Discuss

1. Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a
successful career, while other believe that it is better to get a job straight after
school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a growing belief that continuing to study at a university or college will
be the best way to guarantee a successful career, while others contend that working
right after school is a better option. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the
former perspective as more compelling reasons supporting it outweigh the possible
argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because working straight after graduation is beneficial in some ways. This is
particularly true for young people will be earn money as soon as possible, and since
they will likely be mature enough, they will be able to live independently on their own
income. This subsequently leads to improving personality in their life. A further point
to make is that a person who choose to get a job instead of pursuing higher education
is likely to progress rapidly in their career. This may help them to obtain a lot of real
experience and skills in their chosen profession. ….
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that pursuing higher
education bring a positive impact on student. As an illustration, a college education
prepares young people to meet higher-level qualifications, which is what most
employers expect these days. University graduates usually get a much higher salary
than those without a university education. Another reason behind my belief is that
having a qualification degree could have individuals climb a career ladder at ease. For
example, in Viet Nam, students who graduate with an engineering degree are highly
paid and have an easy time getting a good job. This situation there for influence as
hundreds of applicants often chase the top jobs.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
second, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that studying at
university or college is the best way to get a better career.
 2. Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Other
think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views
and give your opinion.
There is a growing belief that some essential measures should be applied to
control noise while others contend that they have freedom to make noise as they like.
In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the former perspective as more compelling
reasons supporting outweigh the possible argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debates, the second conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because many people feel more comfortable and free when creating noise from
different activities while working or entertaining. As an illustration, turning the
volume louder to enjoy favourite songs makes them feel relaxed after a long busy
days. This subsequently leads to disturbing their next-door neighbours. A further point
to make is that people often consider noise as a part of the industrialization and
modernization process, therefore it is unavoidable. This is clearly evident visible in
urban area, where the traffic noise or engine noise seems to have become more
familiar to people. As a result, they feel that there are no particular reason to control
noise.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that it is more
beneficial to impose some laws to strictly control noise. This is particularly true for
people who cannot sleep at night because of intrusive sounds from a nearby industrial
zone. This subsequently leads to a deterioration in their mental and physical health for
a long term. Another reason behind my belief that the productivity of work may be
reduced as a consequence of noise. For example, white-collar worker requiring a
sufficient sleep cannot fully concentrate on their tasks because of the constant noise
from vehicles in the street. This situation therefor worse the quality of work.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
second viewpoint, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea of posing
some strict punishment on noise.
 3. Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best
academic results, while other believe that it is more important to reward
student who show improvement. Discuss both views and give your own
opinion.
There is growing belief that only students achieving the highest grades deserve
reward, others contend that it is essential to reward student who show improvement.
In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter perspective as more compelling
reasons supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable largely
because it can create a highly competitive studying at school. This is particularly true
for student who have highest grades, frequently desire to win prize in their curriculum.
As a consequence, school children could be encouraged to put their effort into
studying for the highest scores. A further point to make this is that gifted students who
are outstanding could be given opportunities to nurture their ability. This is clearly
evident visible in the high school in Vietnam, where selects students with the best
results for the extra classes to develop their capabilities. This implication of this is that
students may get involve in national competitions.
In spite of the mentioned arguments, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convincing factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that giving
encouragement to those who make strides in their study result in favourable outcomes.
For instance, instead of feeling disappointed when competing with their top
classmates, students who are recognized for their effort during semesters will feel
motivated if they are rewarded for making significant progress. This subsequently
leads to children receiving an equal chance for reward, rather than only focus on the
highest achiever. Another reason behind my belief is that studying environment are
under pressed for student. As an illustration, several common phenomena which occur
when examinations approach, including pressure, anxiety and cheating, would be
reduced. This implication of this is that school students might gain a deeper insight
into their subject without depression.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the first
viewpoint, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the ideas of encouragement
student who show improvement.
 4. Some people believe famous people’s support toward international aid
organizations draws attention to problems. Others think celebrities make the
problems less importance. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There was a growing belief that well-known people’s involvement in global aid
organization attracts the attention of community, while others contend that their
participation may downplay the significant of problems. In this essay, I am inclined to
agree with the former perspective as more compelling reasons supporting it outweigh
the possible argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be the reasonable
largely because most people frequently consider the main purpose of celebrities’
support as a way to enhance their reputation. This is particularly true for important
people, who try to be involved in as many volunteer projects as possible without any
particularly passion or interest in those to attract the attention of society. The
implication of this is that the public will know these people better. A further point to
make this is that the association with celebrities may trivialize the serious work of
international aid organization. This is true for the focus of the public may be shifted
away from this endeavour to the fame and public image of the celebrity concerned.
