WSDOT Hydraulic Design Policy Guide
WSDOT Hydraulic Design Policy Guide
1-1 Introduction
This Hydraulics Manual provides policy for designing hydraulic features related to
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) roadways including hydrology,
culverts, open-channel flow, drainage collection and conveyance systems, water crossings,
and pipe materials. These hydraulic features maintain safe driving conditions and protect the
roadway from surface and subsurface water. The chapters contained in the Hydraulics
Manual are also based on the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA’s) Hydraulic
Engineering Circulars (HECs) and the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Drainage Manual.
The Hydraulics Manual makes frequent references to WSDOT’s Highway Runoff Manual,
which provides WSDOT’s requirements for managing stormwater discharges to protect
water quality, beneficial uses of the state’s waters, and the aquatic environment in general.
The intent is to use the two manuals in tandem for complete analysis and design of
stormwater facilities for roadway and other transportation infrastructure projects. Projects
should consult WSDOT’s Design Manual for general hydraulic design guidance. Design-build
projects should also consult the Design Manual and the Design-Build Manual.
In addition to the guidance in the Hydraulics Manual, the hydraulic designer shall use good
engineering judgment and be mindful of WSDOT’s legal and ethical obligations concerning
hydraulic issues. Drainage facilities must be designed to convey water across, along, or away
from the highway in the most economical, efficient, and safe manner possible without
damaging the highway or adjacent properties and without causing permit violations.
Furthermore, care must be taken so that highway construction does not interfere with or
damage any of these facilities.
This chapter explains WSDOT policy regarding hydraulic design and hydraulic reports. In
Section 1-2, the roles and responsibilities of the Project Engineer’s Office (PEO), Region
Hydraulics Engineer (RHE), and State Hydraulics Office are defined. WSDOT has specific
documentation requirements for a hydraulic report, which are specified in Section 1-3. Each
hydraulic feature is designed based on specific design frequencies and, in some cases, a
specific design tool or software. A summary of the design frequency and design tools or
software for most hydraulic features contained in the Hydraulics Manual is provided in
Section 1-4. Section 1-5 describes the Complete Streets program and how it may affect
some aspects of hydraulic design. Section 1-6 defines the process for reviewing and issuing
concurrence of a hydraulic report.
1-2 Responsibility
The PEO is responsible for the preparation of correct and adequate drainage design. All
drainage structure types, culverts, storm sewer, drainage, general pipe connections, and pipe
locations must be verified and annotated by the PEO. Actual design work may be performed
by the PEO, by another WSDOT office, or by a private consulting firm with engineering staff
who are licensed in Washington State; however, in all cases, it is the PEO’s responsibility to
complete the design work and verify that a hydraulic report is prepared as described in
Section 1-3. In addition, the hydraulic report shall follow the review process outlined in
Section 1-6. The PEO is also responsible for initiating the application for hydraulic-related
permits required by various local, state, and federal agencies.
While the PEO is responsible for preparation of hydraulic reports and plans, specifications,
and estimates (PS&E) for all drainage facilities, assistance from the RHE and the State
Hydraulics Office may be requested for any drainage facility design. The RHE and State
Hydraulics Office offer technical assistance to PEOs and local programs for the items listed
below:
1. Hydraulic design of drainage facilities (culverts, storm sewers, stormwater best
management practices [BMPs], siphons, channel changes, etc.).
2. Hydraulic design of structures (culverts, headwalls, etc.).
3. Analysis of closed drainage basins and unusual or unique drainage conditions.
4. Upstream and downstream analysis to identify and evaluate potential impacts from
the project on the hydraulic conveyance system near the project site. The analysis
shall be divided into three sections:
a) Review of resources
b) Inspection of drainage conveyance systems in the site area
c) Analysis of upstream effects
d) Analysis of downstream effects
The roles and responsibilities of the RHE and State Hydraulics Office are outlined in
Table 1-1. The State Hydraulics Office also takes primary responsibility for the following:
1. Design of habitat features and stream restoration elements.
2. Hydraulic analysis (one-dimensional [1D] and two-dimensional [2D]) and support for
scour of water crossings.
3. Analysis of streambank erosion along roadways, river and stream lateral migration,
the design of countermeasures for scour and stream instability, and environmental
mitigation.
4. Floodplain studies, flood predictions, and special hydrological analysis (snowmelt
estimates, storm frequency predictions, etc.).
