0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Advanced Data Structures Course Overview

Uploaded by

Kunal Sumuk
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Advanced Data Structures Course Overview

Uploaded by

Kunal Sumuk
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Advanced Data Structures

Course Code: PGA123 Credits: 4:0:0


Prerequisites:Nil Contact Hours: 56
Course Coordinator/s: Dr. Mohana Kumar S

Contents
UNIT-I DICTIONARIES AND HASHING
Dictionaries: Definition, Dictionary Abstract Data Type, Implementation of Dictionaries.
Hashing: Review of Hashing, Hash Function, Collision Resolution Techniques in Hashing,
Separate Chaining, Open Addressing, Linear Probing, Quadratic Probing, Double Hashing,
Rehashing, Extendible Hashing.

UNIT-II SKIP LISTS


Skip Lists: Need for Randomizing Data Structures and Algorithms, Search and Update
Operations on Skip Lists, Probabilistic Analysis of Skip Lists, Deterministic Skip Lists.

UNIT-III TREES
Trees: Binary Search Trees, AVL Trees, Red Black Trees, 2-3 Trees, B-Trees, Splay Trees

UNIT-IV TEXT PROCESSING


Text Processing: Sting Operations, Brute-Force Pattern Matching, The BoyerMoore
Algorithm, The Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithm, Standard Tries, Compressed Tries, Suffix
Tries, The Huffman Coding Algorithm, The Longest Common Subsequence Problem (LCS),
Applying Dynamic Programming to the LCS Problem.

UNIT-V COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY


Computational Geometry: One Dimensional Range Searching, Two Dimensional Range
Searching, Constructing a Priority Search Tree, Searching a Priority Search Tree, Priority
Range Trees, Quad trees, k-D Trees. Recent Trends in Hashing, Trees, and various
computational geometry methods for efficiently solving the new evolving problem.

Text Books:
1. Mark Allen Weiss, Data Structures and Algorithm Analysis in C++, 2nd Edition, Pearson,
2004.
2. M T Goodrich, Roberto Tamassia, Algorithm Design, John Wiley, 2002

References Text Book


1. Fundamentals of Computer Algorithms, Ellis Horowitz, SatrajSahani and Rajasekharam,
2nd Edition, 2009, University Press Pvt. Ltd.
2. Advanced Data Structures, Reema Thareja, S. Rama Sree, Oxford University Press, 2018
Random Process
Course Code: PGAE151 Credits: 3:0:0
Prerequisites:Nil Contact Hours: 42
Course Coordinator/s: Dr. Mohana Kumar S

Contents
Unit 1
INTRODUCTION TO PROBABILITY THEORY: Experiments, sample space, Events,
Axioms, Assigning probabilities, Joint and conditional probabilities, Baye’s Theorem,
Independence, Discrete Random Variables, Engg Example.

Unit 2
Random Variables, Distributions, Density Functions: CDF, PDF,Gaussian random variable,
Uniform Exponential, Laplace, Gamma, Erlang, Chi-Square, Raleigh, Rician and Cauchy
types of random variables.

Unit 3
OPERATIONS ON A SINGLE R V: Expected value, EV of Random variables, EV of
functions of Random variables, Central Moments, Conditional expected values.
Unit 4
Characteristic functions: Characteristic functions, Probability generating functions, Moment
generating functions, Engg applications, Scalar quantization, entropy and source coding.

Unit 5
Pairs of Random variables: Pairs of Random variables, Joint CDF, joint PDF, Joint
probability mass functions, Conditional Distribution, density and mass functions, EV
involving pairs of Random variables, Independent Random variables, Complex Random
variables, Engg Application. Definition and characterization, Mathematical tools for studying
Random Processes, Stationary and Ergodic Random processes,Properties of ACF.

Text Books
1. Shynk, John J. Probability, random variables, and random processes: theory and
signal processing applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
2. Krylov, Nikolaĭ Vladimirovich. Introduction to the theory of random processes. Vol.
43. American Mathematical Soc., 2002.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Dynamic programming applies to the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) problem by breaking it down into simpler subproblems and storing the results to avoid redundant computation. This approach involves creating a table where each cell [i][j] represents the length of LCS of substrings X[0..i] and Y[0..j]. By iteratively filling this table based on the recurrence relation that considers whether the characters in the strings match or not, dynamic programming effectively computes the solution with a time complexity of O(n*m), where n and m are the lengths of the input strings. This method significantly reduces the exponential complexity of a naive recursive approach .