Consequently, we sometimes have to question their motives for involvement.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that well-known
people have a huge number of fans who are inspired by their actions. For example,
when My Tam- a Vietnamese legendary singer- took part in a project to help
underprivileged children in mountainous areas. This situation therefore empowers
thousands of youngsters from her fan clubs to join in this project by donating money
and working as volunteers thanks to her encouragement. Another reason behind my
belief is that celebrities are frequently trusted by both local and international
communities. This clearly evident visible in the poorest areas, where individuals
confronted limited infrastructure and condition, may lead to success in raising the
profile of aid organizations. As a results, more people learn about the projects and
donate money or volunteer to help either practically or in fun-raising.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the
second, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that well-known people’
support attracting many citizens to engage in the volunteer projects.
 5. Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of
a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a growing belief that living in a horizontal city is the best, while others
contend that people prefer to settle in a vertical city. In this essay, I am inclined to
agree with the latter perspective as more compelling reasons supporting it outweigh
the possible argument for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because citizens have to pay less for building service. For instance, if residents
settle in a private house, they may save a great deal of money since they won’t have to
pay for building service. This subsequently contributes to people spending money on
special occasion. A further point to make is that living lower the ground is safer for
inhabitants when emergencies occur. To illustrate, if a fire starts in the home, they can
quickly escape from the dangerous areas because the building is not too high off the
ground and it won’s take much time to leave. As a result, people can be safer due to
living in a horizontal city.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance rooted in the fact that living in vertical
city will create more space for resident. This is particularly true for inhabitant, who
live in high building, have more space for public usage because there will be less land
for residential areas. Therefore, the government would be able to use this land to build
hospitals, schools or places for entertainment. Another reason behind my belief is that
it is much more convenient for individuals. This is clearly evident visible in tall
building, where people are offered a wide rand of goods and services, thanks to
shopping malls and service centre on lower floor. This implication of this is that
people being enhance the quality of life.
In conclusion, despites acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that living in a tall building
is the best way.
 6. Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems.
Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental
problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve the
problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a growing belief that some environmental problems should be tackled
by adopting simpler lifestyle, while other contend that technology bring a positive
impact to solve the problems. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter
perspective as more compelling reasons supporting it outweigh the possible argument
for the former one.
On the one side of the debates, the first conviction appears to reasonable
largely because enjoying life with less sophisticated technology means that people
inflict less damage on the ecosystems on which all living things depend. This is
particularly true for most people, who consume energy through overuse of devices
such as air-conditioning, water heats, and the private car. If they decrease their energy
consumption, this will reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, but this will certainly
involve leading simpler lives. A further point to make this is that the pollution
problems in some areas will be decline thanks to the increasing awareness of people.
For example, in rural areas, organic farmer do not pollute the water or the soil because
they encourage a diversity of plants and wildlife on their farm. This subsequently
contribute to people decreasing the focus on chemical fertilisers and weedkillers.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance rooted in the fact that technological
achievements play a pivotal role in the environmental protection due to apply
renewable energy resource. As an illustrates, countries such as Japan are leading the
way in developing more eco-friendly cars, buses, and lorries. The implication of this is
that global warming will be decrease because of raising the prospect of decreasing
dependence on fossil fuels. Another reason behind my belief is that using advanced
technologies may tackle the sophisticative cleaner progress. For instance, cleaner
technologies, such as waste treatment, are being introduced into many industries. As a
result, technology is enabling plastics and other products to be recycled.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that applying advanced
technologies is the best way to tackle the environmental issues.
 7. Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty,
others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views
and give your opinion.
There is a growing belief that crime may result from individual characteristic
of violence or greed, while others contend that it is largely a consequence of social
issues and poverty. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the former perspective as
more compelling reasons supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the latter
one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because some people believe that an individual who is cruel turns to crime
more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys and girls as
school because they suffer from parental neglect at an early age. The implication of
this is that the juvenile delinquency increase in the future A further point to make this
is that the person having an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law. This is
particularly true for person, who frequently laziness or selfishness, choose to steal
from others instead of working hard to make an honest living. This situation leads to
person breeding future offenders.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance rooted in the fact that there are many
problems in society which might lead to an increasing in crime rate. For example,
unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find
a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over
recent decades. Another reason behind my belief is that the poverty easily lead to a
rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will
tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families. This
situation therefore empowers people to embark on a life of crime.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the
second, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that crime may come
from a society issues and poverty.
