BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025

IN THE MATIER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

INDEX
s. No. PARTICULARS PAGE No.

1. Opening Sheet 1-3

2. Urgent Application 4
3. Notice of Motion 5
4. Certificate of Non-Filing 6
5. Certificate of Revision 7

6. Certificate of Maintainability 8
7. Court Fee 9
8. Memo of Parties 10
9. List of Dates and Events 11-12

10. Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 13-20
against the Judgment of failing to substantiate the
ground of cruelty dated 19.11.2024 as passed by the Ld.
Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini District Court (North
West), New Delhi in Petition bearing number HMA 198 of
2017, herein titled as Siddharth v. Rajbala along with
Affidavit in support thereof

11 . An Application Under Section 5 Of The Limitation Act, 21-23

1963 Seeking Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Petition
Along With Affidavit In Support Thereof
12. An Application under Rule 3 (c) of chapter IV 24-26
(Presentation of Pleadinqs, other Documents, and
 Maintenance of Case Files) of Delhi High Court
(Original Side) Rules, 2018 seeking condonation of
delay in re- filing the appeal.

13. Annexure -1 27-36

Certified Copy of Order dated 19.11.2024 passed by Ld .
Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini District Court (North
West), New Delhi.
14. Annexure- 2 37-57
Certified Copy of the Petition under Section 13 (1) (i-a)
Hindu Marriage Act, 1954 bearing number HMA 198 of
2017, herein titled as Siddharth v. Rajbala before the
court of Ld . Princigal Judge, Family Court (North West),
Rohini Delhi
15. Annexure- 3 58
Certified copy of the newspaper clipping proving the
Appellant and Respondent were debarred
16. Annexure- 4 59-60
Certified copy of the Mediation Settlement Agreement
between the Appellant and the Respondent ·-
17. Annexure- 5 61-63
Certified copy of Rent Agreement dated 29.04.2017
18. Vakalatnama 64

19. Proof of Service

THROUGH:

~- . ,...~ ruJc,
Place: New Delhi
~~l bl~2kh-Ol+
KUNAL soNI & AssociAtEs
Date: lr>..07.2025 Counsels for the Appellant
S 104, Greater Kailash - II, New Delhi- 48
+91 95406 66337

UNDERTAKING:
I submit that each and every page of the accompanying Appeal has been
carefully filed in the OCR Format, as prescribed.

DEVA

(Advocate)
I( Jib!#(¥
TU I:H:. 'I YPI::.LJ or I'RI N t'I::.LJ LISTING PROFORMA Pagel

INSTIWCTIONS : I. ON LY TYPE the information in the relevant boxes. 3. DO NOT Staple the Sheet. /f)
2. DO NOT TYPE OUTSIDE THE BOXES. (_J/

• rtt:A·LMP- uc.} IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

rb.. Of ,J(h?s- •
IN THE MATT ER OF:-
.. .. .. FIRST PLAfNTIFF I PETITIONER

VS

.... FIRST DEFENDANT I RESPONDENT

I (a) Case Category

I I
(b) Case Category
I I
I !Cf . ft · cl~lf
2 (a) Date of Decision of Court I
Autholitv of First Instance I
(b) Case Partieu Iars

Number

(c) Authority passing the

I t1MA
I lCfC6 I OF I Jb'~
I
I
•
above order
IPtJ~ctP~L~o~e, ~'L'f CAA1 ~o~~ WEs-r) I 1
(

~HIIJ1 b tST~ t1 Lc~\:} b€U4f I

3(a) Date of Decision of Appellate I
Revisional Court Authority N)\ I
(b) Case Particulars
Nt\ I
Number OF
'N~ I I NJ.\ I
(c) Cou rt I Authority passing
the above order l\-.\~ I
~~ I
4(a) Similar Matter
Case Type I N~ I
Number I N~ I OF I N~ I
(b) Date of Decision
I NPt - I
5 Statute Involved
IS· ~ ( \)~-,} lo}~~ \-\tN!l) W&B\1\~ f\C,1 I
I I
Date of lmou!!ned order
I tc\ . H · ~~ I Final order ~ lnterlocutorv order D
• DATE
•
 TU HI: TYI'I:.O or PRINTEO LISTING PROFORMA Page2

INSTRUCTIONS : I . ONLY TYPE the information in the relevant boxes. 3. DO NOT Staple the Sheet.
2. DO NOT TYPE OUTSIDE TH E BOXES .
@
• • IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Number Year

! Jo~
• •
OF
I·
Criminal Matters- Code 100 to lOS

FIR No.
'
I - I
FIR Date
I - I
Police Station
I - I
Service Matters- Code 500 to 505
Department I Authority I
Organization etc. I .........
I
I - 1

Motors Accident Claim Matters -Code 600

Insurance Company
,..__ -1
(if any) I
I - I
Tax Matters- Code 1300 to 1307
Notification I
Circular No. I - I
I - I
Date of Notification I
Circular I - I
Description of Goods
(Excise I Customs Cases) I - I
I - I
Land Acquisition Matters- Code 1500

VII [Link] I
~

I
Date or section 4 Notification
I - I
Date of section 6 Noti tication
I - I
Date of section 17 l4) Notification
I ~
I
Number of Award
I -., I
O:HP. nf Aw~rci
I - I

• DATE I lc·()l ~t)l$"

•
 za;w ezt ~

TU HI:: TYPt:L> or PRINTEL>

LISTING PROFORMA Page3@
I NSTIWCTIONS: I . ONLY TYPE the information in the relevant boxes. 3 . DO NOT Staple the Sheet.
2. DO OT TYPE OUTS IDE THE BOXES .

