Supercritical Liquid-Gas Dynamics Analysis
Supercritical Liquid-Gas Dynamics Analysis
A liquid near the melting curve has much more in The condition 0 is related to the microscopic dy-
common with a solid than with a gas. For example, a liquid namics at the Frenkel line, although determining the line
supports transverse collective modes at high frequency that using this condition can be done in an approximate way
endow the liquid with shear rigidity at that frequency only. When and 0 become comparable, particle motion
[1–6]. To denote this state of the liquid, the term ‘‘rigid may not be uniquely separated into oscillations and jumps.
liquid’’ was proposed [7]. In the rigid liquid, particle Besides, the separation of quasiharmonic oscillations in a
motion consists of fairly rare jumps and oscillatory motion liquid into longitudinal and transverse is not rigorously
between the jumps. This is reflected in relaxation time , defined at high temperature. For this reason, an important
the time between two consecutive particle jumps at one question remains about how to rigorously define the dra-
point in space, being larger than the shortest vibration matic crossover at the Frenkel line.
period 0 (0 ¼ 2=!0 , where !0 is the maximal fre- The main aim of this work is to identify the dynamic
quency of transverse modes). This description of liquid crossover on the basis of uniquely defined physical char-
dynamics has been proposed by Frenkel [8], and was acteristics: velocity autocorrelation function ZðtÞ and
subsequently rediscovered and used in a number of papers mean-square displacement hr2 ðtÞi. Among other proper-
(see, e.g., Refs. [9–11]). ties, we discuss positive sound dispersion and its behavior
Recently, we have shown that the condition 0 at the Frenkel line.
defines a line, the Frenkel line on the phase diagram that Velocity autocorrelation function (VAF) ZðtÞ is
separates the state of the rigid liquid from the ‘‘nonrigid’’ defined as
gaslike fluid [7,12–14]. Crossing the Frenkel line on tem-
ZðtÞ ¼ hvð0ÞvðtÞi: (1)
perature increase results in the disappearance of shear
rigidity at all frequencies, specific heat reaching 2kB , It is well known that ZðtÞ for the gas is a monotonically
and, importantly, the qualitative change of temperature decaying function, whereas for solids and liquids near
dependence of key system properties [7,12,13]. The line melting it has both oscillatory and decaying components
is universal: it separates two states at arbitrarily high (see Refs. [16,17] and references therein). ZðtÞ for various
pressure and temperature, and exists in systems where liquids was studied in detail. In the early paper [18], it was
liquid-gas transition is absent. found that ZðtÞ for supercritical Lennard-Jones (LJ) fluids
A particularly interesting consequence of crossing the may contain both liquidlike and gaslike features, although
Frenkel line from above is the appearance of positive sound this fact did not attract subsequent attention. Hiwatari and
dispersion (PSD) [7], the increase of the speed of sound at coauthors have found that depending on the density, ZðtÞ is
high frequency [4–6]. Recently, an attempt was made to qualitatively different in soft-sphere (SSp) fluids [19]. This
locate the dynamical line on the basis of molecular dy- was followed by the attempt to relate the oscillations of
namics simulations of PSD for supercritical Ar [15]. ZðtÞ and atomic vibrations in SSp fluid [20]. No detailed
1 .0
analysis of ZðtÞ was performed up to date to distinguish the 0.2 T=10
(a) T=15
dynamics between systems in the liquid and gaslike fluid 0.8
0.1 T=20
states.
2
(1/6D)d < r >/dt
analysis of hr2 ðtÞi was performed in this time regime. 5 10
<r >
We note that the second time derivative of hr2 ðtÞi is
2
1
0
2
proportional to ZðtÞ. Indeed, using the well-known 0.1
equation (see, for example, Ref. [16]) -5 0.01 Time
Zt
hr2 ðtÞi ¼ 6 ðt sÞZðsÞds; -10
0.01 0.1 1 10
0
0.1 1
one has Time
@2 =@t2 hr2 ðtÞi ¼ 6ZðtÞ: (2) 1.0
0.1 n =12 T=0.57
Therefore, the analysis of the second derivative of hr2 ðtÞi T=1
T=2
and ZðtÞ is formally equivalent. < v (0)v (t ) > T=4
0.0
We have studied LJ liquid and SSp liquids with different 0.5 T=6
exponent n and in a wide range of parameters. The phase T=8
T=10
diagram of the SSp system corresponds to the equation -0.1 T=20.57
0.1 0.2 0.3
¼ 3 ð"=kB TÞ3=n ¼ const. Here, the values of ¼ 0.0
2:33 for n ¼ 6; ¼ 1:15 for n ¼ 12, and ¼ 0:942 for (c)
n ¼ 36 have been calculated using the data obtained in
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Ref. [21]. In the simulations of the LJ liquid, the system Time
size varied depending on the density reaching 4000 parti-
1.0
cles at the highest density. The equations of state were 0.02 T=2.06
n =36
integrated using the velocity Verlet algorithm; the systems T=4.06
0.00 T=8.06
were simulated in the number of particles-volume-energy T=16.06
< v (0)v (t ) >
145901-2
week ending
PRL 111, 145901 (2013) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 4 OCTOBER 2013
component of motion. Consequently, the temperature at system at high pressure, the temperature of the Frenkel
the Frenkel line can be naturally chosen at the ‘‘critical’’ line exceeds the melting temperature by a factor of 4–5 on
temperature at which minima and maxima of the function the isobar.
