Social Protection Research Compendium
Social Protection Research Compendium
asFGJL'
ii
Copyright © General Economics Division (GED), Bangladesh Planning Commission, January 2020.
All rights are reserved. Though we encourage use of these research papers by any interested person, but no part
of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by means of
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior permission.
Disclaimer: This document was prepared by the eminent researchers/scholars. However, Cabinet Division, and
General Economics Division (GED) of Bangladesh Planning Commission in no way bear any responsibility for any
statement, figure/data that contained in the research papers where onus lies to author(s) only. The document
has been produced with technical assistance from Social Security Policy Support (SSPS) Programme, a joint
Project of Cabinet Division and General Economics Division (GED) of Bangladesh Planning Commission,
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh under TA support of UNDP, Bangladesh with DFAT fund.
The contents or any statement, figure/data that contained in the publication can in no way be taken to reflect
the views of DFAT and UNDP.
Technical Working Group: The overall technical supports, including compilation, editing, framework designing,
and directing researches were provided by the following technical working team:
Dr. Shamsul Alam, Member (Senior Secretary), General Economics Division (GED), Editor
Md. Faizul Islam, Joint Chief, and National Project Director, SSPS Programme, Associate Editor
Aminul Arifeen, National Project Manager, SSPS Programme, Associate Editor
Published by:
Social Security Policy Support (SSPS) Programme
Cabinet Division, and General Economics Division (GED) of Bangladesh Planning Commission
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh
[Link]
LIST OF STUDIES
1. Barriers of Accessing Social Protection Programmes for the Poor and Marginalised
2. Cost-Benefit Ratio Study on Effects of Social Protection Cash Transfer
3. Implication of Changing Demographics and Effects on Social Protection in Bangladesh
4. Long-Term Effect of Livelihood Promotion Types of Social Security Programmes
5. Workfare Programmes and Skill Development in Bangladesh: Evidence and Policy Implications
6. Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options
7. Diagnostics for Urban Poverty and the Social Security Needs of the Urban Poor in Bangladesh
8. Situation Analysis: A Perception Study on Persons with Disabilities in Bangladesh
Introduction
The National Social Security Strategy, adopted in 2015, stipulated seven key programmatic reforms.
Consolidation of ‘small’ social security programmes, which, at that time, numbered around a hundred, was
one of them. 2 The NSSS viewed small programme consolidation as an effective means for reducing
administrative costs and increasing coordination in programme implementation. As such, the strategy
prescribed for harmonization of small SSPs in conformity with lifecycle risk-based major programmes. The
NSSS stipulated 2016-21 as the phase-I for implementing all reforms including small programme
consolidation.
The progress made on programme consolidation has, however, not been much.3 One of the major underlying
reasons for this, is the lack of clarity in defining ‘small programmes’. Neither the NSSS nor the NSSS
Implementation Action Plan provided any clear indication of what should be considered as small. Lack of
coordination among line-ministries is another reason for slow progress. The NSSS suggests the ministries to
prepare a ‘business case’ for their small programmes, justifying their continuation. However, this has not
been achieved. Moreover, as specified in the NSSS Midterm Implementation Review, the ministries did not
have a clear understanding of the concept of programme consolidation, its processes or objectives. The
widespread lack of clarity and guidance in navigating the concerned ministries through a process for
achieving the goal of programme harmonisation has also contributed to very limited progress.
Currently, there are as many as 84 social security programmes (SSPs) each with an individual share less than
0.5 per cent of the total SSP budget. The combined share of these programmes is less than 10 per cent of
the total budget. As has already been noted in the NSSS, harmonisation of these programmes has had
important implications for improving efficiency and achieving programmes goals of the social security
system. If similar social security programmes are managed and operated by a few numbers of authorities
instead of many, at each stage of service provision, starting from identification of beneficiaries to distribution
of benefits, the administrative, operational, and delivery costs will reduce substantially. In addition,
harmonisation might have a significant impact on the reduction of existing targeting errors in the beneficiary
selection and can help better planning.
Against the backdrop, this report aims at profiling small social security programmes, identifying their salient
features, and proposing a framework for effective and efficient harmonisation. Since the NSSS does not
provide any working definition for the small SSPs, this report proposes a working definition based on
consultations with social security experts and relevant other stakeholders. Following the agreed definition,
this report maps out all the SSPs by broad categories, as such the programmes on life-cycle risks, covariate
risks, or region-specific special small programmes, etc. The lifecycle risks programmes are further narrowed
down to different sub-categories (such as – programmes for children, working-age, persons with disabilities,
etc.). A close analytical observation of the small SSPs based on budget, number of beneficiaries, objectives,
eligibility, etc. have also been incorporated. The report incorporates a review of the international
experiences of social security programme harmonisation and proposes a harmonisation strategy under the
ideal scenario. Nonetheless, noting the challenges that such an ideal programme harmonisation may face,
this report devises a pragmatic framework in the context of Bangladesh for small SSP harmonisation. Finally,
several broad and programme specific recommendations are provided for the effective and efficient
harmonisation of small programmes.
2 A COMPENDIUM
The other key reforms stipulated in the NSSS are: 1) strengthening social security for the children (1-18); OF SOCIALPROTECTION RESEARCHES
2) Strenthening
programmes for working age, and vulnerable women; 3) Comprehensive pension systems for the elderly; 4) Strengthening the
system of social security for people with disabilities; 5) Strengthening the social security system for the urban poor; 6) Consolidation
and reform of food security type programmes;
3 This information is based on a draft report prepared by the UNDP for the GED “NSSS Midterm Implementation Review”, and
The report is organized as follows: after this introduction, section II presents a review of literature on
harmonisation. Cross country experiences in harmonizing social security programmes are also discussed in
that section. Section III provides a methodological pathway to address the research questions mentioned
above, which is followed by an in-depth analysis of the current scenario of small social security in Bangladesh.
Based on observed programme objectives and other information obtained from KIIs and desk research, this
section proposes a feasible framework in the context of Bangladesh of small programme harmonisation.
Finally, section IV discusses some way forward how to advance the NSSS envisaged objective of small SSPs’
harmonisation incorporating some programme specific and across-the-board recommendations.
The planning phase includes initial assessment, the involvement of the stakeholders, and harmonisation plan
of the programmes. In the implementation of phase consolidation activities, a well-defined time horizon is
required to achieve harmonisation objectives, and monitoring plans are undertaken. Information on
efficiency and effectiveness indicators of harmonisation are collected, and the plan is then reviewed during
the monitoring phase with stakeholders. Finally, with the updates of the monitoring phase, the initial plan
of harmonisation is reviewed and updated.
As noted in the literature, harmonisation and consolidation usually occur with a view to saving resources
and improving efficiency. Sometimes in the private or public sectors, departments that are similar and have
a common purpose merge together, to reduce the administrative costs and achieve economies of scale.
Another objective of consolidation is to better achieve the objectives of separate departments by
streamlining management responsibilities. Nevertheless, attaining these objectives would require a clear
focus on the goal and follow a systematic framework.
Planning Implement
ation
Updating Monitoring
4 A COMPENDIUM
Sustainable Integrated Multi-sector Planning (SIMPLA) supports local authorities in harmonizing OF SOCIALPROTECTION
their Sustainable Energy Action RESEARCHES
Plans (SEAPs) in Europe.
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 342
Several studies explore the harmonisation and consolidation practices for different types of programmes
across many countries. Neve et al. (2017) discusses the harmonisation of community-based health worker
programmes for HIV across several countries. Based on their work, harmonisation for our case of small
programmes can be defined as initiatives of improving collaboration among involved stakeholders to
contribute together to a comprehensive, sustainable, and efficient social security system. This initiative
requires advocacy, programming, funding, implementation, monitoring, and building a knowledge base for
existing small programmes.
According to Neve et al. (2017), harmonisation can be conducted along with a number of dimensions, all of
which can be grouped into three broad objectives. First, is the coordination among the stakeholders, i.e.
development partners, ministries, and local authorities. This objective is one of the preconditions of a
successful harmonisation initiative. Coordination among the stakeholders should focus on reducing
duplication, fragmentation, and an overlap of objectives. The second crucial dimension of a successful
harmonisation approach is integration. Integration is defined as the assimilation of social interventions into
prime targets of the social security system. Integration plays an important role in clarifying the
responsibilities of ministries in charge. Integration also standardises small SSPs and improves efficiency by
addressing objectives while reducing both administrative costs and targeting errors. The third dimension to
consider while pursuing harmonisation is the sustainability of programmes. Sustainability ensures the
continuation of programmes aligned with the long-term goals of NSSS.
Jaccound et al. (2010) discussed the development of social assistance policy in Brazil and considered the
efforts involved in consolidating social assistance services. Brazil's initiative required substantial
management reforms to strengthen the distribution of benefits. It also introduced the National Social
Assistance Plan (2004) which laid the groundwork for the consolidation of social assistance services based
on territories and by complexity. This plan made it mandatory to establish public infrastructures at
municipality level to organise social services by regions. This intervention significantly improved the delivery
of social assistance benefits. Besides, that, for achieving the programme objectives, the National Social
Assistance Plan (2004) arranged a unified system based on two goals. The basic social protection services
were formed to prevent people from entering poverty and vulnerability. The second group of services are
for more specific scenarios or needs. Jaccound et al. (2010) also analyses major challenges in social assistance
policies in Brazil after the enactment of the constitution that consolidated benefits. Another paper, Fox and
Gurley (2006) explores and attempts to identify several issues involved in deciding whether consolidation of
local governments yields economic benefits. Their findings suggest that net benefits from consolidation
depends on both benefits or efficiency gained and administrative as well as management costs incurred in
consolidating the programmes.
Cecchini and Martinez (2013) talk about the harmonisation of co-responsibility transfer programmes (CTP)
to address heterogeneous demands for social protection. The target population of social protection generally
is far from homogeneous in terms of their needs, deprivations, and other situations exacerbating their living
standards. They stem from a vast assortment of cultural, age, spatial, economic, gender, and other factors.
In Chile and Columbia, the co-responsibility transfer programmes aimed at overcoming extreme poverty are
incorporated into the family support programme. Complementary strategies have also been established in
many Latin-American countries (El Salvador’s Solidarity in Rural Communities programme, Mexico’s
Oportunidades programme, to address particular characteristics, Colombia’s Families in Action programme,
etc.). One concern in the case of harmonising social security schemes is the lack of coordination in the supply
of social protection policies and programmes. Two types of integration improve the supply-side coordination
of SSPs, one being the horizontal integration, and another is vertical integration. Horizontal integration
implies the cross-sector integration and collaboration at and between the different administrative levels.
Horizontal integration includes harmonisation of activities between central and local level, among the
different sectors and actors operating at the local level and improves contact with beneficiaries. On the other
hand, vertical integration indicates the strengthening of coordination between management levels. In this
type of integration, the budgetary procedures, rules for resources transfer, shared responsibilities, functions,
and powers should be clearly specified among different management levels of the government.
Nelson (2011) discusses different measures that are practised in European countries to increase the
efficiency of social protection. It also explores the potential trade-off between efficiency and effectiveness
in the re-organization of social protection. The European Union Social Protection Committee in their ‘Europe
2020 Strategy’ has advocated improving the efficiency of social protection for member states by reducing
the complexity of programme regulations at the scale of administrative costs. One crucial policy response
mentioned in this paper is to improve the effectiveness of benefits by targeting the beneficiaries more
restrictively at the very bottom of the income distribution. Miroelli (2017) discusses the consolidation of
conditional cash transfer programmes (CCTP) that have been used as a core policy programme to address
poverty in Latin America. Consolidation and redefined targets of CCTPs in Chile and Ecuador led to an
increase in the number of beneficiaries and the budget size.
Inclusiveness
Efficiency
Coherence Harmonisation
Lifecycle
risks
Inclusiveness ensures the right to social security benefits of the eligible population that is particularly
vulnerable and marginalized groups during their difficult times. To ensure maximum efficiency and
effectiveness, a harmonised social protection system must be provided on a non-discriminatory basis, even
though both the channels and modes of financing such programmes and transferring the benefits may differ.
Any social security programme will ensure the availability, accessibility, and adequacy of schemes distributed
to the target group population.
Another important criterion for a systematic harmonisation process is “Efficiency”. In the context of the
social protection scheme, efficiency can be considered at two different levels, the system level and the
programme level. Efficiency at the system level measures the conversion of inputs into system outputs, such
as transfers, and services delivered to beneficiaries. On the other hand, at the programme level, operational
efficiency of delivering social protection programmes can be understood as delivering social protection
‘outputs’ (resource transfers and services) at the lowest possible cost without adversely affecting the quality
of individual programmes (White, Hodges, & Greenslade, 2013). A coordinated approach should be
undertaken to serve a social protection system instead of developing numerous programmes in an isolated
manner and on an ad-hoc basis. In a well-coordinated social security system, redundancy, delicacy, coverage
gaps, and administrative costs can be mitigated. Cost efficiency at the beneficiary level can also be better
achieved through a well-coordinated system. The degree of institutional efficiency also plays a vital role in
building a well-coordinated social protection system.
Another key determinant of the harmonised social protection system is the performance and coherence of
its delivery mechanism. In many cases, it is seen that the delivery mechanism of social security involves
multiple ministries, non-governmental organizations, and other administrative agencies. An effective
mechanism of coordination among the implementing agencies should be in place for successful
implementation of these programmes. One of the main problems with the existing portfolio of small social
security programmes is that there are multiple programmes with similar objectives and target population
(fragmentation) leading to higher delivery and administrative costs. For the purpose of assessing a small SSP,
on the basis of the coherence criterion, we first need to identify its target population, objectives, and the
type of risk for which it is designed. In the next stage, it should be identified as to whether the programme
violates the consistency criterion or not. In the final stage, a small programme can be restructured or merged
with a similar programme to meet this criterion.
Lastly, as is evident from the literature, the harmonisation of social security programmes should be aligned
with the core lifecycle risk programmes. The lifecycle approach is particularly important as it puts special
focus on socially excluded groups facing social discrimination. Indeed, the present NSSS adopts a lifecycle
risk approach of social security system classifying the programmes into four categories: programmes for
children (0-18), programmes for working-age people (18-59), programmes for elderly (60+), and people with
disabilities. By disaggregating the social security budget allocation into lifecycle risks, the action plan shows
that the highest 45 per cent of the total allocation went to old age people, while the pregnancy and childhood
component shared only 3 per cent of the total allocation. This result suggests that there are significant gaps
in present allocation that needs to be adjusted considerably for implementing a lifecycle-risk centric social
security system.