 8. Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they
should because it brings advantages for themselves, the company and society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a growing belief that people should work for the same company for the
remainder of their lives, while other contend that experience different occupations is
beneficial to themselves, company and society. In this essay, I am inclined with the
latter perspective as more compelling reasons supporting it outweigh the possible
argument for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because committing one job can ensure financial stability for employees. This
is particularly true for white-collar, who work at one place for a long time, they will
have a stable income and others benefits such as health and social insurance. This
situation leads to people being climbed a career ladder due to their contributions. A
further point to make this is that a company may operate more sustainably if it can
keep the turnover rate minimal. This is clearly evident visible in firm, where appears
to suffer from significant financial loss if their staff leave too often, as they would
have to pay more for recruiting and training processes. Therefore, enterprise affect its
reputation, leading to more difficulty in attracting talented workers and maintaining a
strong workforce, which is a key factor for the healthy development of an
organization.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance rooted in the fact that switching to a
different job keeps employees busy and helps them develop a broader knowledge base
and learn new skills. As an illustration, when a person starts a new job, he is kicked
out of his comfort zone and forced to learn new systems, new routines, new names,
and new people’s skills. The implication of this is that worker will flexibility and
willingness to enter the unknown will be an asset to companies. Another reason
behind my belief is that people who switch job frequently easily seek a higher income.
Because it is difficult to significantly increase the annual salary while staying at the
same company because a wage raise is usually calculated as a percentage of the base
salary. Therefore, employees often switch between jobs to enjoy such financial gain.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that that experience
different occupations is beneficial to themselves, company and society.
 9. Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school
students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their
teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the
classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that high school students should be free to evaluate and
criticise their educators has evolved into a major topic of concern, while others
contend that disrespect and indiscipline are an unavoidable outcomes of this approach.
In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the former perspective as more compelling
reasons supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because enabling students to judge may undermine students’ sense of respect
and discipline. This is particularly true for children in high school, who are generally
immature and inexperienced. Therefore, some of them tend to lose their temper and
overreact each time they are disciplined by teachers. A further point to make this is
that the problem can be further exacerbated when all the students see their peers
criticising the teachers. As an illustration, they may think of such action as the right
way to behave and start to imitate it. The implication of this is that the respect for
teachers may therefore be lost, which means the classroom learning environment may
be detrimentally affected.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance rooted in the fact that thanks to making
comments or even criticism of their teacher are likely to broaden children’ horizon.
For instance, the core of education is to serve students and equip them with more
knowledge, thus, understanding their insight and needs are critical to being a
successful educator. Therefore, teachers could refine their methods and make
adjustments to their lesson plans to better suit their students, resulting in more
educated and motivated learners. Another reason behind my belief is that this
development could help teachers to hone their pedagogical skills. This is particularly
true for the teachers, who are forced to alter their teaching methods. This subsequently
contributes to they encountering more innovative approaches, and become more
flexible in dealing with special cases in the classroom.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of
the first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that making a comment
in classroom may bring a positive impact for children.
 10. Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as
they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of
freshwater. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that freshwater usage should be accessible for people
to consume as much as they wish, while others contend that the government must
regulated the use freshwater. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter
perspective as more compelling reasons supporting it outweigh the possible argument
for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because fresh water is a basic human requirement for everyday activities and
should be given at no cost. For example, different functions, such as drinking,
washing clothing, bathing, and so on, are basic necessities for every individual
without which they would perish. Therefore, the water supply should be within reach
of every ordinary person for personal and domestic uses. A further point to make this
is that people have varying needs for water so restricting the amount of water used to
an average number, such as people involved in farming activities. This subsequently
leads to bring disadvantageous to those whose businesses involve heavy water usage.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance rooted in the fact that authorities should
impose some restrictions on freshwater management because water is a limited
resource and is threatened by human industrial activities and climate change. If
governments do not step in to control the process of safe water delivery, people might
take it for granted. The implication of this is that the water supply will soon be
exhausted. Another reasons behind my belief that people may procure water from
unregulated sources that are dangerous to individuals and communities. To tackle this,
over many centuries, governments charged citizens to gather and deliver water, which
covered the costs of maintaining the water system. This situation contributes to
ensuring safety standards for drinking-water quality.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of
the first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that freshwater usage
should be regulated by the government.
