Comprehensive Review of Energy Storage Systems
Comprehensive Review of Energy Storage Systems
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Energy storage is one of the hot points of research in electrical power engineering as it is essential in power
Renewable energy systems. It can improve power system stability, shorten energy generation environmental influence, enhance
Energy storage system system efficiency, and also raise renewable energy source penetrations. This paper presents a comprehensive
Power system
review of the most popular energy storage systems including electrical energy storage systems, electrochemical
Energy storage applications
Electrical vehicle
energy storage systems, mechanical energy storage systems, thermal energy storage systems, and chemical en
Energy sustainability ergy storage systems. More than 350 recognized published papers are handled to achieve this goal, and only 272
Power system reliability selected papers are introduced in this work. A comparison between each form of energy storage systems based on
Energy storage forms capacity, lifetime, capital cost, strength, weakness, and use in renewable energy systems is presented in a tabular
Hybrid energy storage system form. Selected studies concerned with each type of energy storage system have been discussed considering
challenges, energy storage devices, limitations, contribution, and the objective of each study. The integration
between hybrid energy storage systems is also presented taking into account the most popular types. Hybrid
energy storage system challenges and solutions introduced by published research are summarized and analyzed.
A selection criteria for energy storage systems is presented to support the decision-makers in selecting the most
appropriate energy storage device for their application. For enormous scale power and highly energetic storage
applications, such as bulk energy, auxiliary, and transmission infrastructure services, pumped hydro storage and
compressed air energy storage are currently suitable. Battery, flywheel energy storage, super capacitor, and
superconducting magnetic energy storage are technically feasible for use in distribution networks. With an en
ergy density of 620 kWh/m3, Li-ion batteries appear to be highly capable technologies for enhanced energy
storage implementation in the built environment. Nonetheless, lead-acid batteries continue to offer the finest
balance between price and performance because Li-ion batteries are still somewhat costly. The applications of
energy storage systems have been reviewed in the last section of this paper including general applications, energy
utility applications, renewable energy utilization, buildings and communities, and transportation. Finally, recent
developments in energy storage systems and some associated research avenues have been discussed. Academics
and engineers interested in energy storage strategies might refer to this review.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [Link]@[Link] (V. Bureš).
[Link]
Received 28 February 2024; Received in revised form 8 June 2024; Accepted 26 June 2024
Available online 1 July 2024
2211-467X/© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license ([Link]
nc/4.0/).
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
consumers in remote areas far away from the grid as well as reduce the (see Fig. 3).
intermittency of renewable energy [4,5], and [6]. Energy can be stored Figures (4-9) show the number of published papers and number of
in many forms, such as thermal, mechanical, chemical, or electro citations that interested in ESS technologies using the keywords (ther
chemical energy. Besides, it can be stored in electric and magnetic fields mal energy storage system, pumped hydro energy storage, super
resulting in many types of storing devices such as superconducting capacitors, SMES and battery) over the last 17 years. As can be observed
magnetic energy storage (SMES), flow batteries, supercapacitors, com in Figs. 4 and 8, there are also a lot of studies on thermal and battery
pressed air energy storage (CAES), flywheel energy storage (FES), and energy storage, which is a hot spot of ESS and suggests that the authors
pumped hydro storage (PHS) 96 % of the global amplitude of energy are more interested in these. Furthermore, the number of papers
storage capacity is shared by the PHS. Super-capacitor energy storage, reviewing ESS keeps rising each year, showing that ESS is a popular area
battery energy storage, and flywheel energy storage have the advantages of research that is receiving a lot of attention. For more clarification
of strong climbing ability, flexible power output, fast response speed, review, all figures have been merged in to one figure (Fig. 9). It can be
and strong plasticity [7]. More development is needed for electrome observed that the number of research in ESS technologies continues to
chanical storage coming from batteries and flywheels [8]. increase in the last 17 years.
With the rapid rising of the development of ESS and due to the In this paper, different types of energy storge are presented. Various
enormous energy storage potential, all the efforts of researchers are ESS features, advantages, and limitations are discussed. In addition to,
focusing on giving reviews on the types, characteristics, advantages, hybrid energy storage systems and some of its combinations are listed
limitations, comparison, electrical vehicle, evaluations, challenges, and here. Furthermore, several applications of ESS along with challenges
applications of ESS. Some reviews are discussed, presented and and new trends in ESS are critically reviewed.
compared with our work in a tabular form in Table 1. The rest of this paper is as follows, section 2 discusses the different
Table 1 revealed that no review had included every one of the pre types of ESS, their operation, characteristics, advantages, limitations
viously listed points. For this reason, this review has included new de and applications. Hybrid energy storage systems in addition to several
velopments in energy storage systems together with all of the previously typical HESS combinations are presented in section 3. In section 4, the
mentioned factors. Statistical analysis is done using statistical data from challenges for integrating ESS is discussed. The selection criteria for ESS
the “Web of Science”. The number of papers with the theme “Energy is listed in section 5. Furthermore, in section 6, the applications of ESS
storage” over the past 20 years (2002–2022) is shown in Fig. 2 and it is are presented. Section 7 discusses new trends in ESS. Finally, conclusion
deduced from it that ESS is a hot research field with extensive attention inferred from this review paper and recommendatios are listed in section
2
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 1
Some reviews focusing on storage energy.
Ref. Types Advantages Limitations Comparison Electrical vehicle Selecting criteria Applications Challenges
[1] ✓ ✓ ✓ × × × × ×
[2] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ ✓ ×
[9] ✓ ✓ ✓ × × × × ×
[10] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ ✓ ✓
[11] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ × ✓
[8] ✓ ✓ ✓ × × × ✓ ×
[12] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × × × ✓
[13] × × × ✓ × × × ✓
[14] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ × ×
[15] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ ✓ ×
[16] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ ✓ ✓
[17] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ ✓ ×
[18] ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ ✓
Our work ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Fig. 2. Number of articles and citations reviewing ESS over the last 20 years.
3
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Fig. 6. Number of articles reviewing Super capacitors over the last 17 years.
4
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Fig. 8. Number of articles reviewing battery energy storage system BESS over the last 17 years.
5
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
2.1. Electric energy storage systems (EESS) will be very expensive [7].
It can be categorized to electrostatic and magnetic systems. The 2.1.2. Supercapacitors (SCs)
capacitor and the supercapacitor are electrostatic systems while the To conquer the problems mentioned above of the capacitors, the
SMESS is a magnetic system [9]. supercapacitors or ultracapacitors are patented by the Japanese com
pany Nippon Electric Company in 1975 [20]. Compared with conven
2.1.1. Capacitors (Cs) tional capacitors, supercapacitors have very high output power of
Two metal plates called electrodes separated by dielectric layer form (50–100 KW), high charge density, life likelihood of 12 years, 500,000
the electric capacitor. One plate is charged while the other plate is times life cycle and high self-discharge [15]. Therefore, SC are suitable
induced by an opposite sign charge [19]. The energy is stored on the for application which required instant high output power like engine
surface of the metal electrodes. This type storeenergy for extremely cranking applications of hybrid vehicles and permanent magnet syn
short periods [12]. Fig. 11 shows a schematic diagram for a capacitor. chronous generator. SCs and Cs have identical operating principles.
Plates size the distance between plates and the dielectric material are the Despite, in SC, electrolytic physical barrier comprising of activated
factors affecting the capacitor energy capacity [14]. The capacitors are carbon is used as a dielectric which allows ionic conduction, and this
suitable for small scale power applications as they have an instant assists the SC to have large specific area and so high energy density [21].
recharge capabilities and long lift cycle. For large scale applications, it The other difference is in the electrode materials, SCs use carbon nano
6
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
[Link]. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PEV). The PEV is a form of HEV
in which the battery is charged from an external source. PEV can run on
both battery and gasoline. These batteries can be charged at a charging
station or at home using an ordinary plug or by a regenerative braking
system [34]. For short distances, it uses battery banks and for long
distances, it utilizes gasoline power when battery power is depleted
[50]. Because of decreasing moving parts of PEV, it has lower mainte
nance cost. The typical configuration of PEV is presented in Fig. 16.
