Alcohol Taxation in Sri Lanka Overview
Alcohol Taxation in Sri Lanka Overview
RESEARCH ON
Alcohol
Taxation
IN SRI LANKA
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
This report will focus on the taxation of locally produced and imported alcoholic
beverages and the role of taxation in determining the costs and harms associated
with alcohol consumption in Sri Lanka. For locally produced liquor, the report will
mainly focus on the excise duty imposed by the Department of Excise, while for
imported liquor, it will focus on the import duty imposed by Sri Lanka Customs.
The report will not cover aspects related to the supply of raw materials for the
production of alcohol and for industrial purposes and its taxation in Sri Lanka
(e.g., taxation of methanol, isopropyl and ethanol etc.). The report also integrates
insights gained from two Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with experts on alcohol
taxation in Sri Lanka.
The production and sale of locally produced alcoholic beverages in Sri Lanka are
mainly subjected to an excise duty. Primarily governed by the Excise Department
of Sri Lanka, the excise duties currently in place in the country are considered
a volumetric tax system (or specific tax), because the amount of excise duty
imposed is dependent on the volume of alcohol contained in the product.
Previously, alcohol in Sri Lanka was taxed under the proof litre and bulk litre
system. However, owing to its complexity, the proof litre system was abandoned
in 2017. Currently, the systems used to tax different alcoholic beverages are as
follows:
01
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
◆ Under this system, alcoholic beverages are taxed by the entire volume
of the beverage contained in the product. This system is applicable
to alcoholic beverages that contain typically low concentrations of
alcohol (5.5%-7.5%).
The current tax schedule2 for different alcoholic beverages produced in the
country is as follows:
1
See question 4 for details.
2
As at 21st February 2022
02
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Imported Liquor
The main tax imposed on imported liquor is Customs Duty which is collected by
Sri Lanka Customs (SLC). The system used to tax imported liquor is based on the
bulk litre system. Other taxes imposed on imported liquor by SLC include cess,
Ports and Airports Development Levy (PAL) and VAT.
The current tax schedule3 for different taxes administered by SLC on alcoholic
beverages imported into the country, by HS Code, is as shown in Exhibit 2.
Therefore, under this combined system the total taxes amounts to around 15% of
the sale price (assuming the sale price is a 50-60% markup from the CIF value),
plus the bulk litre amount specified in Exhibit 2.
Customs
HS Code
General
Cess7
Duty
PAL6
VAT5
Unit
Per bulk
2203 Beer made from malt 550/= 8% 10% -
litre
Source: Chapter 22, Sri Lanka Customs National Imports Tariff Guide – 2021, incorporating
amendments up to 11.03.2022
3
As at 31st March 2022 6 Calculated as CIF Value * Rate of PAL
4 For details on tariff rates for HS Codes at the 6-digit level, 7 Calculated as Quantity * unit rate of Cess levy OR
see Annex A [CIF Value in LKR + 10% of CIF Value in LKR] * Rate
5 Calculated as [CIF Value in LKR + 10% of CIF Value in of Cess Levy
LKR + Customs Duty + Cess Levy + PAL + Excise (Special 8 Some HS codes at the 6-digit level are levied a
Provisions) Duty ] * Rate of VAT Cess levy. Fur further details see Annex A
03
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Imported liquor is also subject to an excise duty, which is imposed within the
territory of Sri Lanka Customs, but collected by the Department of Excise when
such liquor is brought into the country. The system used to charge an excise
duty on imported liquor is by the bulk litre system.
04
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Exhibit 4 below summarizes the total tax income generated by the government
from alcohol and tobacco production between 2012-2020.
Exhibit 4: Total excise tax revenue from locally produced liquor and cigarettes9
In 2020, revenue from the production of alcohol declined because of bans placed
on the sale of liquor during the coronavirus pandemic-related lockdowns. The
Commissioner General of Excise claimed that, as a consequence of this, the
Department of Excise had lost an accumulated LKR 600 million per day in 202010.
On the 17th of August 2020, Verité Research filed a Right to Information request
(RTI) with the Sri Lanka Customs, requesting for information on revenue statistics
for all taxes administered and collected by Sri Lanka Customs, by product HS
Code, from January 2016 to July 2020. Exhibit 5 below summarizes the response
received from SLC for HS Codes and sub-HS Codes for 2203-2206 and 2208
9
Hard liquor & malt liquor production after 2017 is in absolute litres
10
Suresh Perera, ‘Excise Department grapples with billions of rupees in lost tax revenue’,
[Link], available at [Link]
tax-revenue/ [Last accessed 31st January 2022]
05
Exhibit 5: Total tax collected by Sri Lanka Customs from imported alcohol between 2017-2020 for HS codes at the 6-digit level (Figures in Rs.)
