Bearing Capacity Calculations for Footings
Uploaded by
shashwat8299Bearing Capacity Calculations for Footings
Uploaded by
shashwat8299Common questions
Powered by AITo determine the gross safe bearing capacity (qgs), use qfs = qult/Fs where Fs is the factor of safety. For net safe bearing capacity (qns), qns = qfs - q, where q is the overburden pressure at footing depth. Terzaghi’s equation is q = γ × Df, Df being the depth of footing, γ the soil unit weight. Utilize cohesion, angle of internal friction, and effective unit weight to compute q by Terzaghi's bearing capacity formula: qult = cNc + qNq + 0.5γBNγ involving factors Nc, Nq, and Nγ .
Skempton’s equation for settlement in soft clay focuses on shear strength and consolidation properties. Incorporate the un drained shear strength (cu) and consolidation predictions. Calculate initial settlement as Si = Hσ'/E based on stress increase (σ'), footing load, and clay modulus of elasticity (E), combined with void ratio changes, effective stress variations, and sample correlation factors depicting actual environmental conditions. This ensures that pre-consolidation and time settlement predictions adhere to the corrected clay modulus and Skempton’s empirical correlations .
According to Terzaghi's theory, the presence of a water table affects the effective stress, leading to variations in bearing capacity. When the water table is closer to the footing, it reduces the effective unit weight (γ') used in calculations, thereby lowering the ultimate bearing capacity. It remains higher when the water table is deeper, due to higher effective stress .
When a footing is partially below the water table, adjustment involves using submerged or effective unit weight (γ') in place of total unit weight (γ). This is calculated as γ' = γ - γw, where γw is the unit weight of water. This reduces the calculated overburden pressure and the effective stress, influencing the ultimate bearing capacity obtained through Terzaghi's or other theories .
Both Meyerhof and Hansen’s theories account for bearing capacity under different conditions but differ in factor considerations. Meyerhof employs depth and load inclinations, emphasizing shape and depth factors affecting stress and critical load distribution across varied embedment. Hansen incorporates similar components but expands on surcharge effects and load factors, refining depth effect with more variables. Comparatively, Meyerhof simplifies assumptions, while Hansen handles complex stress interactions, offering finer predictive accuracy in complex conditions .
Soil cohesion (c) directly contributes to the bearing capacity in both cohesive and mixed soils. Higher cohesion increases the overall capacity. Unit weight (γ) affects the overburden pressure and thus the effective stress, influencing the bearing capacity calculations. In cohesive soils, unconfined strength primarily reflects cohesion impact, while in non-cohesive soils, friction angle (φ') combined with γ impacts the bearing capacity. Adjustments for water content, density, and angle of shearing resistance further fine-tune capacity outputs .
Load eccentricity reduces the effective area of the footing, thereby increasing stress on remaining soil. Load inclination impacts vertical stress distribution, potentially increasing settlement unevenly. Plate load tests extrapolate linear proportional settlement, not fully accounting for these nonlinear effects. Settlements tend to increase beyond direct scaling of load ratio due to stress redistribution, which can be significant without correction for eccentric and inclined loads .
Immediate settlement is inversely related to the soil's modulus of elasticity (E); higher E results in less deformation. Poisson's ratio (ν), influencing volumetric strain contribution to settlements, affects lateral deformations. As ν increases, lateral expansion inhibits vertical settlement for constant E. The deformation under a load thus decreases when modulus is high and Poisson's ratio hinders vertical consolidation progress, reducing immediate settlement .
The net ultimate bearing capacity (qnu) is calculated accounting for inclination and eccentricity using a reduction factor in IS: 6403-1981. The effective width (B') adjusts for eccentricity, B' = B - 2e, where B is width and e is eccentricity. The load angle introduces a factor of i = (1 - (tan α/tan φ')), where α is the load angle and φ' is the angle of shearing resistance. Thus, qnu adjusts the ultimate bearing capacity by these factors .
The ultimate bearing capacity (qult) of a strip footing on purely cohesive soil, using Terzaghi’s concept, is given by qult = 5.7c, where c is the cohesion. For an unconfined compressive strength of 50 kN/m², c = qu/2 = 25 kN/m², thus qult = 5.7 × 25 = 142.5 kN/m² .