0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Communicative Language Teaching Strategies

The document outlines a structured approach to teaching language based on communicative principles, emphasizing realistic dialog formats and the natural use of language functions. It details stages of language presentation, highlighting functions in dialogs, controlled and semi-controlled practice, and communicative activities that focus on meaning and communication. Additionally, it includes suggestions for closure activities, homework, and evaluation methods to assess lesson objectives.

Uploaded by

Meenasai
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Communicative Language Teaching Strategies

The document outlines a structured approach to teaching language based on communicative principles, emphasizing realistic dialog formats and the natural use of language functions. It details stages of language presentation, highlighting functions in dialogs, controlled and semi-controlled practice, and communicative activities that focus on meaning and communication. Additionally, it includes suggestions for closure activities, homework, and evaluation methods to assess lesson objectives.

Uploaded by

Meenasai
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

TEACHING A LANGUAGE FUNCTION BASED ON COMMUNICATIVE PRINCIPLES

(1) LANGUAGE PRESENTATION: DIALOG FORMAT


-- interaction between speakers should be realistic
-- setting and role relationship between speakers should be indicated
-- target function should occur naturally and represent the one that native speakers would
use most frequently in that situation (unmarked form); the dialogS should not be an
artificial context for the function
-- provide more than one dialog to show how language varies depending on:
(a) the relationship between speakers (formality levels),
(b) the type of task (e.g. major/minor imposition, major/minor offense)
-- if possible, have native speakers perform the dialog and tape-record it (use as listening
activity before the students see the transcript)

(2) HIGHLIGHTING OF FUNCTION IN DIALOGS


-- exploit the dialogs and have the students discover instances of the target function
(linguistic exponents) and underline them
-- develop a grid that allows a visual display of language forms related to social parameters
of the situation
-- transfer the linguistic forms of the target function out of the dialog to see in isolation
(on the blackboard or OHP) and arrange them according to formality level, type of task in
the grid

(3) CONTROLLED PRACTICE: FOCUS ON ACCURATELY PRODUCING AND


SUPPLYING THE APPROPRIATE LINGUISTIC FORM FOR THE FUNCTION
-- provide exercises that limit students’ attention to the linguistic forms of the target
function so that they can be accurately produced (this implies that students appropriately
identify formality level and type of task!)
- these exercises should be meaningful and realistic (no isolated, unconnected practice
sentences): provide realistic unifying context; a lot of practice can center around dialog
activities
-- make sure that the exercise is not simply a mechanical transformation where students
could supply the correct linguistic form for the function without considering the meaning
of the whole exchange
-- provide for pair or group practice wherever possible
-- provide enough practice exchanges that the students can practice while you walk around
the classroom to "eavesdrop" on them (and provide help if needed)

Sample Activities for Controlled Practice:


a) recognition (ss identify role relationship of speakers and type of task)
b) identification (ss identify role relationship of speakers/type of task and produce
appropriate linguistic exponent)
c) information transfer (ss transfer linguistic exponents into appropriate cell in grid)
d) meaningful language drill (involving fixed patterns of role relationships and task types;
regulated sequence and form of responses, but response choices are meaningful)
(4) SEMI-CONTROLLED PRACTICE: MOVING AWAY FROM FOCUS ON LINGUISTIC
FORMS/ACCURACY TO FOCUS ON MEANING/COMMUNICATION
-- move toward less controlled exercises and provide stronger focus on meaning component
-- make sure that exercises model realistic tasks and realistic language use (i.e. are these
the type of exchanges that native speakers would engage in) and provide unifying content
-- if possible, provide for exchange of personal information

Sample Activities for Semi-Controlled Practice:


a) cued narrativelhalf dialog (ss produce appropriate linguistic exponents following
verbal/written/pictorial cues provided throughout the activity)
b) unscrambling tasks (ss assemble a communicative exchange by putting the relevant parts
of the exchange in order)
c) information exchange (short information gap tasks that help practice the target
function)
d) preparation (ss plan, prepare, rehearse for a later activity)

(5) COMMUNICATIVE ACTIVITY: FOCUS ON MEANING/COMMUNICATION AND


ACCOMPLISHING A COMMUNICATIVE GOAL
-- activity should allow for genuine information exchange
-- the new function should be an integral part of the speaking activity, but should not be the
focus, so that attention is shifted away from the function (and its linguistic exponents) to
a genuine exchange of messages among students
-- activity needs to be adequately prepared
-- explain the purpose of the activity (best at the end; otherwise students will focus on the
function too much)

