0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views5 pages

Understanding Requirements Engineering

Requirements engineering (RE) is the process of defining the services and constraints of a system, encompassing user and system requirements, which can be functional or non-functional. The RE process involves elicitation, analysis, validation, and management of requirements, ensuring they are clear, complete, and consistent. Challenges in RE include stakeholder communication, evolving requirements, and the need for precise documentation to avoid ambiguity and conflicts.

Uploaded by

kishoremurali
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views5 pages

Understanding Requirements Engineering

Requirements engineering (RE) is the process of defining the services and constraints of a system, encompassing user and system requirements, which can be functional or non-functional. The RE process involves elicitation, analysis, validation, and management of requirements, ensuring they are clear, complete, and consistent. Challenges in RE include stakeholder communication, evolving requirements, and the need for precise documentation to avoid ambiguity and conflicts.

Uploaded by

kishoremurali
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Requirements Engineering

Reference: Sommerville, Software Engineering, 10 ed., Chapter 4

The big picture


Requirements engineering (RE) is the process of establishing the services that the customer requires from
a system and the constraints under which it operates and is developed. The requirements themselves are the
descriptions of the system services and constraints that are generated during the requirements engineering
process. Requirements may range from a high-level abstract statement of a service or of a system constraint
to a detailed mathematical functional specification. As much as possible, requirements should
describe what the system should do, but not how it should do it.
Two kinds of requirements based on the intended purpose and target audience:
User requirements
High-level abstract requirements written as statements, in a natural language plus diagrams, of what
services the system is expected to provide to system users and the constraints under which it must
operate.
System requirements
Detailed description of what the system should do including the software system's functions, services,
and operational constraints. The system requirements document (sometimes called a functional
specification) should define exactly what is to be implemented. It may be part of the contract between
the system buyer and the software developers.
Three classes of requirements:
Functional requirements
Statements of services the system should provide, how the system should react to particular inputs
and how the system should behave in particular situations. May state what the system should not do.
Non-functional requirements
Constraints on the services or functions offered by the system such as timing constraints, constraints
on the development process, standards, etc. Often apply to the system as a whole rather than
individual features or services.
Domain requirements
Constraints on the system derived from the domain of operation.
Functional requirements
Functional requirements describe functionality or system services. They depend on the type of software,
expected users and the type of system where the software is used.

• Functional user requirements may be high-level statements of what the system should do.
• Functional system requirements should describe the system services in detail.

Problems arise when requirements are not precisely stated. Ambiguous requirements may be interpreted in
different ways by developers and users. In principle, requirements should be both

• Complete: they should include descriptions of all facilities required, and


• Consistent: there should be no conflicts or contradictions in the descriptions of the system
facilities.

In practice, it is impossible to produce a complete and consistent requirements document.

Non-functional requirements
Non-functional requirements define system properties and constraints e.g. reliability, response time and
storage requirements. Constraints are I/O device capability, system representations, etc. Process requirements
may also be specified mandating a particular IDE, programming language or development method. Non-
functional requirements may be more critical than functional requirements. If these are not met, the system
may be useless.
Non-functional requirements may affect the overall architecture of a system rather than the individual
components. A single non-functional requirement, such as a security requirement, may generate a number of
related functional requirements that define system services that are required. It may also generate
requirements that restrict existing requirements.

Three classes of non-functional requirements:


Product requirements
Requirements which specify that the delivered product must behave in a particular way e.g. execution
speed, reliability, etc.
Organizational requirements
Requirements which are a consequence of organizational policies and procedures e.g. process
standards used, implementation requirements, etc.
External requirements
Requirements which arise from factors which are external to the system and its development process
e.g. interoperability requirements, legislative requirements, etc.
Non-functional requirements may be very difficult to state precisely and imprecise requirements may be
difficult to verify. If they are stated as a goal (a general intention of the user such as ease of use), they should
be rewritten as a verifiable non-functional requirement (a statement using some quantifiable metric that
can be objectively tested). Goals are helpful to developers as they convey the intentions of the system users.

Domain requirements
The system's operational domain imposes requirements on the system. Domain requirements may be new
functional or non-functional requirements, constraints on existing requirements, or define specific
computations. If domain requirements are not satisfied, the system may be unworkable. Two
main problems with domain requirements:
Understandability
Requirements are expressed in the language of the application domain, which is not always
understood by software engineers developing the system.
Implicitness
Domain specialists understand the area so well that they do not think of making the domain
requirements explicit.
Requirements engineering process
Processes vary widely depending on the application domain, the people involved and the organization
developing the requirements. In practice, requirements engineering is an iterative process, in which the
following generic activities are interleaved:

• Requirements elicitation;
• Requirements analysis;
• Requirements validation;
• Requirements management.

Requirements elicitation and analysis


Software engineers work with a range of system stakeholders to find out about the application domain, the
services that the system should provide, the required system performance, hardware constraints, other
systems, etc. Stages include:
Requirements discovery
Interacting with stakeholders to discover their requirements. Domain requirements are also discovered
at this stage.
Requirements classification and organization
Groups related requirements and organizes them into coherent clusters.
Prioritization and negotiation
Prioritizing requirements and resolving requirements conflicts.
Requirements specification
Requirements are documented and input into the next round of the spiral.
Closed (based on pre-determined list of questions) and open interviews with stakeholders are a part of the
RE process. User stories and scenarios are real-life examples of how a system can be used, which are
usually easy for stakeholders to understand. Scenarios should include descriptions of the starting situation,
normal flow of events, what can go wrong, other concurrent activities, the state of the system when the
scenario finishes.
Use-cases are a scenario-based technique in the UML which identify the actors in an interaction and which
describe the interaction itself. A set of use cases should describe all possible interactions with the system.
Problems to look for during requirements elicitation and analysis:

• Stakeholders don't know what they really want.


