Chapter 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of the

quantitative data generated from the survey.

Demographic Profile

This portion presents the demographic profile of the respondents in

terms of age, sex, educational attainment, and employment status.

Age. Table 1 shows the distribution of respondents according to age.

It can be seen that 12 respondent or 27.3 percent is 21-30 years old. 8

respondents or 18.2 percent are 31-40 years old. 1 respondents or 2.3

percent are 41-50 years old. 3 respondents or 6.8 percent are 51years

old and above. This implies that majority of the respondents of the

study are 21-30 years old.

Table 1. Distribution of Respondents according to their Age

Age Frequency Percentage

21-30 12 27.3
31-40 8 18.2
41-50 1 2.3
51 and above 3 6.8
Missing 20 45.45
Total 44 100
 Sex. Table 2 shows the distribution of respondents according to
gender. Majority of the respondents or 68.2 percent are male and 27.3
percent or 12 of the respondents are female. It implies that majority of
the respondents are male.

Table 2. Distribution of Respondents according to their Sex

Sex Frequency Percentage

Female 12 27.3
Male 30 68.2
Total 44 100

Civil Status. Table 3 shows the distribution of respondents according

to civil status. 20 or 45.5 percent are single. 23 or 52.3 percent are
married and 1 or 2.3 are widow. It implies that majority of the
respondent Civil Status are married.
Table 3. Distribution of Respondents according to their Civil Status

Status Frequency Percentage

Single 20 45.5

Married 23 52.3

Widow 1 2.3

Total 44 100

Religion. Table 4 shows the distribution of respondents according to

employment status. As shown, 24 of the respondents or 54.5 percent are

staff. 20 of the respondents or 45.5 percent are faculty.

Table 4. Distribution of Respondents according to their Employment

status

Frequency Percentage
Employment Status

Staff 24 54.5

Faculty 20 45.5

Total 44 100

Educational Attainment. Table 5 shows the distribution of respondents

according to educational attainment. Out of 44 respondents, 1 or 2.3 percent

are college level. 19 of the respondents or 43.2 percent are college

graduate. 18 or 40.9 percent were masters, 6 or 13.6 percent were doctor.

 Table 5. Distribution Respondents according to their Educational
Attainment

Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage

College Level 1 2.3

College Graduate 19 43.2

Master 18 40.9

Doctor 6 13.6

Total 44 100

Length of Service. Table 6 shows the distribution of respondents according

to length of service. 33 of the respondents or 75.0 percent are 1-10 years

while 4 or 9.1 percent are 11-20 years and 7 or 15.9 of the respondents are

21-35.

Table 6. Distribution of Respondents according to their Length of

Service

Length of Service Frequency Percentage

1-10 years 33 75.0

11-20 years 4 9.1

21-35 years 7 15.9

Total 44 100
Income Status. Table 7 shows the distribution of respondents according to

their income status. The researcher found out that 34 or 77.3 percent of the

respondents’ monthly income are 10,000-30,000. 6 respondents or 13.6 are

in 31,000-60,000 and 2 or 4.5 are 61,000-90,000 while 2 or 4.5 percent are

in 91,000-120,000.

Table 7. Distribution of Respondents according to their Monthly

Income

Monthly Income Frequency Percentage

10, 000 – 30,000 34 77.3

31,000 – 60, 000 6 13.6

61, 000 – 90, 000 2 4.5

91, 000 – 120, 000 2 4.5

Total 44 100

The extent of the respondents adhere to the following dimensions of

organizational culture in terms of:

Dominant Characteristics

Table 8 shows the responses of respondents on dominant

characteristics. As shown in the table the organization is a very personal

place. It is like an extended family. People seem to share a lot of themselves

has a weighted mean of 4.27 with the description of often. The organization

is a very dynamic and entrepreneurial place. People are willing to stick their

necks out and take risks has a weighted mean of 4.02 with the description of

often. While the organization is a very results-oriented. A major concern is

with getting the job done. People are very competitive and achievement-

oriented has a weighted mean of 4.25 with the description of often. The

organization is a very controlled and structured place. Formal procedures

generally govern what people do has a weighted mean of 4.06 with the

description of often. The organization is offering a healthy environment in

the workplace. It understands that it takes a collaborative effort to compete

in market segment and produce continuous profits has a weighted mean of

3.98 with the description of often. While the organization is goal-oriented.