It is noteworthy that strengthening the delivery system is one of the main objectives of NSSS. The delivery
system of social security involves multiple ministries, non-governmental organizations, and other
administrative agencies. An effective mechanism of coordination among implementing agencies should be
in place for successful implementation of social security programmes. One of the main problems with the
existing portfolio of small social security programmes is that there are multiple programmes with similar
objectives and target population (fragmentation) leading to higher delivery and administrative costs. For the
purpose of assessing a small SSP, on the basis of the coherence criterion, we first need to identify its target
population, objectives, and the type of risk for which it is designed. In the next stage, it should be identified
whether the programme violates the consistency criterion or not. In the final stage, a small programme can
be restructured or merged with a similar programme to meet the coherence criterion.
It must be noted that having a criterion for programme harmonisation is not sufficient to carry out the
exercise. This is primarily because, a tool is required to accompany the framework so that progress can be
monitored from time to time, and assessment can be carried out when and where it is required. There are a
couple of tools for assessing social security programmes.
One such assessment tool is the Core Diagnostic Instrument (CODI) developed by Inter-Agency Social
Protection Assessments (ISPA). The ISPA has developed a number of tools at the system level, programme
level, and delivery level. The objectives of such tools include solving the problem of inclusivity, effectiveness,
and efficiency of national social protection systems. At the national level, the CODI framework helps a
country assess its overall social protection system through a consistent set of outcome matrices in a coherent
manner (ISPA, 2012). CODI provides a comprehensive implementation guideline including data collection
framework and templates for preparing social security system assessment. In an ideal framework for
harmonisation, programme level assessment criteria in line with the system-level assessment framework of
CODI needs to be developed.
Another key tool for the analysis of efficiency and effectiveness of social protection system is the Value for
Money (VfM) exercise developed by the DFID. This method takes into consideration of both costs and
benefits of social transfer programmes in different stages of the programme: ex-ante design and appraisal
stage, implementation stage, and in ex-post evaluation. The VfM focuses on maximization of the impact of
social transfers for poverty alleviation programmes as well as minimization of the cost of the programmes.
VfM is comprised of three components: economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. The Economy component
focuses on the economy in the procurement of necessary inputs for the programmes. The Efficiency
component measures the performance of the programme in terms of the conversion of inputs into output
(value of transfers received by beneficiaries). The main component of VfM analysis is Effectiveness. This
analyses the relationship between the cost of social transfer and the value of the transfers delivered to
beneficiaries. Effectiveness highlights how the outputs are converted to outcomes and impacts of the
programme.
The discussion to this point entails some key elements essential for an ideal framework for small programme
harmonisation. As has been mentioned, for programme harmonisation it should include four key features –
namely inclusiveness, efficiency, coherence, and alignment with lifecycle risks. However, as noted, some
tools are essential for gauging the progress on particular indicators. Both CODI and VfM framework can be
considered an effective tool. But before adopting such tools as a component of the framework – a further
close inspection is required identifying to what extent the information is available essential for these
analyses.
A close inspection of the tools reveals that the proper application of CODI or VfM analysis would not be
possible in the case of Bangladesh as far as small programme consolidation is concerned. This is because
most of the information required for conducting the ex-ante analysis of the small programme harmonisation
is not readily available. For instance, for the ‘Economy’ analysis of the VfM tool, one would need to have
procurement documents for each and every small programme in consideration. After assessing the cost
breakdown, it will be needed to compare with the cost of procurement of a newly proposed combined
programme. Since such cost breakdown are not available for all the small programmes, an ex-ante ‘Economy’
analysis is not feasible. With regard to the CODI analysis, many of the indicators (such as inclusivity) follows
a subjective analysis. Suppose we would like to harmonise three small programmes with a larger existing
programme, for carrying out the inclusivity analysis – we would require a detailed breakdown of
beneficiaries, such as – how many beneficiaries were female, or had a disability, or from a marginalised
group, etc. Such details are not available for carrying out a proper CODI analysis of ‘inclusivity’. Such a lack
of information will not make it possible to analyse whether, or to what extent, the new programme would
be better off than the current programme. As such, the lack of data or programme information would limit
the application of an ideal harmonisation framework. Recognising this limitation, this study proposes an
alternative pragmatic programme harmonisation strategy. The proposed pragmatic harmonisation strategy
is constructed upon the following assumptions:
(i) Inclusivity is better ensured in a single harmonised programme compared to similar multiple
programmes: ensuring inclusivity in social security programmes requires a detailed mapping of
the beneficiaries as well as regular monitoring of the programmes. Since monitoring of a single
programme is much easier than a couple of similar smaller programmes, in this respect,
inclusivity could be better ensured through a single harmonised programme.
(ii) a single harmonised programme is more efficient than a couple of smaller programmes:
holding all other things constant, a higher number of programmes with similar objectives would
mean a more inefficient allocation of resources. This would also mean higher transaction costs.
This is because, there is always some fixed cost in operating any programme, whether large or
small. It includes costs in procurement processes such as advertising for a particular service
delivery. When a couple of programmes advertise separately for the delivery of the same service
– it means nothing but multiplication in the cost of an advertisement. Such other costs can be –
hiring and firing costs, rents, litigation charges, and other administrative costs. With the
amalgamation of all smaller programmes into an existing large programme – such a service
delivery costs can be minimised. Thereby, a single large programme would be more efficient
than a couple of smaller programmes.
(iii) Consolidated programmes are more effective in terms of achieving service goals: as has already
been mentioned, typically any social security programme service delivery has multiple layers of
administrative procedures. If multiple similar programmes are in operation by different
ministries, it would mean nothing but duplicities in delivering similar output through more
complex administrative procedures. Moreover, not all ministries/ government agencies have a
uniform efficiency in rendering services. Such procedural complexities coupled with
administrative inefficiencies can delay the service delivery attenuating the programme efficacy.
In this regard, a unified and simplified harmonised programme delivered by the most efficient
service provider would be more effective in terms of achieving the programme goals.
stage (Figure 6.3).5 Moreover, programmes related to the delivery of essential supplies related to health
(such as contraceptives), nutrition, or delivery of other utilities are not considered for harmonisation.
Small SSPs considered for harmonisation in this study have components of life-cycle risks, covariate risks,
and social empowerment such as training, microcredits, gender-related issues, disability, marginalised
groups, and special groups of population. If the selected small programme is unique in terms of objectives,
no consolidation will be required for the programme. Such a programme should continue or expand if
deemed necessary. However, if the small SSP is being run with similar or overlapping objectives of some
other SSP, the programme should be considered for harmonization. Finally, if the programme selected by
utilizing the above procedure ends before 2021, it is assumed to be inappropriate for this study as such a
scheme will phase itself out.
Following this above-mentioned procedure, 42 small programmes (out of 85) are finally selected for
harmonization.6 In order to consolidate small SSPs, once selected, the study follows a step-by-step strategic
approach illustrated in Figure 6.4. The process starts at the node where the small programme selection
procedure ended in Figure 6.3.
Based on a detailed desk research, a profile of these programmes has been prepared. In many cases, where
up-to-date information was not available, the team cross-validated it from KIIs with relevant government
officials. Gathering this information, all the programme objectives were observed in detail and categorised
into three broad classes: (i) lifecycle programmes; (ii) covariate risks; and (iii) special programmes. Once
categorised, these programme objectives are then cross-tabulated against the NSSS objectives. In the cases
where NSSS stipulated similar large programmes (for instance the National Nutrition Services (NNS)), the
small programme is suggested to be consolidated with such a programme. The research team realized for
some of the small SSPs, no large programme with similar goals is stipulated in the NSSS (as such the case for
microcredits or skill development programmes). In such scenarios, this research provides suggestions on the
structure of a few large programmes consolidating small SSPs with similar objectives.
5 A COMPENDIUM
For small SSPs of Bangladesh, one important constraint of applying the ideal harmonization OF SOCIALPROTECTION
framework mentioned in the literature, RESEARCHES
is the unavailability of adequate information. In order to gather information, the research team had to put enormous amount of effort
interviewing a number of social security officials. Respective websites of the ministries and several divisions provide only a limited
amount of information on the small SSPs. In addition, at times even the concerned ministries were not able to provide sufficient
information regarding many of the small social security programmes in our analysis.
6 However, for a broader analysis of the programmes, several additional programmes have been considered and added in Table 6.2
Related to construction/delivery of
service equipment?
Yes
No
Source: Prepared by RAPID based on consultations with SSPS project office and Social Security Experts
Programme
Outside the sphere
selected for
No of this study
harmonisation
Yes
Categorisation of the programme Analysis of the objectives of the small
programme
No
Yes
The SSPs in Bangladesh are commonly classified into four broad categories: programmes for lifecycle risks,
programmes for covariate shocks, special scheme programmes, and other/miscellaneous programmes.
According to the MoF, 125 programmes have been classified as Social Security Programmes for the 2019-20
fiscal year. Among these, the top six SSP programmes constitute more than half of the total budgetary
allocation. A major share of the budget (more than 30%) is spent on pension schemes of the government
officials. Amongst others, Grameen Infrastructure Development, Honorarium for Freedom Fighters, Old Age
Allowance, Food Friendly Programme, Vulnerable Group Feeding (VGF), Vulnerable Group Development
(VGD), Employment Generation for the Poorest (EGPP), and Test Relief (TR Cash) are the major large
programmes. According to the most recent data including the government service pension schemes,
provided by the SSPS team, the most significant 20 SSPs comprise of more than 70% of the total SSP budget,
while the selected 42 small programmes have an allocation of only 4.13% of the SSP budget. Most of these
small programmes are initiated and financed by development partners.
As it has already been discussed, managing and streamlining the vast array of programmes is a rather
challenging task and requires a well-coordinated execution. To consolidate major and special programmes,
the NSSS provides some specific suggestions. As per the NSSS recommendation, schemes that are similar in
nature should be consolidated as one scheme. It suggests that programmes should be combined into some
broad categories, such as Vulnerable Women’s Benefit (VWB) programme, Child Benefit Programme,
Workfare Programme, Disability Benefits Programme. Special programmes that are targeted at a specific
group of the population should be combined under broad schemes of specialized interventions. For example,
currently, there are four programmes for the freedom fighters and their families, which are very similar and
can be consolidated into one scheme called the Freedom Fighters' Benefits Programme.
The NSSS also asks the concerned ministries to manage and determine the usefulness of their small schemes.
Redesigning and consolidating small programmes and special schemes are also envisaged by the
Government of Bangladesh in the Action Plan. In accordance with the lifecycle framework, the NSSS suggests
that small SSPs should be reshaped or modified as per one of the following procedures:
The first question that arises while discussing the ‘small social security programmes’ is defining the
magnitude of ‘small’. As stated in Section II, based on the discussions with relevant government officials,
social security experts, and academicians, two propelling ideas are afloat. First, all SSPs having less than 0.5
per cent of the total budget (equivalent to or less than Tk. 372 crore) can be considered as small. 7 , 8
Alternatively, programmes at the bottom decile (in terms of budgetary allocation) can be considered as small
programmes. The data reveals that following 0.5 per cent cut-off value, 85 social security programmes can
be identified as small (Figure 6.5). Coincidentally, these 85 programmes also rank in the bottom decile in
terms of budgetary allocation (Figure 6.6).
76
1
6
11
16
21
26
31
36
41
46
51
56
61
66
71
81
86
91
96
101
106
111
116
121
Budget (Crore BDT) Cumulative (%)
# of programmes
0 6.0%
% of total SSP budget
1000 5.0%
4.0%
Budget
2000
3.0%
3000
2.0%
4000 1.0%
5000 0.0%
9 A COMPENDIUM
This graph excludes pensions for the Government service holders since that programme alone covers moreOF SOCIALPROTECTION
than 30 percent of the RESEARCHES
total SSP budget.
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 352
It should be noted that neither all these 85 programmes are social security programmes, nor all of these can
be consolidated. Furthermore, some programmes will not require consolidation at all due to their natural
phase out within the project deadline. All GoB-approved projects or programmes are categorised in two
categories based on their source of funds: (i) Revenue budget programmes, and (ii) Development budget
programmes.10 Table 6.1 shows the distribution of programmes by the source of funding. Revenue budget
programmes do not have any deadline and continue until the government decides to end them. 58 out of
the total 125 SSP listed programmes fall under this category. However, nearly two-thirds of these
programmes, 37 to be exact, can be categorised as small following the 0.5 per cent cut off criterion. The
Development Budget programmes primarily consist of projects undertaken by the GoB. In many cases, these
projects are devised and funded in collaboration with the development partners. Examples of such
programmes include ‘Reaching Out-of-School Children’ (co-funded by the World Bank), SWAPNO (co-funded
by the UNDP), Support to the Urban Health and Nutrition to the Urban Bangladesh (funded by the EU),
amongst others.11 Such programmes vary in duration and are omitted from the SSP list once phased out. The
number of programmes in development budget thus varies from year to year. From Table 6.1 we can see,
SSP Budget for FY2019-20 lists 54 such ongoing programmes out of which 38 are small. In addition, in the
2019-20 fiscal year, 13 new programmes/projects have been included in the development expenditure
where 10 programmes are small.
Following the selection procedure mentioned in the methodology section, we performed another round of
mapping (Annex Tables 6.13-6.15) of small SSPs for two reasons. First, not all the identified 85 programmes
were able to be harmonised. A close inspection of the programmes reveals that some of the programmes
are purely for construction, the supply of essential health and nutrition materials or utilities, etc. Essentially,
these programmes do not fit in the definition of the ‘social security programmes’ iconised in the NSSS. Nor
do these programmes require harmonisation. For instance, it is not required to bring ‘construction of colony
for the cleaners of Dhaka City Corporation’ and ‘construction of flood shelter in the flood and river erosion-
prone areas’ under a common umbrella. Furthermore, as has already been mentioned, most of the
development expenditure programmes are supposed to end at some point. Some of these programmes are
scheduled to end before 2021.12 Such programmes, which are mostly donor devised and funded, are less
10 Revenue expenditure and development expenditures have been relabeled as ‘Operating A COMPENDIUM
expenditures’ andOF SOCIALPROTECTION RESEARCHES
‘Development
expenditures’ from 2019-20.