• Case Tvpc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Number

OF
Year

~~~S
•
•
'

Bank and Company Matters- Code 2300 to 2400

___,.
Name of Bank I I I
Company

Branch
I
I
-- I
I
Academic Institution Matters- Code 2500
Name of Institution
(School , Col lege, University I <.-
I
or any other Institution)
I - I
Miscellaneous Matters pertaining to Statutory and
other authority or Organisation- Code 3700 to 4400
Name of authority I
Organisation I .--- I
l - I
Society Matters - Code 4500

Name of Society I
Co- Operative Society I - I
I I
Constitutional Matters- Code 4701
Title of Statute I Rule I -7
Regu lation I Bye - Law I I
I - I
I - I
I to-Ol·;t~ Lawyers Code l9
I D % ):1 ()~
•
DATE

• •
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. {F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT
VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT
URGENT APPLICATION

To,
The Deputy Registrar,
Delhi High Court,
New Delhi.

Dear Sir,

Please kindly treat this accompanying application as an urgent one in

accordance with the High Court Rules and Orders.
The grounds of urgency are: as prayed in the present petition.

APPELLANT
THROUGFI:

~a_t>/quf2-DP-
Place: New Delhi KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIAteS
ADVOCATES

Date: 1b .!1J_.2025 Counsels for the Appell ant

S-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Delhi - 110048

- - - - -- - - - - -
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT
NOTICE OF MOTION

Sir,
The enclosed application in the aforesaid matter is being fi led on behalf of the
Appellants and is likely to be listed on __ or any other date t hereafter. Please
take notice accordingly.

G~
APPELLANT

THROUGH:

< ~'i t>/'f2.i./:ltl't

Place: New Delhi KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIATES
ADVOCATES

Date:1!2_.0Q.2025 Counsels for the Appellant

S-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Delhi - 110048
Mob. 9540666337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT
VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF NON-FILING

That the Appellant has not filed any other similar petition; neither before this
Hon'ble Court nor before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India except for the
present one.

APPELLANT

THROUGH:

~o,t>/"'V>/20(l
Place: New Delhi KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIATES
ADVOCATES

Date:f2_.lX.2025 Counsels for the Appellant

S-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Delhi - 110048
Mob. 9540666337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT
VERSUS
RAJBALA .. .RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF REVISION

That the Appellant is filing this Appeal after being aggrieved by the Impugned
Order dated 19.11.2024 by SH. DISNESH BHATT, Principal Judge, Family Court
(North West), Rohini District Court, Delhi in HMA Petition bearing no. 198 of
2017, titled as Siddharth v. Rajbala wherein Hon'ble Court of Principal Judge,
Family Court (North West) refused to note any Cruelty by the Respondent on
the Appellant.

That the Appellant has attached all relevant documents pertaining to the Trial
Court, and no other additional documents have been filed.

That the Appellant has not filed any other similar petition; neither before this
Hon'ble Court nor before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of I ndia except fo r t he
present one.

~~
APPELLANT

THROUGH :

~A
&
hl"f;u,/ '2.0 t-ot
KUNAL SONI ASSOCIAtES
Place: New Delhi
ADVOCATES

Date : l2._0&. 2025 Counsels for the Appe llant

S-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Delhi - 110048
Mob. 9540666337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT
CERTIFICATE OF MAINTAINABILITY
That the Appellant is filing this Appeal as filing the same is the only remedy
available to the aggrieved Appellant against the Impugned Order dated
19.11.2024 by Sh. DINESH BHATT, Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini (North
West), Rohini District Court, Delhi in HMA 198 of 2017, titled as Siddharth v.
Rajbala wherein Hon'ble Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini (North
West) refused to note the cruelty that the Appellant is being made to suffer by
the Respondent.

APPELLANT

THROUGH:

~:1~2i t~n--
KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIATES
Place: New Delhi
ADVOCATES
Date: ~ .~.2025 Counsels for the Appellant
S-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Del hi - 110048
Mob. 9540666337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. (F.C.} OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS

RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

COURT FEES

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

e-Court Fee

DATE & TIME : 29-AUG-2024 14:30:14

NAMES OF THE ACC / REGISTERED USER : SHCIL

LOCATION : SAKET

e -COURT RECEIPT NO : DLCT2900H24300460

e-CO URT FEE AMOUNT : ~ 30

( R upees Thirty On ly)

111 11111111 111 11111111111111 11111111111 1111111111111111111111

DLCT2900H24300460

Statutory Alert : The authenticity of this e-Court fee receipt should be verified at [Link] . Any d

details on this receipt and as available on the website renders it invalid. In case of any disc re pancy please 1nform
Authonty. This rece1pt 1s valid only after verification & lock1ng by the Court Official.
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. {F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

MEMO OF PARTIES
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

S/o Sh. Jeet Ram,

R/o E-55, Phase II, Vijay Vihar,
New Delhi
VERSUS

RAJBALA .. . RESPONDENT

W/o Sh. siddharth

D/o Sh. Bodhraj
R/o A26, Lions enclave,
Vikas Nagar,
New Delhi

THROUGH:

Place: New Delhi

~~112-.l. 1
KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIATES
2 \'l\1-

Date: 13_.06.2025 Counsels for the Appellant

S 104, Greater Kailash - II, New Del hi- 48
+91 95406 66337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. {F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS

DATE PARTICULARS l
- - -
28.11.2014 The Appellant and Respondent got married to each other
as per Hindu rites, and customs in the presence of family
and friends
-
June, 2015 The Respondent left the matrimonial home for a said
period of 2 days, but did not return to her matrimonial J

home in the stipulated time I

17.07.2016 - The Respondent again left the matrimonial home without

23.07.16
informing anyone, when the Appellant had left home for I
his professional chores I
-
26.08.2015 Due to constant disrespect at the hands of the Respondent,
the parents of the Appellant have disowned both :.Fl-1 Q:A ~
from their moveable and immoveable properties I
29.09.2015 A Mediation Settlement was affected between the parties j

wherein they had been directed to reside separately in a J

rented accommodation, but shall also put their efforts for '
an ideal matrimonial relationship

06.02.2017 The Appellant filed a Petition under Section 13 (1) (i-a)

Hindu Marriage Act, 1954 bearing number HMA 198 of I
I
20 17, herein titled as Siddharth v. Rajbala before the court
 of Ld. Princigal Judge~ Family: Court (North West)~ Rohini~
Delhi
29.04.2017 The Parties started residing separately in a rented
accommodation in Mangolpuri, New Delhi
I
19.11.2024 Judgement passed by the Ld. Court of Sh. Dinesh Bhatt,
Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini (North West) Rohini
Court, New Delhi
.06.2025 Hence, the present Appeal j
THROUGH :

~q t> )'1z~('lQI7-
Place: New Delhi KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIAl-ES
ADVOCATES
Date: l&_.og.2025 Counsels for the Petitioner
5-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Delhi - 110048
Mob. 9540666337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS
. RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984

AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT OF FAILING TO SUBSTANTIATE THE

GROUND OF CRUELTY AGAINST HUSBAND BY WIFE DATED

19.11.2024 PASSED BY LD. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,

ROHINI (NORTH WEST), ROHINI, NEW DELHI

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That, the Appellant has preferred the present Appeal for setting aside the
Judgement dated 19.11.2024 passed by the Ld. Court of Sh. Dinesh
Bhatt, Principal Judge, Family Court (hereinafter referred to as the "Ld.
Family Court Court''), Rohini (North West) Rohini Court, New Delhi. A
copy of the impugned judgement dated 19.11.2024 is annexed and
marked as Annexure -1. A copy of the Petition under Section 13(1) (i-
a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1954 for seeking dissolution of marriage by
a decree of Divorce as filed before the court of Ld . Principal Judge, Family
Court (North West), Rohini District Court, Delhi is hereby attached and
annexed as Annexure- 2.

2. That, the established legal principles have not been followed and adhered
to and rather unwarranted inferences have been drawn by the Ld. Family
Court.
BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:

1. That, the Appellant and the Respondent are legally wedded Husband and
Wife and their marriage was solemnized on 28.11.2014 and was solemnized
according to Hindu Rites and Rituals. It is submitted that the said marriage
is an arranged marriage and that no child is born out of the wedlock.

2. That, the Respondent allegedly since the inception of the marriage between
the parties, the behaviour was not co-operative, or good towards either the
Appellant or his Parents. The Respondent also allegedly never gave love
and affection, and was never a devoted wife to the Appel lant or her marital
home too.

3. That, it is pertinent to mention herein that the family members of the

Respondent allegedly used to interfere in the marriage of the Appella nt and
Respondent, and used to instigate the Respondent to quarrel with the
Appellant, and his family members.

4. That, one incident that came into the knowledge of the Appellant was that
the Respondent who used to take money from the Appellant for her day-
to-day expenses, were being transferred by the Respondent to her Father.
It is pertinent to mention herein, that when the Ap pellant enquired the same
from the Respondent, he was met with indignation, nasty, and contemptible
behaviour from the Respondent, wherein he and his family was loosely
threatened to be implicated in one or many false cases so that they would
have to serve jail term to be taught a lesson.

5. That, in June 2015, the Respondent left the house of Appellant stating that
she was going to her Maternal Home for 2 (two) days, but she did not return
in the 2 days that she had mentioned. It is pertinent to mention herein that,
 the Appellant had made several efforts thereafter to bring the Respondent
back in his company and family home.

6. That, on 26.08.2015, owing to all the torture and misbehaviour meted out
to the parents of the Appellant, the parents of the Appellant have severed
all ties from the Appellant and Respondent, and have disowned the Parties
from all their movable and immovable properties. That a copy of the
newspaper clipping by the parents of the Appellant debaring the Appe llant
and Respondent from all their properties is hereby attached and annexed
as Annexure- 3.

7. That, on 29.09.2015 a settlement was arrived at between the parties before

the Delhi Govt. Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Rohini which was
achieved by an application that had been moved been moved by the
Appellant; and the parties have amicably settled their differences and have
also agreed to reside or live in the same accommodation as the Appellant.
That, a copy of the Mediation Settlement Agreement is hereby attached and
annexed as Annexure- 4.

8. That, on 29.04.2017 thereafter the Appellant and Respondent started

residing in a rented accommodation bearing address F-751. Mangolpuri.
New Delhi 110083, but there too, the Respondent had not changed her
behaviour, conduct, and courtesy towards the Appellant. That, the copy of
the Rent Agreement is hereby attached and annexed as Annexure- 5.

9. That, it is pertinent to mention here that even though the Appellant and
Respondent were residing in the same premises of the abovementioned
address, there were absolutely no physical relations between the parties,
as the Respondent used to taunt the Appellant for his simple living. That,
additionally, the intention of the Respondent was always to live at her
parental home itself, and she wanted the Appellant to live as a "gharJamal'.
 ®
10. That, the Appellant tried to persuade the Respondent to treat him as
friend, and tried to please her in very little aspect, but the Respondent failed
to reciprocate the same kind of love, affection, and companionship towards
the Appellant. The Appellant though was utterly dejected by the
wrongdoings of the Respondent, he still tried to provide her with every
comfort which were met with humiliations, harassments, and mental agony.

11. That, the Appellant has become the victim of circumstances, cruelties,
and wrongdoings deliberately inflicted by the Respondent upon the
Appellant. The attitude, and misbehaviour of the Respondent have caused
a permanent scar on the mental well-being and emotional feelings of the
Appellant which has only been due to hostile, vicious, and horrid behaviour
of the Respondent.

12. That, from the abovesaid facts and circumstances, it has become evident
and transparent that the Respondent has no sanctity towards the Appellant
or the marital relationship; and that the Appellant has been left with no
other option but to approach this Hon'ble Court by way of the present
Petition for seeking divorce from the Respondent on the ground of cruelty
that has been meted out to him over the years.

GROUNDS:

a. Because, the impugned order dated 19.11.2024 passed by the Ld. Family
Court is illegal and bad in the eyes of law and is hence, liable to be set
aside.

b. Because, the impugned order passed by the Ld. Family Court is totally
discriminatory, misconceived, un-warranted, arbitrary, amounts to
miscarriage of justice and is passed without appreciating the facts and
material availabl~ on record. It is submitted that while passing the

' I
 impugned Order, the Ld. Family Court failed to exercise the jurisdiction
vested in it and passed the impugned Order in a hasty manner.

c. Because, the Court below erred in appreciating the fact that the Appellant
has been going through a lot at the hands of the Respondent, who made
life hell for the Appellant.

d. Because, the Appellant continued to suffer as a consequence of the

Respondent, wherein she continued to perpetuate cruelty and
harassment of the Appellant.

e. Because, the Ld . Family Court failed to appreciate that the Appellant has
been made to reside separately and away from his family, only to fulfil
the demands of the Respondent and trying to keep her happy and co-
habiting with him for a happy marital life between the two.

f. Because, even after moving into a separate accommodation, the

appalling and immoral behaviour of the Respondent continued wherein
she meted out misdeed after misdeed on the Appellant.

g. Because, the Ld . Family Court instead drew an adverse effect and without
vision believed each and every version of the Respondent to be true
herein and dismissed the matter without finding any instances of cruelty
in the marriage of the Parties.

h. Because, the Ld. Family Court failed to appreciate the reasons cited by
the Appellant while being made to suffer constant harassment and
humiliation due to the nasty behaviour of the Respondent categorically
reflects the deliberate abuse of the process of law, and she misused the
liberty granted by the Ld . Family Court.

i. Because, the Ld. Trial Court failed to appreciate the material available on
record.
 j. Because, the Ld. Trial Court has also failed to appreciate the law related
to Cruelty, as defined under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1954.

k. Because, no prejudice shall be caused to the Respondent if the present

Petition stands allowed whereas on the other hand irreparable loss shall
be caused to the Appellant if the relief sought fo r is not granted.

I. Because, the Appellant craves leave of this Hon'ble Court to file any other
additional documents during the course of Arguments.

m. Because, no other similar Appeal is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme

Court of India or the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi .

PRAYER:

It is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

I. Set aside the order dated 19.11.2024 passed Sh. Dinesh Bhatt, Ld.
Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini (North West) Rohini Court, New
Delhi.

II. To pass any other order as this Hon'ble Court may deem ~~
APPEL~,. .

VERIFICATION:
~
Verified on t3 day of June, 2025 that contents that t he contents of the above
Appeal are true and correct to best of my knowledge and belief, nothing
material has been concealed there from.
~-
APPELLANT
 THROUGH:

Place : New Delhi

~c. 1106/2blt-
KuNAL SONI & ASSbCIATES
Date: 13_.06.2025 Counsels for the Appellant
S 104, Greater Kailash - II, New Delhi- 48
+91 95406 66337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
® O
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT

VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT
I, Siddharth, S/o Sh. Jeet Ram, R/o E-55, Phase II, Vijay Vihar New Delhi, aged
about :!fl years, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:
1. That I am the Appellant in the above noted Appeal and well conversant
with the facts and circumstances of the case and as such am fully
competent to swear the present Affidavit.

2. That the contents of accompanying Appeal have been drafted by my

~
~~ DEPONENT

- -~~
: ERTit·lt:.
"h 1/Smt./K
~ r
. - il\T.l
.. ..........
r> ........
c:;t . u......... NJ.....
. ... ... ..• ..·•·•·............... .....
~¢-
•o. W/o ...... ·.. ............... DEPONENT
·t'l:."~""
·~niifi·~·d·;;~·s;;;i·is~i·::n dl. b~fo" ........ .. at
!S so I e m
nly affirme Sl. No.....~.. .._. ...
f.
~lhi. ............; .......... the afhdav~
· wh1ch
lal the [Link] o I I ed to h are
& exp an
_, --.-or.\ to t ·IS knowledge
we .t>een

li N n '~ ·
N~wO<!!h t .
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CM APPL. OF 2025
IN NCT 0~ D&[Link] COURT FE&
DLCT1635014E2432P
16-MAY-2024

MAT. APP. {F.C.) _ _ OF 2025

IN THE MATTER OF:
111111~1111IIIIIIIIIII~IIJIIIIIIIDIIIIIIIII
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT
VERSUS
RAJBALA ...RESPONDENT

AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963

SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE PETITION.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the Appellant has preferred the present Appeal against the order
dated 19.11.2024 passed by Ld. Principal Judge, Family Courts (North
West), Rohini Court, New Delhi in the matter bearing No. HMA 198 of
2017 titled as "Siddharth v. Rajbala". The contents of the Appeal may
kindly be read as a part of this application and the same are not repeated
herein for the sake of brevity.

2. That, after decision of the case, local counsel did not give the complete
case file. And, the Appellant then applied for a Certified Copy. Thereafter,
upon the receipt of the Certified Copy, a new lawyer was contacted who
took some time to read the file. Subsequently, he informed fee which was
beyond the capacity of the Appellant. A new counsel was contacted who
took up the case. Hence, the delay and due to the aforementioned
reason, the present appeal is being filed after a delay of }[Link] days.

3. It is submitted that the delay in filing the Appeal is neither intentional nor
deliberate but due to the reasons beyond the control of the Appellant.
 4. That no prejudice shall be caused to the respondent if the delay in filing
the appeal is condoned. Whereas, great loss would be caused to the
Appellant if delay in filing the Petition is not condoned.

PRAYER

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, it is hereby most

respectfully prayed to this Hon'ble Court:-

a. delay of I~ days in filing the Appeal may kindly be condoned.

b. to pass any other order(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and
proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

(i~
~PPELLANT
THROUGH:
~- A • - /'1 J JCl_
Place: New Delhi
~ t>\ ~ti12.0 11--
KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIATES
ADVOCATES

Date: ~.06.2025 Counsels for the Petitioner

5-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Delhi- 110048
Mob. 9540666337
 . . @)
BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CM APPL. OF 2025
IN
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT
VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT
I, Siddharth, S/o Sh. Jeet Ram, R/o E-55, Phase II, Vijay Vihar New Delhi, aged
about_6q_ years do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:
1. That I am the Applicant in the above noted Application and well
conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case and as such am
fully competent to swear the present Affidavit.
2. That the contents of accompanying Application have been drafted by my
counsel under my instructions and the same has been read over to me
in vernacular and understood by me and the same are true and correct
to my knowledge, the said contents may kindly be read as part and parcel
of the present affidavit which are not being reproduced herein for the
sake of brevity. t:, ' c\ tl\e [Link]' (;0 rnrni

~
8
~'l>s ·_q, · sr. No. 31/24 .s-10
~~0 0 ~ RANDHIR SI NGH ~G)
0
0 r:,e(\
~\ Advocate ""'
~0~ 9"i.e App. By Delhi High Court
~0 6~(\ <('i & Period From 18/10/2024 ~ DEPONENT
(\\"i' ~~ '\ ~.f. l'o 17/10/2026 . -"
\ .,60~~,.,~u\ VERIFICATION :
'. (\e~'
&f()i .
0 2 JuI' fi!Ht Co•.... . . ~
. t-l ,~,oe:~'
s'~ Verified at New Delhi on t h1s _ Cfdy o'f
_" , 2025 that the contents of the above
affidavit are true to my personal knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing
material has been concealed there from .

~~
CERTIFIED~T
DEP l
Shri/Smt./Km: •. • . ... .... .....
S/o. W/o. ......... ..... ..... .................... .
DEPONENT
~i;ii:~i~~-~~-~-;ii~siri~:~{-fb~~
~~~ith~. -~~~-t~~t~ "~(·~~:~~-ffld~~-~-
have been & explained to h,{j a1 '/
ro.:e and correct to I· is knowledge VV
New Dolhi. fiNn••\) 1