Skip lists use randomization to arrange elements in multiple levels, where each element might be present multiple times in different levels with varying probabilities. This randomization effectively balances the list, leading to an average case time complexity of O(log n) for search operations. Probabilistic analysis helps in predicting the expected performance of skip lists by analyzing the likelihood of elements existing at different levels, ensuring that search operations remain efficient without the need for explicit balancing as in traditional trees .

AVL trees are self-balancing binary search trees where the balance factor (the height difference between left and right subtrees) is maintained between -1 and 1 for every node. This strict balancing ensures that the depth of the tree remains O(log n), leading to consistently fast search, insertion, and deletion operations compared to traditional binary search trees, which can degrade to O(n) operations if not balanced (e.g., in the case of inserting ordered data). The trade-off, however, is the additional time spent on rotations to maintain balance during insertions and deletions, which is generally outweighed by overall operational efficiency gains .

Solving evolving problems in computational geometry, particularly for efficient range searching, involves developing data structures that manage multi-dimensional data effectively. Strategies involve using priority search trees, quad trees, and k-D trees, which allow efficient querying by partitioning space to minimize the number of points processed. These tree structures facilitate logarithmic time complexity for insertion, deletion, and query operations. Innovations in these structures, like balancing techniques and enhancements in space reduction, ensure that as data and dimensionality grow, the computational feasibility remains practical, allowing applications in spatial databases and geographic information systems .

Stationarity in random processes implies that statistical properties like mean and variance are constant over time, providing simplification in analyzing complex signals or time series data as the dependence on time diminishes. Ergodicity means that time averages converge to ensemble averages, allowing the behavior of a single process realization over time to represent the entire process's statistical properties. These properties are crucial in engineering applications such as signal processing, where analysis and processing techniques like filtering presume stationarity or ergodicity to reconstruct or predict signals and noise effectively, ensuring stable and predictable system performance .

Red-Black trees maintain balanced tree structure, ensuring that the path from root to any leaf is no more than twice as long as any other. This is achieved through properties like: nodes are colored either red or black, the root and all leaves (NIL nodes) are black, and red nodes cannot have red children (no two red nodes can be adjacent), ensuring balance is maintained. These properties guarantee O(log n) time complexity for insertion, deletion, and search operations, making Red-Black trees particularly suitable for applications where data is frequently updated and fast access is crucial, such as in implementing associative arrays or priority queues .

Both the Boyer-Moore and Knuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP) algorithms are used for pattern matching in text processing, but they differ in approach and efficiency. The Boyer-Moore algorithm is efficient because it performs comparisons from right to left and jumps over sections of text when mismatches occur, making it faster for most practical cases with an average time complexity better than O(n). The KMP algorithm, however, preprocesses the pattern to construct a partial match table (LPS array), allowing it to skip unnecessary comparisons, making it run in O(n + m) time in the worst case. While Boyer-Moore often performs better on large texts with long patterns, KMP is more consistent across all inputs and particularly beneficial when matching patterns with repetitive sections .

Characteristic functions, which are the Fourier transforms of probability density functions (PDFs), encapsulate all statistical characteristics of random variables. They are vital in engineering applications for several reasons: they simplify the analysis of sums of independent random variables due to their multiplicative property, facilitate the transformation into other domains (e.g., systems analysis in the frequency domain), and aid in confirming convergence to normal distributions through the Central Limit Theorem. Additionally, characteristic functions provide insight into the inherent distribution properties, such as moments and dependencies, useful in communications and signal processing for identifying noise characteristics and filtering .

Gaussian random variables, characterized by a bell-shaped probability density function (PDF), have continuous values distributed symmetrically around a mean (μ) with a standard deviation (σ) that measures dispersion, fully described by their mean and variance. In contrast, uniform random variables, usually defined over a closed interval, have a constant probability for all values within the interval, lacking peaks and being completely defined by their minimum and maximum bounds with zero skewness and constant variance. These differences impact statistical modeling as Gaussian distributions model natural phenomena with central tendency and variability, whereas uniform distributions are useful for modeling scenarios with equal likelihood across outcomes, often serving as a basis for simulations .

Implementing dictionaries using hashing involves using a hash function to index entries, which allows for average-case constant time complexity for search, insertion, and deletion operations. Key differences compared to other data structures like binary search trees include this constant time complexity, which is often superior to the logarithmic complexity of balanced trees. Collision resolution is crucial because it deals with situations where multiple keys hash to the same index, and it can be handled with techniques like separate chaining and open addressing (including linear probing and double hashing).

You might also like