Design

for the
Environment
A Competitive Edge
for the Future
Toolkit
Design for
Environment
Toolkit
(Df E)
Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance

Minnesota Technical Assistance Program (MnTAP)

Table of Contents
v About the Authors...2

v Acknowledgments...3

v Preface...4

v Part One: Introduction to Design for the Environment (DfE)...6

What is DfE?...6
Why DfE?...10
Success in DfE...12
Implementing DfE...13

v Part Two: DfE Matrices and Questions...17

Explanation of the DfE Matrix System..17
Figure: Product DfE Matrix...18
Instructions For Using the DfE Matrix...19
Interpretation of Results...28
Matrix Questions...20
Definitions...30

v Part Three: Reference Information...32

Index of Hazardous Chemical Pollutants (alphabetical listing)...32
Plastics Environmental Risk Information...57
Figure: Recycling Rates and Commodity Price Information....58
Index of Climate Altering Chemicals...59
Polymers....61
Degradable Polymers - Vendor List...62
Part/Materials Suppliers Environmental Survey...65
Additional Resources...66
Works Cited....68
Summary of References...69

Other Vendor Lists

Checklist of Printed Resources for Minnesota Businesses
Outlets for Industrial Scrap Pallets
Alternative Solvent Degreasers
Manufacturers of Aqueous Cleaning Equipment
Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Cleaners for Metal Part Degreasing
Safer Stripping and Cleaning Chemicals for Coatings and
Polymers

Page 1
About the Authors
Jeremy M. Yarwood - Research Specialist, Minnesota Technical Assistance
Program (MnTAP)

Mr. Yarwood has previously worked with MnTAP advising Minnesota companies
in developing environmentally responsible processes. He received his B.S. Civil
(Environmental) Engineering summa cum laude from the University of Minnesota.
Mr. Yarwood is currently a graduate fellow in the Department of Civil Engineering at
the University of Minnesota and plans to obtain a M.S. and Ph.D. in the field of
Environmental Engineering.

Patrick D. Eagan, Ph.D., P.E. - Program Director, Department of Engineering

Professional Development, University of Wisconsin - Madison

Dr. Eagan has over 20 years of industrial experience as a design engineer, plant
project manager, business development manager, educator and researcher. He has
worked with numerous companies to implement Design for Environment programs,
including Boeing Defense and Space Group, Eastman Kodak, AMP and Motorola.
Dr. Eagan travels extensively, speaking on DfE topics at the Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) International Symposium on Electronics and the
Environment, the Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Roundtable, and many other
conferences. In addition, Dr. Eagan directs multidisciplinary projects and conducts
public and private seminars on Design for Environment at the University of
Wisconsin, Madison. In addition to authoring several papers in his field, he has
served on panels and committees for the Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Technology Assessment, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and
the Great Lakes/Mid-Atlantic Hazardous Substance Research Center. Dr. Eagan
completed his Ph.D. in the Land Resources Program at the University of Wisconsin,
Madison. He has a M.S.E. in Engineering from the University of Washington, a
M.S. in Water Resources Management from the University of Wisconsin, Madison
and a B.A. in Biology from Lawrence University.

This guide book was printed on 20% post-consumer recycled-content,

process-chlorine-free paper with 100% recycled black ink by a Minnesota
Great Printer. The notebook paperboard cover has 100% recycled content. At
the end of use, the notebook may be disassembled to reuse or recycle the
metal and paperboard.

Page 2
 Acknowledgments
Although there have been contributions from numerous people and
organizations, there are a few who merit special recognition. Thanks to:

Ken Brown Design for the Environment Team Leader of the Business Environmental Resource
Center of the Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance (MOEA).

David Cera Supervisor of the Business Environmental Resource Center of the MOEA.

Fran Kurk Senior pollution prevention specialist at the MOEA, under whose direction the
DfE Toolkit was developed.

Bob Meier Policy analyst at the MOEA, whose advocacy and support made this project
possible.

Victoria Reinhardt Coordinator of the Product Stewardship Team of the MOEA.

Others who contributed to the development of this toolkit:

Tricia Conroy, MOEA

Randy Cook, MnTAP
Tony Hainault, MOEA
Mick Jost, MnTAP
Emily Moore, MOEA
Sally Patrick, MPCA
John Polanski, MnTAP

For review of the toolkit from an industry perspective special thanks to:

Steve Pedersen, United Defense

John Mahanna, Deb Horn, Greg Bone, IBM Corporation

Editing/Layout
Lisa Mlinarcik, MnTAP
Deb McKinley, MnTAP
Laurie Gustafson, OEA
Scott Andre, OEA

nes ot
in
Mn
a
M

Environmental
O f
Assistance TAP
ff ic e o
Minnesota Technical
Assistance Program

Page 3
 Preface
Included in this toolkit are:

• An introduction to Design for Environment (DfE)

• A product scoring tool for evaluating product designs in relation to
environmental impacts
• Reference materials

Product design is a critical determinant of a manufacturer’s

This Design for the competitiveness. The National Research Council estimates that 70
Environment (DfE) toolkit is percent or more of the costs of product development, manufacture and
a mechanism that allows use are determined during the initial design stages. This Design for the
companies to benefit by Environment (DfE) toolkit gives companies the tools needed to
incorporating incorporate environmental attributes early into product design.
environmental attributes Incorporating environmental attributes can result in reduced materials use
early into product design. and waste, improved designs, reduced future liabilities and other
efficiencies.

Use of DfE also demonstrates environmental responsibility to customers

and thus can bring improved market position in the global marketplace.
Product design is a unique point of leverage from which to influence
environmental impact. This is the stage when decisions are made about the
The advantages types of resources and manufacturing processes that will be used. These
are numerous. decisions ultimately determine the waste streams. Once a product is
designed, its environmental attributes are largely fixed. The result of
incorporating DfE into design can be high-quality, environmentally sound
products that enjoy a competitive advantage.

In summary, the benefits of implementing a Design for the Environment

program are numerous.

• Reduced cycle times

• Reduced costs
• Improved products
• Reduced regulatory concerns
• Reduced future liability
• Improved market position
• Improved environmental performance

A growing number of companies, including AT& T, Phillips, Motorola,

This toolkit is designed to AMP, Boeing Defense and Space, Xerox, Sony and Patagonia, use DfE
allow integration of DfE into procedures to bring an environmental perspective to their design
existing design practices. processes.

This toolkit is designed to allow integration of DfE into existing design

practices where many design aspects such as customer appeal, safety,
cost and other product attributes are considered. Design engineers can
meet as a group to use the toolkit. It is practical to use and does not

Page 4
 require a large time commitment. The toolkit will help designers develop a
numerical score for a product that shows them where the product is strong
and where it needs improvement with regards to environmental concerns.

In addition to the DfE tool, this kit includes reference data and information.
The reference data provides additional information for answering questions
when using the toolkit. This reference data section is also designed to be
expanded as additional sources of information become available. Users are
encouraged to seek out additional sources of information to add to this
reference section. The toolkit is a working model that can be adapted and
modified by product design teams.
The toolkit is a working
This toolkit can be used by design teams to:
model that can be
adapted and modified by • Evaluate environmental attributes of potential product designs
product design teams. • Evaluate environmental attributes of existing product designs
• Provide a score that can facilitate internal communication
• Evaluate potential design changes
• Develop a tailored tool for their own use
• Compare two products

In addition, this material can be used by engineering students to study DfE

principles and implementation.

The DfE tool described in this publication was originally developed by Dr.
T. E. Graedel and Dr. B. R. Allenby for AT&T, where it has been used
quite effectively. Others have modified the matrix system and found it to
be useful as well.

Page 5
 What is Design for the
Environment?
Design for Environment (DfE) is a systematic way of incorporating
environmental attributes into the design of a product. There are three
A systematic way unique characteristics of DfE:
to incorporate
environmental attributes • The entire life-cycle of a product is considered.
into product design. • Point of application is early in the product realization process.
• Decisions are made using a set of values consistent with
industrial ecology, integrative systems thinking or another
framework.

DfE considers the potential DfE considers the potential environmental impacts of a product throughout
its life-cycle. A product’s potential environmental impacts range from the
environmental impacts of
release of toxic chemicals into the environment to consumption of
a product throughout nonrenewable resources and excessive energy use. Life stages of a
its life-cycle. product include the time from the extraction of resources needed to make
the product to its disposal. In effect, designers design a product life-cycle
not just the product. An awareness of a product’s life- cycle will help the
company avoid environmental surprises and liabilities. Ideally, the design
team will seek to reduce these environmental impacts to the lowest level
possible.

A general product life-cycle is illustrated in figure 1, page 7. The earlier

in the product design life-cycle that a design team considers environmental
factors, the greater the potential for environmental benefit and cost
reduction. For the purposes of this toolkit, the life-cycle of a product has
been condensed into the five stages shown in figure 2, page 8. The life
stages in this abridged life-cycle are incorporated into the matrix system
presented in this toolkit.

These five stages are:

• Premanufacture − During this stage, parts and raw materials are

procured for use in manufacturing products.
• Manufacture − All stages of production within the company, from the
time the raw materials enter the facility until the product is ready for
packaging. Includes chemical or thermal processing, assembly and
finishing.
• Packaging and Distribution − The material is packaged for both
transport and purchase, routed through the appropriate distribution and
transport system, and delivered to the consumer.
• Use and Maintenance − The time from when the customer receives
the product until the customer is ready to dispose of the product. This
includes maintenance, as well as the time after partial replacements or
overhauls − as long as the consumer is in possession of the product.
• End of Life − The product is recycled, remanufactured or removed
from the life-cycle entirely by landfilling or incineration.

Page 6
 Figure 1
1. The General Product Life Cycle

Raw Materials Extraction

Transportation

Bulk Processing

Transportation

Engineered and
Specialty Materials
W
Transportation
a
The Earth
(air, soil, water
s Product Manufacturing
and Biosphere) t
e Transportation
s
Recycle
Packaging for Shipping

Transportation Reuse

Use and Service

Transportation

Material
Treatment Disposal processed for
reuse in another
product system

Page 7
 Figure 2. The Abridged Product Life-Cycle

Disposal
Premanufacture
(Parts, Raw
Materials)
Recycle

Product
Manufacture
End of Life Remanufacture

Reuse Distribution,
Product Use, Packaging
Maintenance

The life-cycle stages shown in the general product life-cycle (figure 1,

page 7) can be combined under different headings than the five listed
above if these headings do not adequately reflect a product’s life-cycle.

Focusing only on complying with environmental regulation compliance can

be costly. Hazardous waste management generates unnecessary costs if it
can be shown that the hazardous materials creating the wastes could be
eliminated from the manufacturing process. DfE takes a proactive
DfE takes a proactive approach to environmental considerations. Asking pertinent questions
approach to during the design phase regarding the potential environmental impact of a
environmental proposed product often reveals environmental liabilities that need to be
considerations. addressed. For instance, if a product contains lead or mercury, can the use
of these heavy metals be eliminated? If not, has the product been designed
so that the material will be accessible or recoverable at the end of the
product’s life? If solvents are used in the manufacture of the product, are
proper recovery/disposal mechanisms in place? Could the company
become liable for future disposal problems with the material?

“Design for Environment aims to bridge the gap between two

traditionally separate functions: product development and
environmental management. The goal of DfE is to bring these two
functions into closer contact and address product life-cycle issues
that are often ignored.”
-Implementing Design for Environment:
A Primer

Page 8
 Design for Environment does not imply that a product is designed solely
for the environment or that the environment is the only consideration. DfE
DfE is intended to become is intended to become an integral part of the product development process
an integral part of the along with other design considerations, such as product economics,
development process customer requirements, manufacturability and required product functions
(figure 3). These parameters could be considered as part of a general
design function “Design for X” (DfX), where X represents relevant design
issues such as those just mentioned.

Figure 3. Product Design Considerations

Customer
Requirements

Manufacturability Environmental
Concerns

Product Design

Product Economics Weight and Size

Function

DfE does not guarantee regulatory compliance, or address every

environmental issue. However, the incorporation of DfE into the design
program will help to minimize future environmental liabilities, improve the
environmental performance of a company and its products, and prepare
The incorporation of DfE
the manufacturer to meet existing and future government regulation.
into the design program
will help to minimize future
environmental liabilities.

Page 9
 Why Design for the
Environment?
Global initiatives are requiring greater product responsibility from
producers. In Europe, new regulations have been enacted that require
producers to take more responsibility for their products by providing for
the disposal or recycling of products at the end of their useful life.
Labeling products with environmental performance data can help to
differentiate products as well.

Companies are experiencing Companies are now expected by regulators, consumers, environmental
increasing pressure and advocate groups, and industry associations to develop environmentally
expectations to develop conscious products and processes. DfE provides a method for meeting
these demands. Potential benefits to the manufacturer include:
environmentally conscious
products and processes from
• Improved designs
a variety of sources. • Reduced costs and time-to-market
• Improved market position
• Reduced regulatory concerns
• Reduced future liability
• Improved environmental performance

Improved designs
Design for Environment emphasizes one more design attribute in addition
to those already being considered (e.g. cost, size). It allows the
manufacturer to improve the performance of their product and position
themselves in an evolving world of environmental regulations and
consumer demand.

Incorporating Design for Environment concepts may also improve product

characteristics as related to other design parameters. For instance, Xerox
has redesigned several of its copier subassemblies so that they contain
fewer different materials and are easy to remove from the copier itself.
Companies may be able As a result, Xerox is able to refurbish many of these subassemblies and
to extend market share or reuse them. This has resulted in a reduction of solid waste as well as
reach new markets by significant cost savings for Xerox.
adding “green” attributes
to their products. Reduced costs and time-to-market
By designing out hazardous materials, the manufacturer can reduce time-
to-market by avoiding the time and resources required to obtain necessary
permits. At the same time, the company can realize cost savings by
eliminating or replacing materials that have high disposal costs. One
example is substituting stainless steel sleeves for chromium plated coatings
on a cam shaft.

Page 10
 Improved market position
Companies may be able to extend market share or reach new markets by
adding “green” attributes to their products. As state and federal agencies
develop purchasing guidelines for the procurement of environmentally
preferable products, for instance, manufacturers with established DfE
Fuel-efficient furnaces, for programs will be able to offer a competitive product. By consistently
instance, are beneficial to developing environmentally conscious methods and products, the company
the environment and establishes a reputation of environmental responsibility. It is possible for
represent a marketable environmental quality, like other product characteristics, to become a
cost-savings to the distinguishing feature of a product. The company can employ marketing
consumer at the same time. strategies to make the most of its environmental performance as perceived
by consumers. Fuel-efficient furnaces, for instance, are beneficial to the
environment and represent a marketable cost-savings to the consumer at
the same time.

Reduced regulatory concerns

Design for Environment enables a company to anticipate and address
Reducing pollution and future trends in environmental compliance and regulation. By taking a
waste through DfE can proactive approach to environmental responsibility, manufacturers may be
enable a company to able to position themselves ahead of those companies with reactive
produce the same strategies. In other words, companies may incorporate future
products for less cost. environmental demands and regulations into their current product and
process design procedures, rather than be faced with the costly burden of
reworking designs once new legislation or consumer demands are in place.

Implementing a DfE program can help a manufacturer identify sources of

An informed decision pollution and waste. These are costly, because the materials generated
during the design stage must be treated and be disposed of and because these are unused
can avoid costly materials. Reducing pollution and waste through DfE can enable a
environmental liabilities. company to produce the same products for less cost. Eliminating the use of
toxic materials in the manufacturing process can save a company
significant amounts of time and money. This includes the elimination of
compliance activities that require extensive paperwork and follow-up, such
as Toxic Release Inventories (TRI) or Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) regulations.

Reduced future liability

Resolving potential environmental hazards before they occur can represent
significant savings to the company. An informed decision during the design
stage can avoid costly environmental liabilities. By eliminating toxic
materials from products or designing products that are easily recyclable,
Superior environmental
companies may avoid significant costs required to dispose of the product.
performance can only In addition, reducing toxic releases during processing helps eliminate
benefit the world potential costs of treating contaminated water or soil.
community as a whole.
Improved environmental performance
Design for Environment can not only improve a company’s economic and
regulatory standing, but goes well beyond the boundaries of the company.
Design for Environment addresses both local concerns, such as toxic pollutant
discharge, and major international ones, such as ozone depletion, global
warming and human health concerns. Industrial activity continues to have a
tremendous impact on the environment. Superior environmental performance
can benefit the world community as a whole as each manufacturer contributes
through integrating environmental concerns into the design process.

Page 11
 Success in DfE
Listed below are just some of many examples of successful DfE
implementation by a variety of manufacturers.

XEROX has found that DfE- related activities have produced savings of
several hundred million dollars, while reducing the amount of material sent
XEROX
to the landfill. Their newest digital copier has components arranged in
subassemblies so they can be easily removed. The fuser roll that was
previously disposable is now made of a combination of aluminum and steel
that can be re-coated again and again. These activities have enabled
Xerox to reuse, recycle and remanufacture machines at the end of their
product life.

BMW and BMW and Volkswagen are both using DfE to study the disassembly and
Volkswagen recycling of recovered materials in automobiles. BMW has a goal of
eventually making automobiles out of 100% reusable/recyclable parts.

Hewlett Packard’s 850 series of inkjet printers were designed under a

DfE framework. The outer casings include post-consumer plastic from
recycled telephones. The modular architecture and use of few permanent
screws makes the printers easy to disassemble for repair or recycling.
Any plastic parts larger than three grams are identified and marked by
Hewlett Packard type. Components of the printer are molded using a thin-walled process so
less material is needed. These printers also use 80% less power than dot
matrix printers. Power down and sleep modes means 50% less energy is
used by this series of printers than comparable inkjet printers.

Sun Microsystems, Inc., an electronics manufacturer, has included a

variety of disassembly features and post-consumer plastics in their
Sun Microsystems, Inc. products since implementing a DfE program. Heavy metals have also been
eliminated from plastics, packaging, inks and manuals used in Sun
Products.