2 JUL 2025
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CM APPL. _ _ OF 2025
IN NCT OF DELHI COURT FEE
DLCT0605312F2400N

MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025

IN THE MATTER OF:
1/ll ll l/lliiilllllllll
.. "
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT
VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

AN APPLICATION UNDER RULE 3 ( C) OF CHAPTER IV

(PRESENTATION OF PLEADINGS, OTHER DOCUMENTS, AND
MAINTENANCE OF CASE FILES) OF DELHI HIGH COURT (ORIGINAL
SIDE) RULES, 2018 SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-
FILING THE APPEAL.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That,'the Appellant has preferred the present Appeal against the order
dated 19.11.2024 passed by Ld. Principal Judge, Family Courts (North
West), Rohini Court, New Delhi in the matter bearing No. HMA 198 of
2017 titled as "Siddharth v. Rajbala". The contents of the Appeal may
kindly be read as a part of this application and the same are not
repeated herein for the sake of brevity.

2. That, after the initial filing, Diary Number 1915046/2025 was allotted
to above captioned matter. It is submitted that the drafting and filing
counsel was set to get married, and due to the same, and there has
been a delay in re-filing. It is submitted that there has been a delay
of q5 days in refilling .
 3. It is submitted that the delay in filing the Appeal is neither intentional
nor deliberate but due to the reasons beyond the control of the
Appellant.

4. That no prejudice shall be caused to the respondent if the delay in

filing the appeal is condoned. Whereas, great loss would be caused to
the Appellant if delay in filing the Petition is not condoned.

PRAYER

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, it is hereby most

respectfully prayed to this Hon'ble Court:-

c. delay ofq r- days in refiling the Appeal may kindly be condoned.

d. to pass any other order(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and
proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. ~

. ~~
THROUGH:

Place: New Delhi

~ J:>)9'Ld2.0tt ,
KUNAL SONI & ASSOCIATES
ADVOCATES

Date: ~.07. 2025 Counsels for the Petitioner

5-104, Lower Ground Floor,
Greater Kailash-II, Delhi- 110048
Mob. 9540666337
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CM APPL. OF 2025
IN
MAT. APP. (F.C.) _ _ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:
SIDDHARTH ... APPELLANT
VERSUS
RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT
I, Siddharth, S/o Sh. Jeet Ram, R/o E-55, Phase II, Vijay Vihar New Delhi, aged
about2:fl years do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:
1. That I am the Applicant in the above noted Application and well
conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case and as such am
fully competent to swear the present Affidavit.
2. That the contents of accompanying Application have been drafted by my
counsel under my instructions and the same has been read over to me
in vernacular and understood by me and the same are true and correct
to my knowledge, the said contents may kindly be read as part and parcel
of the present affidavit which arec51ot being reproduced herein for the
. i,e~\ the ath co;;;~~s ~ .
01
sake of brevity.
: Sl. No. 31/24 &'1.0 \ \• oJf..
;..:, · RANDHIRSINGH ?G , ~~

en\
l\0 W3-~'
'1-J\_, Ge
( *
· &.
~p. By~~~~~ti~h Court
Period From 1a
; .
DEPONENT
11012024
• \"0 "\I. ~resen . ~.f191 . ~ to 17/10/2026 ~'<o/
\(.\et'\\\~ f\ \~'fi~lr-ICATION. 0
...z...s~:··ictcourts, Ne'tJoe 1 0 JUl 2025
\ . edl~ ·
s,gn Verified at New Delhi on this _ day of_, 2025 that the contents of the above
affidavit are true to my personal knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing
material has been concealed there from.

~~
::~
t pONEf'T
CERTIFIE ..............
Snri/S-:nt.l''\ ·.. ................... ~
S/o. IJV/o .. .. .....................
p
r<IO ..........
.......... A;;:;;· ~- /U~
........
..
,eJ . ~ Y.'. ~·.,-· """1'~:
DEPONENT
Identified by Sl~ril~,~~ 1;;d ~~f·~·rer _:el at
has _solemn y .. SI. No ........ ;-:-.l ........
oe\111 ..................... , tha a!lidavil v . 1ch
that the canter ts o ta\neo to rum are
been &. ex? A./
~r~~eand correct to his knowledge If' -..
Ne~ Oelhi,(INDIA)

1 0 JUL 2025
 IN TilE COURT OF SH DINESH BHATT:
PRINCIPAL JUDGE: FAMILY COURTS:
NORTH WEST DISTRJCT: ROHINI:DELID

HMANo. 198/2017
Mr. Siddharth
S/o Sh. Jeet Ram
R/o F-75 l , 2"d Floor,
Mangolpuri, Delhi- I I 0083 Petitioner

Versus
Ms. Rajbala
W /o Mr. Siddhruth
0 /o Sh. Bodhraj
Rio F-75!, 2"d Floor,
Mangolpuri, Delhi- I I 0083

Also at:-
A-26, Lion Enclave,
Vikas Nagar, Uttam Nagar.
Delhi- l 10059
Respondent

Date of tiling of the petition 06.02.20:7

Date of institution 07.02.20 17
Date of arguments 24. 10.2024
Date of Judgment 19.11.2024

Appearances Mr. Gulshan Kumar Sharma. Ld.

Counsel for petitioner.
Ms. Meena M. Gupta. Ld. Counsel for
respondent.