in question disappear. We observe that the second deriva- Importantly, we observe in Fig. 2(b) that the calculated
tives of hr2 ðtÞi have the same functional time dependence line perfectly agrees with all other experimental and theo-
as ZðtÞ, consistent with Eq. (2). The coincidence of retical criteria of the Frenkel line proposed previously [7].
@2 =@t2 hr2 ðtÞi and ZðtÞ and their temperature evolution We therefore find that the phase diagram of the LJ system
serves as a self-consistency check in our calculations. contains a sharp boundary separating the states of the rigid
The line corresponding to the change of dynamics liquid and nonrigid gaslike state.
according to the above criterion is shown in Fig. 2. For both LJ and SSp systems, we study the dispersion of
In Fig. 2(a) we observe that the temperature of the calcu- the longitudinal collective mode !L ðqÞ. We detect PSD in
lated line is about 1.5–1.7 times lower than the line both LJ and SSp systems at low temperature, and find that
approximately defined from one of the previous criterion, PSD disappears on temperature increase quite close to the
0 . The difference is related to the uncertainty in calculated Frenkel line. The existence of PSD in the SSp
determining high-frequency longitudinal and transverse system at low temperatures (Fig. 3) is an important result.
oscillations on the basis of visual analysis of trajectories It means that the presence or absence of PSD is not related
made in Refs. [7,12,13]. We also note that for the LJ to the continuation of the boiling curve and the critical
point whatsoever, contrary to the previous discussions
100 Calculation for LJ liquid [6,15]. Rather, PSD and its crossover are purely dynamic
Tm Liquid
in origin.
liquid-gas
Definition of Frenkel line In Figs. 4 we show the calculated Frenkel line on the
from PRE (2012) (τ =τ0)
II I phase diagrams for the SSp system with n ¼ 6, 12, and 36.
from < v (0)v (t ) >
We note that the terms gas and liquid are not appropriate
T/Tc
10 2 2
and d < r >/dt
2
(calculation at P =const) for the SSp system with no vapor-liquid coexistence curve;
from < v (0)v (t )> nevertheless, the qualitative change of the particle dynam-
(calculation at ρ =const)
Solid ics from the liquidlike to gaslike takes place in this system
1
(a)
1 10 100 1000
25 (a) ρ =1, T=2
P/Pc
20
100
Calculation for LJ liquid
Tm Liquid 15
ω
10
Frenkel line
cV =2kB 9
Vs =2Vth
10
CL
8
loss of PSD II I
7
10 Experiment 5
T/Tc
Ar, cV =2kB 6 Q
Ar, Vs~2Vth 0 1 2 3 4
N2, Vs~2Vth 0
Solid 60
(b)
1 50 ρ =1, T=40
(b)
40
ω
1 10 100 1000
P/Pc 30
20
FIG. 2 (color online). (P, T) phase diagram of the LJ liquid in
the relative critical coordinates. Panel (a) compares previous 10
criteria of the Frenkel line from Ref. [7]. The shaded region 0
covers all experimental and calculated curves from Ref. [7], 0 1 2 3 4
together with the Frenkel line calculated in this work. Panel Q
(b) compares positions of the Frenkel line found in this work
with calculated and experimental curves and points defined by FIG. 3 (color online). Dispersion curves !ðQÞ (blue circles
different criteria (see Ref. [7] and references therein). Black with bars) for the simulated soft-sphere systems with n ¼ 12 at
circles correspond to the disappearance of PSD under heating low (a) and high (b) temperatures. The inset shows the longitu-
calculated in the present work. Red dashed line in panel (b) dinal velocity CL ¼ !=Q vs wave vector Q dependence for the
shows the dynamic line proposed in Ref. [15]. In all cases I case (a), illustrating the PSD. Thick solid lines in panels (a) and
corresponds to the rigid liquid state and II to the nonrigid gaslike (b) and the triangle in the inset correspond to the adiabatic sound
state. velocity at Q ¼ 0.