IBM has incorporated numerous design for the environment (DfE)

features in the AS/400 Advanced Series computer product line including
on/off power programming, powder coatings, coding of plastic parts and a
new method for attaching acoustic foam that facilitates removal for
IBM Corporation recycling. IBM also uses recycled plastic in many product lines. Plastic
parts are kept free of contamination from labels and paint so that they are
recyclable. The IBM 3900 Advanced Function Printing System is
upgradable so that the entire system does not have to be replaced for
improved performance.

General Motors is working with the University of Tennessee to develop a

General Motors Corp. software program that tracks the energy and environmental impact of
Saturn Division every part of a car during the car’s life-cycle. The software will also
determine design changes that will make certain parts easier to recycle or
reuse. Saturn designers will be able to look at the environmental
component of their design decisions.

Page 12
 Implementing DfE
Implementation and integration of DfE will vary from company to
company. The implementation process is affected by a number of steps.
Necessary steps to implementing DfE include investigation, promotion,
reporting and rewarding, and feedback.

Investigation
A manufacturer should examine the context in which to implement the DfE
A manufacturer should program. The company should seek to establish relevant and achievable
examine the context in environmental goals within the design process, that will establish the
which to implement the company and its products as environmentally responsible. The design
Design for Environment process should be considered, as well as the most appropriate point at
program. which to use the toolkit. The company should consider the position it hopes
to hold in the local, national or international markets, particularly in regard
to relevant industry standards. Can the company anticipate pending
environmental legislation or requirements? Will meeting the standards of
systems such as ISO 14000 help to establish the company in new markets?
Can the DfE program be developed to a point that satisfies the “eco-
management” standards of ISO 14000? Has the company signed on to any
environmental commitments or organizations such as the International
Establishing specific goals Chamber of Commerce, the 16 Principles of Sustainability.
for the company and
Establishing specific goals for the company and outlining methods for
outlining methods for achieving them enables a manufacturer to assign responsibilities to
achieving them enables a departments and individuals. The more specific the goal and methodology,
manufacturer to assign the easier it will be to measure progress in achieving the company’s
specific responsibilities to objectives. The ability to measure progress toward objectives is essential in
departments and sustaining DfE. As long as affected departments are able to see progress
individuals. in implementing DfE, the momentum of the implementation continues to
increase.

Promotion
Communicating the company’s goals and strategies for DfE is critical to
the success of the program. Of particular importance are upper level
management, the design team and production managers. Even a raised
awareness among the production employees can significantly affect the
environmental performance of a company. It is important that
commitments to DfE be made by top management officials and members
It is important that throughout the company before implementing the design and production
commitments to DfE be procedures. This commitment is essential to the continued success of
made by top environmental initiatives.
management officials and
members throughout the This communication can initially take place through a seminar, a series of
company before workshops or other method as appropriate to the company. These
implementing the design education methods have been successful at places such as the Boeing
and production Defense and Space Group, Motorola and AMP. At this time, specific
procedures. environmental challenges faced by the company and methods for meeting
those challenges would be presented. Roles would be established for
departments and individuals.

Page 13
 Report and Reward
In order to measure the progress of a DfE program, the manufacturer
should establish specific measures. For instance, if the goal for a company
is 100% toxin-free products, it would be advantageous to track the
reduction (perhaps by weight) of toxic materials in the product(s).

Incentives and disincentives can be used to manage implementation of

DfE. Incorporating specific measures into the program allows the
company to establish viable incentive and reward programs. Beneficial
product and process changes, in fact, are often proposed by workers on
the factory floor who have an intimate knowledge of specific product
characteristics or manufacturing procedures. If a company is serious about
If a company is serious DfE, it should include methods to monitor application of DfE concepts,
about DfE, it should include track results and reward improvements to product design.
methods to monitor
Feedback
application of DfE
Communication is important. Regularly scheduled meetings, updates and
concepts, track results, and reports establish the momentum of DfE in a company, and ensure that no
reward improvements to one is left “out of the loop.”
product design.
At the same time, production managers should be kept up to date so that
design changes do not catch them unaware. Other manufacturing
personnel need to be included, as well, to ensure the quality of decisions in
the design process. Designers should seek the input of quality managers,
suppliers, purchasers, environmental managers and customers.
Establishing this feedback system will greatly improve DfE analyses and
decisions. As involved parties realize the impact of their input on the
process, support will grow for the DfE program throughout the company
Regularly scheduled and among its customers.
meetings, updates, reports,
etc. establish the As part of this process, the company should determine whether it is on
momentum of DfE in a target to reach specified time objectives. If not, additional resources or
alternative procedures may be required. On the other hand, if progress is
company, and ensure that
being made, the company should identify those procedures that are
no one is left “out of the beneficial to the environmental program.
loop.”
DfE can be implemented in several ways. These include:

• Incremental product change

• Process improvement
• New product concepts

Incremental product change

Small, incremental product changes can reduce the environmental impact
of current products. Rather than designing a completely new product, the
design team examines individual product characteristics and improves them
with each model release. This type of approach is the most common and
usually represents the easiest changes to implement. Making a home
furnace more fuel-efficient is an example of this methodology.

Page 14
 Process improvement
Modifying entire processes may reduce the environmental impact of
many products. Although this approach may present a few more
technical challenges than for incremental product changes, there are
often process characteristics that are still relatively simple to
implement. Minimizing volatile emissions on a painting line, for
instance, would improve the environmental performance of all products
associated with the production line.

New product concepts

DfE can lead to radical changes in existing products or processes as
well as entirely new technologies. This approach requires “out of the
box thinking” but can offer beneficial business opportunities to
manufacturers. For instance, recent developments in the printing
industry allow printers to use electronic imaging in their pre-press
departments, thereby reducing chemical wastes from photodeveloping
and platemaking.

Implementing DfE can also lead to changes in one or a number of

individual product features. Below is a partial list of examples of new
product design features that can be introduced to improve the
Implementing DfE can environmental attributes of products:
lead to changes in one
or a number of • Using alternative joining technologies such as snaps, darts
individual product and screws instead of adhesives.
features • Minimizing or eliminating embedded metal threads in plastics.
• Using screws of similar head technology.
• Minimizing the variety of materials used (including fillers,
colors and additives).
• Marking plastics clearly with resin type identifiers.
• Using components made of known materials.
• Avoiding painting and putting labels on recyclable parts.
• Using modular architecture, so that modules can be
replaced to upgrade or repair equipment.
• Using ceramics instead of plastics with flame retardants.
• Leasing of products for “take-back” and reuse.
• Using “power down or sleep modes” for electronic devices to
cut energy use during inactivity.

Implementing DfE: An Example

XYZ Co., after analyzing a product design using the DfE Toolkit, sets a
goal of eliminating all toxic materials from a product in three years. As
part of this objective, the company realizes benefits in decreased
regulatory concerns and potential liabilities. XYZ Co. allocates the
challenge of finding acceptable substitutes for the toxic materials to its
research and development department. R&D in turn consults the
production managers to establish required material characteristics for
quality production. The department assembles a list of toxic materials
contained in the product, as well as possible alternatives. Monthly

Page 15
 Figure 4. An Overview of Product Design and Design Inputs

Design Input Company Environmental Goals,

Desired Environmental Attributes DfE Tookit

Determination of Prototype
Design Stage Product Functions
Conceptual
Assembly and
Detailed Final
Design Design
and Goals Testing

Redesign

updates from the department establish the progress being made toward
finding substitutes for the toxic materials. As the team proposes design
changes, it consults production managers and other interested parties to
determine the feasibility of the changes. As the research team finds
substitutes, the toxic materials are crossed off the list. XYZ Co. holds
regular meetings to determine whether the progress is on target to meet
the time objective of three years.

In the case of XYZ Co., within the first year substitutions have been found
for almost half the toxic materials. The company recognizes that most of
these substitutions have come through contact with other manufacturers.
As a result, XYZ Co. focuses the majority of resources on inter-company
communication, further enhancing the DfE implementation.

Every company uses a unique approach to product realization. It is useful

The tool included in this to generalize this design process and see how DfE can be applied (figure
publication is intended 4). Design teams will generally need to know materials and manufacturing
to be used in the processes required by a particular product design. A review of the matrix
conceptual phase of during earlier stages may put a product in an environmental context and
the product realization help with design specifications as well.
process...
Different approaches and tools are appropriate for different phases of the
design process. During early design phases, company goals or principles
and desired environmental attributes can be useful in developing a set of
product specifications. Early specifications can include material selection
restrictions, recyclability, durability or other functional requirements. The
tool included in this publication is intended to be used in the
conceptual phase of the product realization process, once the design
team has selected materials for a prototype and outlined initial
manufacturing processes. Although the tool is geared toward product
design, it can also be easily used to evaluate of existing products.

Page 16
 Explanation of
Product DfE Matrix
To determine the environmental impact of a product, pertinent questions
must be asked about the effects of the product design throughout the
To determine the product’s life. In the following section, there are 100 questions that address
environmental impact of a a wide range of design and environmental topics.
product, pertinent
questions must be asked to The questions are designed to encourage consideration by the design team
consider the effects of the of potential environmental impacts caused by the manufacture, use and
product design throughout disposal of the product. In addition, the matrix highlights areas of
the product’s life. environmental concern and provides manufacturers with ideas and options
for resolving those concerns.

The questions have been written in a manner general enough to apply to

numerous types of products. Question syntax is sometimes unavoidably
vague. Space has been provided, however, for users to note specific
product attributes. There will likely be other environmental parameters
considered in the product design, and the design team should feel free to
adapt or modify the questions to their own use.

Who should use the toolkit?

This DfE Toolkit is intended for use by the product design team. Those that
This DfE Toolkit is intended are responsible for the design of the product will be the ones who are best
for use by the product able to quickly answer the matrix questions and address possible design
design team. changes. Other concerned parties, such as production managers,
management and sales staff may be an important part of the evaluation
process as well. Team members may need at least half a day to go through
the product analysis together, particularly if more than one product design
alternative is being considered. Another alternative is to hold four one- hour
meetings one week apart to evaluate a product. The premanufacturing
survey can be done before or during the evaluation process.

Although several resources are provided in this toolkit, it may not be

possible to answer every question in the initial design analysis. This is
particularly true of the sections on resource extraction. Some questions
may require further research by team members to complete the product
analysis. Even if the design team is unable to answer all of the questions,
the matrix will be helpful in evaluating the product.

The intent of this toolkit is to raise questions regarding a product’s

environmental impacts that may not have been previously considered and
to provide a semi-quantitative analysis of alternative product designs. As
individual manufacturers adapt the toolkit to their needs, the actual scores
will be relevant only to the company itself.

Page 17
 Product Design Matrix: Design for Environment Toolkit
Environmental Concern
1 2 Energy 3 Solid 4 Liquid 5 Gaseous
LIFE STAGE Materials Use Residue Residue Residue Total
A (A.1) (A.2) (A.3) (A.4) (A.5)

Premanufacture

B (B.1) (B.2) (B.3) (B.4) (B.5)

Product
manufacture
C (C.1) (C.2) (C.3) (C.4) (C.5)

Distribution,
Page 18

packaging
D (D.1) (D.2) (D.3) (D.4) (D.5)

Product use,
maintenance
E (E.1) (E.2) (E.3) (E.4) (E.5)

End of life

Total

Adapted from Industrial Ecology. T.E. Graedel and B.R. Allenby. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995. Used by permission of the authors.

Matrix locations are indicated by the numbers in the upper left hand corner of each box.
Maximum Total Score without Matrix Element A = 100 points
Maximum Total Score including Matrix Element A = 125 points
Instructions for Using
the DfE Matrix
The Product Design for the Environment (DfE) Matrix, upon which this toolkit
is based, is found on page 18. Use the questions found on pages 20 - 27 , to
score product designs using this matrix system. Design team members should
save the printed materials provided as original copies and make duplicates as
needed for product evaluations. Additional aids such as a manufacturing flow
diagram and materials specification information can be useful for answering
the matrix questions.

Using the DfE Matrix

1) Information from a survey of your parts and raw materials suppliers is used
to answer the A.1 - A.5 matrix element questions. If you do not wish to
survey your suppliers, or want to do it at a later time, begin with the
questions for matrix element B.1.

2) Answer each matrix question on pages 21-27 “yes” or “no.” If the answer
is “yes”, circle the number of points in the “yes” column for that question.
If the answer is “no”, circle the zero for that question. If the question does
not apply to your product or your product has no impact in this area, answer
“yes.” For example, question B.4 asks, “If hazardous solvents or oils are
used, have alternatives been thoroughly investigated?” If your process does
not use solvents or oils at all, then the product design has no potential
impact in this area, and your answer would be “yes.” The questions have
been written so that “yes” indicates a positive or no environmental impact,
whereas “no” indicates a negative environmental impact.

3) For each matrix element, determine a score from 0 - 5 by adding the

number of circled “yes” answers. Enter this number in the corresponding
box on the matrix. For example, if you answered “yes” to the first two
questions in Matrix Element B.2 (product manufacture, energy use) “4” is
placed in row 2, column 2. Note that each matrix element or box is mapped to
its corresponding questions by a number in the upper left hand corner.

4) Add the scores in each column and write the total in the corresponding cell
in the “Total” row. Add the scores in each row and write the total in the
corresponding cell in the “Total” column.

5) Add the numbers in the “Total” column and again in the “Total” row. The
sums should be the same. Enter this sum into the remaining box on the
bottom right-hand corner of the matrix. The result is a relative score for the
product that can be used to compare a product currently being designed
with an existing product, or to compare alternative designs for a new
product. The totals for each of the life stages (rows) and the environmental
impacts (columns) indicate areas of strength and areas for improvement in
terms of the environmental attributes of a product over its entire life-cycle.
The scores are relative, comparative scores that are strictly for internal
company use. The maximum total score without matrix element A (supplier
survey question information) is 100 points. With matrix element A the
maximum score is 125 points.

Words in bold in the matrix questions are defined on pages 30 - 31. If the
question is followed by a “see . . . ,” see this reference for further data,
information or explanation related to the question.

Page 19
Matrix Questions
Information obtained from a survey of your parts and raw materials supplier (refer to page 65 of the
reference section) is used to answer the questions for Matrix Element A. If you do not wish to survey
your suppliers go to Matrix Element B.

Premanufacture
As indicated by the survey of your suppliers:
A.1: Premanufacture, Materials
What percent of your company’s suppliers for this product or component have an Environmental
Management System (EMS) in place? (circle one)

0% or unknown = 0 points
1 to 5 % = 2 points
6 to 25% = 3 points
26 to 50% = 4 points
>50% = 5 points

A.2: Premanufacture, Energy

What percent of your company’s suppliers for this product or component have formal energy conservation
practices in place, such as the Environmental Protection Agency’s Green Lights Program? (circle one)

0% or unknown = 0 points
1 to 5 % = 2 points
6 to 25% = 3 points
26 to 50% = 4 points
>50% = 5 points

A.3: Premanufacture, Solid Residue

What percent of your company’s suppliers for this product or component have ISO 9000 or ISO 14000
in place or regularly publish a company environmental report? (circle one)

0% or unknown = 0 points
1 to 5 % = 2 points
6 to 25% = 3 points
26 to 50% = 4 points
>50% = 5 points

A.3: Premanufacture, Liquid

What percent of your company’s suppliers for this product or component have a water conservation
program ? (circle one)
0% or unknown = 0 points
1 to 5 % = 2 points
6 to 25% = 3 points
26 to 50% = 4 points
>50% = 5 points

Page 20
A.5: Premanufacture, Gaseous
What percent of your company’s suppliers for this product or component have a formal program in
place for minimizing air emissions? (circle one)

0% or unknown = 0 points
1 to 5 % = 2 points
6 to 25% = 3 points
26 to 50% = 4 points
>50% = 5 points

Enter the point value of each of the circled answers into the corresponding “ matrix element A boxes”
of toolkit matrix sheet for this product or component.

Product Manufacture
B.1: Product Manufacture, Materials Choice
(for each question circle one number)
For this product or component: Yes No

1) Is as much recycled material used in your product as possible? 1 0

2) Is the use of hazardous materials avoided or minimized?

(see figure 5 page 58, Hazardous Chemical Index, page 32) 2 0

3) Are the amounts of materials that are used minimized? 1 0

4) Are the number of types of materials that are used minimized? 1 0

Total Points for Matrix Element B.1

B.2: Product Manufacture, Energy Use

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Do the manufacturing process minimize the use of energy- intensive

processes? (for example, multiple cycles of heating and cooling,
inefficient motors, see Motors Challenge Program page 63 etc.) 2 0

2) Do manufacturing processes use cogeneration, heat exchange or other

techniques to utilize wasted energy? 2 0

3) Is there minimal transportation between manufacturing and assembly points? 1 0

Total Points for Matrix Element B.2

Page 21
B.3: Product Manufacture, Solid Residue
(for each question circle one number)
For this product or component: Yes No

1) Are waste materials minimized and reused to the greatest extent possible during
manufacturing? (e.g., mold scrap, cutting scrap etc.) 1 0
2) Have raw material and parts suppliers been contacted to encourage them to minimize
the amounts and types of packaging materials entering your facility? 1 0

3) Has your company maximized the opportunities to reuse and reduce packaging
waste when parts are shipped between facilities? 1 0

4) Has intentional introduction of all lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent 2 0

chromium into the product materials been avoided?

Total Points for Matrix Element B.3

B.4: Product Manufacture, Liquid Residue

For the manufacture of this product or component: Yes No

1) If hazardous solvents or oils are used have alternatives been thoroughly

investigated? (see vendor lists in the Reference Information section for
information on alternative solvents and oils, if no solvents or oils are used
in the manufacturing process the answer is “2” or no environmental impact) 2 0

2) Are opportunities maximized to capture and reuse liquid by-products generated during
the manufacturing process? (if no solvents or oils are used in the
project the answer is “2” or no environmental impact) 1 0

3) Is the generation of water pollutants avoided or minimized? 2 0

Total Points for Matrix Element B.4

B.5: Product Manufacture, Gaseous Residue

For the manufacture of this product or component: Yes No

1) Is the generation of global warming or ozone-depleting gases avoided?