Fig. 12. Schematic diagram of an individual cell of a SC. There are two ways of working of PEV. The first one is grid to the vehicle
7
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 2
Characteristics of different EES devices.
EESS Capacity (MW) Lifetime (Years) Capital cost (€/kWh) Strength Weakness Use in RE Systems
[Link]. EVs utilization as ESS. The market for electric vehicles (EVs) is
growing quickly on a global scale. It is expected that market share will
rise significantly in next few years [52]. Globally, there were more than
5 million electric vehicles (EVs) in use in 2018. It is anticipated that this
number will increase rapidly to 44 million by 2030 [52]. The power
system has traditionally struggled to balance generation and load de
mand; however, EV integration into the grid presents additional diffi
culties. The growing popularity of electric vehicles (EVs) presents
substantial operational difficulties for the power grid since the patterns
of EV charging and discharging need to be carefully controlled to
maintain system stability and dependability. It is more difficult to bal
ance the supply and demand of electricity when EV charging is dynamic
and renewable energy sources are sporadic [53]. To solve these issues,
numerous approaches and technologies are being developed, including
as vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology, smart charging infrastructure, and
sophisticated grid management systems. These technologies allow for
Fig. 14. Suitable technologies for EV [32]. bidirectional power transfer between EVs and the grid, improve grid
flexibility, and optimize EV charging and discharging patterns [54].
EV batteries have a fast reaction time, which makes them ideal for
Table 3 auxiliary functions like frequency regulation. EV batteries can play a
The characteristics of different types of EVs [34,35]. significant role in preserving grid stability and balancing the frequency
Characteristic BEV PHEV FCEV of the power system due to their quick response to variations in power
supply or demand. This increases the potential value of EVs in sustaining
Energy system -Battery -Battery -FC
-UC -ICE -Battery
the overall performance and dependability of the power grid and makes
-UC -UC them a desirable alternative for providing auxiliary services [55]. To
Energy source -Charging power -Charging power -Hydrogen fuel optimize EV integration benefits while preserving system stability,
station station effective coordination between renewable energy generation, EV
-Fuel pump
charging, and grid operations is essential. For EVs to be seamlessly in
-Gasoline
Energy supply -Limited by battery -Limited by battery -Unlimited tegrated into the power grid, standards, incentives, and policies must be
capacity -Capacity -capacity established in close coordination with automakers, energy providers,
Carbon emissions -Zero emissions -Some emissions -Zero emissions and regulatory agencies [56]. Some work contributions with several
Price factors -Battery price -Battery price -Battery price issues using EESS are tabulated in Table 4.
-Market electricity -Market electricity -Market
-Price -Price electricity
-Gasoline price -Price
- Fuel price
2.2. Electrochemical energy storage systems (ECESS)
Advantage -Zero emissions -Less emissions -Zero emissions
-Independence on -Long-distance -High efficiency ECESS converts chemical to electrical energy and vice versa [14].
fossil fuels covered ECESS are Lead acid, Nickel, Sodium –Sulfur, Lithium batteries and flow
Disadvantage -High initial cost -Dependence on -Hydrogen fuel
battery (FB) [9]. ECESS are considered a major competitor in energy
-Battery fossil fuels storage
replacement -Higher cost -High cost of storage applications as they need very little maintenance, have high
fuel efficiency of 70–80 %, have the greatest electrical energy storage (10
Degree of -Extensive use -Being popularized -Test stage Wh/kg to 13 kW/kg) [15] and easy construction, [1]. However, there
application are some barriers high maintenance costs in large-scale facilities, their
lifetime depend on depth-of-discharge (DoD) and relative low cycling
(G2V) whereby, the battery charges from the grid to drive the vehicle times [9].
and charge the battery. The second one is the vehicle to grid (V2G) in
which the battery provides power to the grid to overcome the grid 2.2.1. Lead acid batteries
overload problem [31]. In regenerative braking mode, the traction The most heavily used rechargeable battery is the lead–acid battery
motor acts as a generator to charge the battery [51]. PEV can drive for a [80]. They are composed of lead dioxide (PbO2) as the positive electrode
proper distance, but it has some drawbacks like its initial cost is higher and lead dioxide (PbO2) as the negative electrode immersed in an
than BEV and it produces more emissions than BEV. Owing to these electrolyte mitigated solution of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) [81]. Lead–acid
reasons, BEV is obtaining more approval than PHEV [34]. batteries have very tiny response time, little daily self-discharge rates,
relatively high efficiencies, small capital costs, and can be stablished for
8
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
This storage system has many merits like there is no self-discharge, high
energy densities (150–300 Wh/L), high energy efficiency (89–92 %),
low maintenance and materials cost, non-toxic materials, and materials
can be recycled [87]. NaS batteries used for grid connected applications
like power quality enhancing and peak shaving [85]. However, the de
merits are high operating cost (80 $/kW/year) to obtain liquid elec
trodes, and a high temperature (574–624 K) chemical reaction is
required. So, an additional system is used which adds an extra cost and it
is suitable only for large scale power system applications [85]. The
research mainly focuses on improving the cell performance and
Fig. 16. Typical structure of PEV [31]. decreasing the high temperature operating costs [1].
the large scale applications [82]. On the other hand, they have restricted 2.2.5. Flow batteries (FBs)
life cycle, usually require a ventilation system, and charging and dis Flow battery consists of two liquid electrolytes which stored in two
charging process are not identical [83]. The schematic diagram for led dissolvable redox couples enclosed in external tanks to increase the
acid batteries during charging and discharging is shown in Fig. 17. energy storage capacity [88]. These electrolytes can be pumped from the
tanks to the cell stack, and they are separated by a microscopic mem
2.2.2. Lithium-ion battery (Li-Ion battery) brane to allow a restricted ions number to pass over it. Through the
This type of battery is very appropriate for portable applications such electrolyte solutions reduction oxidation reactions, the electricity is
as laptops and mobile phones because of its low weight, good perfor produced [89]. The flow battery schematic diagram is shown in Fig. 21.
mance, fast response time, and high cycle effeciency. Also, It can also be Unlike the FC, the chemical reactions taking place inside the flow bat
used to improve the performance of EVs [12]. In a Li-Ion battery, the teries are reversible. So, it can be recharged without replacing the
cathode is made of a lithium metal oxide, such as LiCoO2 and LiMO2, electroactive material. The FB’s power rating relies upon the stacks
and the anode is made of graphitic carbon as shown in Fig. 18 [82]. The number of the cell and the electrode size [15]. FB can release huge
Li-Ion battery current research spotlights on using nanoscale materials amount of energy at a high discharge rate and has a good life cycle (10,
for improving the power capability of the battery and heightening bat 000 full cycles during their lifetime) [90]. FBs have tiny response time,
tery specific energy by progressing advanced electrode materials and have high efficiency, and operate near to the ambient temperature [85].
electrolyte solutions [82]. Evaluation of various battery technologies’ parameters in a comparison
is presented in Table 5. In addition to, some characteristics of every type
2.2.3. Nickel - cadmium battery (NiCd) from electrochemical energy storage systems ECESS including their
These batteries are commercially used since about 1915. The two strength and weakness issues are presented in Table 6.
electrodes of these batteries are nickel hydroxide and metallic cadmium. It has been noticed from Table 7 above that there are plenty of papers
The electrolyte is made of an aqueous alkali solution as presented in that concerned with challenges and limitations of batteries (Li- io bat
Fig. 19 [82]. NiCd batteries have low maintenance, relative high effi tery, Na–S battery and lead acid battery). Batteries can be used in
ciencies, and the ability to work in a wide range of low temperatures different systems as grid connected or isolated systems providing the
(from − 20 ◦ C to − 40 ◦ C). However, they can affect the environment as advantages of minimizing cost (total cost, maintenance cost or invest
cadmium and nickel are toxic heavy metals, NiCd batteries cost is up to ment cost), preventing voltage fluctuation in LV distribution network,
10 times greater than the Li-ion batteries [85]. NiCd battery can be used maximizing PV utilization and minimizing losses. There are various
for large energy storage for renewable energy systems. The efficiency of optimization techniques that can be used for catching these benefits.
NieCd battery storage depends on the technology used during their
production [12].
