Scribd
Upload
4 views1 page

14 Language Teaching Methods Compared

The document provides a comparative summary of 14 language teaching methods, highlighting key differences in their approaches to language acquisition. It emphasizes various aspects such as the focus on writing versus speaking, the role of the teacher, and the importance of fluency and communication. Each method is characterized by its unique structure, adaptability, and learner-centeredness.

Uploaded by

nguyenthihanhtrang
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views1 page

14 Language Teaching Methods Compared

The document provides a comparative summary of 14 language teaching methods, highlighting key differences in their approaches to language acquisition. It emphasizes various aspects such as the focus on writing versus speaking, the role of the teacher, and the importance of fluency and communication. Each method is characterized by its unique structure, adaptability, and learner-centeredness.

Uploaded by

nguyenthihanhtrang
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Comparative Summary of 14 Language Teaching Methods

mmary (Main Ideas & Keywords) Key Differences

writing prioritized over speaking. Emphasizes written language and grammar accuracy, not communication or fluency.

mmar. Contrasts GTM by avoiding native language and focusing on oral fluency.

Strongly focuses on drills and mimicry, unlike DM’s natural communication.

Similar to ALM but more context-based.

Prioritizes fluency and real communication, unlike GTM or ALM.

Very kinesthetic; great for beginners.

Teacher's role is minimal. Focus on autonomy.

Highly psychological and emotional.

Humanistic and emotional security focused.

Strongly learner-centered and task-first.

e.g., grammar), then guides students through controlled practice, and finally gives them opportunities to produce the language freely. Highly structured with clear stages: first accuracy, then fluency. More traditional and teacher-led.

The order of stages can vary to suit lesson aims and student motivation. Non-linear, adaptable to learners' mood and context. Emphasizes engagement and fluency.

m contexts. It is not fixed and evolves with teaching experience and student feedback. Highly adaptive and context-sensitive. Uses best practices from multiple approaches.

ductively in meaningful contexts. Based on behaviorist psychology and structural linguistics, it promotes accuracy through pattern drills and real-life situations. Combines structural accuracy with situational context. Precursor to Audio-Lingual and CLT approaches, but mo

You might also like