 11. Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability. Others
believe that there are more important factors. Discuss both views and give
your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that sportspeople’s dominance of their games to their
physical capability, while other contend that there are some factors contribute to their
success. In this essay, I am inclined with the latter perspective as more compelling
reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because sports are initially invented to highlight physical abilities like speed,
strength, and stamina. For instance, in a football game, the team with players that are
physically able to cover more ground faster. This subsequently contributes to they
having an opportunity to achieve a higher score. A further point to make is that having
stamina is the capacity to sustain prolonged physical effort. This is particularly true
for the basketball players, who are expected to keep running in order to maintain the
pace of the game till the end. Therefore, physical skills are very essential in becoming
outstanding in sport.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that they would not
be able to achieve their goal if they did not possess requisite skills which are needed in
sports. As an illustrate, self-discipline is one of the essential skills that sports players
need in their training period. The implication of this is that they can develop
themselves to catch up with their rivals. Another reason behind my belief is that
maintaining strict self-discipline during training not only aids them in being more
organized, but also boosts their confidence through acquired skills. This situation
therefore achieve accomplish and succeed in many sports by their appropriate skills.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the first,
there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that achieving the goals due to
more factors.
 12. Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about the news.
However, others believe that they can learn the news more effectively through
other media. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that newspaper are good sources for collecting and
gathering information, while other contend that the internet is the best source for
better information. In this essay, I am inclined with the latter perspective as more
compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because traditional printed newspaper provide more confidential and factual
information with images and subtitle. This case in point is the newspaper, which
provide information in various sections and are well structures, such as is happening
in the surrounding area, horoscope, sports, film industry, and many more. This
subsequently contributes to resident staying informed about the current event. A
further point to make it is that it is bring a convenient for people in all of age
accessing the news. This is particularly true for elder people, who are not comfortable
with electronic gadgets for watching news. The implication of this is that they can
utilize their time by reading this kind of magazine at their homes without searching.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due
to more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that reading the
new on internet help people can access vast information from news sources from
around the world. As an illustrate, online news offers multimedia content, including
videos, and interactive features for enhancing the number of readers. This situation
therefore make the news more accessible and captivating. Another reason behind my
belief is that online news is accessible to anyone, regardless of their income and
location. This is clearly evident visible in remote or underserved areas, which people
cannot afford to pay for a newspaper subscription to stay informed about current
news. Therefore, people could gain a deeper insight about information about the
occurrence of world.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the
first viewpoint, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that keep
informed about the news, learning news via other media is wiser owing to its above-
mentioned benefits.
 13. Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary
employees do. Some people believe it is necessary, but others think that it is
unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions.
There is a growing belief that directors of enormous organizations should
receive much higher wages than ordinary laborers, while other contend that it is unfair
for them. In this essay, I am inclined with the former perspective as more compelling
reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the latter one.
On the one side the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because the equality of salaries is super important to encourage workers and
increase working productivity. This is clearly evident visible in the large enterprise,
where the concentration of wealth at the top of organizations without investment in
employee development and well-being. The implication of this is that ordinary
employees are more likely to engage in illegal activities in order to earn extra money
to provide for their family members and themselves. A further point to make this is
that increasing the wages of only directors or top workers may lead to a lack of a
professional workforce for companies. As an illustrate, organizations and companies
may not be able to attract many talented employees due to unfair salary distribution.
This subsequently contributes to labours could seek other places where their
knowledge and talents are going to be valued and rewarded.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that directors of
companies should get higher salaries because of their responsibility and long- term
decision to organize. For example, companies and governmental organizations usually
offer director status to those who already have more practical and theoretical
experience and knowledge in their majors compared to ordinary worker. As a result,
the company have the highest position in the labour competition job market. Another
reason behind my belief is that the higher salary reflects the level of risk they assume
and incentivizes them to make sound decisions that drive performance and growth.
This is particularly true for directors, who are often exposed to greater risks and
uncertainties in their roles. Therefore, their decisions can have a significant impact on
the company's financial stability and reputation.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the
second, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that compensating more
directors and top workers to make improvements easily and effectively.
