0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views1 page

Proving a Real Number Inequality

The document presents a mathematical problem involving three positive real numbers a, b, and c, and aims to prove a specific inequality. The solution involves rewriting the inequality, applying the AM-GM inequality, and considering two cases based on the discriminant of a quadratic expression. The proof concludes that the inequality holds true under the given conditions.

Uploaded by

Kwin09
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views1 page

Proving a Real Number Inequality

The document presents a mathematical problem involving three positive real numbers a, b, and c, and aims to prove a specific inequality. The solution involves rewriting the inequality, applying the AM-GM inequality, and considering two cases based on the discriminant of a quadratic expression. The proof concludes that the inequality holds true under the given conditions.

Uploaded by

Kwin09
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

[Link].

com

Problem. Let a; b; c be three positive real numbers. Prove that


 
1 1 1 1
.a C b C c 3/ C C 3 C abc C > 2:
a b c abc

(Nguyen Van Huyen)

Solution. (Nguyen Van Huyen) We rewrite the inequality as

.a C b C c 3/.ab C bc C ca 3abc/ C a2 b 2 c 2 C 1 > 2abc:

AG
Group the inequality as a quadratic in terms of a

.b 2 c 2 C b C c 3bc/a2 Œb 2 C 10bc C c 2 3.b C c/.1 C bc/a C bc.b C c/ 3bc C 1 > 0:

By the AM-GM inequality, we have

n_
p
3
b 2 c 2 C b C c > 3 b 2 c 2  b  c D 3bc;
p
3
bc.b C c/ C 1 > 3 b 2 c  bc 2  1 D 3bc:
ye
We consider two cases

(1) If b 2 C 10bc C c 2 > 3.b C c/.1 C bc/; then it is obvious.


hu

(2) If b 2 C 10bc C c 2 6 3.b C c/.1 C bc/; we calculate the discriminant


2
 D b 2 C 10bc C c 2 4.b 2 c 2 C b C c

3.b C c/.1 C bc/ 3bc/Œbc.b C c/ 3bc C 1
D .b 1/2 .c 1/2 Œ4.b C c/.bc C 1/ b2 14bc c2
en

Since
4.b C c/.bc C 1/ b2 14bc c2
y

4Œ3.b C c/.1 C bc/ b2 10bc c2 .b c/2


D C > 0:
gu

3 3
We obtain  6 0:

The proof completed.


N

References

[1] [Link]

You might also like