PETITION FOR GRANJ' OF A DECREE

OF DIVORCE U/s 13 (1) (ia) of
f TEs· L:J
I.
MARRIAGEACT 1955ASAMENDED

. JUDGEMENT h
This is a petition u/s 13 ( I) (ia) of the Hmdu Man iagc .
1 9 FEB L_
..., r , f)
,
ZOZ5

r,
Fxor:-•nc;-
r ; ./ ~' u; ..
"':1,.."
Act, 1955 as amended for dissolution of marriage by a deer ~..::!.:.:~. ~..:_l.. ; . . . d
HMA No. l98/20 17
Page No. 1/9
Q
divorce filed by the petitioner against the respondent. Petitioner 's
case is that he was married to respondent according to Hindu
Rites and ceremonies on 28.11 .2014. Marriage was duly
consummated but no child was born out from the said wed l o~.-: ..
Petitioner and his family members had welcomed the respondent
with love, enthusiasm and affection but respondent did not
behave properly with him and used to unnecessarily quarrel with
them on petty issues. Respondent was lady of arrogrant
behaviour and addicted to metropolitan lifestyle and whenever
petitioner tried to make her understand that she should live in
proper manner, she used to start quarrel with petitioner and
threaten him to leave hi s house. Respondent used to take money
from petitioner to g ive it to he r father when he enquired about he
same, she used to get furious and threatened petitioner to send
him to jail and implicate him in fal se cases. In June, 201 5 ~
respondent left the petitioner's house stating that she was go ing
to her matrimonial house for two days thereafter did not return.
Petitioner also came to know that respondent had taken her e ntire
jewelery/valuable articles at the time when she left the house and
were sti ll in her possession. Due to the dispute, petitioner 's
family had d isowned hi m from all his movable or immovable
properties. Petitioner tried many times to settle the matter and
settlement was effected between the parties on 29.09.2015 before
Delhi Govt. Mediati on & Conciliation Centre, Rohini Delhi and
pa1t ies were ready to stay together. Petitioner had taken
respondent on rented accommodation but there too respondent
continued her conduct of abusing, harassing, torturing and
threatening petitioner. There was no ph)'sical relation between
petitioner and respondent and was living separately 111 same
house. Whenever petitioner went for job, she used to leave the

HMA No. 198/20 17

,.....,.
I

1 9 FEB 2025
,... . F.~ •-r." :v~r
· "'""'' ,., ~ '"'""v r - i: [Link]
' -· - - - - - - - - ·j
. /
~ ..

house. Respondent's intention v.:as to li ve at her parental house

and make petitioner Ghar Jamai. On 17.07.2016, when petitioner
returned back fi·om work, he did not fi nd respondent at home and
_ when he enquired from respondent's parents but they did not
di sclose. On the next morning, he came to know that respondent
was residing at her parental house. Petitioner requested her to
come back but she refused. But thereafter on 23.07.2016 she
returned on her own. He had til ed complaint before SHO P.S
Vijay Vihar on 26.07.20 16. She tortured and abused him and
caused cruelties and stated that marriage may be dissolved.

7
Respondent has fi led wri tten statement stating that
petition was not maintainable as petitioner had tiled petition on
fa lse and concocted facts. She den ied all the allegations and
stated that it was petitioner and his family members who tortured
her and was not satisfied with the dowry. On merits, she stated
that petitioner used to come home in drunken condition and
abused respondent without any reason. Petitioner and his fam ily
members always tried to expel her from the matrimonial ho:ne.
On 03.06.2015, petitioner's mother had quarreled with her and
thrown her out of the matrimonial home. She had gone to her
parental house and settled the matter before the Mediation Cel l
and had stat1ed living together but petitioner was not concerned
C' "TTT r-
e ven with the basis necessity nr ration of the responder .-------------------~
ti'
Petitioner used to beat her on petty issue and had levelled fal r\ :.: 0 I L-
allegations against respondent. She denied that she had taken <II
valuab le articles with her. Petitioner and his mother had expell1 d
19 FEB 20k_
her in wearing clothes. She denied that she had committed a ~opyin~ 1': : :mcy r:m · ,
f ·,~-; ·r

acts of cruelty and prayed for dismissal of the instant petition. Ruhini Courts, Nc.v .

HMA No. 198/2 017

Page No. 3/9
3. From the pleadings of the parties, the fol lowing issues
were framed on 30.05.201 9.

[Link] the petitioner is entitled for a decree of divorce on the

ground of cruelty as per Section l3(1Xia) ofHMA? OPP?

[Link].

4. Petitioner examined himself as PW I and reiterated the

contents of the petition and relied upon the documents i.e.,
Original marriage card Ex. PI, original rent agreement Ex. P2,
copy of e lection lD card Ex. P3 , cutting of newspaper in respect
of debarring him from parental prope11ies Ex. P4, certified copy
of mediation settlement dated 29.09.2015 Ex. P5 and copy of
c:>mplaint bearing DD No. 348 dated 27.07.2016 Mark A.

5. In his cross-exami nation, he adm itted that his marriage

with respondent was solemnized with his consent and he had not
made a ny demand of dowry. At that time, he was working as a
h~lper in a ladies suit's shop. He denied that al l the household
work /chores were done by respondent singly as there was no
maid. He volunteered that hi s mother used to do a ll the
h:>usehold chores as respondent did not do the same. He admitted
that he got married with respondent on ly because of his mother
g:>t paralytic attach and there was nobody in family to look after
h ~r. Respondent used to raise quarrel with him on petty issues
a1d give mental depression to him but he had not placed on
record any document to show that he was suffering from
d ~pression. He den ied that he did not g ive amount to respondent
for household expenses and all the expenses were borne by
respondent's parents and to11ured the respondent for bringing

HMA No. 198/2017

ESTED
19 FEB ZDL

_ _ _j

..
 /

cash from her parents. He denied that he and his family members
tortured respondent and expe ll ed her out of the matrimonial
home to pressurize her to fu lfill thei;· demands. He denied that he
was residing with his father and notin the rented accommodation.
He admitted that he approached the mediation centre for
resolv ing the di spute. He denied that on respondent's complaint,
matter was referred to mediation centre. He stated that he was not
aware ofthe complaint filed by the respondent before CAW Cell,
Rohini. He denied that he did not want to maintain marital life
with respondent therefore had taken her to rented
accommodation thereafter left her in the same and returned to teh
parental house. He was living separately from respondent lor 4
years. He denied that respondent had requested him to join his
company. He admitted that he did not pay any amount of
maintenance to respondent since the date of separation . He
admitted that all the istridhan a11ieles of respondent were ly ing in
his house. Respondent left the rented accommodation/
matrimonial home in his absence.

6. Respondent examined herse lf as RW I and reiterated the

contents of the WS and relied upon the documents i.e., Voter ID
card Ex. R l and in her cross-examination. she stated that she was r-::------=------- - -
l21h pass and could understand English litter bit. She admitted
J
that her marriage had solemnized with petitioner in a simple
manner at G urud wara. She denied that they were residing at 1 9 FEB 20Z5
Mangolpuri, Delhi on 29.09.2015. She had not filed any -~
._..v...,L ..
complaint regard ing demand of dowry and alleged ·· Delhi
petitioner and his family members before any authority. She
denied that they had never demanded dowry or committed
cruelty during her stay in the matrimonial home. At the time of

HMA No. 19812017 Page No. S/9

l
marriage, her father was working as a clerk wi th advocate @ Rs.
9,0001- per month. Presently, he was residing in a re nted
accommodation at Lions Enclave because his brotber did not
allow her to stay at her parental home as he used to dr;n:...
liquour. She was paying Rs. 2,000/- rent of her rented
accommodation. She was working as domestic he lper and her
earning was Rs. 2000- 3,000/- per month from the same. She
denied that sht: was earning Rs. 15,000/- per month fi·om her job.
She had been livi ng separately from petitioner from 6 to 7 years.
She denied that she had not tried to reconc ile the matter or to
reside with petitioner. She volunteered that she had tried to call
him many times but his mobile phone was going switched off.
She admitted that she had not fil ed any li st of dowry articles in
this case by her. She admitted that petitioner and his fami ly
members had never demanded any dowry 1i·om her except of her
mother in law sometime told her about her dowry articles. She
denied that when she was shifted in rented accommodation from
her matrimonial home a long with petitioner at Vijay Vihar she
had taken her all dowry articles. She adm itted that she had not
filed any complaint in any CAW Cell/police station or other
authorities regarding her ornamentsf jewe ll ery and other
household articles which were still lying in her matrimonial
home. She denied that her om aments/jewelery and other
household articles were not still lying in her matrimonial home.
She was working as a domestic helper for last 7 to 8 years. She
admitted that she had not moved any complaint before the CAW
Cell against the petitioner or his family members ti ll today..,...,." - - - - - - - - - ---.
mother did not visit her rented accommodatio n at Vijay Vi
(Again said Mangolpuri ).
1 9 FEB zc:st.\.---_
I
HMA No. 198/2017 .. f

_j
Issue No. 1

Whether the petitioner is entitled for a decree of divorce on the

ground of cruelty as per Section 13(1Xia) ofHMA? OPP?

7. Petitioner stated that he was married to respondent

according to Hindu rites and customs on 28.11.2014. The
marriage was duly consummated but no chi ld was born out of the
wedlock. This fact is not di sputed . Jn addition, petitioner relied
on marriage card Ex. PI to this effect. Petitioner stated that since
the date of marriage i.e., 28. 11.2014, they had given love.
affection and respect to respondent but respondent was anogant
lady, and used to metropolitan lifesty le and used to taunt the
petit ioner for simple lifestyle. Respondent used to unnecessarily
quarrel with him and she had threatened them to imp Iicate them
in fal se cases. Responde nt on her own left the rented
accommodation/ matrimonial home in J unc, 20 15 and had taken
all her be long ings. He had made severa l efforts to bring the
respondent back to matrimonial home and had approached the
mediation centre where both the parties had settled the matter on
29.09.20 15 and started resid ing together at rented
accommodation but respondent did not change her attitude and
continued to torture the petitione r. Respondent wanted to mar-~-~------
him Ghar Jamai. He also mentioned that on 17.07.2016 tli at
respondent left the rented accommodation on her own to residelat 1 9 rEB ZOZ5
her parental home but on the next morning retumed to the rentl~ ·--.. ~
accommodation. Petitioner had filed complaint before SH~ ~~~-r_ _ _ --J'·l
Vijay Vihar, Delhi and stated that respondent had ne1thcr
respected him nor provided love and affection and nor performed
her marital duties and they were also not having any physical
relation w ith each other. Respondent denied the same and made

HMA No. 198/20 17 Page No. 7/9

 I .... -.