2.3. Mechanical energy storage system (MESS)
2.2.4. Sodium sulfur battery (NaS)
In the NaS battery, molten sodium and molten sulfur compose the MES is one of the oldest forms of energy that used for a lot of ap
two electrodes and uses beta alumina as the solid electrolyte. A scheme plications. It can be stored easily for long periods of time. It can be easily
of a NaS battery cell is shown below in Fig. 20 [82]. This battery can converted into and from other energy forms [15]. Three forms of MESs
supply high rated capacity than other types of batteries (up to 244.8 are drawn up, include pumped hydro storage, compressed air energy
MWh). So, it is built for high power energy storage applications [86]. storage systems that store potential energy, and flywheel energy storage
system which stores kinetic energy.
9
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 4
Challenges and limitations of EESS.
Ref Challenge ESS Isolated/Grid Limitation Contribution
Device connected
[19] Minimize operating cost (fuel + startup SMES Islanded Power quality is not Using the modified LR-PSO method on IEEE 10-unit thermal bus
cost) improved system with and without SMES
[23] Control SMES terminal voltage SMES Grid Power quality is not A new security circuit is proposed for highly inductive loads to
connected improved ensure safe operation in case of fault.
[57] Control of SC’SOC SC Isolated Cost is not considered The strategy improved the reliability of the system and reduced
Minimizing Power loss the required communication data.
[58] Control fluctuation of wind power SC BESS Grid High cost Design system composed of HESS to control wind power
connected fluctuations by using fuzzy logic control.
[59] Minimize cost SC BESS Isolated Power quality is not Design a HESS used for distributed generation system to meet the
Minimize fuel improved demand for a UK family and reduce the generator operating time.
Minimize system efficiency
[60] Using SC to control high voltage ride SC Grid The overall power Design a control system for wind turbine generator to control
through (HVRT) for wind turbine connected quality is unsatisfactory HVRT using SC.
generation system.
[61] Controlling system frequency. SC Grid Cost is not considered Using fuzzy logic control strategy for control frequency of DFIG,
connected SC and wind farm system under variable wind speed.
[62] - Control SOC of SC SC Isolated Power quality is not EMS depends on using SOC of SC and DC voltage fluctuation as a
Minimize DC voltage fluctuation improved. reference to perform a double closed loop to control SC.
[63] -Minimize DC voltage fluctuation. SC Isolated Cost is not considered Design a three-level bidirectional DC-DC converter to control the
-Control SOC of SC. SC power flow.
Using model predictive control to control the converter.
[64] Optimal design of SMES system SMES – Grid Lack of ESS control Design micro grid system with SMES integrated system of capacity
BESS connected 1.2 MW for a micro grid system
[65] Reduce system cost SMES Grid Power quality is not Using an adaptive fractional-order sliding-mode control
connected improved (AFOSMC) to improve the dynamic response of SMES against
various operating conditions
[66] Mitigate the fluctuations of PV output SMES Grid Cost and losses are not Using HESS composed of high temperature superconducting coils
during a cloud passing. BESS connected considered based superconducting magnetic energy storage (HTS SMES) and
battery for voltage control.
[44] Voltage control of DC grids connected to SMES Grid Cost is not considered Design of SMES system. control system of SMES
wind farms connected
[67] Smoothing the output of the wind farms SMES Grid losses are not taken into Improving the wind farms transient stability using a control
connected account. strategy of the SMES in parallel with voltage source inverter.
[68] Improve the grid power quality SMES Grid High system cost Adding SMES in VSC based active filter for reducing THD.
connected
[69] Control the fluctuation of frequency due SMES Isolated Losses are not Design the fuzzy PI controller for SMES.
to transient load changes. considered
[70] Compensate voltage fluctuations for a SMES Grid Neglecting losses and Using battery and SMES based dynamic voltage resistor for
grid connected hybrid renewable system BESS connected cost. compensating voltage fluctuations.
[71] Smoothing output power for DFIG and SMES Grid Battery degradation is Usin transient voltage control (TVC) method to reduce the PCC’VD
PMSG. connected not considered and enhances the overall system performance
[72] Design a multistage SMES SMES Isolated Cost is not considered. Design a multistage SMES and study the system performance with
the conventional SMES and multistage SMES.
[73] Optimization the SMES coil dimensions SMES Isolated Power quality is not Using a multi- objective function GA to minimize the coil losses.
improved
[74] - Increasing system efficiency SC BESS Isolated Battery degradation is Design a bidirectional DC_DC converter for HESS for EV and HEV.
- Minimizing cost not considered
[75] Control SOC of SC banks SC BESS Isolated Battery degradation is Design a new multi-source inverter MSI for integration SC and B
not taken into account for EV.
[76] -Control SOC of SC SC BESS Grid Power quality is not Dynamic wireless power transfer WPT system for charging EV.
-Minimize the system cost connected improved
[77] -Minimize system cost SC Li-ion Grid Optimal design of EV based HESS composed of Li-ion B and SC to
-Control SOC of SC Battery connected minimize the system cost, improve power quality, and increase the
overall efficiency.
[78] Control current and voltage of the SC BESS Isolated Cost is not considered Control strategy for EV based on HESS composed of SC and B to
system. control SOC of SC and prolong battery life.
[79] Minimize battery current ripples and SC SC li-ion Isolated Cost is not considered Implementation fuzzy logic on EV based on HESS
current fluctuation. Battery
2.3.1. Flywheel energy storage (FES) diagram of FES is presented in Fig. 22. The flywheel is kept on a low
FES was first developed by John A. Howell in 1983 for military ap pressure state to reduce the frictional losses [10]. FES can be used for
plications [100]. It is composed of a massive rotating cylinder which is load levelling and peak shaving and reducing the RES intermittencies by
sustained over a stator and electric motor/generator is jointed with the supplying real power to the system when necessary [102,103]. Because
flywheel. In FES, kinetic energy or rotational energy is transformed to of FES fast response, it can be used for enhancing system stability for
electrical energy by using electric generator on the discharging mode penetration RES in power systems [104]. Relied on rotational speed, the
and vice versa on the charging mode. Permanent magnet machines are FES can be classified into two categories: low-speed FES (less than 6000
commonly used for FESs because of their high efficiencies, high power rpm) and high-speed FES (about 104 − 105 rpm) [17,21]. The low speed
densities, and low rotor losses [101]. The FES capacity is proportional to FES is suitable for power reliability applications, and it has low cost.
its mass and the square of speed [9]. Its efficiency relies on the energy High speed FES is good for traction and aerospace applications and its
storage usage time. FES is not suitable for storing energy on long-term cost is five times larger than low speed FES [10]. FES has many merits
basis so, it is combined with other devices [14]. The schematic like high power and energy density, long lifetime and lower periodic
10
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
versa when the demand is high. The electricity is then generated from
the stored water to supply power for momentary peaks or for unpre
dicted outages [12]. To produce a variable output power, the inlet water
flow is controlled using gates and variable-speed drives can be utilized
for regulation while charging [7]. PHES needs some conditions like,
location existence besides difference in height [7]. PHES has many ad
vantages such as long life time (40–60 years), fast response time, low
cost, high efficiency, ability to store enormous amounts of energy, and
very low self-discharge rate [103,105]. In contrast, it has some disad
vantages such as it needs huge water source, massive environmental
affect, and not much possible sites [103].