11 All the names mentioned in this report follows as specified in the SSP list of the MoF. However, in some cases, discrepancies have
been noticed between the reported name on the project website and the MoF document. As such, the name of the programme
‘Support to the Urban Health and Nutrition to the Urban Bangladesh’ has been mentioned as ‘Support to health and nutrition to the
poor in Urban Bangladesh’ in the EU website ([Link]
accessed on 12 September 2019).
12 For instance, the EU ‘Support to the Urban Health and Nutrition to the Urban Bangladesh’ is scheduled to end in November 2019.
likely candidates for harmonisation. Pragmatically, if not extended further, these programmes will
automatically phase out by the time a finalised strategy for small SSP consolidation is adopted.
Table 6.2 provides an overview of important social security programmes in Bangladesh. Information
presented in the Table 6.2 include budgetary allocation per programme for FY2019-20 (in TK. crore), number
of beneficiaries (in Lakh), categorisation of the programme by size (large if the budget is more than 1% of
the total SSP allocation; medium if it is between 0.5% and 1%; and small if less than 0.5%), programme type:
whether the programme falls under lifecycle category (L), covariate risks (C), and special programme (S).
Based on the discussion and observation of the programme objectives, further analysis is performed on
whether the programmes had overlapping objectives. Finally, a remark has been made whether the
programme is an SSP, a Social Security Support Programme (SSSP), or neither of it (N). Out of the total of 42
selected small programmes, 19 are lifecycle support programmes, 20 are special programmes, and 3 are
covariate risk programmes. Even though small programmes comprise less than 5% of the total SSP budget,
harmonising these programmes will have important coordinated impacts on addressing risks and challenges
associated with different stages of the lifecycle. According to the NSSS 2015 report, both the number and
budget (in Tk.) of small social security programmes have been steadily increasing over the years. However,
we observed a declining trend in the percentage of GDP allocated for small programmes. A review of the
small SSPs also indicates that there is severe overlap among programmes in terms of programme goals, and
some are too small to have any meaningful impact on the targeted groups of the population. Due to the
duplicity, programmes that are similar in nature can be consolidated to make programme administration
more manageable and reduce the administrative cost of operation.
13 A COMPENDIUM
Unemployment and underemployment are considered as the major contributors to poverty. OFare
Both these rates SOCIALPROTECTION
substantially RESEARCHES
higher (almost double) for youth (aged 15-24) and women.
14 ‘Fund for Assistance to the Small Farmer and Poultry Farms’ is provided to the poultry farmers affected by the outbreak of bird
flu.
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 354
Moreover, some of the special programmes are entirely region-specific (such as for Haor areas, or
for coastal areas, etc.) and hence been labelled as ‘Region Specific Special Programme’.
- Based on the discussion and observation of the programme objectives, further analysis is done
whether the programmes had overlapping objectives.
- Finally, some comments have been made if the programme in question is SSP, Social Security Support
Programme (SSSP), or Neither of it (N).
LGD, Char Development and Settlement 10.18 227 0.31% S Region Specific Y N
MoLGRDC SP
Child protection and child welfare 0.00 189 0.25% S L C Y Y
Development of the Living Standard of the 0.00 183 0.25% S S N Y
Marginal People of Bangladesh
MoLand Gucchagram (Climate Victims Rehabilitation) 1.28 165 0.22% S Region Specific Y N
SP
MoPMEdu Reaching Out of School 5.60 156 0.21% S L C N Y
LGD, Coastal Climate Resilient Infrastructure 0.27 156 0.21% S Region Specific N N
MoLGRDC Improvement SP
MoSW Assistance for Cancer, Kidney and Liver Cirrhosis 0.30 150 0.20% S C Y Y
Patients
MoWCA Special Fund for Assistance to women 0.00 125 0.17% S L W Y Y
development & entrepreneurs
Child and Maternal Health & Health 0.00 108 0.15% S L C Y Y
Management Development
LGD, Urban Public Environmental Health Care (Devt. 0.00 104 0.14% S S N Y
MoLGRDC Programme)
MoF / FinDiv Fund for Assistance to the Small Farmer and 1.00 100 0.13% S C N Y
Poultry Farms
MoSW Stipend for Disabled Students 100.00 96 0.13% S L D N/A Y
MoWCA Income Generating Activities for Women at 0.30 91 0.12% S L W Y Y
Upazila Level
MoSW Programme for Improving the Livelihood of 0.81 67 0.09% S S Y Y
Harijan, Dalit, Bade community (Bede and
disadvantage community 2017-18)
MoSW Service and Assistance Centre for Disabled 3.76 65 0.09% S SSSP N/A N
Interest free Micro Credit Programme 0.21 58 0.08% S L W Y N
MoHFW Support to the Urban Health and Nutrition to 1.14 56 0.08% S L C Y Y
Bangladesh
Special Assistance for the development of Char, 0.23 50 0.07% S Region Specific Y N
Haor and development area SP
MoWCA Oppressed Women and Children Welfare Fund 0.00 50 0.07% S S Y N
PMO Lump Sum Provision for Development of Special 0.21 50 0.07% S Region Specific N/A N
Areas (Except Hill Tracts) SP
LGD, Strengthening Women’s Ability for Productive 0.00 43 0.06% S L W Y Y
MoLGRDC New Opportunities (SWAPNO)
Improved life Standard for low-income people 0.00 42 0.06% S L W Y Y
One interesting feature of the identified small SSPs is that most of them are operated by only a few ministries
(Figure 6.8). As such, out of 42 small programmes, 29 programmes are run by three ministries namely –
MoSW, MoLGRDC, and MoWCA. The largest number of small SSPs are administered by MoSW which runs 14
small SSP programmes worth of Tk. 736 crore. The MoLGRDC runs 8 programmes worth of Tk 797 crore,
followed by the MoWCA running 7 programmes worth of Tk 319 crore.
16
14 MoLGRDC, 854
Small programmes, #
12
MoWCA, 338
10 MoLand, 165
8
Others, 95
6
PMO, 50
4 MoHFW, 343
MoPMEd, 156 MoF, 335
2
0
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-2
In order of total small SSP allocation by ministries: from low to high
Source: RAPID Assessment based on MoF data provided by the SSPS office
Source: RAPID Assessment based on MoF data provided by the SSPS office
However, within the ministries, different bodies are sometimes undertaking different programmes, with
similar objectives. From Figure 6.9, it is observed that 14 small programmes identified for the MoSW are
implemented by three different bodies, namely – Department of Social Services (DSS), Neuro-Developmental
Disability Protection Trust (NDDPT), and the Sharirik Protibondhi Suroksha Trust (SPST). In the case of
MoWCA, the programmes are implemented by Jatiya Mohila Samity (JMS), Department of Women Affairs
(DWA), Bangladesh Shishu Academy (BSA), and the ministry itself. All the programmes from the MoLGRDC
are implemented by Local Government Division (LGD), and the Rural Development and Co-operatives
Division (RDCD).
“In recent years, there has been a rapid expansion in the number of small schemes. Much of this has
been led by development partners, usually well intentioned, as new approaches have been piloted
and specific challenges addressed. However, with the formulation of core programmes of the NSSS,
it is important that these schemes are adding value in terms of innovative ideas with prospects for
scaling up and joining up. It is also critical that the governance arrangements to be put in place
anticipate coordination of the development partners’ support to allow the vision of consolidated
social security programming to function fully. Under the leadership of the GED of the Planning
Commission, each sponsoring Ministry of these small schemes e.g. schemes of Ministry of Fisheries
and Livestock, Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Ministry of Youth and Sports, Ministry of Expatriate
Welfare and Overseas Employment etc. will be responsible for determining the value of these
schemes and, present a business case if they believe that the programme should continue. Under the
leadership of GED, the Planning Commission will, on the basis of the business cases, make proposals
to Cabinet Division on which schemes should continue.”
- NSSS (pp. 60-61)
This section proposes a pragmatic approach in consolidating the small SSPs. It undertakes the core NSSS
theme, i.e., ‘programme consolidation along with the life cycle risks’ (NSSS, pp. XXII), as the departing point
for framework preparation. All the programmes are clustered around the lifecycle risks, covariate risks, or
special programmes based on their observed objectives. Finally, based on the analysis of the objectives of
the programmes, this section proposes an optimal strategic framework for programme consolidation.
The NSSS provides a systematic framework for revising the overall social security structure. It divides the
implementation time into two phases. In phase I (2015-2025), it aims to shift from discretionary to a targeted
universal approach. In this regard, it emphasises on consolidating all programmes along with lifecycle risks.
One of the major strengths of the NSSS is its provision of a detailed outline of the programmes to be
considered for each stage of the lifecycle (Table 6.3). For instance, it suggested that two core programmes
for children, one for ensuring early child development (0-4) and the other for enhancing the access and
integration to education for all children (5-18). For the working age population (19-59), it suggests
strengthening the education, training programmes, and workfare programmes. Noting the need for more
emphasised vision for vulnerable women, it suggested for developing the Vulnerable Women’s Benefit
15 A COMPENDIUM
The NSSS Midterm Implementation Review was still in the draft phase when this report OF SOCIALPROTECTION RESEARCHES
was being prepared..
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 360
programme. In addition, it also emphasised for maternal health care, provision of day-care centres, etc. For
the elderly, the NSSS suggests a universal old age allowance programme (age 60+) along with new pension
schemes such as Private Voluntary Pensions and National Social Insurance Schemes. Lastly, the NSSS suggests
for initiating Child Dependency Benefit programme and Working Age Dependency Benefit Programme for
the PWDs.
Table 6.3: An overview of the NSSS suggestions on aligning the SSPs along the lifecycle
Programme name/ Core programmes stipulated by the NSSS Specific suggestions
category
Programmes for Children • A child grant for children of the poor and vulnerable family up to age 4. The child grant will be • Child Benefit Programme
(0-18) limited to a maximum of two children per family to avoid any adverse implications on the • Primary and Secondary School Stipends
population policy. • Continuing Orphan’s and
• A school stipend for all primary and secondary school-going children and adolescents from the School Meals Programmes
poor and vulnerable households. • Ensuring Child Maintenance
• Child disability benefit programme; school meals programme; Programme for the orphans Payment for Abandoned Children
abandoned children. • Strengthen Immunization, Child Healthcare,
• Strengthening supply-side interventions relating to immunization, childcare health and nutrition, Nutrition and Water and Sanitation
water supply, sanitation, and nutrition outreach. Programmes.
Programmes for the • Strengthening education and training programmes to motivate the adolescents and youth to • Strengthen Education and Training for the
Working Age complete education; enabling the workforce to acquire required skills. youth
• Strengthening workfare programmes for the unemployed poor. Convert food-based workfare • Consolidate Workfare
programmes into cash-based programmes and consolidate fragmented schemes. Programmes
• Exploring possibilities of providing unemployment, sickness, maternity and accidental insurance • Implement MHVS.
as a part of a National Social Insurance Scheme (NSIS). • Consolidate VGD and Programme for Destitute
• Implementing a programme of financial support to vulnerable women (widows, divorced, Women into one VWB
destitute, single mother, and unemployed women including adolescent girls) and facilitate their programme.
participation in the labour force. The strategy advocates for a consolidated income transfer • Provision of Childcare across all Formal &
under Vulnerable Women’s Benefit (VWB) programme. Informal job places.
• The strategy provides for expansion of the Maternal Health Voucher Scheme (MHVS)
administered by the HSD and MEFWD of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
Comprehensive Pension • The Old Age Allowance for senior citizens who are aged 60 years and above and belong to the • Old Age Allowance (age 60 +) should be
System for Elderly poor and vulnerable population. continued; the benefits should be revised from
• Explore possibilities to establish a National Social Insurance Scheme (NSIS), to be managed under time to time to adjust for the inflation
the Insurance Development & Regulatory Authority (IDRA) under the provision of the Insurance • Introducing National Social Insurance Scheme
Act-2010, based on the principle of employers and employees jointly paying contribution. The (NSIS)
NSIS would provide pensions as well as address other contingencies (such as disability, sickness, • Private Voluntary Pensions scheme should be in
unemployment and maternity). place
• Review options to facilitate the development of Private Voluntary Pension (PVP), which would
be open to all citizens irrespective of occupation or formality of employment.
Programmes for People • A comprehensive disability benefits programme should be initiated incorporating lifecycle risks. • A disability benefit for children with disabilities
with Disabilities • 60+ persons with disabilities should receive old allowances along with an additional amount • A disability benefit for working-age population
with disabilities
Source: NSSS (2015), NSSS Implementation Action Plan
These different types of small SSPs are discussed in detail in the following sections of this chapter.
The Maternal, Child, Reproductive, and Adolescent Health Programme (MCRAHP) came into operation in
FY2011-12. As per the operation plan, the project was initially scheduled to be completed by June 2016,
which was later extended.17 The project is being implemented by the Directorate General of Family Planning
(DGFP). The programme is intended to “ensure healthy reproductive life of women and adolescent during
pregnancy and childbirth and throughout the whole span of reproductive life by skilled service providers”
(DGHS, 2019). The specific objectives of the programmes are as follows:
The programme objectives are quite overlapping with another large programme being implemented by the
Directorate General of Health Services, under the Health Service Division of the MoHFW.19 The Programme,
named ‘Maternal Neonatal Child and Adolescent Health’ (MNCAH), is a large programme as per the
definition followed in this study (Table 6.15). The programme is being continued since 2011 and will be
completed in June 2022. This programme has five major components, namely – (i) Maternal Health, (ii)
Expanded Programme on Immunisation, (iii) National New-born Health Programme (NNHP)) and Integrated
Management of Childhood Illness ((IMCI), (iv) Adolescent Health, and (v) School Health. Along with training
of the service providers, it incorporates awareness-raising activities, workshops, etc. The programme has a
budget of Tk 929 crore and aims to reach 698 lac persons per month.