(see Climate-altering Chemical Index, page 60) 2 0

2) Is the generation of hazardous air pollutants avoided during the manufacturing

process? 2 0

3) Is the use of solvents, paints, coatings or adhesives with high evaporation rates
eliminated or minimized? (i.e., materials that emit high VOCs or volatile organic 1 0
compounds)
Total Points for Matrix Element B.5

Page 22
Distribution, Packaging
C.1: Distribution, Packaging, Materials Choice
(for each question circle one number)
For this product or component: Yes No

1) Have reusable transport packaging options been explored for

distribution between company facilities? 1 0

2) Have reusable transport packaging options been explored for

distribution between your company and your suppliers? 2 0

3) Are recycled materials used in the transport and retail packaging ? 1 0

4) Are recyclable materials used in the transport and retail packaging ?

5) Is the number of different types of materials used in the packaging minimized? 1 0

Total Points for Matrix Element C.1

C.2: Distribution, Packaging, Energy Use

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Is either reusable packaging or material of the lightest weight and volume, yet
functional transport and retail packaging material used? 5 0

Total Points for Matrix Element C.2

C.3: Distribution Packaging, Solid Residues

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Is the packaging designed for easy separation of materials for reuse or

recycling? 1 0

2) Are the types of packaging used commonly recycled? 2 0

3) Are the packaging materials clearly marked or easily identified by material type? 2 0
(e.g., plastics with resin type label etc.)

Total Points for Matrix Element C.3

Page 23
C.4: Distribution, Packaging, Liquid Residues
(for each question circle one number)
For this product or component: Yes No

1) Have maximum precautions been take to prevent hazardous liquid spills

during transport? (e.g., extra containment layers or safety valves, if there
are no hazardous liquids in the product or component the answer is
“5” or yes, for no environmental impact) 5 0

Total Points for Matrix Element C.4

C.5: Distribution, Packaging, Gaseous Residues

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Does the transport or retail packaging not contain chlorinated polymers or

plastics which may produce hazardous emissions if incinerated at low
temperatures? (see Polymers page 62) 3 0

2) Does the packaging not contain bromated flame retardants that may produce 2 0
hazardous emissions if incinerated at low temperatures?

Total Points for Matrix Element C.5

Product Use, Maintenance

D.1: Product Use, Maintenance, Materials Choice

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Is the product or component easily disassembled for upgrade, repair or

reuse? 1 0

2) Are parts readily available for the repair of this product or component? 1 0

3) Are potential barriers to recycling avoided such as using fillers, additives,

or imbedded metal threads in plastics, applying paint to plastics, or using
materials of unknown composition? 2 0

4) If plastics are used are they clearly marked by resin type? 1 0

Total Points for Matrix Element D.1

Page 24
D.2: Product Use, Maintenance, Energy Use
(for each question circle one number)
For this product or component: Yes No

1) Does the design facilitate minimal energy use while the product
is in service? 2 0

2) Can this product or component adjust energy use based on the level of 3 0
activity? (e.g. go into “sleep mode” during inactivity)

Total Points for Matrix Element D.2

D.3: Product Use, Maintenance, Solid Residue

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Does the design avoid building in disposable components such as “one-time- use”
cartridges, containers or batteries? 1 0

2) Are snaps, darts, screws of the same head type or other removable fasteners
used and are adhesive or welds avoided for joining parts to make it easier
to disassemble, repair, reuse or recycle? 2 0

3) Is this product designed to be easily repaired and/or upgraded rather than

replaced entirely? 2 0

Total Points for Matrix Element D.3

D.4: Product Use, Maintenance, Liquid Residue

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Does use of the product avoid the release of substances known to be water
pollutants? (see Hazardous Chemical Index, page 32) 5 0

Total Points for Matrix Element D.4

Page 25
D.5: Product Use, Maintenance, Gaseous Residue
(for each question circle one number)
For this product or component: Yes No

1) Is the emission of hazardous air pollutants avoided during use or maintenance?

(see Hazardous Chemicals List, page 32) 2 0

2) Is the emission of global warming and ozone- depleting gases avoided

during use or maintenance? (see Hazardous Chemical Index, page 32) 3 0

Total Points for Matrix Element D.5

End of Life

E.1: End of Life, Materials Choice

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Are the materials are easily reused or commonly recycled? 1 0

2) Are the materials easy to separate and identify by type? 1 0

3) Upon disposal are none of the materials required to be disposed of as

hazardous waste? 1 0

4) Has the intentional introduction of lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent 2 0

chromium into the product materials been avoided?

Total Points for Matrix Element E.1

E.2: End of Life, Energy Use

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Can the plastic or fiber parts be safely used for energy generation ?
(i.e., incineration, see Polymers on page 62, if there is no plastic or fiber
materials used the answer is “2” or yes)
2 0
2) Upon disposal are there no hazardous materials that need to be transported to
hazardous waste management facilities? (i.e., additional energy use
is required to transport materials for special handling) 3 0

Total Points for Matrix Element E.2

Page 26
E.3: End of Life, Solid Residues
(for each question circle one number)
For this product or component: Yes No

1) Does the infrastructure exist (inside or outside the company)

to recover/recycle the solid material(s)? 2 0

2) Does the product design avoid joining dissimilar materials in ways that
are difficult to reverse? 3 0

Total Points for Matrix Element E.3

E.4: End of Life, Liquid Residues

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Is the product designed so that problem liquid materials can be recovered

during disassembly? (if there are no liquids in the product or component
the answer is “5” or yes, for no environmental impact) 5 0

Total Points for Matrix Element E.4

E.5: End of Life, Gaseous Residues

For this product or component: Yes No

1) Is release of substances known to be ozone-depleting and/or global

warming gases avoided upon disposal of this product or component? 2 0
(see Climate-altering Chemical Index, page 32)

2) Can gases contained in the product be recovered at the time of disassembly

rather than lost? (if there are no gases contained in the product or component
the answer is “2” or yes) 1 0

3) Is release of substances known to be air pollutants avoided upon disposal of

this product or component? 2 0

Total Points for Matrix Element E.5

Page 27
Interpretation of
Results
At this point in the process, members of the design team evaluate the
product design(s) in light of the matrix scoring system. Discussion
regarding possible changes to the product design to improve the
environmental performance of the product take place.

The matrix scoring system allows the design team to:

• Score a product design as part of an overall product evaluation
• Compare alternative product designs
• Recognize areas where design changes are most imperative from an
environmental standpoint

What to do with the score

The matrix score is a relative measure of the attributes of the product. It

complements the economic, customer-value, manufacturability and other
parameters that may be evaluated. The matrix score should become part
of the overall assessment of a product and be used as an input in deciding
which product design will be pursued.

Comparing alternative product designs

Since many of the terms used in the questions are subjective, a rating
system that would be consistent among individual manufacturers, and
especially across industry lines, is virtually impossible. As design teams
adapt the toolkit to their own use, the scores will become relevant only
within the company itself. The rating score enables the manufacturer to
compare the environmental impact of alternative product designs. For
instance, one design for a particular product may achieve a ranking of 84,
while an alternative design for the same product may achieve only a 56.
Clearly, the first product design is superior from an environmental
perspective. When the scores are closer together (e.g. 63 versus 65),
then subjective determinations need to be made by the design team as to
the truly better product.

Recognizing needed changes

The design team should determine which design changes are truly
impossible given the state of the company and its products, and which
changes are reasonable efforts for the company to make. The challenge
is to avoid allowing processes to remain the same for the sake of
convenience, when reasonable changes could be implemented.

To prioritize possible improvements in a product, it is important to consider

design changes in the context of parameters other than the environment.

Page 28
Then the product improvements can be ranked from the most feasible to
the least feasible. Below are some questions that can be used to rank the
feasibility of design changes:

- Is the design change easy, moderate or impossible to implement?

- Would the product be significantly less costly, cost the same,

or cost more to produce if the product design change is incorporated?

- Does the design change have a very high, no, or negative perceived value
by most environmentally conscious consumers?

- Would the proposed design changes significantly decrease, not affect, or

significantly increase the amount of time required to develop and
manufacture the product?

Design Notes

Information learned from use of the matrix can be used to update and
improve company design specifications and notes to include
environmental preferences. For example, if mercury switches can be
replaced by non-mercury alternatives, the alternative switches should be
specified in any design notes or general company-wide parts/materials
specifications. Another example would be the specification of water-based
adhesives or paints as preferable materials or single-resin versus
multiple-resin plastics.

The integration of environmental attribute preferences into company

design documentation such as design notes will complement and reinforce
the use of DfE tools.

Page 29
Definitions
Air Pollutant A pollutant that is known to end up in the air once it is released to
the environment. (see Hazardous Chemicals List, page 38).

Bioaccumulative Chemicals that accumulate in living (plant or animal) tissues.

Through bioaccumulation, chemicals that are relatively low in concentration in air,
water or soil may reach relatively high levels in plants or animals. Elevated levels
of these chemicals are often toxic to the organisms.

Built-in Energy The amount of energy that has been invested in a material to
bring it to its present form. For instance, a plastic component that has been
formed through injection-molding has required a larger energy investment than
has the raw plastic grind that was used to produce the component. Although the
raw plastic grind has required a significant energy input to bring it to its present
level of refinement, it will require still more energy input (e.g. heating, pressure) to
become the plastic component. If a manufacturer is able to reuse materials in a
semi-processed form rather than first reducing it to a “raw” form, significantly less
energy is consumed in the process.

Global Warming Gases known to reside in the atmosphere and contribute to the
disruption of planetary weather and temperature [Link] gases essentially
act as insulation, preventing heat that has entered the atmosphere from escaping
back into space. (See also Climate-altering Chemical Index.)

Energy-intensive Processes that require large amounts of energy (electric, gas,

etc.).

Gaseous Residues Pollutants generated in a gas form. They include climate-

altering gases, odorants (foul-smelling chemicals), vapors, air pollutants and
others. (see Hazardous Chemical Index page38).

Hazardous A hazardous material is defined according to Department of Labor and

IndustriesOccupational Safety and Health Standards as a chemical or substance
that “is either toxic or highly toxic, an irritant, corrosive, a strong oxidizer, a
strong sensitizer, combustible, either flammable or extremely flammable,
dangerously reactive, pyrophoric, pressure-generating, a compressed gas, a
carcinogen, a teratogen, a mutagen, a reproductive toxic agent . . . .”

Liquid Residues Pollutants generated in a liquid form. They include solvents,

oil-slicks, water pollutants and others. (See also Hazardous Chemical Index.)

Nonrenewable A resource defined by the EPA as a material that is not

replaceable within a period of 200 years. These include fossil fuels, petroleum,
minerals, etc.

Ozone-depleting Gases known to contribute to the destruction of the ozone

layer. The ozone layer is a protective layer of gas surrounding the earth that
prevents much of the harmful ultraviolet rays generated by the sun from reaching
ground level. (See also Climate-altering Chemical Index.)

Page 30
Definitions Continued.

Recycled Materials that have been previously processed and are reused to
manufacture the same or different product. Pre-consumer recycling includes
the reuse of material that has been generated within the manufacturing process.
Deformed plastic parts, for instance, can be ground and reinjected to produce
an acceptable product. Post-consumer recycling is the reuse of products, or
their constituent materials, that have already been used and discarded by the
consumer. This type of recycling is preferable, as the material may otherwise be
incinerated and landfilled.

Recyclable Although many materials are potentially recyclable, for some there
does not exist a viable market to reuse the material. The end result, then, is the
same as for an intrinsically non-recyclable material, the product is landfilled or
incinerated. For the purposes of these questions, a recyclable material will be
one that can be reprocessed for use and one for which an active market exists
to use the reprocessed material. See Additional Resources for more information
on determining active markets.

Renewable Resources that are essentially limitless in their supply and do not
require replacement. Examples include solar, wind and geothermal energy.
Manufacturers should consider the source of their energy. Electricity generated
by wind props, for instance, would be considered a renewable resource.

Reusable A material or product that can be used again without reprocessing

constituent materials (as opposed to recyclable, which requires reprocessing).
Reusable water bottles are one example.

Reusable Transport Packaging Packaging materials that are durable for

repetitive use within a closed-loop shipping system. The closed-loop shipping
system can be between company facilities or between a company, its suppliers
or customers or a third party. Often these containers are collapsible or nest
within each other to save space on the return trip to their origination. Typically
these containers can provide additional protection to products because of their
durable nature.

Solids Residues Pollutants that are generated in a solid form. They include
contaminated soils, plastic litter (such as beverage can retaining rings),
discarded parts, or others.

Water Contaminant A pollutant that is known to end up in water resources

(e.g. lakes, rivers, groundwater) once released into the environment. (See
Hazardous Chemical Index page 35).

Page 31
 Index of Hazardous
Chemical Pollutants
(Sorted Alphabetically)

Explanation of Table
All of the chemical substances contained in this list are considered “hazardous”
materials. However, some hazardous materials may be much less detrimental to
the environment and should be considered for use in place of the more toxic
substances. This table is intended to provide information about the known
environmental impacts of the listed materials. The table can also be used for
decision making with regards to selecting materials for use that are the least
harmful to both the public health and the general environment.

Substance Substances are listed in alphabetical order, without regard to spaces,

numbers or prefixes such as a (alpha), b (beta), m (meta), n, N, o (ortho), p (para), s
(sec), or t (tert), except when names are otherwise equivalent. For instance, 1,2,4-
Trichlorobenzene is listed before 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, as -benzene comes before
-ethane alphabetically. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, however, is listed before 1,1,2-
Trichloroethane, as the chemical names are identical and the order must be based
upon the number prefix. In a similar manner, m-Xylene is listed before o-Xylene.

This score should become

part of the overall CAS # Chemical Abstract Service registry number. This is the identifying
assessment of a product number assigned by the Chemical Abstracts Service, a division of the American
Chemical Society. CAS numbers are published by the service in the Registry-
and be used as an input in
Common Names, which is updated annually.
deciding which product
design will be pursued. Title III The chemicals checked under this heading are substances subject to
reporting requirements under sections 302, 304 or 313 (TRI) of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) Title III and chemicals
listed under section 112(r) of Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAA) of
1990.

TRI The chemicals checked under this heading are only those substances
subject to reporting under section 313 of the SARA Title III through the Toxic
Chemical Release Inventory (TRI).

Codes The letter codes refer to individual agencies that have listed the substance
as a hazardous material (in addition to the other agencies referred to separately in
the index.)

The rating score enables A - American Conference of Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), “Threshold Limit
Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure
the manufacturer to
Indices for 1992-1993,” available from ACGIH, 6500 Glenway Avenue, Building D-
compare the 7, Cincinnati, Ohio 45211-4438.
environmental impact of
alternative product I - American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), “Workplace Environmental
designs. Exposure Level Guides” (1992), available from AIHA, 2700 Prosperity Place,
Merrifield, VA 22081.

Page 32
N - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),
“Recommendations for Occupational Safety and Health Standards,” August
1988, available from NIOSH, Publications Dissemination Office, Division of
Standards Development and Technology Transfer, 4676 Columbia Parkway,
Cincinnati, OH 45226.

O - Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Safety and Health

Standards, Code of Federal Regulations, title 29, part 1910, subpart Z, “Toxic
and Hazardous Substances, 1990.” General information: Minnesota
Department of Labor and Industry, Occupational Safety and Health Division,
443 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55101.

R - International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs on the

Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; Overall Evaluations of
Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42,
Supplement 7 (1987). Available from: WHO Publications Center USA, 49
Sheridan Avenue, Albany, NY 12210.

S - Occupational Safety and Health Administration proposed standards.

T - National Toxicology Program (NTP) “Seventh Annual Report on

Carcinogens,” 1991. Source: Department of Labor and Industry, Occupational
Safety and Health Standards. “Employee Right-to-know Standards.” Parts
5206.0100-5206.0400.

Air Pollutants The substances checked under this category are materials
listed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Air Quality Division as
hazardous air pollutants. “Facts about Air Quality Permit Rules,” January
1996.

Water Pollutants The substances checked under this category are materials
listed by the Environmental Protection Agency as “Pollutants of Initial Focus
in the Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative.” Code of Federal Regulations, 40
CFR Parts 9, 122, 123, 131, and 132. “Final Water Quality Guidance for the
Great Lakes System; Final Rule.” Vol. 60, No. 56; Thursday, March 23, 1995.
pp15393

Carcinogen The substances checked under this category are materials known
or suspected to be carcinogens, or cancer-causing agents, as determined by
OSHA, ACGIH, IARC, or the NTP. Roughly defined, a substance that is
determined to be carcinogenic is likely to produce higher rates of cancer among
populations exposed to the chemical for extended periods of time.

Endocrine Mimicker The substances checked under this category are

materials “with widespread distribution in the environment reported to have
reproductive and endocrine-disrupting effects.” Theo Colburn, Frederick S.
vom Saal, and Ana M. Soto: Developmental Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting
Chemicals in Wildlife and Humans. Environmental Health Perspectives.
August 1993. Endocrine mimickers generally interfere with the human
endocrine, or hormone, system, and can interfere with normal biological and
reproductive processes.

Bioaccumulative The substances checked under this category are materials

listed by the Environmental Protection Agency as “Pollutants of Initial Focus
in the Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative-Pollutants that are bioaccumulative
chemicals of concern”. Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR Parts 9,

Page 33
122,123, 131, and 132. “Final Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes
System; Final Rule.” Vol. 60, No. 56; Thursday, March 23, 1995. pp 15392.
Bioaccumulative chemicals are materials that accumulate in the living tissues of
plants or animals. Because of this ability, chemicals that are found in relatively
low concentrations in air, water or soil may reach extremely high levels of
toxicity in living organisms.

Rating: For a limited number of substances, a rating system has been devised
which rates air pollutants based on known attributes of the chemical, such as
its toxicity, persistence in the environment, availability to living organisms,
ability to spread through water, soil and air. The rating ranges from 0 to
approximately 21, with 21 being the greatest (negative) potential environmental
impact. It is a logarithmic scale, meaning that a substance with a rating of 15,
for example, is calculated to have 10 times the potential environmental impact
of a chemical with a rating of 14, one hundred times the potential impact of a
chemical with a rating of 13, and so forth.

