0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Survey on Sustainable Product Buying Trends

The document presents statistical data regarding consumer attitudes towards eco-friendly and sustainable products, including age group and gender demographics. It includes mean scores and standard deviations for various questions related to purchasing decisions influenced by sustainability claims and social media recommendations. The data suggests a general inclination towards eco-friendly products, with varying degrees of influence from brand authenticity and marketing strategies.

Uploaded by

www.baviajain
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Survey on Sustainable Product Buying Trends

The document presents statistical data regarding consumer attitudes towards eco-friendly and sustainable products, including age group and gender demographics. It includes mean scores and standard deviations for various questions related to purchasing decisions influenced by sustainability claims and social media recommendations. The data suggests a general inclination towards eco-friendly products, with varying degrees of influence from brand authenticity and marketing strategies.

Uploaded by

www.baviajain
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

count mean std min 25% 50% 75% max Mode

What’s your age group?109 2.201835 0.649499 1 2 2 2 5 2


What is your gender? 109 1.422018 0.496163 1 1 1 2 2 1
you buy eco-friendly or sustainable products?
109 2.972477 0.994975 1 2 3 4 5 3
our decision to buy sustainable
109products
3.357798 the1.613157
most? 1 2 3 5 6 2
a brand’s sustainability claims
109before purchasing?
2.321101 1.017265 1 2 2 3 4 2
friendly (greenwashing), I stop
109buying from them.
3.357798 (1 = Strongly1Disagree, 52 = Strongly3 Agree) 4
1.236205 5 3
akes a brand feel more authentic in its sustainability
109 3.036697 1.177935 claims? 1 2 3 4 5 4
e, carbon neutral) when buying109products. 3(1 =1.13855
Strongly Disagree,1 5 = Strongly
2 Agree) 3 4 5 3
buy a product with an eco-label, even if it costs
109 2.036697 0.826938 slightly more? 1 1 2 3 3 3
) about green products more 109 than 3.412844
traditional1.020267
advertisements. (11 = Strongly3 Disagree,45 = Strongly
4 Agree) 5 4
ble product because of a social media influencer’s
109 1.917431 0.682159 recommendation?
1 1 2 2 3 2
roduct, I am more likely to try109
it. (1 = Strongly
3.284404 Disagree, 5 = Strongly
1.155436 1 Agree)2 3 4 5 4
If a brand isWhat’s
caught
Howyour
often
misleading
WhatWhat
age
do
influences
group?
you
isI actively
your
consumers
Do
buyyou
gender?
eco-friendly
your
look
research
decision
about
Which
for eco-labels
abeing
orbrand’s
of
tosustainable
the
buy
eco-friendly
following
sustainable
(e.g.,
sustainability
Would
organic,
products?
makes
(greenwashing),
you
products
fair
claims
be
a brand
trade,
more
the
before
feel
likely
carbon
most?
I stop
purchasing?
more
toneutral)
buying
buy
authentic
a product
from
when
in
them.
its
buying
with
sustainability
(1an=products.
eco-label,
Stronglyclaims?
(1
Disagree
even
= Stro
if
What’s your age group? 1 0.192956 0.237924 -0.087238 -0.014914 -0.090775 0.111255 0.21286 0.0378
What is your gender?
0.192956 1 0.173794 -0.05158 -0.087517 -0.172981 -0.058429 -0.032782 0.119876
you buy eco-friendly or0.237924
sustainable products?
0.173794 1 -0.016883 -0.02778 -0.037087 0.214177 0.367811 -0.077536
our decision to buy sustainable
-0.087238products-0.05158 the-0.016883
most? 1 0.081686 0.05593 -0.089811 0.035289 0.024771
a brand’s sustainability-0.014914
claims before
-0.087517purchasing?
-0.02778 0.081686 1 -0.07748 -0.017652 -0.239834 0.206003
friendly (greenwashing), I stop buying
-0.090775 -0.172981from -0.037087
them. (1 = Strongly
0.05593Disagree,
-0.077485 = Strongly1 Agree)
0.213452 0.381559 0.122901
akes a brand feel more authentic in its sustainability claims?
0.111255 -0.058429 0.214177 -0.089811 -0.017652 0.213452 1 0.276161 -0.077441
e, carbon neutral) when 0.21286
buying products.
-0.032782(1 0.367811
= Strongly 0.035289
Disagree, -0.239834
5 = Strongly0.381559
Agree) 0.276161 1 0.019669
buy a product with an eco-label, even if it costs slightly more?
0.0378 0.119876 -0.077536 0.024771 0.206003 0.122901 -0.077441 0.019669 1
) about green products more
0.012819than-0.255907
traditional0.020418
advertisements.
0.156955(1 =0.004911
Strongly Disagree,
0.1607675 0.256933
= Strongly 0.223187
Agree) 0.003826
ble product because of0.121556
a social media influencer’s
0.131263 -0.098873recommendation?
0.245865 0.238707 0.046337 -0.065333 0.023843 0.448602
roduct, I am more likely0.046183
to try it. (1-0.08209
= Strongly Disagree,
0.280712 5 = Strongly
-0.065036 Agree) 0.044783 0.046686 0.056308 -0.049787
-0.078415
)taabout
promotes
sustainable
green
a green
products
product
product,
because
more Ithan
am
of more
traditional
a social
likely
media
advertisements.
to try
influencer’s
it. (1 = Strongly
recommendation?
(1 = Strongly
Disagree,
Disagree,
5 = Strongly
5 = Strongly
Agree) Agree)
0.012819 0.121556 0.046183
-0.255907 0.131263 -0.08209
0.020418 -0.098873 0.280712
0.156955 0.245865 -0.065036
0.004911 0.238707 -0.078415
0.160767 0.046337 0.044783
0.256933 -0.065333 0.046686
0.223187 0.023843 0.056308
0.003826 0.448602 -0.049787
1 -0.030391 0.213656
-0.030391 1 -0.15789
0.213656 -0.15789 1

