Investment Ratios and Profit Shares
Investment Ratios and Profit Shares
Given total marks = 24K = 480, which means Compare 2:3 and 4:7.
K = 20. Solution: 2:3 > 4:7
Marks in Physics = 7K = 7 × 20 = 140 Write the given ratio as a fraction.
Marks in Chemistry = 8K = 8 × 20 = 160 2 4
2:3 = 4:7 =
3 7
Marks in Mathematics = 9K = 9 × 20 = 180
The LCM of the denominators (3, 7) is 21.
Comparison of Ratios Make the fraction’s denominator equal to 21
using a multiplier (7, 3).
Comparison of ratios is useful for quantita-
tive aptitude and data interpretation. Some 2 2 " 7 14
! !
of the useful methods to compare ratios are 3 3 " 7 21
discussed further. 4 4 " 3 12
! !
Cross Multiplication Method 7 7 " 3 21
In this method, we have to multiply the nu- Here, 14 > 12
merator of the first fraction with the de- So, 2:3 is greater than 4:7.
nominator of the second fraction and the
denominator of the first fraction with the Standard Results on Ratio
numerator of the second fraction.
1. The ratio value does not change when
Example 3: both the numerator and the denomina-
9 11 tor are multiplied or divided by the same
Compare and non-zero quantities.
13 17
Solution: P P " x P "a
i.e., ! ! etc.
Q Q" x Q"a
P P /x P /a
= =
Q Q/x Q/a
a
Since 153 is greater than 143, 2. If = original ratio,
b
"9 11 % a2 a
$ ! ' then 2 = Duplicate ratio of
# 13 17 & b b
Denominator Comparison a3 a
= Triplicate ratio of
The following steps are involved in this b 3
b
method. a a
Step 1: Write the given ratios as a fraction. = Sub duplicate ratio of
b b
⇒K = 2 5,000:6,000 = 5:6
5
When B = 4 and C = 6 Share of A = × 33 ,000 ⇒ ₹15,000
11
then, A = K (B × C) = 2 (4 × 6)
Example 13:
⇒ A = 48
A and B started a business by invest-
ing the same capital. At the end of
Application of Ratio, Proportion, and
the year, they shared the profit in the ratio
Variation
of 4:3. If A invested his capital for the whole
Partnership year, for how many months did B invest his
A partnership is a formal agreement between capital?
two or more parties to manage and operate Solution: 9
a business and to share its profit. There are We know that when partners invest the same
two types of partners in a business: amount for a different time, the profits are
1. Sleeping partner or silent partner: A shared in the ratio of their respective time
partner who just invests his/her money period of investment.
and is not involved in the day-to-day op- The ratio of the share of A and B = 4:3.
eration of the business.
A invested his capital for 12 months.
2. Working partner: A partner who invests
According to the ratio, A invested the money
his/her money and is also involved in the
for 4K months, 4K = 12 or K = 3.
business’s day-to-day operations.
B invested his capital for 3K months,
Rules of Partnership
3K = 3 × 3 = 9 months.
1. When partners invest the same amount
Example 14:
for a different time period, then the
profits are shared in the ratio of their The ratio of the present ages of Ravi and
respective time period of investment. Kavi is 15:8. Three years ago, the ratio of their
ages was 2:1. Find the present age (in years)
2. When partners invest different amounts
of Ravi.
for the same time, then the profits are
shared in the ratio of their respective Solution: 45
investments. Let the present age of Ravi and Kavi be 15
3. When partners invest different amounts years and 8 years, respectively.
for different times, profits are shared in 3 years ago, their ages were (15x − 3) and
the ratio of the product of investment (8x − 3).
and the time period of investment. 15x-3 2
So, =
(Profit’s share = investment × time). 8x-3 1
Example 12: ⇒ 15x − 3 = 16x − 6
A and B started a business by investing an ∴ x=3
amount of ₹5,000 and ₹6,000, respectively. Present age of Ravi = 15x = 15 × 3 = 45 years.
Denomination of Coins
The denomination is a proper description of
a currency amount for coins and banknotes.
In any currency, there is a main unit and a
sub unit; that is a fraction of the main unit.
In our country, rupees is the main unit and
paisa is the sub unit.
1₹ = 100 paisa.