More information on the rating system may be found in “An Indexing System
for Comparing Toxic Air Pollutants Based Upon Their Potential Environmental
Impacts.” Gregory C. Pratt, Paul E. Gerbec, Sherryl Livingston, Fardin
Oliaei, George Bollweg, Sally Paterson, and Donald Mackay. Chemosphere,
Vol. 27, No.8, pp1359-1379, 1993. Updated to July 1997 with material
obtained from Gregory C. Pratt, Division of Air Quality, Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency.

Disclaimer: Although every attempt has been made to assemble a thorough

and accurate list of materials, the authors do not guarantee the accuracy of
this chemical index. The user should not rely on the index to ensure regulatory
compliance. The absence of a chemical from the index does not necessarily
indicate that it is not regulated or reportable. The index is meant only to assist
the user in selecting materials. Manufacturers should consult the appropriate
updated lists provided under federal and state laws to determine chemical
reporting requirements.

Page 34
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Abate [see Temephos]
A-a-C (2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole R ,
Acenaphthene 83-32-9 , , 7.46
Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 , , ,
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 , , AO , 10.96
Acetamide 60-35-5 , , R , ,
Acetic Acid 64-19-7 , AO
Acetic Anhydride 108-24-7 , AO
Acetone 67-64-1 , AON 7.16
Acetone cyanohydrin 75-86-5 , , IN
Acetonitrile 75-05-8 , , ANO ,
Acetophenone 98-86-2 , , AI ,
2-Acetylaminoflourene 53-96-3 , , AI , ,
Acetylene 74-86-2 , ONT
Acetylene dichloride [see 1,2-Dichloroethylene]
Acetylene tetrabromide 79-27-6 AO
Acetylsalicylic acid 50-78-2 , A
Acrolein 107-02-8 , , AO , , 13.24
Acrylamide 79-06-1 , , ANOR , , 13.39
Acrylic acid 79-10-7 , , A , 11.74
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 , , ANORT , , , 13.10
Actinomycin D 50-76-0 , R ,
Adipic acid 124-04-9 , A
Adiponitrile 111-69-3 , A
Adriamycin 23214-92-8 RT ,
AF-2[2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl) acrylamide] 3688-53-7 R ,
Aflatoxins 1402-68-2 RT ,
Alachlor 15972-60-8 , , ,
Aldicarb 116-06-3 , , ,
Aldrin 309-00-2 , , AN , , 13.66
Allyl alcohol 107-18-6 , , AO
Allyl chloride (3-Chloroprene) 107-05-1 , , ANO , , 11.47
Allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) 106-92-3 ANO
Allylisothiocyanate 57-06-7 I
Allyl propyl disulfide 2179-59-1 AO
a-Alumina (Aluminum oxide) 1344-28-1 , , A 10.16
Aluminum (including alkyls) 7429-90-5 , , A , 13.96
2-Aminoanthraquinone 117-79-3 , , T ,
p-Aminoazobenzene 60-09-3 , , R ,
o-Aminoazotoluene (C.I. Solvent Yellow #3) 97-56-3 , , R ,
p-Aminobenzoic acid 150-13-0 I
Aminobiphenyl [see 4-Aminodiphenyl]
4-Aminodiphenyl 92-67-1 , , ANOT , ,
2-Aminoethanol [see Ethanolamine]
1-Amino-2-methylanthraquinone 82-28-0 , , T ,
2-Amino-5-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole R ,
2-Aminopyridine 504-29-0 AO
3-Amino 1,2,4-triazole [see Amitrole]
Amitrole 61-82-5 , , ART , ,
Ammonia 7664-41-7 , , ANOS 9.39
Ammonium chloride 12125-02-9 , A
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate 3825-26-1 A
Ammonium sulfamate 7773-06-0 , AO
n-Amyl acetate 628-63-7 , AO 8.12
s-Amyl acetate 626-38-0 , AO
Analgesic mixture containing phenacetin R ,

Page 35
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Aniline and homologues 62-53-3 , , AO , , 10.53
o-Anisidine 90-04-0 , , AOT , ,
p-Anisidine 104-94-9 , , AOT
o-Anisidine hydrochloride 134-29-2 , , T ,
Anthracene 120-12-7 , , R , , 4.05
Antimony and compounds, as Sb 7440-36-0 , , ANO , , 15.53
Antimony trioxide, handling and use, as Sb production 1309-64-4 , , A ,
ANTU (a-Naphthyl thiourea) 86-88-4 , AO
a-Aramite 140-57-8 R ,
Aroclors [see Polychlorinated biphenyls]
Arsenic, inorganic/organic, as As 7440-38-2 , , ANORT , , , 15.08
Arsine 7784-42-1 , ANO
Asbestos (all forms) 1332-21-4 , , ANORT , , ,
Asphalt (petroleum) fumes 8052-42-4 AN
Atrazine 1912-24-9 , , A ,
Auramine (technical grade) 492-80-8 , , R ,
Azaserine 115-02-6 , R ,
Azathioprine 446-86-6 RT ,
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) 86-50-0 , AO ,
Aziridine [see Ethyleneimine]
Barium, soluble compounds, as Ba 7440-39-3 , , AO 12.69
Barium, sulfate 7727-43-7 A
Baygon (Propoxur) 114-26-1 , , A ,
Baytex [see Fenthion]
Benomyl 17804-35-2 , , A ,
Benzaldehyde 100-52-7 I
1,2-Benzanthracene (Benz[a]anthracene) 56-55-3 , ART , ,
Benzene 71-43-2 , , ANORT , , , 11.16
Benzenethiol (Phenyl mercaptan, Thiophenol) 108-98-5 , AN
Benzidine 92-87-5 , , AONRT , , , 14.13
Benzidine-based dyes , , N , ,
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (Benzo[b]fluoranthene) 205-99-2 , ART , ,
11,12-Benzofluoranthene (Benzo[k]fluoranthene) 207-08-9 , R , ,
Benzo[j]fluoranthene 205-82-3 , R ,
Benzoic Acid 65-85-0 6.53
Benzoperylene (Benzo[ghi]perylene) 191-24-2 , ,
Benzophenone I
p-Benzoquinone [see Quinone]
Benzotrichloride 98-07-7 , , RT , ,
Benzoyl chloride 98-88-4 , , IN
Benzoyl peroxide 94-36-0 , , ANO
Benzo[a]pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene) 50-32-8 , ART , , 16.05
Benzyl acetate 140-11-4 A
Benzyl alcohol I
Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 , , ANO , , 10.48
Benzyl violet 4B R ,
Beryllium (and compounds) 7440-14-7 , , ANMORT , , ,
Biphenyl (Diphenyl) 92-52-4 , , AO , 3.97
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy) methane 111-91-1 , , ,
N,N-Bis-(2-chloroethyl)-w-naphthylamine (Chlornaphazine) 49-40-31 , R ,
Bischloroethyl nitrosourea (BCNU) 154-93-8 RT ,
Bis-(2-chloroethyl) ether (Dichloroethyl ether) 111-44-4 , , AO , , 12.66
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 108-60-1 , , I , 8.13
Bischloromethyl ether (BCME) 542-88-1 , , AORT , , 13.68
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate [see Di(2-ethyhexl)phthalate]
Bismuth telluride 1304-82-1 A

Page 36
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Bitumens (extracts of steam-refined/air-refined) 8052-42-4 R ,
Bleomycins R ,
Borates, tetra, sodium salts 1303-96-4 R
Boron oxide 1303-86-2 AO
Boron tribromide 10294-33-4 A
Boron trifluoride 7637-07-2 , , ANO
Bromacil 314-40-9 , , A
Bromochloromethane [see Chlorobromomethane]
Bromodichloromethane (Dichlorobromomethane) 75-27-4 , , , , 11.26
Bromoform 75-25-2 , , AO , , 13.17
Bromomethane [see Methyl bromide]
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 101-55-3 , ,
Bromotrifluoromethane [see Trifluorobromomethane]
1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 , , ANOR , , 12.35
Butane 106-97-8 , A
1,4-Butanediol dimethylsulfonate (Myleran) 55-98-1 RT ,
Butanethiol [see Butyl mercaptan]
2-Butanone [see Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)]
2-Butoxyethanol (EGBE) 111-76-2 AO 9.19
n-Butyl acetate 123-86-4 , AO 8.31
s-Butyl acetate 105-46-4 , AO
t-Butyl acetate 540-88-5 , AO
Butyl acrylate 141-32-2 , , A
n-Butyl alcohol 71-36-3 , , AO 7.50
s-Butyl alcohol 78-92-2 , , AO
t-Butyl alcohol 75-65-0 , , AO 9.30
Butylamine 109-73-9 , AO
Butyl benzyl phthalate 85-68-7 , , 10.14
Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) 25013-16-5 R ,
4-t-Butylcatechol I
Butyl cellosolve [see 2-Butoxy ethanol]
Butylene oxide ,
106-99-9&106-88-7 , I
n-Butyl glycidyl ether (BGE) 2426-08-6 AO
n-Butyl lactate 138-22-7 A
Butyl mercaptan 109-79-5 ANO
o-s-Butylphenol 89-72-5 A
p-t-Butyltoluene 98-51-1 AO
Butyraldehyde 123-72-8 , , I
a-Butyrolactone R ,
n-Butyronitrile 109-74-0 N
Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) 7440-43-9 , , ANRT , , , 16.00
Cadmium, dust and salts (as Cd), fume 7440-43-9 , , ANO , 16.00
Cadmium oxide, fume (as Cd) 1306-19-0 , ANO
Cadmium oxide production (as Cd) , A ,
Calcium chromate 13765-19-0 , ART ,
Calcium cyanamide 156-62-7 , , A ,
Calcium hydroxide 1305-62-0 , A
Calcium oxide 1305-78-8 AO
Calcium sulfate (Gypsum) 7778-18-9 A
Camphor, synthetic 76-22-2 AO
Caprolactam 105-60-2 , A , 7.99
Captafol 2425-06-1 , A
Captan 133-06-2 , , A ,
Carbaryl (Sevin) 63-25-2 , , ANO , ,
Carbofuran (Furadan) 1563-66-2 , , A
Carbon black 1333-86-4 ANOR ,

Page 37
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Carbon diflouride [see Carbonyl flouride]
Carbon dioxide 124-38-9 ANO
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 , , ANO , 11.39
Carbon monoxide 630-08-0 ANO 9.70
Carbon tetrabromide 558-13-4 A
Carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane) 56-23-5 , , ANORT , , , 15.36
Carbonyl chloride [see Phosgene]
Carbonyl fluoride (Carbon difluoride) 353-50-4 , A
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 , , ,
Carrageenan, degraded 9000-07-01 R ,
Catechol (Pyrocatechol) 120-80-9 , , A , 7.81
Cellosolve acetate [see 2-Ethoxyethyl acetate]
Ceramic fibers (respirable size) ,
Cesium hydroxide 21351-79-1 A
Chloramben 133-90-4 , , ,
Chlorambucil 305-03-3 , RT ,
Chloramphenicol 56-75-7 IR ,
Chlordane 57-74-9 , , AO , , , , , 13.30
Chlordecone (Kepone) 143-50-0 , , NRT ,
Chlorendic acid 115-28-6 , , T ,
Chlorinated camphene (Toxaphene) 8001-35-2 , , AOT , , ,
Chlorinated diphenyl oxide 31242-93-0 AOT
Chlorinated paraffins (C12, 60% Chlorine) 108171-26-2 T ,
a-Chlorinated toluenes R ,
Chlorine 7782-50-5 , , ANO , 10.22
Chlorine dioxide 10049-04-4 , , AO 10.71
Chlorine trifluoride 7790-91-2 AO
Chloroacetaldehyde 107-20-0 , AO
Chloroacetic acid (mono-) 79-11-8 , , ,
Chloroacetone 78-95-5 A
2-Chloroacetophenone (Phenylacylchloride) 532-27-4 , , AO , 13.59
Chloroacetyl chloride 79-04-9 A
4-Chloroanaline 106-47-8 , 8.21
Chlorobenzene (mono-) 108-90-7 , , AO , , 10.14
Chlorobenzilate 510-15-6 , , ,
o-Chlorobenzylidene malonitrile (OCBM) 2698-41-1 AO
Chlorobromomethane 74-97-5 AO
2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene [see Chloroprene]
p-Chloro-m-cresol 59-50-7 , ,
Chlorodibromomethane 124-48-1 , , 11.88
Chlorodifluoromethane (Fluorocarbon 22) 75-45-6 , , A
Chlorodiphenyl (PCB) , , AORT , , , ,
42% chlorine 53469-21-9
54% chlorine 11097-69-1
1-Chloro, 2,3-epoxy-propane [see Epichlorohydrin]
Chlor(o)ethane 75-00-3 , , N ,
2-Chloroethanol [see Ethylene chlorohydrin]
Chloroethylene [see Vinyl chloride]
1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) 13010-47-4 RT ,
1-(2-Chloro ethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)- 13909-09-6 R ,
1-nitrosourea (methyl-CCNU)
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 110-75-8 , ,
Chloroform (Trichloromethane) 67-66-3 , , ANORT , , , 14.17
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether [see Bis(2-chloro...]
Chloromethane [see Methyl chloride)
bis(Chloromethyl) ether (BCME) [see Bischloromethyl...] 542-88-1 , , ANO ,

Page 38
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Chloromethyl methyl ether [see Methyl chloromethyl ether] 107-30-2
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol [see p-Chloro-m-cresol]
3-Chloro-2-methylpropene 563-47-3 , , T ,
2-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 , ,
1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene 88-73-3 9.45
1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene (p-Nitrochlorobenzene) 100-00-5 AO 9.54
1-Chloro-1-nitropropane 600-25-9 AO
Chloropentafluoroethane (Fluorocarbon 115) 76-15-3 A
Chlorophenol 106-48-9 , R ,
2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 , , 8.31
4-Chloro-o-phenylenediamine 95-83-0 RT ,
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 7005-72-3 , ,
Chlorophenoxy herbicides R ,
Chloropicrin [Trichloronitromethane) 76-06-2 , , AO
Chloroprene 126-99-8 , , ANO , , 9.46
3-Chloroprene [see Allyl chloride]
2-Chloropropionic acid 598-78-7 A
p-Chloro-o-toluidine 95-69-2 , , R ,
o-Chlorostyrene 2039-87-4 A
Chlorosulfonic acid 7790-94-5 , I
o-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 A
2-Chloro-6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine [see Nitrapyrin] 1929-82-4
Chloropyrifos 2921-88-2 , A ,
Chlorotrifluoroethylene 79-38-9 , I
Chromic acid 7738-94-5 , NO
Chromite ore processing (Chromate), as Cr , A ,
Chromium metal 7440-47-3 , , AO ,
Chromium (II) compounds, as Cr , , A ,
Chromium (III) compounds, as Cr , , A , 12.12
Chromium (VI) compounds, as Cr (water soluble) , , ANO ,
Chromium (VI) compounds , , AN , , 15.63
Chromium (VI) compounds, certain water insoluble ones , , ANORT
Chromyl chloride 14977-61-8 A ,
Chrysene 218-01-9 , AN , ,
Chrysotile [see Asbestos]
C.I. Basic Red 9 Monohydrochloride 569-61-9 T ,
C.I. Solvent Yellow #3 [see o-Aminoazotoluene]
C.I. Direct Black 38 (technical grade) 1937-37-7 , , RT ,
C.I. Direct Blue 6 (technical grade) 2602-46-2 , , RT ,
C.I. Direct Brown 95 (technical grade) 16071-86-6 , , R ,
Cisplatin 15663-27-1 R ,
Citrus Red No. 2 R ,
Clopidol 2971-90-6 A
Coal, dust AO
Coal tars, coal tar pitches, and coal tar ANORT ,
pitch volatiles (as benzene solubles) 65996-93-2
Cobalt, elemental and inorganic compounds, as Co 7440-48-4 , , A
Cobalt, metal dust and fume, as Co 7440-48-4 , , ANO ,
Cobalt carbonyl, as Co 10210-68-1 , , A
Cobalt hydrocarbonyl, as Co 16842-03-8 A
Coke oven emissions , NOT , ,
Conjugated estrogens RT ,
Copper 7440-50-8 , , , 15.06
Copper dust and mists, as Cu 7440-50-8 , , AO
Copper fume 7440-50-8 , , AO
Cotten dust, raw ANO

