Research Methodology Overview for PhD
Research Methodology Overview for PhD
Q. 1. What do you mean by term ‘Research’? How the everyday thinking does differs
from Research? Explain with suitable example
Answer:
MEANING OF RESEARCH:
Research in common refers to a search for knowledge. One can also define research as a
scientific and systematic search for pertinent information on a specific topic. In fact, research
is an art of scientific investigation. The Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English
lays down the meaning of research as “a careful investigation or inquiry specially through
search for new facts in any branch of knowledge.”Redman and Mory define research as a
“systematized effort to gain new knowledge.” Some people consider research as a movement,
a movement from the known to the unknown. It is actually a voyage of discovery. We all
possess the vital instinct of inquisitiveness for, when the unknown confronts us, we wonder
and our inquisitiveness makes us probe and attain full and fuller understanding of the
unknown. This inquisitiveness is the mother of all knowledge and the method, which man
employs for obtaining the knowledge of whatever the unknown, can be termed as research.
Research is an academic activity and as such the term should be used in a technical
sense. According to Clifford Woody research comprises defining and redefining problems,
formulating hypothesis or suggested solutions; collecting, organising and evaluating data;
making deductions and reaching conclusions; and at last carefully testing the conclusions to
determine whether they fit the formulating hypothesis. D. Slesinger and M. Stephenson in the
Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences define research as “the manipulation of things, concepts or
symbols for the purpose of generalising to extend, correct or verify knowledge, whether that
knowledge aids in construction of theory or in the practice of an art.”3 Research is, thus, an
original contribution to the existing stock of knowledge making for its advancement. It is the
pursuit of truth with the help of study, observation, comparison and experiment. In short, the
search for knowledge through objective and systematic method of finding solution to a
problem is research. The systematic approach concerning generalisation and the formulation
of a theory is also research. As such the term ‘research’ refers to the systematic method
consisting of enunciating the problem, formulating a hypothesis, collecting the facts or data,
analysing the facts and reaching certain conclusions either in the form of solutions(s) towards
the concerned problem or in certain generalisations for some theoretical formulation.
Research is a thing that is very different from everyday thinking. It is (or at least it should be)
much more systematic and more focused.
In research, we must clearly identify a question we are [Link] must then set up, in a very
precise and systematic way, a method for objectively answering the [Link] must do our
best to go wherever the data lead us rather than coming into our research with
preconceptions.
The study of research methodology gives the student the necessary training in gathering
material and arranging or card-indexing them, participation in the field work when required,
and also training in techniques for the collection of data appropriate to particular problems, in
the use of statistics, questionnaires and controlled experimentation and in recording evidence,
sorting it out and interpreting it. In fact, importance of knowing the methodology of research
or how research is done stems from the following considerations:
(i) For one who is preparing himself for a career of carrying out research, the importance of
knowing research methodology and research techniques is obvious since the same constitute
the tools of his trade. The knowledge of methodology provides good training specially to the
new research worker and enables him to do better research. It helps him to develop
disciplined thinking or a ‘bent of mind’ to observe the field objectively. Hence, those aspiring
for careerism in research must develop the skill of using research techniques and must
thoroughly understand the logic behind them.
(ii) Knowledge of how to do research will inculcate the ability to evaluate and use research
results with reasonable confidence. In other words, we can state that the knowledge of
research methodology is helpful in various fields such as government or business
administration, community development and social work where persons are increasingly
called upon to evaluate and use research results for action.
(iii) When one knows how research is done, then one may have the satisfaction of acquiring a
new intellectual tool which can become a way of looking at the world and of judging every
day experience. Accordingly, it enables use to make intelligent decisions concerning
problems facing us in practical life at different points of time. Thus, the knowledge of
research methodology provides tools to took at things in life objectively.