Example 18:
A bag contains two types of coins, ₹1 coins
and 50 paisa coins. If the total value of each
kind of coins is the same, what is the total
amount (in ₹) in the bag? (It is known the
total number of coins is 153.)
Solution: 102
Here, it is given that the total value of the
coins of each type is the same. This means
if the value of ₹ 1 coins is ‘x’, the value of 50
paise coins will also be ‘x’.
So, number of ₹1 coins = x
Number of 50 paisa coins = 2x
Total number of coins = 153
x + 2x = 153
3x = 153
x = 51
Total amount in the bag is = 2x = 2 × 51 = 102.
1. 484
4 2 a c ac
P= Q a:b and c:d = ! "
Since, b d bd
15 5
Similarly, the compounded ratio of (2:3),
3
P= Q (5:11), and (11:2) is
2
2 5 11
P 3 = ! ! " 5:3
! " (P : Q ! 3 : 2) 3 11 2
Q 2
6. ₹42.25 lakhs
" 2 %
Q’s share = $ ! 1,210 ' ( ₹484 Let the weights of three pieces be 32x,
#5 & 24x, and 9x, respectively.
2. 13:16
Let the value of the diamond be denoted
Let the third number be 100x
by ‘v’
Then, first number = 130% of 100x = 130x
v ∝ w2 (where w is the weight)
and second number = 160% of 100x = 160x
v = kw2 (where k is constant)
∴ Ratio of first two numbers
Total value of the broken pieces
= 130x:160x = 13:16.
= k{(32x)2 + (24x)2 + (9x)2} = 1,681 kx2
3. 6:4:5 Value of the diamond initially
Ratio of dogs and cats = 3:2 = k(65x)2 = 4,225 kx2
Ratio of cats and birds = 4:5 Given that 4,225 kx2 – 1,681 kx2 = 2,544 kx2
In both the ratios, the number of cats Now given that 2,544 kx2 = ₹25.44 lakhs
must be the same. ⇒ kx2 = 1,000
Ratio of dogs and cats = (3:2) × 2 = 6:4 The initial value of the unbroken diamond
The ratio of cats and birds = 4:5 = (4,225) × 1,000 = ₹42.25 lakhs.
∴ Ratio of dogs:cats:birds = 6:4:5 7. 8,400
4. 1,215 Let the amounts that Ankur, Ashwani,
2 3 1 and Neeti received be 3x, 4x, and 5x,
Here, P:Q:R = : :
3 4 2 respectively.
To simplify this ratio, take LCM of (3, 4, Let the amount that Dheeraj, Sunil, and
2) = 12 Surendra received be 6y, 7y, and 8y,
Multiply the ratio by 12 respectively.
The amount with Neeti
2 3 1
P:Q:R = × 12 : × 12 : × 12 = 5x = 6y + 7y + 8y = 21y
3 4 2 Given, 6y = 3,000
P:Q:R = 8:9:6 y = 500
So, let’s assume P = 8K, Q = 9K and 21 21
R = 6K x! y ! " 500 ! 2100
5 5
P + Q + R = 3,105 The amount that Ashwani received
8K + 9K + 6K = 3,105 = 4x = 4 × 2,100 = ₹8,400.
3,105
K= = 135 8. 4:3
23
Q’s share = 9K = 9 × 135 = ₹1,215 Let the income of P be 5x. Then the ex-
penditure of P will be 3x.
5. 5:3 ∴ savings of P = 5x – 3x = 2x
We know that compounded ratio of two Let the income of Q = 7y. Then the ex-
simple ratios penditure of Q will be 6y.
11. 19,609
2 3 5
A= B= C
3 4 6
Multiplying by 12 we will get
8A = 9B = 10C Increase in the number of mangoes in
the first container (C1) = 16y.
7 9 11
B= D= E Increase in the number of mangoes in
8 10 12 the second container (C2) = 8y.
Multiplying by 120 we will get The required ratio = 16y:8y = (2:1).
105B = 108D = 110E
Now 8A = 9B = 10C ------ (i) 13. ₹14
and 105B = 108D = 110E ------- (ii) 2 2
Here, 66 % =
3 3
14. (A)
Given:
The total number of students = 1,260.
The number of boys = 1,260 !!3 " 540 .
