Two Liquid States: The Frenkel Line
Two Liquid States: The Frenkel Line
I. INTRODUCTION We begin our discussion with the paper of Frenkel [1], who
provided a microscopic description of Maxwell phenomeno-
Our current understanding and discussion of basic states of
logical viscoelastic theory of liquid flow [2] by introducing
matter such as solid, liquid, and gas is illustrated by “tempera-
liquid relaxation time τ : τ is the average time between two
ture, pressure” (T ,P ) or “temperature, density” (T ,ρ) phase di-
consecutive atomic jumps in a liquid at one point in space.
agrams. Crossing a line on such diagrams corresponds to ther-
Each jump can approximately be viewed as a jump of an atom
modynamic phase transitions, leading to qualitative changes in
from its neighboring cage into a new equilibrium position with
the physical behavior of the system. Below, we show that, for
subsequent cage relaxation. These atomic jumps give a liquid
one basic state of matter, the liquid phase, an equally important
its ability to flow. The relaxation time τ is a fundamental
qualitative change in system behavior exists, which is related
flow property of a liquid, and it defines liquid viscosity η and
to the change in its dynamics rather than thermodynamics.
diffusion coefficient D.
Consequently, we propose that all liquids have two qualita-
The above picture implies that the motion of an atom in a
tively different states, and that a new additional crossover line
liquid consists of two types: quasiharmonic vibrational motion
(narrow zone) should be added to the phase diagram which
around an equilibrium position as in a solid and diffusive
separates the two states. This line does not correspond to any
motion between two neighboring positions where typical
thermodynamic phase transition, i.e., it is a crossover, and
diffusion distances exceed vibrational distances by about a
there is no discontinuity of any physical properties along the
factor of 5–10 [ Figs. 2(a)–2(c)]. Therefore, atomic motion
line. We called it the “Frenkel line” as discussed below.
in a liquid combines both elements of the short-amplitude
More specifically, a typical (T ,P ) diagram [Fig. 1(a)]
vibrational motion as in a solid and the large-amplitude
implies that a liquid is separated from a gas by the boiling
ballistic-collisional motion as in a gas. One should mention
line ending at the critical point. The diagram further implies
that Frenkel’s ideas were discussed and used for the past 20
that only one single state (frequently called “supercritical
years by Wallace [3] and Chisolm and Wallace [4] to calculate
fluid”) exists for all pressures and temperatures above the
the thermodynamic and dynamic properties of a liquid.
critical point. On the other hand, we propose that an important
In this paper, we propose that the point at which the solid-
qualitative change in a fluid behavior takes place on crossing
like oscillatory motion ceases, leaving only the gaslike motion,
our new line. Importantly, this dynamical crossover line
marks the change in the most important properties of a fluid.
extends for arbitrary values of pressure and temperature above
the critical point [Fig. 1(a)]. In addition, the new line is not
related to the critical point from the physical perspective and,
therefore, exists in systems where the liquid-gas transition is II. THE FRENKEL LINE ON THE PHASE DIAGRAM
absent altogether as is the case in some soft-matter subjects The value of τ decreases with temperature increase,
with short-range attractive forces as well as in the model spanning many orders of magnitude. On the other hand, the
soft-sphere system [Fig. 1(b)]. minimal (Debye) vibration period, τ0 (τ0 ≈ 0.1–1 ps), is weakly
temperature dependent and is mostly defined by interactions
in a given system. At certain high temperatures, the solidlike
*
brazhkin@[Link] vibration character ceases [Figs. 2(a), 2(d), and 2(e)]. This
(a) 40
Nonrigid liquid ρ =1, T=1.325 ρ =2, T=70
ρ =0.5, T=4.5 ρ =1, T=100 (a)
Dynamic line 30
Temperature
Critical
Rigid liquid 20
Displacement
point
Tm
Gas
10
Solid 4
Triple
point
2
Pressure
(b) 0
Nonrigid liquid -2
Dynamic line
Temperature
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Rigid liquid Time
Tm -1.4
ρ =1, T=1.325 3.5 ρ =2, T=70
-1.6
Solid
-1.8
3.0
Pressure Displacement -2.0
-2.2
(b) (c)
FIG. 1. (Color online) Pressure-temperature phase diagrams (in