counter allegation agai nst petitioner and hi s family members who

committed cruelty upon her and had demanded dowry and had
thrown her out of the matri monial home.
Petitioner's allegations are general 111 nature and "•
specific details including dates or specific incidents have not
been mentioned. Petitioner stated that he had tiled complaint
before PS Vijay Vihar and copy of the same is Mark A. The same
is a lso general in nature. Petitioner further stated that on
26.08.2015, her parents separated him and respondent from
themselves and also mentioned that on 23.07.2016 she on her
own had returned back to rented accommodation and she had
threatened them to implicate in false cases. Petitioner in cross-
examination of RWJ also gave suggestion that she had not filed
any complaint before CAW Ce ll / any authority or court.
Respondent mentioned that her atticles were not returned to her
and the same were still lying in her matrimonial house. However
adm itted that respondent had not fi led a ny complaint before any
authority since the date of tiling of the instant petition. In regard
to the allegation made by respondent that petitioner and his
family members had reta ined all her istridhan/jewelery/articles.
Petitioner denied the same and stated respondent had taken her
articles when she left the matrimonia l home but in his cross-
examination, petitioner admitted that respondent's istridhan were
still lying in his house. Thus allegations made by petitioner are
not only general in nature but also lack ing in speci1ic detail s and
also admitted to be not true to the extent that petitioner
mentioned in the petition that respondent had taken a ll her
atticles but in cross-exam ination admitted that they wet¥---<:tf+l-- - --==-===-=::t
lying in his house. Petitioner 's further issue is that resp Tdf~ t
was not wi lling to live in the matrimonial home and
1
was
I 19 ~E~ zo:s
Pagr~~ ~'--_- ::_"---
_
HMANo. 198/20 17
I
interested to live at her parental house and wanted to make him
Ghar Jamai but he him self mentioned that she had left the rented
accommodation/matrimonial home on 17.07.2016 but had
returned on her own on 18.07.2016 and on 26.07.20 16, he had
fi led complaint against respondent before PS Vijay Vihar when
respondent was living with him. The present petition was filed in
February, 20 17. Thus petitioner failed to substantiate any of hi s
contentions. Issue No. 1 is decided agai nst the petitioner.

8. In view of the findings on issue no. I, the petitioner has

fai led to substantiate the ground of cruelty as requi red u/s 13( I)
(ia) ofHMA. According ly, the present petition is dismi ssed.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.

File be consigned to Record Room.

Announced in open Court (DINESH BHAIT)

today i.e. on 19.11.2024 PRINCIPAL JUDGE:
FAMILY COURT:
NORTH-WEST:
ROHINI: DELID

1 9 rEo zr:s
l--

HMA No. 198/201 7 Page No. 919

 IN 1HE COURT OF SH DINESH BHA1T:
PRINCIPAL ruDGE: FAMILY COURTS:
NORTII WEST DISTRICT: ROHINI:DELin

DECREE SHEET IN PETITION FOR DIVORCI:

HMANo. 198/2017
Mr. Siddharth
S/o Sh. Jeet Ram
Rio F-75 1, 2"d Floor.
Mangolpuri, Delhi- II 0083 Petitioner
Versus
Ms. Rajbala
W/o Mr. Siddharth
Dto Sh. Bodhraj
Rio F-75 1, 2nd Floor.
Mangolpuri. Delh i- II 0083

Also at:-
A-26. Lion Enclave.
Vi kas Nagar. lJ ttam Nagar.
Delhi-It 0059 Respondent

PETITION FOR GRANT OF A DECREE OF DIVORCE U/s 13

(1) (ia) ofHINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 AS AMENDED

Petition presented on 06 .02.20 17.

This petition carne before me ((lr final disposal after
addressing of arguments b) Mr. Gulshan Kumar Shanna. I d. Counsel
for petitioner and Ms. Meena M. Gupta. Ld. Counsel for respondent.
It is ordered that the petition filed by the petitioner u/s
13 ( I) (ia) of'l iMA is dismissed.
There is no order as to cost.
Given under my hand and the seal of the Court. on th is
19. 11.2024 . 'h-
(Dinesh Bhatt)
[Link]. Family Courts.
North West District, Rohin i. Delhi

1 9 FEB zo:s
\,-.
[v~r""·""r
. . . .._,""''*: ...., \ : ..... -., :=,
, I
•

' IN i ~E COURT OF HON ' BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,

COURT , ROHINI , DELHI
IN RE:
HMA PETITION NO.: OF 2016.

IN THE MATTER OF:

SH . SIDDHARTH ... PETITIONER

Versus

SMT . RAJBALA ... RESPONDENT

INDEX

S . NO PARTICULARS PAGE NO

1 Memo of Parties
4
2 Petition U/ S-13 (1) (i) (a)
.--,
HMA Act along with
,;...- - )/
affidavit in support

3 List of

with documents
documents along
_., z. _.

