Supreme Court Daily Cause List 22-07-2025
Supreme Court Daily Cause List 22-07-2025
[SERVICE/COMPLIANCE]-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
6 Crl.A. No. 4239/2024 DILIP KUMAR AND ORS. AJAY KUMAR TALESARA
II [P-1]
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL
[R-1], RASHMI SINGH [R-2]
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 22-07-2025
Registrar Court No. 1
7 Crl.A. No. 967/2024 RAJA CHITHAMBARAM M.P. PARTHIBAN
II-C
Versus
THE STATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF [Link] [R-1]
POLICE
11 SLP(C) No. 17454/2022 RAGHBIR SINGH (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH DEVESH PRATAP SINGH
IV-B LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS.
Versus
THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. AKSHAY AMRITANSHU [R-1],
[R-2], [R-3]
[Only SLP(C) No. 5016/2025 & 7951/2024 are
listed under this item]
18 SLP(C) No. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. PURNIMA KRISHNA
20777-20779/2023
XII
Versus
C. RAJENDRAN AND ORS. BALAJI SRINIVASAN [R-1],
[R-2], [R-5], [R-9], [R-10],
[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14],
[R-15], [R-21], [R-22], [R-23],
[R-25], [R-27], [R-29], [R-31],
a [R-32], [R-33], [R-35],
[R-50], [R-51], [R-54], [R-63],
[R-67], [R-68], [R-70], RAJAN
NARAIN [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],
[R-17], [R-20], [R-24], [R-28],
a [R-30], [R-34], [R-36],
[R-40], [R-41], [R-44], [R-45],
[R-46], [R-47], [R-48], [R-55],
[R-58], [R-59], [R-60], [R-61],
[R-62], [R-64], [R-66],
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 22-07-2025
Registrar Court No. 1
a [R-69], [R-71], [R-76], M.P.
PARTHIBAN [CAVEAT],
[R-16], [R-18], [R-19], [R-26],
[R-37], [R-38], [R-39], [R-49],
[R-52], [R-53], [R-56], [R-57],
a [R-65], [R-73], [R-74],
[R-75], [R-78], [R-79], [R-80],
[R-82], [R-85], [R-86], [R-87],
[R-88], [R-89], [R-90], [R-91],
[R-92], [R-93], [R-94],
a [R-95], [R-96], [R-97],
[R-98], [R-101]
22 Diary No. 52260-2023 BEN AGRO AND DIARY FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED M.P. PARTHIBAN
XII AND ORS.
Versus
BALASUBRAMANIAN AND ORS. K. PAARI VENDHAN [R-1],
[R-2], A VELAN [R-4], [R-5]
28 Diary No. 19326-2024 THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. ABHISHEK GAUTAM
XIV
Versus
PURAN CHAND
37 Diary No. 40820-2024 THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. AKSHAY AMRITANSHU
IV-B
Versus
ASI JAGPAL SINGH AND ORS. PREETI SINGH [CAVEAT],
[R-4], [R-11], [R-16], [R-19]
40 SLP(C) No. 24630/2024 LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. SHASHANK SINGH
XI
Versus
AKHILESH BEHARI SRIVASTAVA AND ORS. SIDDHARTHA SINHA
[CAVEAT]
IA No. 238478/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 11054/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 238475/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 276250/2024 - MODIFICATION OF COURT
ORDER
IA No. 11055/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
62 SLP(C) No. 15639/2025 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. NATASHA DALMIA
XIV
Versus
GOPAL SINGH PRAGATI NEEKHRA [R-1]
69 SLP(C) No. RAOSAHEB HARIBHAU BHOSALE AND ORS. SAGAR PAHUNE PATIL
13516-13517/2025
IX
Versus
SHIVAJI BABURAO SHINDE AND ORS. DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR
[CAVEAT]
NEW DELHI
17-07-2025 16:44:35
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 22-07-2025
Registrar Court No. 2
SH. MASHROOR ALAM KHAN, REGISTRAR
(TIME : 10:30 AM)
MISCELLANEOUS HEARING
Petitioner/Respondent
SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent
Advocate
2 Diary No. 14806-2025 VINAY KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR DWIVEDI
X
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
FOR WITHDRAWAL
IA No. 147265/2025 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE /
APPLICATION
[SERVICE/COMPLIANCE]-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
6 C.A. No. 4433/2025 CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HUMAN RESOURCES) PALLAVI SHARMA
III
Versus
DNYNESHWAR UMAJI BELE AND ORS.
8 SLP(C) No. 30101/2024 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AMRENDRA KUMAR MEHTA
IV-B
Versus
KULWINDER SINGH AND ORS. RAHUL KHURANA [R-3]
10 T.P.(C) No. 3182/2024 SAVITRI KUMARI DANGI ALIAS KUMARI SAVITRY SATISH KUMAR
XVII
Versus
DEVENDRA KUMAR
27 SLP(C) No. 4728/2025 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY NITEEN KUMAR SINHA
XVII-A LTD.
Versus
M/S. KAY VEE ENTERPRISES
31 SLP(C) No. 13281/2025 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY NITEEN KUMAR SINHA
IX LIMITED
Versus
PURANCHAND @ PURANCHANDRA LACHHARAM
RATHOD AND ORS.
49 SLP(C) No. 6238/2025 RAJENDRA BABU AWALE AND ORS. K. KRISHNA KUMAR
IX
Versus
LANKABAI KRISHNA BIBE AND ORS. ADITI ANIL DANI [R-1], [R-2],
[R-3], [R-13], [R-14]
IA No. 46415/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 46413/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
51 SLP(C) No. 4934/2025 M/S V K KAMAT AND CO. AND ANR. DCOSTA IVO MANUEL
IX SIMON
Versus
JOSEPH FERNANDES AND ORS. SRIHARSH NAHUSH
BUNDELA [R-1]
52 SLP(C) No. 10831/2025 M/S [Link] NAIDU CHARITIES AND RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY
XII ORS.
