0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Cauchy Criterion & Bolzano-Weierstrass Problems

The document contains a set of practice problems focused on the Cauchy criterion and the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, including various sequences and their properties. It provides proofs, counterexamples, and hints for each problem, addressing convergence, boundedness, and subsequences. Additionally, it discusses the implications of having peaks in sequences and concludes with a note for reporting any errors.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Cauchy Criterion & Bolzano-Weierstrass Problems

The document contains a set of practice problems focused on the Cauchy criterion and the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, including various sequences and their properties. It provides proofs, counterexamples, and hints for each problem, addressing convergence, boundedness, and subsequences. Additionally, it discusses the implications of having peaks in sequences and concludes with a note for reporting any errors.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Practice Problems 4: Cauchy criterion, Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

1. Show that (xn ) satisfies the Cauchy criterion where (xn ) is defined as
1
(a) x1 = 2 and xn+1 = 2 + xn for all n ∈ N;
1
(b) x1 = 1 and xn+1 = 2+x2n
for all n ∈ N;
1 2
(c) x1 = 1 and xn+1 = 6 (xn + 8) for all n ∈ N.

2. Let (xn ) satisfy the Cauchy criterion. Show that (xn ) is bounded.

3. Let (xn ) be a sequence of positive real numbers. Prove or disprove the following statements.

(a) If xn+1 − xn → 0 then (xn ) converges.


(b) If |xn+2 − xn+1 | < |xn+1 − xn | for all n ∈ N then (xn ) converges.
(c) If (xn ) satisfies the Cauchy criterion, then there exists an α ∈ R such that 0 < α < 1
and |xn+1 − xn | ≤ α|xn − xn−1 | for all n ∈ N.

4. Let (xn ) be a sequence of integers such that xn+1 6= xn for all n ∈ N. Prove or disprove the
following statements.

(a) The sequence (xn ) does not satisfy the Cauchy criterion.
(b) The sequence (xn ) cannot have a convergent subsequence.

5. Suppose that 0 < α < 1 and that (xn ) is a sequence satisfying the condition:
|xn+1 − xn | ≤ αn , n = 1, 2, 3, . . . . Show that (xn ) satisfies the Cauchy criterion.
n+1
6. Let (xn ) be defined by x1 = 1
1! , x2 = 1
1! − 2!1 , ..., xn = 1
1! − 2!1 + ... + (−1)n! for n ∈ N. Show
that (xn ) converges.

7. Let 1 ≤ x1 ≤ x2 ≤ 2 and xn+2 = xn+1 xn , for n ∈ N.
xn+1 1 2
(a) Show that xn ≥ 2 , |xn+1 − xn | ≤ 3 |xn − xn−1 | for all n ∈ N and (xn ) converges.
(b) Observe that x2n+2 xn+1 = x2n+1 xn for all n ∈ N and find the limit of (xn ).
xn+1 +xn
8. Let x1 = 1, x2 = 2 and xn+2 = 2 for all n ∈ N. Using the nested interval theorem,
show that (xn ) converges .

9. (*) Show that a sequence (xn ) has no convergent subsequence if and only if |xn | → ∞.

10. (*) Show that a sequence (xn ) is bounded if and only if every subsequence of (xn ) has a
convergent subsequence.

11. (*) Let (xn ) be a sequence in R. We say that a positive integer n is a peak of (xn ) if
xn > xm whenever m > n (i.e., if xn is greater than every subsequent term of (xn )).

(a) If (xn ) has infinitely many peaks, show that it has a decreasing subsequence.
(b) If (xn ) has only finitely many peaks, show that it has an increasing subsequence.
(c) From (a) and (b) conclude that every sequence in R has a monotone subsequence.
Further, conclude that every bounded sequence in R has a convergent subsequence
(This is an alternate proof of the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem).

Please write to psraj@[Link] if any typos/mistakes are found in this set of practice problems/solutions/hints.
Practice Problems 4: Hints/Solutions
−xn
1. (a) Note that |xn+1 − xn | = | x1n − xn−1
1
| = | xxn−1
n xn−1
| ≤ 14 |xn−1 − xn |. Hence (xn ) satisfies
the contractive condition and therefore it satisfies the Cauchy criterion.
|x2n −x2n−1 | |xn −xn−1 ||xn +xn−1 |
(b) Observe that |xn+1 − xn | = (2+x2n )(2+x2n−1 )
≤ 4 ≤ 24 |xn − xn−1 |.
|xn −xn−1 ||xn +xn−1 |
(c) We have |xn+1 − xn | ≤ 6 ≤ 46 |xn − xn−1 |.
2. Since (xn ) satisfies the Cauchy criterion, there exists N ∈ N such that |xn − xN | < 1 for all
n ≥ N . Hence |xn | ≤ max{|x1 |, |x2 |, · · · , |xN −1 |, 1 + |xN |} for all n ∈ N.
√ 1 √
3. (a) False. Choose xn = n and observe that xn+1 − xn = √n+1+ n
→ 0.
√ √ √ 1 √
(b) False. For xn = n, |xn+2 − xn+1 | = | n + 2 − n + 1| < √n+1+ n
= |xn+1 − xn |.
(c) False. Take xn = n1 . If for some α > 0, | n+1
1
− n1 | ≤ α| n1 − 1
n−1 | for all n ∈ N, then
n−1
n+1 ≤ α. Allow n → ∞ to get α ≥ 1.

