Process Safety Competency Overview
Process Safety Competency Overview
3. Competency
Key Lessons:
What is the process safety competency & why is it
important.
Competence of process safety hazard and human
barriers
Key principles and essential features.
Possible work activities.
Copyright © 2023, ENPPI Training Academy. All rights reserved.
What is it?
Process safety competency is the capability to apply or use a set of related
process safety knowledge, skills, and abilities (fit for work) required to
successfully perform critical process-related functions or tasks. This
includes the perception of the process safety hazards associated with
operations activities, and the hazards that could result in process safety
events.
The process safety competency process means all efforts associated with
develop, maintain, improve, and broaden of knowledge and expertise
through encompasses interrelated actions include continuously improving
knowledge & competency, ensuring that appropriate information is
available to people who need it, and consistently applying what has been
learned.
Why Is It Important?
Catastrophic process safety incidents are relatively rare, the losses
associated with the incidents can be devastating.
Learning must be proactive, and lessons must not be forgotten. Business
seems to be changing at an ever-increasing rate.
Acquisitions, divestitures, reorganizations, and resignations of key
individuals make it more difficult than ever to maintain competency simply
by relying on the knowledge in people’s heads. Simultaneously, the growth
in information technology enables businesses to efficiently control, expand,
and manage a storehouse of information and access this information from
Copyright © 2023, ENPPI Training Academy. All rights reserved.
How is it done?
Unlike some of the other RBPS elements, no simple answer exists as to
“how” competency is “done.”
The single most important factor is a commitment by senior management
to support efforts to learn, and to share new information and insights
among units at a facility, with sister facilities within the company, and
potentially with other companies.
Once the commitment is in place, opportunities to learn and interact with
others abound. Some information will have to be passed along through
mentorship and collaboration; both of these activities typically require
Copyright © 2023, ENPPI Training Academy. All rights reserved.
SUMMARY
On April 21, 1935, a blender containing a mixture of sodium hydrosulfite,
aluminum powder, potassium carbonate and benzaldehyde exploded,
which led to a major fire at a specialized chemical plant in Lodi, New Jersey,
USA. Five employees were killed and many more were injured.
The investigation team identified the causes and contributing factors as :
Inadequate risk analysis, and appropriate precautions.
Inadequate operating procedures, and insufficient training of operators.
The decision re-load the mixer was based on insufficient information.
The mixer used was not suitable for chemical blending.
There was insufficient communication between the plant and the designer
company of the chemical blending technology for the used materials.
Training of fire members and emergency responders was insufficient.
Key Principles
Efforts to better understand and manage risk will produce other more
tangible benefits. For example, the same loss of institutional knowledge
that can lead to a repeated process safety incident likely leads to even
more frequent losses associated with lower yield and output, higher
maintenance costs, increased quality defects and customer complaints.
Closely linking efforts to maintain and enhance process safety knowledge
with efforts to maintain and enhance competency throughout the
organization should result in direct financial benefits.
Develop a learning plan.
the learning plan is:
1. Incorporates the results of uncertainty cataloging, which is proactively
asking, “What else might we need to know and what benefit might this
information provide?”
2. Spells out assumptions about each uncertainty.
3. Presents approaches for testing each assumption and resolving each
critical uncertainty through experimentation and learning.
4. Prioritizes the assumption-testing tasks and defines a path for moving
forward as quickly and inexpensively as possible.
5. Serves as a log of efforts to maintain competency and a reference for
future learning plans.
Document knowledge.
One means to sustain and share knowledge is to document information in a
technology manual.
Documenting process-specific knowledge is increasingly important during
this era of divestitures, acquisitions, and other rapid transitions.
Ensure that information is accessible.
every agency must have information posted on their internet sites and a
search engine can be used to locate relevant documents.
Copyright © 2023, ENPPI Training Academy. All rights reserved.
Provide structure.
Even if information is well communicated when it is developed or
discovered, the need for this information may not be immediate.
Push knowledge to appropriate personnel.
Developing and maintaining a network of process safety professionals
provides a means to “push” new information throughout the corporation.
Apply knowledge.
While efforts to stockpile useful information and promote learning should
be applauded, they hold little meaning without proper application.