5. Wind and wave analysis.
6. Technical support to local programs for hydraulic or bridge-related needs.
7. Providing the Washington State Attorney General’s Office with technical assistance
on hydraulic issues.
8. Updating information in the Hydraulics Manual periodically.
There are three types of hydraulic reports: specialty report, Type A, and Type B. Table 1-1
provides guidance for selecting the report type; however, consult the RHE for final
selection.
State
Report Hydraulics
Type Descriptionb RHE Office PE Stamp
Stormwater All projects shall complete a stormwater and hydraulics
and assessment to determine what type of stormwater and
hydraulic hydraulic design, documentation, and level of effort are
assessmenta needed for the project. Some questions for the PEO to answer
as part of the stormwater and hydraulic assessment include:
• Does the project have existing stormwater and hydraulic
deficiencies within the project limits? If so, assess and
discuss the risk of the project not addressing these
deficiencies.
• Does the project’s impacts or modifications make existing
stormwater and hydraulic conditions worse?
• Does the project’s impacts or modifications create new
stormwater and hydraulic issues that need to be
addressed?
• Are there any stormwater retrofit opportunities within the
project limits?
Projects with any of the following components:
• Culverts or buried structures greater than 48 inches in
diameter or span
• Bridge drainage
• Fish passagee
Specialty • Bank protection
g
reportd,l • Woody material (WM) e
• River structures (e.g., barbs, engineered log jams [ELJs],
levees) e
• Channel realignment/modifications or restoratione
• Any fills in floodplain or floodway
• Pump stations
• Hydraulic connectivity zones
• Siphons
• Bridges
• Scour analysis (e.g., bridges, walls, roadway embankments,
other WSDOT infrastructure) f
Concurrencec
State
Report Hydraulics
Type Descriptionb RHE Office PE Stamp
Projects with any of the following components:
• Water quality treatment facility
• Flow control facility
• Storm sewer systems that discharge into a
Ad,l stormwater treatment or flow control facility i,j
• Create, modify, or remove any existing or new BMP (full
or partial treatment BMP)
• Fish passage stormwater treatment assessment for full
or partial treatmenth
• Region facilities projectsi
Projects without Type A components and with any of
the following components:
• Stormwater and non-fish passage culverts up to 48 inches
Bc,d,k in diameterd
• Storm sewer systems that do not discharge into a
stormwater treatment or flow control facility
• Paving/safety restoration and preservation projects
Notes:
HQ = Washington State Department of Transportation Headquarters.
PE = Professional Engineer.
RHE = Region Hydraulics Engineer.
a. A stormwater and hydraulic assessment typically occurs just after project kickoff during design (project
development). In some cases, a stormwater and hydraulic assessment may be as early as the predesign phase of a
project.
b. Projects listed are examples. Projects not listed may still require a specialty report based on direction from the
RHE.
c. In no case may the PEO provide concurrence on its own design.
d. State Hydraulic Office and the RHE shall be involved in developing the scope, budget, schedule, and/or the Request
for Proposal for projects.
e. Fish passage projects shall be designed by a Stream Team, approved by the State Hydraulics Office, and consisting
of a stream design engineer, geomorphologist, and biologist, who shall all co-author the specialty report and have
received their FPSRD certifications.
f. Scour certification is required for stream design engineers, Geomorphologists, or any other team members
conducting and reviewing scour calculations and analysis.
g. The PE stamp shall be either by the State Hydraulics Office or by a licensed engineer in Washington State and
approved by the State Hydraulics Office.
h. All fish passage projects shall complete a stormwater assessment for the feasibility of full or partial stormwater
treatment BMPs. See Highway Runoff Manual for more information.
i. Facilities designed by the RHE will have concurrence from the State Hydraulics Office.
j. The State Hydraulics Office may delegate final review authority and concurrence for all Type A hydraulic reports to a
person designated by the assistant regional administrator for development in each region.
k. A Hydraulic Design Concurrence memo is required by the RHE to the PEO to document that all comments have
been addressed.
l. A Hydraulic Design Concurrence memo is required by the State Hydraulic Office to document that all comments
have been addressed.
The overall hydraulic design process is part of scoping, predesign, design, and construction.
To allow the most efficient hydraulic report review and assessment, PEOs shall follow the
hydraulic review process outlined in Section 1-6.
The PEO shall coordinate with the State Hydraulics Office for the PHD and FHD report.