arbitrary units) of (a) an ordinary substance and (b) a system without 2 3 4 5 11.2 11.6
the boiling line and liquid-gas critical point. In both cases, there exists 20
a dynamic line separating rigid and nonrigid liquids. ρ =0.5, T=4.5 ρ =1, T=100
8 18
031203-2
TWO LIQUID STATES OF MATTER: A DYNAMIC LINE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
therefore, to the loss of shear resistance, or rigidity, at all is defined from the dispersion relation ω = Vs k. Using linear
frequencies existing in the system. Debye approximation and taking maximum frequency ω as
We note that the condition of the crossover (1) and Debye frequency ω0 = 2π /τ0 and kmax = π /a gives Vs =
other conditions considered below correspond to approximate 2a/τ0 . Let us now approach the fluid from high temperatures
equality. Moreover, there are wide distributions of the τ and τ0 where the oscillatory motion is lost and recall that τ is the
values, and we consider their average values. Nevertheless, in time between two consecutive collisions over distance a. Then,
all liquids, there are definite T ,P conditions corresponding to Vth ≈ a/τ , where Vth is the particle thermal velocity. Therefore,
the loss of transverselike vibrations in the excitation spectra, condition (1) implies
hence, we can speak about the definite line or, at least, about
Vs ≈ 2Vth . (3)
the narrow crossover instead of a wide crossover.
Usually, the sharp transition in the macroscopic system In condensed phases, such as solids and liquids, the speed
is associated with some divergent value. The condition (1) of sound is primarily determined by the interactions between
defines the crossover in the dynamics of a system. To propose atoms: The sound velocities are given by elastic moduli. In
a more or less strict criterion of the transition, one can dense liquids, moduli vary insignificantly with temperature
consider the analogy with percolation. Let us consider the along isochors [12], and sound velocities are weakly temper-
high-temperature state of a fluid. If, for time τ , the projection ature dependent. On the other hand, the thermal velocity of
of the particle momentum on its total displacement changes a classical particle increases with temperature without bound.
sign at least once, then this particle is considered an oscillating Therefore, a temperature range must exist where the speed of
one. A small fraction of these particles will be present sound and thermal velocity become comparable in magnitude.
even in the low-density gas state. The proportion of such The physical meaning of condition (3) is that particles cease
particles increases with the temperature decrease, and at a to feel elastic resistance of the medium and start moving in a
certain temperature, the infinite percolation cluster consisting ballistic way.
of these particles appears. We can assume that this temperature The condition for thermal velocity of the particles becoming
corresponds to the appearance of the first high-frequency half the speed of sound as a condition for the change in atomic
transverse-like excitations in the fluid. Of course, depending dynamics is quite natural. The factor of 2 arises from the fact
on the shape of the distributions of the τ and τ0 values, that the neighboring particles move in opposite phases at the
this percolation occurs at τ ≈ τ0 where the proportionality highest frequency, and their relative thermal velocity equals
coefficient can differ from 1 by a dozen percent. the speed of sound.
The ability of liquids to flow is often associated with The speed of sound in the nonrigid liquid is defined by
zero rigidity, or shear resistance, that markedly distinguishes thermal velocity, such as in a gas, and this speed should
liquids from solids. However, this implies zero rigidity at increase with the temperature on isobars. On the other hand, the
low frequencies only, whereas, at higher frequencies, a liquid speed of sound in the rigid liquid decreases with temperature
supports shear stress. On the other hand, condition (1) marks due to the decrease in the bulk modulus on isobars. Thus, on
the qualitative change, from the physical point of view, in isobars near the line defined by the conditions (1) and (3), the
system elastic properties: shear resistance is lost completely at qualitative change in the temperature dependence of the sound
all frequencies available in the liquid. Therefore, condition (1) velocity should take place.