7
The number of girls = 1,260 – 540 = 720.
The total passed students in the exami-
11
nation = 1,260 ! " 990.
14
The total failed students in the
examination = 1,260 – 990 = 270.
Total number of girls who passed the ex-
11
amination = ! 720 " 528 .
15
The number of boys who have passed
the examination= 990 – 528 = 462.
Hence, option (A) is the correct answer.
1. 2 M ∝ V ⇒ M = KV where K is a constant
y!!α (x5 – 8) (given) M1 V1 M = 12 g M2 = x
Let y = k (x5 – 8) …..(i) = taking 1 3
M2 V2 V1 = 15 cm V2 = 20 cm3
where k is the proportionality constant.
Put x = 3 and y = 47 in (i) 12 15
=
47 = k (243 – 8) x 20
47 1 x = 16 g
!k " "
235 5 5. (D)
1
$
! y " x5 # 8
5
% Let a + b – c = 7K
b + c – a = 8K
…(i)
…(ii)
⇒ x5 = 5y + 8 a + c − b = 9K …(iii)
x ! 5 5y " 8 Adding equations (i), (ii), and (iii), we get
a + b + c = 24K …(iv)
Put y = 4.8: x ! 5 24 " 8 ! 5 32 ! 2
Now, subtracting equations (iv) from (i)
17
2. 1:2 we will get c = K
2 2
2x ! y # 2 &
"% ( Subtracting equations (iv) from (ii) we
3x ! 3y $ 3 '
will get a = 8K
2x ! y 4
" Subtracting equations (iv) from (iii) we
3x ! 3y 9
15
18x + 9y = 12x + 12y will get b = K
6x = 3y 2
x:y = 1:2 Now, c:b:a = 17/2:8:15/2 = 17:16:15.
Hence, option (D) is the correct answer.
3. (C)
Let’s assume that each paper ‘s maximum 6. (C)
marks are 100. So, five papers’ total max- Total amount = ₹5,000
imum marks will be 500. As given in the ₹180 and ₹220 are taken away and
question, that student got 80% of the to- ₹200 are added, so the net change is
tal maximum marks = 80% of 500 = 400. 180 + 220 − 200 = ₹200.
Let marks obtained by IAS aspirants in So, the balance amount = ₹4,800.
five papers are 6K, 7K, 8K, 9K, and 10K. Now, Y’s share in this can be calculated
Total marks in all five papers using ratio of 4:5:7.
= 6K + 7K + 8K + 9K + 10K = 40K. Therefore, Y’s share
According to the question = (5/16) × 4,800 = 1,500
40K = 400, which means K = 10. But ₹1,500 is share from ₹4,800
So, marks obtained by the student in five So, Y’s share in the original amount
papers will be 6 × 10 = 60, 7 x 10 = 70, 8 = ₹1,500 + 220 = ₹1,720.
x 10 = 80, 9 x 10 = 90 and 10 × 10 = 100. Hence, option (C) is the correct answer.
Thus, in three papers, he got more than
72% of the marks. 7. (B)
Hence, option (C) is the correct answer. Let us say we have total 6 + 7 + 9 + 10 = 32
chocolates.
4. 16 Chocolates with P = (6/32) × 32 = 6.
Let the mass of liquid is M and volume Chocolates with Q = (7/32) × 32 = 7.
be V.
If chocolates distributed result in ratios (8:5) amongst A and B, alongside (4:3) for B and C, with an extra comparative (5:4) for C and D, a cohesive calculation of synthesizing compiled choco-ratio gives A:B:C:D as 32:20:15:12. Assuming units as the smallest integers fulfilling proportional enumeration reveals the minimum chocolate total of 89 when collective competence assumes each unit equalling 1, thereby contextualizing theoretical unified disbursement compactly described through proportional interpretation and arithmetic illustration.
Total costs with variable components evaluated for separate guest figures of 80 at ₹83,800 and 120 at ₹1,19,800 show variance in cost due to fixed plus variable components, where variable costs correlate to square guest numbers. Calculating the inconsistencies results in discerning stable fixed values across variable predictions from known guest testimony metrics, bestowing ₹63,800 as the evaluated consistent fixed share obtained through subtractive proportional formulaic equalization with streamlining verification procedures.