Management shares goals with employees and gets them on board with the

mission and vision of the organization has a weighted mean of 4.34 with the

description of often. The organization is good in promoting teamwork.

Employees and managers readily offer their assistance to each other to meet

corporate objectives has a weighted mean of 3.95 with the description of

often and lastly the organization is possessing high employee morale.

Employees value their positions in the organizations and desire to work there

for a long time has a weighted mean of 4.25 with the description of Often.

Thus, faculty and staff are often in terms of dominant characteristics with the

overall mean of 4.14.

Table 8. Mean Distribution of Respondents on Dominant

Characteristics
Mea Descriptio
Items
n n

1. The organization is a very personal place. It is like 4.27

an extended family. People seem to share a lot of
themselves.
 Often

2. The organization is a very dynamic and Often

entrepreneurial place. People are willing to stick their 4.02
necks out and take risks.
3. The organization is a very results-oriented. A major Often
concern is with getting the job done. People are very 4.25
competitive and achievement-oriented.
4. The organization is a very controlled and structured Often
place. Formal procedures generally govern what 4.06
people do.
5. The organization is offering a healthy environment Often
in the workplace. It understands that it takes a
3.97
collaborative effort to compete in market segment and
produce continuous profits.
6. The organization is goal-oriented. Management Often
shares goals with employees and gets them on board 4.34
with the mission and vision of the organization.
7. The organization is good in promoting teamwork. Often
Employees and managers readily offer their 3.95
assistance to each other to meet corporate objectives.
8. The organization is possessing high employee 4.25 Often
morale. Employees value their positions in the
organizations and desire to work there for a long time.
Overall Mean 4.14 Often

Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never
Organizational Leadership
 Table 9 shows the responses of respondents on organizational

leadership. As shown below, the leadership in the organization is generally

considered to exemplify mentoring, facilitating, or nurturing has a weighted

mean of 4.11 with the description of often. The leadership in the organization

is generally considered to exemplify mentoring, facilitating, or nurturing has

a weighted mean of 4.00 with the description often. While the leadership in

the organization is generally considered to exemplify a non- sense,

aggressive, results-oriented focus has a weighted mean of 4.00 with the

description often. The leadership in the organization is generally considered

to exemplify coordinating, organizing, or smooth-running efficiency has a

weighted mean of 4.25 with the description of often. The leadership in the

organization offers dual focused management approach that works towards

what is best for individuals and what is best for a group as a whole

simultaneously has a weighted mean of 4.09 with the description of often.

The leadership in the organization requires developing an understanding of

your own worldview as well as the worldviews of others has a weighted mean

of 4.06 with the description of often. The leadership in the organization

capitalizing on strengths and managing around weaknesses which strength

can be defined as consistent, near perfect performance in an activity has a

weighted mean of 4.00 with the description of often and lastly the leadership

in the organization requires ethics which aids leaders in balancing truth and

loyalty, individuals and community, short-term and long-term, and justice

has a weighted mean of 4.15 with the description of often. Thus, faculty and
staff are often in terms of organizational leadership with the overall mean of

4.08.