marks the crossover between a “rigid” liquid where rigidity We note that Eq. (3) is based on the same physical
exists in a certain frequency range and a “nonrigid” liquid grounds as Eq. (2). Indeed, the speed of sound is governed
which cannot sustain rigidity at any frequency. by the elastic moduli, which are, in turn, proportional to the
The crossover (1) has important implications for the ability potential energy of the system per unit volume. However,
of liquids to undergo phase transitions, an emerging and the proportionality coefficient in Eq. (2) may be significantly
fast-developing area of research [9–11]. When τ > τ0 at (several times) different from 1. Indeed, the elastic moduli
low temperatures, local structure or definite short-range order are the second derivatives of the potential energy, i.e., the
structure (SROS) of the liquid remains unchanged during times nature of the interparticle interaction is very important for the
shorter than τ . In this case, pressure and temperature changes proportionality coefficient. For example, in Ref. [13], it was
can induce a phase transition in a liquid, accompanied by shown that a van der Waals fluid near the critical point holds
the change in the SROS and dynamics. On the other hand, kB T ≈ Epot , while a Coulomb plasma with a compensating
when τ < τ0 at high temperatures, only the random packing background near the critical point holds 3kB T ≈ Epot .
structure type can exist because atoms are in the continuous Another interesting consequence of Eq. (1) is related
gaslike state of motion. In this case, pressure can only induce to the phenomenon of “high-frequency sound” or positive
a change in density but not a phase transition with a change in dispersion of sound velocity, which is the increase in the
SROS. Therefore, the Frenkel line demarcates the regions on speed of sound at high frequencies. Frenkel predicted [1]
the phase diagram where phase transitions in a liquid operate. that this effect should exist for frequencies ω > 2π /τ . If,
as he argued, shear waves kick in at frequency 2π /τ , the
speed of sound increases from (B/ρ)1/2 to [(B + 4G/3)/ρ]1/2 ,
IV. DYNAMICS AND SOUND PROPAGATION
where B is the bulk modulus and G is the shear modulus of
The qualitative change in atomic dynamics, defined by a liquid because G becomes nonzero at this frequency. For
Eq. (1), has important consequences for sound propagation and viscous liquids, such behavior has been indeed observed many
diffusion. Let us approach the liquid from low temperatures times in the past 50 years (see, for example, Ref. [8]). The
where τ > τ0 . The speed of sound in a liquid or a solid Vs viscoelastic model was later developed in detail, including
031203-3
BRAZHKIN, FOMIN, LYAPIN, RYZHOV, AND TRACHENKO PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
031203-4
TWO LIQUID STATES OF MATTER: A DYNAMIC LINE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
T/Tc
c =2k
atom is V =2V
3 Solid
E τ0 1
= kB T 3 − . (6)
N τ
0.1 1 10
P/Pc 100 1000 10 000
According to Eq. (6), when τ considerably exceeds τ0 at Calculation
low temperatures, liquid energy is close to 3kB T per atom, T Critical
isochore
giving the Dulong-Petit value of specific heat of 3kB . When ρ =ρ (b) II
τ =τ
τ approaches τ0 at high temperatures, liquid energy becomes
T/Tc
10 Experiment
2kB T per atom, giving the specific heat of 2kB , consistent with Ne, D=D
the experimental results. At this temperature, shear waves are Ar, D=D I
Ar, c =2k
completely lost at all frequencies, and longitudinal modes only
Ar, V ~2V
contribute to the heat capacity. Therefore, the crossover from N , V ~2V
a rigid to a nonrigid liquid at τ ≈ τ0 is accompanied by the Liquid
decrease in the specific heat from its solid-state value to the
Solid
1
value of 2kB , 1 10 P/Pc 100
a rigid liquid can possibly have. A further decrease in heat lines for Ar, Ne, and N I
capacity corresponds to the loss of longitudinal modes as the
temperature is increased until the dense gas state (nonrigid 1
liquid) is reached with cV = 3kB /2. Solid
Having discussed the main physical properties that change 1 10 P/Pc 100 1000
at the crossover (1), we now provide numerical and experi- T
Liquid
mental evidence supporting our proposal. 100 Liquid-gas
II I
ρ =ρ (d)
τ =τ
D=D
VII. EVIDENCE FROM MOLECULAR DYNAMICS
T/Tc
10 c =2k
SIMULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA V =2V
N , V ~2V
We have drawn the lines determined by conditions (1),
1
(2), (3), (5), and (7), for real substances (Ar, Ne, and N2 ) Solid
and model particle systems with Lennard-Jones (LJ) and soft- 1 ρ /ρc 10
sphere potentials (SSps) (Figs. 4 and 5). Details of molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations are given in the Appendix.
