CHAPTER TWO:
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This chapter presents a review of related literature by various scholars and researchers had to say
about the different factors influencing the performance of employees in an organization. The
main purpose of literature is to find out what has been done and the one that has been left out in
this area of study. A number of motivation and performance experts have heard a key influence
on organization and it’s from these experts that this literature was derived.
2.1 Conceptual framework
2.1.1 Performance appraisal
Performance appraisal (PA) is a systematic evaluation process used by organizations to assess
employees' job performance and productivity (Armstrong & Baron, 1998). In the context of the
Federal Road Safety Command (FRSC) in Kano State, performance appraisal serves as a tool for
measuring employees' contributions toward achieving organizational goals. The conceptual
framework of this study is anchored on the relationship between performance appraisal and
worker productivity, emphasizing how feedback, recognition, and goal-setting influence
employee motivation and efficiency (Aguinis, 2019). The framework also considers how
structured appraisals align individual performance with the FRSC’s strategic objectives,
fostering a culture of accountability and continuous improvement.
The performance appraisal is the periodic evaluation of an employee’s performance measured
against the job’s stated or presumed requirements (Terry and Franklin, 2003). Mullins (1999)
substantiates the necessity of an effective appraisal scheme by saying that it can identify an
individual’s strengths and weaknesses and indicate how such strengths may best be utilized and
weaknesses overcome. A generation ago, appraisal systems tended to emphasize employee
traits, deficiencies and abilities. With the development of the employee/organization relations
modern appraisal philosophy emphasizes on the present performance and future goals.
According to (Dechev, 2010), Modern philosophy also stresses on employee participation in
mutually set goals with the supervisor. The underlying philosophy behind mutual setting of goals
is that people will work harder for goals or objectives that they have participated in setting. The
assumption is that people want to satisfy some of their needs through performing work activities
that provide them with a supportive environment. They also need to perform meaningful tasks,
share the objectives setting, share the rewards of their efforts and continued personal growth.
The evaluation job performance has been called by many different names throughout the years –
a tool of management, a control process, a critical element in human resource allocation and
many others. The first appraisal systems have been just methods for determining whether the
salary of the employees in the organizations was fair or not. Later, some empirical studies have
shown that reduction or future pay were not the main effects of the process. Performance
appraisal was recognized as a tool for motivation and development in the United States in the
1950s (Cardy& Dobbins, 1994).
According to (Hamsh, 2021). performance appraisal is the process by which a manager, or a
consultant examines and evaluates an employee‟s work behavior by comparing it with preset
standards, documents the results of the comparison, and uses the results to provide feedback to
show where improvements are needed and why. Performance appraisals are employed to
determine who needs what training and also will be promoted, demoted, retained, or fired.
Griffin (1992) sees performance appraisal as a continuous process of assessing and measuring
the inputs of every employees with a view to knowing their strength and weaknesses (Brown &
Benson, 2003) and communicating the results back to the employees (Cook & Crossman, 2004).
With a good appraisal system those who contribute more will be adequately rewarded and the
right type of people are likely to be promoted into positions of higher responsibilities (Stonner,
Freeman & Gilbert, 2005).
2.2 Effect of Performance Appraisal on Employees’ Performance
Performance appraisal significantly impacts employees' performance by providing feedback,
identifying strengths and weaknesses, and facilitating career development (Murphy & Cleveland,
1995). In the FRSC Kano State Command, a well-structured appraisal system can enhance
productivity by motivating employees through rewards, promotions, and training opportunities
(Aguinis, 2019). Studies indicate that when employees perceive appraisals as fair and
transparent, their job satisfaction and commitment increase, leading to higher productivity
(DeNisi & Smith, 2014). Conversely, poorly implemented appraisals may lead to demotivation
and reduced performance (Pulakos, 2009). Thus, the effectiveness of performance appraisal in
the FRSC depends on its design, implementation, and employees' perceptions of fairness.
2.3 Effect of Performance Appraisal on Management Training
Performance appraisal plays a crucial role in identifying employees' training needs, enabling
management to design targeted development programs (Noe, 2017). In the FRSC Kano State
Command, appraisal results can guide decisions on leadership training, technical skill
enhancement, and capacity-building initiatives. Research shows that organizations that integrate
appraisal outcomes into training programs experience improved employee competencies and
operational efficiency (Sung & Choi, 2014). Additionally, performance appraisal helps in
succession planning by identifying high-potential employees for leadership roles (Cascio, 2018).