06
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
07
HS Code Description 2017 2018 2019 2020
2206.00.90 Other 29,480,768 62,413,134 48,290,215 9,010,091
2206.00.91 Palmyrah Toddy - - - -
2206.00.99 Other - - - 3,998,997
Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by
22.08 volume of less than 80% vol; spirits, liqueurs and other - - - -
spirituous beverages.
2208.20.00 Spirits obtained by distilling grape wine or grape marc 98,558,915 187,799,848 68,891,293 51,580,824
2208.30.00 Whiskies 675,526,928 811,550,221 875,209,786 190,046,651
Rum and other spirits obtained by distilling fermented
2208.40
sugar-cane products
2208.40.10 Rum 37,579,058 63,511,827 77,537,543 7,872,325
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Source: Information obtained through RTI request filed with Sri Lanka Customs, 17th August 2021
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
◆ The definition of ‘excisable article’ includes all types of liquor, such as, wine,
spirits, toddy, beer, and liquid consisting of or containing alcohol.15
◆ The collection of excise revenue is carried out by the Commissioner-General
of Excise in his/her capacity as the head of the Excise Department which is
the principal government agency responsible for the control and regulation
of the import, export, transport, manufacture, sale, and possession of liquor/
alcohol.16
◆ The importation of foreign liquor shall be carried out only after obtaining
a permit for the importation of foreign liquor. If foreign liquor is imported
to Sri Lanka without a permit, the Commissioner General of Excise has the
power to levy a surcharge of 3% on the CIF (Cost, Insurance, Freight) value in
addition to the excise duty, or confiscate the stocks so imported.17
11
Sections 22(1), 22(2)(b) and 22(2)(c), Excise Ordinance
12
Section 22(1)(a), Excise Ordinance
13
Section 22(1)(c), Excise Ordinance
14
Section 22(1)(d), Excise Ordinance
15
Section 2, Excise Ordinance
16
Section 7, Excise Ordinance.
17
Excise Notification, No.08/2019, [Link]
08
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
18
Section 2, Value Added Tax Act.
19
Section 10, Customs Ordinance
20
Section 14, Export Development Levy
21
Section 2, The Ports and Airports Development Act
22
Sec. 8, The Ports and Airports Development Act
09
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
10
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
11
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
As per the latest available data in 2019, Exhibit 6 below lists the total quantity
of alcohol produced for the year 2019 by alcoholic beverage. Arrack production
takes up the largest share of the industry.
Exhibit 6: Total quantity of locally produced alcohol in 2019 (In absolute litres)
Arrack 22,409,379
Wine 4,205
Sake 190,233
The total number of alcohol manufacturers in the country has varied over
the years. In Sri Lanka, the number of alcohol manufacturers differs based
on the alcoholic beverage manufactured. The market share of each alcohol
manufacturer has also varied acrossdifferent alcoholic beverages over the years.
Exhibits 7-12 detail the key manufacturers of arrack (molasses, coconut and
processed, palmyra and special arrack), country made foreign liquor, malt liquor
(beer), wine, sake and bottled toddy. It also details their market share in terms of
production of each alcoholic beverage, and the total number of litres produced
between 2014 and 2019.
12
13
Arrack Production
Exhibit 7: Manufacturers of arrack, number of litres produced and market share (%) in 2014-201923
Synergy Distillerires 104,150 0.3 34,992 0.1 34,745 0.1 47,034 0.2 61,325 0.3
Scotland Distilleries 155,265 0.4 291,608 0.6 293,280 0.6 136,515 0.6 145,236 0.6
Hingurana Distilleries 751,819 1.9 660,784 1.4 528,230 1.0 500,121 2.1 53,468 0.2
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
International Distilleries Ltd (IDL) 4,218,453 10.8 4,447,237 9.3 4,156,655 8.0 1,762,042 7.5 1,611,407 7.2
Uva Glen Company (Pvt) Ltd 129,936 0.3 162,994 0.3 187,298 0.4 126,297 0.5 107,359 0.5
Manori Lanka (pvt) Ltd 68,488 0.2 63,763 0.1 97,519 0.2 32,175 0.1 11,895 0.1
V.A. Distilleries (Pvt) Ltd 267,808 0.7 350,183 0.7 586,353 1.1 359,990 1.5 342,365 1.5
Nippon Expo Company Ltd 149,628 0.4 186,479 0.4 201,139 0.4 128,554 0.6 128,674 0.6
23
Figures for 2014-2016 are in proof litres. Figures in 2018 and 2019 are in absolute litres.
