NAME: RUSSEL MAY O.
SALCEDA
HYPOTHESIZED MODEL
SAMPLE SYNTAX FOR SEM ANALYSIS
#Latent
A =~ A1+A5
B =~ B2+B4
C =~ C2+C3
D =~ D1+D4+D5
#Regression
B~A+C+D
C~A
Results
Structural Equation Modeling
Model fit
Baseline test
AIC BIC n χ² df p
Model 1 69 6.943 22 0.999
Note. Baseline tests based on scaled and shifted test-statistic.
Additional fit measures
Fit indices
Index Value
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) 1.000
T-size CFI NaN
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) 1.029
Bentler-Bonett Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI) 1.029
Bentler-Bonett Normed Fit Index (NFI) 0.992
Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) 0.606
Bollen's Relative Fit Index (RFI) 0.987
Bollen's Incremental Fit Index (IFI) 1.017
Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI) 1.018
Note. T-size CFI is computed for α = 0.05 . The T-size equivalents of the conventional CFI
cut-off values (poor < 0.90 < fair < 0.95 < close) are poor < 0.725 < fair < 0.812 < close for
model: Model 1.
Information criteria
Value
Log-likelihood
41.00
Number of free parameters
0
Akaike (AIC)
Bayesian (BIC)
Sample-size adjusted Bayesian
(SSABIC)
Other fit measures
Metric Value
Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) 0.000
RMSEA 90% CI lower bound 0.000
RMSEA 90% CI upper bound 0.000
RMSEA p-value 1.000
T-size RMSEA NaN
Standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) 0.061
Hoelter's critical N (α = .05) 333.268
Hoelter's critical N (α = .01) 395.608
Goodness of fit index (GFI) 0.996
McDonald fit index (MFI) 1.117
Expected cross validation index (ECVI)
Note. T-size RMSEA is computed for α = 0.05 . The T-size equivalents of the conventional
RMSEA cut-off values (close < 0.05 < fair < 0.08 < poor) are close < 0.117 < fair < 0.139 <
poor for model: Model 1.
Parameter estimates
Factor Loadings
95% Confidence
Interval
Std. z-
Latent Indicator Estimate p Lower Upper
Error value
A A1 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000
< .00
A5 1.253 0.132 9.518 0.995 1.512
1
Factor Loadings
95% Confidence
Interval
Std. z-
Latent Indicator Estimate p Lower Upper
Error value
B B2 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000
< .00
B4 0.801 0.139 5.774 0.529 1.073
1
C C2 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000
C3 0.316 0.121 2.606 0.009 0.078 0.554
D D1 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000
< .00
D4 0.901 0.085 10.647 0.735 1.067
1
< .00
D5 1.065 0.102 10.422 0.865 1.266
1
Regression coefficients
95% Confidence
Interval
z-
Outco Predict Estim Std.
valu p Lower Upper
me or ate Error
e
- - -
1337.9 0.97 2573.8
B A 48.45 0.03 2670.7
23 1 24
7 6 38
-
- 0.66
C 1.914 0.43 -4.591 2.912
0.840 1
9
D 34.84 927.06 0.03 0.97 - 1851.8
6 9 8 0 1782.1
Regression coefficients
95% Confidence
Interval
z-
Outco Predict Estim Std.
valu p Lower Upper
me or ate Error
e
76 68
8.23 < .00
C A 1.111 0.135 0.847 1.375
8 1
Factor variances
95% Confidence Interval
z-
Variable Estimate Std. Error p Lower Upper
value
< .00
A 0.389 0.069 5.664 0.255 0.524
1
B 5.779 155.004 0.037 0.970 -298.023 309.581
C 0.307 0.671 0.457 0.647 -1.008 1.621
< .00
D 0.813 0.106 7.669 0.605 1.020
1
Factor covariances
95% Confidence Interval
z-
Variables Estimate Std. Error p Lower Upper
value
A-D 0.564 0.061 9.294 < .001 0.445 0.683
Residual variances
95% Confidence Interval
Variabl z-
Estimate Std. Error p Lower Upper
e value
A1 0.611 0.000 0.611 0.611
A5 0.388 0.000 0.388 0.388
B2 0.438 0.000 0.438 0.438
B4 0.639 0.000 0.639 0.639
C2 0.213 0.000 0.213 0.213
C3 0.921 0.000 0.921 0.921
D1 0.187 0.000 0.187 0.187
D4 0.341 0.000 0.341 0.341
D5 0.078 0.000 0.078 0.078
Path diagram
Path diagram
MODIFIED MODEL
Results
Model fit
Baseline test
AIC BIC n χ² df p
Model 1 69 0.616 1 0.433
Note. Baseline tests based on scaled and shifted test-statistic.
Path diagram