The hydraulic report submittal process will vary based on the hydraulic report type. For
a Type B hydraulic report for a design-bid-build project, because the drainage-,
conveyance-, and stormwater-related work on the project is very limited, the PEO can
work with the RHE or State Hydraulics Office to determine a submittal timeline for the
Type B hydraulic report. For a Type A hydraulic report for a design-bid-build project, the
submittal process is a little more defined. Below is a description of each Type A
hydraulic report submittal and the approximate timing of each submittal:
a) Preliminary Type A report: This submittal shall occur during the project development
phase after the stormwater and hydraulic assessment.
a. Recommend this submittal after Highway Runoff Manual minimum
requirements and Endangered Species Act (ESA) programmatic consultation
stormwater requirements (if applicable) have been determined, draft
threshold discharge area (TDA) delineations are complete, discharge locations
have been identified, existing drainage issues within the project limits have
been identified, existing stormwater drainage system has been mapped
within the project limits, stormwater retrofitting requirements have been
construction office can work with the RHE or State Hydraulics Office
to determine if any changes need to be made to the stormwater and
hydraulic design and intermediate Type A hydraulic report because of
the drainage-related change order(s). Any drainage-related changes
need to be worked into the overall stormwater and hydraulic design
and the final Type A hydraulic report. In some cases where drainage-
related change orders require significant changes, many things may
need to be updated including TDA delineations, Highway Runoff
Manual minimum requirements, the stormwater design
documentation spreadsheet, the conveyance design, and any
stormwater and hydraulic deviations previously approved. The
engineer of record overseeing these new changes would need to
stamp the final Type A hydraulic report to cover any changes as a
result of the drainage related change orders.
b. The construction PEO submits the drainage-related change orders for review
and comments to the RHE or State Hydraulics Office per Table 1-1.
c. If the drainage-related change orders, after consulting with the engineer of
record and the RHE or State Hydraulics Office, do not require a change or
there are no drainage-related change orders to the intermediate Type A
hydraulic report, then the intermediate Type A hydraulic report can be
renamed as the final Type A hydraulic report.
d) Final Type A Hydraulic report: This submittal shall occur after construction of the
project has reached substantial completion.
a. Recommend this submittal after all drainage-related change order submittals
(if any) have been approved and constructed, drainage-related change order
submittal changes have been incorporated into the final Type A hydraulic
report and all relevant sections of the final Type A hydraulic report have been
updated, and as-built verification of stormwater and hydraulic features has
occurred.
b. The construction PEO submits the final Type A hydraulic report for review,
comments, and concurrence to the RHE or State Hydraulics Office per Table
1-1.
c. This generally occurs during the construction phase of the project but after
substantial completion.
d. BMP maintenance plans shall be finalized along with the final Type A
hydraulic report.
PEOs shall ensure that any electronic submittal is complete and is searchable. The PEO
can use the hydraulic report checklist to help identify and schedule critical submittal
dates.
All submittals shall be in electronic format. All pages of all submittals shall be in
searchable Portable Document Format (PDF). In addition to the searchable PDF
document, submittals that include hidden information not visible in PDF format (such as
calculations in the cells of a spreadsheet or drawing) shall be submitted in their original
format (e.g., Word, Excel, InRoads) to facilitate WSDOT’s full review and understanding
of the basis and assumptions for calculations and other output
A conceptual Type A or Type B hydraulic report shall have the following items:
a) Conceptual hydraulic report: This submittal shall occur during the project
development phase after the stormwater and hydraulic assessment but before
finalizing the RFP.
a. Recommend this submittal after Highway Runoff Manual minimum
requirements and ESA programmatic consultation requirements (if applicable)
have been determined, draft TDA delineations are complete, existing
drainage issues have been identified, the existing stormwater drainage
system has been identified, discharge locations have been identified,
a. This submittal shall incorporate all of the hydraulic design packages into one
coherent and complete stormwater and hydraulics design and Type A or B
hydraulic report that shows how the project has addressed and is compliant
with the mandatory standards and the RFP.
b. The design-builder submits the Type A or B intermediate hydraulic report for
review and comments to the WSDOT engineer (who sends it to the RHE or
State Hydraulics Office per Table 1-1).
e) Design-builder’s Type A or Type B final hydraulic report: This submittal shall occur
after construction is complete on the project and after the as-built verification of
stormwater and hydraulic features walk-through.
