1
All the three papers explored the PM impairment in patients diagnosed with
schizophrenia, with paper 2 focusing on symptomatically remitted male schizophrenic
patients. all the behavioral tasks of three studies showed the PM deficit is a primary deficit
rather than a secondary one.
Paper 1 found that schizophrenic patients performed significantly poorly on all subtypes
of PM tasks and that impairment arising from problems in the cue detection and intention
retrieval stages, which are core characteristics of PM and required self-initiation process that
involve prefrontal lobe function (Burgess et al., 2001, 2003; den Ouden et al., 2005)
The nature and magnitude of this impairment is fully explained in paper 3 via fMRI due
to mainly hypoactivation of prefrontal cortex esp. (BA10) area that play a crucial role in the
storage and self-initiation of PM intentions. Other brain areas showed activation abnormities
and clarified the impairments in attention control and allocations, future intention encoding
and maintenance, as well as motivations as explained above in paper 3.
Paper 2 by using ERPs demonstrated that PM deficit in symptomatically remitted male
schizophrenic patients characterized by a selective deficit in retrospective component
(intention retrieval) of PM (reduction only in the amplitude of prospective positivity
amplitude component but N300 is reliable that link to cue detection component). That is
distinct from acute episode of schizophrenia patients in paper 1 characterized by impairments
in both cue detection and intention retrieval.
Although paper 1used event and time-based PM tasks, as compared to paper 2 and paper
3 which only used event-based PM tasks. The results of time-based PM task could have been
explained better using ERPs or fMRIs. However, since only the event-based PM task was
involved in the paper 2 and paper 3, it is difficult to determine whether or not results should
be generalized to include the time-based PM. Especially Ordemann et al. (2014) suggests that
2
prospective memory assignments cannot be considered as similar ones because of the
enormous difference in time- and event-based PM.
Paper 1 and paper 3 used a combination of male and female patients but none investigated
potential sex differences with respect to the disorder itself. Paper 2 used only male as
symptomatically remitted patients which makes it unclear whether or not the results should
be generalized to include females as well. Ochoa et al. (2012) presupposes the importance of
gender in several aspects of schizophrenia.
Paper 2 and paper 3 used a considerably small sample size as compared to paper 1, which
could have confounded the results.
Together, all three research papers contributed to find that PM impairment was
generally impaired in patients with schizophrenia and/or symptomatically remitted
schizophrenic patients. However, using only behavioral methods couldn’t give as significant
results as using ERP or fMRI. This suggested a combination of these methods could be used
in the current research to get more concrete results. This review allows clinicians to
understand the intricacies of PM with regards to schizophrenia to devices proper treatment
management and strategies.