Risk Assessment for Sandblasting & Coating
Risk Assessment for Sandblasting & Coating
Controls
Workplace/A Implemented
Risks Issue (Possible incident) Base Risk Ranking Risk Reduction
ctivity/ Follow up by
[What can go wrong] (Without Controls) Improved Existing Controls / Action Plan
Ref Process/ Hazards Existing Controls Whom (name) &
(Accident/ill health to persons, Implementing New Controls
Equipment/M By When (date) YES NO
fire or property loss)
aterials
L R RR L R RR
Competent personnel only to operate Project
blow torches. Engineer
Ensure no flammable materials are Project
present in the vicinity where torches shall Flash arrestors are to be installed on Supervisor
be used. every gas cylinder. Project QHSE
Use of blow
1 Fire. Explosion burns. Supervisor in place throughout the work. 4 4 16 Gas monitoring if the welding is a 3 2 6 Engineer YES
torches.
Fire extinguishers are to be present at all golden weld or close to the ATEX area
times.
Line of fire awareness.
Work area to be restricted to personnel
involved in the works only.
Full face visor to be worn when operating Project
tools with abrasive wheels. Personnel mounting abrasive wheels Engineer
Abrasive wheels are to be inspected and must be trained and competent to do Project
maintained in good order and condition. so. Supervisor
2 Grinding. Flying particles, or discs. Eye or body injuries. 4 4 16 3 2 6 YES
All guards are in place during operation. Tools are to be checked as per local Project QHSE
Fire extinguisher to be at hand. legislation. Engineer
No loose clothing is to be worn by the
operator.
Only competent operators are to use
blasting equipment.
Blasting is to be carried out from within a
specially designed habitat. Never point
Injury to personnel. Skin
blasting rods in the direction of other
abrasions. The use of (the dead man switch) is
personnel.
Damage to respiratory mandatory before starting.
Ensure the blasting rod has an isolated air
system and lungs as a result Warning signs to be placed to prevent
source to prevent accidental use by Project
of inhalation of dust. unauthorised personnel.
Flying particles. Danger to other others. Engineer
Minor/serious injury to Sandblasting areas with signage
workers and the public. Suitable PPE including Hood to be worn Project
3 Sandblasting. members of the public as a 4 3 12 stating noise hazards etc. 3 2 6 YES
Compressed air. Static electricity. by operatives. Blasting hoses will be Supervisor
result of noise, dust flying Specific training
Noise checked for rips/ruptures before use. Project QHSE
particles etc. Regular inspections of the works are to
Supervisor to ensure that site is kept in Engineer
Minor/serious injury as a be carried out, with noise monitoring
good order at all times with trailing cables
result of exposure to included in the inspection.
kept to a minimum distance and
compressed air.
highlighted where potential hazard exists.
Electric shocks.
All personnel are to exercise awareness
about potentially changing ground
conditions as works progress.
Experienced operators only to be used for
Page 1 of 5
Controls
Workplace/A Implemented
Risks Issue (Possible incident) Base Risk Ranking Risk Reduction
ctivity/ Follow up by
[What can go wrong] (Without Controls) Improved Existing Controls / Action Plan
Ref Process/ Hazards Existing Controls Whom (name) &
(Accident/ill health to persons, Implementing New Controls
Equipment/M By When (date) YES NO
fire or property loss)
aterials
L R RR L R RR
blasting.
All sandblasting hoses and equipment will
be properly earthed and bonded.
Whip checks are to be fitted on all hose
connections.
Vehicles and other equipment are
prohibited from driving over hoses.
All sandblasting hoses and equipment will
be properly earthed and bonded.
If the noise level is above 80dB. The risk
of hearing loss is to be communicated to
the employees and hearing protection
must be provided.
If the noise level is over 85dB. Ear
protection is mandatory.
Constant noise exposure
can progressively damage
employees' hearing, leading Suitable Gloves (as identified in MSDS
MSDS assessments are carried out Project
to difficulty understanding Assessment) to be worn by operatives.
and available to the workforce. Engineer
Application of critical instructions and Spill kits are kept in the vicinity of the
MSDS available to the workforce (read Project
4 chemicals Use of chemicals Products. warnings. This significantly work area. All chemicals are labelled. 4 3 12 3 2 6 YES
& understood), copies issued to the Supervisor
products. increases the risk of Identify specific gloves for handling
medical team, disposed of by EMP. Project QHSE
accidents with the potential epoxy.
Engineer
for serious injuries or
fatalities. Dermatitis &
environmental hazards.
No unauthorised personnel are allowed
within operations. Workers are to wear
All lifting equipment and attachments
high-visibility vests and helmets at all
are to be tested and certified.
times.
Machine operators are trained and Project
Workers are to keep clear of moving
Ground-worker being struck by competent. Certified Slinger/banksman Engineer
machinery at all times and not to
Lifting slewing machine. Ground workers to control all machine movements. Project
5 Crush injury or fatality. approach until signalled by the machine 4 4 16 3 2 6 YES
Operations are being hit by the material being Lifting operations plan to be Supervisor
operator.
lifted by machinery. developed. Project QHSE
Banksman will be deployed to assist in
A colour code is applied to every lifting Engineer
reversing moving plant & machinery.
accessory.
