THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE LIFE COURSE
UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HS 3610-01 – AY2025-T5
June 25, 2025
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE LIFE COURSE
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE
LIFE COURSE
Human development is shaped by a dynamic interplay of biological, psychological, and
sociocultural factors that influence how individuals grow, adapt, and make decisions throughout
their lives (Heckhausen, Wrosch, & Schulz, 2010). In their motivational theory of lifespan
development, Heckhausen, Wrosch, and Schulz explore how individuals strive for control
through two strategies: primary control (changing the environment to fit one’s needs) and
secondary control (adjusting the self to accommodate external constraints) (Heckhausen et al.,
2010). A critical element of their argument is the role of culture in shaping both types of control,
which in turn influences developmental trajectories across the life course (Heckhausen et al.,
2010). Drawing from this theory and the readings by Harris and McDade, and Bernardi et al.,
this paper argues that culture significantly mediates human development by shaping control
strategies, health behaviors, and developmental expectations at each stage of life (Harris &
McDade, 2018; Bernardi, Huinink, & Settersten, 2019).
Culture and Control Strategies
Culture shapes the meaning and value attached to different forms of control (Heckhausen
et al., 2010). Heckhausen et al. note that in Western, individualistic cultures, primary control is
often prioritized (Heckhausen et al., 2010). Individuals are encouraged to assert autonomy,
pursue personal goals, and shape their environments to fit their desires (Heckhausen et al., 2010).
In contrast, collectivist cultures, often found in parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin America,
emphasize interdependence and harmony (Heckhausen et al., 2010). Here, secondary control
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE LIFE COURSE
strategies such as adapting to social roles, aligning personal goals with group expectations, and
showing resilience in the face of constraints are more culturally endorsed (Heckhausen et al.,
2010).
This cultural shaping of control has real-life implications for human development. For
example, in Western societies, adolescence is seen as a period for identity formation and
increasing autonomy, which aligns with the primacy of primary control (Heckhausen et al.,
2010). Conversely, in collectivist contexts, adolescence may be more focused on fulfilling
familial obligations and preparing for interdependent adult roles, thereby reinforcing secondary
control (Heckhausen et al., 2010). These cultural expectations not only shape how individuals
approach challenges but also influence their psychological well-being and sense of life
satisfaction across the life course (Heckhausen et al., 2010).
The Biosocial Context of Human Development
Harris and McDade further reinforce the idea that human development is embedded in
cultural and social contexts (Harris & McDade, 2018). Their biosocial approach integrates
biological processes with social environments, emphasizing that culture affects health behaviors,
stress regulation, and developmental outcomes (Harris & McDade, 2018). Social relationships,
norms, and values—deeply rooted in cultural traditions—play a critical role in shaping how
individuals navigate key life transitions, such as puberty, parenthood, and aging (Harris &
McDade, 2018).
The presence or absence of supportive relationships can influence whether an individual
engages in proactive or accommodative control strategies (Harris & McDade, 2018). A culture
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE LIFE COURSE
that values community support may foster stronger resilience through secondary control,
especially during health crises (Harris & McDade, 2018). Meanwhile, cultures that promote self-
reliance may place stress on individuals to maintain control in challenging circumstances,
potentially impacting their mental and physical health (Harris & McDade, 2018). The biosocial
perspective thus complements Heckhausen’s theory by showing how culture mediates not only
control strategies but also physiological and behavioral health across time (Harris & McDade,
2018).
The Life Course Cube and Cultural Patterns
Bernardi, Huinink, and Settersten offer another valuable framework through their "Life
Course Cube," which conceptualizes human development along three dimensions: individuals,
institutions, and time (Bernardi et al., 2019). Culture plays a critical role in each of these
dimensions (Bernardi et al., 2019). For example, institutions such as education, labor markets,
and family systems are deeply embedded within cultural traditions and serve as both enablers
and constraints on individual agency (Bernardi et al., 2019). Cultural norms dictate when it is
appropriate to start a family, enter the workforce, or retire—decisions that are central to one's
development (Bernardi et al., 2019).
The Life Course Cube highlights how individuals interpret and respond to institutional
structures differently depending on their cultural background (Bernardi et al., 2019). For
example, a young adult in Kenya may feel culturally compelled to support their extended family
financially before pursuing higher education, while someone in Germany may prioritize
academic advancement as a normative path (Bernardi et al., 2019). These variations underscore
how deeply culture shapes not only personal aspirations and control strategies but also the
broader timing and rhythm of life course transitions (Bernardi et al., 2019).
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE LIFE COURSE
Conclusion
Culture is a powerful force that influences human development across the life course. As
demonstrated by Heckhausen et al., cultural values shape the preference for primary versus
secondary control strategies, which in turn influence how individuals navigate life challenges
(Heckhausen et al., 2010). Harris and McDade’s biosocial model emphasizes that cultural norms
affect health and behavior (Harris & McDade, 2018), while Bernardi et al. show that cultural
contexts frame institutional opportunities and constraints (Bernardi et al., 2019). Together, these
perspectives underscore the necessity of understanding development not just as an individual
psychological process but as a socially and culturally embedded phenomenon. As we continue to
explore human development, a culturally responsive and context-aware lens remains essential.
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE LIFE COURSE
References
Bernardi, L., Huinink, J., & Settersten Jr, R. A. (2019). The life course cube: A tool for studying
lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 41, 100258.
[Link]
Harris, K. M., & McDade, T. W. (2018). The biosocial approach to human development,
behavior, and health across the life course. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of
the Social Sciences, 4(4), 2–26. [Link]
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of lifespan development.
Psychological Review, 117(1), 32–60.
[Link]