a. This submittal shall incorporate any changes that occurred after the
intermediate hydraulic report and generate one coherent and complete
stormwater and hydraulics design and Type A or B hydraulic report that
shows how the project has addressed and is compliant with the mandatory
standards and the RFP.
b. The design-builder submits the Type A or B final hydraulic report for review
and comments to the WSDOT engineer (who sends it to the RHE or State
Hydraulics Office per Table 1-1). The SHO or RHE shall issue a hydraulic
report concurrence memo once all comments for the final hydraulic report
have been resolved.
c. BMP maintenance plans shall be finalized along with the Type A final
hydraulic report.
f) Specialty Reports: The specialty report(s) shall describe the approach taken and the
order of the calculations, including sections on the methodologies used
(appropriateness and accuracy requirements), design decisions made, and resultant
summaries. The calculations shall include electronic copies of the input and output
from the supporting computer programs, spreadsheets, hand calculations, exhibits,
and sketches. At a minimum, the calculations shall also include the following design
calculation items:
a) Word and PDF file;
b) Excel files for figures in text;
c) Long profile and long-term degradation;
d) Pebble counts and sediment mobility calculations;
e) Reference reach cross-section comparison figure;
f) Others;
g) Geographic information system (GIS) data;
h) Field visit data including bankfull width (BFW), pebble count, and reference reach
locations;
i) Basin boundary;
j) Appendix files;
k) Large woody material (LWM) calculator;
l) Sediment size and mobility;
m) Manning’s n roughness;
n) Excel files for model results at cross sections and profiles;
o) Scour calculations FHWA Toolbox Report and HYD files;
p) Scour countermeasure calculations FHWA Toolbox Report and HYD files;
q) Field visit photos;
r) Hydrology;
s) MGSFlood model if used;
t) Other hydrology models;
u) Hydraulic model;
v) SRH-2D model;
w) All input and output files;
x) Remove extraneous or working files/simulations: coverages and simulations shall
be clearly named;
y) Coverages used for results reporting including observation lines and 1D
centerline and cross section;
z) Special design features: design-builder shall include a brief narrative of design
decisions or revisions, electronic files from design calculations, and justification;
aa) Design decision summaries;
bb) Technical specifications necessary for construction;
cc) Drainage maps showing the water crossing structures and all other illustrations
necessary to support and clarify the design calculations. Electronic design
drawings and maps, when printed, shall be on 11-by-17-inch pages;
dd) Channel section design;
ee) Streambed material sizing;
ff) Scour analysis;
gg) Scour analysis for streambed gravel sizing around LWM structures, if applicable;
hh) LWM buoyancy and anchoring calculations, if applicable; and
ii) Other applicable data or analysis.
PEOs and the design-builder shall ensure that any electronic submittal is complete and is
searchable. The PEO can use the hydraulic report checklist to help identify and schedule
critical submittal dates.
Developers, state and local agencies, utilities, and others designing stormwater facilities
within the WSDOT ROW shall assume the same responsibility as the PEO and prepare
hydraulic reports in compliance with the policy outlined in Chapter 1. Developers, state
and local agencies, utilities, and others discharging stormwater to the WSDOT ROW
may need a permit. For more information on requirements and permits for discharging
to the WSDOT ROW and/or building on the WSDOT ROW, consult the Design Manual,
Utilities Manual, and Local Agency Guidelines manual.
see the hydraulic report outline for more information. For projects that require a flood
risk assessment see additional guidance in Chapter 7.
• Projects that add 5,000 square feet or more of new, impervious surface area
• Projects where known drainage or erosion problems indicate there may be impacts
on either the upstream or downstream conveyance system, properties, or sensitive
areas
• Projects that add less than 5,000 square feet of new, impervious surface and where
the project is within 300 feet of a stream or if the project’s stormwater discharges
into a stream within 0.25 mile upstream or downstream of WSDOT’s ROW
• Projects that alter existing hydrology or drainage
drainage conveyance system at the project site and downstream from the WSDOT
ROW for a distance of at least 0.25 mile and upstream to a point where any backwater
conditions cease. The inspection shall include any problems or areas of concern that
were noted during the resource review process or in conversations with local residents
and the WSDOT Maintenance Office. The PEO shall also identify existing or potential
conveyance capacity problems in the drainage system, existing or potential areas where
flooding may occur, existing or potential areas of extensive channel destruction or
erosion, and existing or potential areas of significant destruction of aquatic habitat
(runoff treatment or flow control) that can be related to stormwater runoff. If areas of
potential and existing impacts related to project site runoff are established, actions must
be taken to minimize impacts to upstream and downstream resources.