Therefore, a robust appraisal system ensures that training interventions are aligned with both
individual and organizational needs.
2.3.1 Staff training in relation to employee performance
No matter how automated an organization maybe, high productivity depends on the level of
motivation and effectiveness of the workforce. The staff training is indispensable strategy for
motivating workers .A high quality employment relationship is of great importance for both
workers and firms. Therefore both have an incentive to invest in the match, investing in labour
training is an important instrument for increasing productivity of workers and hence the quality
of the match.
Training can be defined as general or specific according to (Backer, 1964).General training is
productive in other matches as well(and here costs and returns are born by the workers. While
specific training is productive with the current employer (and hence paid by the firm).in this
competitive world, without any friction, the distinction between general and specific training is
economically meaningful and investment in both types of training is efficient. However capital
market imperfections, labour market imperfections and information problems may cause
underinvestment in training (Louven, 2005).
According to (sultan, 1997),one way to understand organizational impact of training is to
evaluate performance of employees in every work accomplished and this will definitely have to
show whether training has been affective or not.
Nigel, etal (1998) argued that training has lead to increased competence thus improving labour
performance but also has a high labour turnover in many organizations basically in Uganda.
However when employees attain more skills, knowledge and attitude as the best way of doing
their jobs, they tend to leave the organization feeling that its not to their standard.
(Cole, 1997) argues that there are several benefits of training especially on performance of an
organization. That training empowers new skills, knowledge and attitudes that will improve on
its performance thus enhancing high productivity and profits within the organization. Many
businesses in Uganda which are indulged in training programmes have experienced the above
stages of development whereby when the organization yields high profits, welfare of the
employees is likely to be high.
(Shaun & Alfood, 1996) stated that training is an open door to new ideas, viewpoints innovative,
creative and supply a wide background of knowledge to workers in an organization conducting
training they further argued that workers require creative skills and initiate new ideas and
knowledge on their jobs which enhances new working systems which may lead to high
productivity in the organization.
The organization also benefits from timing in that it minimizes the cost which might have been
incurred because most organizations especially in Uganda prefer on the job training where
employees work and learn at the same time as (Sultan, 1997) argues that less effort is needed, it
also eliminated time wastage.
In many organizations, training promote culture of excellence and competence in that when it is
effectively conducted it will outcompete the external environment and also competitiveness
against the workers thus enhancing high levels of performance. In conclusion therefore, the
above mentioned scholars revealed the relevancy of training workers in the organization. They
further argued that without training the employees’ performance in organizations could no (us
civil rights act 1964) be of good quality due to high changing technology.
2.3.2 Job security in relation to workers performance
Job security means the probability that an individual will keep his or her job. Ago with a high
level of security is such that person with the job would have small chance of becoming an
employed the factors affecting job security include the economy prevailing business condition
and the individual personal skills. It has been found that people have more job security in times
of economic expansion and less in times of recession. Also some laws such as the (us civil rights
act of 1964) bolster job security by making it illegal to fire employees for certain reasons
Job security plays an important role in both social and working life because it helps an
individual not to worry about the future, contributes to maintaining labour peace, increases
organization productivity and protecting social balance and values. For this reason in not to
cause employees prestige loss in society, employees should not be dismissed from organizations
without a reasonable grounds because job security has political and social dimensions. Therefore
if in a country employees are dismissed without a clear reason, it is difficult to talk about social
order peace and stability (Guzel, 2001)
Typically government jobs and jobs in education, healthcare and law enforcement are considered
very secure while private sector jobs are generally believed to offer low job security and it
usually varies by industry location occupation and other factors. To some extent job security
varies by employment laws of each country and personal factors such as education, work,
experience, job functional area, work industry, and work location play an important role in
determining the need for an individual’s services and impacts their personal job security. Since
job security depends on having the necessary skills and experiences that are in demand by
employers, which in turn depend on the prevailing economic conditions and business
environment, individuals whose services are in demand by employer will tend to enjoy higher
job security.
Factors motivating employees can occur in various forms; in fact job security is one of the most
influential means of motivating employees particularly in times of economic down turn.