2014 2015 2016 2018 2019
Name of Manufacturer
Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity
% % % % %
(PL) (PL) (PL) (PL) (PL)
W.M Mendis and Company 1,491,077 3.8 5,019,094 10.5 5,466,856 10.5 515,558 2.2 536,715 2.4
Rockland Distilleries Ltd 2,305,449 5.9 2,317,077 4.8 2,826,533 5.4 1,247,498 5.3 1,183,017 5.3
Randiya Ltd 48,111 0.1 10,338 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 16,548 0.1
Acme Lanka Ltd 564,882 1.4 1,260,965 2.6 1,522,127 2.9 892,352 3.8 927,059 4.1
Randenigala Distilleries 226,253 0.6 85,507 0.2 137,832 0.3 70,591 0.3 82,156 0.4
Classic Distilleries Ltd 64,828 0.2 81,838 0.2 73,639 0.1 32,520 0.1 32,422 0.1
Wayamba Distilleries (Pvt) Ltd 102,049 0.3 1,808 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0
Distilleries Company Ltd Dompe - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 119,630 0.5
Royal Casks (Pvt.) Ltd. - 0.0 182,990 0.4 218,762 0.4 91,862 0.4 - 0.0
Thikkam 2,005 0.0 2,033 0.0 - 0.0 7,805 0.0 1,163 0.0
Walikamam 10,494 0.0 24,550 0.1 27,454 0.1 25,078 0.1 30,760 0.1
Varani 17,782 0.0 21,304 0.0 26,611 0.1 8,319 0.0 6,307 0.0
14
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
15
The largest manufacturers of arrack in the country over the years has been Distilleries Company Sri Lanka Ltd. The company
comprised an average of 68.6% of the market share for arrack across 2014-2016. They are followed by International Distilleries Ltd
(IDL), which has comprised an average 8.6% of the market share for the same period.
Exhibit 8: Top manufacturers of country made foreign liquor, number of litres produced and market share (%) in 2014-2019
Hingurana Distilleries 120,687 2.8 20,048 0.5 - 0.0 12,889 0.7 7,063 0.4
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
International Distilleries Ltd (IDL) 1,691,527 39.0 1,615,990 40.4 1,526,250 38.8 707,756 38.6 755,814 40.5
W.M Mendis & Company Ltd 249,354 5.7 296,226 7.4 288,205 7.3 52,396 2.9 32,372 1.7
Rockland Distilleries Ltd 1,316,244 30.3 1,262,200 31.6 1,193,597 30.3 522,576 28.5 494,376 1.7
Sri Lanka Distilleries Ltd. 20,795 0.5 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0
Beer Production
Exhibit 9: Manufacturers of beer (below and above 5%), number of litres produced and market share (%) in 2014-2019 24
The largest manufacturer of malt liquor or beer in Sri Lanka is Lion Brewery Ltd. They produced an average of 80.9% of the market
share for beer in 2014-2019.
16
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
17
Wine Production
Exhibit 10: Manufacturers of wine, number of litres produced and market share (%) in 2014-2019 25
Lanka Wine (Pvt) Ltd - Foreign - 0.0 2,416 50.0 4,539 48.9 - 0.0 - 0.0
Across the years, the largest manufacturer of wine in the country has been the Lanka Wine Company - local. They have produced
an average share of 77.7% of wine in the market from 2014-2019.
24
Figures for 2014 in proof litres, 2015 in litres, 2016 in bulk litres and 2018-2019 in absolute litres.
25
Figures for 2014-2016 are in proof litres. Figures in 2018 and 2019 are in absolute litres.
Sake Production
Exhibit 11: Manufacturers of sake, number of litres produced and market share (%) in 2014-2019 26
Toddy Production
Exhibit 12: Manufacturers of bottled toddy, number of litres produced and market share (%) in 2014-2019 27
26
Figures for 2014-2018 in bulk litres. Figures in 2019 in absolute litres.