FIG. 4. (Color online) (a)–(c) (T ,P ) phase diagram and (d) (T ,ρ)
It is well known that the LJ potential adequately represents
phase diagram of the LJ liquid in the relative critical coordinates.
the behavior of many molecular and rare gas liquids, whereas,
Panels (a) and (d) present calculated lines defined by different
SSp systems describe a behavior of many real substances at
criteria (see the text). Panel (b) presents some experimental data from
very high pressures where an attractive term of the interparticle Ref. [12]. Stars in panel (b) correspond to known experimental points
potential can be neglected. We have calculated points on the where the liquid loses shear waves and positive dispersion (open
phase diagram that correspond to strict equalities τ = τ0 , symbol for Ar [20] and solid symbol for N2 [22]). Experimental
3kT /2 = Epot , Vs = 2Vth , D = Dc , and cV = 2kB , hence, critical isochors are also shown in panel (b) (dashed olive line for Ne
moderate differences between the lines are not unexpected as and dashed-dotted olive line for Ar). Experimental data for criterion
discussed above. (3) for nitrogen and points (solid circles) from the simulation of the
According to Fig. 4, the position of the crossover line LJ system in Fig. 2 (with the same color) are shown in panel (d). Panel
[condition (1)] for the Lennard-Jones system agrees with the (c) illustrates a narrow crossover zone according to different criteria
line determined by condition (5) at moderate pressures P < for the LJ system and real liquids. In all cases, number I corresponds
10 − 102 Pc and with the lines determined by conditions to the rigid liquid, and number II corresponds to the nonrigid one.
(3) and (7) at high pressures P > 10Pc . At low pressures, In panel (d),the density from the liquid side is shown for the melting
the lines determined by conditions (3) and (7) shift from curve.
the crossover line (1) due to critical point anomalies and
loss of Debye approximation at low densities. As discussed (n = 6), 3kT /2 ≈ 0.3Epot ]. For a soft-sphere system, the lines
above, condition (2) is not directly based on condition (1), determined by conditions (1), (3), and (7) match well over the
and the proportionality coefficient in Eq. (2) differs from 1 entire pressure range (Fig. 5) as no critical point and associated
significantly [for LJ particles, 3kT /2 ≈ 5Epot, for SSp particles anomalies exist for this system.
031203-5
BRAZHKIN, FOMIN, LYAPIN, RYZHOV, AND TRACHENKO PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
100 1400
(a) II Neon
1200
1000
10 Liquid T
I τ =τ 800
c =2k
V V 600
1 Solid K=E P=10Pc
η=η 400
P=30Pc
10 100 1000 200 P=100Pc
Pressure
1.0x10
-4 P=10Pc f~exp(Ea /T)
100 α
(b) II P=30Pc f~T
Viscosity (Pa s)
Temperature
-5
8.0x10 P=100Pc
Liquid
10 T 6.0x10
-5
τ =τ
I c =2k -5
4.0x10
1 V =2V
K=E -5
Solid 2.0x10
η=η
1 2 0.0
Density
0.15 P=100Pc
10
Liquid
T 0.10
1 I τ =τ
c =2k
Solid K=E 0.05
0.1
10 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
1 2 3 4
that are significantly above the melting line, implying that
Density the new line separates two distinct liquid states. We also
FIG. 5. (Color online) (T ,P ) and (T ,ρ) phase diagrams of the note that this Frenkel line is located significantly below the
simulated soft-sphere systems with (a) and (b) n = 12 and (c) and isochore, in contrast to the Widom line discussed below in
(d) n = 6. This figure presents calculated lines defined by different more detail. Importantly, the lines of all conditions [with the
criteria including those for the minimum of viscosity η along the exception of condition (5), which is approximate and is valid
isochor in panel (b). In panels (b) and (d), the density from the liquid only at moderate pressures] lie almost parallel to each other
side is shown for the melting curve. Pressure, density, and temperature in the whole range of pressures and temperatures. Notably,
are in standard soft-sphere units. pressure in this range varies by almost 4 orders of magnitude.