(iv) In this scientific age, all of us are in many ways consumers of research results and we can
use them intelligently provided we are able to judge the adequacy of the methods by which
they have been obtained. The knowledge of methodology helps the consumer of research
results to evaluate them and enables him to take rational decisions.
Marketing: For marketers, research is not just utilized for the purpose of learning, it is also a
vital element required to make good decisions. It is “the process or set of processes which
links the buyers and end users to the marketer through information – information employed to
identify and define marketing opportunities and problems; generate, refine, and evaluate
marketing actions; keep track of marketing performance; and enhance understanding of
marketing as a process.
Production: Research makes it possible for a business to decide on what to produce, how
much to produce, when to produce, and for whom to produce in the area of production.
Research tools are also of tremendous help in quality control, and setting up optimum
inventory level.
Strategy Making: Research can inform and help shape business strategies. Researching can
give or stimulate strategic planning. Being aware of what competition is doing and the
direction they are headed can inform present business strategies. Carrying out business
research in the area of consumer preferences unveils what products need further development
and what features makes sense to add.
Government: Research lays the foundation for all govt policies in the economic system. For
instance, research is utilized for developing the union finance and railway budget annually.
Research is employed for economic planning and ideal utilization of resources for the growth
and development of the country. Research is also required for systematic collection of details
on the economic and social structure of the country. This kind of information reveals what is
happening to the economy and what shifts are taking place.
Research Methods: All those methods which are used by the researcher during the course of
studying his research problem are termed as research methods. Since the object of research,
particularly the applied research, it to arrive at a solution for a given problem, the available
data and the unknown aspects of the problem have to be related to each other to make a
solution possible. Keeping this in view, research methods can be put into the following three
groups:
1. In the first group we include those methods which are concerned with the collection of
data. These methods will be used where the data already available are not sufficient to arrive
at the required solution;
2. The second group consists of those statistical techniques which are used for establishing
relationships between the data and the unknowns;
3. The third group consists of those methods which are used to evaluate the accuracy of the
results obtained.
From what has been stated above, we can say that research methodology has many
dimensions and research methods do constitute a part of the research methodology. The scope
of research methodology is wider than that of research methods. Thus, when we talk of
research methodology we not only talk of the research methods but also consider the logic
behind the methods we use in the context of our research study and explain why we are using
a particular method or technique and why we are not using others so that research results are
capable of being evaluated either by the researcher himself or by others. Why a research
study has been undertaken, how the research problem has been defined, in what way and why
the hypothesis has been formulated, what data have been collected and what particular
method has been adopted, why particular technique of analysing data has been used and a
host of similar other questions are usually answered when we talk of research methodology
concerning a research problem or study.
Comparison Chart
BASIS OF
RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
COMPARISON
Meaning Research Method implies the Research methodology signifies way to
methods employed by the efficiently solving research problems.
researcher to conduct research.
What is it? Behavior and instrument used in Science of understanding, how research is
the selection and construction of performed methodically.
the research technique.
Encompasses Carrying out experiment, test, Study different techniques which can be
surveys and so on. utilized in the performance of experiment,
test, surveys etc.
Comprise of Different investigation techniques. Entire strategy towards achievement of
objective.
Objective To discover solution to research To apply correct procedures so as to
problem. determine solutions.
The scope of research methodology is wider than that of research method, as the latter is the
part of the former. For understanding the research problem thoroughly, the researcher should
know the research methodology along with the methods.
In a nutshell, research method refers to the technique which can be adopted to explore the
nature of the world that surrounds us. On the contrary, research methodology is the
foundation, which helps us to understand the determinants influencing the effectiveness of the
methods applied.
Q4. What do you mean by scientific method of research? State various ways for
'Scientific Method'?
Answer:
The two terms, research and scientific method, are closely related each other.
1) The philosophy common to all research methods and techniques, although they may vary
considerably from one science to another, is usually given the name of scientific method.
2) Scientific method is the pursuit of truth as determined by logical considerations.
3) The ideal of science is to achieve a systematic interrelation of facts.