Page 39
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Crag herbicide [see Sodium-2,4-dichlorophenoxyethyl sulfate] 136-78-7
Creosotes 8001-58-9 , , R ,
p-Cresidine 120-71-8 , , RT ,
Cresol, all isomers 1319-77-3 , , ANO , 8.82
m-Cresol 108-39-4 , , ANO , 8.30
o-Cresol 95-48-7 , , ANO , 7.22
p-Cresol 106-44-5 , , ANO , 7.46
Cristobalite [see Silica-crystalline]
Crocidolite [see Asbestos]
Crotonaldehyde 4170-30-3 , , AO ,
Crufomate 299-86-5 A
Cumene 98-82-8 , , AO ,
Cupferron 135-20-6 , , T ,
Cyanamide 420-04-2 A
Cyanides, as Cn ,
151-50-8&143-33-9 AO , ,
Cyanogen 460-19-5 , A
Cyanogen chloride 506-77-4 , A
Cycasin 14901-08-7 R ,
Cyclohexane 110-82-7 , , AO 7.94
Cyclohexanethiol 1569-69-3 N
Cyclohexanol 108-93-0 , , AO
Cyclohexanone 108-94-1 , ANO 5.02
Cyclohexene 110-83-8 AO
Cyclohexylamine 108-91-8 , A
Cyclonite (RDX) 121-82-4 A
Cyclopentadiene 542-92-7 AO
Cyclopentane 287-92-3 A
Cyclophosphamide 50-18-0 , RT ,
Cyhexatin 13121-70-5 A
2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 94-75-7 , , AO , , , 9.46
Dacarbazine 4342-03-04 RT ,
Daunomycin 20830-81-3 , R ,
DBCP [see 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane]
DDD 72-54-8 , , , 14.57
DDE 72-55-9 , , , , 13.78
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) 50-29-3 , ANORT , , , , 14.21
DDVP [see Dichlorvos]
DEHP [see Di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate]
Decaborane 17702-41-9 , AO
Decabromodiphenyl oxide 1163-19-5 , , I
Demeton [see Systox] 8065-48-3
Diacetone alcohol 123-42-2 ANO
N,N-Diacetylbenzidine R ,
2,4-Diaminoanisole and its salts 615-05-4 , , N ,
2,4-Diaminoanisole sulfate 39156-41-7 , , T ,
4,4'-Diaminodiphenyl ether [see 4,4'-Oxydianiline]
1,2-Diaminoethane [see Ethylenediamine]
2,4-Diaminotoluene (Toluene 2,4-diamine) 95-80-7 , , IRT , , 14.36
o-Dianisidine dihydrochloride 20325-40-0 , , N ,
o-Dianisidine hydrochloride 111984-09-9 , , N ,
Diazinon 333-41-5 , , A ,
Diazomethane 334-88-3 , , AO , ,
Dibenz[a,h]acridine 226-36-8 , RT ,
Dibenz[a,j]acridine 224-42-0 , RT ,
1,2:5,6-Dibenzanthracene (Dibenz[a,h]anthracene) 53-70-3 , RT , ,
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole 194-59-2 , RT ,

Page 40
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Dibenzofurans 132-64-9 , , , 9.05
Dibenzo[a,e]pyrene 129-65-4 , R ,
Dibenzo[a,h]pyrene 189-64-0 , RT ,
Dibenzo[a,i]pyrene 189-55-9 , RT ,
Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene 191-30-0 , R ,
Diborane 19287-45-7 , AO
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) 96-12-8 , , NORT , , , 15.94
1,2-Dibromoethane [see Ethylene dibromide]
Dibrom (Dimethyl-1,2-dibromo-2-dichloroethyl phosphate) 300-76-5 , , A
2-N-Dibutylaminoethanol 102-81-8 A
Dibutylphenylphosphate 2528-36-1 A
Dibutyl phosphate 107-66-4 AO
Dibutyl phthalate 84-74-2 , , AO , , 9.97
Dichloroacetylene 7572-29-4 A ,
1,2-Dichlorobenzene (o-Dichlorobenzene) 95-50-1 , , AO , 7.92
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 , , ,
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 , , AORT , , , 10.43
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 , , ANORT , , , 5.75
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine dihydrochloride 612-83-9 , , T ,
Dichlorobromomethane [see Bromodichloromethane]
1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 764-41-0 , , A
3,3'-Dichloro-4,4'-diaminophenyl ether R ,
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Fluorocarbon 12) 75-71-8 , , AO
1,3-Dichloro-5,5-dimethyl hydantoin 118-52-5 AO
1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 , , ANORT , , , 10.71
1,2-Dichloroethane [see Ethylene dichloride]
1,1-Dichloroethylene [see Vinylidene chloride]
1,2-Dichloroethylene 540-59-0 , , AO , 6.87
Dichloroethyl ether [see Bis-(2-chloroethyl0 ether] 111-44-4
Dichlorofluoromethane [see Dichloromonofluoromethane] 75-43-4
Dichloromethane [see Methylene chloride]
Dichloromonofluoromethane (Fluorocarbon-21) 75-43-4 , , AO
1,1-Dichloro-1-nitroethane 594-72-9 AO
2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 , , , 9.72
1,2-Dichloropropane [see Propylene dichloride]
1,3-Dichloropropane (technical grade) 542-75-6 , , RT , , , 10.62
Dichloropropene 542-75-6 , , A
2,2-Dichloropropionic acid 75-99-0 , A
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (Fluorocarbon 114) 76-14-2 , , AO
Dichlorvos (DDVP) 62-73-7 , , AO ,
Dicofol 115-32-2 , , ,
Dicrotophos 141-66-2 , A
Dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate 5124-30-1 , N
Dicyclopentadiene 77-73-6 , , A
Dicyclopentadienyl iron 102-54-5 A
Dieldrin 60-57-1 , ANO , , , , 14.94
Dienoestrol 84-17-3 R ,
Diepoxybutane 1464-53-5 , , T ,
Di-2,3-epoxy propyl ether N ,
Diethanolamine 111-42-2 , , A , 2.71
Diethylamine 109-89-7 , AO 8.24
2-Diethylaminoethanol 100-37-8 AO
Diethylene dioxide [see 1,4-Dioxane]
Diethylene glycol 111-46-6 I
Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether I
Diethylene tramine 111-40-0 A

Page 41
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Diethyl ether [see Ethyl ether]
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) 117-81-7 , , AONRT , , , 12.42
Diethyl hydrazine R ,
Diethyl ketone 96-22-0 A
Diethyl phthalate 84-66-2 , A , 7.99
Diethylstilbestrol 56-53-1 , RT ,
Diethyl sulfate 64-67-5 , , RT , ,
Difluorodibromomethane (FREON 12B2) 75-61-6 AO
Diglycidyl resorcinol ether (DGE) 101-90-6 , , ANORT ,
Dihydrosafrole 94-58-6 , , R ,
Dihydroxybenzene [see Hydroquinone]
Diisobutyl ketone 108-83-8 ANO
Diisobutylene 25167-70-8 IN
Diisocyanates (not including those listed separately) , N
Diisopropylamine 108-18-9 ANO
3,3' Dimethoxybenzidine (o-Dianisidine) 119-90-4 , , RT , ,
Dimethoxymethane [see Methylal]
Dimethyl acetamide 127-19-5 AO
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene 60-11-7 , , NORT , ,
Dimethylaminobenzene [see Xylidene]
trans-2-2[(Dimethylamino)methylimino] ,
-5-[2-(5-nitro-2-furyl)vinyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole R
Dimethylaniline (N,N-Dimethylaniline) 121-69-7 , , AO
Dimethylbenzene [see Xylene]
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine [see o-Tolidine]
Dimethylcarbamoyl chloride 79-44-7 , , ART , ,
Dimethyl-1,2-dibromo-2-dichloroethyl
phosphate [see Dibrom] 300-76-5
N-Dimethyl ether (Methyl ether) 115-10-6 , I
Dimethylformamide (N-methylformamide) 68-12-2 , , AO , 8.74
2,6-Dimethyl-4-heptanone [see Diisobutyl ketone]
1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 , , ANORT , ,
1,2-Dimethylhydrazine R ,
Dimethylnitrosoamine [see N-Nitrosodimethylamine]
2,4-Dimethylphenol (2,4-Xylenol) 105-67-9 , , , 10.51
Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 , , AO , , 7.67
Dimethyl sulfate 77-78-1 , , AOTR , ,
Dimethyl terephthalate 120-61-6 I
Dimethylvinyl chloride 513-37-1 T ,
Dinitolmide [see 3,5-Dinitro-o-toluamide] 148-01-6
m-Dinitrobenzene 99-65-0 , , AO
o-Dinitrobenzene 528-29-0 , , AO
p-Dinitrobenzene 100-25-4 , , AO
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol (DNOC, 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) 534-52-1 , , ANO , ,
2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 , , , , 11.51
3,5-Dinitro-o-toluamide (Zoalene) 148-01-6 A
Dinitrotoluene-mixed isomers 25321-14-6 , , ANO , , ,
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 , , ANO , , , 11.98
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 , , ANO , , , 11.47
Dioctyl phthalate 117-84-0 , ,
1,4-Dioxane (Diethylene dioxide) 123-91-1 , , ANORT , , 11.35
Dioxathion (Delanov) 78-34-2 , A
Dioxins [see 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin]
Diphenyl [see Biphenyl] 92-52-4
Diphenylamine 122-39-4 , , A
Diphenyl ether [see Phenyl ether]

Page 42
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (Hydrazobenzene) 122-66-7 , , T , , , 11.84
Diphenylmethane diisocyanate [see
Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI)]
Dipropylene glycol methyl ether 34590-94-8 AO
Dipropyl ketone (4-Heptanone) 123-19-3 A
Di-s-octyl phthalate [see Di[2-ethylhexyl]phthalate]
Diquat dust 231-36-7 A
Disulfiram 97-77-8 , A
Disulfoton (Disyston) 298-04-4 , A
2,6-Di-t-butyl-p-cresol 128-37-0 A
Diuron 330-54-1 , , A
Divinyl benzene 1321-74-0 A
Dust, Inert or Nuisance A
Including:
Aluminum, metal and oxide
Calcium carbonate
Calcium silicate
Calcium sulfate
Cellulose (paper fiber)
Emery
Glycerin Mist
Graphite (synthetic)
Gypsum
Kaolin
Limestone
Magnestite
Marble
Mineral Wool Fiber
Pentaerythritol
Perlite
Plaster of Paris
Portland Cement
Precipitated Silica
Rouge
Silica gel
Silicon
Silicon carbide
Starch
Stearates
Sucrose
Titanium Dioxide
Vegetable oil mists (except castor, cashew nut, or
similar irritant oils)
Zinc stearate
Zinc oxide dust
Dyfonate [see Fonofos]
Emery 1302-74-5 A
a-Endosulfan 959-98-8 , A , , 11.35
b-Endosulfan 33213-65-9 , A , , 11.35
Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 , ,
Endrin 72-20-8 , AO ,
Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 , ,
Enflurane 13838-16-9 A
Enzymes [see Subtilisins]
Epichlorohydrin (1-Chloro-2,3-epoxy propane) 106-89-8 , , ANORT , , 12.95
EPN 2104-64-5 , AO

Page 43
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
1,2-Epoxybutane (1,2-Butylene oxide) 106-88-7 , , ,
1,2-Epoxypropane [see Propylene oxide]
2,3-Epoxy-1-propanol [see Glycidol]
Erionite 66733-21-9 R ,
Erythromycin 114-07-8 I
Estrogens (not conjugated): ,
Estradiol 50-28-2 T
Estrone 53-16-7 T
Ethinyl estradiol 57-63-6 T
Mestranol 72-33-3 T
Ethane 74-84-0 , A
Ethanethiol [see Ethyl mercaptan]
Ethanol [see Ethyl alcohol]
Ethanolamine 141-43-5 A 8.67
Ethinyl-oestradiol 57-63-6 R ,
Ethion 563-12-2 , A
2-Ethoxyethanol 110-80-5 , , ANO 9.44
2-Ethoxyethyl acetate 111-15-9 AO 9.86
Ethylacetate 141-78-6 , AO 6.83
Ethyl acrylate 140-88-5 , , AORT , , 9.18
Ethyl alcohol 64-17-5 AO 7.74
Ethylamine (mono-) 75-04-7 , AO 8.69
Ethyl amyl ketone (5-Methyl-3-heptanone) 541-85-5 AO
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 , , AO , , 8.95
Ethyl bromide 74-96-4 AO ,
Ethyl butyl ketone (3-Heptanone) 106-35-4 AO
Ethyl carbamate [see Urethane]
Ethyl chloride 75-00-3 , , AO , 9.22
Ethylene 74-85-1 , , A
Ethylene chlorohydrin (Chloroethanol) 107-07-3 , AO
Ethylenediamine 107-15-3 , AO
Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane) 106-93-4 , , ANORT , , 14.75
Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane) 107-06-2 , , ANOT , , , 13.89
Ethylene glycol, particulate and vapor 107-21-1 , , A , 7.26
Ethylene glycol dinitrate (EGDN) 628-96-6 ANO
Ethylene glycol methyl ether acetate 110-49-6 AO
Ethyleneimine (Aziridine) 151-56-4 , , ANO , ,
Ethylene oxide 75-21-8 , , ANOSRT , , 11.67
Ethylene thiourea 96-45-7 , , NRT , ,
Ethyl ether 60-29-7 , AO
Ethyl formate 109-94-4 A 8.96
Ethylidene dichloride [see 1,1-Dichloroethane]
Ethylidene norbornene 16219-75-3 A
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 , ANO
Ethyl methanesulfonate 62-50-0 , R ,
N-Ethylmorpholine 100-74-3 AO
N-Ethyl-N-nitrosourea R ,
Ethyl silicate 78-10-4 AO
Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 , A
Fensulfothion 115-90-2 , A
Fenthion 55-38-9 , , A
Ferbam 14484-64-1 , , AO
Ferrovanadium; dust 12604-58-9 AO
Fibrous glass dust [see Glass]
Fluoranthene 206-44-0 , , 10.83
Fluorene 86-73-7 , , 9.68

Page 44
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Fluoride, as F, as dust 16984-48-8 ANO
Fluorides, inorganic N
Fluorine 7782-41-4 , , AO
Fluorocarbon, Polymers N
Fluorocarbon 11 [see Trichlorofluoromethane] 75-69-4
Fluorocarbon 12 [see Dichlorodifluoromethane]
Fluorocarbon 13b1 [see Trifluoromonobromomethane]
Fluorocarbon 21[see Dichloromonofluoromethane]
Fluorocarbon 22 [see Chlorodifluoromethane]
Fluorocarbon 112 [see 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro-
1,2-difluoroethane]
Fluorocarbon 112a [see 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloro-
2,2-difluoroethane]
Fluorocarbon 113 [see 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane]
Fluorocarbon 114 [see Dichlorotetrafluoroethane]
Fluorocarbon 115 [see Chloropentafluoroethane]
Fluorotrichloromethane [see Trichlorofluoromethane]
Fonofos 944-22-9 , AO
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 , , ANORT , , 10.91
Formamide 75-12-7 A
Formic acid 64-18-6 , , AO
2-(2-Formylhydrazino)-4-(5-nitro-2-furyl)thiazole R ,
Furan, tetrahydro- [see Tetrahydrofuran]
Furfural 98-01-1 , A
Furfuryl alcohol 98-00-0 AN
Gallium arsenide 7440-55-3 N ,
Gases, simple asphyxiants: A
Acetylene
Argon
Ethane
Ethylene
Helium
Hydrogen
Methane
Neon
Propane
Propylene
Gasoline 8006-61-9 A
Germanium tetrahydride 7782-65-2 A
Glass, fibrous or dust AN ,
Glu-P-1(2-Amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3;2'-d])-imidazole R ,
Glu-P-2(2-Aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3,2'-d])-imidazole R ,
Gluteraldehyde 111-30-8 A
Glycerin mist 56-81-5 A
Glycidaldehyde 765-34-4 , R ,
Glycidol (2,3-Epoxy-1-propanol) 556-52-5 AO ,
Glycidyl ethers N ,
Glycol ethers , ,
Glycol monoethyl ether [see 2-Ethoxyethanol]
Glycolonitrile (Formaldehyde cyanohydrin) 107-16-4 N
Grain dust (oat, wheat, barley) A
Graphite (all forms except graphite fibers) 7782-42-5 AO
Griseofulvin R ,
Guthion [see Azinphos-methyl]
Gypsum [see Calcium sulfate] 13397-24-5
Gyromitrin (Acetaldehyde formylmethyl hydrazone) 16568-02-8 R ,

Page 45
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Hafnium 7440-58-6 AO
Halothane 151-67-7 AN
Halowax [see Trichloronapthalene]
HCFC-21 [see Dichloromonofluoromethane]
Heptachlor 76-44-8 , , AO , , , , 13.12
Heptachlor epoxide 1024-87-3 , AO , , , , 14.77
Heptane (n-Heptane) 142-82-5 ANO
2-Heptanone [see Methyl n-amyl ketone]
3-Heptanone [see Ethyl butyl ketone]
Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 , , AT , , , , , 15.55
Hexachlorobutadiene 76-68-3 , A , , , ,
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 , 14.63
Hexachlorocyclohexane isomers (including Lindane) , , RT , , , 13.80
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 , , A , , 12.12
Hexachloronaphthalene (Halowax 1014) 1335-87-1 , , AO , , , 14.19
Hexadiene 592-42-7 I
Hexafluoroacetone 684-16-2 A
Hexamethylene diamine 124-09-4 , I
Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate 822-06-0 , AN ,
Hexamethylphosphoramide 680-31-9 , , ART , ,
Hexane (n-Hexane) 110-54-3 , , ANO , 9.57
Hexane, other isomers 107-83-5;107-83-2, A
1,6-Hexanediamine 124-09-4 A
1,6-Hexanediol diacrylate 13048-33-4 I
1-Hexanethiol 111-31-9 N
2-Hexanone [see Methyl n-butyl ketone] 591-78-6
Hexone [see Methyl isobutyl ketone] 108-10-1
s-Hexyl acetate 108-84-9 AO
Hexylene glycol 107-41-5 A
Hydrazine 302-01-2 , , ANORT , , 12.70
Hydrazine sulfate 10034-93-2 , , T ,
Hydrazobenzene [see 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine]
Hydrochloric acid 7647-01-1 , , ,
Hydrogen 1333-74-0 , A
Hydrogenated terphenyls 61788-32-7 A
Hydrogen bromide 10035-10-6 AO
Hydrogen chloride 7647-01-0 , , AO 9.40
Hydrogen cyanide 74-90-8 , , ANO 10.93
Hydrogen flouride, as F 7664-39-3 , , ANO ,
Hydrogen peroxide 7722-84-1 , A
Hydrogen selenide, as Se 7783-07-5 , AO
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 , ANO 12.19
Hydroquinone 123-31-9 , , ANO ,
4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone [see Diacetone alcohol]
2-Hydroxypropyl acrylate 999-61-1 A
Indene 95-13-6 A
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (2,3-o-phenylene pyrene) 193-39-5 , RT , ,
Iodine 7553-56-2 AO
Iodoform 75-47-8 A
Iodomethane [see Methyl iodide]
IQ (2-Amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline) R ,
Iron ,
Iron dextran complex 9004-66-4 RT ,
Iron pentacarbonyl, as Fe 13463-40-6 , , A
Iron salts, soluble, as Fe A
Isoamyl acetate 123-92-2 , AO