Heat or cold is stored in TESS for later use. These systems consist of a
Fig. 19. Nickel–Cadmium cell [82].
heat storage tank, an energy transfer media, and a control system. Heat
is stored in an insulated tank using a specific technology [12]. Utilizing
maintenance, small recharge time, temperature insensitivity, 85%–90 %
these systems reduces energy consumption and overcome the problem of
efficiency, high charging and discharging rate, large energy storage
intermittency in renewable energy systems [82]. TESS has some ad
capacity, and clean energy. On the other hand, it has some demerits,
vantages like, clean energy source for generating electricity, reducing
small discharge time, intricate structure, mechanical stress, protection
heating or cooling energy demand for buildings, low initial cost,
anxieties because of high rotor speed and breaking likelihood, and high
reducing emissions, increasing continuity, and reducing maintenance
cost [102].
cost [85,121]. On the other hand, some concerns should be considered
such as: increasing complexity, the overall efficiency for TESS is low
2.3.2. Pump hydro energy storage (PHES)
(30–50 %), thermal losses, and the possible prescribed space [121]. A
PHES composed of two natural or manufacturing positioned/
simplified TES diagram is presented in Fig. 25. TESS is mostly utilized
designed at higher and lower heights [14]. In Fig. 23, the components of
for industrial, residential buildings for generating electricity besides
PHES is presented which involve: upper reservoir, lower reservoir,
producing water, and is often used in PV systems which guarantee col
motor, generator and inlet valve. When the electricity demand is low,
lecting much amount of energy from the sun [10,12]. Thermal energy
the water is lifted from the inferior reservoir to the higher one and vise
can be stored in the form of latent heat, sensible heat, and reversible
11
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 6
Strength and weakness for electrochemical energy storage systems ECESS.
Storage type strength weakness Use in RE
systems
12
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
13
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Fig. 22. Schematic diagram of flywheel energy storage system source [102].
Table 8
Strength and weakness for mechanical energy storage systems.
Strength Weakness Use in RE
systems
14
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 9
Challenges and limitations of MESS for different systems.
Ref Challenge ESS Isolated/Grid Limitation Contribution
Device connected
[109] -Minimize cost FES Isolated Power quality is not Planning ESS with studying the effects of transmission losses and increased
Minimize losses improved penetration of RE.
[110] -Control DC link voltage FES Grid connected PQ is unsatisfactory Control of FES in case of Uncertainties using tube based MPC.
Control FES speed
[111] -Minimize cost PHES Grid connected PQ is not improved Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) to get the
Minimize losses optimal size of standalone system and comparing the results of this method
with GA, Simulated Annealing method (SA) and weighted sum approach
(WSA).
[112] Minimize cost CAES Isolated Computational Using modified bacteria foraging algorithm to get the optimal configuration
complexity of HES based CAES and comparing the results with differential evolution.
[113] Minimize the overall cost CAES Grid connected Power quality is not Using The Monte–Carlo simulation method to estimate the (electrical,
improved thermal, gas load, wind turbine and electricity price) uncertainties.
Considering P2G technology, along with the CAES system, reduce gas costs
and the total operating cost of EHS and reduce the amount
of electricity sold from the upstream network.
[114] Control active power, reactive CAES Grid connected Cost is not considered Implement a transient stability model of a system composed of two CAES.
power, and SOC. Studying the effects of cavern sizes on the system frequency
[115] Minimize system cost CAES Isolated Computational Using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) to study the benefits of utilizing CAES
complexity for RES.
[116] Control system voltage PHES Isolated Cost is not considered Generating a continuous power from PHES for a hybrid system consists of
[117] Minimize cost PHES Isolated Computational mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) for short term scheduling for
complexity WTHS
[118] Smoothing Fluctuations of PHES Grid connected Cost is not considered Using fuzzy CEEMDAN algorithm to calculate the target power combined
Photovoltaic Power system composed of cascade hydro stations, PV, and PHES.
[119] -Minimize the integral of time PHES Isolated Degradation of BESS is Using coyote-optimization algorithm (COA) to control MG system
multiplied absolute error BESS not considered. containing of wind, solar, biodiesel and a storage system composed of (mini-
(ITAE). Cost is not considered. PHES and BESS) for getting a reliable system performance.
[120] Cost reduction PHES Isolated Battery degradation is Using HOMER to perform comparative analysis for nine HRES.
BESS not considered
Table 10
Strength – weakness of TESS and their use in RES systems [9].
TESS strength Weakness Use in RES system
15
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 11
Challenges and limitations of TESS for different systems.
REF Challenge ESS Isolated/ Limitation contribution
Device Grid
connected
1
Overall : H2 + O2 ⇒H2 O
2
FCs are categorized based on the used electrolyte. These are: alkaline
FC, phosphoric acid FC, solid oxide FC, molten carbonate FC, proton
exchange membrane FC (PEMFC), and direct methanol FC. Among all,
Fig. 28. Scheme of chemical process of hydrogen production [103].
16
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
hydrogen storage capacity is presented in Fig. 29 [1]. 3. Hybrid energy storage system (HESS)
2.5.3. Ammonia storage HESS is made by integrating more than one type of energy storage
Ammonia can be easily stored in large quantities in liquid form, systems. It has a great importance, as renewable energy sources have
making it an ideal chemical store for renewable energy. The idea stems intermittent characteristics in energy production and it is difficult for a
from the fact that there is excess energy during the night and can be used single energy storage system to meet the energy requirements of a
in the production of ammonia and then stored for use when needed. particular consumer [7]. ESSs can work in either of two modes:
Storing hydrogen in large quantities is difficult and expensive, while high-power mode and high-energy mode. High-power ESSs like
ammonia is easier and cheaper to store and transport, and it can easily (flywheel ES, SMES, SCES, BESS, etc.), respond fast (few seconds to a few
be cracked to provide hydrogen gas when needed and used in fuel cells minutes) and has high power density. They can used for voltage stabi
[140]. lization and improve the power system dynamic response. On the other
hand, they have high self-discharge rate and high cost per unit capacity
2.5.4. Biofuels so, they are not appropriate for large capacity and long-term storage
Biofuels, are a eco-friendly, locally available, sustainable, and reli [150]. While high-energy ESSs such as (PHS, CAES, fuel cells, BESS, etc.)
able fuel obtained from renewable sources [141]. Plants are a source of respond slowly, and they have high energy density so, they can used for
biofuels, as they work to trap sunlight in the form of chemical energy long-term energy systems. Their demerits are that they have a short
inside them through the process of photosynthesis, and this energy can cycle life, cannot be charged and discharged rapidly, and are not suitable
be used to suitable forms and used for energy needs. Biofuels provide 3 for real-time scenarios requiring dynamic compensation [151]. Both
% of the world’s transportation fuel. Biofuels are in the form of liquid or modes are used for a single HESS application. HESS may improved
gaseous fuels that are produced from biomass by chemical, thermal, or performances, enhanced efficiency, increased life expectancy, and less
biological processes. Liquid fuels, like, ethanol, methanol, biodiesel, and ened costs [152]. HESSs can be used in several applications, such as in
gaseous fuels, like hydrogen and methane [141]. Liquid biofuels can be hybrid electric vehicles, fuel-cell-powered electric vehicles, renewable
utilized in transportation, engines, or fuel cells to generate electricity. energy supply systems utilizing battery/hydrogen combination,
The USA, Brazil, Germany, Argentina, and China are the leading coun grid-tied HESS in local or provincial use, and large-scale wind and solar
tries in the production of biofuels in the world, where they produced farms [151]. At present, HESS has come to be one of the hot investigated
together 80.2 % of the world biofuel production in 2018 [96]. fields all over the world. Here are several typical HESS combinations.
A study in Ref. [155] proposed the using of SMES and battery storage
system to stabilize a photovoltaic based microgrid. A comparison, using
MATLAB, between the system containing the SMES-battery and the
system of battery only is carried out. The study proved that the
SMES-battery is better in dealing with the microgrid transient faults and
the it can reduce the fault current to avoid an unnecessary off-grid. In
Ref. [66], the design of high temperature superconducting with the
battery to form HESS is proposed. The paper showed that; this config
uration can reduce the voltage fluctuation due to cloudy events and by
using low resistance of high temperature superconducting cables, the
voltage profile can be improved. Authors in Ref. [156] introduced the
design and implementation of SMES-battery hybrid energy storage sys
tem in electric vehicle (EV). It used a novel nonlinear robust
fractional-order control of SMES-battery to optimize the power demand.
A case study is carried out to verify the effectiveness of this control
strategy in improving the battery life cycle and compared with other
Fig. 29. Comparison of hydrogen storage capacity [1]. control methods.
17
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 12
Challenges and limitations of CESS for different systems.
REF Challenge ESS Isolated/Grid Limitation contribution
Device connected
[143] -Minimize total life cycle cost Hydrogen Isolated Power quality is not Optimal sizing of stand-alone system consists of PV, wind, and
Improve system reliability. improved. hydrogen storage.