27
Figures for 2014 in proof litres, 2015 in litres, 2016 in bulk litres and 2018-2019 in absolute litres
18
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
19
2014 2015 2016 2018 2019
Name of Manufacturer
Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity
% % % % %
(PL) (PL) (PL) (PL) (PL)
Nemta- Madampe 686,750 7.0 715,255 7.3 729,850 7.3 382,855 7.4 129,660 3.2
New Manori Lanka- Madampe - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 744,265 14.4 883,760 21.7
T.S.R Bottled Toddy- Marawila 1,030,545 10.5 1,079,940 11.1 1,083,570 10.9 487,380 9.4 486,993 12.0
Camel Bottled Toddy-Colombo 32,835 0.3 35,635 0.4 31,250 0.3 11,730 0.2 10,520 0.3
Three Line Bottled Toddy-Badulla 179,672 1.8 215,301 2.2 250,986 2.5 470,740 9.1 340,502 8.4
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Jaffna- Jaffna 24,058 0.2 35,273 0.4 25,765 0.3 27,198 0.5 31,853 0.8
Kopai- Jaffna 24,616 0.3 25,781 0.3 40,464 0.4 63,809 1.2 48,195 1.2
Chankanei-Chankanei 104,851 1.1 163,972 1.7 143,345 1.4 77,812 1.5 103,576 2.5
Manipai-Chankanei 21,869 0.2 66,706 0.7 63,622 0.6 29,483 0.6 16,982 0.4
Pandatiarippu-Chankanei 64,648 0.7 103,338 1.1 73,251 0.7 55,148 1.1 43,994 1.1
Kayts- Chankanei 23,193 0.2 42,141 0.4 - 0.0 41,240 0.8 26,855 0.7
2014 2015 2016 2018 2019
Name of Manufacturer
Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity
% % % % %
(PL) (PL) (PL) (PL) (PL)
Kareinagar-Chankanei 35,476 0.4 55,473 0.6 66,284 0.7 50,417 1.0 81,826 2.0
Valikamam-Chankanei (Nawali) 21,139 0.2 30,103 0.3 - 0.0 46,213 0.9 8,926 0.2
Chawakachcheri-Chawakachcheri 42,753 0.4 68,652 0.7 86,174 0.9 87,113 1.7 44,484 1.1
Kodikamam-Chawakachcheri 13,698 0.1 61,598 0.6 88,503 0.9 90,213 1.7 23,559 0.6
Chunnaham- Mallakam 79,468 0.8 94,041 1.0 87,698 0.9 96,510 1.9 46,113 1.1
Kondawil- Mallakam 41,101 0.4 40,518 0.4 26,674 0.3 50,653 1.0 39,744 1.0
Thellipalai- Mallakam 76,552 0.8 78,624 0.8 42,950 0.4 74,679 1.4 39,270 1.0
Atchuvely- Mallakam - 0.0 27,302 0.3 39,822 0.4 38,704 0.8 28,463 0.7
Kilinochchi- Kilinochchi
18,313 0.2 - 0.0 227,968 2.3 361,238 7.0 208,086 5.1
(Konawil)
Thunukai- Kilinochchi
- 0.0 4,323 0.0 6,331 0.1 117,054 2.3 5,598 0.1
(Pandiynakulam)
Pudukuduiripuppu-Mullaittivu - 0.0 50,310 0.5 54,533 0.5 100,831 2.0 27,244 0.7
Mullai West- Mullaittivu - 0.0 - 0.0 71,253 0.7 81,875 1.6 64,365 1.6
20
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
21
2014 2015 2016 2018 2019
Name of Manufacturer
Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity
% % % % %
(PL) (PL) (PL) (PL) (PL)
Mullai East- Mullaittivu - 0.0 - 0.0 33,719 0.3 52,898 1.0 43,266 1.1
Poonagari- Mullaittivu - 0.0 - 0.0 1,049 0.0 90,720 1.8 95,467 2.3
Empire Toddy Manufactory - 0.0 3,650 0.0 225,955 2.3 - 0.0 - 0.0
Manori Lanka Pvt Ltd 1,369,165 14.0 1,439,635 14.8 1,462,260 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0
2014 2015 2016 2018 2019
Name of Manufacturer
Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity
% % % % %
(PL) (PL) (PL) (PL) (PL)
Mulliyavalai Bottled Toddy
Manufactory
- 0.0 42,719 0.4 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0
The manufacturers of bottled toddy in Sri Lanka are numerous. However, Exhibit 12 highlights only the top manufacturers of
bottled toddy, led by T.S.R Bottled Toddy- Marawila, which has produced toddy across the years, accounting for an average market
share of 10.8%.
