Optimization of a VFD-Driven Deep Well Pump System via PLC

Automation: Design, Implementation, and Efficiency Assessment at

RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory

Chapter 1

Introduction

Background of the Study

Globally, automation in water systems is widely adopted. For example,

variable frequency drives (VFDs) are used to improve energy efficiency in pump

applications by adjusting motor speed to match demand, resulting in significant

power savings (Eaton, n.d.). German utilities widely implement PLC–VFD systems in

municipal and wastewater treatment plants, achieving energy efficiency

improvements of 20–30% through precise process optimization. Japanese utilities

integrate PLC–VFD systems with SCADA and HMI interfaces for real-time

monitoring and diagnostics—enabling precise scheduling and improved reliability”

(Hitachi Energy, n.d.). India’s urban water boards have adopted PLC–VFD solutions

for water distribution networks, resulting in improved energy efficiencies and reduced
maintenance frequency” (Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, 2025). However,

rural and public institutional areas often lag due to budget constraints.

In contrast, many Philippine institutions—including dormitories and schools—

still rely on manual control systems, resulting in inefficient operations and delayed

responses compared to modern, fully automated standards (Philippine Star, 2013).

Reliable access to water is essential in institutional settings like dormitories,

where daily demand is continuous and fluctuating. At RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory,

the current deep well pump system operates manually, leading to delays in pump

response, unnecessary energy consumption, and unreliable water supply. Manual

operations in building and pump systems result in response delays that contribute to

a 5–20% increase in energy consumption compared to automated control (DOE,

2020). These issues highlight the need for automation to improve water supply

reliability and energy efficiency.

This study addresses that gap by proposing a PLC-based control system

integrated with a VFD for RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory’s deep well pump. The

goal is to modernize local practices by aligning them with global standards in

automated water system management, ensuring efficient, reliable, and responsive

operation.

Statement of the Problem

 The deep well pump system at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory is already

equipped with a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) to regulate motor speed and

improve energy efficiency. Without automation, the institution risks continued

inefficiency, higher operating costs, and service disruptions during peak usage. The

absence of an integrated Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) means the system

still relies on manual operations, which limits its responsiveness to fluctuating water

demand and reduces operational efficiency. This lack of automation also increases

the risk of human error, inconsistent water delivery, and unnecessary energy

consumption. While the existing VFD provides a foundation for efficient motor

control, its full potential is not realized without a coordinated control system.

To address these issues, this study aims to develop and implement a PLC-

based control system that will enhance the functionality of the existing VFD-driven

pump through intelligent automation.

This study aims to answer the following questions:

1. How can a PLC be configured to integrate with the existing VFD to automate

the deep well pump based on demand and safety thresholds?

2. What are the effects of PLC automation on the energy consumption and

operational reliability of the deep well pump system?

3. How effective is the proposed control system in preventing over-pumping and

dry run conditions?

Objectives of the Study

This study aims to design and implement a PLC-based control system for the

existing VFD-driven deep well pump at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory, with the goal

of automating its operation and enhancing the efficiency and reliability of the water

supply system.

The following are the project’s specific objectives:

1. To develop ladder logic programming enabling automatic pump control via

PLC-VFD Modbus communication.

2. To evaluate the impact of PLC integration on the water pump system by

measuring key performance indicators such as energy consumption, pump

response time, and reliability in maintaining continuous water supply.

3. To implement IEC 61131-3 compliant control logic and IEC 60335-2-41 safety

measures by integrating motor current monitoring and water-level sensors to

prevent over-pumping and dry-run conditions in the system.

Significance of the Study

This study provides meaningful contributions by introducing an efficient and

automated water pumping solution tailored for institutional settings, offering practical

benefits to a range of stakeholders:

 Students and Staff of RTC-KPVTC Davao. The implementation of an

automated PLC-based control system ensures a more consistent and reliable water

supply, directly benefiting the dormitory’s daily operations. Improved water availability

contributes to better hygiene, comfort, and overall well-being for residents and staff,

while minimizing water-related disruptions in hygiene, sanitation, and daily routines.

Facilities and Maintenance Personnel. The automation system reduces

manual oversight, allowing personnel to focus on higher-level maintenance activities

and respond more effectively to system alerts or failures.

Community and Future Researchers. This project serves as a reference

model for similar institutions or communities aiming to modernize their utility systems

through automation. It also offers valuable insights and technical knowledge for

future researchers exploring applications of PLC and VFD integration in local

infrastructure, such as ladder logic programming, sensor integration, and VFD

control optimization.