4) Scientific method attempts to achieve “this ideal by experimentation, observation, logical
arguments from accepted postulates and a combination of these three in varying proportions.
5) In scientific method, logic aids in formulating propositions explicitly and accurately so that
their possible alternatives become clear.
6) Further, logic develops the consequences of such alternatives, and when these are
compared with observable phenomena, it becomes possible for the researcher or the scientist
to state which alternative is most in harmony with the observed facts. All this is done through
experimentation and survey investigations which constitute the integral parts of scientific
method.
7) The purpose of survey investigations may also be to provide scientifically gathered
information to work as a basis for the researchers for their conclusions.
The scientific method is, thus, based on certain basic postulates which can be stated as under:
1. It relies on empirical evidence;
2. It utilizes relevant concepts;
3. It is committed to only objective considerations;
4. It presupposes ethical neutrality, i.e., it aims at nothing but making only adequate and
correct statements about population objects;
5. It results into probabilistic predictions;
6. Its methodology is made known to all concerned for critical scrutiny are for use in testing
the conclusions through replication;
7. It aims at formulating most general axioms or what can be termed as scientific theories.
Thus, “the scientific method encourages a rigorous, impersonal mode of procedure dictated
by the demands of logic and objective procedure.” Accordingly, scientific method implies an
objective, logical and systematic method, i.e., a method free from personal bias or prejudice,
a method to ascertain demonstrable qualities of a phenomenon capable of being verified, a
method wherein the researcher is guided by the rules of logical reasoning, a method wherein
the investigation proceeds in an orderly manner and a method that implies internal
consistency.
Q5. How are the various research tasks classified? Explain or what is research? What
are the various types of research? Explain.
Answer:
The model provide 8 sequential steps and each step provides various methods/
techniques/procedures and models for research . the process has similarity with journey to
somewhere.
Now suppose you want to perform a journey . Before you start , you must decide
which place you want to go to ( step I). The next step is to find the route . For finding the
route you must read and understand the map for the area of your destination. If there are more
than one route , then you must decide the shortest and safest route for your journey. You must
also decide about the budget the trip that may include things like vehicle to use, money for
petrol, drivers charges , food , toll etc you will also finalize the purpose of journey and other
things .
As the figure shows 8 operational steps of research process . These 8 steps could be
grouped in the phases
carefully and critically in terms of cost , time , researchers expertise , guides expertise and
knowledge /technology/infrastructures in the area.
In this step , we analyze the data collected in previous phase and perform data
processing on the data
Q.7. What do you mean by the term Hypothesis? What are the various sources of
hypothesis? How are the hypothesis classified?
Answer:
A hypothesis can be a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument, the
antecedent of a conditional proposition or a mere assumption or guess. The construction of
hypothesis brings clarity, specificity and focus to research problem. A hypothesis is defined
as “A hypothesis written in such a way that it can be proved or disproved by valid and
reliable data - it is in order to obtain these data that we perform our study"
A hypothesis has following characteristics:
1. A hypothesis should be simple , specific and conceptually clear.
There is no place for ambiguity in the construction of a hypothesis , as the ambiguity
will make the verification of your hypothesis almost impossible.
2. A hypothesis should be capable of verification
Method and techniques must be available for data collection and analysis. There is no
point in formulating a hypothesis it cannot be subjected to verification.
3. A hypothesis should be related to the existing body of knowledge
It is important that your hypothesis emerges from the existing body of knowledge and
that it adds to it as this is the important function of research.
4. A hypothesis should be operationalisable
This means that it can be expressed in terms that can be measured, it cannot be tested
and hence , no conclusions can be drawn.
Sources of a hypothesis are 4 p's given People , Problems , Programme and Phenomena.