[144] Minimize life cycle cost Hydrogen Isolated Battery degradation is Modelling and optimal design of [Link] optimization results
BESS not considered. demonstrate that HRES with BESS offers more cost effective and
reliable energy than HRES with hydrogen storage.
[145] -Minimize total net present cost TNPC FC Isolated Multi-objective design of HESS composed of PV, FC and diesel
-Minimize loss of power supply probability generator to supply power for an off-grid community.
(LPSP)
[146] Improve system reliability FC Isolated Computational Using multi objective PSO algorithm for optimal design of HRES.
-Minimize Loss of Power Supply Probability BESS complexity
(LPSP), levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE)
and Net Present Value (NPV).
Minimize CO2 emissions
[147] Minimize Loss of Power Supply Probability FC Isolated Battery degradation is new real-time optimization algorithm based on Lyapunov
(LPSP) BESS not considered optimization framework and novel queueing theory is proposed
to optimal design the SMG with BSS.
[148] Cost reduction Increase lifetime FC Isolated Power quality is not experimental plat- form designed and constructed to test
BESS improved operation modes for hydrogen renewable power plants
integrating HESS
[149] Minimize net present value of the operation Hydrogen Isolated Power quality is not Techno-economic optimization for HRES for off grid applications
cost. Increase lifetime BESS improved using Linear Programming.
In [157], authors provided a study of using a hybrid energy storage One of the main problems associated with batteries, is degradation
system combined of battery and flywheel to mitigate load fluctuations in problem. Owing to, rising in battery temperature because of the
electric ships. A typical prediction algorithm was developed for charging and discharging cycling and aging problem that affects the
demonstrate the validation of this strategy. Authors in Ref. [158] pro battery performance over the time. In Ref. [163], it is represented a
posed the installation of flywheel/battery HESS in a house on the island control strategy to manage a BESS in a microgrid for enhancing the ESS
in Greece for supplying the house with loads and a financial accounts are life time based on battery SOC and maximum capacity. The overall BESS
made for analysis its economic feasibility. In Ref. [159], authors rep life span enhanced by 57 %.
resented a residential Micro-Grid, consists of a photovoltaic plant inte
grated with a flywheel/battery HESS. A Matlab Simulink model (for AC
4.2. Battery SOC effects on ESS
and DC bus configurations) is developed. From the results, it is showed
that the AC bus MG is the better in interfacing with the grid than the DC
Energy storage systems’ stability and performance are highly
bus MG (peak current value is reduced by 58 % and transient time is 30
affected by the SOC. Some works have been studied these goals. A piece-
% shorter).
wise linear SOC controller has been created to stop BESS depletion
before it reaches minimum levels for integrating SOC into low-inertia
3.4. Compressed air and supercapacitor
power systems’ primary frequency control [164]. Furthermore,
another research has looked into SOC balancing control in distributed
In [160], aurhors introduced a HESS composed of CAES system and
battery systems. Researchers have used multi-agent consensus theory
super capacitors SCs to improve the power quality of the power grid. A
and dynamic event triggering coordination algorithms to efficiently
control strategy is developed for the system to track the 24 h power
accomplish SOC balance while consuming less communication [165].
demand curve effectively. Authors in Ref. [161] proposed a CAES – SCs
Also, fractional-order modeling and Kalman filters improve estimation
HESS to improve the voltage stability. Also, SCs can be used as a filter to
accuracy and dependability, demonstrating decreased errors compared
smooth the power outputs.
to standard approaches under diverse working situations [166]. Accu
rate SOC estimation is also essential for supercapacitor functioning. All
3.5. Thermal energy storage and batteries
of these investigations indicate how SOC has a major impact on energy
storage systems.
Authors in Ref. [132] introduced a HESS composed of thermal en
ergy storage system TES with Li-ion battery to solve the overheating
problem while using Li-ion battery only and improve the battery life 4.3. ESS sizing and allocation
cycle. In Ref. [133], authors examine HESS consists of TESS and batte
ries for heat handling battery management problem and reliability The sizing and placement of energy storage systems (ESS) are critical
improvement the battery. factors in improving grid stability and power system performance.
Numerous scholarly articles highlight the importance of the ideal ESS
4. Challenges for integrating energy storage systems placement and sizing for various power grid applications, such as
microgrids, distribution networks, generating, and transmission [167,
Reliability and sustainability are the main aspects related to inte 168]. Numerous crucial factors must be taken into account for Energy
grating ESSS to the modern power networks. However, this can be Storage System (ESS) sizing that is optimal. Market pricing, renewable
challenged. Hence, the next challenges should be considered for success imbalances, regulatory requirements, wind speed distribution, aggre
integration of ESS [162]. gate load, energy balance assessment, and the internal power production
model are some of these factors [169]. An ideal ESS size that guarantees
a steady supply of energy can be achieved by carefully taking into ac
count all of these factors [170]. An ESS that is appropriately sized and
18
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
distributed can save costs, improve the use of renewable energy, and 5. Choosing principles for energy storage systems
help with frequency management, all of which improve grid depend
ability and lower operating costs [171]. To address the difficulties in ESS There are many factors for selecting the suitable energy storage de
planning, design, and implementation, sophisticated approaches, algo vices such as [34,182]:
rithms, and optimization techniques are being created, opening the door
for more research and innovation in this area [172,173]. In distribution - Capacity: The system energy stored is determined based on the
networks with high Distributed Generation (DG) penetration, the capacity
placement of energy storage systems (ESSs) is critical to addressing - Power: How quickly the stored energy discharged and charged is
controlling voltage and system losses. Numerous approaches have been determined based on the power.
put out to optimize the placement and sizing of energy storage systems - Efficiency: It expresses the amount of energy lost during the storage
(ESSs) [174]. In order to identify the most efficient ESS size and location, period and during the charging/discharging cycle, as it is the ratio
these optimization procedures frequently use multi-objective functions between the energy provided to the consumer to the energy required
that take into consideration PV panel power, self-consumption schemes, for charging.
and the direction of demand growth. Distribution networks may expe - Storage period: Denotes how long the energy is stored.
rience better overall system efficiency, decreased losses, and improved - Charge and discharge time: Expresses the time for charging and
voltage management by carefully choosing where to install discharging.
energy-storage sensors using multi-objective optimization models and - Lifetime: Denotes the time to use energy storage equipment.
thorough sensitivity indices [175]. In order to facilitate power allocation - Cost: Depends on the storage equipment capital and operating costs
to various storage technologies inside the hybrid energy storage system and its life span.
HESS, a basic optimization approach for choosing a low-pass filter’s
cut-off frequency has been proposed in Ref. [168]. The features of Selection the superlative ESS for different applications is essential. In
storage technologies are greatly impacted by the optimal cut-off fre applications that require fast response such as frequency modulation,
quencies that are determined by the optimization framework. This reactive power support, smooth transmission, and power quality
highlights the significance of precise power allocation for efficient grid improvement where millisecond response time is vital. FES, SMES, SC,
support functions. and some batteries are highly recommended. Besides they have high
efficiency and long lifetime. However, they have small energy ratio. ESS
4.4. ESS financial feasibility based on energy storage with hourly level response time is needed for
energy time shift and capacity unit applications. PHES and CAES can be
Understanding the technical sides of ESS technology and its appli used for these applications [183]. Lead-acid batteries are used in many
cation’s economic viability is essential to assure the technology practi applications such as UPS, power quality and frequency regulation due to
cality. However, ESS’s economic studies were quite restricted, where their cost, reliability, and ripening of technology. In fact, the Li-ion
most of them, only the system capital cost was covered. For a compre battery has high efficiency and a large energy ratio, but its cost is
hensive technoeconomic analysis, should include system capital in high, therefore its use in power applications is limited [184]. The CESS
vestment, operational cost, maintenance cost, and degradation loss. and ECESS typically have greater efficiency but shorter response time.
