Scribd
Upload
40 views5 pages

Jharkhand High Court Writ Petition on Service Confirmation

The petitioner, Shaikh Abdul Azeez, seeks a writ of mandamus for the confirmation of his service and the grant of Time Bound Promotion benefits after his retirement. He argues that his appointment was lawful and that similar cases have been resolved in favor of other petitioners, as affirmed by the Supreme Court. The petitioner also requests the quashing of previous rejection letters and inquiry reports that denied his claims based on technicalities.

Uploaded by

Ayushi Ranjan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views5 pages

Jharkhand High Court Writ Petition on Service Confirmation

The petitioner, Shaikh Abdul Azeez, seeks a writ of mandamus for the confirmation of his service and the grant of Time Bound Promotion benefits after his retirement. He argues that his appointment was lawful and that similar cases have been resolved in favor of other petitioners, as affirmed by the Supreme Court. The petitioner also requests the quashing of previous rejection letters and inquiry reports that denied his claims based on technicalities.

Uploaded by

Ayushi Ranjan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

( CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION)

W.P (S) No. _________/2025

SHAIKH ABDUL AZEEZ ………PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS ……RESPONDENTS

Sub: ACP/MACP

SYNOPSIS WITH FACTS AND DATES

Prayer a. For issuance of a writ(s)/order (s)/direction (s) or

particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus

commanding upon the respondents to

absorbed/confirmation of service of the petitioner

as the petitioner has been appointed in

accordance with Law against sanctioned and

vacant post and also on the ground that issue is

no more res integr and affirmed up to Hon’ble

Apex Court;

AND/OR;
b. For issuance of a writ(s)/order (s)/direction (s) or

particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus

commanding upon the respondents that after

absorbing/confirmation of the service of the

petitioner, consider the case of the petitioner for

grant of Time Bound Promotion and pay 1st,

2ndACP and 3rd MACP with its arrear.

AND/OR;

c. For issuance of a writ(s)/order (s)/direction (s) or

particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus

commanding upon the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioner for absorption in light

of similar short of litigation and also in view of

the order passed by this Hon'ble Court where the

Enquiry Report dated 11.2.2016 has been set

aside in WP(S) No.4199/2011, hence the

respondents ought to have re-considered the case


of the petitioner for absorption/confirmation of

service as the petitioner has already retired on

30.11.2020 with pension and retiral benefits.

AND/OR;

d. For issuance of a writ(s)/order (s)/direction (s) or

particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus

commanding upon the respondents to confirm the

service of the petitioner from the initial date of

appointment;

AND/OR;

e. For issuance of a writ(s)/order (s)/direction (s) or

particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for

quashing of the letter dated 19.03.2013 by which

claim of the petitioner has been rejected as when

petitioner moved earlier before this Hon’ble

Court without assigning the reason as the issue

has been set at rest up to the Hon’ble Supreme


court.

AND/OR;

f. For issuance of a writ(s)/order (s)/direction (s) or

particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for

quashing of the enquiry report dated 11.02.2016

so far it relates to petitioner’s by which claim of

the petitioner has been rejected on the ground

that initially petitioner was not working against

the sanctioned post, when the issue has been set

at rest up to Hon’ble Apex Court, in spite of that

benefit not extended to petitioner.

AND/OR;

g. Pass such other order(s)/direction(s) as Your

Lordships may deem fit and proper under the

facts and circumstances of this case for doing

conscionable justice to the petitioner.

You might also like