Legal Aspects of Mutilation Crimes
Legal Aspects of Mutilation Crimes
Mutilation – means lopping or the clipping off of some part of the body. - The penalty of reclusion perpetua is to be
imposed.
2 kinds of Mutilation: - IF NOT CAUSED PURPOSELY and DELIBERATELY,
1. By intentionally mutilating another by depriving him, either the case will fall under Article 263 Par. 1 and Par.
totally or partially, of some essential organ for reproduction. 2.
Properly used for the male, but it also has been used (a) physical ugliness
synonymously with “sterility”.
(b) permanent and definite abnormality, and
Reclusion Pepetua is to be imposed when the victim of SPI under
(c) conspicuous and visible
paragraph 1 is under 12 years of age.
Sacr if covered by a dress or clothes, not conspicuous
Blindness of the of an eye
and visible.
Par. 1 – complete blindness of must be of two eyes. Mere Scar on the upper part of the neck, near the jaw,
weakness of vision is not contemplated. constitutes deformity.
Par. 2 – loss of an eye only. Loss of teeth
o Three incisors – visible deformity
o One incisor – not deformity
PARAGRAPH 2: If visible and has impaired his
appearance, it is deformity.
Loss of power to hear
o Front tooth – not principal
Both ears; if only one eat, it is SPI under par. 3 Deformity by loss of teeth refers to injury which cannot
be repaired by the action of nature. – artificial teeth
Loss of use of hand or incapacity for usual work must be does not repair the injury.
permanent. Loss of both outer ears constitutes deformity and also
All those mentioned in paragraph 2 are principal members of the loss of the power to hear.
body. o If there is a loss of power to hear of both ears as
a result of the loss of both outer ears, crime
punished under par. 2
PARAGPRAH 3: o Loss of the lobule of the ear is deformity
(permanently disfigured).
It covers any member which is not principal member of the body Loss of index and middle finger is either deformity or
(an eye, an arm, leg, a foot) loss of a member (not principal) of his body or use of
Fingers of the hand are not principal members. same
o But if alleged in the information and proved that Loss of power to hear of right ear only is loss od use of
the loss of the use of the three fingers also other part of the body (he may still hear through his left
resulted in the loss of the use of the hand itself, ear)
it is SPI under Par. 2.
INCAPACITY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK QUALIFIED SERIOUS PI
The offended party must have an avocation or work at the If the offense committed against any of the persons enumerated in
time of the injury. parricide and with the attendance of any of the circumstances mentioned in
Work includes studies or preparation for a profession. murder, the law provides higher penalties.
Refers to any kind of labor and does not refer to labor in which the Penalties established by the next preceding chapter shall be
offended party is engaged at the time the SPI are inflicted. applicable here.
Includes both illness and incapacity for labor. o That the offender inflicted upon another any serious PI
If not entirely cured for more than 30 days, it falls under this o That it was done by knowingly administering to him any
paragraph. injurious substance or beverages or by taking advantage of
If the injury requires a medical attendance for more than 30 his weakness of mind or credulity.
days, the illness of the offended party may be considered as o The he had no intent to kill.
lasting for more than 30 days.
Medical attendance is not required in this par. Same with
other paragraphs. It is frustrated when there is intent to kill – the injurious substance
Depends on Evidence beyond reasonable doubt of length of to be considered as poison.
period of illness or incapacity for labor; otherwise, the If the accused did not know of the injurious substance he
offense is only slight physical injury. administered, he is not liable.
Lessening of efficiency due to injury is not incapacity. Throwing mordant chemicals or poisons on the face or upon the
body is not contemplated in this article.
Not applied when the PI are less serious or slight.
“By taking advantage of his weakness of mind and credulity” may
ORDINARY PI vs MUTILCATION
take place in the case of witchcraft, philters (love potion),
Mutilation – must have been caused purposely and deliberately to magnetism.
lop or clip off some part of the body as to deprive the offended party of such
body part.
“Shoot at another”
o With any firearm, without intent to kill.
o If not discharged at a person, no crime of discharge of
firearm.
o Discharged towards the house of victim is not illegal
discharge of firearm.
Firing a gun against the house of the offended party at random, not
knowing in what part of the house the people inside were, is only
alarm under Article 155.
Purpose of this article is only to intimidate or to frighten the
offended party, and no intention to kill.
Intent to kill is negatived by distance of 200 yards between offender
and victim. – the distance is so great that it is difficult to impute an
intention on the part of the offender to kill the offended party.
Successive shots at the offended party and had already killed a
cousin attempted homicide.
Complex crime of illegal discharge of firearm with serious or less
serious PI. (No complex crime when only slight physical injury since
it only constitutes a light felony).
ART. 254 DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS
The crime is discharged of firearm, even if the gun was not pointed ART. 260 RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTIPANTS IN A DUEL
at the offended party when it fired, as long as it was initially aimed
RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTIPANTS IN A DUEL
by the accused at or against the offended party.
Reclusion temporal If any person who shall kill his
o Public officer who fired a revolver in the air in order to
adversary in a duel
capture some gamblers and to prevent them from escaping
Penalty provided for PI Only PI inflicted
no crime Arresto mayor No PI
Accomplices Seconds
Acts punished:
o By killing one’s adversary in a duel
o By inflicting upon such adversary PI
o By making a combat although no PI have been inflicted.
Who are liable?
o Person who killed or inflicted PI upon his adversary, or both
combatants in any other case, as principals.
o Second, as accomplices
Intent to kill is disregarded when only PI are inflicted upon
adversary.
Penalty imposed in Slight PI is Arresto menor.
CHALLENGING TO A DUEL
Prision correccional, minimum Challenge another to a duel, incite
period another to give or accept a
challenge to a duel, scoff at or
decry another publicly for having
refused to accept a challenge to
fight a duel.
Acts punished:
o By challenging another to a duel
o By inciting another to give or accept the challenge to a duel
o By scoffing at or decrying another publicly for having
refused to accept a challenge to a fight a duel.
The person making the challenge must have in mind a formal
combat to be concerted between him and the one challenged in the
presence of two or more seconds.
Offender incite to accept, offended refused Light threats under
Art. 285
Person responsible:
o Challenger
o Instigator