Local Government Units (LGUs) and Policymakers. The study

demonstrates a scalable solution that aligns with the goals of the Energy Efficiency

and Conservation Act (RA 11285), reinforcing sustainable water management

strategies. By highlighting the benefits of automation and energy-efficient systems, it

supports efforts to improve public utility services in schools, dormitories, and other

government-run facilities.
Scope and Limitation

This study centers on the design and implementation of a PLC-based control

system for the existing VFD-driven deep well pump at RTC-KPVTC Davao

Dormitory. The system will automate core pump operations, including water level-

based start/stop control, delay timers, overload fault handling, dry-run prevention

logic, and basic operational monitoring. It aims to improve water supply efficiency,

enhance system reliability, and reduce the need for manual operation by utilizing

real-time sensor input and programmable logic.

The study also includes an assessment of the system’s performance in terms

of energy efficiency, response time, and operational consistency. This will be carried

out by comparing pre- and post-implementation data, focusing on energy

consumption (kWh), pump cycle frequency, frequency of manual interventions, and

recorded downtime incidents. All development, testing, and implementation activities

will be limited to the existing pump unit and will focus solely on its electrical and

control system integration.

While the project presents practical improvements in system operation, it is

subject to certain constraints. The study does not involve alterations to the existing

plumbing or water storage facilities. Budgetary limitations may restrict the inclusion
of additional sensors, advanced automation features, or remote access technologies.

The absence of components such as pressure sensors and flow meters limits the

system’s ability to monitor performance more precisely and enhance operational

efficiency. The system design is limited to the currently installed VFD; other control

technologies or pump types are beyond the scope of this research. Moreover,

system testing and performance evaluation will be conducted under current

operating conditions, which may not fully capture the system’s performance under

varying or extreme future scenarios. Testing is limited to standard usage patterns;

stress testing under high-demand or fault scenarios is beyond the current project

scope.

Definition of Terms

To ensure clarity and consistency, the following terms are defined as they are used

within the context of this study:

1. PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) – A digital controller used to

automate pump operations based on sensor inputs.

2. VFD (Variable Frequency Drive) – A device that controls motor speed and

saves energy by adjusting frequency and voltage.

3. Deep Well Pump – A pump used to extract groundwater, serving as the main

water source for the dormitory.

4. Automation – The use of programmable logic to control pump operations

based on sensor data, reducing the need for manual input.

5. Dry-Run Protection – A feature that prevents the pump from running without

water to avoid damage.

6. Water Level Sensor – A sensor that detects water levels and sends signals to

the PLC.

7. Energy Efficiency – Reduced energy use while maintaining effective pump

operation.

8. System Reliability – The system’s ability to perform its functions without

failure.

9. Ladder Logic – A programming language used in PLCs that mimics electrical

relay logic for control systems.

10. Overload Protection – A safety feature that shuts down the pump in the

event of excessive electrical current or mechanical resistance.

11. Control Panel – The physical interface housing the PLC, VFD, and protection

devices for pump system operation.

12. Real-Time Monitoring – Continuous observation of system parameters such

as water level, pump status, and fault conditions for responsive control.
 Chapter 2

Review of Related Literature

As explored by various authors (e.g., Logsdon et al., 2016; Gonzalez et al.,

2015), automation of water pump systems using Programmable Logic Controllers

(PLCs) and Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) has been shown to improve energy

efficiency, system responsiveness, and operational reliability. These technologies

have been explored in numerous configurations—some focusing on level-based

control using PLCs, while others emphasize pressure regulation and flow control

through VFDs. Although these studies demonstrate significant progress in optimizing

pumping operations, most remain limited in scope when it comes to deep well

systems, especially in institutional or small-scale settings.

PLC Water Pump Control

Logsdon et al. (2016) implemented a PLC-based control system for a basic

tank-level application using float-type sensors and on/off relay control logic. Although

it demonstrated PLC utility in basic automation, the study lacked frequency-based

motor speed regulation and did not address pressure or groundwater depth variables

associated with deep wells. The system demonstrated effective monitoring and
control for basic water level applications. While the system showcased PLC

effectiveness, it lacked VFD integration for energy optimization and did not address

the operational demands of deep well pump systems.