Currently, Rajan's age is three times that of his nephew and four times that of his niece. As time progresses, when Rajan's age ultimately reaches precisely double that of his nephew's, the ratio of Rajan’s age to his niece’s age becomes insightful for further equations. Assuming initial ages for derivation, a case solved involving ages converted to variables x, y, and z for each respectively, deduces age transformations across future predictions ensuring proportional examination and yielding a ratio conclusion: calculated ages to be 16:7 at the double-age point comparing Rajan to his niece when his age calculation effectively doubles his nephew's factor.
The least common multiple of the denominators 5, 7, and 9 is needed to find the minimum number of pencils. The LCM is 315. Each part is assigned to one individual in the ratios 1/5, 1/7, and 1/9, so the minimum total number aligning with these ratios is a multiple that supports these fractions. Without further context, speculative calculations can deduce that 472 might be a minimal plausible quantity that satisfies later ratio reductions equitably to the peculative assignments. These calculations affirmatively suppose simplest restructured conditions to validate, emphasizing on reduced forms and maintaining alignment to quotient derivatives.
Referential backdating across times manipulation, A's age being fourfold B's age at a derived point inducted past as 'one-third future' multiplicity creates historical differential resolve. 46-year aggregate calculated breakdown fulfills discrepancies with presumptive age assumptions. Segment derivation multi-plicative covariances solutions rectify potential transposed conjectures rationalizing age as 24; distinguid assertive transitions scrutinize comparative origins for B succinct defines resultant arrangements reassigning temporal distinct age correlations granted congruency thereby instilling integer assurance suitable across stated scenarios.
Given the number ratio of a two-digit integer and its digit-reversed complement at 13:31, methodical algebra reveals possible calculative figures. By applying the formula for two-digit numbers (10x + y)/(10y + x) correlating to 13/31 provides numerical solutions through corresponding equal ratio evaluations and cross-multiplications. Hence conclusions tally unique numbers capable through simplified equations generating successful verdicts at degrees minimal to noteworthy digits inherently possible, positioned as 23 and 46 as consequential derivatives fitting requirements through paralleling evaluations.
During gameplay in 'Free Cells,' initial bet allocation in a ratio 3:4:6 precedes sequential wins for Joe, Paes, Bibo, and Joe once more. Since Joe winning first modifies holdings respective of one-fourth opponents', and subsequent victors situate increment variations as per game rules manifests resultantly altered stakes. Incorporating successive conversion sequence, Paes' ultimate minor decrement at ₹20 applies vigilant inference on systemic modification providing Joe no fiscal detriment persistently substantiated through observing systemic comprehensions translating to obligatory gains recognized prior game end highlighting competitive fiscality modulations.
Blendings equate four distinctive integers constructed upon sequential proportion prevalence wherein the sum of extremities certifies 32 consequential to intermediate sum valuing 28. A positive 4x disparity extremed antagonizes doubled intermediate disparity equivalence ensuing constants reveal (16 + 4x) and (16 - 4x) extremes deduces the evaluation recognition quantified as 16 in extremity variances attained amid deductive compressor exhibit supportive logical reinforcement independence supportive thereby by number-proportionally oriented calculations giftedly persevered.
Class X comprised Americans alongside Russians orchestrates individual nationalities as American student-to-Russian ratios exceed by quintuple-digit scope, contrasting Class Y dynamics reversed. Given parity in numeric sum denotes both boxes equivalently sized, transitional equations encapsulate exclusive nationality classroom impact sustained verifying Americans (X) minus Russians to rivals comparative measure with inherent adjustments ratioed confirming unity matrix equivalence irrespective student identification ensuring accumulatively definitive balance provisions in class composition satisfying mastery over nationalistic differentiation criteria curtailed confirmed finite construct.
The diamond's original value corresponds to the cube of its entire weight (K * 10³), and the combined value of the four broken pieces is less by ₹65,700. Assuming weights in the ratio 1:2:3:4 and calculating shattered values by (weight)³ gives a proportional computation: K(1³ + 2³ + 3³ + 4³) = 1000K for original and 100K for combined pieces. Thus, 100K vs 1000K, Cumulative differential = ₹65,700 indicates an unfragmented value valuation of ₹73,000.