Soil Temperature Damping Depth in Boreal Plain Forest Stands
and Clear Cuts: Comparison of Measured Depths versus
Predicted based upon SWAT Algorithms
G. Putz and B.M. Watson
Civil & Geological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
J.A. Bélanger
Faculty of Engineering, Lakehead University
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
E.E. Prepas
Faculty of Forestry & the Forest Environment
Lakehead University, Thunder Bay
FORWARD Project: Boreal Plain Watersheds
14 long term forest watersheds
6 reference, 3 burned, 5
harvested
2 Large Scale (129 & 247 km2)
12 Small Scale (2.6 to 15.6 km2)
6 additional MPB watersheds
Boreal Plain
Boreal Plain forest
325 to 625 mm ppt annually
1/4 as snow, spring melt
Sporadic storms May to Sept.
Upland dominated by lodgepole pine, Predominantly deep clay till soils
trembling aspen, white spruce and (luvisols)
balsam poplar Wetlands and organic soils in
Lowlands dominated by black spruce low areas (histosols)
and tamarack
Watershed Harvest – Winter of 2003/2004
Soil Temperature and Water Content Monitoring
18 Automated Sites (2005/06)
• 3 Upland Harvest Sites
• 3 Upland Wildfire Sites
• 3 Upland Deciduous Sites
• 3 Upland Conifer Sites
• 3 Lowland Shallow Peat Sites
• 3 Lowland Deep Peat Site
Continuous Monitoring
• Temperature @ +2000, 0, 100,
300, 500, 1000, 2000 & 3000 mm
• Water Content @ 100, 500 &
1000 mm
Soil Temperature versus Time and Depth
20
Harvested Site - H1
4 years post harvest
15
Soil Temperature ( C )
100 mm
o
10
300 mm 1000 mm
2000 mm
3000 mm 3000 mm
5
100 mm
labels indicate depth in soil profile
-5
01-Jan-08 20-Feb-08 10-Apr-08 30-May-08 19-Jul-08 07-Sep-08 27-Oct-08 16-Dec-08
Date
Soil Water Content versus Time and Depth
60%
Harvested Site - H1
4 years post harvest
50%
1000 mm
Soil Water Content (%)
40%
500 mm
30%
20%
10%
100 mm
labels indicate depth in soil profile
0%
01-Jan-08 20-Feb-08 10-Apr-08 30-May-08 19-Jul-08 07-Sep-08 27-Oct-08 16-Dec-08
Date
Soil Temperature Equation in SWAT
Tsoil z , d n Tsoil z , d n 1 1 df TAAir Tssurf Tssurf
Tsoil(z, dn) soil temperature at a specific depth z (in mm) on the current day
Tsoil(z, dn-1) previous day’s soil temperature
λ lag coefficient
df depth factor
TAAir average annual air temperature based on long-term data
Tssurf soil surface temperature on the current day
All temperatures in oC
Damping Factor and Damping Depth Definition
zd
df
zd zd 0.867 2.078 zd
exp
df
zd exp 0.867 2.078 zd
df depth factor for a soil layer
zd unitless depth ratio given by z/dd
z depth at the center of the soil layer
dd damping depth
Neitsch et al. (2005) define dd as the depth in the soil profile
at which the soil temperature is within 5% of TAAir.
Damping Depth Equations
2500 b
dd max 1000
b 686 exp 5.63 b
SW
0.356 0.144 b ztot
500 1 2
dd dd max exp ln
dd max 1
ddmax maximum damping depth.
b bulk density of the soil in Mg/m3
scaling factor based upon the water content of the soil
SW/ztot water content in the soil profile in mm/mm
SW water in the soil profile expressed as depth in mm
ztot depth of the soil profile in mm.
Air and Soil Temperature Range – H3, 2009
-3.0
Harvested Site - H3
2009 Air Temperature @ 2 metres
-2.0
-1.0
Averages
Depth (m)
0.0
Minimums Maximums
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
-40.0 -30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
Temperature ( oC )
Air and Soil Temperature Range – C2
-3.0
Conifer Site - C2
-2.0
Air Temperature Range
-1.0
Averages
Depth (m)
0.0
Minimums Maximums
1.0
2006Min 2006Max
2.0 2006Avg 2006 Air
2007Min 2007Max
2007Avg 2007 Air Soil Temperature Range
2008Min 2008Max
3.0 2008Avg 2008 Air
2009Min 2009Max
2009Avg 2009 Air
4.0
-40.0 -30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
Temperature ( oC )
Revised Damping Depth Definition
average
temperature Avg. air temp. 20 oC
ground surface
Within 1 oC
Depth
minimum
temperature maximum
Damping Avg. air temp. 2 oC
Depth
temperature
Within 0.1 oC
within 5% of avg.