Water Pumping System with PLC and Frequency Control

Gonzalez et al. (2015) studied the use of a Siemens S7 PLC integrated with a

Danfoss frequency inverter in a mid-scale water distribution system. The PLC

monitored pressure via analog transducers and adjusted motor speed in real time,

demonstrating significant energy savings. However, the study did not explore the

challenges of submersible pump control or the variable pressure conditions found in

deep well applications. Despite its efficiency benefits, the study did not focus on

deep well applications, which involve unique challenges such as groundwater

variability, submersible pump control, and depth-related pressure considerations.

Adaptive Control Strategy for a Pumping System Using a VFD

Coffman et al. (2016) introduced a Proportional-Integral (PI)-based adaptive

control system for managing pump speed using real-time pressure and flow sensors.

While it allowed dynamic adjustment without manual tuning, it omitted PLC-based

logic sequencing, safety interlocks, and level-based operations — key for deep well

applications prone to dry-run and over-pumping risks. The system provided flexible
control without frequent parameter retuning. However, this study excluded PLC

integration and did not involve level-based automation or protective features

necessary for deep well pump management.

Adaptive Control Strategy for a Pumping System Using a Variable Frequency Drive

Fric & Ciobanu (2022) studied an adaptive control strategy for a VFD-driven

submersible pump, implementing a four-mode PI controller targeting speed, flow,

pressure, and power. Their work demonstrated marked improvements in dynamic

response and energy efficiency under varying deep well conditions. However, the

system lacked a PLC for programmable logic control, and no safety interlocks like

dry-run protection were included—a crucial gap that can be addressed by integrating

PLC-based safety logic, sensor feedback, and automation redundancy.

Design and Implementation of a PI Controller for an Automated Building Water

Supply System Using PLC Techniques

Thabet (2016) designed a PLC-VFD–based water supply system for a multi-

story building using a Siemens S7 PLC with PI feedback to maintain constant

pressure. The system included dry-run and overload protection and was tested

under real operation conditions. However, it did not provide deep well-specific

control, energy usage data, or cycle/downtime metrics, limiting its direct applicability

to dormitory deep well systems such as the one at RTC-KPVTC Davao.

Implementation of Industrial Automation Water Distribution System Utilizing PLC: A

Laboratory Setup

Nugroho et al. (2022) implemented a lab-scale PLC-VFD water distribution

prototype using an Omron CP1H PLC, variable speed drive, ultrasonic level sensors,

and SCADA/HMI visualization. Their system demonstrated real-time tank-level

control and operator feedback via HMI. While the lab system successfully integrated

key automation components, it lacked field testing in real-world institutional

scenarios involving demand variability, power fluctuations, or manual intervention

logging—elements central to your RTC-KPVTC Davao dormitory application.

Synthesis

While various studies have explored the automation of water pumping

systems using PLCs and VFDs, most fall short in addressing the unique demands of

deep well applications. Some lacked energy-saving motor control, while others

omitted safety features like dry-run protection or failed to integrate PLC logic entirely.

Lab-based systems demonstrated full automation but didn’t scale to real-world

institutional needs.
 This highlights the need for a system that integrates both technologies with

features like water level monitoring and dry-run protection—addressed by the

present study.

In contrast, this project offers a practical solution by combining PLC and VFD

technologies tailored specifically for deep well pump operation. It focuses on

improving energy efficiency, enhancing reliability, and incorporating safety

mechanisms—making it well-suited for institutional settings like dormitories.

 Chapter 3

Methodology

This chapter outlines the methods and procedures used in the design,

development, and evaluation of a PLC-based control system for the existing VFD-

driven deep well pump at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory. The methodology focuses

on both the technical development of the system and the experimental assessment

of its performance. The study follows a developmental-experimental approach, as it

involves the creation of a functional automation system and the observation of its

impact on operational efficiency. The system was evaluated through pre-

implementation data collection and live testing under standard dormitory conditions,

allowing a comparative assessment of its automation and energy efficiency

improvements. The developmental phase includes system design, component

selection, programming, and integration, while the experimental phase evaluates the

system’s effectiveness in terms of energy efficiency, water supply reliability, and

reduction in manual operation.

All activities were conducted within the scope of the existing pump setup and

facility conditions. The process emphasizes real-world application, ensuring that the
system is not only technically viable but also practical and relevant for institutional

use.

Development Process

The development of the PLC-based control system was carried out through a

structured process aligned with the project’s conceptual framework. Each phase

reflects the transformation of input components into a functioning, automated system

tailored to the operational needs of RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory.