Employees believe that they will not lose their jobs or they will be employed in the same
organization as long as they want is a significant reason for motivation. Job security is one of the
most significant variables of employee satisfaction which expresses the general attitude of the
employee towards his/her job.
Job security guarantees the continuity of employment is also an important safety expectation.
This assurance that the employees will work at the same job for long years eliminates questions
and worries about the future which is perceived as part of job safety. (Telman & Ansal, 2004)
Fear to be dismissed from the organization is an element of oppression for the employees. The
behavior change caused by this fear is felt more obviously particularly in economies with limited
employment opportunities. Research by (Probst & Brinsbaker, 2001) show that motivation of
employees lowers when they perceive job security negatively, their attitudes change towards not
obeying the rules and this leads to an increase in job accidents.
Today, job security is perceived as an indispensable right of an employee which guarantees that
the employee and his/her family will not be deprived of their income and maintains a honorable
life. Thus employees consider the condition of job security just at the beginning of their careers
so as to feel confident about the future. They oppose government privatization policies in order
not to lose this warranty or prefer to work in public sector though they may earn less as
compared to those working in private sector due to public sector offering job security (journal of
economics and social studies).
2.4 Historical Background of Road Safety Commission
Prior to the establishment of Federal Road Safety Commission in 1988, there was no concrete
and sustained policy action to address the carnage on Nigerian roads. Earlier attempts in this
direction were limited to discrete and isolated attempts by some states of the federation and
individuals.
Notable among the efforts to institute a formidable road safety program was the effort of Shell
Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC) between 1960 and 1965. The effort of the
Nigerian Army in the training of its officers and men on road safety the early 1970s also
contributed to road safety ideas and consciousness in Nigeria: The Nigerian Army started the
First Public Road Safety Campaign in 1972 when it initiated an annual Road Safety Week.
The first deliberate policy on road safety was the creation in 1974 of the National Road Safety
Commission (NRSC) by the then military government. The impact of the Commission was
however, not sustained. In 1977, the Military Administration in Oyo State, Nigeria established
the Oyo State Road Safety Corps which made some local significant improvements in road
safety and road discipline in the state. That lasted till 1983, when it was disbanded by the federal
government. With the continued dangerous trend of road traffic accidents in Nigeria then, which
placed it as one of the most road traffic accident (RTA) prone countries worldwide (the most in
Africa) in 2013, the Nigerian government saw the need to establish the present Federal Road
Safety Corps in 1988 to address the carnage on the highways.
Establishment Act
The unpleasant trend in the nation’s road traffic system which resulted in upsurge in road traffic
accidents made the Federal Government initiate a search for a credible and effective response to
the challenge. In February 1988, the Federal Government established the Federal Road Safety
Commission through Decree No. 45 of the 1988 as amended by Decree 35 of 1992 referred to in
the statute books as the FRSC Act cap 141 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN), passed by
the National Assembly as Federal Road Safety Corps (establishment) Act 2007.
Statutory Functions
The functions of the Commission generally relates to:
Making the highway safe for motorists and other road users.
Recommending works and devices designed to eliminate or minimize accidents on the
highways and advising the Federal and State Governments including the Federal Capital
Territory Administration and relevant governmental agencies on the localities where such
works and devices are required, and
Educating motorists and members of the public on the importance of discipline on the
highway.
In particular, the Commission is charged with responsibilities as follows:
Preventing or minimizing accidents on the highway.
Clearing obstructions on any part of the highways.
Educating drivers, motorists and other members of the public generally on the proper use
of the highways.
Designing and producing the driver’s license to be used by various categories of vehicle
operators.
Determining, from time to time, the requirements to be satisfied by an applicant for a
driver's license.
Designing and producing vehicle number plates.
The standardization of highway traffic codes.
Educating drivers, motorists and other members of the public generally on the proper use
of the highways.
Giving prompt attention and care to victims of accidents.
Conducting researches into causes of motor accidents and methods of preventing them
and putting into use the result of such researches.
Determining and enforcing speed limits for all categories of roads and vehicles and
controlling the use of speed limiting devices.
Cooperating with bodies or agencies or groups in road safety activities or in prevention of
accidents on the highways.
Making regulations in pursuance of any of the functions assigned to the Corps by or
under this Act.