Table 9. Mean Distribution of Respondents according Organizational

Leadership

Descriptio
Items Mean
n

1. The leadership in the organization is generally Often

considered to exemplify mentoring, facilitating, or 4.11
nurturing.
2. The leadership in the organization is generally Often
considered to exemplify entrepreneurship, innovation, or 4.00
risk taking.
3. The leadership in the organization is generally Often
considered to exemplify a non- sense, aggressive, 4.00
results-oriented focus.
4. The leadership in the organization is generally Often
considered to exemplify coordinating, organizing, or 4.25
smooth-running efficiency.
5. The leadership in the organization offers dual focused Often
management approach that works towards what is best
4.09
for individuals and what is best for a group as a whole
simultaneously.
6. The leadership in the organization requires developing Often
an understanding of your own worldview as well as the 4.06
worldviews of others.
7. The leadership in the organization capitalizing on Often
strengths and managing around weaknesses which
4.00
strength can be defined as consistent, near perfect
performance in an activity.
8. The leadership in the organization requires ethics Often
which aids leaders in balancing truth and loyalty,
4.15
individuals and community, short-term and long-term,
and justice.
Overall Mean 4.08 Often
Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never
Management of Employees

Table 10 shows the mean distribution of respondents according

managing employees. As shown below, the management style in the

organization is characterized by teamwork, consensus, and participation has

a weighted mean of 4.04 with the description of often. The management

style in the organization is characterized by individual risk taking, innovation,

freedom, and uniqueness has a weighted mean of 4.09 with the description

often. While the management style in the organization is characterized by

hard-driving competitiveness, high demands, and achievement has a

weighted mean of 4.06 with the description often. The management style in

the organization is characterized by security of employment, conformity,

predictability, and stability in relationships has a weighted mean of 4.09 with

the description of often. The management style in the organization is

characterized staffing what their priorities are, knowing when deliverables

are due, and addressing the problem when an employee fails to meet

assigned deadlines has a weighted mean of 4.11 with the description of

often. The management style in the organization is characterized by learning

how to properly delegate work enabling every for other managerial

responsibilities to be accomplished while also helping subordinates develop

important skills has a weighted mean of 4.09 with the description of often.

The management style in the organization is characterized by valuing

feedback and making each one aware that there’s always room for

improvement has a weighted mean of 3.97 with the description of often and

lastly the management style in the organization is characterized by

enhancing fundamental problem solving skills and that employees know

when to seek input from others has a weighted mean of 3.93 with the

description of often. Thus, faculty and staff are often in terms of

management of employees with the overall mean of 4.05.

Table 10. Mean Distribution of Respondents according to

Management of Employees

Descriptio
Items Mean
n

1. The management style in the organization is Often

4.04
characterized by teamwork, consensus, and participation.
2. The management style in the organization is Often
characterized by individual risk taking, innovation, 4.09
freedom, and uniqueness.
3. The management style in the organization is Often
characterized by hard-driving competitiveness, high 4.06
demands, and achievement.
4. The management style in the organization is Often
characterized by security of employment, conformity, 4.09
predictability, and stability in relationships.
5. The management style in the organization is 4.11 Often
characterized staffing what their priorities are, knowing
when deliverables are due, and addressing the problem
when an employee fails to meet assigned deadlines.
6. The management style in the organization is Often
characterized by learning how to properly delegate work
enabling every for other managerial responsibilities to be 4.09
accomplished while also helping subordinates develop
important skills.
7. The management style in the organization is Often
characterized by valuing feedback and making each one 3.97
aware that there’s always room for improvement.
8. The management style in the organization is Often
characterized by enhancing fundamental problem solving
3.93
skills and that employees know when to seek input from
others.
Overall Mean 4.05 often

Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never
Organizational Glue

Table 11 shows the mean distribution of respondents according

managing employees. As shown below, the glue that holds the organization

together is loyalty and mutual trust. Commitment to this organization runs

high has a weighted mean of 4.06 with the description of often. The glue that

holds the organization together is commitment to innovation and

development. There is an emphasis on being on the cutting edge has a

weighted mean of 4.11 with the description often. While the glue that holds
the organization together is the emphasis on achievement and goal

accomplishment has a weighted mean of 4.22 with the description often. The

glue that holds the organization together is formal rules and policies.

