INTRODUCTION
Every year half of the population face the functional barriers in daily life due to
shoulder pain, which affects their quality of the life as well (Marek & Roll,2017)
The initial review of literature found the following assessments mostly used in
rotator cuff injury. Namely, VAS, ROM, Shoulder special tests like Hawkin’s
test, Neer test, Painful arc test, Jobe test, Drop- arm test, Shoulder Pain and
Disability Questionnaire (SPADI), Tampa Scale of Kinesio phobia (TSK),
Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) test, Nordic Questionnaire. So
all the varieties of standardized and non-standardized assessments are often
used by health professional under the pretext of functional assessments not
specifically used by occupational therapists.
(Mengi and Guler, 2022) (Champagne et. al. 2019)
Research question: What are the different assessments used by the
occupational therapists in the patient with the rotator cuff injury?
AIM AND OBJECTIVE
Aim: To scope and review all the assessments used by the occupational
therapists for the client with rotator cuff injury.
Objectives:
1. To categorize the different assessments according to ADLs, IADLs and
other components mentioned in the Occupational Therapy Practice
Framework, 4th edition.
2. To provide better understanding about occupational therapy functional
assessment.
METHODOLOGY
DATABASES USED KEYWORDS
Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest Occupational therapy AND rotator
cuff injury, functional assessments
AND rotator cuff injury , western
Ontario rotator cuff index AND
rotator cuff injury , occupational
therapy AND rotator cuff tears
INCLUSION CRITERIA EXCLUSION CRITERIA
All articles from January 2013 All non-English articles
to Mid-December 2023. Articles without full text
All articles related to all the review
assessments for rotator cuff
injury.
All the study design will be
considered.
Records identified through
database searching
Identific (n= 4850)
ation
duplicates removed= 96
Records after duplicates
removed
Screenin (n=4754)
g
Records screened Records excluded
(n=4754) (n=4580)
Eligiblity
Full text articles assessed for Full text articles that were
eligibility (n= 174) excluded
(n=135)
Included Studies included
(n=39)