Regulating the use of sirens, flashers and beacon lights on vehicles other than ambulances
and vehicles belonging to the Armed Forces, Nigeria Police, Fire Service and other
Paramilitary agencies;
Providing roadside and mobile clinics for the treatment of accident victims free of charge.
Regulating the use of mobile phones by motorists.
Regulating the use of seat belts and other safety devices.
Regulating the use of motorcycles on the highways.
Federal Road Safety Corps is the Government Agency with statutory responsibilities for road
safety administration in Nigeria founded in 1988. In the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC)
operates in all Nigerian states as well as the Federal Capital Territory and is the lead agency in
Nigeria on road safety administration and management. The statutory functions include: Making
the highways safe for motorists and other road users as well as checking road worthiness of
vehicles, recommending works and infrastructures to eliminate or minimize accidents on the
highways and educating motorists and members of the public on the importance of road
discipline on the highways.
Therefore, it is the major task of every government to motivate their workers to create the will to
work. A worker may be skilled or very competent to do a work, but nothing can be achieved if
he is not willing to work. The process of create the will to work is what motivation is all about.
The contribution of Laurel (1990) sees motivation as the direction and persistence of action. It is
concerned with the way people choose a particular course of action in preference to others, any
why they continue with a chosen action, often over a long period, and in the face of difficulties
and. problem. Motivation therefore manifests in job satisfaction (attitudinal) and performance
(behavioural) and thus provides the link between workers job satisfaction and Worker
performance.
2.4.1 Objectives of Federal Road Safety Commission in Kano State Command
The federal road safety commission kano command has the following objectives to regulate
enforcement coordinate all road traffic and safety management activities through:
1) Sustained public enlightment programmes: This is achieved through motor park
vallies sensitization/awareness programmes in the print electronic media, distribution of pliers
and hand bills, boards, roads shows etc.
2) Improved vehicle administration: The federal road safety commission (FRSC) been the
elected agency in the traffic management and administration has put in place motor vehicle
administration which refers to preparation of document that is adopted by all state government in
which it has to do with the administration/registration of vehicle in various state of Nigeria,
which is done in form of registration details of vehicles, and also the details contain the manner
and how a vehicle should be operated.
3) Prompt rescuer services: This refers to quick respond to emergency in occurrence of
accident on the road, it is the responsibility of the federal road safety commission (FRSC) do
obtained the accident victims and also for quick access of information in regards to emergency or
occurrence of accident for first aid treatment before taking to the hospital and also clearing a
accident place, the federal road safety commission (FRSC) has emergency number available
which will be call upon by any individual during emergency for quick arrival at punctual time at
the accident place, the emergency response time is 15 minute from the time of report of accident,
and in regard to punctuality federal road safety commission (FRSC) is doing all its best to
sustained this temple.
4) Robust data management: The traffic management and administration which is now
digital at it was analogue before, and everything is been stored. It deals with the issue of driving
license, that is data management bank, where all information drivers license applicant after
issuance are stored so that any time you want to gate such record is available in federal road
safety commission (FRSC) website, even the vehicle registration Nationwide is stated in data
management bank and federal road safety commission (FRSC) has another policy that involved
deriving school standardization scheme with is also digitalized and all information about the
existed deriving school and the certification sector, and also have data base for all filling
operators.
5) Promotion of stakeholder cooperation: This is a collaborated arms of government that
complimented the work of federal road safety commission (FRSC) there in power by the same
act to operate and enforcement and enlightment, and also under this the federal road safety
commission is collaborated with transport union and other stakeholders, community leaders and
religious leaders, with a view to minimizing and gateway of road traffic crashes.
2.4.2 Role of Motivation in an organization
The role of motivation is important in any organization because it' involves the action phase of
behaviour. It is poorly' understood because it is an extremely complex and subtle phenomenon.
Researchers have been concerned with developing means by which human needs can be harness
to achieve organizational objectives. The Hawthorne studies had shown that workers had social
as well as purely economic needs.
Elton Mayo initiated .the Hawthorne study in 1927 in an electronic company, which supply Bell
Telephone. His study therefore centred on question which stemmed from the scientific
management view of man, the physical conditions of work and physiological capacity of the
worker, coupled with monetary incentive, -were held to be the primarily influences on
productivity.