 14. Many companies today sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves.
Some people think that this is a good thing for the world of sports. Others think
this has disadvantages. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that supporting sports activities as a positive way to
advertise their products and services and improve health and sports spirit in
workplaces, while other content with sponsoring sports can decrease companies'
image and cause employees to neglect their duties. In this essay, I am inclined with
the former perspective as more compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible
argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to largely because One of
the most noticeable ones is that some sports teams and sports events endorse bad
products or services which may cause negative impacts on customers. As an illustrate,
in the English Prime League, various firms specialized in gambling and alcoholic
beverages pay money to have their band names and logos printed on players' kits. This
subsequently leads to young people exposing to harmful advertisements with these
products and start using them. A further point to make this is that the participation of
businesses in sports sponsorship may cause unethical practices such as unfair the
score. This case in point is companies sponsor sports teams, which they will want their
teams to win at any price and they even buy out players of rival. The implication of
this is that unethical practice can damage the meaning of sports.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to more
convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that this approach can
improve the public's awareness of companies' images. For example, global sports
competitions such as The Olympic Games and Football World Cup attract a large
number of followers. The implication of this is that financing these events can be a
good way for businesses to introduce themselves to their customers. Another reason
behind my belief is that the company sponsor sport would create more job offer for
their athlete. To illustrate, the involvement of businesses in sports allows athletes to
become brand ambassadors and earn more money outside their main occupations. This
situation therefore motivates them to keep training to maintain the world-class
performance which entertains their fans.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the second,
there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that companies has become a
prevalent practice in the world of sports.
 15. Some people think students should study the science of food and how to
prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important
subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
There is a growing belief that students should concentrate more on essential
subjects, while others contend that youngsters ought to learn cooking skill and gain
knowledge about nutrition. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter
perspective as more compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument
for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable largely
because learning food science and its preparation equips students with crucial skills
that facilitate their independent university life. For instance, good food preparation and
cooking skills aid students in overcoming obstacles without parental assistance.
Therefore, they can adapt better to a new living environment, starting with the most
basic need. A further point to make is that by having a solid understanding of
nutrition, students can set up a healthy and balanced diet, which will greatly benefit
their physical health. As an illustration, youngsters might combine and preserve their
meals appropriately. As a result, the ensures the well-being of their digestive system
as well as prevents them from food-related problems such as obesity and food
poisoning.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that it must be
acknowledged that core subjects hold greater importance in education in order to
shaping a solid foundation, enabling them to pursue their undergraduate program
successfully. The case in point is natural subjects, which foster students' critical
thinking and problem-solving skills, while social ones help students develop their
communication and interpersonal skills. Therefore, it is crucial for students to
prioritise main academic disciplines in order to grasp their strengths and aptitudes
better so they can make informed decisions about their future careers. Another reason
behind my belief is that building kitchens for student-use would put a financial burden
on schools. To illustration, they have to spend a lot of money on contributing new
infrastructure and preparing equipment as well as ingredients required to teach. The
implication of this is that students, who would like to take this course, may have to
pay more expensive tuition fee.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that it would be better for
students to devote mainly their time to core subjects.
 16. Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the
countryside. Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities.
Discuss both views and give your opinions.
There is a growing belief that living in urban areas or rural areas contributes
more to a person's ability to maintain a healthy lifestyle, while other contend that
cities offer numerous exercising opportunities and varied healthy diet choices, others
advocate for the health benefits. In this essay I am inclined to agree with the latter
perspective as more compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument
for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because living in the countryside or suburban areas is conducive to a healthy
lifestyle due to the prevalent pollution in urban areas. This is clearly evident visible in
rural areas, where minimizing exposure to risk factors such as water, environmental,
and noise pollution, can avoid various health issues, including physical and mental
ailments for the residents. The implication of this is that Inhaling unpolluted air not
only reduces the risk of respiratory diseases, asthma, and allergies, but also enhances
overall well-being. A further point to make is that rural dwellers have access to
healthier food. As an illustration, rural areas have a wide range of farmland which use
for agricultural, so people have more opportunities to choices the fresher produces,
such as organic produce, and a lower prevalence of fast food and processed meals
compared to urban areas. This subsequently contributes to reducing the risk of
lifestyle-related diseases like cancer and heart disease.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convincing factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that Living in urban
settings provides individuals with a plethora of opportunities to engage in physical
activities and exercise. For instance, cities are typically equipped with fitness centres,
parks, sports facilities, and cycling paths, making it easier for residents to stay active
and fit. This subsequently therefore encourages social interaction, which can boost
motivation levels to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Another reason behind my belief is
that exercising opportunities, cities offer a wide range of health-conscious food
options. For example, urban areas often host farmers' markets, organic stores, and
health-oriented restaurants that cater to diverse dietary preferences. Consequently, this
variety enables individuals to make informed choices about their nutrition and select
fresh, organic produce for balanced meals.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that the excersising and
dietary options that the cities provide can be more advantageous to an individual that
wants to live in healthy manners.

17. Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe
children should be free to do what they want. Discuss both views and give your
opinion?
There is a growing belief that children should have the freedom to choose their own
activities, while other contend that parents should be responsible for selecting
activities based on their child’s interests. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the
former perspective as more compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible
argument for the letter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable largely
because parents have a responsibility to monitor their child’s activities throughout the
day. For instance, if a child is left unsupervised, they may spend their time on the
internet, which can have harmful effects on their health and mental state. Therefore, it
is crucial to control what children do during their free time, as the world is filled with
potential dangers and threats to their well-being. A further point to make is that young
children may get involved in bad habit without the parent’ guidance. As an
illustration, youngsters not have the ability to make appropriate choices for themselves
and may be easily influenced by others, even if the activity is not suitable for their age
or condition. This subsequently leads to disastrous consequences, including physical
and psychological harm.
In spite of the mentioned arguments, I strongly support the first notion due to more
convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that freedom of choice
enables children to develop their unique talents. For instance, children may participate
in extracurricular activities such as sports or music lessons, which can help them
discover and develop their talents. The implication of this is that they can shape the
ability and skill for the career in the future. Another reason behind my belief is that it
is essential for children to have the opportunity to select their own activities to
participate in throughout their free time. To illustration, when children are given the
freedom to choose the activities in which they partake, they are more likely to do so
with excitement and motivation, which ultimately leads to a feeling of success and
fulfillment.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that children should be
allowed to choose their own activities during their free time.
 18. Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their
society. Others, however, believe that young people should be free to behave as
individuals. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that younger generations should follow social customs or
behave independently of these traditions, while other contend that t a person should
behave independently from any social construct. In this essay, I am inclined to agree
with the former perspective as more compelling reason supporting it outweigh the
possible argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable largely
because individuals aged between 16 to 25 possess the cognitive ability to make
independent decisions, irrespective of societal expectations and stereotypes. For
instance, a young person may exhibit optimism one day and pessimism the next. This
implication of this is that they can overcome adversity at ease. A further point to make
is that youngster should be free to behave as individuals because some traditions are
now outdated in modern society. As an illustration, the traditional mindset that women
are responsible for all housework is purely sexist by today’s standards. As a result,
people are fighting for the right to develop based on their judgment.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the first notion due to more
convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that young people should
follow the traditional of their society because most traditions are derived from living
experiences of older generations and were passed down for centuries. This is
particularlt true for a person, who adopts Vietnamese traditional table manners and
politeness, is considered educated and emotionally intelligent. This subsequently leads
to maintaining relationships with one another. Another reason behind my belief is that
following culturally-related traditions help a person shape one’s cultural identity. For
example, many second-generation Vietnamese Americans still celebrate Tet as a way
to identify themselves. Therefore, they can gain a deeper insight into the Vietnam
history and culture throughout over the period.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the first,
there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that young generations should
single out valuable traditions to maintain cultural diversity and simultaneously
incorporate innovation to revolutionize society.
 19. Some people think secondary school student should study international news as
one of their subjects while others believe that this is a waste of a valuable
school time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that international news should be one of the subjects to
learn in secondary school, while other contend that there is no need to spend important
school time learning useless information. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the
former perspective as more compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible
argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because exposing students to the often violent and distressing content
prevalent in current news may adversely impact their behaviour. For instance, they
raise concerns about the proliferation of unsettling news stories, such as graphic
depictions of violence perpetrated by groups like ISIS. This subsequently leads to
potentially inducing feelings of insecurity and prompting biased perceptions among
young individuals. A further point to make is that reading and analysing the news
would probably be a time-consuming activity. This is particularly true for student,
who need to receive more solid background about their academic subject, often is
transmitted to stay inform about the current even. This situation therefore insufficient
time may remain for more important subjects and activities like sciences, math or
physical education.