Versus
M/S. RAJALAKSHMI GENGTUSAMY CHARITIES AND VIJAY KUMAR [R-1], [R-2],
ORS. LAWFIC [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]
53 SLP(C) No. 10714/2025 MANJULA DEVI AND ORS. ABID ALI BEERAN P
XI-A
Versus
SURESH KUMAR AND ORS.
55 Diary No. 5452-2025 NAGESH BHIMAPPA WADDAR @ MAKTEDAR AND ANURADHA MUTATKAR
IV-A ORS.
Versus
BHIMAPPA NAGAPPA WADDAR @ MAKTEDAR AND NULI & NULI [R-3], [R-4],
ORS. [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],
[R-11], [R-12], [R-14], [R-16],
[R-17], [R-18], [R-20],
DHARMAPRABHAS LAW
ASSOCIATES
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 22-07-2025
Registrar Court No. 2
a [R-21], [R-22], [R-23],
[R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27],
[R-28], [R-30], [R-31], [R-33],
[R-38], [R-39], [R-40], [R-41],
[R-42], [R-43], [R-54]
56 SLP(C) No. 4975/2025 AKOIJAM DEBENDRO SINGH AND ORS. CHANDRIKA PRASAD
XIV MISHRA
Versus
LAIRENJAM MAIPAK SINGH AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH
KUMAR [R-7]
63 SLP(C) No. 8223/2025 MANAGING DIRECTOR, MADHYA PRADESH ROAD J S WAD AND CO
IV-C TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Versus
G.K GUPTA AND ORS. SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU
[R-1]
65 Diary No. 9697-2025 M/S HEPZI ELEVATORS PVT. LTD. HARISHA S.R.
XVII-A
Versus
EAST COST VIJAYAN
IN SLP(C) No. - 1861/2020, IN SLP(C) No. -
1862/2020,
APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE IS
TO BE LISTED BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR.
IA No. 60216/2025 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE /
APPLICATION
77 SLP(Crl) No. 8733/2025 SAURABH GUPTA AND ANR. JUGUL KISHOR GUPTA
II
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
IA No. 142008/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
NEW DELHI
17-07-2025 16:44:59
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 22-07-2025
Registrar Court No. 2
MRS. KAVERI, REGISTRAR
(TIME : 2:30 PM)
MISCELLANEOUS HEARING
Petitioner/Respondent
SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent
Advocate
[SERVICE/COMPLIANCE]-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
NEW DELHI
17-07-2025 16:47:38
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR
Filing exemptions, like in Diary No. 9097-2025, can influence legal outcomes by streamlining administrative tasks and facilitating faster court accessibility. However, the reduced formal documentation might limit detailed legal scrutiny and could potentially affect the accuracy of judicial decisions if vital evidence or details are insufficiently reviewed .
Filing for modification of court orders, as in SLP(C) No. 24630/2024, introduces complexities by reopening decisions for reassessment or alteration. This can address errors or accommodate new facts but might complicate proceedings by creating additional layers for judicial review, requiring careful balance between correcting oversights and maintaining legal finality .
Ex-parte stay orders, as seen in T.P.(C) No. 2503/2024, provide immediate relief to one party by suspending adverse proceedings without the other party's input. While this can protect the applicant’s interests quickly, it might unfairly disadvantage the opponent who is unable to contest the decision at the preliminary stage, challenging the principle of fair trial .
Exemptions from filing objection texts (O.T.), as in T.P.(C) No. 3031/2024, may streamline judicial processes by reducing procedural burden. However, this can impede comprehensive case analysis where objection content is integral for dispute resolution, affecting fairness and completeness of the legal proceedings if not counterbalanced by alternative documentation .
Exemptions from filing certified copies (C/C) and original texts (O.T.) in legal appeals, such as in case SLP(C) No. 24630/2024, may expedite proceedings by reducing procedural delays. However, these exemptions can impact the comprehensiveness of document verification and might raise issues related to the transparency and rigor of judicial review .
Stay applications, such as in T.P.(C) No. 3312/2024, hold significant judicial and procedural importance as they temporarily halt proceedings to reassess certain aspects or existing orders, thus preventing potentially irreversible changes. This tool offers courts the opportunity to ensure that justice is not compromised while maintaining procedural integrity during the review or appeal processes .
Legislative exemptions, as applied in IA applications such as in SLP(C) No. 15899/2025, can alter appeal trajectories by lifting the burden of procedural strictures like additional document requirements. This facilitates quicker judicial reviews but may also impact the thoroughness of evidential evaluation if not carefully managed .
The involvement of multiple respondents, as in Diary No. 5452-2025, can complicate case dynamics by requiring the coordination of various legal strategies and responses. This might lead to more comprehensive but lengthier proceedings, as each party's arguments and interests need to be duly considered and accommodated, potentially affecting litigation timelines and resource allocations .
The legal challenges faced by state entities, as illustrated in case SLP(C) No. 14819/2025, typically involve handling lawsuits questioning their policies or administrative actions. These challenges can arise from decisions impacting public goods or regulations, requiring the state to justify its actions within the legal frameworks. Such situations reflect the complex balance between governance and accountability demands .
Condonation of delay in filing applications, such as in T.P.(C) No. 3505/2024, allows for flexibility in legal proceedings by acknowledging circumstances beyond control that might have prevented timely filings. This might facilitate fair trial processes but could also potentially delay overall case resolutions if misused .