References (First section )

 Al-Haq, F. A. A., & Ahmed, A. S. (1994). Discourse problems

in argumentative writing. World Englishes, 13(3), 307–323.1
 Allen, L. K., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Writing
flexibility in argumentative essays: A multidimensional
analysis. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1975–
2002. [Link]
 Atkinson, D. (2018). Second language writing: Process,
product, and pedagogy. Routledge.1
 Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of
social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre
and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). Taylor & Francis.1
 Benson, P., et al. (1992). Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T.
(2008). A Synthesis of Research on Second Language Writing in
English (1st ed.).
Routledge. [Link]
 Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in
professional settings. Longman.1
 Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-
based view. Continuum.1
 Biria, R., & Karimi, M. N. (2015). The effect of pre-task
planning on writing performance. International Journal of
Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(3), 123–130.1
 Bracewell, R. J. (1980). Written composition: Toward a theory
of evaluation. Instructional Science, 9(1), 55–77.1
 Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computational
assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal
of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 119–135.1
 Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2016). Genre-based approach: What and how
to teach and to learn writing. English Language Teaching, 9(9),
45–51.1
 Dobao, A. F., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2
classrooms: Comparing group, pair, and individual
work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 484–504.1
 Doolan, S. M., & Miller, D. (2012). Generation 1.5 writing
compared to L1 and L2 writing in first-year
composition. Written Communication, 29(4), 439–474.1
 Ebrahimi, M. R., Nezami, A., & Kargozari, H. (2019). The
impact of pre-task planning vs. on-line planning on writing
performance: A test of accuracy, fluency, and
complexity. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2),
254–263.
 Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency,
complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative
writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84.1
 Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders.
National Council of Teachers of English.1
 Farahani, A. A. K., & Faryabi, M. (2016). The effect of pre-task
planning on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Journal
of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 108–117.1
 Farvardin, M. T. (2009). [Details not provided.]
 Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of
writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–
387.1
 Foley, J. A., & Thompson, L. (2013). Language learning: A
lifelong process. Routledge.1
 Granger, S., & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English
essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers. World
Englishes, 15(1), 17–27.1
 Guerrero-Gomez, A., et al. (2024). [No bibliographic record
found.]
 Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The
social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.1
 Hasan, M. K., & Akhand, M. M. (2010). Approaches to writing
in EFL/ESL context: Balancing product and process in writing
class at tertiary level. Journal of NELTA, 15(1-2), 77–88.1
 Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for
ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722.1
 Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative
essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66–78.1
 Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge
University Press.1
 Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L., & Acevedo, A. (2012). The effect
of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical
 complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 21(3), 264–282.
 Kaur, S., et al. (2018). [No direct reference found.]
 Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing
performance: Effects of rough draft and outline
strategies. Written Communication, 5(4), 446–459.1
 Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a
function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology,
103(3), 327–342.1
 Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing.
In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp.
57–71). Lawrence Erlbaum.1
 Khezrlou, S. (2020). The effects of pre-task planning on EFL
learners’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research,
24(5), 563–584.1
 Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2
undergraduate student argumentative writing. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 33, 21–34.1
 Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A Synthesis of
Research on Second Language Writing in English (1st ed.).
Routledge. [Link]
 Lin, W. (2013). [Details not provided.]
 Lowry, P. B., et al. (2004). Understanding the determinants of
collaborative writing performance. IEEE Transactions on
Professional Communication, 47(4), 243–253.1
 Manchón, R. M., et al. (2007). [Details not provided.]
 Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy—Modeling context in
educational settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13,
141–172.1
 Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: ‘Genre-based’
literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the
shaping of consciousness (pp. 123–155). Continuum.1
 Meraji, S. M. (2011). [No bibliographic record found.]
 Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal
of Speech, 70(2), 151–167.1
 Mojavezi, A., & Afghari, A. (2015). The effect of pre-task
planning on EFL learners’ writing. International Journal of
Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(2), 49–62.1
 Murray, D. M. (1980). Writing as process: How writing finds its
own meaning. In T. R. Donovan & B. W. McClelland
(Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 3–20).
National Council of Teachers of English.1
 Nagao, A. (2018). The impact of the genre-based approach on
EFL writing development. English Language Teaching, 11(6),
136–148.1
 Nagao, A. (2019). Systemic functional linguistics and genre-
based writing instruction. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 41, 100768.1
 Nagao, A. (2020). [Details not provided.]
 Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms: A guide
for teacher-initiated action. Prentice Hall.1
 Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Heinle
& Heinle.1
 Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the
fluency and lexical complexity in EFL argumentative
writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 218–233.1
 Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A
case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34(4), 566–
585.1
 Ozfidan, B., & Mitchell, R. (2020). [Details not provided.]
 Paltridge, B., et al. (2009). Teaching academic writing: An
introduction for teachers of second language writers. University
of Michigan Press.1
 Park, T. (1986). [Details not provided.]
 Perl, S. (1980). Understanding composing. College Composition
and Communication, 31(4), 363–369.1
 Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The effects of collaborative writing on
EFL learners’ writing fluency. Asian EFL Journal, 28(2), 104–
126.1
 Rahimi, M. (2016). The impact of pre-task planning on EFL
learners’ writing performance. Journal of Language Teaching
and Research, 7(3), 495–502.1
 Rahimpour, M., & Nariman-Jahan, R. (2011). The effect of
planning on L2 learners’ written performance. Journal of
Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 706–714.1
 Rahimpour, M., & Safarie, M. (2011). The effects of planning
on writing performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 29, 1950–1959.1
 Rahmatunisa, W. (2014). Problems faced by EFL learners in
writing argumentative essay. English Review: Journal of English
Education, 3(1), 41–49.1
 Rico, G. L. (1983). Writing the natural way: Using right-brain
techniques to release your expressive powers. Tarcher.1
 Roca de Larios, J., et al. (2008). [Details not provided.]
 Rostamian, M., et al. (2018). [No bibliographic record found.]
 Saeidi, M., & Sahebkheir, F. (2011). The effect of
product/process-oriented approach to teaching and learning
writing skill on university students’ writing performance. Theory
and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1307–1316.1
 Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing
processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 9(3), 259–291.1
 Sarratea, G. V. G. (2019). [No bibliographic record found.]
 Schneer, D. (2014). A pedagogical framework for
counterargument in argumentative writing. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 23, 34–50.1
 Shahmohammadi, R., et al. (2021). [No bibliographic record
found.]
 Shahriari, H., & Shadloo, M. (2019). Engagement markers in
EFL learners’ argumentative writing. Journal of Language and
Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 85–99.1
 Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction:
Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll
(Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the
classroom (pp. 11–23). Cambridge University Press.1
 Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature
of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL
Quarterly, 27(4), 657–677.1
 Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and
experienced adult writers. College Composition and
Communication, 31(4), 378–388.1
 Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. In J. I. Liontas
(Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language
teaching (pp. 1–7). Wiley.1
 Suryana, D., & Iskander, A. (2015). The effectiveness of
product-based approach in teaching writing. International
Journal of Education and Research, 3(3), 205–216.1
 Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and
research settings. Cambridge University Press.1
 Tabari, M. A. (2016). The effect of pre-task planning on Iranian
EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Applied
Linguistics and Language Research, 3(6), 224–237.1
 Tabari, M. A., & Wang, Y. (2023). Assessing linguistic
complexity features in L2 writing: Understanding effects of topic
familiarity and strategic planning within the realm of task
readiness. Assessing Writing, 57,
100749. [Link]
 Abdi Tabari, M., & Golparvar, S. E. (2024). Cohesion in L2
writing: Assessing the role of pre-task planning and topic
familiarity. In Planning and Task Performance in a Second
Language (pp. 205–230). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
 Tangpermpoon, T. (2008). Integrated approaches to improve
students’ writing skills for English major students. ABAC
Journal, 28(2), 1–9.1
 Tribble, C. (2003). Teaching writing: A practical guide.
Routledge.1
 Vilarreal, G. V., & Gil Sarratea, G. (2019). [No bibliographic
record found.]
 Victori, M. (1999). An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL
composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective
writers. System, 27(4), 537–555.1
 Wang, W., & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing
process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL
writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(3), 225–246.1
 Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency
differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language
learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL
learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142.1
  Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009).
Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written
argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183–
209. [Link]
 Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL
students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165–187.1
 Zhao, H. (2017). [No bibliographic record found.]
 Zhou, L. (2023). [No bibliographic record found.]
Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response
groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 25