0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views1 page

HackerRank Real-Time Evaluation Test

The document discusses an A/B testing process used by Intact Financial Corporation to evaluate a new feature on their website. It describes how the experiment divides clients into two groups and uses a p-value threshold of 0.05 to determine whether to implement the new feature. The document also presents options for conclusions regarding the experiment's methodology and client exposure to the new feature.

Uploaded by

Aamir Jadoon
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views1 page

HackerRank Real-Time Evaluation Test

The document discusses an A/B testing process used by Intact Financial Corporation to evaluate a new feature on their website. It describes how the experiment divides clients into two groups and uses a p-value threshold of 0.05 to determine whether to implement the new feature. The document also presents options for conclusions regarding the experiment's methodology and client exposure to the new feature.

Uploaded by

Aamir Jadoon
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

14/10/2021, 22:13 HackerRank

Data Scientist - Intact Financial Corporation  Aamir Khan 

57 mins Answered: 1 / 14

5. A/B testing II
ALL
We perform an online experiment to test a new feature: half of our clients receive the
new feature, while the other half keeps the same feature and we measure how much
 time they spend on our website.

1 We use p < 0.05 to decide to implement our feature. Our backend tool monitors the
experiments and sends an email every day to the experimenter with the p-value, and

2 the ability to continue or conclude the experiment. Most of our experimenters stop
the experiment when they reach significant difference between features (p < 0.05).
What would you conclude from our process?
3

Pick ONE OR MORE options


4

You should change your p-value threshold.


5

You could conclude the experiment automatically as


6 soon as the p-value goes below 0.05.

7 The p-values from the experiments are probably higher


than estimated.

8
The proportion of clients exposed to new features
should be increased.

9
The proportion of clients exposed to new features
should be decreased.
10

Clear Selection

11

12

[Link] 1/1

You might also like