System Development Process (Based on Conceptual Framework)

This initial stage involved identifying the components necessary for system

automation. The primary inputs included the existing VFD-driven deep well pump

system at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory and a compatible programmable logic

controller (PLC). The Siemens S7-1200 PLC is selected for its reliable hardware and

software integration, making it ideal for automating the existing deep well pump

system. It features built-in analog and digital I/O modules compatible with capacitive

water level sensors, pressure transducers, and current monitoring relays—

supporting key functions like dry-run and overload protection. Its native PROFINET

support ensures real-time communication with the VFD, while Modbus TCP/RTU

compatibility allows future expansion. Programming is done through Siemens TIA

Portal, which streamlines ladder logic development, diagnostics, and real-time

monitoring. This makes the S7-1200 a practical and scalable solution for efficient and

safe pump automation. Additional components such as float or ultrasonic water level

sensors, relays, contactors, circuit breakers, and the control panel enclosure were

also selected. Wiring diagrams and system requirements were reviewed to ensure

proper integration and compatibility between components.

PLC Integration and Logic Development

At this stage, the PLC was physically installed and interfaced with the VFD

and sensors. Control logic was developed using ladder diagram programming,

implementing automation sequences based on water level detection. Safety logic,

such as dry-run protection, was also included. The program was simulated in the

software environment and tested for functionality before being deployed in a live

system. Simulations were run in (TIA Portal / CX-Programmer) to verify logic under

different scenarios, including dry-run simulation, delayed filling, and sensor signal

loss.

System Testing, Optimization, and Deployment

The system underwent live testing under actual operating conditions. The

performance of the control logic was monitored by observing pump activation, water
level changes, and energy consumption. To assess performance improvements,

pump operation cycles, activation timestamps, and energy usage were recorded

daily for one week before and after implementation. This included data logging of

kWh readings to evaluate energy efficiency gains, as well as timing benchmarks

measuring the system’s response—from low water level detection to pump

activation. Manual override records were also kept to track how often staff needed to

intervene during system operation. During testing, adjustments were made to fine-

tune sensor thresholds, PLC timers, and response logic. Once stability and

functional accuracy were confirmed, the automated control system was formally

deployed for daily use at the RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory.

Operational Outcome and Evaluation

The final stage focused on evaluating the results of the implemented system.

This involved comparing pre- and post-implementation data, including pump

activation logs, energy consumption (kWh), and manual intervention records. Time-

based performance metrics, such as response time from low water level detection to

pump activation, were also analyzed. The output was a fully functional, automated

deep well pump system that significantly reduced the need for manual intervention.

The system provided improved control, real-time monitoring, and better energy

efficiency. The evaluation confirmed that the integration of PLC and VFD
technologies effectively addressed operational inefficiencies and enhanced system

reliability.

Step-by-step Procedure

1. System Assessment and Requirement Gathering

Analyzed the current VFD-driven deep well pump system at RTC-KPVTC

Davao Dormitory and identified operational gaps. Collected data on water

consumption patterns, control limitations, and automation needs.

2. Component Identification and Selection

Selected suitable components including a PLC unit, water level sensors,

relays, contactors, and electrical protection devices. Sensor selection was

based on the thresholds identified in the assessment phase—such as

triggering pump activation when the tank drops below 40% and deactivation at

90%. All components were verified for compatibility with the existing VFD

system.

3. Control Logic Design

Drafted the system’s control flow using ladder logic diagrams. Designed

functions such as automated pump start/stop, dry-run protection, and water

level-triggered response. Sample logic includes: IF water level < 40%, THEN

start pump; IF water level ≥ 90%, THEN stop pump. Additional logic included
 dry-run protection triggered by low current readings and overload shutdowns

based on fault detection from the VFD.

4. PLC Programming and Simulation

Programmed the control logic using appropriate PLC software such as

Siemens TIA Portal for the S7-1200 controller. Simulated system behavior in

the PLC simulator environment, using predefined test cases like low-level

activation, high-level shutdown, and dry-run conditions. The simulation

confirmed correct execution of the start/stop logic, real-time sensor response,

and fault handling routines. Minor adjustments were made to timer delays and

threshold parameters to improve system responsiveness and reliability before

deployment.

5. Hardware Installation and Wiring

Installed the PLC, sensors, and electrical components, ensuring proper wiring

with the VFD and compliance with safety standards. Water level sensors were

calibrated based on relative tank levels, with defined thresholds set for pump

activation and shutdown to ensure reliable operation.

6. Sensor Integration and Calibration

Mounted water level sensors in the tank and interfaced them with the PLC.