Maintaining smooth-running organization is important has a weighted mean

of 4.06 with the description of often. The glue that holds the organization

together is an edifice that provides a clear governance structure, roles and

responsibilities, and visibility of areas of importance to the all levels of work

has a weighted mean of 4.04 with the description of often. The glue that

holds the organization together is a consistent approach to workflow and

designing processes that ensures a high quality to accomplish the

organization’s goals effectively has a weighted mean of 4.13 with the

description of often. The glue that holds the organization together is a

culture that fosters performance, innovation, productivity, employee

engagement, teamwork and excitement for future has a weighted mean of

4.09 with the description of often and lastly the glue that holds the

organization together is hiring the right people for the right role, developing

talent from within, and capitalizing on strength of employees to support both

the individual and the organizations has a weighted mean of 3.95 with the

description of often. Thus, faculty and staff are often in terms of

organizational glue with the overall mean of 4.08.

 Table 11. Mean Distribution of Respondents according to their
Organizational Glue

Mea Descriptio
Items
n n

1. The glue that holds the organization together is loyalty Often

and mutual trust. Commitment to this organization runs 4.06
high.
2. The glue that holds the organization together is Often
commitment to innovation and development. There is an 4.11
emphasis on being on the cutting edge.
3. The glue that holds the organization together is the Often
4.22
emphasis on achievement and goal accomplishment.
4. The glue that holds the organization together is formal Often
rules and policies. Maintaining smooth-running 4.06
organization is important.
5. The glue that holds the organization together is an Often
edifice that provides a clear governance structure, roles
4.04
and responsibilities, and visibility of areas of importance
to the all levels of work.
6. The glue that holds the organization together is a Often
consistent approach to workflow and designing processes
4.13
that ensures a high quality to accomplish the
organization’s goals effectively.
7. The glue that holds the organization together is a Often
culture that fosters performance, innovation, productivity,
4.09
employee engagement, teamwork and excitement for
future.
8. The glue that holds the organization together is hiring Often
the right people for the right role, developing talent from
3.95
within, and capitalizing on strength of employees to
support both the individual and the organizations.
Overall Mean 4.08 Often

Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
 4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never

Strategic Emphasis

Table 12 shows the mean distribution of respondents according to

strategic emphasis. As shown below, the organization emphasizes human

development. High trust, openness, and participation persist has a weighted

mean of 4.04 with the description of often. The organization emphasizes

acquiring new resources and creating new challenges. Trying new things and

prospecting for opportunities are valued has a weighted mean of 4.11 with

the description often. While the organization emphasizes competitive actions

and achievement. Hitting stretch targets and winning in the marketplace are

dominant has a weighted mean of 4.02 with the description often. The

organization emphasizes permanence and stability. Efficiency, control, and

smooth operations are important has a weighted mean of 4.13 with the

description of often. The organization emphasizes strategic direction of the

organization. Realistic activities in developing a long-term vision are offered

has a weighted mean of 4.06 with the description of often. The organization

emphasizes exploiting and maintaining core competencies. Core

competencies which are the resources and capabilities that serve as an

organizations’ source of competitive advantage are given attention has a

weighted mean of 4.18 with the description of often. The organization

emphasizes developing human capital. Knowledge and skills of the

organization’s work force are developed has a weighted mean of 4.20 with

the description of often and lastly the organization emphasizes effective

corporate culture. Core values are shared by all or most employees

consisting of a complex set of shared ideologies, symbols, and values that

influence the way the organization conducts its services has a weighted

mean of 4.04 with the description of often. Thus, faculty and staff are often

in terms of strategic emphasis with the overall mean of 4.10.