air temperature Propose range of
2 oC to define the
damping depth
Nominally ±1 oC
Temperature
Determination of Largest Damping Depth
9.0
Harvested Site - H3
8.0 2009
7.0
6.0
5.37 m depth for
2 oC range in temperature
Depth, m
5.0
4.0
y = 8.1737e-0.2103x
3.0 R2 = 0.9945
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Temperature Range in Active Zone ( oC )
Largest Damping Depth and Average Soil Water Content
Conifer Site - C2 Deciduous Site - D1 Deciduous Site - D3
avg. air WC @ avg. air WC @ avg. air WC @
temp. dd 1m temp. dd 1m temp. dd 1m
o o o
Year C m % C m % C m %
2006 2.3 4.98 39% 2.4 5.61 40% 0.5 4.13 36%
2007 0.6 4.59 41% 1.7 5.80 41% 1.8 3.93 38%
2008 3.4 4.37 41% 1.4 5.11 41% 2.9 4.17 37%
2009 0.8 4.32 39% 0.9 5.16 40% 1.7 4.34 34%
avg. 1.8 4.57 40% 1.6 5.42 41% 1.7 4.14 36%
range 2.8 0.66 2% 1.6 0.69 1% 2.4 0.41 4%
Damping Depth vs. Soil Moisture Content
10000
2500 b
dd max Base Depth
9000 b 686 exp 5.63b
SW
8000 0.356 0.144 b ztot
500 1 2
7000 dd dd max exp ln
dd max 1
Damping Depth (mm)
Bulk Density = 1.45 Mg/m3
6000
Base Depth = 7000 mm
5000
Range in damping depth
4000
3000
Range in soil moisture
2000 Range in damping depth
Bulk Density = 1.45 Mg/m3
1000
Base Depth = 1000 mm
0
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
SW/ztot (soil moisture content)
Comparison of Largest Damping Depths
6.0
(3.87 to 5.67 m)
Range based upon 5.0
modified Eq.5 with
constant = 7000 mm
4.0
Largest Annual
Damping Depth (m)
3.0
(1.85 to 2.35 m)
Range based upon
original Eq. 5 with 2.0
constant = 1000 mm
1.0
0.0
Conifer C2 Deciduous D1 Deciduous D3 Harvest H3 Harvest H1
2006 4.98 5.61 4.13
2007 4.59 5.80 3.93 5.32 4.89
2008 4.37 5.11 4.17 5.19 4.87
2009 4.32 5.16 4.34 5.37
Site Type
Predicted vs. Observed Soil Temp., 0.1 m, H3
25
Harvested Site - H3
0.1 m depth
20
15
Soil Temperature ( C)
o
10
Observed
0
-5
Original
Observed Soil Temp
Original dd SWAT
Modified
-10
Modified dd SWAT
-15
19/Aug/06 27/Nov/06 7/Mar/07 15/Jun/07 23/Sep/07 1/Jan/08 10/Apr/08 19/Jul/08 27/Oct/08
Date
Predicted vs. Observed Soil Temp., 1.0 m, H3
20
Harvested Site - H3
Observed Soil Temp
1.0 m depth
Original SWAT
15
Modified SWAT
Soil Temperature ( C)
10
o
Observed
5
Original
0
Modified
-5
-10
19/Aug/06 27/Nov/06 7/Mar/07 15/Jun/07 23/Sep/07 1/Jan/08 10/Apr/08 19/Jul/08 27/Oct/08
Date
Conclusions & Recommendations
Damping depth calculation modifications are
required for Boreal forest conditions
increasing the base depth constant improves the
damping depth representation
a function to modify the base depth constant with latitude
or annual average temperature is suggested
The damping depth definition should be modified
abandon the % of TAAir definition
adopt an absolute definition (eg. 2 oC range in temp.)
Improved damping depth representation provides
significant effect upon soil temp. calc deep in soil profife
little effect upon near surface temperatures
[Link]
Additional slides not used in presentation!
Photo credit: Tom Plouffe
Toby & Pierre pre-harvest
Watershed Harvest – Winter of 2003/2004
Examples of vegetation 3rd summer post harvest
Upper elevations
7 watersheds
198 sensors (702 tiny
wires) = steady
maintenance
Harvested, Conifer and Deciduous Sites
Site ID Landcover Species Cover (approx %)* Canopy Cover (%) Elevation (m)
H1 Harvested n/a 0 1016
H2 Harvested n/a 0 991
H3 Harvested n/a 0 1043
C1 Conifer PL(90) AW(10) 92 1028
C2 Conifer PL(90) AW(10) 97 1005
C3 Conifer PL(90) AW(10) 89 1054
D1 Deciduous AW(70) SB(20) PL(10) 84 1053
D2 Deciduous AW(60) SB(20) PL(20) 96 1026
D3 Deciduous AW(90) PL(10) 95 1013
* PL: lodgepole pine, AW: trembling aspen, SB: black spruce.
Largest Damping Depth and Average Soil Water Content
Harvest Site - H1 Harvest Site - H3
avg. air WC @ avg. air WC @
temp. dd 1m temp. dd 1m
o o
Year C m % C m %
2006 - - - - - -
2007 2.8 4.89 42% 3.8 5.32 55%
2008 3.2 4.87 43% 2.8 5.19 45%
2009 - - - 3.6 5.37 47%
avg. 3.0 4.88 43% 3.4 5.29 49%
range 0.4 0.02 1% 1.0 0.17 10%