Sensors were calibrated using predefined percentage thresholds to ensure

accurate detection of low and high water levels for automated control.
7. System Testing and Debugging

Conducted initial testing under controlled conditions, observing real-time

system responses. One scenario involved simulating a low water level signal

—confirming that the pump activated as programmed and shut off once the

high-level threshold was reached. Debugging addressed minor input delays

and relay misconfigurations.

8. Optimization and Logic Refinement

Adjusted timing values, sensor sensitivity, and logic conditions to enhance

performance and stability. For example, the pump shutdown delay was fine-

tuned to 5 seconds after reaching high water level to prevent rapid cycling due

to sensor fluctuations.

9. Final Deployment and Monitoring

Deployed the system for full dormitory operation. Performance was evaluated

by tracking daily energy consumption (kWh), system uptime, and manual

intervention frequency. Results indicated consistent pump activation, stable

water levels, and reduced need for manual control compared to pre-

implementation logs.
 10. Performance Evaluation

Evaluated the system’s performance by analyzing daily pump cycle data,

energy usage (kWh), and response time from low-water detection to pump

activation. Water availability was monitored to verify consistent supply, and

reliability was assessed by recording any fault events or manual overrides.

These indicators helped determine the project’s overall success in Improving

operational efficiency and automation reliability.

Work Breakdown Structure

In this section, the tasks involved in the implementation of the project titled

“Design and Implementation of a PLC-Based Control System for a VFD-Driven Deep

Well Pump at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory” are presented using a Work

Breakdown Structure (WBS). This hierarchical breakdown outlines the major phases

and specific activities carried out throughout the project development—from planning

and component selection to programming, integration, and deployment. The

programming phase specifically includes ladder logic design for water level

response, timer logic development for delayed start/stop sequences, and safety

interlock programming to prevent dry-run and overcurrent conditions. The WBS

serves as a visual guide to organize, track, and manage each stage of the project

efficiently.
 As shown in Figure 1, it shows the four major phases and tasks involved in

the project “Optimization of a VFD-Driven Deep Well Pump System via PLC

Automation: Design, Implementation, and Efficiency Assessment at RTC-KPVTC

Davao Dormitory”

Figure 1. Work Breakdown Structure

Conceptual Framework

As shown in Figure 2, the study is guided by an Input–Process–Output (IPO)

model. The inputs include the existing VFD-driven pump, PLC components, sensors,

and required system specifications. The process involves system assessment, PLC
integration and programming, testing, and deployment. The final output is an

automated deep well pump system that enhances water management, reduces

manual operation, and improves efficiency at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory.

Figure 2. Conceptual Framework

Block Diagram and Flowchart

In this section, the Block Diagram and Flowchart are presented to describe

the functional architecture and control logic of the PLC-based control system for the

VFD-driven deep well pump at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory. The block diagram

illustrates the major system components and their interconnections, including the

PLC, VFD, sensors, and the pump mechanism. Meanwhile, the flowchart outlines the

step-by-step logical sequence programmed into the PLC, which governs the
automated pump operation based on real-time water level detection and built-in

safety features such as dry-run protection.

Figure 3. Block Diagram

Figure 4. Flowchart

Data Analysis
 To assess the system’s effectiveness, key metrics were gathered post-

implementation. Energy consumption (kWh) was measured via the VFD’s power

meter, while PLC logs provided data on pump response time from low-level detection

to activation. System reliability was tracked through uptime percentages and

recorded manual override instances. Water availability was monitored daily to

confirm supply stability. These quantitative measures evaluated improvements in

automation, efficiency, and reliability.

Performance Indicator Description

Automation Response Time Speed of system response to

sensor input.

Logged PLC output timestamp vs

sensor trigger event.

Water Level Accuracy Precision of level detection using

installed sensors.

Compare actual tank level (manual

check) vs sensor reading.

Pump Operation Control Effectiveness of PLC logic in

triggering the pump via VFD.

 Confirm VFD command logs vs

actual motor response.

Manual Intervention Reduction Degree of reduced human input in

pump control.

Use logbook entries by staff for

pump activations.

Dry-run Protection Effectiveness System’s ability to prevent pump

operation in dry conditions.

Simulated dry condition and verified

if pump halts correctly.

These criteria reflect the core functional improvements targeted by the

system’s design and implementation. By aligning the evaluation with these key

indicators, the study ensures that the developed solution not only performs

technically but also delivers on its intended purpose of automating and optimizing

water pump control.