• Stakeholders express requirements in their own terms.
• Different stakeholders may have conflicting requirements.
• Organizational and political factors may influence the system requirements.
• The requirements change during the analysis process.
• New stakeholders may emerge and the business environment may change.

Requirements specification
Requirements specification is the process of writing down the user and system requirements in a
requirements document. User requirements have to be understandable by end-users and customers who do
not have a technical background. System requirements are more detailed requirements and may include more
technical information. The requirements may be part of a contract for the system development and it is
important that these are as complete as possible.
In principle, requirements should state what the system should do and the design should describe how it does
this. In practice, requirements and design are inseparable.
User requirements are almost always written in natural language supplemented by appropriate diagrams and
tables in the requirements document. System requirements may also be written in natural language but other
notations based on forms, graphical system models, or mathematical system models can also be used. Natural
language is expressive, intuitive and universal. This means that the requirements can be understood by users
and customers.
Structured natural language is a way of writing system requirements where the freedom of the
requirements writer is limited and all requirements are written in a standard way. This approach maintains
most of the expressiveness and understand-ability of natural language but ensures that some uniformity is
imposed on the specification.

Requirements validation
Requirements validation is concerned with demonstrating that the requirements define the system that the
customer really wants. Requirements error costs are high so validation is very important.
What problems to look for:

• Validity: does the system provide the functions which best support the customer's needs?
• Consistency: are there any requirements conflicts?
• Completeness: are all functions required by the customer included?
• Realism: can the requirements be implemented given available budget and technology?
• Verifiability: can the requirements be checked?

Requirements validation techniques:


Requirements reviews
Systematic manual analysis of the requirements. Regular reviews should be held while the
requirements definition is being formulated. What to look for:

• Verifiability: is the requirement realistically testable?


• Comprehensibility: is the requirement properly understood?
• Traceability: is the origin of the requirement clearly stated?
• Adaptability: can the requirement be changed without a large impact on other requirements?

Prototyping
Using an executable model of the system to check requirements.
Test-case generation
Developing tests for requirements to check testability.
Requirements change
Requirements management is the process of managing changing requirements during the requirements
engineering process and system development. New requirements emerge as a system is being developed and
after it has gone into use. Reasons why requirements change after the system's deployment:

• The business and technical environment of the system always changes after installation.
• The people who pay for a system and the users of that system are rarely the same people.
• Large systems usually have a diverse user community, with many users having different
requirements and priorities that may be conflicting or contradictory.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Domain requirements are often challenging because they may not be well understood by software engineers due to the technical language unique to the application domain. Additionally, domain specialists might not make these requirements explicit, assuming that they are obvious, which can lead to requirements being overlooked or misunderstood. Satisfying domain requirements is crucial, as they impact both functional and non-functional aspects of the system, and failing to meet them can render the system unusable .

Requirements validation techniques ensure integrity by systematically checking that requirements align with customer needs (validity), are free of contradictions (consistency), include all necessary functionalities (completeness), are feasible (realism), and are testable (verifiability). Techniques such as reviews, prototyping, and test-case generation allow for detecting errors early, minimizing costly downstream corrections .

Non-functional requirements can significantly affect the overall architecture of a system as they often impose broader constraints like reliability, performance, and security, influencing the choice of software and hardware components. If non-functional requirements such as security or performance aren't met, the architecture might need substantial changes. For instance, a security requirement might necessitate the inclusion of authentication services throughout the system architecture, thereby influencing related functional requirements .

Non-functional requirements can be more critical because they define system-wide constraints like performance, safety, and security that if not met, can render the system ineffective regardless of how well functional requirements are satisfied. These requirements often affect the system's architecture and can lead to failure if not properly addressed. Moreover, a single non-functional requirement can give rise to multiple functional requirements, inherently linking the two .

During requirements elicitation and analysis, several challenges arise, including stakeholders not knowing what they really want, expressing requirements in their own terms, conflicting requirements among different stakeholders, and organizational and political influences. Furthermore, requirements can change during the analysis process and new stakeholders may emerge as the business environment changes .

Organizational requirements influence software development by imposing constraints derived from internal policies and procedures, such as adherence to process standards or preferred programming practices. These requirements ensure that development aligns with the company's strategic goals and operational practices, potentially affecting scheduling, resource allocation, and technology choices. Compliance with these standards can impact software maintainability and integration within the organization .

Structured natural language is significant for requirements specification as it balances the need for expressiveness and clarity. This approach makes requirements understandable to stakeholders while imposing uniformity and reducing ambiguity. It helps ensure that requirements are consistent and verifiable, crucial for documenting precise system behavior and facilitating communication among developers, clients, and users .

Use-cases play a crucial role by providing scenario-based techniques that describe system interactions involving actors and their goals. They help identify all possible interactions with the system, making them valuable for discovering functional requirements. Use-cases facilitate communication with stakeholders by providing concrete examples, aid in clarifying user requirements, and serve as a foundation for designing test cases, ensuring that all relevant scenarios are considered .

Managing requirements changes is critical because the business and technical environments evolve over time, necessitating updates to keep the system relevant and functional. Without proper management, these changes can lead to scope creep, budget overruns, and conflicts within diverse user communities with varying priorities. Effective requirements change management ensures that the system continues to support organizational goals and user needs throughout its lifecycle, minimizing risks associated with unexpected modifications .

Requirements specification and design phases are closely aligned yet can conflict because requirements specify what the system should do while design explains how to achieve it. In practice, these phases are inseparable, as design decisions can clarify or refine requirements. However, premature design choices may constrain requirements unnecessarily. The specification must be complete and consistent, challenging designers to interpret requirements without overstepping into detailed design prematurely .

You might also like