Table 13 presents some of the research papers accomplished to over Moreover, MESS and TESS have longer discharge time and response
come challenges for integrating energy storage systems. speed. On the other hand, for the lifetime specification, the longer life
It can be conclded from Table 13 that there are various solutions to span time, the lower replacement costs [1]. Table 14 represents the
overcome challenges facing integrating energy storage devices in iso general characteristics for some of the above discussed ESS to help the
lated or grid connected systems. Utilization of HESS (SC + fuel cell, reader for choosing the appropriate ESS for its application [185]. pre
SMES + battery, battery + SC, etc) and applying optimization technique sented some indicators to facilitate decision-making/design of various
for optimal allcation or sizing of each device will lead to reducing cost, storage technologies include storage capacity, maximum charge/di
expanding ESS life time, improving efficiency and minimizing battery scharge power, depth of charge, durability, cost, maximum
degradation. self-discharge rate and storage weight.
From Tables 14 and it is apparent that the SC and SMES are conve
nient for small scale energy storage application. Besides, CAES is
appropriate for larger scale of energy storage applications than FES. The
Table 13
Solutions for energy storage systems challenges.
Ref Challenge ESS Device Isolated/Grid Limitation Contribution
connected
[176] Minimize energy cost Battery –SC Grid connected Design of the battery degradation process based on the characterization of semi-
empirical aging modelling and performance.
Modelling of the dynamic behavior of SCs.
[177] Minimize system cost Battery Isolated Battery degradation is Four different practical case studies, i.e., an off-grid rural village, telecom
Hydrogen not included. tower, stand-alone welding shop, and a backup for lift load system are selected
storage to demonstrate the proposed sizing methodology.
[178] High cost Battery Isolated Allocation is not Using evolutionary algorithms and mixed integer linear programming for sizing
Battery degradation Hydrogen concerned a MG containing PV panels, a BSS and HSS.
storage
[179] -Reduce system cost, SMES - lead- Grid connected Battery aging is not The performance of the proposed system is applied on a residential PV system in
improve efficiency acidbattery considered case of load leveling and system efficiency.
[180] Minimize energy cost Hydrogen fuel Isolated Battery aging is not The allocation of supercapacitor enables to mitigate the draw of high power
cell taken into account consumption, to avoid all fast charge/discharge cycles and consequently to
- SC minimize the number of used batteries.
[181] -Expand ESS lifetime Li-ion Battery – Isolated The study considers the SOC of both battery and SC to ensure long lifetime.
Minimize energy cost SC
19
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Table 14
General technical specifications of energy storage techniques [1,10,186,187].
Energy storage system Power Rating Discharge Energy density Wh/kg Energy cost Lifetime
€/KWh Efficiency
CAES and PHES are suitable for centered energy storage due to their electric power systems, i.e., generation, transmission, substations, dis
high energy storage capacity. The battery and hydrogen energy storage tribution, and final consumers. Some of the applications of ESS include
systems are perfect for distributed energy storage. Presently batteries are transmission system congestion decreasing, storing energy during off
the commonly used due to their scalability, versatility, cost- peaks for using during on peaks, voltage and frequency control, repa
effectiveness, and their main role in EVs. But several research projects ration for unpredictable emergencies like generation unit failure, and
are under process for increasing the efficiency of hydrogen energy providing a real-time balance between generation and load [139]. Using
storage system for making hydrogen a dated future ESS. ESSs in public utilities is a significant way to control the intermittent
nature of RE sources like wind and solar power [191]. By reducing
6. Applications of energy storage systems variations in the production of electricity, energy storage devices like
batteries and SCs can offer a reliable and high-quality power source
Energy storage is utilized for several applications like power peak [192]. By facilitating improved demand management and adjusting for
shaving, renewable energy, improved building energy systems, and fluctuations in frequency and voltage on the grid, they also contribute to
enhanced transportation. ESS can be classified based on its application lower energy costs. Authors in Ref. [193] represented some of these
[188]. applications such as increasing RE penetration, load leveling, frequency
regulation, and offering operating reserve. In Ref. [194], authors dis
cussed some of energy storage technologies used in grids and the re
6.1. General applications
quirements to decrease costs and enhance performance for these
technologies to expand their market penetration. Some applications of
There are many general applications for ESS such as solar water
ESS application are summerized in Table 15.
heating, solar air heating, solar cooking, solar greenhouses, space
heating and cooling in buildings, off-peak electricity storage, and waste
heat recovery [189]. Also, applications of FES are presented in
6.3. Renewable energy utilization
Ref. [190], involve uses in a variety of industries and frequency regu
lation due to its advantages, including its high energy storage density,
The greater the use of renewable energy sources, the greater the need
quick charging and discharging times, and extended service life.
of energy storage sources to store energy in off-peak times and use it at
on-peak ones, in addition to the continuous intermittent in the renew
6.2. Energy utilities able energy sources [7]. Authors in Ref. [197], recommended that ESS
that are scalable, resilient, and minimal maintenance, such as, FES, SC,
Energy storage posted at any of the five main subsystems in the SMES and most batteries, may be appropriate for distributed renewable
Table 15
ESS applications [195,196].
ESS Application requirements PHS CAES BESS FES SC SMES
20
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
energy. Technologies that combine a solar energy source with ES are Table 16
reviewed in many papers [198,199]. [101,200] recommended that FES New trends in energy storage systems.
are favorable devices for combination with wind and PV systems unlike Topic Research directions Some published
to BESS as they are fast response. papers
21
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
8. Conclusion [7] T.S. Babu, K.R. Vasudevan, V.K. Ramachandaramurthy, S.B. Sani, S. Chemud, R.
M. Lajim, A comprehensive review of hybrid energy storage systems: converter
Topologies, control strategies and future prospects, IEEE Access 8 (2020)
The energy storage technology is well covered in this review. The use 148702–148721, [Link]
of ESS is crucial for improving system stability, boosting penetration of [8] F. Mohamad, J. Teh, C.M. Lai, L.R. Chen, Development of energy storage systems
renewable energy, and conserving energy. Electricity storage systems for power network reliability: a review, Energies 11 (9) (2018), [Link]
10.3390/en11092278.
come in a variety of forms, such as mechanical, chemical, electrical, and [9] K.P. Kampouris, V. Drosou, C. Karytsas, M. Karagiorgas, Energy storage systems
electrochemical ones. In order to improve performance, increase life review and case study in the residential sector, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.
expectancy, and save costs, HESS is created by combining multiple ESS 410 (1) (2020), [Link]
[10] N.N. Eklas Hossain, Hossain Mansur Resalat Faruque, Naeem Mohammad,
types. Different HESS combinations are [Link] energy storage A comprehensive review on energy storage systems: types, comparison, current
technology is covered in this review. The use of ESS is crucial for scenario, applications, barriers, and potential solutions, policies, and future
improving system stability, boosting penetration of renewable energy, prospects, Energies 13 (3651) (2020) 1–129.
[11] A.G. Olabi, C. Onumaegbu, T. Wilberforce, M. Ramadan, M.A. Abdelkareem, A.
and conserving energy. Electricity storage systems (ESSs) come in a H. Al – Alami, Critical review of energy storage systems, Energy 214 (2021)
variety of forms, such as mechanical, chemical, electrical, and electro 118987, [Link]
chemical ones. In order to improve performance, increase life expec [12] A.Z. AL Shaqsi, K. Sopian, A. Al-Hinai, Review of energy storage services,
applications, limitations, and benefits, Energy Rep. 6 (2020) 288–306, https://
tancy, and save costs, HESS is created by combining multiple ESS types. [Link]/10.1016/[Link].2020.07.028.
Different HESS combinations are available. [13] M.A. Hannan, M. Faisal, P. Jern Ker, R.A. Begum, Z.Y. Dong, C. Zhang, Review of
Hybrid electric vehicles, fuel cell-powered electric vehicles, grid-tied optimal methods and algorithms for sizing energy storage systems to achieve
decarbonization in microgrid applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 131
HESS, large-scale wind and solar farms, and several other applications
(2020), [Link]
are just a few of the many uses for HESSs. This article discusses several [14] M.S. Guney, Y. Tepe, Classification and assessment of energy storage systems,
challenges to integrating energy-storage systems, including battery Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 75 (October 2016) (2017) 1187–1197, [Link]
deterioration, inefficient energy operation, ESS sizing and allocation, org/10.1016/[Link].2016.11.102.