Keep out of the swing radius of the
machine.
Page 2 of 5
Controls
Workplace/A Implemented
Risks Issue (Possible incident) Base Risk Ranking Risk Reduction
ctivity/ Follow up by
[What can go wrong] (Without Controls) Improved Existing Controls / Action Plan
Ref Process/ Hazards Existing Controls Whom (name) &
(Accident/ill health to persons, Implementing New Controls
Equipment/M By When (date) YES NO
fire or property loss)
aterials
L R RR L R RR
Designated haul route of travel.
Right of way is always given to laden
vehicles. No speeding or tail-gating.
No unauthorised personnel are allowed
within operations. Workers are to wear
high-visibility vests and helmets at all
Hands: Cuts, bruises, and
times.
fractures from tying wires or Workers are to keep clear of moving
being struck by swinging Pedestrians to use pedestrian access
machinery at all times and not to
loads. routes were provided.
approach until signalled by the machine
Competent & experienced plant
operator. Banksman will be deployed to
Back: Strain, pain, and operators trained to local standards.
Collisions with another plant on assist in reversing moving plant &
sciatica due to lifting or CCTV and/or convex mirrors to provide Project
site. Contact with moving machinery.
awkward postures. 360° vision for the operator. Engineer
Plant machinery. Overturning. Contact Keep out of the swing radius of the
Musculoskeletal system: Flashing Beacons. Project
7 Machinery with overhead or underground machine. 4 3 12 3 2 6 YES
Injuries to bones, joints, Heavy plants passed the periodic Supervisor
Operations services. Plant in collision with Fire extinguishers are to be kept in
muscles, tendons, inspection as prescribed by local law. Project QHSE
public traffic while exiting site onto machines.
ligaments, and cartilage from Establish traffic control measures Engineer
public road No mobile phone use by drivers while
repetitive motions, forceful when the plant needs to exit the site.
operating the plant.
exertions, or awkward This will consist of flagmen, traffic
Goalposts, bunting and warning signs are
positions. directors and warning signage.
to be put in place at all points where
Soft tissue injuries: Damage
equipment etc. must pass underneath
to tendons, ligaments,
overhead lines.
cartilage, or muscles.
Synchronized movements where the plant
is operating nearby.
Line of fire awareness.
Audible reverse alarms function correctly
on all plants.
Page 3 of 5
Controls
Workplace/A Implemented
Risks Issue (Possible incident) Base Risk Ranking Risk Reduction
ctivity/ Follow up by
[What can go wrong] (Without Controls) Improved Existing Controls / Action Plan
Ref Process/ Hazards Existing Controls Whom (name) &
(Accident/ill health to persons, Implementing New Controls
Equipment/M By When (date) YES NO
fire or property loss)
aterials
L R RR L R RR
Restriction of unauthorised
personnel.
Note: This Risk Assessment must be reviewed if the execution of a new job or any incident occurred on the work site and also after completing 12 months.
Risk Methodology
RISK MATRIX RISK RANKING Likelihood (Probability Levels) Consequences (Impact Levels) Consequences (Impact Levels)
Human Environment
Consequences 5- Frequent: More than 75%.
Likelihoo 1-Minor environmental impact
H – High Very likely to occur or already 1-Single person of the workforce is
d happened. injured, but able to continue work.
which is localized and easy to
1-Slight 2-Minor 3-Moderate 4-Major 5-Massive remedy.
2-Moderate environmental
4- Probable: 51% to 75%. 2-Single person in the workforce 1 impact within the Project area
Frequent 5 10 15 20 25
More than likely to occur than or 2 days off work with a moderate of influence.
not. reversible health effect.
M – Medium
3- Seldom: 50%. Chances for 3-Significant environmental
Portable 4 8 12 16 20 occurrence/non-occurrence 3-Single person in the workforce 3 impact beyond the Project Area of
are equal. days off work with a moderate Influence.
irreversible health effect.
4-Major environmental impact
2- Unlikely: 10-49%. Less likely 4-1 fatality or single person of beyond the Project Area of
Seldom 3 6 9 12 15
to occur than not public hospitalized or with severe Influence which is hard to
L – Low irreversible health effect. remedy.
Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10
5- Catastrophic damage to the
5-Multiple fatalities or multiple
1- Improbable: Up to 10%. environment which cannot be
persons of public hospitalized or
Ranking / Risk must be with severe irreversible health contained and which interrupts
Improbable. the pipeline development
Improbabl moderate (M) or low (L) effects.
1 2 3 4 5 progress.
e before you can start
work.
Page 4 of 5
RISK ASSESSMENT TEAM
Prepared By Reviewed By Approved By
Name: Tara Name: Name:
Date: 16-06-2024 Date: Date:
Page 5 of 5