~~
~ -...
4 Vakalatnama
~~ :1

\
j

DELHI PETITIONER
DATED: o/;;--/' 7

THROUGH

GOLSHAN KR . SHRAMA
ADVOCATE
CHAMBER NO: 906, 9TH FLOOR ,
LAWYERS CHAMBER B It-: "7=:=:--:::------
ROHINI COURTS, DELHI- 10085
r l)"'ckY t~ h. -hJ e
Oc.'A c..·, r\1\..k (oiJfr-t- he. Jt-
19 FEB ZOZ5
C)./v-'J io ~~ -K---.V" V.t>."'\1 b)e. 1.-=-
(0\lY.}- .
 - ~2 ~2
NCT OF DELHI COURT' FEE NCT OF 01 LHI COURT FEE
OLCT0637008l1612l OLCT0t>37067L1612L
06-0EC·2016 01-llEC-2016

~~~ ~lllllllllillllll llmmli lllllllll l~l ~~~llll l l l ~l~lll~llllllllll lrJml~m~mlll l~

XN T~~ COURT OF HON' BLE PRINCI PAL JUDGE , FAMILY

COURT , ROHINI , DELHI

IN RE: HMA PETITION NO. : OF 2016.

I N THE MATTER OF:

/ 93?w
~
J
SH. S IDDHARTH
-= -- - - , . S/0 SH. JEET RAM
1
R/0 B- 5 7/1 , IIND

... PETITIONER

. SIDDHARTH
1.-.J--~~
D/0 SH. BODHRAJ
I R/0 B-57 / 1' IIND FLOOR ,
I PHASE-I I, VIJAY VIHAR ,
DELHI ... RESPONDENT

f c
PETITION U/S-13 (1) (i - a) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE
ACT AS AMENDED UPTO DATE FOR SEEKING
- I DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY A DECREE OF DIVORCE .

==
I ::::::
~
o-<
~.o!m
§~
I' MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
(.I,. \!•,)'\'--! IJ\ }4 Lid
ll'f'-

l
1 =
I=== ~U ~ I
- .. ~~ N 1 . That th e marriage between the petitioner

L-----' .,. and respondent v1as solemnized on

2 8.1 1.2014 according to Hindu Rites and

Customs . I t was an arranged marriage and

perfo rme d in a very simpl e

manne~ ~~~------­
affi davit to thi s effect is being 'fi1ed ..._ J 1
1
I
herewith.
I 1 9 FEB ZDZ5L

I
I
L
 2 . .!.'hat the status place of residence of

the parties to the petition before tt_e

marriage and at the time of filing tte

petition were /are as under:

PETI TIONER /HUSBAND

STATUS AGE PLACE OF

RESIDENCE
At the time Unmarried 28 yrs E-55, PHASE-II,
VIJAY VIHAR,
of marr iage
DELHI
At the time Married 30 yrs B-57/1, liND
FLOOR,
of filing of
PHASE-II, VI JAY
the petition VIHAR, DELHI

RESPONDENT /WIFE

STATUS AGE PLACE OF

RESIDENCE
At the time Unmarried 29 yrs A-26, LIONS
of marriage ENCLAVE,
VIKAS NAGAR,
DELHI
At the time Married 31 yrs B-57/1, liND
of fil ing of FLOOR,
the petition PHASE-II VI JAY
I

VIHAR, DELHI

3. That the parties were Hindu at the time

of marriage and they continue to be so

eve n at the time of filing the petition.

r __
~;;-;;;:;;-:::-:--

That the domicile of the parties l!las STED

been mentioned in Para hereinabove.
19 FEB ZDt _
4. f ha t the parties to ·the petition

habited as husband and wife at the above

sai d a ddr es s and the marri a ge was duly

consummated , however no c hild is born

ou t of this wedlock .

5. That afte r t he s ol emni zation of t he

marr i age t h e r es pondent was we l come with

enthusias m, love , affection and respects

at the ma tr imon i al house by the

petiti one r a nd o t h e r family members .

6. Th a t from t h e incept i on o f 'the marriage,

t he beheviour o f t he respon d en t was not

co- operative and good t owa rds t he

petitioner and his p are n ts. The

peti tioner re ali z ed th a t the respondent

ha s not bee n ame nding herse lf and she

did not behave p r oper ly wit h the

petitioner . The re spondent n e ver g~

l ove and a ffectio n and respect to ~h: [Link]

I .
peti tione r and hi s parents and she j as 1 9 FEB ZOZ!i,.._
nev er been even an ordinary devott.e,d E.~~<Jrr.:r.c;
- · ., :\c:~r..::y
Fer..· t.. •

Wife , she used to quarrel with

L
th
':_)~H~).~-
~e----~~~--~~~
•;..·~!hi
J
 p etiti oner and his p a ren ts on pe t ty.

mat t ers and often abused them in filthy

language .

7. That it is further p ertinent t o me n t ion

here that the responden t is a lady of

arrogant, h ighl y s tand ard and

metropolitan lifest yl e, a nd she a lwa ys .

used to taunt the peti t i oner rega rding

his simple life-style.

8. That the responden t nev e r t reat ed the

petitioner with love or respect, ra t h er

she used to abuse and taunt t he

petitioner. The always used .

to give mental depression to th e

petitioner and when ever the petit ioner

tried t o make her understood , t hen she

used to pick up quarre l a nd u s ed to

threatened the petiti oner to leave

house.
1 9 FEB ZOZ5
9. That it is pertinent to mention h '--
that the family members of
 re sponden t used to interfere in the

mari tal life of the petitioner &

respondent and use d to instigate the

respondent to have quarrel in the

matrimonial life and to pressurize the

petitioner to li ve as per their

dictations and advises.

10 . That even the respondent used to take

the money fr om the petitioner and used to

give the same to her f ather, when the

petitioner enquired for the same, then the

re spondent used to get furious and

threatened the petitioner to send i n jai l

to his entire family by implicating in any

false case in court.

11. That in June, 2015, the respondent left

t hn~ .-STE: l
0
the house of the petitioner stating y. J
she was going to her mother's house ~Y · J f C
for two days , but thereafter she did dot 19 rr-n zr:"'
return back to the house of
jhe· t"' U£L I
1 -..
., /1 "- ""'V ...
r
petitioner . Thereafter , the petitioner,_ ~
.... -- --
his family members a l s o came t o know that

while leaving the house of the petitio ner,

 the respondent had also t aken away

entire belonging, valuables & jewellary

etc. with her and she left the same to her

parental house, which is still in

pos s ession of the parental family members

of t he respondent .

12. That due to all these kinds of

hara ssment , torture, misbehaviour and

arr ogant attitude of the respondent, the

p arents of the petitioner have already

severed all relations from petitioner &

re s pondent and disowned them from all

mova ble-immovable properties/assets etc.

on 26 . 08.2015.

13. That thereafter, the petitioner had

made s everal efforts to bring the

respondent b ac k in his company and also

moved an application before the D

Govt . Mediation & Conciliation Center

t here was a settlement arrived between the

parties on dated 29 . 09.2015 before

Govt. Mediation & Conciliation Center,------~--~~~J

Rohini, Delhi , whereby the parties have

..,
 §micably settled t he i r disput e an d

respondent also agreed to live /reside in

the same accommodation with the

petitioner. The copy of the same is

enclosed herewith.

14 . That thereafter the petitioner started

living with the respondent on rentedT

accommodation i.e. B-57/1, I I nd Floor,

Phase - II, Vi jay Vihar, Delhi s i n ce

15.12 . 2015 , but there too , the responden t

had not changed her conduct & behaviour.

She was still in routine of abusing,

ha r assing, torturing and threatening the

petitioner f or implic ating in fa l se c ase .

It is pertinent to mention here that

though , the petitioner & respondent are

living in a same house , but despite that

there is on physical relations

/cohabitation or any peaceful

in b etween the partie s and they are J! i ving

1 9 FEB Z025t,.._
separately in same house, becausJI t he
r r
1--
re s pondent is very cruel lady, deta1£_~ ,. pf,
"~~
. .
r
rt

which have been given in the present

--
)

1 petition.
15 . That even whenever the petitioner

to be on his job , then respondent used to

left the house and went to her parent3.1

family members . She was anyhow used to

brought by the petitioner back to the

house. The intention of the respondent was

always to live at her parental house

itself and she "''ants to make the

petitioner as "Ghar Jamai"

16. That on 17 .07 .2016, when the petitioner

reached to his house after his duty, then

he did not find the respondent at house

and e ven thereafter the petit ioner

enquired from the parents of the ·

respondent as well , but they also refused

to disclos e any whereabouts of the

respondent . But next morning i.e. on

that the respondent was staying with her,

parents and then the petitioner visited &

I 19 FEB ZOZL
requested to the house of the responder:t

with lots of efforts to bring her back,

but she refused for the same . It is

further submitted that thereafter en

.,.. <...

23 . 07.2016 the respondent herself returned

back to the house of the petitioner .

17. That it is pertinent to ment1on here

that soon after 23.07 . 2016 she returned

back to the house of petitioner, there was

more changes in the attitude, behaviour

and conduct of the respondent, as she had

become more quarrelsome & arrogant.

18. That thereafter on 26.07.2016, the

petitioner has already given the complaint

to the SHO PS: Vijay Vihar, Delhi vide DD

No.34-B, the copy of the same is enclosed

herewith.

19. That the respondent has not only

deprived the petitioner from his love and

affection and has not provided her with

his company but deliberately adopted an

r-=-----==---------.
t: ul ..... u
-r.~r· n
attitude to cause harassment/humiliation ' J

to the petitioner and his approach sine; g

FEB ZOZ5\t--
the day of marriage was n agging,
c:-. ~ ~ •• 1-f
.. ,, c- . .....,J .... rt
quarrelsome and the petitioner canL not [Link]
• ,JJ ·""'
--- ----~

reasonably afford to stay under the same

roof with him. The respondent has bee~

 proved to be a negligent wife as she
I
\
cared for the petitioner and never

cooperated with him to lead a happy

married life.

20 . That even after all the above

atrocities the petitioner and his family

members tried all their best and even

took assistance of all the elders of both

the families to solve the differences, but

of no avail. In addition to above, the

respondent started making false

accusations against the petitioner, wh ich

caused humi liations, harassment to the

petitioner and her family members.

21. That the pE;!ti tioner hails from a

orthodox ceremonies to be performed with

all devotions and to add fuel to the

sentiments

respondent
of

used to
the petitione r ,
t.J..""'-
call ...b.&.'e by means,
TESTED
1 9 FEB ZOZ\._
which caused harassmen t and humiliat iqns .
r
to the petitioner in front of her family

members, children, neighbours and othe r

society persons as a re sul t of which the

.,......, ·~

\
petitioner became a victim of

circumstances and can not bear the @

treatment meted out to her and after

waiting for considerable long time, the

petitioner has suffered lot of harassment

/ humiliat ions at the hands of respondent

and cannot afford to live under the sa:ne

roof with the respondent and all his

hopes, expectations have been shattered

because of i ndi fferent and callous

attitude of the respondent. The petitioner

has lost all hopes in her married life.

Keeping in view t he cruel acts and conduct

of the respondent and his f amily members,

and it is now not possible for the

petitioner to live with the respondent at

any cost and the respondent ha s failed to

mend hi s ways despite giving var, ou.s...

I

chances by t he petitioner in this reg9-rd..

The petitioner also apprehends danger! of. l 9 fEB ZOZS

his life at the hands of the
I
respon<;[Link]
t-
and her family members.

22. That the marriage between the parties

is dead for all pract ical purposes and the

 respondent has treated the petitioner wi

cruel ties is one or other way and now it

is not possible for t he petitioner to lead

any further the redundant relationship of

husband & wife.

23 . That the petitioner's living with the

respondent has proved to be nightmare

experiences as the acts of the respondent

have surpassed all the limits of tolerance

and the same were in no manner expected of

a civilized, educated and mentally balance

person. The respondent proved himself to

be a most whimsical and selfish pers on who .

never cared for the sentiments and

feelings of the petitioner, though the

petitioner tried to feel that it is a

ethical duty to give love, affection in

respect

genuine
of all

endeavour
but the petitioner's ~~).lch

proved fruitless l' aiid

, STE-n'
L..t - ~

stubbornness, incorporation and shims of 1 9 fE8 2~Z5 \ - - I

the respondent , even when the petitib]ler

I
I
is ready to cooperate with the respond~t.

The respondent used to abuse the

petitioner and wanted the petitioner to

-.... ' <
J. ive according to her dictates and

the petitioner should accede to all

unreasonable demands of h er without any

protest or demo.

24 . That t he date of marriage , the

petitioner in order to promote mutual

confidence, understand the sentiments , the

petitioner tried to persuade the

respondent to treat as a f riend and tried

to please her in every respects , but the

respondent refused to pay any heed to

petitioner. The petit ione r though utter

dejected, unhappy tried to provide every

comfort to the respondent but to no avail,

the conduct of t he respo ndent caused

extreme me ntal deje ction and suffering to

the petitioner and unsavo ry incidents, the

petitione r's effort s to approach the

but failed , whi ch caused mental

and humiliations , harassment t th1:9 FEB

pe t itioner. The conduct of the res 1.'
ondent
- . ,_
was totally unsuccessful, belie~- - the
entire expec tations of the petitioner on
 account of the non c ooperative attitude of

respondent, which deterred the

petitioner's desire to establish in the

marital life because of the conduct of t he

respondent.

25. The respondent made the life hell for the

petitioner. The petitioner continued to

suffer at the hands of the respondent and

respondent continued to perpetrate cruelty

and harassment on the petitioner.

26. That the petitioner has become the

victim of circumstances a nd victim of

cruelties deliberatel y inflicted by the

respondent upon the person of the

petitioner. The conduct of the respondent

s ~~
has caused a permanent ~ on the

feelings of the petitioner wh i ch is only

on account of the

hostile attitude of the respondent. ED

petitioner never li v ed happily 'wit h the 1 9 FEB l025t,__
respondent and expe ct no good

respondent because of his conduct

callous attitude. The re spondent fai l ed t o

<.

di s c ha rge his ma rital

towa rds the petitioner and deliberate ly

n e glected her on a ll counts and it :..s

further d e nied t ha t it i s not pos s ib le for

the petitioner to l i ve with the respondent

under t he same roof or to continue with.

the respond ent bond of marriage. The

petitione r h as bee n l eft with no other

option b ut to ap proach this Hon' ble court

b y way of the p r ese nt petition f or seeking

d ivo r c e from t h e r e spondent on the grouncs

of cruel ties.

27 . Tha t from the above said facts &

circumstan ces , it becomes very c lear

t hat the re s pond ent has no sanctity

towards t he petitioner and the marital

t ie a n d she is not ready to live with

t he peti tioner , infact, she is

t h ese i n h uman activities with

f amilies and is adamant to implicat

th= 1 9 FEB ZOZ5
r,__
petit ione r in many false & fri v
'"'"'nc, r
I~_ _ _• ______ jI
c ases.
 0
28. That due to such menta l torture ,

unkind, cruel and harassing conduct of

the respondent . The respondent has no

love or care or affection or any

sanctity towards this marriage. It is

very clear that the petitioner has got

all his expectation of a good married

life smashed and collapsed by such

unsocial and immoral activities of the

respondent and the petitioner sees not

to single ray of hope for a betterment

o f things, hence this petit i on .

29 . That the petitioner has not filed

the present petition in collusion with

the respondent.

30 . That the petitioner has not condoned

in any manner the cruel acts of the

respondent, wh i ch she committed against

the petitioner.

1 9 FEB ZOZ5
\..--
I,.. . ,.,.. r .
I •

L_
~-

31. That there is not unnecessary of

improper delay in filing the present

petition.

32. That there is no other ground or

lega l impediments why the relief prayed·

for should not be granted.

33 . That no any other similar petition

has been filed in any court of law.

34 . That the petitioner and respondent

are residing at Delhi, within the

territorial jurisdiction of this Hon'ble

court hence this Hon' ble Court has got

jurisdiction to try and entertain the

present petition .

35 . That the necessary requisite court

f ee has been annexed with this petition.

PRAYER

Under the circumstances of the case

and in order to meet the

justice , the petitioner

respectfully prayed that this H n ' bla 9 FEB 2025\r--

n 'F-~·

,___ .
 Court may kindly be graciously enough

dissolve the marriage of the parties

this petition by a decree o f divorce.

It is prayed accordi ngly. ~~

. rJ·c~c~/
-...J'\;;
DELHI PETITIONER
DATED: t):dl7

THROUGH

GOLSHAN KR . SHRAMA
ADVOCATE
VERIFICATION

The pe t i tioner ve rifi ed that the

contents of para 1 to 28 are true and

correc t to my personal knowledge and

believes and para no . 2 9 to 35 are for the

knowledge & information.

The last para is p raye r to this Hon'ble

Court.
. llz-/nd
Ve rified this petition on th 1s · ay o f

a~'<»'*~
February, 2017 at Delhi .

PETITIONER

ED
1 9 FEB Z0,5
~

c')"":,..~ A~ , .. ~ • r I
----·
IN T1iE COURT OF HON' BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
COURT, ROHINI , DELHI

IN RE:
HMA PETITION NO.: OF 2016.

IN THE MATTER OF:

SH. SIDDHARTH ...... PETITIONER

Versus

SMT . RAJBALA ...... RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT ... --
I , SIDDHARTH AGED ~BbOT ~O YEARS S/0 SH.

JEET RAM R/0 B-57 /1, ~IIND FLOOR, PHASE-II,

VIJAY VIHAR, DELHI, do hereby solemnly affirm

a nd de c lare as u nder:-

1. The deponent is the petitioner in the

accompanying petition and well conversant

with facts of the same.

3.

dra fted by my counsel as per my_ .).

'
instructions and same has been read over
 and explained to me in ve r nacu

language, I have understand the same.

4. That the contents of the accompanyir.g

petition may kindl y be read as part and

parcel of this affidavit, the same are

not repeated herein for the sake of

brevity.

5. That the marriage between the parties has

'\ been irretrievably broken down and t h e r e

{)' is no hope for any pat c h betwee n tie

• ~~(\Jarties.
"'e1'-~ •
~ ,...~('~... I':' . )

.... ''"''~ .
_.-;t;r'
\ 1 ,~.

Deponent

VERIFICATION 0 Irtlr"!)
J
•n•7
~ut

Verified the contents of thi s affid avit

from Para to 6 are true and correct to my
knowledge and the nothing has been concealed
therefrom.

Verified this petition on thi s

(.}~ ,..
.: · E'ebruary, 2017 at Delhi.
;; .~ .
Cr; ~ .. -· .
I ...... ~ '

1 9 FEa 10"5
o 1 rCB \:-.--
1'- ~
I---
1- . ]
 ~
6 :JI:I~;r(~
AmbUJa Tower (\lllW
[Link]
I, Hohit Kumar S/o Rnm have s~vcrcd n:lauon/debaned
~ mt 'lF'rn 91'<1) 3<ft, 4'311 Pravc•h Rio 1-423112, !heir daughll'fS Vijay Laxmi.
~ t'l'lll:'lt ~ 90 ffil!l + lhrinagar Extn . Janpur. Vcena joon. Madhu Join, Nisho
fll;wtt ,0001 • + ~ + - Badnrpur, N.D.-44 h3\·e losr Jaon and son Mukendra Jain
50
08447500960 1'\ftLA~ my ongmnl ~cn1ficatc c lass from moveable-immovable
'"""""'129782 Xrh. }ear-2012. Roll No. propenoC> due 10 !heir moscon-
C.R.-222B 8825"79 CBSE Delhi . ducl as rhey al'o rcce~>ed lheor
~ 'lli1f-mt ii '!lit [Link],1UI 0:1505617 ~hares. My clicnl shall nor be
~ 3~. 4"" ~ ~. Lost lhl oriJtinal ttrtiJicate or respon.,hle for !heir act. I.A
€81t<fC ~ 45 mt + !lf;U'lf 45 000/·(
~~R ~)
Secondary Exam. }cat 2005.
Ro ll No.-6 1.2024~ I ssue~ by
Khan Advocare D-1505621

wf "'4i<ndhti 1P •
1250
07535967598 5
07 5967056
CBSE. Dclho Ruchoka Ram 0/o
Lore Nnresh Kumar-949-Janra
'Jmrc:~a;rf C.R.-222A Flnr~. OTQ Enclave, Delhi-93 #
My client J cet Ram S/o Late
'1llW lmm '[Link] '1111<1 li;[Link] 981093611 7 D-1505641 "
~~~;: Puran Clumd Rio E-55, Vijay
r-A!4'~ ci'IH'l'Tlfilt ~55. <mil It L• notified ror the informa- Vohar, Ph.,e-11. Dellu-110085,
~ lm!C:;~Clil~ +55,000~+~~· lion !hal my original qualiliy-
Seven: all n:lauons & Debar
~~~~-­
~lFqt~~~ai
1150 ~) 070609
07535966740 j.
14368
'
10 ~ cununauoo certificare of
mam senoor secondary examo·
Son Soddhanh & hos wofe
• 1505438 naloon year 1994 roll No.· Rajbala. from all movable-
il~~;;ii~OIII Bhartya Mobil Tower 6203770 ossued by CBSE. has Immovable propenys) due 10 u:J
~iF~~qq;q­ Reg. mt am! ~;;pit:( IJ<1 'R bet.'tt actually lost Rilu VoJ 0/o !heir misconduct & misbehav- ~wu- .......

~ ~ I~IIPIR: fil;tu' r-Al~~~nl~~ B R ViJ·512rl Ge.:1a Colony. oour. My chen! will nor be :;:":~=~
,...No 21'1>A C1j
responsible for !heir any aciS.

~~··
75,00,000 + !lf;U'lf 50,000+ ~ Dclhi-31 D- 1505640 luw [Link].......
Gulshan Kumar Sharma Sh........ lhdr ..
~~~l&1 25,000/·+~ 15 <Trel 'im CBSE 'lliti\IT mt 2008,