The contribution of Arnold and Feldman (1986 pp. 155-176) in which they describe job
satisfaction as "the amount of overall affect that individuals have toward their job." In another
related view by McCormick and Hegen (1980) regard job satisfaction as a person's attitude
towards his or her job, this may vary along a continuum .from positive to negative.
In a related development by Walker (1980) proposes a model in which the determinant of
performance, job satisfaction and motivation are indicated as work-related variables (the work
context, task activities and job objectives), the individual (individual skills, abilities and
knowledge) and rewards. This model includes aspects physical working conditions, career
matters, and remuneration packages.
The feelings and attitudes of workers towards their work are influenced significantly by their
sources both of motivation and of demotivation (Spector, 2003). In addition, the manner in
which the workers perceive the organization has a direct bearing on both their level of
motivation, and the degree of job satisfaction that they experience.
According to Finder (1998 pp. 505-514) employee motivation is an innate force shaped and
maintained by a set of highly individualistic factors that may change from time to tune,
depending on the particular needs and motives of an employee. Environmental factors do not
have a causal link with motivation but do impact on the level of motivation experienced by an
employee and, together, innate, and, environmental forces determine behaviour at work.
Gouws (1995) also points out that the factors that motivate employees are the same ones that
contribute towards their satisfaction in the workplace and subsequently concludes that motivated
employees are generally also satisfied with their work. Herzberg (1960) concluded that job
satisfaction and job dissatisfaction were not opposite points on a continuum but in fact two
separate dimensions. Extrinsic factors, such as company policies, incompetent supervision, or
unsatisfactory working conditions may lead to dissatisfaction. Such dissatisfaction may be
reduced by hygienic measures, such as fringe benefits, 'human relations' training for foremen, of
better company policies, but such measures will not make worker satisfied, only apathetic. For
true satisfaction to be obtained, 'intrinsic' factors, such as achievement, accomplishment,
recognition, responsibility and challenging work, must be pr6vided. Conclusively, that
satisfaction is obtained primarily from the 'content' of work itself, dissatisfaction is derived from
its 'context' of environment only satisfaction related to productivity. The presence of
'dissatisfaction' may lead to low morale or absenteeism, but its elimination will not raise
motivation or productivity.
Herzberg also said that it is a mistake to emphasize 'extrinsic' measures, which serve only to
make the work environment tolerable, instead management should seek to enrich the job to make
it seem interesting and important.
2.5 Theoretical Framework
This study is grounded in Goal-Setting Theory (Locke & Latham, 1990) and Expectancy Theory
(Vroom, 1964). Goal-Setting Theory posits that clear, challenging performance goals enhance
employee motivation and productivity, which aligns with the FRSC’s use of appraisals to set
measurable targets. Expectancy Theory suggests that employees are motivated when they believe
their efforts will lead to rewards, reinforcing the importance of a fair appraisal system in driving
performance (Pinder, 2014). These theories provide a lens through which the impact of
performance appraisal on worker productivity in the FRSC Kano State Command can be
analyzed.
2.6 Empirical Studies
Several empirical studies support the relationship between performance appraisal and
productivity. A study by Kuvaas (2006) found that employees who received constructive
feedback through appraisals exhibited higher job performance. Similarly, a survey by Mone and
London (2018) in public sector organizations revealed that performance appraisal positively
influences employee engagement and efficiency. In Nigeria, research by Okoro and Eze (2019)
highlighted that public agencies with structured appraisal systems, like the FRSC, recorded better
service delivery. However, some studies also note challenges such as rater bias and lack of
follow-up actions, which can diminish the effectiveness of appraisals (Smither et al., 2005).
2.7 Summary and Uniqueness of the Study
This chapter has reviewed relevant literature on performance appraisal and its impact on worker
productivity, with a focus on the FRSC Kano State Command. While existing studies provide
insights into appraisal systems in public sector organizations, this study uniquely examines the
specific dynamics within the FRSC, considering Nigeria’s socio-economic and administrative
context. By integrating Goal-Setting and Expectancy Theories, this research contributes to
understanding how performance appraisal can be optimized to enhance productivity in road
safety management (Aguinis, 2019). The findings will offer practical recommendations for
improving appraisal systems in the FRSC and similar organizations.