In spite of the mentioned arguments, I strongly support the first notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that proponents
posit that studying international news can enhance students’ analytical skills,
especially in deciphering complex global scenarios. For instance, by following news
narratives concerning political conflicts between nations, students can observe the
progression and repercussions of such disputes. This situation therefore enables
student to fosters their ability to critically analyse multifaceted situations. Another
reason behind my belief is that advocates of this proposition contend that
understanding international news can significantly enrich students’ overall awareness
and comprehension. As an illustration, news reports cover events and features from
diverse parts of the world. As a result, students are likely to develop a more
comprehensive understanding of global dynamics and cultural differences.
 In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that integration of
international news as a valuable subject for secondary school students.

20. Some people think that it is worth researching different minerals in space.
Others, however, disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a growing belief that exploring minerals in the cosmic realm is
necessary, while other contend that the major obstacles and risks. In this essay, I am
inclined to agree with the former perspective as more compelling reason supporting it
outweigh the possible argument for the latter one.
On the one side of the debate, the second conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because the accessibility of outer space's sources of minerals can be beneficial
due to it have the potential to alleviate the problem of Earth's depleting mineral
supplies. To illustration, asteroids and other celestial bodies are thought to be packed
with precious materials, such as rare earth elements needed for technology and clean
energy. The implication of this is that we may lessen the environmental impact of
terrestrial mining while also easing international conflicts over resource scarcity. A
further point to make is that the technological breakthroughs required for space
extraction may promote innovation, resulting in new sectors and job possibilities. For
example, the study of the composition of asteroids and other celestial bodies can help
us understand how the solar system formed and how life originated. This subsequently
leads to advancements in a variety of scientific domains, including planetary science
and astrobiology.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
due to more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that skeptics
note the enormous hurdles inherent in space mining. As an illustration, the
technological and logistical challenges are considerable, including harsh climates,
huge expenditures, and intricate engineering. This subsequently contributes to
government creating the necessary infrastructure for space mining operations would
necessitate enormous investment with unknown returns, making it a high-risk
endeavour. Another reason behind my belief is that there are also legal and ethical
considerations. For instance, the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 declares space to be the
domain of all humanity, generating concerns regarding space resource ownership and
commercialization. Consequently, without clear international standards, space mining
may result in conflicts and potentially catastrophic environmental effects on celestial
planets.
 In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that striking a balance
between ambition and caution, we can maximize the benefits of space mining while
reducing hazards.

21. Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than humans.
Some say it is a positive development while others say it is a negative
development. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that these machines will surpass humans in intellectual
capabilities bring numerous benefits, while other contend that it is an overall negative
development. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter perspective as more
compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because Super intelligent computers epitomize the pinnacle of human
ingenuity, promising unparalleled opportunities for scientific advancement and
societal progress. For instance, by transcending the cognitive limitations of the human
mind, AI systems possess the capacity to revolutionize scientific discovery and
innovation across an array of disciplines to facilitate extensive research for employees
and help students navigate complex academic tasks. Consequently, this augmentation
of human capabilities through computer assistance enhances overall productivity and
performance. A further point to make is that computers aid in efficiently executing
crucial projects in companies with optimal productivity. As an illustration, in medical
research, advanced computers can analyse complex databases and find solutions much
faster than humans. Therefore, these computers could give more accurately solution to
treatment for people.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to
due to more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact people are at
risk of being dominated by computers. For example, teenagers are increasingly using
Chat-GPT to complete their homework in many countries, thus potentially leading to
the inability to deal with certain tasks without the help of technology. The implication
of this is that our brains may become lazier when processing certain information.
Another reason behind my belief is that artificial intelligence can replace certain jobs,
which makes many people face a risk of job loss. To illustration, the more jobs
computers take over, the more likely these previously-performed-by-human jobs will
be dominated by virtual intelligence. This subsequently leads to people facing more
unemployed workforce.
 In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that managed appropriately
and utilized, robots will become powerful tools that can boost the economy, given the
improved productivity it offers.

22. Some people say that when deciding how taxes should be spent, governments
should prioritise health care. Other people believe that there are more
important priorities for taxpayers' money. Discuss both these views and give
your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that taxes should be utilized to invest in health care, while
others contend that the government should spend money on other essential social
services. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter perspective as more
compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the frist conviction appears to be reasonable largely
because well-being is fundamental for a nation to develop sustainably. To illustrate, a
good medical system can help not only reduce the mortality rate but also improve the
health standard. As a result, the retirement age may increase and people can contribute
more to economic progress. A further point to make is that investing in health care can
stimulate social equity. This is clearly evident visible in Vietnam, where medical costs
are supported by the government and insurance organizations, low-income people can
be exposed to modern medical services to protect their well-being. This situation
therefore empowers people in every class to access high-quality services at an
affordable fee.