_
Jf~nu'ICIA
vocate mG\aNe•RIIhr*"',
~ I <mf~~il{~ Contract # 09671908541. Roll No.-6435604 'l.<l Jli1I01 'Cf:l
~ ~ ~ ¥"'l '!FI .,..,_.,.,_.,
K-»ur••
,..No 01
.'Oll'lil ~qq;f.l;;ftaw:
q;lqq;~ 20 ~t
09671909441 :!1·1505439
fT.Im1 'lf;tr;t{RI11ft't <PfR,
[Link]/20081855999 <11W<1
-ij lS '1'1 f I 3W1ll ~ 3' ~~~ ~
~1m f.!<mil 1/465~66. ~-
1,~.~'131'R~ft!ll
............,_..
li...A.
([Link]

Vil'Rri~$~CR!t [Link]·P·Il ;j'q~ 1W<iR

7J1.11t"~~~ Uiillii lml<;,'llfl~~fi~ilil ..chcMWU.

~ ql~lillm· ~ ~ 7o,[Link] ~. 'I(W~5 ' m ~ ~ >n1tol "~<'~·3r.i<l

~~llo)!k.
6l~ (R~t.. II),,
70.0001· ~ • ~ + 1 . . lfl-1505647 Cowt&.Ddi·ft
tj~~7J1.1118~ mi!~'!;t~~'!;t

lcr~~l
# 09971389658 li.31R.•230 ~t•m~'ljtllil'if~[Link]~
~iF ill<:~ [Link] JU;
*"
~m9l;) lcr Mira De\i W/o Ma hendra
~~3lm'lit<m~""'
'r)lnf~~~
k ......,. ..
1(-.....,;UISMI
O..!rl'fo UHn

~tR~ '
~~~~WI
Pratap Songh R/o Vlllage-
RoJala Posr-Niyar. Do~ll.·
Varanasi (UP.) have changed ~!JClfll<hH•tUi~~p
~-1505646
....
••f•Srr.f. s.t"r,hu

fml'l,_.,.,
[Link].n,[Link]
~

nante permanenrly 10 Me<·ra ~fmi!'I~'!C'il~ 51111 s..,;tr,.~tc

~liR~ ~
miiiC(.t~ll

Son~h for all purpo,.,s. 'l.'l,-190.~.~.~ ll'l.)~lC'IC'f-•t)

-am -a llil'iiRRI 'l1f 'R ~ G 1655 '131'RT~~'~T-I"!!~~ ----~­

lro"'-'r ... ,..,.

~q;l-~ ~31 I, Sudlll'>han Jain S/o Sh. ~ ~ ;mot 'l<l-3r.l<l tl'lllt 11 ·~ ....
.&.tJ!f'll)lbc"""'
~~-

_.
r.-w.~..t ... ._
~~~fil;tu!il;ft Dh~ampal Jam Rio C-126.
~;n<t<M~'!;t~~.
S<·c -~I. Noida U.J' have ::.;-:::~
~~<Iii~
~~$~
changod m
""h
name 1rom
on 10 Voshesh Jaon for
mq-iiq;pf~~l!'t
~~~~•P
.,...........
-~aw..
, ........"
iF~~q~ • lur«, purposes ~llll!Z~ . 1>4-·c.~ !l
n.,.c,C~ Dch
'lfifiF31\118.1~~w \ ~ \1- ~-1505626
[Link] m'l1 Ql{."" 3R'I'I t
N-1505474

~~t ~ 20,13,780..
~~~q;](m~
. oll.q,'\'l"l!<mtt
~\ L \ n,~\1 '!,
,

Delhi Govt. Mediation & ConcihatH>tl L U!1_;_

Delhi Disputes Resolution Society (Regd.)
#
(Regd. No. 5/§758712009) (Established by Govt. ofNCT of Delhi!
Dept. of Law. Justice & Legislative Affairs
Sec-16. Ambedkar Bhawan. 3rd Floor Rohini. New Delhi - 110085

Page No.I of 2
Dat~ : ?.9-09-2015 F.N0.535/RMC/ D/2015/MED-31 5
IN THE MAITER OF
")idharth ... PART\ M U