22
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
23
Imported Liquor
Sri Lanka Customs does not release data on the quantity of liquor imported into the country by importing companies. However,
the Export Development Trade Statistics portal they maintain does provide data on the CIF value and quantity of liquor imported
into the country over the years. Exhibit 13 below summarizes the quantity of liquor imported into the country from 2017-2020. More
than 50% of the quantity of alcohol imported into the country comprises hard liquor varieties such as gin, whiskies, rum, arrack etc.
(HS Code 2208)
Exhibit 13: Quantity of liquor (in litres) imported into the country and market share (as a percentage of total quantity of liquor imported)
2017-2020
24
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Our interviews revealed that the following factors are considered when deciding
tax rates for different locally produced alcoholic beverages:
“The tax differentials between soft liquors such as beer against hard liquors such
as arrack, are often decided in a manner that will not result in a large shift between
soft liquor consumption to hard liquor consumption, or vice versa”(Official from
the Department of Excise, Sri Lanka)
However, neither the Ministry of Finance nor the Department of Excise conduct
timely consumption or welfare studies or surveys that assess the impact of
taxation on consumption, revenue, or health for the purpose of informing alcohol
tax decisions. Therefore, despite claiming to consider the above factors when
determining taxes, there is no evidence of it being put into practice.
As is made evident in Question 9, the patterns of excise tax increases over the years
show that they are often done so in an ad-hoc manner. This is seen in the fact
that tax increaseshave wide variations across years and in the same year across
products, and that there is no discernible pattern in the inconsistent variations
across time and products. As such, it is our view that the government’s ad hoc
revenue interests and other vested interests play a larger role in determining
excise tax rates in Sri Lanka.
◆ Excise Duty
◆ Value Added Tax (VAT)
◆ Customs Duty
◆ Value Added Tax (VAT)
◆ Ports and Airports Development Levy (PAL)
◆ Cess Duty
25
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
b) Imported Liquor
◆ In the 2019 budget speech, it was proposed that excise duty on liquor will
be decided based on an indexation system, capturing both annual inflation
and income growth (GDP changes).28 However, as of 2022, there has been
no evidence that this system has been implemented when deciding the
amount of tax.
28
2Budget Speech 2019, Ministry of Finance, Sri Lanka. Available at
[Link] [Last
accessed 12 February 2022]
26
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Table 14 below shows the tax rates from 2010-2021 by type of locally produced
alcoholic beverage. It shows that, over the last 11 years, the government has
implemented numerous tax increases on almost all alcoholic beverages. However,
there were a few exceptions to this in both 2015 and 2021.
◆ The tax on a bulk litre of malt liquor (beer) below 5% was reduced from
LKR 190 in March 2015 to LKR 160 in November 2015 and increased to
LKR 190 again in December 2015. Insights from interviews conducted
suggest that this reduction in November 2015 was done in the hopes
of encouraging soft liquor consumption. However, this was to no avail,
as the rates increased a month later. The tax on bottled toddy (per
bulk litre) was also reduced from LKR 50 in 2017 to LKR 25 in 2021.
27
Exhibit 14: Tax rates for locally produced alcohol beverages, 2010-2021
ease
Sake
Arrack
Ethyl Alcohol
Bottled Toddy
Special Arrack
Foreign Liquor
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
24-
660 - - - 790 - - - 515 - 58 - 74 - - - - -
Jun-10
29-
710 8% - - 840 6% - - 565 10% 63 9% 79 7% - - - -
Oct-10
23-
813 15% - - 953 13% - - 668 18% 80 27% 96 22% - - - -
Nov 10
7-
863 6% - - 1003 5% - - 718 7% 80 0% 96 0% - - - -
Jan-11
25-
923 7% - - 1063 6% - - 778 8% 85 6% 101 5% - - - -
Oct-11
22-
- - - - - - 100 - - - - - - - - - - -
Nov-11
30-
983 7% - - 1123 6% - - 838 8% 90 6% 106 5% - - - -
Mar-12
6-
1043 6% - - 1183 5% - - 898 7% 100 11% 116 9% - - - -
Oct-12
28
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
29
ease
Sake
Arrack
Ethyl Alcohol
Bottled Toddy
Special Arrack
Foreign Liquor
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
Oct-14
3-
1595 7% - - 1860 9% - - - - 190 27% 245 32% - - - -
Oct-15
21-
1850 16% - - 2030 9% - - - - 160 -16% 315 29% - - - -
Nov-15
5-
- - - - - - - - - - 190 19% 315 0% - - - -
Dec-15
1-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 - - -
Jan-16
1-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 -
Apr-16
ease
Sake
Arrack
Ethyl Alcohol
Bottled Toddy
Special Arrack
Foreign Liquor
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
% Tax Difference
Source: Various gazettes, Department of Excise – Sri Lanka - Performance Report 2018, 2019, Department of Excise – Sri Lanka
30
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
All alcoholic beverages that are locally produced are subject to an excise duty at the
point of manufacture. Imported liquor, on the other hand, is subject to a customs
duty. However, the rate of excise duty and customs duty differs depending on
the alcoholic beverage concerned. The taxation system for different alcoholic
beverages is detailed in Question 1 and Question 9.