[15] F. Nadeem, S.M.S. Hussain, P.K. Tiwari, A.K. Goswami, T.S. Ustun, Comparative
and financial feasibility. It is essential to choose the ESS that is most review of energy storage systems, their roles, and impacts on future power
practical for each application. FES, SMES, SC, and certain batteries are systems, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 4555–4585, [Link]
strongly advised for applications requiring quick response, such as fre ACCESS.2018.2888497.
[16] M. Aneke, M. Wang, Energy storage technologies and real life applications – a
quency modulation, reactive power support, seamless transmission, and state of the art review, Appl. Energy 179 (2016), [Link]
power quality enhancement. On the other hand, hourly level response apenergy.2016.06.097.
time applications like capacity unit and energy time shift can make use [17] T. Kousksou, P. Bruel, A. Jamil, T. El Rhafiki, Y. Zeraouli, Energy storage:
applications and challenges, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 120 (PART A) (2014)
of PHES and CAES. Additionally, new developments in energy storage 59–80, [Link]
systems (ESS) such as geothermal heat pumps, microgrids, SCs, methane [18] Z. Zhang, et al., A review of technologies and applications on versatile energy
generation, thermal energy storage, lithium sulfur batteries, electric storage systems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 148 (2021), [Link]
10.1016/[Link].2021.111263.
vehicles, and hydrogen storage are covered in this [Link] to [19] S. Saranya, B. Saravanan, Effect of emission in SMES based unit commitment
ESS’s high prominence as a study area, there are numerous search di using modified Henry gas solubility optimization, J. Energy Storage 29 (March)
rections listed for each topic. (2020) 101380, [Link]
[20] I. Kouache, M. Sebaa, M. Bey, T. Allaoui, M. Denai, A new approach to demand
response in a microgrid based on coordination control between smart meter and
Declaration of competing interest distributed superconducting magnetic energy storage unit, J. Energy Storage 32
(September) (2020) 101748, [Link]
[21] A. Grama, L. Grama, D. Petreuş, C. Rusu, Supercapacitor modelling using
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial experimental measurements, in: 2009 Int. Symp. Signals, Circuits Syst. ISSCS
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence 2009, 2009, pp. 1–3, [Link]
the work reported in this paper. [22] B. Zakeri, S. Syri, Electrical energy storage systems: a comparative life cycle cost
analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42 (2015) 569–596, [Link]
10.1016/[Link].2014.10.011.
Data availability [23] M. Parchomiuk, K. Zymmer, A. Domino, Security systems of power converter
interface with superconducting magnetic energy storage for electric power
distribution, in: 2018 Prog. Appl. Electr. Eng. PAEE 2018, 2018, [Link]
Data will be made available on request. 10.1109/PAEE.2018.8441061.
[24] Z. Nie, X. Xiao, Q. Kang, R. Aggarwal, H. Zhang, W. Yuan, SMES-Battery energy
Acknowledgments storage system for conditioning outputs from direct drive linear wave energy
converters, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23 (3) (2013), [Link]
10.1109/TASC.2013.2246852.
The research has been partially supported by the Faculty of Infor [25] M.E. Shaaban, A.E. Hassan, D.A. Mansour, Using SMES for Voltage Stabilization
matics and Management UHK excellence project “Methodological per of PMSG Based Wind Energy System, 2020, pp. 181–185.
[26] Y.B. Adediji, A.M. Adeyinka, D.I. Yahya, O. V Mbelu, A review of energy storage
spectives on modeling and simulation of hard and soft systems”. applications of lead-free BaTiO3-based dielectric ceramic capacitors A review of
energy storage applications of lead-free BaTiO 3 -based dielectric ceramic
References capacitors, Energy, Ecol. Environ. (June) (2023), [Link]
s40974-023-00286-5.
[27] R. Soman, et al., Preliminary investigation on economic aspects of
[1] S. Ould Amrouche, D. Rekioua, T. Rekioua, S. Bacha, Overview of energy storage
superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) systems and high-temperature
in renewable energy systems, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 (45) (2016)
superconducting (HTS) transformers, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28 (4) (2018)
20914–20927, [Link]
1–5, [Link]
[2] S. Koohi-Fayegh, M.A. Rosen, A review of energy storage types, applications and
[28] M.R. Jannesar, A. Sedighi, M. Savaghebi, J.M. Guerrero, Optimal placement,
recent developments, J. Energy Storage 27 (November 2019) (2020) 101047,
sizing, and daily charge/discharge of battery energy storage in low voltage
[Link]
distribution network with high photovoltaic penetration, Appl. Energy 226 (May)
[3] N. Florin, E. Dominish, Sustainability evaluation of energy storage technologies,
(2018) 957–966, [Link]
Inst. Sustain. Futur. 78 (2017).
[29] N.B.J. G, O. Husev, N. Manonmani, Overview of Energy Storage Technologies for
[4] A.Z. AL Shaqsi, K. Sopian, A. Al-Hinai, Review of energy storage services,
Renewable Energy, September 2015, 2019.
applications, limitations, and benefits, Energy Rep. 6 (xxxx) (2020) 288–306,
[30] T. Bocklisch, Hybrid energy storage systems for renewable energy applications,
[Link]
Energy Proc. 73 (2015) 103–111, [Link]
[5] A. Noori, M. Jafari Shahbazadeh, M. Eslami, Designing of wide-area damping
egypro.2015.07.582.
controller for stability improvement in a large-scale power system in presence of
[31] P.K. Maroti, S. Padmanaban, M.S. Bhaskar, V.K. Ramachandaramurthy,
wind farms and SMES compensator, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 119
F. Blaabjerg, The state-of-the-art of power electronics converters configurations in
(February) (2020) 105936, [Link]
electric vehicle technologies, Power Electron. Devices Components 1 (November
[6] G.B. Shrestha, P.A.J. Fonseka, Congestion-driven transmission expansion in
2021) (2022) 100001, [Link]
competitive power markets, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19 (3) (2004) 1658–1665,
[Link]
22
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
[32] M.A. Hannan, M.M. Hoque, A. Mohamed, A. Ayob, Review of energy storage [57] K. Bi, W. Yang, D. Xu, W. Yan, Dynamic SOC balance strategy for modular energy
systems for electric vehicle applications: issues and challenges, Renew. Sustain. storage system based on adaptive droop control, IEEE Access 8 (2020)
Energy Rev. 69 (December 2016) (2017) 771–789, [Link] 41418–41431, [Link]
rser.2016.11.171. [58] G. Wu, et al., Optimal control strategy for a wind power hybrid energy storage
[33] M.U. Mutarraf, Y. Guan, L. Xu, C.-L. Su, J.C. Vasquez, J.M. Guerrero, Electric cars, system considering output power amendment, J. Eng. 2019 (16) (2019)
ships, and their charging infrastructure – a comprehensive review, Sustain. 2732–2735, [Link]
Energy Technol. Assessments 52 (PB) (2022) 102177, [Link] [59] X.P. Chen, Y.D. Wang, Q.M. Wu, A bio-fuel power generation system with hybrid
seta.2022.102177. energy storage under a dynamic programming operation strategy, IEEE Access 7
[34] S. Verma, et al., A comprehensive review on energy storage in hybrid electric (2019) 64966–64977, [Link]
vehicle, J. Traffic Transport. Eng. 8 (5) (October 2021) 621–637. [60] G. Liu, J. Hu, G. Tian, L. Xu, S. Wang, Study on high voltage ride through control
[35] X. Lü, et al., Energy management of hybrid electric vehicles: a review of energy strategy of PMSG-based wind turbine generation system with SCESU, J. Eng.
optimization of fuel cell hybrid power system based on genetic algorithm, Energy 2019 (17) (2019) 4257–4260, [Link]
Convers. Manag. 205 (November 2019) (2020) 112474, [Link] [61] D. Sun, et al., Research on frequency inertia response control strategy of SCESS-
10.1016/[Link].2020.112474. DFIG system considering variable wind speed, J. Eng. 2019 (16) (2019)
[36] M. Shafiei, A. Ghasemi-Marzbali, Fast-charging station for electric vehicles, 2995–3001, [Link]
challenges and issues: a comprehensive review, J. Energy Storage 49 (February) [62] L. Wang, J. Guo, F. Ji, Energy management strategy for super capacitor energy
(2022) 104136, [Link] storage system based on phase shifted full bridge converter, in: Proc. - 2018 IEEE
[37] P. Ashkrof, G. Homem de Almeida Correia, B. van Arem, Analysis of the effect of Int. Power Electron. Appl. Conf. Expo, PEAC, 2018, pp. 1–6, [Link]
charging needs on battery electric vehicle drivers’ route choice behaviour: a case 10.1109/PEAC.2018.8590445.