Types of Hypothesis
As we can say , any assumption that you seek to validate through an inquiry is called
hypothesis. hence we can say that there should be only one type of hypothesis i.e a Research
hypothesis - the basis of your investigation . However , because of the convention in
scientific inquiries and because of the wording used in the construction of a hypothesis ,
hypothesis can be classified into several types . Broadly there are two categories of the
Hypothesis
1 Research Hypothesis
2 Alternate Hypothesis
Fig Two-by-two factorial experiment to study the relationship between MCH, NS and infant
mortality
There are several ways of formulating a hypothesis. For example: There will be no
difference in the level of infant mortality among the different treatment modalities.
The MCH and NS treatment groups will register a greater decline in infant mortality than the
only MCH treatment group, the only NS treatment group or the control group. Infant
mortality in the MCH treatment group will reach a level of 30/1000 over five years. Decline
in the infant mortality rate will be three times greater in the MCH treatment group than in the
NS group only over five years.
b) Let us take another example. Suppose you want to study the smoking pattern in a
community in relation to gender differentials. The following hypotheses could be
constructed:
There is no significant difference in the proportion of male and female smokers in the study
population.
A greater proportion of females than males are smokers in the study population.
A total of 60 per cent of females and 30 per cent of males in the study population are
smokers.
There are twice as many female smokers as male smokers in the study population.
In both sets of examples, the way the first hypothesis has been formulated indicates that there
is no difference either in the extent of the impact of different treatment modalities on the
infant mortality rate or in the proportion of male and female smokers. When you construct a
hypothesis stipulating that there is no difference between two situations, groups, outcomes, or
the prevalence of a condition or phenomenon, this is called a null hypothesis and is usually
written as H0.
The second hypothesis in each example implies that there is a difference either in the
extent of the impact of different treatment modalities on infant mortality or in the proportion
of male and female smokers among the population, though the extent of the difference is not
specified. A hypothesis in which a researcher stipulates that there will be a difference but
does not specify its magnitude is called a hypothesis of difference.
A researcher may have enough knowledge about the smoking behaviour of the
community or the treatment programme and its likely outcomes to speculate almost the exact
prevalence of the situation or the outcome of a treatment programme in quantitative units.
Examine the third hypothesis in both sets of examples: the level of infant mortality is 30/1000
and the proportion of female and male smokers is 60 and 30 per cent respectively. This type
of hypothesis is known as a hypothesis of point-prevalence.
The fourth hypothesis in both sets of examples speculates a relationship between the
impact of different combinations of MCH and NS programmes on the dependent variable
(infant mortality) or the relationship between the prevalence of a phenomenon (smoking)
among different populations (male and female). This type of hypothesis stipulates the extent
of the relationship in terms of the effect of different treatment groups on the dependent
variable (‘three times greater in the MCH treatment group than in the NS group only over
five years’) or the prevalence of a phenomenon in different population groups (‘twice as
many female as male smokers’). This type of hypothesis is called a hypothesis of association.
Answer:-
ICT tools are mainly used by researchers for its ability to ease knowledge-gathering process
and to enhance resource-development. Researcher in general value creativity and originality ,
thus the ICT tools which provide with the most open situations with great autonomy to the
researcher can really help in identifying and solving research problems in the most creative
ways.
Generally, ICT tools help researcher in the following research related tasks
identify appropriate information sources
critically analyse information
research effectively
manage information
use information to extend and communicate knowledge across subject fields
search up to ten databases and electronic resources simultaneously
receive results in a common format
link to individual databases for more specialised searching
select favourite resources and e-journals, save searches and records, and setup email
alerts.
The following are some of the useful search engines used for research activities ,
1. [Link] -lists related searches ,
2. [Link] : a multi-disciplinary search engine for academically relevant web ,
3. Bing – Microsoft’s search engine lists related searches ,
4. Google Scholar – indexes scholarly research from many journals, books, papers, etc. across
many disciplines ,and
5. Yahoo! Search – originally a Web directory, it now features a reliable search engine.
In the following three ways ICT Tools can be used by researchers for qualitative research
As a network of computers -Internet , the most popular and powerful ICT tool, breaks
all boundaries and makes physical distances between people disappear thus providing
a platform like online communities, blogs and discussions forums to reach out to
people all across the globe for collective and collaborative research with seamless
possibilities for the researcher to utilize this space particularly for collecting
information.