We further observe that, by only a slight variation in the
In addition to model systems, we find good agreement proportionality coefficients in criteria (1), (3), and (5), namely,
between the theoretical predictions and experimental data for by a factor of 1.3–1.4, the lines defined by these conditions
liquid Ar, Ne, and N2 (Fig. 4). In particular, we observe a good practically coincide, which testifies to the commonality of
match between the region of the disappearance of the positive physical mechanisms underlying the above criteria. The line
dispersion of sound velocity in liquid Ar [20] and N2 [22] and of criterion (7) coincides with the main line [criterion (1)] for
the dynamic line (Fig. 4). cV = 1.9kB , which differs from cV = 2kB by 5% only.
Despite the approximate way in which conditions (2), (3), The qualitative change in the temperature dependence of
(5), and (7) correspond to condition (1), all the lines defined sound velocity Vsl , viscosity η, and thermal conductivity κ
by different conditions are located within quite a narrow for real substances (Ne, N2 ) also occurs near the crossover
range. We note that these lines are located at temperatures line (Figs. 6 and 7). In fact, condition (1) holds close to the
031203-6
TWO LIQUID STATES OF MATTER: A DYNAMIC LINE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
2.8
LJ liquid, isochoreρ =1
2.6 Ar, isobar P =50P
2.4
cV /kB
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 30
T/Tc
031203-7
BRAZHKIN, FOMIN, LYAPIN, RYZHOV, AND TRACHENKO PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
031203-8
TWO LIQUID STATES OF MATTER: A DYNAMIC LINE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
6 critical
microscopic basis of what is now known as the “viscoelastic”
Calculation
max of α
isochore picture of liquids [1].
4 max of ζ
II (a)
We note that the past few decades have seen considerable re-
max of c
I search into the undercooled metastable state of liquids related
2 to the problem of glass transition. Several dynamic crossovers
have been found that correspond to the mode-coupling
T/Tc
1
Liquid Experiment temperature, the breakdown of the Stokes-Einstein relation,
Ar, max of ζ
Ar, max of c
the crossover from exponential to nonexponential relaxation,
Ne, max of ζ between the Arrhenius and the Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann laws,
Solid Ne, max of c and so on (see, e.g., Ref. [37] and references therein).
1 10 100 1000 On the other hand, there have been no attempts to introduce
P/Pc a dynamic crossover at high temperatures that corresponds to
a fundamental change in the character of atomic motion in a
4
liquid. We note that the line partially related to our condition
(b) (2) was considered earlier, at least, at low pressures [38,39].
3 II I This line corresponds to percolation of “physical clusters.”
T/Tc
031203-9
BRAZHKIN, FOMIN, LYAPIN, RYZHOV, AND TRACHENKO PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
dispersion of sound velocity, as well as specific values of from the diffusion value both at the low-temperature and at the
diffusion constants, speed of sound, and specific heat: D ≈ high-temperature limit where there is a ballistic-collisional
Dc , Vs /Vth ≈ 2, and cV (T ) ≈ 2kB . regime. It makes necessary to compute the values of τ0
and τ along the same isochors at different temperatures and
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS extrapolate the data to see the cross points. The accuracy of
the estimation of the temperature of crossover τ = τ0 is about
The authors wish to thank S. M. Stishov, G. G. Simeoni, ±20%–30%; the errors in the calculations of other values are