Page 46
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Isoamyl alcohol 123-51-3 AO
Isobutyl acetate 110-19-0 , AO
Isobutyl alcohol 78-83-1 , AO
Isobutyronitrile 78-82-0 , N
Isocyanuric acid 108-80-5 I
Isooctyl alcohol 26952-21-6 A
Isophorone 78-59-1 , ANO , , 7.64
Isophorone diisocyanate 4098-71-9 , AN
Isophthalic acid I
Isoprene 78-79-5 , I
Isopropoxyethanol 109-59-1 A
Isopropyl acetate 108-21-4 AO
Isopropyl acetone [see Methyl isobutyl ketone]
Isopropyl alcohol 67-63-0 , , ANO 7.84
Isopropylamine 75-31-0 , A
N-Isopropylaniline 768-52-5 A
Isopropyl benzene 98-82-8 10.44
Isopropyl ether 108-20-3 AO
Isopropyl glycidil ether (IGE) 4016-14-2 ANO
Kaolin dust 1332-58-7 A
Kepone [see Chlordecone] 143-50-0
Ketene 463-51-4 AO
Lasiocarpine 303-34-4 , R ,
Lead, as Pb 7439-92-1 , , ANO , , , , 15.55
Lead acetate 301-04-2 , T ,
Lead chromate, as Pb and Cr 7758-97-6 , ART ,
Lead phosphate 7446-27-7 , T ,
Lindane (and other hexachlorocyclohexane isomers) 58-89-9 , , AOT , , , 13.79
Lithium hydride 7580-67-8 , AO
Lithium hydroxide (and monohydrate) 1310-65-2 I
Lithium oxide 12057-24-8 I
L.P.G. (Liquid Petroleum Gas) 68476-85-7 AO
Magnesite 546-93-0 A
Magnesium oxide fume 1309-48-4 AO
Malathion 121-75-5 , , ANO ,
Maleic anyhydride 108-31-6 , , AO , 7.63
Malononitrile 109-77-3 , , N
Mancozeb I ,
Maneb 12427-38-2 , , ,
Manganese, elemental and compounds, as Mn 7439-96-5 , , AO , 13.38
Manganese cyclopentadienyltricarbon, as Mn 12079-65-1 A
Manganese tetroxide 1317-35-7 A
MBOCA [see 4,4'-Methylenebis[2-Chloroaniline]]
*MeA-a-C(2-Amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole) R ,
Medroxyprogesterone acetate R ,
Melphalan 148-82-3 , RT ,
Mercaptoacetic acid [see Thioglycolic acid]
Mercaptoethanol I
Mercury compounds, as Hg 7439-97-6 , , AN , , , 19.80
Merphalan R ,
Mesityl oxide 141-79-7 ANO
Mestranol 72-33-3 R
Methacrylic acid 79-41-4 A
Methane 74-82-8 , A
Methanethiol [see Methyl Mercaptan]
Methanol [see Methyl alcohol]

Page 47
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Methomyl (Lannate) 16752-77-5 , A ,
Methoxsalen with ultra-violet A therapy (PUVA) RT ,
Methoxychlor 72-43-5 , , AO , , ,
2-Methoxyethanol (Methyl cellusolve) 109-86-4 , , AO 10.47
2-Methoxyethyl acetate [see Ethylene glycol methyl ether acetate]
4-Methoxyphenol 150-76-5 A
3-Methoxypropylamine 5332-73-0 I
Methyl acetate 79-20-9 AO
Methyl acetylene (Propyne) 74-99-7 , AO
Methyl acetylene-propadiene mixture (MAPP) 59355-75-8 AO
Methyl acrylate 96-33-3 , , AO 7.21
Methyl acrilonitrile 126-98-7 , , A
Methylal (Dimethoxy methane) 109-87-5 AO
Methyl alcohol (Methanol) 67-56-1 , , ANO , 7.50
Methylamine (mono-) 74-89-5 , AO
Methyl amyl alcohol [see Methyl isobutyl carbinol]
Methyl n-amyl ketone (2-Heptanone) 110-43-0 ANO
N-Methyl aniline 100-61-8 AO
2-Methylaziridine [see Propyleneimine]
Methylazoxymethanol and its acetates R ,
Methyl benzene [see Toluene]
Methyl bromide (Bromomethane) 74-83-9 , , ANO , , , 13.50
Methyl t-butyl ether 1634-04-4 , , I , 9.74
Methyl-n-butyl ketone (2-Hexanone) 591-78-6 ANO
Methyl cellosolve [see 2-Methoxyethanol]
Methyl cellusolve acetate [see Ethylene glycol methyl
ether acetate]
Methyl chloride (Chloromethane) 74-87-3 , , ANO , , 12.83
Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane) 71-55-6 , , ANO , ,
Methyl chloromethyl ether (Chloromethyl methyl ether) 107-30-2 , , ANO , ,
5-Methylchrysene 3697-24-3 , R ,
Methyl-2-cyanoacrylate 137-05-3 A
Methylcyclohexane 108-87-2 AO
Methylcyclohexanol 25639-42-3 AO
o-Methylcyclohexanone 583-60-8 AO
2-Methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl, as Mn 12108-13-3 , A
Methyl demeton 8022-00-2 A
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol [see 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol]
4,4'-Methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) (MBOCA) 101-14-4 , , ANRT , ,
1,1-Methylene-bis-(4-cyclohexylisocyanate) 5124-30-1 , A
4,4'-Methylene-bis-(N,N-dimethyl)benzenamine 101-61-1 , , T ,
4,4'-Methylene-bis-(2-methylaniline) R ,
Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) 101-68-8 , ANO , 12.36
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 75-09-2 , , ANO , , , 12.32
4,4-Methylenedianiline and its dihydrochloride ,
101-77-9 and 13552-44-8 , ANRT , , 10.06
Methylene di-phenyl diisocyanate [see Methylene bis-...]
Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK, 2-Butanone) 78-93-3 , , ANO , 9.70
Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide 1338-23-4 , AO
Methyl ethyl ketoxime 96-29-7 I
Methyl formate 107-31-3 , AO
5-Methyl-3-heptanone [see Ethyl amyl ketone] 541-85-5
Methyl hydrazine (mono-) 60-34-4 , , ANO , , 9.70
Methyl iodide (Iodomethane) 74-88-4 , , ANO , ,
Methyl isoamyl ketone 110-12-3 AN
Methyl isobutyl carbinol 108-11-2 AO
Methyl isobutyl ketone (Hexone, Isopropyl acetone) 108-10-1 , , ANO , 9.76

Page 48
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Methyl isocyanate 624-83-9 , , AO ,
Methyl isopropyl ketone 563-80-4 A
Methyl methanesulfonate 66-27-3 R ,
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 , ANO
Methyl methacrylate 80-62-6 , , AO , 3.79
2-Methyl-1-nitroanthraquinone R
N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) 70-25-7 , R ,
N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea R ,
N-Methyl-N-nitrosourethane R ,
Methyl parathion 298-00-0 , , AN
N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone 872-50-4 , , I
Methyl n-propyl ketone 107-87-9 ANO
Methyl silicate 681-84-5 A
a-Methyl styrene 98-83-9 AO
Methylthiouracil 56-04-2 , R ,
Methyltrichlorosilane 75-79-6 , I
Metiram-complex 9006-42-2 , , ,
Metribuzin 21087-64-9 , , A ,
Metronidazole 443-48-1 RT ,
Mevinphos (Phosdrin) 7786-34-7 , , A
Mica, dust 12001-25-2 AO
Michler's Ketone 90-94-8 , , T ,
Mineral fibers A ,
Mineral oils (lubricant, base oils, and derived products) AORT ,
Mirex 2385-85-5 RT , , , ,
Mitomycin C 50-07-7 , R ,
Molybdenum, soluble/insoluble compounds, as Mo 7439-98-7 AO
Monochlorobenzene [see Chlorobenzene]
Monocrotaline R ,
Monocrotophos (Azodrin) 6923-22-4 , A
Morpholine 110-91-8 AO
5-(Morpholinomethyl)-3-[(5-nitrofurfurylidene)amino]- R ,
2-oxazolidinone
Mustard gas 505-60-2 , , RT ,
Nafenopin R
Naled [see Dibrom]
Naphtha (Coal Tar) 8030-30-6 O
Naphtha (VM&P Naptha) 8032-32-4 A
Naphtha (Rubber Solvent) AO
Naphthalene 91-20-3 , , AO , , 8.48
Naphthalene diisocyanate 25551-28-4 N
b-Naphthylamine (2-Naphthylamine) 91-59-8 , , ANORT ,
a-Naphthylthiourea [see ANTU]
Niax-a Catalyst ESN 62765-93-9 N
Nickel, elemental, soluble, and insoluble compounds, as Ni 7440-02-0 , , ANORT , , , 14.96
Nicotine 54-11-5 , AO
Niridazole R ,
Nitrapyrin 1929-82-4 , , A
Nitric acid 7697-37-2 , , ANO
Nitric oxide 10102-43-9 , AO
Nitrilotriacetic acid 139-13-9 , , T ,
5-Nitroacenaphthene R ,
p-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 , , AO
5-Nitro-o-anisidine 99-59-2 , , T ,
Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 , , AO , , 10.45
4-Nitrobiphenyl [see 4-Nitrodiphenyl] 92-93-3

Page 49
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
p-Nitrochlorobenzene [see 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene] 100-00-5
Nitrochloromethane [see Chloropicrin]
4-Nitrodiphenyl (4-nitrobiphenyl) 92-93-3 , , ANO , ,
Nitroethane 79-24-3 AO
Nitrofen 1836-75-5 , , RT , ,
1-[(5-Nitrofurfurylidene)amino]-2-imidazolidinone R ,
N-[4-(5-Nitro-2-furyl)-2-thiazolyl]acetamide R ,
Nitrogen 7727-37-6 A
Nitrogen dioxide 10102-44-0 , ANO 9.67
Nitrogen mustard 51-75-2 , , RT ,
Nitrogen mustard hydrochloride 55-86-7 T ,
Nitrogen trifluoride 7783-54-2 AO
Nitroglycerin (NG) 55-63-0 , , ANO 10.60
Nitromethane 75-52-5 AO
2-Nitronapththalene 581-89-5 N ,
2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 , , ,
4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 , , ,
1-Nitropropane 108-03-2 AO
2-Nitropropane 79-46-9 , , ANORT , , 10.39
N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine 924-16-3 , , RT ,
N-Nitrosodiethanolamine 1116-54-7 , RT ,
N-Nitrosodiethylamine 55-18-5 , , RT ,
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 62-75-9 , , AONRT , , ,
p-Nitrosodiphenylamine 156-10-5 , , T , ,
N-Nitrosodipropylamine (N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine) 621-64-7 , , RT , ,
N-Nitroso-N-ethylurea 759-73-9 , , T ,
N-Nitroso-N-methylurea 684-93-5 , , T , ,
3-(N-Nitrosomethylamino)propionitrile R ,
4-(N-Nitrosomethylamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) 64091-91-4 R ,
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine R ,
N-Nitrosomethylvinylamine 4549-40-0 , , RT ,
N-Nitrosomorpholine 59-89-2 , , RT , ,
N-Nitrosonornicotine 1654-55-8 , , RT ,
N-Nitrosopiperidine 100-75-4 , , RT ,
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine 930-55-2 , RT ,
N-Nitrososarcosine 13256-22-9 RT ,
Nitrotoluene 99-08-1 , AO
Nitrotrichloromethane [see Chloropicrin]
Nitrous oxide 10024-97-2 AN
Nonane 111-84-2 A
Norethisterone 68-22-4 RT ,
Ochratoxin A 303-47-9 ,
Octachloronaphthalene 2234-13-1 , , AO
Octachlorostyrene , ,
Octane 111-65-9 ANO
1-Octanol 111-87-5 I
Oestradiol 50-28-2 R ,
Oestrone 53-16-7 R ,
Oil mist, mineral 8012-95-1 A ,
Organo (alkyl) mercury O
Organotin compounds NO
Osmium tetroxide, as Os 20816-12-0 , , AO
Oxalic acid 144-62-7 AO
Oxychlordane ,
4,4'-Oxydianiline (4,4'-Diaminodiphenyl ether) 101-80-4 , , RT ,
Oxygen difluoride 7783-41-7 AO

Page 50
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Oxymetholone 434-07-1 RT ,
Ozone 10028-15-6 , , AO
PBB [see Polybrominated biphenyls]
PCB [see Chlorodiphenyl]
Panfuran S (containing dihydroxymethylfuratrizine) R ,
Paraffin wax fume 8002-74-2 A
Paraquat-respirable sizes 4685-14-7 A
Paraquat dichloride 1910-42-5 , , AO
Parathion 56-38-2 , , ANO , , ,
Particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPAH)
[see Coal tar pitch volatiles]
Pentaborane 19624-22-7 , AO
Pentachlorobenzene 608-96-5 , , , 13.06
Pentachloroethane 76-01-7 , , N
Pentachloronaphthalene 1321-64-8 AO
Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene) 82-68-8 , , A ,
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) [see also Chlorophenols] 87-86-5 , , AO , , , 14.20
Pentaerythritol 115-77-5 A
Pentaerythritol triacrylate 3524-68-3 I
Pentane 109-66-0 , ANO
2-Pentanone [see Methyl n-propyl ketone] 107-87-9
Perchloroethylene (Tetrachloroethylene) 127-18-4 , , ANO , , 12.30
Perchloromethyl mercaptan 594-42-3 , , AO
Perchloryl fluoride 7616-94-6 AO
Perfluoroisobutylene 382-21-8 A
Perlite 93763-70-3 A
Petroleum Distallates (Naphtha) 8002-05-9 O
Phenacetin 62-44-2 , RT ,
Phenacyl chloride [see a-Chloroacetophenone]
Phenanthrene 85-01-8 , , ,
Phenazopyridine 94-78-0 RT ,
Phenazopyridine hydrochloride 136-40-3 RT ,
Phenobarbitol R ,
Phenol 108-95-2 , , ANO , , 8.45
Phenothiazine 92-84-2 A
Phenoxyacetic acid herbicides R ,
Phenoxybenzamine hydrochloride 63-92-3 RT ,
m-Phenylenediamine (1,3-Phenylenediamine) 108-45-2 , , A
o-Phenylenediamine (1,2-Phenylenediamine) 95-54-5 , , A ,
p-Phenylenediamine 106-50-3 , , AO ,
2,3-o-Phenylene pyrene [see Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene]
Phenyl ether 101-84-8 AO
Phenyl ether-biphenyl mixture, vapor 8004-13-5 O
Phenylethylene [see Styrene, monomer]
Phenyl glycidyl ether (PGE) 122-60-1 ANO ,
Phenylhydrazine 100-63-0 ANO ,
Phenyl mercaptan [see Benzenethiol]
N-Phenyl-b-naphthylamine 135-88-6 AN ,
Phenylphosphine 638-21-1 A
Phenytoin (and sodium salts of) 57-41-0 , , RT ,
Phorate (Thimet) 298-02-2 , A
Phosdrin (Mevinphos) 7786-34-7 , AO
Phosgene (Carbonyl chloride) 75-44-5 , , ANO ,
Phosphamidon 13171-21-6 , O
Phosphine 7803-51-2 , , AO ,
Phosphoric acid 7664-38-2 , , AO

Page 51
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Phosphorus (yellow) 7723-14-0 , , AO ,
Phosphorus oxychloride 10025-87-3 , A
Phosphorus pentachloride 10026-13-8 , AO
Phosphorus pentasulfide 1314-80-3 AO
Phosphorus trichloride 7719-12-2 , AO
Photomirex , ,
Phthalates ,
Phthalic anhydride 85-44-9 , , AO , 6.03
m-Phthalodinitrile 626-17-5 A
Picloram (Tordon) 1918-02-1 , , A
Picolines I
Picric acid (2,4,6-Trinitrophenol) 88-89-1 , , AO
Pindone (2-Pivaloyl-a,3-indandione) 83-26-1 A
Piperazine dihydrochloride 142-64-3 A
Piperidine 110-89-4 , I
Pival (Pindone) 83-26-1 AO
2-Pivalyl-1,3-indandione [see Pival]
Plaster of Paris [see Calcium sulfate] 26499-65-0
Platinum (Metal) 7440-06-4 A
Platinum, soluble salts, as Pt AO
Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB's) 36355-01-8 , RT , ,
Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors) [see also Chlorodiphenyl] 1336-36-3 , , NRT , , 16.92
Polychlorobiphenyls (PCB's) [see Chlorodiphenyls]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , T , ,
Polyethylene glycols 25322-68-3 I
Polypropylene glycols 25322-69-4 I
Polytetrafluoroethylene (TEFLON) decomposition products A
Ponceau MX R ,
Ponceau 3R R ,
Potassium bromate 7758-01-2 , , AIR
Procarbazine 671-16-9 RT ,
Procarbazine hydrochloride 366-70-1 RT ,
Progesterone 57-83-0 RT ,
Progestins R ,
Propane 74-98-6 , AO
1,3-Propane sultone 1120-71-4 , , ART , ,
1-Propanethiol [see n-Propyl mercaptan] 107-03-9
Propargyl alcohol 107-19-7 , , A
b-Propiolactone 57-57-8 , , ANORT , ,
Propionaldehyde 123-38-6 , , ,
Propionic acid 79-09-4 , A
Propoxur [see Baygon] 114-26-1
n-Propyl acetate 109-60-4 AO
Propyl alcohol 71-23-8 AO
Propylene 115-07-1 , , A
Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloro propane) 78-87-5 , , AO , , 12.22
Propylene glycol 57-55-6 I
Propylene glycol dinitrate (PGDN) 6423-43-4 A
Propylene glycol monomethyl ether 107-98-2 A 8.12
Propyleneimine (2-Methylaziridine) 75-55-8 , , AORT , ,
Propylene oxide 75-56-9 , , AORT , , 12.19
n-Propyl mercaptan 107-03-9 NO
n-Propyl nitrate 627-13-4 A
Propylthiouracil 51-52-5 RT ,
Propyne 74-99-7 , AO
Pseudocumene [see 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene]