Table 12. Mean Distribution of Respondents according to Strategic

Emphasis

Mea Descriptio
Items
n n

1. The organization emphasizes human development. High Often

4.04
trust, openness, and participation persist.
2. The organization emphasizes acquiring new resources Often
and creating new challenges. Trying new things and 4.11
prospecting for opportunities are valued.
3. The organization emphasizes competitive actions and Often
achievement. Hitting stretch targets and winning in the 4.02
marketplace are dominant.
4. The organization emphasizes permanence and stability. Often
4.13
Efficiency, control, and smooth operations are important.
5. The organization emphasizes strategic direction of the Often
organization. Realistic activities in developing a long-term 4.06
vision are offered.
6. The organization emphasizes exploiting and maintaining 4.18 Often
core competencies. Core competencies which are the
resources and capabilities that serve as an organizations’
source of competitive advantage are given attention.
7. The organization emphasizes developing human capital. Often
Knowledge and skills of the organization’s work force are 4.20
developed.
8. The organization emphasizes effective corporate culture. Often
Core values are shared by all or most employees consisting
of a complex set of shared ideologies, symbols, and values 4.04
that influence the way the organization conducts its
services.
Overall Mean 4.1 Often
0
Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never
Criteria of Success

Table 13 shows the mean distribution of respondents according to

criteria of success. As shown below, the organization defines success on the

basis of the development of human resources, teamwork, employee

commitment, and concern for people has a weighted mean of 4.18 with the

description of often. The organization defines success on the basis of having

the most unique or newest products. It is a product leader and innovator has

a weighted mean of 4.00 with the description often. The organization defines

success on the basis of winning in the marketplace and outpacing the

 competition. Competitive market leadership is key has a weighted mean of

4.13 with the description often. The organization defines success on the

basis of efficiency. Dependable delivery, smooth-scheduling, and low-cost

production are critical has a weighted mean of 4.25 with the description of

often. The organization defines success on the basis of attaining vision of all

the composing workers which is the overarching dream for which and

organization aims has a weighted mean of 4.18 with the description of often.

The organization defines success on the basis gaining a sustainable service.

It has strategic plan that speaks to the mission, vision, goals and niche of the

organization has a weighted mean of 4.29 with the description of often. The

organization defines success on the basis of designing and establishing new

ways of operating, of relating one another and, of getting work done has a

weighted mean of 4.15 with the description of often and lastly the

organization defines success on the basis of using the architecture of the

organization to translate business strategy into operational reality has a

weighted mean of 4.06 with the description of often. Thus, faculty and staff

are often in terms of criteria of success with the overall mean of 4.15.

Table 13. Mean Distribution of Respondents according to Criteria of

Success

Mea Descriptio
Items
n n

1. The organization defines success on the basis of the 4.18 Often

development of human resources, teamwork, employee
commitment, and concern for people.
2. The organization defines success on the basis of having Often
the most unique or newest products. It is a product leader 4.00
and innovator.
3. The organization defines success on the basis of winning Often
in the marketplace and outpacing the competition. 4.13
Competitive market leadership is key.
4. The organization defines success on the basis of Often
efficiency. Dependable delivery, smooth-scheduling, and 4.25
low-cost production are critical.
5. The organization defines success on the basis of Often
attaining vision of all the composing workers which is the 4.18
overarching dream for which and organization aims.
6. The organization defines success on the basis gaining a Often
sustainable service. It has strategic plan that speaks to the 4.29
mission, vision, goals and niche of the organization.
7. The organization defines success on the basis of Often
designing and establishing new ways of operating, of 4.15
relating one another and, of getting work done.
8. The organization defines success on the basis of using Often
the architecture of the organization to translate business 4.06
strategy into operational reality.
Overall Mean 4.1 Often
5
Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never
 The following discussion tells us about the level of work
performance of USeP-CDM employee in terms of:
Task Performance Scale

Table 14 shows the mean distribution of respondents according to

criteria of success. As shown below, I managed to plan my work so that it

was done on time has a weighted mean of 4.79 with the description of

always. My planning was optimal has a weighted mean of 4.50 with the

description always. I kept in mind the results that I had to achieve in my work

has a weighted mean of 4.72 with the description always. I knew how to set

the right priorities has a 0 weighted mean. I was able to perform my work

well with minimal time and effort has a weighted mean of 4.61 with the

description of always. The organization defines success on the basis gaining

a sustainable service. It has strategic plan that speaks to the mission, vision,

goals and niche of the organization has a weighted mean of 4.29 with the

description of always and lastly Collaboration with others was very

productive has a weighted mean of 4.54 with the description of always. Thus,

faculty and staff are always task performance scale with the overall mean of

4.52.