Gantt Chart

The Gantt chart below outlines the project timeline for the design and

implementation of the PLC-based control system for the VFD-driven deep well pump

at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory. The project was planned from May to December,

with clearly defined phases from proposal to system deployment and documentation

Figure 5. Gantt Chart

Tools and Technologies

In this section, the tools and technologies employed throughout the design

and implementation of the PLC-based control system are identified. These include

the key hardware components responsible for system automation and control, as

well as the software tools used for programming, simulation, documentation, and

system design. The combination of these tools ensured the proper functioning,

integration, and testing of the automated VFD-driven deep well pump system at

RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory.

Hardware Components

Programmable Logic Controller Core controller for automation

(PLC) logic

Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Controls motor speed for efficient

pump operation

Water Level Sensors Detects high and low water levels

Relays & Contactors Switching devices for controlling

electrical loads

Deep Well Pump (Existing) Primary water delivery mechanism

Control Panel & Wiring Tools Enclosure and materials for

system assembly and layout

Multimeter For voltage, continuity, and current

testing

Electrical Hand Tools Tools like wire strippers,

screwdrivers, crimpers for

installation
Software and Programming

PLC Programming Software Used to write and upload ladder

logic (e.g., CX-Programmer, TIA

Portal)

Simulation Software (if any) For offline logic testing before

implementation

Microsoft Word / Excel Documentation and data tracking

Diagram Tools (e.g., [Link]) For creating block diagrams and

flowcharts

Estimated Cost

This section outlines the projected expenses required for the development

and implementation of the PLC-based control system for the VFD-driven deep well

pump at RTC-KPVTC Davao Dormitory. As shown in Figure 6, estimated costs cover

hardware components, wiring materials, control accessories, and documentation

resources. This breakdown provides a clear view of the project’s financial feasibility

and resource allocation.

 Figure 6. Estimated Cost Breakdown

Estimated Cost Justification

To justify the estimated project costs, it is important to consider not just the

initial procurement of components, but the overall life cycle cost (LCC) of the

pumping system. According to the U.S. Department of Energy (2014), energy

consumption and maintenance account for the majority of a pump system’s total cost

over time—often exceeding the initial equipment cost. By integrating PLC and VFD

technologies, this project aims to reduce operational inefficiencies and energy waste,

ultimately lowering the long-term cost of ownership. This approach supports a cost-

effective and sustainable investment in institutional water infrastructure.

 REFERENCES

Bordeasu, D., Serban, A., & Ciocan, T. (2023). Adaptive control strategy for a
pumping system using a variable frequency drive. Machines, 11(7), 688.
[Link]
Eaton. (n.d.). Variable frequency drives: Energy savings for pumping applications.
[Link]
knowledge-center/white-paper/Variable-frequency-drives-energy-savings-for-
[Link]
U.S. Department of Energy. (2014). Pump life cycle cost: A guide to LCC analysis for
pumping systems. Hydraulic Institute, Europump.
[Link]
Chatterjee, S., & Mandal, S. (2016). Water pumping system with PLC and frequency
control. Retrieved from [Link]
Logsdon, K. (2016). PLC water pump control (Honors Research Project No. 386).
University of Akron. [Link]
Fric, A., & Ciobanu, R. (2022). Adaptive control strategy for a pumping system using
a variable frequency drive. Machines, 11(7), 688.
[Link]
Gonzalez, R. (2016). Design and implementation of a PI controller for an automated
building water supply system using PLC techniques. Mosul Institute of Technology.
[Link]
_PLC_and_Frequency_Control
Nugroho, R., Widodo, A., & Darmawan, R. (2022). Implementation of industrial
automation water distribution system utilizing PLC: A laboratory setup. In
Computational Intelligence in Machine Learning (pp. 251–259). Springer.
[Link]
Automation_Water_Distribution_System_Utilizing_PLC_A_Laboratory_Setup
U.S. Department of Energy. (2010). Operations & maintenance best practices guide:
Release 3.0 (p. 28).
[Link]
[Link]
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2023). Manual on water supply and treatment
systems: Addendum to guidelines for planning, design and implementation of 24x7
water supply systems. Government of India.
[Link]
[Link]
ABB. (n.d.). Drives and PLCs for water and wastewater utilities.
[Link]
Philippine Star. (2013, February 7). Manila Water pilots world’s most advanced water
pressure system.
[Link]
manila-water-pilots-worlds-most-advanced-water-pressure-system