Page 52
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Pyrene 129-00-0 , , 10.93
Pyrethrins (Pyrethrum) 8003-34-7 , AO
Pyrethroids (synthetic) ,
Pyridine 110-86-1 , , AO 9.23
Pyrocatechol [see Catechol]
Quartz [see Silica-Crystalline]
Quinoline 91-22-5 , , I ,
Quinone 106-51-4 , , AO ,
Qunitobenzene [see Pentachloronitrobenzene]
Radionuclides ,
Radon 10043-92-2 , ,
RDX [see Cyclonite]
Reserpine 50-55-5 , T ,
Resorcinol 108-46-3 , A
Rhodium 7440-16-6 AO
Ronnel 299-84-3 AO
Rosin core solder decomposition products, as resin acids 8050-09-7 A
Rosin core solder pyrolysis products, as Formaldehyde A
Rotenone (Commercial) 83-79-4 AO
Rubber solvent (Naphtha) [see Naphtha-Rubber Solvent]
Saccharin 81-07-2 , , RT ,
Safrole 94-59-7 , , RT ,
Selenium compounds, as Se 7782-49-2 , , AO , , 15.35
Selenium hexafluoride, as Se 7783-79-1 AO
Selenium sulfide 7446-34-6 , T ,
Sesone [see Sodium 2,4-dichlorophenoxyethyl sulfate]
Sevin [see Carbaryl]
Shale oils 68308-34-9 R ,
Silane [see Silicon tetrahydride]
Silica (SiO2) 7631-86-9 ANOR ,
Silica-crystalline (respirable size) 14808-60-7 ,
Silicon 7440-21-3 A
Silicon carbide 409-21-2 A
Silicon tetrahydride 7803-62-5 , A
Silver, metal and soluble compounds, as Ag 7440-22-4 , , AO , 16.12
Soapstone, dust AO
Sodium azide 26628-22-8 , , A
Sodium bisulfite 7631-90-5 , A
Sodium 2,4-dichlorophenoxyethyl sulfate (CRAG, Sesone) 136-78-7 AO
Sodium fluoroacetate 62-74-8 , , AO
Sodium hydroxide 1310-73-2 , AO
Sodium hypochlorite 7681-52-9 , ANO
Sodium metabisulfite 7681-57-4 A
Sodium o-phenylphenate 132-27-4 , , R ,
Sodium perfluoroacetate 62-74-8 , , A
Sodium phosphate, tribasic- [see Trisodium Phosphate]
Soots RT ,
Stearates A
Sterigmatacystin R ,
Stibine 7803-52-3 AO
Stoddard solvent 8052-41-3 ANO
Streptozotocin 18883-66-4 , RT ,
Strontium chromate, as Cr 7789-06-2 , ART ,
Strychnine 57-24-9 , AO
Styrenes , , ,
Styrene, monomer 100-42-5 , , ANO , , 9.63

Page 53
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Styrene oxide 96-09-3 , , R , ,
Subtilisins 1395-21-7 A
Succinonitrile 110-61-2 N
Sulfallate 95-06-7 , T ,
Sulfotep [see TEDP]
Sulfur dioxide 7446-09-5 , ANO 10.11
Sulfur hexafluoride 2551-62-4 AO
Sulfuric acid 7664-93-9 , , ANO 7.10
Sulfur monochloride 10025-67-9 , AO
Sulfur pentafluoride (Dimer) 5714-22-7 AO
Sulfur tetrafluoride 7783-60-0 , A
Sulfuryl fluoride 2699-79-8 , , AO
Sullfallate 95-06-7 , RT ,
Sulprofos 35400-43-2 , , A
Systox (Demeton) 8065-48-3 , AO
2,4,5-T (2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 93-76-5 , AO ,
Talc (non-asbestiform, resp. and fibrous) 14807-96-6 AO
Talc (containing asbestiform fibers) AR ,
Tantalum, metal and oxide 7440-25-7 AO
TEDP (Tetraethyldithionopyrophosphate) 3689-24-5 , AO
Teflon decomposition products A
Tellurium and compounds, as Te 13494-80-9 AO
Tellurium hexafluoride, as Te 7783-80-4 , AO
Temephos 3383-96-8 , , A
Tepp 107-49-3 , AO
Terphthalic acid 100-21-0 A
Terphenyls 26140-60-3 A
1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene , ,
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 , , , 12.52
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) 1746-01-6 , RT , , , , , 21.09
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloro-2,2-difluoroethane (Fluorocarbon 112a) 76-11-9 AO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro-1,2-difluoroethane (Fluorocarbon 112) 76-12-0 AO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 , , ANO , , , 14.04
Tetrachloroethylene [see Perchloroethylene] 127-18-4 , ,
Tetrachloromethane [see Carbon tetrachloride]
Tetrachloronaphthalene 1335-88-2 AO
Tetraethyl lead, as Pb 78-00-2 , AO
Tetraethylene glycol diacrylate 17831-71-9 I
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane I
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 , AO
Tetramethyl lead, as Pb 75-74-1 , AO
Tetramethyl succinonitrile 3333-52-6 ANO
Tetranitromethane 509-14-8 , AO
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate 7722-88-5 A
Tetryl (2,4,6-Trinitrophenylmethylnitramine) 479-45-8 AO
Thallium-soluble compounds, as Tl 7440-28-0 , , AO ,
Thioacetamide 62-55-5 , , T ,
4,4'-Thiobis (6-t butyl-m-cresol) 96-69-5 A
4,4'-Thiodianiline 139-65-1 , , R ,
Thioglycolic acid 68-11-1 A
Thiols (n-alkane monothiols) N
Thionyl chloride 7719-09-7 A
Thiourea 62-56-6 , , RT ,
Thiram 137-26-8 , , AO
Thorium dioxide 1314-20-1 , , T ,
Titanium dioxide 13463-67-7 A

Page 54
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Titanium tetrachloride 7550-45-0 , , ,
o-Tolidine 119-93-7 , , ANRT , ,
o-Tolidine-based dyes N ,
Toluene (methyl benzene) 108-88-3 , , ANO , , 8.64
Toluene 2,4-diamine [see 2,4-Diaminotoluene] 25376-45-8
Toluene diisocyanate (mixed isomers) 26471-62-5 , , T ,
Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) 584-84-9 , , ANOR , 10.88
p-Toluene sulfonyl chloride 98-59-9 I
m-Toluidine 108-44-1 A
o-Toluidine 95-53-4 , , ANORT , ,
p-Toluidine 106-49-0 , A ,
o-Toluidine hydrochloride 636-21-5 , , T ,
Toxaphene [see Chlorinated camphene]
Transnonachlor ,
Tremolite [see Talc, fibrous]
Treosulphan 299-75-2 R ,
Tributyl phosphate 126-73-8 AO
Tributyl tin ,
Trichloroacetic acid 76-03-9 A
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 , , A , , 9.80
1,1,1-Trichloroethane [see Methyl chloroform]
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 , , ANO , , , 13.51
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 , , ANO , , 11.09
Trichlorofluoromethane (Fluorocarbon 11) 75-69-4 , , A
Trichloromethane [see Chloroform]
Trichloronaphthalene (Halowax) 1321-65-9 AO
Trichloronitromethane [see Chloropicrin]
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 , , , ,
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 , , RT , , 11.84
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 , , AO
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Fluorocarbon 113) 76-13-1 , , AO 6.93
Tricyclohexyltin hydroxide (Cyhexatin) 13121-70-5 A
Tridymite [see Silica-Crystalline)
Triethanolamine 102-71-6 A
Triethylamine 121-44-8 , , AO , 9.82
Triethylene glycol diacrylate 1680-21-3 I
Trifluorobromomethane (Fluorocarbon 13B1) 75-63-8 AO
Trifluralin 1582-09-8 , , , ,
Trimellitic anhydride 552-30-7 AN
Trimethylamine 75-50-5 , AI
Trimethylbenzene 25551-13-7 , A 8.16
Trimethyl phosphite 121-45-9 A
Trimethylolpropane triacrylate 15625-89-5 I
Trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate 3290-92-4 I
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 540-84-1 , ,
2,4,6-Trinitrophenol [see Picric acid]
2,4,6-Trinitrophenylmethylnitramine [see Tetryl]
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) 118-96-7 AO ,
Tri-o-cresyl phosphate (TOCP) 78-30-8 AO
Triphenyl amine 603-34-9 A
Triphenyl phosphate 115-86-6 AO
Tripoli 1317-95-9 A
Tris(aziridinyl)-p-benzoquinone (Triaziquone) 68-76-8 , , R ,
Tris(1-aziridinyl)phosphine sulfide (Thiotepa) 52-24-4 RT ,
Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate 126-72-7 , , T ,
Trisodium phosphate (Sodium phosphate, tribasic-) 7601-54-9 , I

Page 55
 Title TRI Air Water Endocrine Bio-
Substance CAS # III Codes Pollutant Pollutant Carcinogen Mimickers accumulative Rating
Trp-P-1 (and its acetate) (3-Amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido- 62450-06-0 R ,
[4,3-b]indole)
Trp-P-2 (and its acetate) (3-Amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido- 62450-07-1 R ,
[4,3-b]indole)
Trypan blue 72-57-1 , , R ,
Tungsten and compounds, as W 7440-33-7 AN
Turpentine 8006-64-2 AO
Uracil mustard 66-75-1 , R ,
Uranium, as U, natural compounds, soluble and insoluble 7440-61-1 AO
Urea 2164-17-2 , , I
Urethane (Ethyl carbamate) 51-79-6 , , RT ,
Valeraldehyde 110-62-3 A
Vanadium, as V2O5, dust and fume 1314-62-1 , , ANO
Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 , , AN , , 8.79
Vinyl benzene [see Styrene]
Vinyl bromide 593-60-2 , , A , ,
Vinyl chloride (Chloroethylene, Chloroethene) 75-01-4 , , ANORT , , , 12.93
Vinyl cyanide [see Acrylonitrile]
4-Vinyl cyclohexene 100-40-3 AI ,
Vinyl cyclohexene dioxide 106-87-6 A ,
Vinyl halides N ,
Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene) 75-35-4 , , A , ,
Vinyl toluene 25013-15-4 AO
VM&P Naphtha [see Naptha (VM&P)] 8032-32-4
Warfarin 81-81-2 , AO
Waste anesthetic gases and vapors N
Welding fumes A
Wood dust; all soft and hard woods AO
Xylene (mixed isomers) 1330-20-7 , , ANO , 8.77
m-Xylene 108-38-3 , , ANO ,
o-Xylene 95-47-6 , , ANO ,
p-Xylene 106-42-3 , , ANO ,
m-Xylene a,a'-diamine 1477-55-0 A
(MXDA, m-m xylenediamine)
2,4-Xylenol [see 2,4-Dimethylphenol]
Xylidine (mixed isomers) 1300-73-8 AO ,
Yttrium, metal and compounds, as Y 7440-65-5 A
Zinc 7440-66-6 , , , 14.03
Zinc chloride 7646-85-7 , AO
Zinc chromate, as Cr 13530-65-9 ART ,
Zinc chromate, as Cr 11103-86-9 ART ,
Zinc chromate, as Cr 37300-23-7 ART ,
Zinc oxide, fume and dust 1314-13-2 ANO
Zinc stearate 557-05-1 A
Zineb 12122-67-7 , , ,
Ziram 137-30-4 , ,
Zirconium compounds, as Zr 7440-67-2 AO

Page 56
 Product Manufacture - Materials Choice
Plastics Environmental Risk Information (figure 5)
The following chart and graph
provide information about the
relative environmental risk of the
production of these types of
plastic resins. This information Relative Environmental Impact Ranking of Plastic Resins
is useful for determining the (higher risk indicator = greater environmental impact)
relative risk between using these
Environmental Risk
plastics as a material in a Plastic Resin Types Indicator Number
manufactured product. One
method to rank environmental Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) 15.23
risk is by comparing fuel,
materials use and emissions as Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) 10.38
shown in the charts below.
Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) 8.60

High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) 7.83

Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) 5.59

Polypropylene (PP) 5.37

p p
Report 10: Polymer Conversion. (Brussels, May 1997). Ranking is based on
the ratios of comparative fuel, materials use and emissions that result from
production of resins.

Relative Environmental Risk of Plastic Resin Types

16.00
Environmental Risk Indicator Number

14.00

12.00
Risk
Number

10.00
Environmental

8.00
Indicator

6.00

4.00

2.00

0.00
Low Density
High Density
Terephthalate

Polystyrene (EPS)

Polypropylene
Polyethylene

Polyethylene
Polyvinyl Chloride

Polyethylene

(HDPE)

(LDPE)
Expanded
(PET)

(PP)
(PVC)

Plastic Resin Types

Page 57
 Product Manufacture — Materials Choice
(figure 6)

Recycling Rates of Materials

90

80

70
Percent of Material Recycled

60

50

40

30

20

10

PVC Plastic

LDPE/LLPE Plastic
Platinum

Magnesium Metal

Tin

PP Plastic
Silver

Copper

Titanium

Lead

Aluminum

HDPE Plastic

PS Plastic
Nickel

Zinc

Iron & Steel

PET Plastic
Gold

Type of Material

Sources: U.S. Geological Survey. 1997.

Raw Material Commodity Prices Available on-line at htttp://
[Link]/minerals/pubs/
500 commodity.
1996 National Post-Consumer Plastics
Rigid Container Recycling Rate Study.
450
1997. R.W. Beck Inc.

400 Note: All recycling rates are 1997 rates,

except for plastic materials which are
1996 rates. The recycling rates are the
350 amount of material recycled per
total amount consumed in the United
States in 1997. Plastic recycling rates
Price in cents per pound

300
include bottles, tubs/containers, film
and miscellaneous packaging
250 recycling rates for polycarbonate,
ABS, nylon, plastic coded #7 and non-
packaging plastics were not available
200
in the American Plastics Council data.
However, 64.7 million pounds of these
150
types of plastics were recorded as
being recycled in 1996.

100

50

0
Magnesium

Nickel
Zinc

Tin

Titanium

Copper

Silver

Lead

Aluminum

Iron/Steel

Type of Material

Page 58
 Climate Altering Chemical Index
Ozone-Depleting and Global Warming Gases
The Earth’s atmosphere has
a naturally occurring shield
of “global warming gases” Ozone Global-
including water vapor, Chemical Depletion Warming
carbon dioxide, methane, Designation Formula Potential Potential
and nitrous oxide which
traps radiant heat and keeps Class I Ozone Depletion and Global Warming Chemicals
the planet in a comfortable,
livable temperature range. CFC-11 CCl3F 1 3,400
Since the pre-industrial era CFC-12 CCl2F2 0.89 7,100
atmospheric concentrations
CFC-13 CClF3 13,000
of carbon dioxide have
CFC-111 C2FCl5
increased 30 percent and
CFC-112 C2F2Cl4
methane concentrations have
more than doubled. There is CFC-113 C2F3Cl3 0.81 4,500
a growing concensus by CFC-114 C2F4Cl2 0.69 7,000
international scientists that CFC-115 C2F5Cl 0.32 7,000
the buildup of global CFC-211 C3FCl7
warming gases which CFC-212 C3F2Cl6
include carbon dioxide, CFC-213 C3F3Cl5
methane, nitrous oxide and CFC-214 C3F4Cl4
perfluorocarbons can lead CFC-215 C3F5Cl3
to major environmental
CFC-216 C3F6Cl2
changes. Below are listings
CFC-217 C3F7Cl
of chemical formulations
Halon-1211 CF2ClBr 2.2-3.5
that can contribute to the
formation of these Halon-1301 CF3Br 8-16 4,900
greenhouse gases and to Halon-2402 C2F4Br2 5-6.2
ozone depletion. Carbon tetrachloride CCl4 1.13 1,300
Methyl chloroform CH3CCl3 0.14
Methyl bromide CH3Br
Methyl chloride CH3Cl
HBFC’s Several
Nitrous oxide N 2O 270

Global Warming (non-Ozone-Depleting) Chemicals

Carbon dioxide CO2 0 1

Methane CH4 0 11
HFC-125 CHF2CF3 90
HFC-134a CFH2CF3 1,000
HFC-152a CH3CHF2 2,400
Perfluorobutane C4F10 0 5,500
Prefluoropentane C5F12 0 5,500
Perfluorohexane C6F14 0 5,100
Perfluorotributylamine N(C4F9)3 0 4,300

Page 59
 Ozone Global-
Chemical Depletion Warming
Designation Formula Potential Potential

Class II Ozone Depletion and Global Warming Chemicals

HCFC-21 CHFCl2 0.010

HCFC-22 CHF2Cl 0.048 1,600
HCFC-31 CH2ClF 0.010
HCFC-121 C2HFCl4 0.004
HCFC-122 C2HF2Cl3 0.004
HCFC-123 C2HF3Cl2 0.017 90
HCFC-124 C2HF4Cl 0.019 440
HCFC-125 C2HF5 0.000 3,400
HCFC-131 C2H2FCl3 <0.001
HCFC-132 C2H2F2Cl2 0.002
HCFC-133 C2H2F3Cl 0.070
HCFC-141b C2H3FCl2 0.090 580
HCFC-142b C2H3F2Cl 0.054 1,800
HCFC-221 C3HFCl6
HCFC-222 C3HF2Cl5
HCFC-223 C3HF3Cl4
HCFC-224 C3HF4Cl3
HCFC-225 C3HF5Cl2
HCFC-226 C3HF6Cl
HCFC-231 C3H2FCl5
HCFC-232 C3H2F2Cl4
HCFC-233 C3H2F3Cl3
HCFC-234 C3H2F4Cl2
HCFC-235 C3H2F5Cl
HCFC-241 C3H3FCl4
HCFC-242 C3H3F2Cl3
HCFC-243 C3H3F3Cl2
HCFC-244 C3H3F4Cl
HCFC-251
HCFC-252
HCFC-253
HCFC-261
HCFC-262
HCFC-271 C3H4FCl3
C3H4F2Cl2
C3H4F3Cl
C3H5FCl2
C3H5F2Cl
C3H6FCl

Source: Graedel, T.E. and B.R. Allenby. Industrial Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995. Copyright AT&T.

