Scribd
Upload
5 views2 pages

Kevin Fabery Group Participation Review

The document outlines a scoring guide for group members' attitudes, participation, group skills, and time management in a project, with scores ranging from poor to excellent. Each member's performance is evaluated, resulting in total scores that reflect their contributions, with comments highlighting specific issues faced by one member, Kevin. The document also includes instructions for submitting a reflection file based on the evaluations.

Uploaded by

cmclaughlin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views2 pages

Kevin Fabery Group Participation Review

The document outlines a scoring guide for group members' attitudes, participation, group skills, and time management in a project, with scores ranging from poor to excellent. Each member's performance is evaluated, resulting in total scores that reflect their contributions, with comments highlighting specific issues faced by one member, Kevin. The document also includes instructions for submitting a reflection file based on the evaluations.

Uploaded by

cmclaughlin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Elements Poor = 1 Average =2 Good =3 Excellent = 4 Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5

and scoring scores below scores below scores below scores below scores below
guide Name: Name: Ginger Name: Kara Name: Megan Name: Kevin
Mitchell Hawkins Nitschke Murray Fabery
“Reed” Payne
ATTITUDES
Attitude Rejects or Ignores other Accepts others’ Encourages 4 4 4 4 2
ridicules others’ opinions or opinions others’ opinions
opinions discourages their
expression
Participation Seems bored or Listens but does Occasionally Actively 4 4 3 3 1
disassociated not actively contributes, contributes to
from project – contribute ideas are related group goals.
not contributing and purposeful
within their
means
GROUP SKILLS
Meetings Did not attend Could be coaxed Worked to set Took initiative to 4 4 3 3 2
agreed upon to meet mutually set mutually-
meetings agreeable agreeable
meetings and meetings and
then attended attended
Equitable Did less than Did almost as Did equal share Did more than a 4 4 3 3 2
work others while much as others of work full share or took
equally qualified on helping other
to do so group members
Time Some or all work Work usually late Work done by Work done early 4 4 4 4 2
Management was not done but in enough agreed time
(without time to be
extenuating included
circumstances)
and had to be
completed by
others
Total score for each group member SCORE: 20 SCORE: 20 SCORE: 17 SCORE: 17 SCORE: 9

COMMENTS: We originally had 7 members but Alesha Woods dropped the class partway so her score was not added. Kevin seemed to try but didn’t
seem to understand a bulk of the assignment no matter the explanations, examples, sample papers, etc. provided/linked to him. Would not
communicate before writing up his parts which led to lots of corrections and rewriting. Often communicated/provided work as if he wasn’t reading the
group chat but said he was. Hard to get in touch with without pinging him directly. Nice guy but seemed busy and distracted.

MLIS 7200 Strategic Project – Group Participation Scoring -- YOUR NAME: Crystal McLaughlin
Please complete one sheet for all your group members. Place the group member’s name at the top of the relevant column. Name your completed file
“yourlastnamefirstinitial_reflection”. Mine would be named “SuddethJ_reflection.docx”.

You might also like