F. Gorelli, and H. E. Stanley for valuable discussions. This less than 10%.
work has been supported by the RFBR (Grants No. 11-02- The values of τ0 and τ as well as the temperature of
00303, No. 11-02-00341, and No. 10-02-01407) and by the disappearance of solidlike vibration motion under heating also
Programs of the Presidium of RAS. K.T. is grateful to EPSRC. were extracted from the analysis of the self-intermediate scat-
tering function Fs (q,t) and velocity autocorrelation function
APPENDIX
We have studied the LJ liquid and two soft-sphere (SSp) liq-
uids with n = 12 and n = 6 in a very wide range of parameters, q=0.79 ρ =1.0
from temperature T = 0.6 (well below the critical point) to T =
100.0 and densities from 0.1 to 2.7 for the LJ liquid, T = 0
0.1–100 and density in the range of 0.1–3.33 for the SSp liquid 1.0
2
with n = 12, and T = 1.0–10 and density in the range of 0.5–4.5
dFs (q,t)/dt
for the SSp liquid with n = 6. We also have studied SSp liquids 0.8
T=10
with high values of n up to 100 for the calculation of Epot and T=20
0.6
cV . An essential property of soft spheres is that the phase di- -5 T=30
2
Fs(q,t)
agram corresponds to the equationγ = ρσ 3 ( kBεT )3/n = const. 0.4
T=50
T=70
The parameters γ for n = 12 and n = 6 systems were taken as T=100
γ12 = 1.15 and γ6 =1.22 [30]. System size in the simulations 0.2
varied depending on the density reaching 4000 particles at the 0.0 (a)
0.01 0.1 1 10
highest density. The cutoff radius was set at 2.5σ for LJ and -10 t
SSp with n = 12 and half the box size for SSp with n = 6. 0.1 1
The equations of state were integrated by the velocity Verlet t
algorithm. The temperature was kept constant during the equi- 1.0
libration by velocities rescaling. When the equilibrium was ρ =1.0
reached, the system was simulated in NVE ensemble. The usual
equilibration period was 1.5 × 106 steps, and the production 0.06
run was 0.5 × 106 steps where the time step was dt = 0.001 LJ
units. The soft-sphere system was simulated in NVE ensemble.
〈v(0)v(t)〉
The system consisted of 1000 particles, and the time step 0.5
was 0.0005. The equilibration and production periods were 0.00
3.5 × 106 and 0.5 × 106 steps, respectively. The simulations T=2
and computation of properties were performed in the same way T=5
T=10
as for the LJ system. We also use the data of the potential energy T=20
0.1 0.2 0.3
and equation of state for the LJ fluid from Ref. [43] and the T=30
melting line of the LJ system from Ref. [44]. Everywhere in the 0.0 T=50
T=70
text and in the figures, densities, temperatures, and pressures T=100 (b)
of the LJ liquid are given in the units ρ/ρc , T /Tc , and P /Pc .
The following critical parameters, averaged from literature 0.01 0.1
sources, were used for the LJ system: ρc = 0.314, Tc = 1.31. t
To calculate the Debye period τ0 , we analyzed many
particle trajectories. At low temperatures, τ0 was obtained FIG. 12. (Color online) Self-intermediate scattering functions (in
as the average time of oscillatory motion at one equilibrium the inset) and (a) their second-order time derivatives and (b) velocity
position of an atom before jumping to another position. At high autocorrelation functions of the LJ liquid along the isochor ρ = 1.
Temperature T is pointed out in LJ units. One can see the maxima
temperatures, the oscillations disappear, and the motion of the
of the second-order derivatives in panel (a). The maxima at shorter
particle consists of collisional movement only. The value of
times correspond to the presence of vibrations, whereas, the maxima
τ was calculated as the time it takes a particle to move the
at larger times correspond to ballisticlike jumps. The disappearance
distance close to the average interparticle separation. Then, of the maxima at the short time region occurs at T between 30 and
−2/3
it can be estimated as τ = ρ6D , where D is the diffusion 50, and it corresponds to the rigid liquid nonrigid liquid transition.
coefficient. D was calculated from the long-time limit of mean Similarly, there are qualitative changes in the velocity autocorrelation
square displacement using the Einstein relation. We note that function behavior in the same temperature region. Oscillations in
τ0 can be obtained in the low-temperature limit where the the rigid liquid state take place, whereas, monotonic decay of
oscillations are well pronounced, whereas, τ can be calculated autocorrelation functions in the nonrigid liquid state is observed.
031203-10
TWO LIQUID STATES OF MATTER: A DYNAMIC LINE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
[1] J. Frenkel, Kinetic Theory of Liquids (Oxford University Press, [18] W-C. Pilgrim and C. Morcel, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, R585
New York, 1946). (2006).
[2] J. C. Maxwell, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 157, 49 [19] T. Scopigno, G. Ruocco, and F. Sette, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 881
(1867). (2005).
[3] D. C. Wallace, Phys. Rev. E 56, 4179 (1997). [20] G. G. Simeoni et al., Nat. Phys. 6, 503 (2010).
[4] E. D. Chisolm and D. C. Wallace, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, [21] F. Gorelli, M. Santoro, T. Scopigno, M. Krisch, and G. Ruocco,
R739 (2001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 245702 (2006).