1-3.5.4 Analysis of Upstream and Downstream Effects
This final step analyzes information gathered in the first two steps of the analysis. It is
necessary to determine if the project will create any drainage conveyance problems
downstream or make any existing problems worse. The PEO must analyze upstream and
downstream effects to determine corrective or preventive actions that may be necessary. If
the project is within a medium- or high-vulnerability location according to the Climate
Impacts Vulnerability Assessment statewide map, the PEO must run extreme events (e.g., the
100-year storm event) and evaluate the impacts and stability of the conveyance system. The
PEO will perform a risk assessment based on the extreme events showing impacts to the
conveyance system and to downstream properties and sensitive areas.
PEOs will consult the Highway Runoff Manual for further guidance on the design flow for
runoff treatment and flow control BMP design. In some cases, analysis of effects may
indicate that no corrective or preventive actions are necessary. If corrective or
preventive actions are necessary, the following options must be considered:
• Design the on-site treatment and/or flow control facilities to provide a greater level
of runoff control than stipulated in the minimum requirements in Chapter 3 of the
Highway Runoff Manual.
• Take a protective action separate from meeting Minimum Requirements 5 and 6 in
the Highway Runoff Manual for runoff treatment and flow control. In some situations,
a project will have negative impacts even when the minimum requirements are met.
Below are two examples:
• Roadway runoff in a project’s TDA was sheet-flowing to the roadway side
slopes in the pre-developed condition but is now being collected and
conveyed to a stormwater detention pond in the post-developed condition.
The detention pond’s emergency overflow usually discharges to the same
location as the riser structure and overflow structure but sometimes
discharges to a different location. In both scenarios, even though the
detention pond will provide flow control for more frequent storm events (up
to the 25-year for eastern Washington or 50-year for western Washington),
the larger, less frequent storm events (100-year) may not have flow control.
These scenarios need to be analyzed as part of the downstream analysis.
Because the stormwater is now collected and conveyed to one or two
discharge locations, there may be more flow at those discharge locations
During the stormwater and hydraulic assessment, the existing stormwater drainage
conveyance system (culverts, storm sewers, catch basins, manholes, inlets, grates, and
ditches) shall be discussed to identify any needed repairs or replacements. If possible, it
is strongly recommended that the PEO physically inspect the entire existing stormwater
drainage conveyance system within the project limits, especially if adding new
stormwater flows to it. There may be condition ratings for some of these existing
stormwater features in Highway Activities Tracking System (HATS) or the Stormwater
Features Inventory that may aid in determining the physical inspection requirements.
Contact the State Hydraulics Office for culvert Level 1 and Level 2 inspection
requirements and guidelines. See the 2020 AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain System
Inspection Guide for guidance on inspecting storm sewer, catch basins, manholes, inlets,
grates, and ditches.
6b StormShed3G
Storm sewers
(MRI based on farthest
downstream BMP or 25)
StormShed3G or FHWA
Ditches 4
Hydraulic Toolbox
Non-fish passage culvertsa 3 HY-8, HEC-RAS, SRH-2DC
StormShed3G, HY-8, HEC-
Temporary diversionsa 3 C
RAS, SRH-2D
Water crossings 7 SRH-2DC
Stormwater BMP See the Highway Runoff Manual
Notes:
a. Coordinate with the RHE to determine the appropriate software to use and potential reports required.
b. When tying into existing systems, the hydrologic methods used shall be the rational method.
c. Use the model checklist found on WSDOT’s Hydraulics & hydrology website under the Tools, templates & links tab.
schedule, project teams can proactively assess how these components interact with and
influence other design elements, identify potential conflicts, and make necessary
adjustments to avoid delays or cost overruns. This integrated approach helps to ensure
that the project is completed on time, meets regulatory requirements, and achieves its
performance goals without unforeseen challenges arising from hydraulic issues.
There are three primary types of hydraulic reports (see Section 1-3):
• Type A
• Type B
• Specialty
Schedule templates for these different types of hydraulic reports can be found online under
Tools, Templates and Links on the WSDOT Hydraulics & hydrology website. Refer to Design
Manual Section 800.03 and Exhibits 800-1 through 800-5 for an overview of the hydraulic
design process. For additional guidance on schedule development please contact your RHE
or the State Hydraulics Office.