As per Exhibit 14 above, no significant reduction to alcohol tax rates was made
by the government. The only notable tax reduction that took place was for malt
liquor (beer) below 5% in 2015, during the budget speech for the year 2016. During
the interviews conducted for this report, it was mentioned that this reduction
was done in the hopes of encouraging consumers to shift to soft liquor varieties
for health reasons. However, by the third reading of the budget, this decision
was reversed to its previous rate because the then President, Hon. Maithripala
Sirisena had launched a separate campaign, “Mathata Thitha” to discourage the
consumption of all types of alcohol among the public.
A review of the literature revealed that some explanations have been given for
why duties have been increased, although these do not cover all increases.
29
Annual Report 2020, Ministry of Finance, p. 72
30
Siri Hettige, and Dharmadasa Paranagama, ‘Gender, Alcohol and Culture in Sri Lanka’, Alcohol,
Gender and Drinking Problems (2005), p. 168, available at
[Link]
=1&isAllowed=y [Last accessed 6th April 2022]
31
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
The objective of this study was to estimate the economic costs of alcohol
consumption (in terms of selected alcohol- related disease conditions) in Sri
Lanka for the year 2015. Using a methodology specified by the World Health
Organization (prevalence-based cost of illness and gross costing approach), this
study looked at direct economic costs (costs of inpatient and outpatient care
borne by the state and out-of-pocket expenses borne by patients themselves)
of diseases attributed to alcohol use and indirect economic costs (lost earnings
due to being a patient or loss of income because of death) related to the use of
alcohol incurred in Sri Lanka.
The findings showed that the total economic cost of alcohol use in Sri Lanka
was USD 885.85 million (1.07% of GDP) in 2015. Of this, USD 388.35 million (44%)
consisted of direct costs, while USD 497.49 (66%) consisted of indirect costs. The
loss of productivity due to premature mortality, USD 388.86 million, was the
highest cost category, accounting for 44% of the overall cost. The next highest
cost was the inpatient care cost of USD 293.75 million, which was one third of the
total cost. In comparison, the excise revenue generated by the government in the
same year was only USD 779.73 million in 2015. At a micro-level, the economic
costs of alcohol on the average Sri Lankan household (although not quantified)
were also highlighted. These included low wages (because of missed work and
reduced efficiency on the job), lost employment opportunities, increased medical
expenses for illness and accidents, fines fordrink-related offences, and decreased
eligibility for loans etc. These exert much pressure on the national economy.
The study also listed out many other costs associated with the consumption of
alcohol on everyday Sri Lankans. These included injuries and deaths associated
with road traffic accidents; harm from interpersonal violence, aggression and
crime; harm to families, including psychological distress, pain and suffering from
domestic violence, marital separation and divorce, child and household neglect,
poverty; and harm to the developing fetus etc.
The study concludes that the government should aim to minimize such high
costs resulting from alcohol consumption in the country through effective
taxation that will reduce the affordability of alcohol, strengthen the enforcement
of existing restrictions on advertising and promotion, and enhance the capacity
of enforcement agencies to implement drink driving countermeasures and to
educate the public on the harms of alcohol consumption.
32
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Despite the costly nature of alcoholic beverages, it was revealed that, even
among poorer communities, there is a social expectation to serve alcohol at
weddings and contribute alcohol to drinking parties. These events happen on a
regular basis in such settings. Not adhering to these expectations and norms of
these events carries with it a risk of social sanctions by the rest of the community.
The study revealed how such social expectations interfere with the social and
economic advancement of the members of such communities and contribute
to poverty.
Alcohol and Drug Information Centre (ADIC). (2020) Survey on alcohol and
tobacco consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sri Lanka. http://
[Link]/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/COVID-19-and-alcohol-and-
[Link]
This study, conducted by ADIC Sri Lanka, comprised a survey to evaluate the
changes in both alcohol and tobacco consumption among Sri Lankans during
COVID-19 in 2020. The survey was conducted between the 1st and 10th of May
2020. The study revealed that 80% of the respondents had reduced their
consumption of alcohol during the lockdown period. A major reason for this, as
54% of respondents stated, was the closure of outlets that sold alcohol during the
lockdown period.
