Atlantic Computer
Case Summary
What should be the price of Tronn? And what will be reaction of consumers and How will be response of competitor on pricing strategy?
Analysis :
There are four strategy of fixing price of Tronn. They are as follow:
-->Stick with company tradition by charging only for hardware and give the PESA tool for free. -->Charge a price equal to what the customer would pay for four Onterio Zink servers. -->Charge price based on cost plus approach to pricing PESA. -->Charge a price based on value-in-use pricing.
Following factor influence the pricing strategy of Tronn:
-->The server division's traditional focus on hardware. Because server division has not given more emphasis on software tool. And that make Matzer to provide PESA free. -->Second is division has longly relied up on cost-plus pricing analysis.
-->Based on internal performance test results,customer in the web-server and file-sharing Applications appeared to be the ones that would benefit most from the tool.{PESA}.
Pricing Strategies
Charging for hardware and giving software for free Charge price according to four Onterio Zink Charge price based on cost plus approach.
Merits
Product will be successful because its success depends upon their ability to sell it with software tool. It will increase profit of company. Nominal price. Customer will get option to buy only basic server without PESA.
De-merits
Revenue willdecrease. Profit will also be low. Onterio may reduce Zinks price. Company will lose opportunity to earn high profits.
Atlantic Computer
Standard approach of pricing. Price is comparatively less as compared to other strategies. More opportunity to earn profit.
Charge price on basis of value-in-use.
It becomes costly from consumer point of view.
Pricing Strategies
Charging for hardware and giving software for free Charge price according to four Onterio Zink Charge price based on cost plus approach. Charge price on basis of value-in-use.
Selling price
2000
Cost price
1538
Profits(per unit)
462
Total profit(21180 units)
97,85,160
6800
1632
5168
10,94,58,240
2245/2000
1726/1538
519/462
54,96,210/48,92,580
4200
1632
2568
5,43,90,240
Interpretation:
According to my opinion Cost plus strategy is best because in this method there is a good profit and also it is consumer oriented. Both consumer and company will benifited by this method.