Single Variable Calculus Problem Set 1
Single Variable Calculus Problem Set 1
If a sequence (x_n) has no convergent subsequence, then it implies that as n approaches infinity, 1/x_n converges to 0. This is because without a convergent subsequence, the sequence must be unbounded, thus driving the limit of 1/x_n to 0 .
The supremum of the set S1 = {1/n : n ∈ N} is 1, and the infimum is 0. This is because the sequence ({1/n) decreases monotonically as n increases. Therefore, the largest value approached by the elements of the set is 1 (when n=1) and the smallest limit value (as n approaches infinity) is 0 .
The sequence given by xn := n2/(n2 + n) converges because as n becomes very large, the n term in the denominator becomes negligible compared to n2. Hence, xn approaches n2/n2 which simplifies to 1. Therefore, the limit of the sequence as n approaches infinity is 1 .
The sequence (x_n) = sin(nπ/2) does not converge because its values cyclically oscillate among the values 1, 0, -1, and 0. Since it does not approach a single value, it fails to meet the criteria for convergence .
The statement is TRUE. If (x_n) is convergent and (y_n) is not convergent, then the sequence (x_n + y_n) cannot be convergent. This is because the lack of convergence in (y_n) implies that there is no single real number such that (x_n + y_n) approaches that number as n → ∞ .
The sequence defined by x1 = 2 and xn+1 = 2 + 1/xn is bounded and monotonic, which implies convergence. By setting the limit L of (x_n) and substituting L for both xn and xn+1, we get the equation L = 2 + 1/L. Solving for L yields L^2 = L + 2, simplifying to (L-2)(L+1) = 0. Thus, L = 2 or L = -1. Since the terms are positive, the limit is L = 2 .
The infinite series given by (x_n) = 5/n^(3/2) converges to 0 as n approaches infinity. As n becomes very large, the term 5/n^(3/2) diminishes because the exponent 3/2 ensures a rapid growth rate of the denominator. Thus, the limit is 0 .
If both (x_n) and (y_n) are unbounded sequences in R, the product sequence (x_ny_n) cannot converge because as n approaches infinity, the unbounded nature of the sequences means that (x_ny_n) will also be unbounded or oscillate without approaching a specific limit .
The sequence xn = n^1/n converges to 1 as n approaches infinity. This is shown by considering the function f(x) = x^(1/x) for x > 0, which has a limit of 1 as x approaches infinity. This can be intuitively understood by recognizing that as n increases, the influence of 1/n in the exponent makes the expression approach 1 .
The statement is TRUE. For a monotonic sequence (x_n), if (x_n^2) is convergent, then (x_n) must also be convergent. This follows from the fact that a monotonic sequence that is bounded will converge, and if (x_n^2) converges, then (x_n) must be bounded .