Page 60
Polymers
Manufacture
Generally, the manufacture of synthetic polymers generates hazardous
pollutants. Many additives, particularly heavy metals, pose serious
environmental risks. Degradable polymers, such as lactic acid or starch-
based materials, are a viable alternative to synthetic plastics and may
virtually eliminate the generation of hazardous pollutants. See “Degradable
Polymers”(page 63) for more information on this type of plastics.

Disposal
Many plastics, or polymers, generate hazardous materials upon
incineration. Particularly troublesome are the polymers with halogenated
(chlorinated, bromated, etc.) additives, such as those that make the
polymer fire-retardant. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is also known to
produce hazardous pollutants due to the chlorinated products generated
during incineration.

On the other hand, materials such as polypropylene (PP), polyethylene

(PE), polyurethanes (PU), polyethyleneterephthalate (PET), and high-
density polyethylene (HDPE) burn relatively “cleanly” provided that
they have no halogenated additives. Examples of relatively benign
plastic products include milk jugs (PE) and pop bottles (PET).

Recycling
In general, the fewer additives a plastic contains, the easier it will be to
combine with other similar plastics and recycle. Similarly, the fewer
different plastics that are combined within a particularly product, the
easier it will be to reuse the constituent materials.

Many companies have greatly increased their ability to recycle plastic

components of their products by using only one or two types of plastics
within a given module. For instance, Volkswagen has reduced the
number of plastics in its bumper assembly, making the assembly
relatively easy to separate from the car and recycle.

Degradable Polymers
A degradable material is one that is reduced by biodegradation,
photodegradation, or chemodegradation to carbon dioxide, water and
minerals, leaving no environmentally harmful residues. Biodegradation is
the process whereby microbes metabolize the polymer into harmless
products. Photodegradation is the process whereby the polymer chains
are broken through the action of ultraviolet light (generally sunlight).
Chemodegradation process whereby polymers are broken into harmless
materials through chemical treatments.

Generally, the smaller the polymer chain (and thus a smaller molecular
weight), the more easily biodegraded a polymer is. In many cases, the long
polymer chains are broken up by photodegradation, and the actual
transformation of the polymer “links” is further accomplished by microbes.

Page 61
Vendors of Degradable Polymers
Last updated October 2003

Manufacturer Material Application Contact Information

Archer Daniels Midland Company Phone: 1-800-637-5843
Manufacturer of starch
4666 Faries Parkway raw material info@[Link]
especially made for plastics use
Decatur, IL 62526 [Link]

St. Lawrence Starch Company Manufacturer of starch phone: (952) 742-7575

raw material
(division of Cargill) especially made for plastics use [Link]/

Epron Industries
phone: +44(0)1780 721697
Units 4-6 Ketton Business Estate Manufacturer of starch
raw material enquiries@[Link]
Pit Lane especially made for plastics use
[Link]
Ketton, Stamford, Lincs PE9 Switzerland

National Starch and Chemical Co.

phone: 1-800-797-4992
American Excelsior Group (USA) Manufacturer of starch
raw material [Link]
10 Fiderne Avenue especially made for plastics use
nscinquiry@[Link]
Bridgewater, NJ 08807

Amylum
Tate & Lyle PLC
Manufacturer of starch phone: +44 (0) 7626 6525
Lower Thames Street raw material
especially made for plastics use [Link]
London EC3R 6DQ
United Kingdom

Suedstaerke
GMBH Manufacturer of starch phone: +49 8252 913-0
raw material
Postfach 1240 especially made for plastics use [Link]
Schrobenhauser 86522

Novamont S.p.A.
Supplies starch-based polymers
Via Fauser 8, I-28100 raw material [Link]@[Link]
under the trade name Mater- Bi
Novara, Italy
Corn starch, the primary ingrediant of
Plantic Technologies, Inc. Plantic (trademark) is from Australian-
Unit 3 Angliss Park Estate grown, non-genetically modified corn. biodegradable consumer phone: +61 3 9353 7900
227-231 Fitgerald Road According to the manufacturer it is products and raw material [Link]/[Link]
Laverton North, Victoria, Australia 3026 completely biodegradable and non-toxic to
humans and the environment.
 Manufacturer Material Application Contact Information
extrudable, fully
Cargill Polylactides and copolymers
degradable (can be phone: (952) 742-7575
15407 McGinty Rd West Eco-Pla product line (lactic
composted) no retooling [Link]
Wazata, MN 55391 acid base)
of process required

UBC Films, Inc. Produces cellulose film made from wood

biodegradable consumer phone: (770) 437-5720
1950 Lake Park Drive pulp. The product is marketed under the
products and raw material [Link]/
Smyrna, GA 30080 names Cellophane and NatureFlex.

Produces a wide range of biodegradable

Biocorp
products made from corn and potato biodegradable consumer phone: (310) 491-3465
5155 West Rosecrans Ave. Suite 1116
starch including cups, straws, plates, soup products [Link]
Los Angeles, CA 90250
and salad containers, lawn/leaf bags, etc.

Produces a compostable composite made

EarthShell Corporation biodegradable consumer phone: (410) 847-9420
from a blend of limestone, potato starch
Santa Barbara, California products [Link]
and recycled paper fiber

Dr. Bhima Vijayendran

Batelle AgriFood Research into biodegradable Dir. Of Technology Development
provides research
Columbus, Ohio packaging technology phone: (614) 424-5741
vijayenb@[Link]
Sample Letter to Parts/
Materials Suppliers
(Company Name)
(Company Address)

Dear Supplier:

To adequately assess the environmental performance of our products

we need information about materials and parts coming into our facility.
This information will be used for an internal evaluation of the
environmental impacts of our products. We are asking that you fill out
the following survey questions and return to:

Contact Name
(your company address)
fax number/e-mail

Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.

Raw Materials/Parts Supplier Environmental Survey

1) Does your company have an Environmental

Management System (EMS) in place?
____Yes _____No

2) Is there a formal energy conservation program or

practices in place at your company?

____Yes _____No

3) Does your company have ISO 9000 or ISO 14000

certification or does your company regularly publish an
environmental report?
____Yes _____No

4) Is water conservation advocated and practiced at your

company?
____Yes _____No

5) Does your company have a formal program to minimize

hazardous air emissions?
____Yes _____No

Page 65
Additional Resources
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website has information about
EPA design for the environment initiatives, information products, links to
related websites and opportunities to order publications. The website
address is: [Link]/dfe.

Department of Energy (DOE) Motor Challenge Program Clearinghouse can

answer questions about using energy-efficient electric motor systems. Call them
on their hotline at 800/862-2086 or access their homepage at [Link].

Industrial Ecology. 1995. T.E. Graedel and B.R. Allenby. Prentice Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey. Copyright AT&T. This work by Drs. Graedel and Allenby,
leaders in the field of industrial ecology, links industrial ecology with
environmental science. It presents the matrix system upon which this toolkit is
based, as well as supporting materials and Design for Environment processes.

Implementing Design for Environment: A Primer. Digital Equipment Corporation

and Massachusetts Institute of Technology Program on Technology, Business &
Environment. Digital Corporation, 1997. Available on-line: [Link]
ctipid/www/tbe/ Provides manufacturers with an overall strategy for
implementing Design for Environment within the company.

“Applying the DFE Toolkit to an Electronic Switch.” T.E. Graedel, G.C. Munie,
B.K. Stolte, and G.C. Wightman. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International
Symposium on Electronics and the Environment; May 6-8, 1996. Piscataway, NJ:
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 1996. 148-153. Provides an
example of using a Design for Environment process, similar to the one presented
in this toolkit, in the development of an electronic switch for AT&T.

Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Annual

Symposiums on Electronics and the Environment. Held every year in May, the
papers presented in this conference provide updates on current trends in DfE in
the electronics field, examples of DfE implementation, and new resources
available for DfE. Copies are available from the IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes
Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854-4150.

Reusable Transport Packaging Directory This directory explains how to

establish reusable transport system in your company and lists companies that sell
reusable containers. It is available from the Minnesota Office of Environmental
Assistance Clearinghouse at 651/215-0232 or 1-800/657-3843. This directory is also
available on the OEA website at [Link].

Recycling Information
Minnesota Recycling Directory. Published by the Minnesota of Environmental
Assistance, this publication provides information on statewide recycling
markets and collection locations. It includes a listing of buyers and sellers of
recyclable materials. This publication can be obtained by contacting the MOEA
at 651/296-3417 or 800/657-3843.

American Metal Market. Publishes daily price quotes for several secondary
ingot alloys. To order, call 212/887-8551.

Page 66
Waste Age’s Recycling Times. This journal of recycling markets is published bi-
weekly. Each issue provides an update on market prices for secondary materials
including prices paid by processors and end-users. The journal also tracks and
analyzes trends in the waste management area. The journal can be ordered by
contacting Recycling Times, P.O. Box 420168, Palm Coast, FL, 32142-0168. 800/
829-5443.

Recycler’s World - [Link]

“A worldwide trading site for information related to secondary or recyclable
commodities, by-products, used and surplus items or materials.” This web site
provides information on numerous recyclable commodity markets and includes a
worldwide materials exchange program where manufacturers can post materials
available or view materials available. Commodity sections include automotive,
metal, glass, textile, food, building materials and other recyclable material
markets.

Agencies/Organizations
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Department of Engineering Professional Development
432 North Lake Street
Madison, Wisconsin 53791-8897
Phone: 608/263-7429
Web site:[Link]
The department sponsors several seminars and classes throughout the year,
educating design professionals in environmental issues and design. The
department has developed company specific DfE course work and curriculum.

Minnesota Technical Assistance Program

1313 5th Street S.E., Ste. 207
Minneapolis, MN 55414-4504
Metro area: 612/627-4646
Greater Minnesota : (toll-free) 800/247-0015
Web site: [Link]/mntap
Assists businesses and manufacturers in preventing pollution and developing
environmentally responsible manufacturing processes. MnTAP also directs the
Minnesota Materials Exchange Program (MMX), allowing Minnesota
manufacturers to post and view available materials in the annual MMX catalog.
MnTAP has numerous free resources available to manufacturers, including
telephone assistance, site visits by MnTAP engineers, the student intern program,
seminars and workshops, and general information on alternative technology and
practices.

Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance

520 Lafayette Road North
Second Floor
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-4100
Phone: 651/296-3417 or (toll-free) 800/657-3843
Web site: [Link] The MOEA assists businesses with solid waste
issues, as well as publishes/provides several printed resources. The MOEA
administers grants to companies for developing pollution prevention and waste
management technologies.

Page 67
Works Cited
1. Graedel, T.E. and B.R. Allenby. Industrial Ecology. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995. Copyright AT&T.

2. Eagan, Patrick D. and L. Weinberg. “Development of a Streamlined,

Life-cycle, Design for the Environment (DfE) Tool for Manufacturing
Process Modification: A Boeing Defense and Space Group Case Study.”
1997. International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment.
Conference Record, San Francisco, California, May 5-7. pp. 188-191.

3. Hoffman, W. “Design for Environment at Motorola.” Design for the

Environment: Managing for the Future. Proceedings of 10th Forum of the
Environmental Management Excellence Program, Feb. 14, 1997.

4. Eagan, Patrick D., and W. Pferdehirt. “Expanding the Benefits of

Environmental Management Systems Through Design for Environment.”
Submitted for publication.

5. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Green Products by

Design: Choices for a Cleaner Environment, OTA-E-541 (Washington, DC:
U.S. Government Printing Office, October 1992).

6. Graedel, T.E.; G.C. Munie, B.K. Stolte, and G.C. Wightman. 1996.
“Applying the DfE Toolkit to an Electronic Switch.” Proceedings of the
1996 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment.
Conference Record, Dallas, Texas, May 6-8. pp. 148-153.

7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Draft for Public Comment,

Environmentally Preferable Products Guideline. Federal Register, 29 Sept. 1995.

8. Digital Equipment Corporation and Massachusetts Institute of

Technology Program on Technology, Business & Environment.
Implementing Design for Environment: A Primer. Digital Corporation,
1997. Available on-line: [Link]

9. Weinberg, L. and P. Eagan. “Introducing Design for the Environment in a

Firm through the Application of Abridged Life-Cycle Analysis.”
Environmental Quality Management. Fall 1997.

10. Eagan, Patrick D., J. Koning, and W. Hoffman. “Developing an

Environmental Education Program Case Study: Motorola.” 1994.
International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. Conference
Record, San Francisco, California, May 2-4. pp. 41-44.

11. Eagan, Patrick, “Applying a Matrixed Approach to Abridged Life-Cycle

Assessment: A Class Exercise with an AT&T Matrix.” Design for the
Environment: Managing for the Future. Proceedings of 10th Forum of the
Environmental Management Excellence Program, Feb. 14, 1997.

12. Eco-Profiles. Association of Plastic Manufacturers in Europe (APME).

Brussels, Belguim. May 1997.

13. Department of Labor and Industry, Occupational Safety and Health

Parts 5206.0100-5206.0400

Page 68
Summary of
References
“Biodegradable Plastics.” Materials & Design 13 (1992): 299-304.

Chapman, G.M. and J.D. Cox. “The State of Biodegradable Plastics and Their
Impact on the Environment.” Popular Plastics and Packaging (October 1994):
47-50.

Clark, Wilson. Energy for Survival: The Alternative to Extinction. Garden

City, NY: Anchor Books, 1974.

Colborn, Theo; Frederick S. vom Saal, and Ana M. Soto. “Developmental

Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Wildlife and Humans.”
Environmental Health Perspectives. September 1993: 378-379.

Department of Health and Human Services. 7th Annual Report on Carcinogens.

National Toxicology Program. On-line. Internet. April 1, 1997. Available: http://
[Link]/htdocs/ARC/[Link] and [Link]
[Link]/htdocs/ARC/known-carcinogen_list.html

Department of Labor and Industry, Occupational Safety and Health Standards.

“Employee Right-to-know Standards.” Parts 5206.0100-5206.0400

Digital Equipment Corporation and Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Program on Technology, Business & Environment. Implementing Design for
Environment: A Primer. Digital Corporation, 1997. Available on-line: http://
[Link]/ctipid/www/tbe/

Eagan, Patrick, “Applying a Matrixed Approach to Abridged Life-Cycle

Assessment: A Class Exercise with an AT&T Matrix.” Design for the
Environment: Managing for the Future. Proceedings of 10th Forum of the
Environmental Management Excellence Program, Feb. 14, 1997.

Eagan, Patrick D., J. Koning, and W. Hoffman. “Developing an Environmental

Education Program Case Study: Motorola.” 1994. International Symposium on
Electronics and the Environment. Conference Record, San Francisco,
California, May 2-4. pp. 41-44.

Eagan, Patrick D., and W. Pferdehirt. “Expanding the Benefits of Environmental

Management Systems Through Design for Environment.” Publication in progress.

Eagan, Patrick D. and L. Weinberg. “Development of a Streamlined, Life-cycle,

Design for the Environment (DfE) Tool for Manufacturing Process
Modification: A Boeing Defense and Space Group Case Study.” 1997.
International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. Conference
Record, San Francisco, California, May 5-7. pp. 188-191.

Environmental Protection Agency. Draft for Comment. Federal Register 60 (29

Sept. 1995): 50733-50734.

Environmental Protection Agency. “Final Water Quality Guidance for the Great
Lakes System; Final Rule.” 40 CFR 9, 122, 123, 131, and 132. Federal Register 60
(23 March 1995): 15393.

Page 69
Graedel, T.E. and B.R. Allenby. Industrial Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995. Copyright AT&T.

Graedel, T.E.; G.C. Munie, B.K. Stolte, and G.C. Wightman. 1996. “Applying the
DfE Toolkit to an Electronic Switch.” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International
Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. Conference Record, Dallas,
Texas, May 6-8. pp.148-153.

Hoffman, Bill. “Design for Environment at Motorola.” Design for the

Environment: Managing for the Future. Proceedings of 10th Forum of the
Environmental Management Excellence Program, Feb. 14, 1997.

Hoffman, Bill. Motorola. Letter to the author. Aug. 8, 1997. International

Symposium on Electronics & the Environment.

IBM & the Environment. International Business Machines Corporate

Environmental Affairs, Somers New York. 1997. [Link]
Environment/.

1998 International Symposium on Electronics & the Environment Conference

Record. ISBN 0-7803-4295-X. May, 1998. Available from the IEEE Service Center.

Jopski, T. “Biodegradable Plastics.” Translated from Kunststoffe German Plastics

10 (1993): 17-20.

McKinley, M.; United States Geological Survey. Letter to the author. Aug. 8, 1997.

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. “Air Quality Permit Rules.” Fact sheet.
January, 1996. Available from the MPCA.

National Research Council. Improving Engineering Design: Designing for

Competitive Advantage. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1991.

Pratt, G.C., P.E. Gerbec, S.K. Livingston, F. Oliaei, G.L. Bollweg, S. Paterson, and D.
Mackay. “An Indexing System for Comparing Toxic Air Pollutants Based Upon
Their Potential Environmental Impacts.” Chemosphere 27 (1993): 1359-1379.

Pratt, G.C.; Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Update on indexing system

provided to author. July 3, 1997.

Rigley, Heidi. “The Markets Page.” Waste Age’s Recycling Times June 23, 1997: 8-9.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Green Products by Design:

Choices for a Cleaner Environment, OTA-E-541 (Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office, October 1992).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Draft for Public Comment,

Environmentally Preferable Products Guideline. Federal Register, Sept. 29, 1995.

United States Geological Survey. “Mineral Industry Surveys.” On-line. Internet.

August 11, 1997. Available: [Link]

Weinberg, L. and P. Eagan. “Introducing Design for the Environment in a Firm

through the Application of Abridged Life-Cycle Analysis.” Publication in
progress.

Page 70