In spite of the mentioned argument, I strongly support the second notion due to due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact the annual taxes can
be used to upgrade the transportation network. For example, after opening and
improving the highways to other nearby cities, this city is usually selected to place the
branches of many multinational companies, opening many jobs for local people. the
implication of this is that this can facilitate commuting and also stimulate trading
activities, creating more career opportunities for citizens. Another reason behind my
belief is that the government can invest the budget for enhancing the education
system. For instance, education systems across the world largely rely on government
funding derived from taxes. The implication of this is that this funding ensures that
schools are equipped with adequate resources, qualified teachers, and can offer
subsidized or free education to all children, thereby promoting literacy and long-term
economic growth.
 In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that other crucial social
infrastructures such as transportation networks and education systems should be
focused on.

23. Some people argue that we should do research into our family history. Others
agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that delving into the history of one’s family is
essential, while others contend that the notion of giving the present and future
generation precedence. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter perspective
as more compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible argument for the
former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because conducting genealogical research can provide a deeper understanding
of one’s heritage and cultural background. This is particularly true for people, who
have grown up disconnected from their roots, perhaps due to migration or lack of
family record. Therefore, by unearthing the stories of their ancestors, individuals can
reconnect with their cultural identity, fostering a sense of belonging and pride. A
further point to make is that by studying one’s ancestry, people can unveil fascinating
information about their bloodline. This is clearly evident visible in the US, where a
number of people can trace their lineage back to the American Revolution, give them
great stories to share to their descendants, in addition to reinvigorating their
patriotism. This situation therefore could be highly rewarding for future generations,
and the community as a whole.
In spite of the mentioned arguments, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that prioritizing the
current generation and posterity would be more sensible due to help us address
pressing issues and improve the lives of individuals in the here and now. For example,
implementing accessible healthcare services can provide immediate medical
assistance to the current population. This subsequently results in people maintaining
healthier and more productive communities. Another reason behind my belief is that
considering the needs of future generations can motivate us to adopt sustainable
practices and protect natural resources. For instance, investing in renewable energy
sources not only mitigates environmental impact today but also ensures a cleaner and
more sustainable planet for the sake of future generations. As a result, the quality life
can enhance as well as having more the green space for individual living in.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential argument in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that concentrating on
present and upcoming generations would be more fruitful.

24. Many countries have the same shops and products. Some consider it a positive
development, whereas others consider it negative. Discuss both these views
and give your own opinion.
There is a growing belief that more stores and products bear a striking
resemblance to each other has aroused controversy as some people advocate this
trend, while others contend that this development has predominantly positive or
negative effects. In this essay, I am inclined to agree with the latter one as more
compelling reason supporting it outweigh the possible arguments for the former one.
On the one side of the debate, the first conviction appears to be reasonable
largely because it can provide people with high-quality products. This is clearly
evident visible in global brands, where tend to stringent requirements of various
countries, ensuring the quality of their goods. Therefore, citizens have more
opportunities to approach to various produces. A further point to make is that
consumers often have good experiences in multinational stores. For example, staff at
Haidilao, a Chinese hotpot restaurant chain, are required to participate in training at
least once a month. This subsequently results in exceptional customer service.
In spite of the mentioned arguments, I strongly support the second notion due to
more convicting factors. Primarily, my stance is rooted in the fact that supporters of
such a predisposition may argue that it promotes fair competition among shops and
companies. For instance, stores and items that are presents globally are usually owned
be multinational corporations, which have not only greater financial power but also
superior management practices. This situation therefore empowers them to outperform
local companies, possibly underscoring losses for the local economy. Another reason
behind my belief is that global shop and product designs might hinder the promotion
of traditional cultures. To illustrate, these designs tend to be standardized globally,
mostly failing incorporate cultural feature, such as ancient motifs and crafts.
Consequently, local, especially new generations, might have little understanding or
appreciation of their traditional designs.
 In conclusion, despite acknowledging the potential arguments in favour of the
first, there are overwhelming rationales to endorse the idea that this development has
predominantly positive or negative effects.