibilities and liabilities under the anti-ragging regulations. This creates a binding agreement that elevates awareness, promotes accountability, and actively involves both parties in preventing ragging. It signifies a commitment to adhere to regulations and possible consequences for violations, thus acting as a deterrent to ragging .

The UGC regulations ensure accountability and compliance by mandating that students and their guardians sign affidavits acknowledging their understanding of the consequences of ragging. This formal document serves as a legal acknowledgment of the rules and the serious repercussions of non-compliance, thereby setting a deterrent against potential violations through these enforced legal pledges .

You might also like