Table 14. Mean Distribution of Respondents according to their Task

Performance Scale

Descriptio
Items Mean
n

1. I managed to plan my work so that it was done on time. 4.79 Always

2. My planning was optimal. 4.50 Always
3. I kept in mind the results that I had to achieve in my Always
4.72
work.
5. I knew how to set the right priorities. 0 0
6. I was able to perform my work well with minimal time Always
4.61
and effort.
7. Collaboration with others was very productive. 4.54 Always
Overall Mean 4.52 Always

Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never
Collaboration with others was very productive

Table 15 shows the mean distribution of respondents according to

collaboration with others was very productive. As shown below, I took on

extra responsibilities has a weighted mean of 4.65 with the description of

always. I started new tasks myself, when my old ones were finished has a

weighted mean of 4.43 with the description often I took on challenging work

tasks, when available has a weighted mean of 4.40 with the description

often. I worked at keeping my job knowledge up-to-date has a weighted

mean 4.52 with the description of always. I worked at keeping my job skills

up-to-date has a weighted mean of 4.61 with the description of always. I

came up with creative solutions to new problems has a weighted mean of

 4.36 with the description of often. While I kept looking for new challenges in

my job has a weighted mean of 4.18 with the description of often. I did more

than was expected of me has a weighted mean of 4.38 with the description

often. I actively participated in work meetings has a weighted mean of 4.54

with the description always. I actively looked for ways to improve my

performance at work has a weighted mean 4.61 with the description of

always. I grasped opportunities when they presented themselves has a

weighted mean of 4.43 with the description of often and lastly I knew how to

solve difficult situations and setbacks quickly has a weighted mean of 4.43

with the description of often. Thus, faculty and staff are often in collaboration

with others with the overall mean of 4.46.

Table 15. Mean Distribution of Respondents according to

Collaboration with others was very productive

Descriptio
Items Mean
n

1. I took on extra responsibilities. 4.65 Always

2. I started new tasks myself, when my old ones were Often
4.43
finished.
3. I took on challenging work tasks, when available. 4.40 Often
4. I worked at keeping my job knowledge up-to-date. 4.52 Always
5. I worked at keeping my job skills up-to-date. 4.61 Always
6. I came up with creative solutions to new problems. 4.36 Often
7. I kept looking for new challenges in my job. 4.18 Often
8. I did more than was expected of me. 4.38 Often
9. I actively participated in work meetings 4.54 Always
 10. I actively looked for ways to improve my performance Always
4.61
at work.
11. I grasped opportunities when they presented Often
4.43
themselves.
12. I knew how to solve difficult situations and setbacks Often
4.43
quickly.
Overall Mean 4.46 Often

Legend
Interval Descriptio
n
4.5-5 Always
3.5-4.49 Often
2.5-3.49 Sometime
s
1.5-2.49 Seldom
1.0-1.49 Never

Is there a significant relationship between organizational culture and work

performance of USeP-CDM employee?
R/P Task Work
Organizational Culture Value Performance Collaboration Performance
R Value .523** .442** .530**
Dominant Characteristics P Value 0 0.003 0.00
Organizational R Value .466** .371* .459**
Leadership P Value 0.001 0.013 0.002
R Value .447** .432** .482**
Management Employees P Value 0.002 0.003 0.001
R Value .481** .368* .466**
Organizational Glue P Value 0.001 0.014 0.001
R Value .472** .446** .504**
Strategic Emphasis P Value 0.001 0.002 0.00
R Value .478** .527** .551**
Criteria of Success P Value 0.001 0 0.00
R Value .512** .468** .538**
Over All P Value 0 0.001 0.00
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).