145901-3
week ending
PRL 111, 145901 (2013) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 4 OCTOBER 2013
145901-4
week ending
PRL 111, 145901 (2013) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 4 OCTOBER 2013
at which PSD disappears for Ar, calculated by the same [5] F. Gorelli, M. Santoro, T. Scopigno, M. Krisch, and
authors [6,15], differ widely. Indeed, at T ¼ 3:8Tc , PSD G. Ruocco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 245702 (2006).
disappears at P < 80Pc according to Ref. [6], and at [6] G. G. Simeoni, T. Bryk, F. A. Gorelli, M. Krisch, G.
P < 30Pc according to Ref. [15]. Ruocco, M. Santoro, and T. Scopigno, Nat. Phys. 6, 503
(2010).
In summary, we proposed a criterion to locate the
[7] V. V. Brazhkin, Yu. D. Fomin, A. G. Lyapin, V. N. Ryzhov,
dynamic Frenkel line on the phase diagram of fluids that and K. Trachenko, Phys. Rev. E 85, 031203 (2012).
is both mathematically rigorous and convenient for simu- [8] J. Frenkel, Kinetic Theory of Liquids, edited by R. H.
lations. The calculated Frenkel line for the LJ and SSp Fowler, P. Kapitza, and N. F. Mott (Oxford University
systems coincides with various experimental data for rare- Press, Oxford, 1947).
gas fluids as well as with the data calculated on the basis of [9] R. Zwanzig, Phys. Rev. 156, 190 (1967).
other important physical criteria such as cv ¼ 2kB . For the [10] D. C. Wallace, Phys. Rev. E 56, 4179 (1997).
LJ system, the Frenkel line starts from the boiling curve [11] E. D. Chisolm and D. C. Wallace, J. Phys. Condens. Matter
at T 0:7–0:8Tc . The region of the rigid liquid shrinks 13, R739 (2001).
with the increase of the exponent of the repulsive part of [12] V. V. Brazhkin, A. G. Lyapin, V. N. Ryzhov, K. Trachenko,
interparticle potential. The new criterion opens an exciting Yu. D. Fomin, and E. N. Tsiok, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 182, 1137
(2012) [Sov. Phys. Usp. 55, 1061 (2012)].
possibility to calculate and map the dynamical line for
[13] V. V. Brazhkin, Yu. D. Fomin, A. G. Lyapin, V. N. Ryzhov,
various liquids with different types of structure and and K. Trachenko, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 95, 179
interactions. (2012) [JETP Lett. 95, 164 (2012)].
The authors wish to thank S. M. Stishov and N. M. [14] V. V. Brazhkin and K. Trachenko, Phys. Today 65, No. 11,
Chtchelkatchev for valuable discussions. The work has 68 (2012).
been supported by the RFBR (Grants No. 11-02-00303, [15] F. A. Gorelli, T. Bryk, M. Krisch, G. Ruocco, M. Santoro,
No. 11-02-00341, and No. 13-02-01207) and by the and T. Scopigno, Sci. Rep. 3, 1203 (2013).
Programs of the Presidium of RAS. K. T. is grateful to [16] J. P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids
EPSRC. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, 2007).
[17] Sh.-T. Liu, M. Blanco, and W. A. Goddard, III, J. Chem.
Phys. 119, 11 792 (2003).
[18] D. Levesque and L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. A 2, 2514 (1970).
[19] Y. Hiwatari, H. Matsuda, T. Ogava, N. Ogita, and A. Ueda,
[1] M. Grimsditch, R. Bhadra, and L. M. Torell, Phys. Rev. Prog. Theor. Phys. 52, 1105 (1974).
Lett. 62, 2616 (1989). [20] H. Endo, Y. Endo, and N. Ogita, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 5184
[2] T. Pezeril, C. Klieber, S. Andrieu, and K. A. Nelson, Phys. (1982).
Rev. Lett. 102, 107402 (2009). [21] D. M. Heyes and A. C. Branka, Mol. Phys. 107, 309 (2009).
[3] S. Hosokawa, M. Inui, Y. Kajihara, K. Matsuda, T. [22] D. Bolmatov, V. V. Brazhkin, and K. Trachenko, Sci. Rep.
Ichitsubo, W.-C. Pilgrim, H. Sinn, L. E. González, D. J. 2, 421 (2012).
González, S. Tsutsui, and A. Q. R. Baron, Phys. Rev. Lett. [23] D. Bolmatov, V. V. Brazhkin, and K. Trachenko, Nat.
102, 105502 (2009). Commun. 4, 2331 (2013).
[4] T. Scopigno, G. Ruocco, and F. Sette, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, [24] S. M. Stishov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 57, 189 (1993)
881 (2005). [JETP Lett. 57, 196 (1993)].
145901-5