Common questions

Powered by AI

Social media influencers have a moderate impact on promoting sustainable products. This is illustrated by a score of 1.917431 for being likely to purchase a sustainable product due to influencer recommendations and correlation data indicating some positive influence from social media promotion .

Gender appears to have a limited influence on attitudes towards buying sustainable products, as indicated by a low correlation coefficient with most sustainability-related factors, suggesting that gender differences are not significantly pronounced in this context .

There appears to be a relationship where brands deemed authentic could face severe backlash if found to be greenwashing, as the mean score for stopping purchases from misleading brands is substantial. Authenticity scores, although slightly lower at 3.036697, suggest consumer expectation of truthfulness, enhancing consumer backlash if violated .

Key determinants include consumer agreement with the statement on researching brand sustainability, with a mean score of 2.321101. Other factors like previous experiences or brand reputation might also influence this decision .

Consumers appear to trust green product promotions over traditional advertisements, as indicated by a higher mean score of 3.412844 for believing in green product promotions over traditional ones .

The importance of a product's eco-label on consumer purchasing decisions is indicated by a mean score of 2.036697 for willingness to pay slightly more for eco-labeled products and an influence score of 0.367811 towards actively looking for eco-labels. These metrics suggest moderate importance and consideration given to eco-labels among consumers .

Social media has a notable impact, reflected by a positive correlation of 0.238707 for influencers recommending sustainable products and encouraging trials. The effect is supportive but not overwhelmingly convincing, pointing to a trend rather than a definitive influence .

Attributes making a brand appear authentic in its sustainability claims have a mean score of 3.036697. Specific attributes, such as transparency in sustainability practices or prominent eco-labels, may contribute to perceived authenticity, but details are not explicitly provided in the data.

A consumer is most likely to stop purchasing from a brand accused of greenwashing if they have a high agreement with the statement 'If a brand is caught misleading consumers about being eco-friendly (greenwashing), I stop buying from them,' which has a mean agreement score of 3.357798 and a mode of 3. This suggests that although there is a tendency towards agreeing, not all consumers may decide to stop purchasing immediately, indicating a diverse range of responses.

There is no direct mention of the correlation between age and purchasing eco-friendly products in the data. However, the response to eco-friendly purchasing habits in general might not be directly correlated to age as both 'What's your age group?' and 'How often do you buy eco-friendly or sustainable products?' are separate independent variables with less direct correlation data provided .

You might also like