In addition, 49% of the wives of male respondents who had reduced their
consumption of alcohol reported a decline in family issues and problems, and 40%
of them also claimed they had seen an increase in their family savings because of
the decrease in expenditure on alcohol caused by reduced alcohol consumption.
As the study concludes, these findings highlight the costs of alcohol use by
revealing the benefits of being free of or reducing the use of alcohol.
33
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Dayaratne, G.D., (2013) State of the Sri Lankan Alcohol Industry and Analysis of
Governing Policies. Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka at [Link]
wp-content/uploads/2017/01/[Link]
The aim of this study was to provide policy makers with a balanced policy option
for alcohol that could be implemented, monitored and enforced effectively. The
study does so by taking into consideration the views and opinions of various
stakeholders from the industry, whilst maintaining the goal of enhancing
government revenue from legal alcohol.
The study also notes that tax increases have benefits because they have the
potential to alter harmful drinking habits of adult consumers. Higher tax increases
on hard liquor, relative to tax increases on soft liquor, can encourage consumers
to switch from hard liquor varieties to soft liquor varieties, thereby indirectly
improving the health of these consumers and reducing harm to those around
them. However, such changes in behavior as a result of tax increases can only
be achieved if measures to detect illicit alcohol production can be strengthened,
and corruption among stakeholders within the industry and political loopholes
within the industry can be adequately addressed. In addition, ensuring public
support and political commitment to develop and apply evidence-based policies
and recommendations that are sensitive to the cultural and economic diversity
of consumers can also help to achieve intended expectations of alcohol tax
increases. Based on this study, a tax reform that not only aims to increase tax
rates, but also addresses other concerns and weaknesses within the industry
that could hinder the effectiveness of such tax increases (highlighted above), can
successfully bring about tangible benefits to the country in the medium term or
in the long term.
34
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
Exhibit 15: DALYs affected per 100,000 (age-standardised) people (for all ages) in Sri
Lanka by alcohol consumption induced problems in 2012
Poisoning 6
Liver Cancer 21
Interpersonal violence 91
In addition to this, the report also highlights details on community action and
several non-tax related government policies and approaches implemented to
reduce the harms of alcohol consumption in the country. For example, Sri Lanka
mandates that nutritional information of the beverage should be available on
the label of alcohol containers. It also mandates that the alcohol content (% of
ethanol by volume) is indicated on labels of alcohol containers.
‘The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries
and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease
Study 2016’, Lancet Psychiatry, November 2018 at [Link]
action/showPdf?pii=S2215-0366%2818%2930337-7
35
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
The objective of this study was to use data from the Global Burden of Diseases,
Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2016 to calculate global and regional
estimates of the prevalence of alcohol, cocaine, opioid dependence, and
other types of dependencies, as well as to estimate the global disease burden
attributable to alcohol and drug use between 1990 and 2016 for 195 countries. The
study is considered the first of its kind to estimate associations between alcohol
and drug attributable burden and sociodemographic development. Findings
reveal that there is much variation geographically with regard to the magnitude
and contribution of alcohol and drug use to disease burden.
The study provides estimates for Sri Lanka (Exhibit 16) in terms of DALYs, years
of life lost (YLLs), years of healthy lives lost (YLDs), and deaths attributable to
alcohol use in 2016. Although the study does not draw a causal link between an
increase in alcohol tax rates that can alter alcohol consumption, and DALYs and
lives that could be saved, these figures suggest there could be a positive impact
on the number of DALYs and lives that could be saved if any policy or regulation
– including a tax hike - is implemented to reduce the consumption of alcohol.
According to these estimates, an increase in tax rates could save 1164 DALYs per
100,00 people and can prevent the deaths of 36.2 lives per 100,00 people.
Exhibit 15: DALYs affected per 100,000 (age-standardised) people (for all ages) in Sri
Lanka by alcohol consumption induced problems in 2012
The study also details the ways in which causes of alcohol and drug burden can
be prevented and treated. These include taxation, regulation of the availability
of alcohol, regulating marketing strategies that promote alcohol, reducing the
alcoholic strength in beverages, and implementing minimum prices on alcohol
etc. Interventions that can be taken to reduce alcohol consumption-related
injuries and deaths during travel, such as implementing blood alcohol limits,
alcohol testing of drivers, mandating seat belts and helmets etc., were also listed.