It must be noted that both the programmes have several unique features. For example, the DGFP run
‘MCRAHP’ programme is more focused on family planning, and reproductive health. On the other hand, the
programme run by DGHS (MNCAC) has a major focus on immunisation, neonatal care, childhood illness,
school health programme, etc. However, both the programmes have similar training components (such as
midwifery and training of the doctors, nurses and other medical service providers), reproductive healthcare
plans, service delivery mechanism, etc. If the programmes are combined into a single programme, a more
enhanced operational outcome can be achieved.
As for the Child and Maternal Health and Health Management Development Programme, the study team
could not retrieve any operational manual/project documents. However, based on interviews with SSP
experts the programme was identified as a project on strengthening the health management system.
Moreover, given that the programme does not have any beneficiaries but yearly expenditures, it is assumed
that the programme is a delivery programme for service equipment, training, or capacity building.
Figure 6.10: Maternal, Child, Reproductive and Figure 6.11: Child and Maternal Health & Health
Adolescent Health Management Development
250 800 Revised Budget*
Beneficiary number
700
200
Budget (crore)
107.9
150 500
400
100 300
50 200
100
0 0
44.95
6.95
Revised Budget*
0
0
0
Number of beneficiary (revised, in lacs) FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20
Figure 6.12: Support to the Urban Health and Figure 6.13: Providing Primary Health,
Nutrition to Bangladesh Reproductive Health and Nutrition Services to
Underprivileged Woman and Children
60 1.2 35
50 1
Budget (crore)
30
Beneficiaries
40 0.8 25
30 0.6
20
20 0.4
15
10 0.2
10
0 0
5
0
FY2018-19 FY2019-20
One other programme - Urban Health and Nutrition to Bangladesh - is a European Union (EU) funded project
being implemented by the LGD of the MoLGRDC. The project aims to “support NGOs to work with
municipalities to deliver primary healthcare and nutrition to the poor residents of urban slums while building
institutions for long-term sustainable service delivery and coordination”.20 It also aims at strengthening the
MoLGRDC and LGD in addressing the urban heath responsibilities and ensure the provision of urban health
services. As mentioned in the project website, the main objectives of this programme are:
• Strengthening the capacity of MoHFW to coordinate, develop and enforce essential health, nutrition
and population service quality standards, monitoring system and accreditation as the centralized
and decentralized levels
The programme is conducted in Dhaka South and North City Corporations, Chattogram City Corporation,
Mymensingh City Corporation, and 11 Pouroshovas. With a budget of Tk. 57 crores, its target is to reach 1.14
lac beneficiaries. The project is expected to be completed by November 2019, meaning that the programme
will face a natural consolidation if it is not extended further. 21 However, given that programmes with similar
nature have previously received extensions after the project deadline, this programme is also picked for
harmonisation.
Another small programme focusing on maternal health, child health and nutrition is “Primary Health,
Reproductive Health and Nutrition Services to underprivileged Women and Children”.22 The programme is
currently being implemented by the MoWCA and Bangladesh Family Planning Association (BFPA) in 21
districts. The three-year-long project starting since July 2018, aims to provide family planning, reproductive
health services, health and nutrition services to pregnant mother, and children. The project also aims to
modernise the medical equipment available in the project area. The total budget for the project is 98.3 crore
where 19 crores have been allocated for 2019-20.
A number of components of both of the aforementioned programmes overlap with the objective of the
National Nutrition Services (NNS), one of the large SSP programmes. The NNS aims to increase demand and
utilisation of services, develop the capacity of the community to understand and address the malnutrition
problems, develop capacity through training, advocacy etc. As per the operational manual, some of the NNS
objectives are as follows: 23
crore. Based on earlier documents on this project it is observed that under the ELCD project, MoWCA
operated nearly 1400 pre-primary centres for more than 41,000 children aged 5+, more than 500 Child
Development Centres for 16050 children aged 4+, and 20 day-care centres for 400 children aged 3-5 years.
As an important part of the project, it integrates autism and other disabilities (MoWCA, 2017).
Figure 6.14: Early Learning for Child Development Figure 6.15: Reaching Out of School
30 1.2 250 6
Beneficiary, Lacs
25 1 5
Budget (Crore)
Budget (crore)
200
Benediciary
20 0.8 4
150
15 0.6 3
100
10 0.4 2
5 0.2 50 1
0 0 0 0
There are several other large programmes which have similar components as the ELCD. For instance, within
the MoWCA, Jatiaya Mohila Samity, and the MoWCA runs several other day-care centres on top of the ELCD
programme. In addition, the MoSW also runs several day-care centres. It is also noteworthy that the GoB
has already officially mandated pre-primary education in its education policy. The programmes being carried
out for children with a disability under this programme is similar in nature to the programmes being carried
on by DSS.
It is noteworthy that, even if all these small programmes of different ministries are combined together, the
number is too small to meet the actual requirement under an ideal scenario. Therefore, an outright
consolidation of these programmes might not be the appropriate approach. Rather, the GoB can adopt a
gradual approach in harmonising these programmes.
The Reaching Out-of-School (ROSC) is an endeavour of the Government of Bangladesh to provide a second
chance to education for disadvantaged children aged 8-14 years who never had the chance to enrol in the
primary schools or had to drop out due to other necessities. The project is currently being implemented by
the Directorate of the Primary Education, under the Ministry of Primary and Mass Education with assistance
from the World Bank. The broad objective of the project is “to improve equitable access, retention and
completion in quality primary education for out-of-school children in selected under-served areas”. In
principle, ROSC has four components, namely: 27
(iii) Enhancing project implementation capacity through the mobilization of communities and
partner agencies
(iv) Establishing an effective monitoring and evaluation system.
The programme beneficiaries are provided with free books, education materials, exam fees, uniforms, and
education allowances. As a part of this programme learning centres (also known as ‘Ananda Schools’) are
established where teachers are appointed from the respective catchment areas. The project area includes
148 Upazilas and slums from the 11 city corporations. It has also undertaken a pre-vocational training
program targeting 25,000 ROSC graduates, students from the Shishu Kallyan Trust, as well as graduates from
the Government Primary schools aged 15+. With an average annual budget of Tk. 200 crore, the programme
has been targeted to 5.6 lac out-of-school students across the country.
The programme is unique in the sense that it targets children aged 8-15 who have dropped out of school.
However, it is noteworthy that, the GoB has undertaken several programmes to reduce dropout rates in
primary and secondary education. Attempts such as the universal primary education stipend programme,
universal midday meal programme28, free books programme, etc. are portraits of these efforts. Hence, some
of the programme’s unique features (such as exam fees, uniforms) can be introduced in the regular
primary/secondary education programmes. Moreover, the pre-vocational training programme of this project
can be incorporated in the regular curricula of the vocational training centres.
28 A COMPENDIUM
All primary schools will be brought under midday meal by 2023. Now it will be covered in theOF SOCIALPROTECTION
Haor, Char and other RESEARCHES
underdeveloped areas. [Link]
approves-national-school-meal-policy-draft
29
[Link]
01036a0d2c35/%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%8F%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%
BF-%E0%A6%AA%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%B2%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AA
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 368
Figure 6.16: Child protection and child welfare Figure 6.17: Street Children Rehabilitation
Programme
200.00 5 0.025
Budget (crore)
Beneficiary
4 0.02
150.00 3 0.015
2 0.01
100.00 1 0.005
0 0
50.00
-
FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20
Providing Primary Health, MoWCA and Capacity building of the government medical The programme objectives are overlapping The programme components completely align
Reproductive Health and Family Planning centres in 21 districts. The programme aims to with the MCRAH and MNCAH. with the NSSS stipulated ‘Child Benefit’ (or,
Nutrition Services to Association of provide healthcare services to pregnant mother recently drafted ‘Agamir Shishu’ programme).
Underprivileged Woman Bangladesh and young children.
and Children
Early Learning for Child Bangladesh Ensuring a coherent implementation strategy for Day-care centres are being run by MoSW, All the day-care centres and child
Development Shishu early childcare and development. MoWCA, JMS, as well as BSA. development centres should be operated
Academy, through a single organisation.
MoWCA
Programme Name Ministry/ Programme objective Similar major programme envisaged in the Remarks
Division NSSS/already existing large programmes
The programme consists of interventions such as The pre-primary education has already The pre-primary education programme should
Parenting and Caregiving Education, Child been incorporated in the government plan. be harmonised with the MoPME drafted pre-
Development Centres, Pre-School, and ECCD primary education programme
Advocacy and Training.
Small SSPs and their administering authorities, programme objectives, and similar programmes that are
envisaged in the NSSS for the working-age population are discussed in Table 6.7.
Another programme with exactly the same name is being implemented by the Department of Women Affairs
(DWA) (Bangladesh Economic Review, 2019).32 With a similar programme objective, this programme is
currently in operation in 64 districts at 473 Upazilas. The loan is provided for IGA Income Generating
Activities) such as purchasing sewing machines, livestock and poultry farming, small business, aquacultures,
etc. In addition, the programme contains awareness raising components on the use of sanitary latrines,
contraceptive use, primary health check-up, dowry, child marriages, etc. It is noteworthy that this
programme is not separately enlisted in the MoF prepared Social Safety Net budget.
30 No operational manual or other documents were found for this programme during theAreview.
COMPENDIUM OF information
Source of this SOCIALPROTECTION
is the RESEARCHES
Budget document (FY2019-20) for the MoSW available at:
[Link]
[Link]; accessed on 20 September 2019.
31 The project information is obtained from: [Link] ; and
[Link]
13%20%28English-2019%[Link] accessed on 20 September 2019
32 The project information is available at (however, not updated): [Link]
Figure 6.18: Interest free Micro Credit Programme Figure 6.19: Micro-credit for Women Self-
employment
0.35 70 0.4 7
0.35 6
0.3 60
0.3 5
Beneficiary, lacs
0.25 50 0.25
Budget, crore
4
0.2
0.2 40 3
0.15
0.15 30 0.1 2
0.05 1
0.1 20
0 0
0.05 10
0 0
FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20
All the aforementioned programmes overlap quite well with microcredit programmes operated by the Palli
Karma Sahayak Foundation (PKSF). The Government of Bangladesh established the PKSF in 1990 with a view
to reducing poverty through employment generation. One of the major objectives of the PKSF is to provide
financial assistance and institutional development support for creating productive employment
opportunities for poor, small and marginal farmers, and micro-entrepreneurs. It executes its operations
through 278 partner organisations (POs). There are several major large microcredit programmes being
conducted by the PKSF. A close observation on the operations of its units (for instance, Environment and
Climate Change Unit, Fisheries and Livestock Unit, Agriculture Unit, etc.), or its flagship programmes (such
‘Enhancing Resources and Increasing Capacities of Poor Household towards Elimination of their Poverty
(ENRICH)’) reveal that all the components of the ‘interest-free microcredit programme’, or ‘microcredit for
women self-employment’ are overlapping.. As per the MoF data, microcredit operations through the PKSF
has received an allocation of Tk. 785 crore in FY 2019-20. Through its POs, PKSF aims to reach 268 lac persons
per month in this fiscal year.33 During the interview with the government officials, it was identified that the
Cabinet Division has already agreed to implement a ‘Somonnito Microcredit Programme’.
There are two programmes which are aimed at skill enhancement: (i) Skill for Employment Investment
Programme (SEIP) and; (ii) Skill and Employment Programme in Bangladesh (SEP-B). Among these two
programmes, SEIP can be classified as a medium programme (with a budget slightly higher than 0.5% of the
SSPs).
Skill and employment programme in Bangladesh, also known as ‘Sudokkho’, is a five-year skills training and
employment programme being implemented by the Directorate of Technical Education, Government of
Bangladesh with funding supports from the Department for International Development (DFID) and Swiss
Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC).34 The objective of the programme is to reduce poverty
through better training and job opportunities for the poor. It aims to ensure employment to 65,000 poor
people, including women and disadvantaged population, upon completion of training through its
partnerships with private training service providers (PTPs), and industry-based training initiatives. Although
33 A COMPENDIUM
As specified in the MoF data. A person is counted four times a month if he receives the benefit four timesOF SOCIALPROTECTION RESEARCHES
a month.
34 Source: [Link] and [Link]
finder/project/-/show/[Link] ; both accessed on 18
September 2019
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 373
the MoF data does not provide the number of beneficiaries, as per the project website, since the beginning
of the programme in 2015, 1,735 men and 15,324 women graduated from Sudokkho supported industry-led
training system. The training is provided in the Readymade Garments and Construction Sectors.
Figure 6.20: Skill and Employment Programme Figure 6.21: Skills for Employment Investment
in Bangladesh Programme
400 3 500
350 450
2.5 400
300 350
2
250 300
200 1.5 250
150 200
1 150
100 100
0.5
50 50
0 0 0
A similar, however, a broader version of SEP-B is observed in the MoF led ‘Skills for Employment Investment
Programme’.35 The project has been drawn up by the GoB for boosting up the supply of skilled labour force
while reducing the existing skill mismatch/shortage in the industry. The programme has selected six priority
sectors, which are as follows:
The total project cost is estimated to be $1,070 million (equivalent to more than Tk. 9,000 crores) for the
period of 2014-21. The programme aims to align its curriculum and training modules in line with the training
programmes from reputed overseas institutions. The programme targets 1.5 million beneficiaries in the
labour force including the new entrants. The training is provided through both public and private sector
institutions including some NGOs as showed in Table 6.6.
Figure 6.22: Income Generating Activities for Figure 6.23: Women's Skill Based Training For
Women at Upazila Level Livelihood
0.35 100 8
90 7
0.3
80 6
()Beneficiary, lac)
0.25
Budget (crore)
70 5
0.2 60 4
50
0.15 3
40
2
0.1 30
1
20
0.05 0
10
0 0
FY2017- FY2018- FY2019-
18 19 20
The study team could not trace any programmes/operational manuals with this exact programme name.
However, the team identified a similar programme in operation by the JMS Jatiya Mahila Samity titled
‘Women’s Skill Development Training’.37 (JMS) has been implementing this programme aiming at the poor
unemployed women. Women are provided training on tailoring, embroidery, block boutique, tie-dye
printing, leather crafts, food preparations and preservation, etc. All these training courses include awareness
components on health and hygiene education, childcare, women rights, violence against women, child
marriage, etc. The programme is being implemented in 64 districts and 50 Upazila branches.
