Scribd
Upload
25 views2 pages

Selective Attention and Stroop Effect Analysis

The document discusses selective attention and its theories, including Broadbent's Filter model and Treisman's Attention Model. It also covers the Stroop Effect and various theories explaining it, such as selective attention theory and automaticity. Results are presented in tables detailing participant performance in terms of time taken and errors committed for congruent and incongruent lists.

Uploaded by

nikhiljames2017
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views2 pages

Selective Attention and Stroop Effect Analysis

The document discusses selective attention and its theories, including Broadbent's Filter model and Treisman's Attention Model. It also covers the Stroop Effect and various theories explaining it, such as selective attention theory and automaticity. Results are presented in tables detailing participant performance in terms of time taken and errors committed for congruent and incongruent lists.

Uploaded by

nikhiljames2017
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

General Introduction

Selective Attention (Heading)

●​ Selective attention (with intext citation)


●​ Cognitive inhibition (with intext citation)
●​ Theories of selective attention (with intext citation)
1.​ Broadbents Filter model (1958)
2.​ Triesman Attention Model (1964)

Specific Introduction
Stroop Effect (Heading)

●​ Stroop Effect (with intext citation)


●​ Theories of stroop effect (with intext citation)
1.​ Selective attention theory
2.​ Speed of processing theory
3.​ Automaticity/ Automatic word recognition theory
4.​ Parallel Distributed processing

Result

Table 1.1 indicates the total time taken and no. of errors committed by the participant for congruent list
and incongruent list in stroop effect.
Total time taken for congruent list=
Total time taken for incongruent list=
Errors committed in congruent list=
Errors committed in incongruent list=

Table 1.2 indicates the participant performance of the group in stroop effect
Average time taken for congruent list=
Average time taken for congruent list=
Total number of errors committed in congruent list=
Total number of errors committed in in congruent list=
Table 1.1
Total time taken and no. of errors committed by the participant for congruent list and incongruent list in
stroop effect.

_________________________________________________________________________
Time taken Errors committed
_________________________________________________________________________

Congruent List

Incongruent List

_________________________________________________________________________
Difference
_________________________________________________________________________

Table 1.2
Participant performance of the group in stroop effect
____________________________________________________________________________
Si. Initial TT for TT for Errors Errors
C list inC list C list inC list
____________________________________________________________________________
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
___________________________________________________________________________

Average TT ______ ______


___________________________________________________________________________

Total ______ ________


___________________________________________________________________________

You might also like