31
Uncertainty Intervals
36
37
ANNEX A
Current tariff rates imposed by SLC for imported liquor by HS Code (at the 6-digit level)
General
HS Code Description Unit Customs VAT PAL Cess
Duty
22.03 Beer made from malt
2203.00.10 Canned beer less than 350 ml Per litre 550/= 8% 10% -
2203.00.20 Canned beer 350 ml or more Per litre 550/= 8% 10% -
2203.00.90 Other Per litre 550/= 8% 10% -
22.04 Wine of fresh grapes, including fortified wines; grape must other than that of heading 20.09
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
38
DESK RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL TAXATION IN SRI LANKA
The methodology for setting tax rates on alcoholic beverages in Sri Lanka technically involves considering factors like revenue collection, consumption patterns, industry welfare, and public health. However, there is no specific formula consistently applied in practice. Despite suggestions for an indexation system capturing inflation and GDP growth, there is no evidence of its implementation. Tax rates often appear to be determined in an ad-hoc manner with no clear pattern .
Between 2014 and 2019, the market shares of alcoholic beverage manufacturers in Sri Lanka showed notable shifts. For example, Lion Brewery Ltd maintained a dominant position in the beer market, averaging over 80% share, despite lower production in certain years. Distilleries Company Sri Lanka Ltd consistently led in arrack production, averaging 68.6% market share. However, the introduction of new players and changes in production volumes caused fluctuations in other segments, evidencing adaptations to taxation and market conditions .
Recent tax reductions in Sri Lanka's alcoholic beverage industry, such as the drop in tax on bottled toddy, aim to adjust consumption towards specific product types. While intended to encourage soft liquor consumption, the lack of official explanation and the subsequent re-increases highlight ad-hoc policy-making with limited adherence to planned public health objectives. These reductions, while occasionally justified as revenue and market share strategies, often lead to market confusion and do not sustainably alter consumption patterns .
Transitioning from the proof litre to the absolute litre taxation system significantly affected alcohol tax rates in Sri Lanka. The absolute litre system, introduced to replace the complex proof system, resulted in a specific taxation method based on the alcohol volume within products. This change led to adjustments in tax rates for arrack, country-made foreign liquor, and beer, particularly noticeable with tax rate increases implemented after November 2017 .
The Absolute Litre System (ABV) taxes alcoholic beverages in Sri Lanka by measuring the specific volume of alcohol contained in the product. For instance, if a beverage like arrack contains 40% alcohol, then the tax is applied to the 4 litres of alcohol in every 10 litres of the beverage. This method applies to beverages such as locally produced arrack, imported liquor, and some local wines, depending on their alcohol concentration .
The primary factors considered when determining tax rates for alcoholic beverages in Sri Lanka include the impact on excise revenue, consumption patterns, industry welfare, and public health. However, these factors do not strongly influence the final tax decisions. Instead, tax rates are often adjusted due to ad-hoc government revenue interests, leading to inconsistent patterns in tax adjustments without a systematic approach based on the aforementioned factors .
Over the past decade, excise taxes on alcoholic beverages in Sri Lanka have generally increased, with key spikes corresponding to significant regulatory changes like the shift to the absolute litre system in 2017. While these increases are intended to align with revenue goals and discourage harmful consumption, justifications often lack transparency and systematic evaluation. Instead, rates appear to be influenced mainly by short-term governmental revenue needs, leading to erratic and sometimes contradictory fiscal adjustments .
The tax differentials between soft liquors like beer and hard liquors like arrack are intended to prevent significant shifts in consumption patterns from soft to hard liquors. Despite this, the lack of consistent consumption studies or systematic tax application means the actual impact remains unclear. Historical adjustments, such as the temporary reduction in 2015 beer taxes to encourage soft liquor consumption, demonstrate attempts to influence behavior, but the subsequent increase suggests these are not effectively sustained .
The current alcohol taxation system for locally produced liquors in Sri Lanka consists mainly of the excise duty, which is a specific type of tax based on the volume of alcohol in the product. This system has replaced the previous proof litre and bulk litre system. The excise duty is imposed by the Department of Excise and applies to various types of arrack, beers, and liquors produced locally .
The price of locally produced alcoholic beverages in Sri Lanka is primarily influenced by excise duties and Value Added Tax (VAT). In contrast, imported beverages are subject to customs duties, VAT, the Ports and Airports Development Levy (PAL), and cess duty. Each type of tax impacts the final retail price, but the multiplicity of these taxes often results in higher prices for imported beverages compared to locally produced ones .