36 A COMPENDIUM
Source: [Link] accessed on OF SOCIALPROTECTION
20 August 2019. RESEARCHES
37 For details, see: [Link] accessed 9 September 2019
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 375
- Poverty alleviation and economic self-reliance for the poor, destitute, and asset-less women to make
them equal partners in national development along with men.
- Induce the growth in the production and provide the marketing facilities of home-made products by
training women in productive and demand-driven income-generating activities.
- Prepare women to undertake active and entrepreneurial role by providing training on skill
development, and provide awareness on empowerment, rights, duties, and leadership to them.
The programme provides training on ten different vocational trades, namely sewing and embroidery, block-
boutique and skin print, production of soaps, candles and showpieces, food processing and storage, binding
and packaging, Nakshi Kantha and cutting, manufacture of leather goods, poultry farming, beautification,
and mobile phone servicing. The training programmes are being offered through 75 training centres across
the country (10 in Dhaka city and the other 65 in 63 districts). It also has provisions for sales and display
centres in Dhaka city. At present, the second phase of the programme is ongoing (from July 2016 – June
2020) with a total budget of Tk. 86 crore. The project aims to reach 45,000 marginal women within the
stipulated time.
Figure 6.24: Urban Based Marginal Women Figure 6.25: Strengthening Women’s Ability for
Development Productive New Opportunities (SWAPNO
0.6 25 0.045 60
0.04
0.5 20 50
0.035
0.4 0.03 40
15 0.025
0.3 30
10 0.02
0.2 0.015 20
5 0.01
0.1 10
0.005
0 0 0 0
Division with assistance from the UNDP. At present, the programme is being implemented in 1030 unions in
106 Upazilas of 22 districts with 65,000 primary beneficiaries. The project is scheduled to end in 2019.
However, it is noteworthy to remember that the NSSS particularly emphasised on expanding the coverage
of SWAPNO project.
During the desk research, the study identified several other programmes which have similar objectives but
were not part of the MoF list of SSPs. One such programme not listed in the MoF list of SSPs is the ‘Promotion
of Women Entrepreneurs of Economic Empowerment Project (Phase 3)’ which is currently being operated
by the JMS.40 The project started in 2015 and is scheduled to end in June 2020. Under this project, the JMS
will provide training in 30 Upazilas from 26 districts on 6 trades, namely business management,
beautification, fashion designing, catering, interior design, and event management (only in Dhaka), and bee
and mushroom cultivation (areas excluding Dhaka). The programme aims to reach 82,500 women within the
project deadline. As a part of the programme, it also aims to assist the women entrepreneurs in marketing
their produce. Amongst plans, it also envisages establishing 10 parlours and 30 display and distribution
centres. Between April 2016 and July 2019, 77,950 unemployed and destitute women have been trained
under this scheme.
In addition to other programmes, a training programme is currently being provided by the JMS titled
“District-based women computer training project (64 districts)”. 41 The project has been in place since July
2013 and will continue till June 2021. With a budget of Tk. 87 crore, the project aims to provide computer
and ICT training to 42,206 unemployed women. Since the inception of the project, in total 29,406 women
have been trained (till July 2019).
The brief overview of the programmes being run by the DWA and JMS show an overlapping number of
programme items. For instance, Income Generating Activities for Women at Upazila Level, Women's Skill-
Based Training for Livelihood, and urban-based marginal women benefit programme – all offer training on
similar trades. In some cases, similar training programmes are being offered by the JMS and DWA under two
different projects in the same district.
e. Other small SSPs for working-age: Employment of Ultra poor in Northern Areas: 42
This programme is being implemented by the Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB). The second
phase of the project ran during April 2014-March 2019 which has been later extended till June 2020. The
project area covers Rangpur, Gaibandha, Nilphamari, and Lalmonirhat. The objectives of the programme
include:
- Providing training on income-generating activities to the poor men and women from 35 Upazilas of
this project
- Strengthening social as well as food security through self-employment
- Creating supply linkages for the beneficiaries of this project so that their product is well supplied to
the market
- Enhancing market linkages and easing the access to raw materials for the programme beneficiaries
- Providing microcredits to the beneficiaries (at 6% annual interest rate)
On average, the programme has served 7,000 poor and marginalised people each year.
25
Budget, crore
0.066
0.064 20
0.062 15
0.06
10
0.058
0.056 5
0.054 0
FY2014-15 FY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20
Beneficiary Budget
Two other small SSPs that can be classified as programmes for the working-age are “Special Fund for
Assistance to Women Development & Entrepreneurs” and “Improved Life Standard for Low-Income People”.
However, for these two programmes, no document or information was available for discussion.
42 A COMPENDIUM
Source: [Link] OF SOCIALPROTECTION
accessed on 11 September RESEARCHES
2019.
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 378
Figure 6.27: Fund for Assistance to the Small Farmer and Poultry Farms
1.6 120
1.4
100
1.2
80
1
0.8 60
0.6
40
0.4
20
0.2
0 0
FY2013-14 FY2014-15 FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20
Beneficiary Budget
It is noteworthy that this allocation is not appropriated every year and is only utilised when crises arise.
Moreover, this is not the only such emergency fund kept for crises mitigation. One of the largest covariate
shock mitigation programmes is the Gratuitous Relief (GR).44 The GR provides both cash, as well as kind (such
as food, warm clothes, etc.) supports to the people at distress. The fund is allocated for each of the districts.
Under the jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner (DC) of the district, it is possible to disburse the fund at
the quickest possible time.
Figure 6.28: Fund for the Welfare of Burnt and Figure 6.29: Assistance for Cancer, Kidney and
Disabled Liver Cirrhosis Patients
0.335 3.5 0.35 160
0.33 140
3 0.3
0.325
2.5 0.25 120
0.32
0.315 100
2 0.2
0.31 80
0.305 1.5 0.15
60
0.3 1 0.1
0.295 40
0.5 0.05 20
0.29
0.285 0 0 0
A brief summary of the implementing authorities and objectives of the special small social security
programmes are presented in Table 6.9.
(i) Programme for Improving the Livelihood of Harijan, Dalit, Bade community
(ii) Programme for Improving the Livelihood of Trans Gender (Hijra)
(iii) Programme for Livelihood Improvement of tea-garden labourers
(iv) Rehabilitation and Creation of Alternative Employment for Beggars Profession
• Providing education to the Bade and other disadvantaged communities. To achieve this goal, the
programme has four steps of the action plan. It provides stipends of Tk. 300, Tk. 450, Tk. 600, and
Tk. 1000 to the primary, secondary, higher secondary, and college-going students respectively of
disadvantaged communities.
• Arranging stipend-based training programmes for the working-age Bede and other disadvantaged
communities in order to improve their income generation skills and bring them to the mainstream
society.
• Upon receiving the training each person gets rehabilitation assistance of TK. 10,000.
• Providing a benefit of Tk. 500 to Bede and other disadvantaged and insolvent people if they are
above 50 years old.
programme has expanded to cover all 64 districts. During 2018-19 the number of beneficiaries from this
programme was 6,000 and the allocated budget was Tk. 11 crore. Whereas, in 2019-20 the allocated budget
is Tk. 6 crores. Among around 10,000 transgender people in Bangladesh, 6,000 are receiving some benefits
from this special programme.
• In order to educate the school-going transgender population, a four steps action plan has been
undertaken. It provides stipends of Tk. 700, Tk. 800, Tk. 1000, and Tk. 1200 to the primary,
secondary, higher secondary, and college-going students respectively.
• Providing a benefit of Tk. 600 to disadvantaged and insolvent transgender people if they are above
50 years old.
• Arranging stipend-based training programmes for the working-age transgender people in order to
improve their income generation skills and bring them to the mainstream society.
• Upon receiving the training each person gets rehabilitation assistance of Tk. 10,000
Support towards the people from marginalised groups needs to be strengthened and
redesigned
Md. Sorab Sordar is a snake charmer (Bede) and fisherman. He lives in a boat with his family in
Bhola Sadar Upazila. His income is a mere amount of Tk. 6,000-Tk 7,000 per month.
Sorab feels antagonised as he exclaims that Bede community like him has been left out in large from
the GoB programmes. Neither the government nor the private NGOs have large programmes for
them. “We are never welcomed or invited to any program” – he says with a sigh. “One and half
years ago, the UNO office asked for a list of the Bede community and we submitted it. However,
still, we have not heard anything”, he recalls. He also remarked that his children cannot get an
education because of social discrimination. Also, his children do not receive any kind of scholarships
available in the SSPs. “We are Bangladeshi by birth but unfortunately, we do not get any help from
the government as other citizens get” – he says miserably.
Sorab thinks it is not some monthly allowance of food or cash but training in income-generating
activities that can transform his life. Leaving his profession behind he wants to move on his life.
“We want a better and non-discriminating society to live in. Since the changing society’s perception
is not possible, help us to change our occupation” – he concludes.
Khairun, a resident of Netrokona, is a transgender student without any income. She lives with her
brother. She claims that Hijra who are girlish can stay with their family. However, a large group of
Hijra lives in communes. According to her, such groups are sometimes involved in hijacking and
prostitution.
She said that her parents do not care for her enough as they do for his brother. Feeling abandoned
at home, a few years back she left home for a Hijra commune but could not survive there more than
7 days, and she escaped back to home.
Now, she wants to study attentively and become successful. She does not want to identify herself
as a hijra anymore. She is a beneficiary of the programme run by the Department of Social Services.
She has received training on the computer from the program. She had to travel to the District
Headquarter for the training daily. Although the programme provided transport allowances,
travelling daily was troublesome due to unavailable transportation services. She successfully
completed the 50-day training programme and attained the first position in the class. Although they
were promised that the first-place achiever will be awarded a computer, however, that was not
true. Instead, the first ten trainees in the merit list were given Tk. 10,000 each after they met the
Deputy Commissioner of Netrokona. She claims that, after receiving complaints from them, the DSS
Officer was transferred.
Although Khairun has received a certificate from the training programme, she does not want to use
it anywhere as it refers to her as a hijra. “Although there is a huge demand for trained computer
operators in Netrokona, nobody actually wants to hire a Hijra” – she says mournfully. The social
perception would not allow her to continue the job unscathed even if she manages one. She
suggests that the certificate should not refer them as Hijra. She also thinks financial supports from
the Government for setting up businesses can help them a lot. Also, training in other Income
Generating Activities such as cooking, driving, handicrafts, or homestead gardening, etc. will also
be very effective.
Tk. 25 crores budget has been allocated for this programme during the 2019-20 financial year. Last year
(2018-2019) 50,000 tea-garden labourers were benefitted from this programme and the number has been
increasing over the years. The number of beneficiaries for the livelihood improvement of tea-garden
labourers tripled from 10,000 in 2015 to 30,000 in 2017. However, it still covered only one-fourth of the total
tea-garden labourers in the country.
The programme was initiated in August 2010, even though the scale of the operation was very limited. During
the 2018-19 financial year, the fund for this programme was distributed among 38 districts of Bangladesh.
During 2019-20, the allocated budget for this programme is Tk. 4 crores. The coverage of Rehabilitation and
Creation of Alternative Employment for Beggars’ Profession has not improved significantly over the years.
For instance, just 8,000 people are getting benefits under Rehabilitation and Creation of Alternative
Employment for Beggars’ Profession, while – according to the Ministry of Social Welfare, there are more
than 100,000 beggars in Dhaka city alone.
Figure 6.30: Programme for Improving the Figure 6.31: Programme for Improving the
Livelihood of Harijan, Dalit, Bade community Livelihood of Trans Gender (Hijra)
80 0.9 0.07 12
70 0.8 0.06 10
60 0.7
0.6 0.05 8
50 0.04
0.5
40 6
0.4 0.03
30 0.3 4
20 0.02
0.2
10 0.01 2
0.1
0 0 0 0
Figure 6.32: Programme for Livelihood Figure 6.33: Rehabilitation and Creation of
Improvement of tea-garden labourers Alternative Employment for Beggars Profession
0.6 30 0.09 4.5
0.08 4
0.5 25
0.07 3.5
0.4 20 0.06 3
0.05 2.5
0.3 15
0.04 2
0.2 10 0.03 1.5
0.02 1
0.1 5
0.01 0.5
0 0 0 0
The programme has been effective since May 2010. Even though the original closing date of the programme
was June 2017, later it was extended till June 2020. This programme has served on average 24 lakh
beneficiaries annually from 2013 to 2018. Overall, we can see a declining trend in the allocated budget for
this small SSP. For the 2019-20 financial year, the allocated budget for this programme is TK. 103.8 crores.
- To improve the public and environmental health conditions in the urban areas of Bangladesh,
particularly in the six city corporations (Barisal, Chattogram, Dhaka, Khulna, Rajshahi, and Sylhet).
- Reduce child mortality and morbidity by reducing the prevalence of waterborne and food-related
diseases.
- Increase productivity by reducing overall morbidity, improve the health status, and the quality of life
of poor urban inhabitants.
- To improve the public and environmental health conditions as well as sanitation in the urban areas
of Bangladesh, particularly in the six city corporations (Barisal, Chittagong, Dhaka, Khulna, Rajshahi,
and Sylhet).
Beneficiary Budget
50 A COMPENDIUM
The districts include: Barisal division: Barisal, Bhola, Jhalokati, Pirojpur, Barguna, Patuakhali; OF SOCIALPROTECTION
Dhaka division: Faridpur, RESEARCHES
Gopalganj, Madaripur, Rajbari, Shariatpur; Khulna division:Jessore, Jhenaidah, Magura, Narail, Bagerhat, Khulna, Satkhira,
Chuadanga and Meherpur.
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 388
has been 62,000 per year. According to the project document, the project was scheduled to end in 2019.
However, the programme is being continued and both the number of beneficiaries and the amount of budget
allocation has been increased for this programme.
Figure 6.35: Development of the Living Figure 6.36: Bangladesh Agricultural Infrastructure
Standard of the Marginal People of Development Project
Bangladesh 45 0.9
200 40 0.8
35 0.7
180
30 0.6
160 25 0.5
140 20 0.4
120 15 0.3
100 10 0.2
80 5 0.1
60 0 0
40
20
0
FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20
Beneficiary Budget
Beneficiary Budget
Figure 6.37: Settlement Construction for Figure 6.38: Rural Infrastructure Development
improvement of Rural Livelihood 2500
0.012 60
2000
0.01 50
1500
0.008 40
1000
0.006 30
0.004 20 500
0.002 10 0
0 0
Budget
Beneficiary Budget
Rehabilitation and MoSW Rehabilitation and creation of The NSSS recognises the -
Creation of Alternative alternative employment importance of special
Employment for opportunities for beggars. programmes for marginalised
Beggars Profession Provide training to the beggars to groups of people and
improve their income-generating suggests for strengthening
abilities. the supports.