Versus

Rajba la
\»resent
Mr. . idharth in person along with his counsel Mr. Gulshan Kumar. Rio - E- lS 'i. \ ijd) ' : •
Ph~1s~ - II, Sector - 4, Rohini, Delhi.
... Party No.1
Mr5. Raj bala in person along with her father Mr. Bodhraj, Rio - L - 26, Lion Enclave. Vikas
Nagar, Uttam Nagar, Delhi .
.. .. Party No.2
i'art) No. I has approached DDRS for resolution of their dispute wtth Part) No.2 thJ ~> ugh
Mediation. Accordingly Notice for appearance was sent to Party No. 2 and the P:tn: ·,
appeared in person before this Mediation Centre.
Present is a Pre-Litigauve Claim filed by the Party No.1 against the Party No.2 on account of a
matrimonial dispute. The terms of settlement of the dispure through Mediation process have hcrn
c:-.plained to both the parties. They have reaJ and understood th, ,,;, m" an . ' ·
agreement to participate in the Mediation process and the same have been sigued by "
parties. It is submitted by the parties that parties got married on 281" • 1t,\ emb~ 11:v ,
II io;; fu rther submitted by the parties that there is no issue out of the said wedlock
During the course of Mediation, the parties were heard at length and various proposals were
!!t·ncratcd. Negotiations held between the psrties. The matter has been settled voluntarily.
' amicably and without any coercion or pressure, on the following terms:-
t'hat it has been agreed by both the parties that they shall start living together in peace and
\ ham1ony.
I lilat ll ha-, been agreed and settled between the parties that Party No.1 will look 1'01 a 1.1.:,
I .. cwmmodation in Delhi on or before 30-ll-20i5 and both the parties would rl!sidc i1 • til:!.
I
[Aff8 1
~al ~: b 1
en agreed and settled between the parties that both of tner'l wil! make n! l pJ!'':Jt.k
t:tT(lrtS to tak care of the day to day needs of each other.

t' ,t'l:

/
 Delhi Govt. Mediation & Conciliation Centre
Delhi Disputes Resolution Society (Regd.)
(Regd. No. 5/6758712009) (Established by Govt. ofNCT of OelhjJ
Dept. of Law. Justice & Legislative Affair~
Sec-16; Ambedkar Bhawan. 3ill Floor Rohini, New Delhi 11008~

~~-N~). . I
Date : 19-09-2015 F.N0.535/RM C/D/20 15/i\H: D-~

l'hat it has been settled by and between the parties that they shall put their best efforts for their
ideal marital relationship and fulfill all their marital obligations towards each other.
:- 'I hat it has been agreed between the parties that any complaint/case pending before any
authority. which is beyond the knowledge of the other party stands settled/compromised by
\ irt uc of this settlement.
(, l hat the above settlement has been arrived at between the parties out of thei r own freewi 11 and
volition and without any coercion or pressure from any quarter.
7 That both the parties undertake to remain bound by the terms and conditions of tht' Jl'":'l'
settlement and lead a blissful and peaceful life.
RO &'AC ,:ffi>
~ (Party No.I)
Rajbala
(Party No.2)

Witness:-
c.~~
Mr. Gulshan Kumar (Counsel of Party No.I) Mr. Bodhraj (Father of Party No.2)

The agreement I settlement has been read over and explained to both the panies in vernacular also,
which is accepted by them to be up to their complete satisfaction.

MUKESH GOYAL
{Mediator)
The copy of the report duly signed has been given to both the parties.

lriPrioo & Cmeri= Qare

Dllbi Diepuk Resolution Society )
De,M. [Link]. , lu~tice .\ Le~qlarivf AlblR
fGm'l of N:t'""•ttlt)\p•ra r,.•TltOI)' of J)efhf
3rd Fl0111, •Jilt ., ... , , ,~·u ';urr 16.
RohMI, ~ Otftl1·110 1 Jli;~,l'el '27571~

Ddhi Covt. Mediation & ContiliAtion Centre

Amh!~l:•r 3h•wan, Sec - 16, New Dtlhi, Ph:27571b2q
r

~bx.\J~E -;-
~ I.
@
( INDIA NON JUDICIAL

Govern'!_l~nt o! . National ~a pit~ I Territory of Delhi

e-Stamp

~~
Certificate No. IN-DL76286650203027P
Certificate Issued Date 29-Apr-2017 11 .09 AM
Account Reference IMPACC (IV)/ dl760203/ DELHI/ DL-DLH
Unique Doc. Reference SUBIN-DLDL76020353225393350828P
Purchased by sushila devi
Description of Document Article 35(i) Lease- Renl deed upto 1 year
Property Description Not Applicable
Consideration Price (As.) 0
(Zero) '
>-
First Party sushila devi
Second Party sidharth
Stamp Duty Paid By sushlla devl
Stamp Duty Amount(Rs.) 50
(Filly only)

•• •••• •• •••••• •••••••••••••• •.• •••. • •• • •• ••••. Please write or type below this line •• • • ••••••••

·-'
•I
~

L---......
,1 t~
.. -.... ··--.... -..-----
·. . • . ... ...... . .. .... .......
~ .. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Statutory Alorl:
\ l h(.l authcniiLII)' ol lhtS Sramp CPrtihC.l iC shoutd be vonfted at - WYffl ShCt•t'SI~ Ifl l r ~,~ My d•wepancy In the [Link]~uls l )n lhl~ CertlfiCAt~ olUil.t·
ava•lab!f! on the ..... ensile renders 1\ 1nv~lkJ
2 1t.~ onu! ut lnC:L ~. ~ u•t l•... i•llflt.;tC:y •s on lho users of the cer1lf•cate
3 r...1s.! • any eM• t~~n<..., p:Cas~ lf\INm the Competent AuUwlnt}"
 ~~certificate NO. ENCLOSED

RENT AGREEMENT
THIS RENT AGREEMENT is made at Delhi, on this 29'" day of April 2017 between

Mrs. SUSHILA DEVI Wife of SH. RAM CHANDER resident of F-751, MANGOL PURl DELH I-110083
hereinafter called the firs t party/Landlord.

AND

Mr. SIDHARTH Son Of Sh. }EET RAM Pervious resident of B-57 / 1, SECOND FLOOR, PH-Z, VlJAY
VIHAR, DELHI, hereinafter called the Second Party/Tenant.

Whereas the first party had let out property no.- F-751, SECOND FLOOR, MANGOL PURl DELHI-
110083 to the 2nd party, under the ten ancy fo r the period of 11 month the rent deed is executed w.e.f.
24/03/2017 for 11 months.

Whereas the first party has agreed to ll't out above me nti oned property on rent to the second
party /tenant on the following terms and conditions:-

1. That the monthly rent ofRs 3,500/- (Rs. Three Thousand Five Hundred only) per month will be paid
by the second party/tenant
2. That the tenancy will commence of w.e.f. 24TH day of Ma rch 2017 for 11 months.

3. That the second party shall not sublet the said premises to any persons.

4. That the second party s hall not make any addition or alteration on the said premises without the
written consent of the first party.

5. That the second party shall not use the said premises for any purposes contrary to law but he will
use the said premises for Residential Purposes only.

6. That the use of electricity and water charges s hall be paid by the seco nd party in addition of the
above said fixed rent according to the reading of Sub-meter /meter.

7. That if the second party wants to extend the period after expiry of th e tenancy period he is liable
and responsible to pay 10o/o extra to the first party including rent amount.

:-·B-. That the second party shall not store any dangerous goods/items in the said premises.
,, ;> ..:,
- '·! , , ,# .
...... _, -..
0 ...

\ .., .. .....,.. .
.,
· ~...

..;:' r . ..... '.~ ~\ \-. ' Contd ...... ........ 2

o'i
•• r ' ,.-, ' .., ..
. ( : ·' .~. ! 'l
:1~:~
:; c'-~,'f' ,:..,..c; ))
(1
.~ d ' ~· -.~
\ ~\ !/
fo..
t ' .:
./ · .
-:--·-
\:,_, L o •
--- -
. -J
y
'"'\)1
\,--
u
-

~---.
\~ ·,_:___.. ~, -~
,. . . ., .,. . .
. .... _ j

l
·r
f)a· ~ .:·:·;: ·.:;.::::.~-
-·

.. 2 .

9. That after the expiry of tenancy period the second party wills hand over t he poss ession of the said
premises to the first party.

10. That the first party has received a sum of Rs. NIL/- as a Security, without interest, which is
refundable at the time of expiry of tenancy period. Otherwise the breakage, damages, etc. will be
deducted from the security amount.

11. That the tenant will not be authorized to challenge this agree ment or tenancy in the court c1f law in
any manner.

12. That the day today repairs such as taps and pipes etc. will have to be done by the tenant/2nd party
at their own costs.

13. That if the first party wants to vacate the said premises before the expiry of tenancy period than
firs t party will serve one month notice to the second party.

14. That if the second party wants to vacate the said premises befor e the exptry of tenancy period than
he will also serve one month notice to the first party.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Rent Agreement made at Delhi, on the day, month a nd year fi rst written
above in the presence of the following witness:-

f
I
Witnesses:- ~ ~.
~ I
LAND LORD

l'

2-~
 VAKAIATNAMA
BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT. APP. (F.C.) OF 2025

IN THE MATTER OF:

SIDDHARTH .. .APPELLANT

VERSUS

RAJBAIA ...RESPONDENT

I, Siddharth, Sf o. Sh. J eet Ram, R/o E - 55, Phase II, Vijay Vihar, New Delhi - 110085 do hereby
appoint:-

Kunal Soni, Sandeep Mishra, Ananaya Sachdeva,

Advocates & Consultants
Address: S-104, LGF, Greater Kailash-11, New Delhi- 110048
(herein after called the advocate/s) to be my/ our Advocate in the above noted case and authorized
them:

1.

1. To sign, file, verify and present pleadings, appeals, eros{

executions review revision, withdrawal, compromise or ot~_ 1373474
other documents as may be deemed necessary or proper fo1"' ~ ~
case in all its stages subject to payment of fees for each stage.··*ci·~..~·~~~_:.::;;;;::~~~
2. To deposit, draw and receive monthly cheques, cash and gran 1
all other acts a nd things which may be necessary to be done ( I NcToFoeLHtcouRTFee

3
. ~~;~~;~~~~;;~;;;;~~;;;;:;;;:~J~~:~:~~~~~~~·~J l lllmiM~UIIUiftliii!KIII
to sign the power of attorney on our behalf. -... . ·'
4· And 1/ We the undersigned do hereby agree to rectify and confirm all acts done by the
Advocate or his substitute in the matter as my/our own acts, as if done by me/ us to all
intents and proposes.
5· And 1/We undertake tha~ 1/We or my/our duly authorized agent would appear in Court
on all hearings and will inform the Advocate for appearance when the case is called.
6. The adjournment costs whenever ordered by the Court shall be of the Advocate which he
shall receive and retain for himself.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF 1/ We do her~nto set my/our hand to these presents the contentSffi...wttiiH:j..__
have been understood by me on this !. ...
day of~ vLi , 2025.

Accepted s ubject to the terms of the fees.

Advocate(s)