Sample Activities for Speaking:


a) information gap tasks (longer, extended versions of semi-controlled info gaps; ss should
focus on social protocol of the entire situation, e.g. the hellos and good-byes in phone
conversations)
b) opinion gap tasks (ss engage in cooperatively solving a problem)
c) role-play l drama l simulation (ss freely act out roles and situations after initial cues,
often simulating real-life actions and experiences)
d) games (ss produce and use language in a setting of a language game)
e) interviews (ss obtain information from each other)
f) discussion (ss discuss specified topic; sides may or may not be assigned)

(6) CLOSURE ACTIVITY

(7) HOMEWORK:
Learning tasks that extend beyond the class hour

(8) EVALUATION
How can you determine whether or not your lesson objectives have been
accomplished?

Common questions

Powered by AI

The transition from controlled to semi-controlled practice involves shifting focus from linguistic accuracy to meaning and communication. Initially, exercises focus on accurately producing linguistic forms within a controlled setting. As students become familiar with these forms, practice moves toward semi-controlled exercises that emphasize realistic language use and communication. This transition is important because it prepares students to use language more freely and contextually, reflecting real-life communication, which enhances their ability to perform in authentic situations .

Communicative activities differ from controlled practice methods by emphasizing the accomplishment of a communicative goal and the genuine exchange of messages. Unlike controlled practice, where the focus is on accurately producing linguistic forms, communicative activities integrate the new function into meaningful interaction without making it the main focus. This shift in focus allows students to apply linguistic forms naturally and improves their ability to achieve lesson objectives related to real-world communication, social protocols, and functional language use .

In teaching language functions using a dialog format, essential components include: realistic interaction between speakers, clarity of setting and role relationship, natural occurrence of the target function representative of frequent native speaker use, and avoiding artificial contexts. Teachers should provide multiple dialogs to demonstrate how language changes based on formality, task type, and social parameters. Native speakers performing these dialogs can be recorded to enhance listening activities .

Pair or group practice enhances learning of language functions by providing opportunities for students to engage in interactive and cooperative language use. It allows them to practice linguistic forms within a social context, improving their ability to use these forms naturally and accurately. Such practice not only reinforces learning through repetition and feedback but also mirrors authentic communication scenarios, preparing students for real-life interactions .

The role relationship between speakers influences the formality level of language used in communicative language teaching. Teachers are encouraged to show how language varies depending on this relationship by providing more than one dialog example. These examples illustrate differences in language use according to formality levels and the nature of the task, such as the imposition or offense level. Without considering these relationships, language practice might not be realistic or reflective of native speaker communication patterns .

Closure activities in communicative language classrooms provide a conclusion to the lesson by reviewing and reinforcing key concepts. They often involve summarizing what has been learned, reflecting on the application of new language functions, or engaging in activities that consolidate and contextualize the day's learning objectives. These activities help solidify students' understanding and ensure that they can connect the lesson content to broader language use contexts outside the classroom .

Providing a meaningful and realistic context in controlled practice exercises is significant because it ensures that language practice is not just mechanical but reflects authentic language use. When exercises simulate realistic interactions, they help students internalize the language functions in a way that is applicable to real-life situations. This approach avoids isolated, disconnected practice and enhances the students' ability to transfer learned skills to real-world communication .

The grid tool assists in highlighting language functions by visually displaying language forms related to social parameters of a situation. By transferring linguistic forms from dialogs into isolation and arranging them according to formality level and task type in the grid, students can easily see the variations and appropriate applications. This aids in better understanding and retention of language use in context, fostering an analytical approach to language learning .

Assessment of lesson objectives in communicative language teaching involves evaluating whether students can successfully accomplish communicative goals and use language for genuine exchanges. This includes observing students' participation in activities such as role-plays, information gap tasks, and discussions to determine their ability to apply language functions in realistic contexts. Additionally, teachers may use closure activities and homework to extend learning beyond the classroom and confirm if students have internalized the linguistic goals of the lesson .

Recording native speakers performing dialogs is important because it provides students with authentic language input, demonstrating how linguistic forms are used naturally in context. Listening to native speakers helps students attune to pronunciation, intonation, and fluent delivery, enhancing their listening comprehension skills. It also ensures that the language models presented align with realistic use, supporting students in developing more accurate and culturally-appropriate language skills .

You might also like