Agriculture LGD, The objective of the project is to - Some of the components of this
Infrastructure MoLGRDC improve (i) Vertical Infrastructure programme are similar to other
Improvement like Markets and Collection Centres existing large programmes (such as
(Bangladesh (ii) Horizontal infrastructure like the Haor Area Livelihood
Agriculture roads, irrigation and drainage Improvement Programme). Some of
Infrastructure system. its objectives are overlapping with
Development Project) the Coastal Climate Resilient
Infrastructure Improvement
Programme.
The overall objective of CDSP IV is to improve the economic situation and living condition of the population
in the coastal areas of south-eastern Bangladesh with special reference to the poorest segment of the
population. The activities are divided into six project components: 1. Protection for Climate Change, 2.
Climate-resilient Infrastructure, 3. Land Settlement and Titling, 4. Livelihood Support, 5. Field Level
Institutions, and 6. Surveys and Studies, Operation and Maintenance.
Similar major programme: Haor Infrastructure and livelihood Improvement Project (HILIP)
(ii) Special Assistance for the Development of Char, Haor and Undeveloped Area is another small
programme that entails the economic improvement of chars in Bangladesh. This programme has a budget
of TK. 50 crore in 2019-20. The number of beneficiaries last year was around 90,000. The programme has
some overlapping objectives with the CDSP IV programme.
Both CDSP IV and Special Assistance for the Development of Char, Haor, and Undeveloped Area have some
common objectives as with the Haor Infrastructure and Livelihood Development Programme being
implemented by the LGD, MoLGRDC. There is another programme specifically designed for the Haor Area
titled ‘Haor Flood Management and Livelihood Improvement Project’51. The programme is being
implemented by the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR).
Initiated in 2018, this development programme is being had funded by JICA. The expected completion date
is June 2022. Allocated budget during 2019-20 is TK. 552 crores, making it a medium-sized programme. The
overall objective of the project is to reduce the damages of Boro crops from pre-monsoon flood, improve
access to basic infrastructure, and increase agriculture and fishery productivity in the hoar areas in the upper
Meghna river basin by (i) rehabilitating and constructing the flood management facilities; (ii) rehabilitating
and constructing the rural infrastructures; and (iii) implementing agriculture and fishery promotion activities,
and thereby contributing to the improvement of living standard and activation of economic activities in the
target area.
Figure 6.39: Flood Management and Livelihood Figure 6.40: Char Development and Settlement
Improvement Project in Haor Area 50 300
600 45
40 250
35 200
500 30
25 150
400 20
15 100
300 10 50
5
200 0 0
100
0
FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20 Beneficiary Budget
Budget
Figure 6.41: Special Assistance for the development of Char, Haor and undevelopment area
1 250
0.8 200
0.6 150
0.4 100
0.2 50
0 0
FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20
Beneficiary Budget
• Rehabilitation of landless destitute poor families affected by climate change, river erosion and other
natural disasters by establishing Guchhagrams on government “khash” land
• Bring them to mainstream society by ensuring socio-economic development by providing credit and
giving training on awareness and skill development.
(ii) Coastal Climate Resilient Infrastructure Improvement Programme (CCRIIP) is being implemented by
LGD, MoLGRDC. CCRIIP constructs climate-resilient road infrastructure and cyclone shelters, and improves
access to markets to address acute poverty and climatic vulnerability in south-west Bangladesh.52 The project
is being implemented in 32 Upazilas of 12 south-western districts - Barguna, Barisal, Bhola, Jhalokathi,
Patuakhali, and Pirojpur districts in Barisal division, Gopalganj, Madaripur and Shariatpur districts in Dhaka
division, Bagerhat, Khulna, and Satkhira districts in Khulna Division. These districts are known to be very
poor, least developed, and vulnerable to natural disasters such as tidal surges, cyclones, and floods. The
target group comprises the population in the catchment areas of project markets and roads, in particular,
small and marginal farmers, small traders and microentrepreneurs, landless people, and poor women. It is
estimated that 3.5 million people will benefit from the project. The number of beneficiaries on average per
year has been around 48 thousand during 2014-2019. In 2019-20 the allocated budget for this programme
was TK. 156 crore.
Case 10: Case study on a Beneficiary of the Coastal Climate Resilient Infrastructure
Improvement Programme
Nurul Amin Shekh, a shrimp farmer from Sundarganj, has been struggling to support his family with his limited monthly
earning of Tk. 15,000 from his hatchery. He incurs big losses when his shrimps suffer from viral diseases and consequently
has to take loans to support his family.
For the last four years, he has been receiving training on Coastal Climate Resilient Infrastructure Improvement
Programme. It has been helping his family and other villagers to survive the loss of property after deleterious weather.
He and most of the villagers are involved with the programme. According to him, the most important training is on getting
shelter for different storm signals. Other than training, the CCRIIP also provides lifejackets, torches, raincoats etc.
“We got nothing but awareness training from the CCRIIP. It does not provide any kind of financial supports for livelihood
improvements”, he said with a bit of frustration. He wished that CCRIIP were allotted funds to incorporate workfare
programme components (such as repairing roads or improving other infrastructures) so that the poor people could earn
from the programme as well. He also thinks that the government should provide financial support or loan along with
training. It should also incorporate a monitoring component to gauge the progress. He believes that training on livestock
breeding and the provision of financial support for poor old women would result in an increase in income.
(iii) Lump-Sum Provision for Development of Special Areas (Except Hill Tracts), a revenue financed
programme, has been administered by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). The target beneficiaries of this
programme are marginalised rural population. This programme was initiated in 1996 targeting the
marginalised rural population of Bangladesh. Around 14 thousand beneficiaries have benefitted from this
programme on average per year during 2014-2019. In 2019-20, the allocated budget for this programme was
been Tk. 50 crore. Objectives and activities conducted in the domain of this programme are as follows:
• Improving income generation opportunities for the rural marginalised group of the population, that
include providing skills and training.
• Providing school stipends in the concerned Upazilas and one-time stipends for public and private
university students from the rural-marginalised group.
• Funds from this programme are also spent on health services, repairing religious structures, and
establishing schools for a marginal group of population.
Figure 6.42: Coastal Climate Resilient Figure 6.43: Gucchagram (Climate Victims
Infrastructure Improvement Rehabilitation)
0.6 350 4 500
3.5 450
0.5 300
400
250 3
0.4 350
2.5 300
200
0.3 2 250
150 200
1.5
0.2 150
100 1
0.1 100
50 0.5 50
0 0 0 0
0.2 50
40
0.15
30
0.1
20
0.05 10
0 0
FY2013- FY2014- FY2015- FY2016- FY2017- FY2018- FY2019-
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Beneficiary Budget
Coastal Climate LGD, MoLGRDC 32 Upazilas of Improved livelihoods (higher income and - The programme has
Resilient 12 south- food security) for poor households some similar
Infrastructure western (women and men) in selected Upazilas of objectives as
Improvement districts: 12 coastal districts. observed in the
Barguna, The development objective is to achieve Agriculture
Barisal, Bhola, enhanced climate resilience of the Infrastructure
Jhalokathi, coastal road and market infrastructure Improvement
Patuakhali and and people in selected Upazilas of 12 project. Most of the
Pirojpur. project districts. areas under
Districts in operation of these
Barisal two programmes are
Division, also overlapping.
Gopalganj,
The objective of the stipend programme for the students with disabilities (SWD) is to provide support to their
families so that SWDs can continue their education. The programme is being implemented by the
Department of Social Services under the MoSW. As benefits, a student receives Tk. 300 per month in primary
school, Tk. 450 in secondary school (class VI-X), Tk. 600 per month at college (XI-XII), and Tk. 1000 per month
at the university level (graduation and above In addition, this year, the number of recipients
of stipends for disabled students is going to be increased to one lakh from 90,000 and the rate of
the stipends increased from Tk 700 to Tk 750 for primary students, from Tk 750 to Tk 800 for
secondary students, and from Tk 850 to Tk 900 for higher secondary students.
Disability service and assistance centre: The Disability Service and Assistance Centre is operated by the
Jatiya Protibondhi Unnoyon Foundation (JPUF) under the MoSW. The foundation operates through 103
centres in 64 districts. It plans to establish disability service and assistance centre in each of the Upazilas
where autism corner, toy library, etc. will be integrated. Through these centres, the foundation provides
services such as physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, etc at free. It also
provides counselling and information services.
The objective of the Neuro-Developmental Disabilities Protection Trust (NDPT) 53 includes – (a) providing
physical, mental and financial support to the persons with neurodevelopmental disabilities (PND); (b)
providing education, and (c) empowering them in the society. As a part of the programme, it also provides
counselling services to the parents, detection facilities of the neurodevelopmental disability (NDD),
treatment costs for NDD, awareness building, etc. It is noteworthy that the NDPT identifies the types of
neurodevelopmental disabilities as follows:
Figure 6.45: Service and Assistance Centre for Figure 6.46: Grants for the Schools for the
Disabled Disabled
4 70.0 30.0 0.40
3.5 60.0 0.35
3 25.0
50.0
2.5 0.30
40.0 20.0
2 0.25
30.0
1.5
20.0 15.0 0.20
1
0.5 10.0 0.15
10.0
0 0.0 0.10
5.0
0.05
- -
Welfare Trust for Physical Disabilities (also known as the Sharirik Protibondhi Surokkha Trust) is operated
through the MoSW. The trust fund operates an industrial plant called Moitri Shilpa where persons with
disabilities are employed. The plant produces drinking water bottles which is used as official bottled water
for the National Parliament, PMO, all government offices, and as well as autonomous institutes. The plant
also produces various types of plastic goods such as jugs, mugs, buckets, etc. The trust provides scholarships
to 128 students with disabilities each year. 54
Figure 6.47: Welfare Trust for Persons with Figure 6.48: Trust for the protection of the
Physical disabilities persons with neurodevelopmental disabilities
16 30
14
25
12
10 20
8 15
6
10
4
2 5
0 0
Social Development Foundation is an autonomous and ‘not-for-profit’ organisation under the Ministry of
Finance, Government of Bangladesh established in 2000. Being an organisation itself, the SDF cannot be
considered for programme consolidation. However, during the desk research, it was identified that some of
the SDF programmes (which are not reported on the MoF prepared list) had identical or overlapping
components with other SSP projects. One of the prime examples of such project is the Notun Jibon Livelihood
Improvement Project (NJLIP) which is currently being implemented with assistance from the World Bank.
The project is a continuation and extended version of its previous Social Investment Programme Project-II
(SIPP). The project areas cover 35 poorest Upazilas identified in the HIES 2010. The $220 million project
started in 2015 and will continue till June 2021. This project has three major components, namely – (i)
Community institutions and livelihood development, (ii) Business development and institutional
strengthening, and (iii) Project management, monitoring, and learning. Through these components, the
project aims to attain its objectives such as
It is observed that several of the programme components have unique features. The GoB needs to
synchronise all such poverty reduction strategy programmes, such as SWAPNO, NJLIP, HILIP, AIDP, etc. into
a larger programme with stronger integration to the other social security components (such as training
programmes, microcredits, etc.).
Based on our above discussion of all the small social security programmes of Bangladesh it is clear that a
complete harmonisation of the small programmes is not possible unless and otherwise broad large
programmes are well defined and classified. As mentioned in the NSSS, there should be five broad
programmes for(i) the children;(ii) working age population, (iii)the elderly, (iv)PWDs, and (v) abroad set of
special programmes. These five programmes should be considered as five umbrella programmes and all
other programmes for the SSPs should be considered as components of these programmes. If any new
programme needs to be introduced, it should be a complementary programme to one or more components
of the existing umbrella programme and not as a substitute. Therefore, for a successful consolidation, a
seven-layer implementation strategy presented in Figure 6.49 can be considered:
Regular M&E
Phased
implementation
Communication and
dissemination
Gap identification
Stakeholder identification
Impact analysis
Planning
As has been noted during the consultations with the ministries, there is a lack of clarity in understanding the
concept of programme harmonisation. Therefore, thorough planning should be undertaken regarding
programme consolidation so that each ministry can pinpoint their prospective roles and stakes in it. In this
regard, as mentioned in the NSSS, based on the life-cycle categories some key umbrella programmes should
be defined. The GED should conduct a study on each of the components of the lifecycle category so that the
studies can prepare a guideline for each component. That is, there should be five broad studies,
a. A study on Child Benefit Programme (0-18): the study should identify the elements to capture in the
programme, it’s operational modality, what components the programme should have, and how the
programme should evolve over time.
b. A study on the Workfare Programme: based on a review of all existing workfare programmes, the
study should identify an ideal framework for a workfare programme.
c. A study on the programme for the elderly: the study should identify what should be included in the
programme
d. A study on the programmes for the PWDs: although the NSSS stipulated for a detailed study on the
framework for the Disability Benefits programme for the children and working-age population – the
framework has not been set yet. The study should identify what type of programmes should be
considered for PWDs.
e. A study on the special programmes: Should there be need for any special programme, the GED
should set the guideline for those programmes.
Layer 2: Analysing the Impacts and identifying the dependencies
All the aforementioned six studies should particularly identify the potential impacts and outline the
dependencies. For instance, phasing out many programmes will result in laying off thousands of people. How
should such challenges be addressed?
All the relevant stakeholders implementing the small programmes, programme beneficiaries, as well as
donors should be identified. The small programmes/other programmes consolidation to the broadly defined
large six programmes must be well defined.
Based on the consultation with the stakeholders, all the gaps in the drafted six mother programmes should
be identified.
The final consolidation programme should be well disseminated so that each of the stakeholders knows
about the framework. This will help reduce emerging new small SSPs. Donors and development partners will
be well informed about their scopes of intervention in the newly drafted broad programmes.
Considering the fact that the NSSS’s second phase will be in place by 2025, all the components of the large
programmes should be in place by 2025 and be implemented in a phased manner.