Data collection requires Collaboration. A word of caution to the researcher is to take care of
Intellectual property related issues in advance before using Internet and web2.0 tools for data
collection and storage . The qualitative research process starts with a Questionnaire / Survey
Design . Survey can be created using ICT tools Web, Word Processors (WP), Spreadsheets
and now most popular online tools like google-forms and [Link], and can be
distributed using email and discussion boards.
To make the research outcomes reach maximum numbers of stake holders proper planning
for printing, mailing and/or posting on community forums plus translation is required .
Making research results accessible to various audiences through website, Research Portfolio,
Newsletter, and other Community reports is now a common practice. Presenting research at
Conferences/ Seminars and thus making findings known to users should be planned. Events
happening across the globe on the theme of research can be found out easily today through
Internet.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RESEARCH:
The term problem means any process/machine that don’t work properly due to some faults
but the problems could be corrected or solved with establish procedure or method
A research problem is a statement about an area of concern, a condition to be improved, a
difficulty to be eliminated, or a troubling question that exists in scholarly literature, in theory,
or in practice that points to the need for meaningful understanding and deliberate
investigation. In some social science disciplines the research problem is typically posed in the
form of a question. A research problem does not state how to do something, offer a vague or
broad proposition, or present a value question.
Conducting research into existing solutions to the problem or similar problems is helpful to
generate workable solutions. The main criteria for judging solutions in this step is simply
whether or not they answer the problem statement with a ‘yes.’ At this point, it may also be
possible to eliminate some solutions because they do not agree with commonly held moral
and ethical guidelines. Even though not stated specifically, these guidelines are understood
and assumed to be upheld when reviewing solutions. For example, a solution to global
pollution might be to kill every human. This is obviously not a good solution even though it
would give a ‘yes’ answer to the question of "How might we minimize global air pollution
caused by humans?"
It is important to have research and logical reasons for the criteria chosen as well as
factual support for the rankings given to a particular solution for each criterion. Once the
criteria are chosen, they should be given a weighting. In most cases, all the criteria have the
same weight. However, it is possible to give other weightings to criteria so that a particular
factor is seen as more important. Many times, the cost, time to complete, or political nature of
a project is more important than other factors and so that criteria may have a higher ranking
than others used to judge. Once the criteria are chosen and weighted, all qualified solutions
must then be ranked. Two types of procedures for ranking exist. If the number of solutions is
large, usually greater than ten, an independent ranking must be conducted to narrow the
number of choices.
After selecting the best solution, it is necessary to give some thought to the way in
which it might be implemented. Giving insight into funding, potential problems with
implementing the solution, and the time frame of the solution is necessary for any workable
solution to a problem. Not all solutions can be implemented. Unforeseen problems may arise
as solutions are tested and put to work. Many times, unexpected resistance to solutions can be
encountered. Other times, unacceptable results can require that another solution be used.
Conceptual research is that related to some abstract idea(s) or theory. It is generally used by
philosophers and thinkers to develop new concepts or to reinterpret existing ones. On the
other hand, empirical research relies on experience or observation alone, often without due
regard for system and theory. It is data-based research, coming up with conclusions which are
capable of being verified by observation or experiment. We can also call it as experimental type
of research. In such a research it is necessary to get at facts firsthand, at their source, and
actively to go about doing certain things to stimulate the production of desired information.