[5] M. Grimsditch, R. Bhadra, and L. M. Torell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, [22] F. Bencivenga et al., Europhys. Lett. 75, 70 (2006).
2616 (1989). [23] F. Bencivenga, A. Cunsolo, M. Krisch, G. Monaco, L. Orsingher,
[6] T. Pezeril, C. Klieber, S. Andrieu, and K. A. Nelson, Phys. Rev. G. Ruocco, F. Sette, and A. Vispa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 085501
Lett. 102, 107402 (2009). (2007).
[7] S. Hosokawa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 105502 (2009). [24] F. Bencivenga et al., J. Chem. Phys. 130, 064501 (2009).
[8] Y. Jeong, S. R. Nagel, and S. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. A 34, [25] C. R. Reid and T. K. Sherwood, in The Properties of Gases and
602 (1986). Liquids, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).
[9] C. J. Roberts, A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, and P. G. Debenedetti, [26] R. Zwanzig and R. D. Mountain, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 4464 (1965).
Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4386 (1996). [27] G. Grimvall, Phys. Scr. 11, 81 (1975).
[10] New Kinds of Phase Transitions: Transformations in Disordered [28] K. Trachenko, Phys. Rev. B 78, 104201 (2008).
Substances, Proceedings of NATO Advanced Research Work- [29] W. G. Hoover, S. G. Gray, and K. W. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys.
shop, Volga River, edited by V. V. Brazhkin, S. V. Buldyrev, 55, 1128 (1971).
V. N. Ryzhov, and H. [Link] (Kluwer, Dordrecht, [30] D. M. Heyes and A. C. Branka, Mol. Phys. 107, 309 (2009).
2002). [31] Z. Shi, P. G. Debenedetti, F. H. Stillinger, and P. Ginart, J. Chem.
[11] P. F. McMillan, J. Mater. Chem. 14, 1506 (2004). Phys. 135, 084513 (2011).
[12] NIST Chemistry WebBook [[Link] [32] G. Malescio, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 073101 (2007).
[13] S. M. Stishov, JETP Lett. 57, 196 (1993). [33] M. H. J. Hagen et al., Nature (London) 365, 425 (1993).
[14] J. P. Boon and S. Yip, Molecular Hydrodynamics (McGraw-Hill [34] A. P. Gast and W. B. Russel, Phys. Today 51(12), 24 (1998).
International Book Company, New York, 1980). [35] L. Xu et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16558 (2005).
[15] U. Balucani and M. Zoppi, Dynamics of the Liquid State [36] V. V. Brazhkin et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 14112 (2011).
(Clarendon, Oxford, 1994). [37] F. Mallamace et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22457
[16] E. Pontecorvo, M. Krisch, A. Cunsolo, G. Monaco, A. Mermet, (2010).
R. Verbeni, F. Sette, and G. Ruocco, Phys. Rev. E 71, 011501 [38] A. Coniglio, U. De Angelis, and A. Forlani, J. Phys. A 10, 1123
(2005). (1977).
[17] T. Bryk et al., J. Chem. Phys. 133, 024502 (2010). [39] X. Campi, H. Krivine, and N. Sator, Physica A 296, 24 (2001).
031203-11
BRAZHKIN, FOMIN, LYAPIN, RYZHOV, AND TRACHENKO PHYSICAL REVIEW E 85, 031203 (2012)
[40] Y. Rosenfeld, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 5415 (1999). [44] R. Agrawal and D. A. Kofke, Mol. Phys. 85, 43 (1995).
[41] Y. Hiwatari et al., Progr. Theor. Phys. 52, 1105 (1974). [45] W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1376 (1994).
[42] M. J. Pond, J. R. Errigton, and T. M. Truskett, Soft Matter 7, [46] T. B. Schroder, S. Sastry, J. C. Dyre, and S. C. Glotzer, J. Chem.
9859 (2011). Phys. 112, 9834 (2000).
[43] K. Meier, Ph.D. thesis, University of the Federal Armed Forces [47] G. De Lorenzi-Venneri, E. D. Chisolm, and D. C. Wallace, Phys.
Hamburg, 2002. Rev. E 78, 041205 (2008).
031203-12