The overall consolidation approach should be regularly monitored and evaluated by a competent third party
procured by the GED. With support from the Cabinet Division, the M&E implementor’s sole assignment
would be to monitor the overall progress of the small programme harmonisation according to the phases
identified in the studies.
Nonetheless, a more specific programme-wise recommendation for small programme harmonisation has
been summarised in the following Recommendation section.
This study finds that several small social security programmes have overlapping objectives. Consolidation of
these programmes thus can significantly improve the efficiency of current social security schemes in
Bangladesh. Taking a close look at various features of small SSPs e.g. programme objectives, number of
beneficiaries, eligibility as social security and their scale of operation, this study develops a framework to
harmonise small SSPs. Both specific and broad recommendations are presented regarding the harmonization
of small social security programmes.
56 A COMPENDIUM
The project document is available at: [Link] OF SOCIALPROTECTION
accessed on 6 October 2019. RESEARCHES
Harmonisation of Small Social Security Programmes: Issues and Policy Options 408
uniforms. Exam fees should be abolished for the poor students. On the other hand, pre-vocational
training components of the ROSC should be integrated into the Technical and Vocational Education
curricula.
Small child protection programmes such as ‘Child protection and child welfare’ and ‘Street children
rehabilitation programmes’ have several components that are implemented by the DSS through the
Child Sensitive Social Protection in Bangladesh (CSSB) programme. Hence, rather being administered
as separate programmes, these schemes can be incorporated in the (CSSB).
Small SSP for the skill development of working-age population include Skill and Employment
Programme in Bangladesh (SEP-B), whose unique components can be integrated into a broader
medium-sized programme named Skills for Employment Investment Programme (SEIP), upon its
completion in 2020. SEIP should be strengthened and should be integrated with other Income
Generating Activities (IGA) based- social protection programmes.
An overview of the skill enhancement programmes for women run by DWA and JMS indicates a
duplicated number of programme components. Such duplicities in the training programmes can
result in inefficiencies. According to some social security experts interviewed for this project, such
duplicities can result in the hiring of inexperienced/incapable trainers reducing the overall impacts
of training. These programmes can also be considered for integration with the MoF led SEIP
programme. It should be noted that both SEIP and MoWCA initiated skill-enhancing programmes
will phase out with the completion of the project deadline. However, most of these projects are
continuation (that is, 2nd or 3rd phase) of earlier programmes. Therefore, it can be expected that –
many of these programmes might get a further extension if proper harmonisation does not take
place. The research team recommends harmonising all such skill-enhancing programmes around
SEIP. If required – remodify the module of SEIP so that the social empowerment component (such
as self-employing tools – sewing, embroidery, etc.) are well resonated.
through the DSS and the stipend programme for the PWDs should be harmonised with the regular
benefit programmes.
Street Children Rehabilitation is also implemented through the MoSW. The project components of
the street children programme are already included in the CSSB project. Rather being implemented
as a separate programme; this can be incorporated in the CSSB programme.
Two approaches can be undertaken for the harmonization of ‘Assistance for Cancer, Kidney and Liver
Cirrhosis Patients’. The first approach could be merging it with the modified GR programme. Any
person diagnosed with the medical condition and verified by a certified doctor as well as UNO/DC
will be entitled to receive the benefit. And the second approach could be integrating this programme
with the MoHFW run ‘T.B. Leprosy, Communicable Non-communicable Disease control’ programme
(which is a large programme with a budget of Tk 750 crore). The modified programme will
incorporate subsidised treatment costs for persons diagnosed with cancer, kidney or liver cirrhosis
at the government hospitals.
The region-specific programmes namely Haor Flood Management and Livelihood Improvement
Project, Char Development and Settlement programme, and Special Assistance for the development
of Char, Haor and underdeveloped areas all have similar objectives as one of the major programmes,
‘Haor Infrastructure and livelihood Development programme’. Hence, these programmes can be
administered through the same authority. Likewise, other region-specific special programmes that
address climate change issues and vulnerability of coastal areas such as Gucchagram and Coastal
Climate Resilient Infrastructure Improvement can be harmonized if there are improved coordination
between the implementing authorities MoL and MoLGRDC.
1. Small programme harmonization will improve administrative efficiency without much impact on
budgetary efficiency
As has been discussed before, the small social security programmes constitute only 4.13% of the total SSP
budget. In addition, some of the small programmes are too small to have any major impact whether they
are consolidated or are left to exist as they are. Hence, in terms of budgetary efficiency harmonization of
small programmes might not induce significant benefit over the current situation. However, our analysis of
small SSPs implies severe overlaps among several small programmes in terms of objectives, and some
programmes are too small to have any meaningful impact on the beneficiaries. Due to the duplicity,
programmes that are similar in goals can be consolidated to improve administration and management
efficiency by reducing the administrative cost of operation, as envisaged in the NSSS. Also, the programmes
that are aligned with the goals of major or large SSPs, can be brought under the same umbrella.
Given this scenario, this study believes, even though there will be a substantial gain in administrative
efficiency from consolidation and harmonization of small SSPs, that most budgetary gains from programme
harmonisation will come from consolidation of large programmes.
3. Programme consolidation can use a cluster approach to bring group-specific interventions under
one umbrella
In certain cases, several special small programmes have their relevance and usefulness to address pressing
issues that involve insolvent marginal groups of the population. This is particularly important when the issue
of inclusivity has to be protected and promoted. For example, the programme targeting certain marginal
groups as "Bede" and transgender population. One will also have to accommodate political commitments
(e.g. to protect certain communities). Programme consolidation can use a cluster approach so that all these
group-specific interventions can be brought under an umbrella for programme designs, ensuring coherence
across the similar schemes and effective administrative oversight.
5. Steps should be taken to make all SSP related information easily available through a dedicated
web portal
One of the major limitations the research team faced while working on this project, was the unavailability of
information on several social security programmes. This dearth of available information hinders in
conducting a rigorous analysis of the small programme harmonization based on programme efficiency. In
order to address this issue, all ministries and divisions should make the SSP related information easily
available through their website. However, a dedicated web portal registering all information of the SSPs can
be the most effective way of disseminating information on social security programmes in Bangladesh. This
must be noted that, there is already a dedicated web portal for the social protection programmes in
Bangladesh.57 However, the website does not provide an updated information for all the programmes.
Annex
Table 6.13: Programmes under the Revenue budget
Sl. Name of Program Coverage (Persons in lac/Man Budget (Taka in crore) Program. Program. Type Remarks
No. Month) Size
2018-19 2018-19 2019-20 2018-19 2018-19 2019-20
(rev.) (rev.)
1 Old Age Allowance 40.00 40.00 44.00 2400.00 2400.00 2640.00 Large Social Protection Large programme; stipulated
in the NSSS
2 Allowances for the 14.00 14.00 17.00 840.00 840.00 1020.00 Large Social Protection Large programme; stipulated
Widow, Deserted and in the NSSS
Destitute Women
3 Allowances for the 10.00 10.00 15.45 840.00 840.00 1390.50 Large Social Protection Large programme; stipulated
Financially Insolvent in the NSSS
Disabled
4 Assistance for Cancer, 0.15 0.15 0.30 75.00 75.00 150.00 Small Social Protection Small programme; potential
Kidney, Liver candidate for harmonisation
Cirrhosis and other
Patients
5 Programme for 0.40 0.40 0.50 20.00 20.00 25.00 Small Social Protection Small programme; potential
Livelihood candidate for harmonisation
Improvement of tea-
garden labourers
6 Grants for Residents 0.21 0.21 0.21 54.66 54.66 63.63 Small Social Protection This is a grant; consolidation
in Government might not be an appropriate
Orphanages and strategy.
Other Institutions
7 Capitation Grants for 0.86 0.88 1.00 103.68 105.00 120.00 Small Social Protection This is a grant; consolidation
Orphan Students in might not be an appropriate
Non-gov. Orphanages strategy.
8 Maternity Allowance 7.00 7.00 7.70 693.00 694.02 763.27 Large Social Protection Large programme; The NSSS
Programme for the stipulates for consolidation of
Poor Lactating this programme with the
Mothers 'Allowances for Urban
Lactating Mothers'
programme. The programme
is now being consolidated
into 'Agamir Shishu'
programme
9 Allowances for Urban 2.50 2.50 2.75 248.50 248.88 273.11 Small Social Protection Large programme; The NSSS
Lactating Mothers stipulates for consolidation of
this programme with the
'Maternity Allowance
Programme'. The programme
is now being consolidated
into 'Agamir Shishu'
programme.
10 Honorarium for 2.00 2.00 2.00 3305.00 2996.15 3385.05 Large Social Protection Large programme; Special
Freedom Fighters Programme
11 Honorarium & 0.15 0.15 0.15 295.07 415.05 480.15 Medium Social Protection Special Programme; cannot
Medical Allowances be consolidated
for Injured Freedom
Fighters
12 Ration for Shaheed 0.30 0.30 0.30 33.50 33.50 51.00 Small Social Protection Special Programme; cannot
Family and Injured be consolidated
Freedom Fighters
13 Block Allocation for 17.64 13.09 14.73 291.00 220.84 242.95 Small Social Protection Special allocation; cannot be
Disaster Management consolidated
14 General Relief 0.00 0.00 0.00 470.00 210.00 369.64 Small Social Protection Special allocation; cannot be
Activities (Block) consolidated
15 Non-Bengali 0.15 0.15 0.15 10.00 10.00 10.00 Small Social Protection Special allocation; cannot be
Rehabilitation consolidated
16 Varieties Relief Works 0.00 0.00 0.00 81.00 81.00 Small Social Protection Special allocation; cannot be
consolidated
17 Pension for Retired 6.30 6.30 6.30 22639.4 22449.4 23010.0 Large Social Protection Special programme; cannot
Government 6 6 0 be consolidated
Employees and their
Families
18 Stipend for Disabled 0.90 0.90 100.00 80.37 80.37 95.64 Small Social Cannot be consolidated; but
Students Empowerment harmonisation is possible
19 Grants for the 0.35 0.35 0.35 23.00 25.00 28.00 Small Social Cannot be consolidated;
Schools for the Empowerment
Disabled
20 Housing Support 2.96 2.96 2.96 25.00 25.00 25.00 Small Cash Transfer Cannot be consolidated;
(Special)
Programme
21 National Legal Aid 0.62 0.69 0.81 15.77 17.50 20.50 Small Cash Transfer Cannot be consolidated;
(Special)
Programme
22 Special Assistance for 0.90 0.90 0.23 200.00 200.00 50.00 Small Cash Transfer Cannot be consolidated; but
the development of (Special) harmonisation is possible
Char, Haor and Programme
undeveloped area
23 Agriculture 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 Small Cash Transfer Cannot be consolidated
Rehabilitation (Special)
Programme
24 Open Market Sales 78.33 70.06 89.39 832.00 744.21 949.52 Large Food Security Cannot be consolidated
(OMS) Programmes:
Social Protection
25 Vulnerable Group 142.47 139.81 142.47 1685.07 1656.45 1698.91 Large Food Security NSSS stipulated programme.
Development (VGD) Programmes: NSSS envisaged to
Social Protection consolidate this programme
to Vulnerable Women Benefit
(VWB) programme.
26 Vulnerable Group 64.72 70.71 83.41 1730.81 1892.16 1956.91 Large Food Security
Feeding (VGF) Programmes:
Social Protection
27 Gratuitous Relief 56.82 56.82 56.82 540.88 541.74 543.59 Medium Food Security Cannot be consolidated
(Food) Programmes:
Social Protection
28 Food Assistance in 7.76 8.42 8.55 282.82 306.76 311.57 Small Food Security Cannot be consolidated
CTG-Hill Tracts Area Programmes:
Social Protection
29 Food For Work (FFW) 11.01 10.75 17.14 987.58 964.68 1204.08 Large Food Security Cannot be consolidated
Programmes:
Social Protection
30 Work For Money 15.18 15.18 15.81 720.00 720.00 750.00 Large Food Security Cannot be consolidated
(WFM) Programmes:
Social Protection
31 Test Relief (TR) Cash 19.06 19.06 20.98 1390.00 1390.00 1530.00 Large Food Security Cannot be consolidated
Programmes:
Social Protection
32 Employment 8.27 8.27 8.27 1650.00 1650.00 1650.00 Large Food Security Large programme. Requires
Generation Programmes: harmonisation with similar
Programme for the Social Protection smaller programmes
Poor
33 Food friendly 0.50 0.50 0.50 638.00 638.00 2624.00 Large Food Security Cannot be consolidated
Program Programmes:
Social Protection
34 Food Subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.00 1250.11 1310.17 Large Food Security Cannot be consolidated
Programmes:
Social Protection
35 Micro-credit for 0.28 0.28 0.34 5.00 5.00 6.00 Small Micro-Credit Cannot be consolidated:
Women Self- Programmes: requires programme
employment Social harmonisation with similar
Empowerment programmes
36 Micro-Credit through 79.37 79.37 268.56 232.00 232.00 785.00 Large Micro-Credit Cannot be consolidated:
PKSF Programmes: requires programme
Social harmonisation with similar
Empowerment programmes
37 Interest Free Micro- 0.27 0.21 0.29 55.00 41.00 58.00 Small Micro-Credit Cannot be consolidated:
Credit Programme Programmes: requires programme
Social harmonisation with similar
Empowerment programmes
38 Social Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 425.00 400.00 235.00 Small Micro-Credit Cannot be consolidated:
Foundation Programmes: requires programme
Social harmonisation with similar
Empowerment programmes
39 Fund for the Welfare 0.30 0.30 0.33 1.50 1.50 1.65 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
of Burnt and Disabled Funds: Social requires programme
Empowerment harmonisation with similar
programmes
40 Trust for the 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.50 25.50 27.50 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
protection of the Funds: Social requires programme
persons with Empowerment harmonisation with similar
neurodevelopmental programmes
disabilities.