In such a research, the researcher must first provide himself with a working hypothesis or
guess as to the probable results. He then works to get enough facts (data) to prove or disprove
his hypothesis. He then sets up experimental designs which he thinks will manipulate the
persons or the materials concerned so as to bring forth the desired information. Such research
is thus characterized by the experimenter’s control over the variables under study and his
deliberate manipulation of one of them to study its effects. Empirical research is appropriate
when proof is sought that certain variables affect other variables in some way. Evidence
gathered through experiments or empirical studies is today considered to be the most
powerful support possible for a given hypothesis.
Research can either be applied (or action) research or fundamental (to basic or pure)
research. Applied research aims at finding a solution for an immediate problem facing a society
or an industrial/business organization, whereas fundamental research is mainly concerned with
generalizations and with the formulation of a theory. Gathering knowledge for knowledge’s
sake is termed ‘pure’ or ‘basic’ research. Research concerning some natural phenomenon or
relating to pure mathematics are examples of fundamental research . Similarly, research
studies, concerning human behavior carried on with a view to make generalizations about
human behavior, are also examples of fundamental research, but research aimed at certain
conclusions facing a concrete social or business problem is an example of applied research.
Research to identify social, economic or political trends that may affect a particular institution
or the copy research (research to find out whether certain communications will be read and
understood) or the marketing research or evaluation research are examples of applied
research. Thus, the central aim of applied research is to discover a solution for some pressing
practical problem, whereas basic research is directed towards finding information that has a
broad base of applications and thus, adds to the already existing organized body of scientific
knowledge.
Research differs from everyday thinking in its systematic and focused approach. Unlike everyday thinking, which may rely on opinions and preconceived notions, research requires clearly identifying a question and setting up a precise method to answer it objectively. Researchers must follow where the data leads rather than starting with preconceptions, aiming to discover hidden truths and accumulate new knowledge .
Applied research aims to find solutions for immediate practical problems, often in business or social contexts, while fundamental research seeks to contribute to general knowledge and theory development, often without immediate practical applications. Fundamental research focuses on understanding phenomena, whereas applied research targets addressing specific issues .
Qualitative research is challenging due to its reliance on analyzing abstract qualities of human behavior rather than quantifiable measures. Implementing it requires a deep understanding of motivational nuances, and guidance from experimental psychologists is recommended to ensure accurate interpretation and data collection methods .
Empirical research is critical for hypotheses validation as it relies on firsthand data and experimental design to provide evidence for or against a hypothesis. The empirical approach allows researchers to control variables and conduct experiments to obtain repeatable and verifiable results, thereby offering strong support for scientific claims .
Control in research ensures that the relationships between variables are not influenced by external factors, allowing accurate conclusions. Rigorous research follows strict procedures to ensure results are valid and relevant. These characteristics are crucial for generating reliable and trustworthy data that can be used to build or test theories .
Knowledge of research methodology empowers consumers by enabling them to assess the adequacy and credibility of research results. This understanding allows individuals to make informed decisions by evaluating methods used in gathering data and interpreting findings, which is crucial in a scientific age where data affects many aspects of life .
Knowledge of research methodology benefits fields such as government, business administration, and social work by equipping individuals with the ability to evaluate and use research results with confidence. It fosters disciplined thinking and provides tools for objective analysis, enabling intelligent decision-making in practical life scenarios .
Inquisitiveness drives the research process by motivating individuals to explore unknowns and seek deeper understanding. This instinct fuels the curiosity necessary to question existing knowledge, leading to new discoveries and advancement in various fields. It transforms unknowns into new knowledge through systematic investigation and intellectual pursuit .
Conceptual research focuses on developing new ideas or theories and is often abstract, while empirical research is based on observation or experiments to test hypotheses. While conceptual research builds theoretical frameworks, empirical research provides evidence to support or refute these frameworks through data collection and analysis .
Disseminating research findings is essential to share knowledge with stakeholders and inform decision-making processes. Effective methods include publishing results in newsletters, websites, and journals, as well as presenting at conferences. Translation and adaptation of findings for different audiences ensure broader reach and application .