4. (a) True. Because |xn+1 − xn | 9 0 as n → ∞.


(b) False. Consider xn = (−1)n .
5. For n > m, we have |xn − xm | ≤ |xn − xn−1 | + |xn−1 − xn−2 | + · · · + |xm+1 − xm |
αm
≤ αn−1 + αn−2 + · · · + αm = αm [1 + α + · · · + αn−1−m ]≤ 1−α → 0 as m → ∞.
Thus (xn ) satisfies the Cauchy criterion.
1
6. Observe that |xn+1 − xn | ≤ (n+1)! ≤ ( 12 )n . Apply Problem 5.

7. Since 1 ≤ xn ≤ 2, xxn+1n
≥ 12 . Observe that x2n+1 − x2n = xn xn−1 − x2n = xn (xn−1 − xn ). Thus
xn 2
|xn+1 − xn | = | xn+1 +xn ||xn−1 − xn | ≤ 3 |xn − xn−1 |.

8. Define [a1 , b1 ] = [x1 , x2 ], [a2 , b2 ] = [x3 , x2 ], [a3 , b3 ] = [x3 , x4 ], [a4 , b4 ] = [x5 , x4 ], · · · and
apply the nested interval theorem.
9. Suppose |xn | → ∞. If (xnk ) is a subsequence of (xn ), then observe that |xnk | → ∞ as
k → ∞. To prove the converse, let |xn | 9 ∞. Then there exists M > 0 such that for
every N ∈ N, we find n > N such that |xn | < M . Hence there exists n1 > 1 such that
|xn1 | < M . Similarly, there exists n2 > n1 such that |xn2 | < M . This way, we find a
bounded subsequence (xnk ) of (xn ). Hence by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, (xnk ) has a
convergent subsequence and therefore (xn ) has a convergent subsequence.
10. Suppose (xn ) is bounded. Then by the Bolzano-Weirestrass theorem, every subsequence of
(xn ) has a convergent subsequence. To prove the converse, suppose (xn ) is not bounded
then there exists a subsequence (xnk ) of (xn ) such that |xnk | → ∞. Observe that (xnk )
cannot have a convergent subsequence.
11. (a) Suppose (xn ) has infinitely many peaks. Let n1 be the first peak and n2 be the second
and so on. Thus all the peaks can be listed as n1 < n2 < n3 < .... Note that the subsequence
(xnk ) is decreasing.
(b) Suppose there are only finite peaks and let N be the last peak. Since n1 = N + 1 is
not a peak, there exists n2 > n1 such that xn2 ≥ xn1 . Since n2 > N , n2 is not a peak and
hence there exists n3 > n2 such that xn3 ≥ xn2 . This way, we find an increasing subsequence
(xnk ).
(c) This follows immediately from (a) and (b).

Common questions

Powered by AI

If a sequence has only finitely many peaks, it means that after a certain index, the terms cannot be peaks anymore, facilitating the construction of an increasing subsequence. Thus, the existence of only finitely many peaks implies the sequence has an increasing subsequence .

A bounded sequence implies, per the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, that every subsequence of it must have a convergent subsequence. Boundedness limits the range of subsequences, preventing divergence to infinity, thus ensuring at least one subsequence converges .

If a sequence has infinitely many peaks, it allows us to construct a subsequence composed entirely of these peaks. As each peak is greater than all subsequent terms, this subsequence will be a strictly decreasing sequence .

The sequence xn = 1/n does not satisfy the Cauchy criterion under the condition |xn+1 − xn| ≤ α|xn − xn−1| for any α ∈ (0, 1). Substituting, we get n−1/n+1 ≤ α, leading as n → ∞ to α ≥ 1, violating the condition α < 1 .

Applying the nested interval theorem involves defining successive intervals from the terms of the sequence, where each interval [an, bn] shrinks and contains the nth term. With the sequence given by xn+2 = (xn+1 + xn)/2, we see shrinking intervals form between any two consecutive terms, ensuring eventual overlap at a single point indicating sequence convergence .

A sequence satisfying a contractive condition, such as |xn+1 − xn| ≤ α|xn − xn−1| with 0 < α < 1, implies that distances between consecutive sequence terms reduce geometrically. This is a stronger condition than just meeting the Cauchy criterion, ensuring that the sequence is Cauchy .

A sequence has no convergent subsequence if and only if its absolute terms diverge to infinity, |xn| → ∞. This suggests that any subsequence chosen will also diverge, making convergence impossible .

Every sequence of real numbers has a monotone subsequence. The significance lies in it being a foundational proof concept for the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, providing an alternate route to showing that every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence .

The Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem states that every bounded sequence in the real numbers has a convergent subsequence. This means that if a sequence is bounded, there is always at least one subsequence that approaches a specific limit .

A sequence that satisfies the Cauchy criterion implies that for large indices, the elements become arbitrarily close to each other. This closeness prevents the sequence from having widely diverging values, thereby ensuring that it is bounded .

You might also like