41 Welfare Trust for 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 11.50 15.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Physical Disabilities. Funds: Social requires programme
Empowerment harmonisation with similar
programmes
42 National Shamaj 0.68 0.68 0.79 60.00 60.00 70.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated;
Kallyan Parishad Funds: Social
Empowerment
43 Joyeeta Foundation 0.10 0.10 0.10 2.40 2.40 3.30 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated;
Funds: Social
Empowerment
44 Special Fund for 0.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 106.35 125.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Assistance to women Funds: Social requires programme
development & Empowerment harmonisation with similar
entrepreneurs programmes
45 Oppressed Women 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 50.00 50.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
and Children Funds: Social requires programme
Welfare Fund Empowerment harmonisation with similar
programmes
46 Fund for Assistance to 1.00 1.00 1.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
the Small Farmer and Funds: Social requires programme
Poultry Farms Empowerment harmonisation with similar
programmes
47 Skill Development 0.17 0.17 0.17 401.90 400.00 400.00 Medium Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated;
and Earthquake Risk Funds: Social
Management Fund Empowerment
48 Service and 3.76 3.76 3.76 65.00 62.93 65.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Assistance Centre for Funds: Social requires programme
Disabled Protection harmonisation with similar
programmes
49 Programme for 0.62 0.62 0.81 50.03 50.03 67.10 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Improving the Funds: Social requires programme
Livelihood of Bede & Protection harmonisation with similar
disadvantaged programmes
community
50 Rehabilitation and ০.০৬ ০.০৬ ০.০৮ 3.00 3.00 4.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Generation of Funds: Social requires programme
Alternative Protection harmonisation with similar
Employment for programmes
Beggars Profession
51 Programme for ০.০৬ ০.০৬ ০.০৬ 11.40 11.40 5.56 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Improving the Funds: Social requires programme
Livelihood of Protection harmonisation with similar
Transgender (Hijra) programmes
52 Women's Skill Based 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.80 6.80 6.80 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Training For Funds: Social requires programme
Livelihood Protection harmonisation with similar
programmes
53 Child Development 0.03 0.03 0.03 5.80 5.80 6.30 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Centre Funds: Social requires programme
Protection
54 Street Children ০.০২ 0.02 0.02 4.00 3.70 4.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated:
Rehabilitation Funds: Social requires programme
Programme Protection harmonisation with similar
programmes
55 Fund for Climate 4.50 4.50 4.50 276.97 300.00 300.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated;
Change Funds: Social
Protection
56 National Service 1.49 1.49 1.52 669.60 669.60 681.91 Medium Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated;
Funds: Social
Protection
57 Pension Insurance 0.02 0.02 0.02 12.00 12.00 12.00 Small Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated;
Scheme Funds: Social
Protection
58 Block Allocation for 0.09 0.08 0.40 327.15 299.00 1463.00 Large Miscellaneous Cannot be consolidated;
Various Programme Funds: Social
Protection
Total Revenue 53435.3
Budget 1
Total SSP budget 74363.6
4
Revenue Budget (as 71.9
% of total)
10 * Maternal, 697.95 656.32 697.95 987.60 781.97 928.69 Large Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Neonatal, Child Programmes: Social option
and Empowerment
Adolescent
Health
11 *Essential 1383.16 1340.00 1383.16 1001.90 989.23 987.53 Large Development Sector Large Programme
Service Delivery Programmes: Social
& Community Empowerment
Based Health
Care
12 * National 900 661.98 900 121 89 96 Small Development Sector Small programme.
Nutrition Programmes: Social Harmonisation can be an
Services Empowerment option.
13 * Maternal, 615.92 654.02 746.09 194.00 206.00 235 Small Development Sector Small programme.
Child, Programmes: Social Harmonisation can be an
Reproductive Empowerment option.
and
Adolescent
Health
14 *Clinical 34.61 37.71 34.61 311.53 339.45 286.08 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Contraception Programmes: Social option
Services Delivery Empowerment
15 * Family Planning 321.28 306.57 330.96 300.93 287.15 310 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Field Services Programmes: Social option
Delivery Empowerment
16 T.B., Leprosy, 3029.25 1442.15 3029.25 859.97 409.41 752.83 Large Development Sector No harmonisation
Communicable Programmes: Social required.
and Non- Empowerment
communicable
Disease Control
17 Establishment of 0.08 0.12 0.00 28.66 41.95 0 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Hostel for Programmes: Social required.
Government Empowerment
Shishu Paribar
and the Visually
Impaired
Children
18 Early Learning 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 10.50 19.63 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
for Child Programmes: Social option
Development Empowerment
19 Northern Area 0.02 0.02 0.00 20.90 20.90 0 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Reduction of Programmes: Social required.
Poverty Empowerment
Initiative
20 Grameen 0.00 0.00 0.00 3242.00 2081.71 4125.53 Large Development Sector No harmonisation
Infrastructure Programmes: Social required.
Development Empowerment
22 Infrastructure 0.32 0.16 1.85 150.00 75.00 867.73 Large Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
and Livelihood Programmes: Social option
Development in Empowerment
Haor Area
23 Coastal Climate 0.50 0.34 0.27 282.96 190.00 155.5 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Resilient Programmes: Social option
Infrastructure Empowerment
Improvement
24 Child protection 0 0 0 91.56 94.39 189.39 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
and child welfare Programmes: Social option
Empowerment
25 Agriculture 0.69 0.69 0.85 33.10 33.10 40.85 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Infrastructure Programmes: Social option
Improvement Empowerment
26 Construction of 0.50 0.38 0.58 60.00 45.50 70 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Colony for the Programmes: Social required.
Cleaners of Empowerment
Dhaka City
Corporation
27 Participatory 8.00 4.56 0.00 29.80 17.00 0 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Small-Scale Programmes: Social required.
Water Empowerment
Resource
Development
28 Construction of 2.00 0.25 2.59 119.91 15.00 155.12 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Flood Shelter in Programmes: Social required.
the Empowerment
Flood and River
Erosion Prone
Area -
29 Development of 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.83 20.05 182.7 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
the Living Programmes: Social option
Standard of the Empowerment
Marginal People
of Bangladesh
30 Bangladesh Rural 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 200 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Water Supply Programmes: Social required.
and Empowerment
Sanitation
32 Flood 0.00 0.00 0.00 410.00 324.00 552.23 Medium Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Management Programmes: Social option
and Livelihood Empowerment
Improvement
Project in Haor
Area
33 Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 1126.91 2756.75 961.99 Large Development Sector No harmonisation
Support for Programmes: Social required.
Special Needs Empowerment
34 Char 1 0.24 10.18 22.29 27.27 227 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Development Programmes: Social option
and Settlement Empowerment
35 "Gucchagram” 1.19 1.19 1.28 152.46 152.46 164.56 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
(Climate Victims Programmes: Social option
Rehabilitation) Empowerment
36 Second 6.02 4.89 5.27 80.00 65.00 70 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Chittagong Hill Programmes: Social required.
Tracts Rural Empowerment
Development
37 Tottho Apa: 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.84 88.56 130 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Empowering Programmes: Social option
Women Empowerment
Through ICT
Towards Digital
Bangladesh
38 Establishment of 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 6.96 60 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Autistic Academy Programmes: Social required.
in Empowerment
Bangladesh
39 Skills for 2.60 2.13 2.34 481.64 394.00 433.2 Medium Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Employment Programmes: Social option
Investment Empowerment
Program
42 Income Support 6.00 1.14 10.81 432.02 81.96 778.1 Large Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Program for the Programmes: Social option
Poorest Empowerment
43 Skills for 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 0 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Employment and Programmes: Social option
Productivity Empowerment
44 Construction of 1.00 0.34 0.34 621.30 210.00 210 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
the Multiple Programmes: Social required.
DisasterShelters Empowerment
45 Livelihood of 0.01 0.01 0.01 50.80 25.40 25.4 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Grameen People Programmes: Social required.
"Rural Empowerment
Community"
Building
46 Program for 0.07 0.07 0.06 23.28 23.28 18.74 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Ensuring Programmes: Social option
Employment for Empowerment
the Ultra Poor in
Northern area
47 Poverty 0.04 0.04 0.04 49.45 49.45 49.45 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Reduction Programmes: Social required.
Through Empowerment
Inclusive and
Sustainable
Markets
48 Social Security 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.89 8.92 3.35 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Policy Support Programmes: Social required.
(SSPS) Empowerment
Programme
49 Strengthening 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.30 17.08 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Public Financial Programmes: Social required.
Management for Empowerment
Social Protection
50 Skill and 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.42 39.24 371.54 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Employment Programmes: Social option
Programme in Empowerment
Bangladesh
51 Increase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.00 43 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Productivity and Programmes: Social option
Opportunity for Empowerment
employment. for
Women
(SWAPNO)
52 Support to the 0.78 0.78 1.13 38.95 38.95 56.36 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Urban Health Programmes: Social option
and Empowerment
Nutrition to the
Urban
Bangladesh
53 Skill and Training 0 0 0 430 456 0 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Enhancement Programmes: Social option
Empowerment
54 Urban Based 0.53 0.53 0.53 19.60 19.75 20.64 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Women Programmes: Social option
Development Empowerment
Project (Phase-2)
55 Establishment of 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.74 12.72 11.74 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
20 Child Day-care Programmes: Social option
Centre Project Empowerment
56 Income 0.20 0.30 0.30 61.16 92.96 90.72 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Generating Programmes: Social option
Activities (IGA) Empowerment
for
Women at
Upazila Level
57 Multi-Sectoral 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.54 21.00 27.38 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Programme to Programmes: Social required.
Prevent Empowerment
on Violence
Against Women
(4th Phase)
58 Amader Bari (Our 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.14 10.08 0 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Home): Programmes: Social required.
Integrated Empowerment
Old and Children
Home
59 Improved life 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 23.60 42.2 Small Development Sector Harmonisation can be an
Standard for low- Programmes: Social option
income people Empowerment
60 Construction of 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.06 3.06 1 Small Development Sector No harmonisation
Vocational Programmes: Social required.
Training and Empowerment
Rehabilitation
Centre for the
Disable at CRP,
Manikganj
Total 18539.80
Development
Budget
Total SSP budget 74363.64
Budget % 24.9
Table 6.15: Programmes under the New Development Budget (as referred to in the MoF budget document)
Sl. Name of Programme Coverage (Persons in Budget (Taka in crore) Program Programme Type Remarks
No lac/Man Month) me Size
. 2018-19 2018- 2019-20 2018-19 2018-19 2019-20
19 (rev.)
(rev.)
1 Urban Public Environmental 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111.67 103.8 Small New No Harmonisation
Health Development required
Centre Development Program Projects/Programs
2 Urban Resilience Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 412.81 627.05 Medium New No Harmonisation
(DNCC & DDM) Development required
Projects/Programs
3 The sustainable socio-economic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.01 2.37 Small New Harmonisation can
development and rehabilitation Development be an option.
programs of underprivileged and Projects/Programs
poor disabled and autistic people
through special education, health
care and various training
programs
8 Capacity Building of Joyeeta 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.17 51.77 Small New No Harmonisation
Foundation Development required
& Construction of Joyeeta Tower Projects/Programs
9 Promoting Nutrition Sensitive 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.38 6.32 Small New Harmonisation can
SocialSecurity & Policy Support Development be an option.
Program Projects/Programs
10 'Development of Haji Nowab Ali 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 Small New No Harmonisation
Khan Development required
Orphanage' Projects/Programs
11 Rural Infrastructure Development 0 0 0 0 0 419.64 Medium New Harmonisation can
Development be an option.
Projects/Programs
12 Secondary Education 0 0 44.52 0 0 1000 Large New No Harmonisation
Development Development required
Programme (S.E.D.P) Projects/Programs
13 Construction of Multi-storied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 Small New No Harmonisation
Building for under privileged Development required
Muktijoddha at Zilla / Upazila Projects/Programs
Total New Development Budget 2391.82
References
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Preliminary Report on Household Income and Expenditure Survey
2016.
Cecchini, S. and Martínez, R., 2013. Social protection in Latin America in the new millennium.
De Neve, J.W., Boudreaux, C., Gill, R., Geldsetzer, P., Vaikath, M., Bärnighausen, T. and Bossert, T.J., 2017.
Harmonizing community-based health worker programs for HIV: a narrative review and analytic
framework. Human resources for health, 15(1), p.45.
Fox, W.F. and Gurley, T., 2006. Will consolidation improve sub-national governments?. The World Bank.
Government of Bangladesh (GoB). (2015). National Social Security Strategy (NSSS) of Bangladesh, (July), 1–99.
Retrieved from [Link]
Hasan, M. K. (2017). “A B C D of Social Protection in Bangladesh”. Cabinet Division and General Economics
Division, Government of Bangladesh. Retrieved on 28 November 2018 from
[Link]
Hossain, M. I., 2017. Social Protection Strategies to Address Idiosyncratic and Covariate Risks and Shocks,
including Seasonal Poverty, Economic Recession and Natural Disasters. Exploring the Evidence:
Background Research Papers for Preparing the National Social Security Strategy of Bangladesh. Dhaka
: GED, Planning Commission, p. 166.
Hossain, M. R. & Rahman, A., 2017. State of Governance within Social Protection Sector in Bangladesh.
Exploring the Evidence: Background Research Papers for Preparing the National Social Security
Strategy of Bangladesh. Dhaka: GED, Planning Commission, Government of the People's Republic of
Bangladesh, pp. 179-196.
[Link]
ISPA. (2012). Core Diagnostic Instrument Tool.
ISPA. (n.d.). Social Protection Payment Delivery Mechanisms - “What Matters” Guidance Note Payment.
ISPA. (n.d.). Social Protection Public Works - “WHAT MATTERS” GUIDANCE NOTE.
Jaccoud, L., Hadjab, P.D.E.M. and Chaibub, J.R., 2010. The consolidation of social assistance in Brazil and its
challenges, 1988-2008 (No. 76). Working Paper, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
Khan, T., Hasan M. M. 2016. ‘Social protection system in Bangladesh and the scope of social work: learning
from lessons on the ground’. MPRA Paper No. 70949, [Link]
Khuda, B. E., 2011. Social Safety Net Programmes in Bangladesh: A Review. Bangladesh Development Studies,
pp. Vol. XXXIV, June 2011, No.2.
Kidd, Stephen (2017). "Social exclusion and access to social protection schemes." Journal of Development
Effectiveness 9, no. 2 (2017): 212-244.
London. Retrieved from papers2://publication/uuid/75BCFC6D-81BA-4A12-9322-3E0B1D74ACEF
Miorelli, R., 2018. Variations of consolidation: cash transfer programme reforms in Chile and
Ecuador. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du
développement, 39(1), pp.55-71.