Update information.
Keeping information up to date can be even more difficult than providing
structure to facilitate searches.
Promote person-to-person contact.
Workers must apply rules, skill, and knowledge to successfully execute their
daily activities. Rules can be read, and skills can be practiced, but
knowledge and understanding, which can be critical to recognizing hazards
and managing risk, normally requires interaction with subject matter
experts.
D. Adjust Plans
Surveys on the usefulness of attending technical meetings.
Periodically review the status of efforts to promote process safety
competency. With one eye looking toward what is currently working well
and the other focused on upcoming challenges, revise the plans to more
closely align the activities with the perceived needs.
Copyright © 2023, ENPPI Training Academy. All rights reserved.
Suggested KPIs
• Number (or %) of technology steward Unstaffed positions are an indication that the facility
positions that are currently staffed or business unit does not value maintaining process
safety competency.
• Staff-hours (per year) devoted by the This metric will indicate the level of effort devoted
technology steward to face-to-face to maintaining and enhancing process (and process
contact with operating units. safety) competency; a downward trend over time
may indicate a lapse in management support.
• Frequency with which incident This is a direct measure of process safety
investigation teams determine that the competency; however, because of the low
basic physical or chemical phenomenon frequency of process safety incidents (including near
that caused an incident was not known miss events), significant lag may exist between a
within the organization. decline in competency and a noticeable change in
this metric.
• Use of the technology manual (“hits” if A steady upward trend indicates that facilities find
it is implemented in a web-based the technology manual useful; conversely, a steady
fashion). downward trend may indicate that the information
is hard to locate, out of date, or otherwise not
relevant.
• Average response time for questions An upward trend in response time may indicate
posed to the technology steward or insufficient resources, with the potential for
center of excellence. complete failure of this system as a result of a loss in
interest at operating facilities and/or less than
adequate resources to maintain competency or
provide current and accurate information.
• Staff/hours (per year) devoted by the . A steady downward trend (or steep decline) may
technology steward to supporting indicate that facilities do not value this resource,
troubleshooting efforts for/with each that the resource is not effective, or that
operating unit management does not support efforts to spread
knowledge between facilities.
• Number of questions posed to the A steady upward trend may indicate that facilities
center of excellence per unit time. find this to be an effective resource, or it may
indicate a loss of competence at operating facilities.
• Ratio of process changes to updates to A decrease in this metric may be an early warning
the technology manual that the information in the technology manual is not
being maintained current and accurate.
• Number of futilities or business units This metric is a direct measure of management’s
within the company that maintain up- commitment to maintaining competence in key
to-date succession plans. positions. Note that these plans are typically
updated periodically, rather than continuously, and
personnel can reasonably expect that the plan will
be updated as scheduled.
Copyright © 2023, ENPPI Training Academy. All rights reserved.
• Pareto analysis of the topics discussed The fraction of questions that address a particular
with the technology steward or with subject should be considered when planning for
centers of excellence or researched future efforts to invest in competency and/or
using the technology manual (assuming developing the learning plan for future years.
it is web-based).
• Opinion surveys on how technical Surveys may provide a reliable and easy to execute
information is stored and the efficacy of method for evaluating the effectiveness of
searches. information storage and retrieval mechanisms
• Opinion surveys about the Although achieving consistency in polling is likely
organization’s competence, including difficult, particularly over time, a decline in the
opinions on the trend over time. organization’s perception of its competence should
be closely examined.
organization’s performance.
Review the list of technology stewards. Query supported facilities to
determine if technology stewards are providing support as needed.
Review a representative sample of technology manuals to determine if they
are (1) up to date, (2) accessible, and (3) user friendly.
Review succession plans for key personnel, including:
1. The management team at each facility.
2. Technology stewards.
3. Key members of each center of excellence.
4. Process safety professionals and RBPS element owners.
5. Key technical staff.
Review training and development plans for personnel who have been
identified as candidates for key positions.
Examine the process for determining and maintaining the expertise
required to safely operate the facility.
Discuss any known upcoming changes in key staff positions or senior
technical positions, and confirm that appropriate transition plans are in
place.