study in The Netherlands, Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 78 (December [63] D. Zhang, C. Chen, Y. Ou, T. Zheng, W. Tang, Model predictive control of three-
2019) (2020) 102206, [Link] level bidirectional DC-DC converter based on super capacitor energy storage
[38] A. Awasthi, K. Venkitusamy, S. Padmanaban, R. Selvamuthukumaran, system, in: 2020 Int. Conf. Electr. Eng. ICEE 2020, 2020, pp. 19–23, [Link]
F. Blaabjerg, A.K. Singh, Optimal planning of electric vehicle charging station at org/10.1109/ICEE49691.2020.9249868.
the distribution system using hybrid optimization algorithm, Energy 133 (2017) [64] D.K. Mishra, T.K. Panigrahi, A. Mohanty, P.K. Ray, Effect of superconducting
70–78, [Link] magnetic energy storage on two agent deregulated power system under open
[39] Y. Lyu, A.R.M. Siddique, S.H. Majid, M. Biglarbegian, S.A. Gadsden, S. Mahmud, market, Mater. Today Proc. 21 (2020) 1919–1929, [Link]
Electric vehicle battery thermal management system with thermoelectric cooling, matpr.2020.01.276.
Energy Rep. 5 (2019) 822–827, [Link] [65] B. Yang, et al., Control of SMES systems in distribution networks with renewable
[40] X. Yang, Y. Zhang, A comprehensive review on electric vehicles integrated in energy integration: a perturbation estimation approach, Energy 202 (2020)
virtual power plants, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 48 (October) (2021) 117753, [Link]
101678, [Link] [66] O. Rahman, K.M. Muttaqi, D. Sutanto, High temperature superconducting devices
[41] Y. Wang, A. Biswas, R. Rodriguez, Z. Keshavarz-Motamed, A. Emadi, Hybrid and renewable energy resources in future power grids: a case study, IEEE Trans.
electric vehicle specific engines: state-of-the-art review, Energy Rep. 8 (2022) Appl. Supercond. 29 (2) (2019) 1–4, [Link]
832–851, [Link] TASC.2019.2895677.
[42] G. Wu, X. Zhang, Z. Dong, Powertrain architectures of electrified vehicles: review, [67] Z. Tan, Y. Zhai, F. Wang, Research on improving the operation stability of wind
classification and comparison, J. Franklin Inst. 352 (2) (2015) 425–448, https:// farms connected to power grid by using VSC-hvdc containing SMES, in: 2019
[Link]/10.1016/[Link].2014.04.018. IEEE PES Innov. Smart Grid Technol. Asia, ISGT, 2019, pp. 1873–1877, https://
[43] W. Enang, C. Bannister, Modelling and control of hybrid electric vehicles (A [Link]/10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2019.8881804, 2019.
comprehensive review), Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 74 (August 2016) (2017) [68] F. Simões, V.F. Pires, J. Murta-Pina, Assessment of using superconducting
1210–1239, [Link] magnetic energy storage for current harmonic compensation, in: Proc. - 2020 Int.
[44] D.D. Tran, M. Vafaeipour, M. El Baghdadi, R. Barrero, J. Van Mierlo, O. Hegazy, Young Eng. Forum, YEF-ECE 2020, 2020, pp. 73–77, [Link]
Thorough state-of-the-art analysis of electric and hybrid vehicle powertrains: YEF-ECE49388.2020.9171802.
topologies and integrated energy management strategies, Renew. Sustain. Energy [69] X.K. Tran, Y. Chen, G.T. Phan, D.H. Huynh, Optimal design for frequency
Rev. 119 (2020) 109596, [Link] fluctuation control system with SMES unit, in: 2020 4th Int. Conf. Robot. Autom.
[45] C. Liu, X. Pan, X. Zheng, Y. Yan, W. Li, An experimental study of a novel Sci. ICRAS 2020, 2020, pp. 50–54, [Link]
prototype for two-stage thermoelectric generator from vehicle exhaust, J. Energy ICRAS49812.2020.9135059.
Inst. 89 (2) (2016) 271–281, [Link] [70] E.M. Molla, C.C. Kuo, Voltage sag enhancement of grid connected hybrid PV-wind
[46] A. Biswas, P.G. Anselma, A. Rathore, A. Emadi, Effect of coordinated control on power system using battery and SMES based dynamic voltage restorer, IEEE
real-time optimal mode selection for multi-mode hybrid electric powertrain, Access 8 (2020) 130003–130013, [Link]
Appl. Energy 289 (February) (2021) 116695, [Link] ACCESS.2020.3009420.
apenergy.2021.116695. [71] J.X. Jin, R.H. Yang, R.T. Zhang, Y.J. Fan, Q. Xie, X.Y. Chen, Combined low
[47] X. Hu, X. Zhang, X. Tang, X. Lin, Model predictive control of hybrid electric voltage ride through and power smoothing control for DFIG/PMSG hybrid wind
vehicles for fuel economy, emission reductions, and inter-vehicle safety in car- energy conversion system employing a SMES-based AC-DC unified power quality
following scenarios, Energy 196 (2020) 117101, [Link] conditioner, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 128 (July 2020) (2021) 106733,
energy.2020.117101. [Link]
[48] P.G. Anselma, A. Biswas, G. Belingardi, A. Emadi, Rapid assessment of the fuel [72] E.A. Gouda, A. Abd-Alaziz, M. El-Saadawi, Design modeling, and control of multi-
economy capability of parallel and series-parallel hybrid electric vehicles, Appl. stage SMES integrated with PV system, J. Energy Storage 29 (March) (2020)
Energy 275 (June) (2020) 115319, [Link] 101399, [Link]
apenergy.2020.115319. [73] M. Abdel-Salam, A. Elnozahy, M. Elgamal, Minimum power loss based design of
[49] K. Valentine, J. Acquaviva, E.J. Foster, K.M. Zhang, Transmission network-based SMES as influenced by coil material, J. Energy Storage 30 (December 2019)
energy and environmental assessment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, J. Power (2020) 101461, [Link]
Sources 196 (6) (2011) 3378–3386, [Link] [74] Y. Zhang, X.F. Cheng, C. Yin, S. Cheng, A soft-switching bidirectional DC-DC
jpowsour.2010.11.110. converter for the battery super-capacitor hybrid energy storage system, IEEE
[50] R.A. Waraich, M.D. Galus, C. Dobler, M. Balmer, G. Andersson, K.W. Axhausen, Trans. Ind. Electron. 65 (10) (2018) 7856–7865, [Link]
Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and smart grids: investigations based on a TIE.2018.2798608.
microsimulation, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 28 (2013) 74–86, https:// [75] O. Salari, et al., in: Transactions on Power Electronics Reconfigurable Hybrid
[Link]/10.1016/[Link].2012.10.011. Energy Storage System for an Electric Vehicle DC/AC Inverter, 2020, [Link]
[51] Y. Zheng, S. Niu, Y. Shang, Z. Shao, L. Jian, Integrating plug-in electric vehicles org/10.1109/TPEL.2020.2993783 vol. 8993, no. c,.
into power grids: a comprehensive review on power interaction mode, scheduling [76] S. Ruddell, U.K. Madawala, D.J. Thrimawithana, Dynamic WPT system for EV
methodology and mathematical foundation, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 112 charging with integrated energy storage, IET Power Electron. 12 (10) (2019)
(May) (2019) 424–439, [Link] 2660–2668, [Link]
[52] F. Alfaverh, M. Denaï, Y. Sun, Optimal vehicle-to-grid control for supplementary [77] X. Xia, X. Zhao, H. Zeng, X. Zeng, A novel design of hybrid energy storage system
frequency regulation using deep reinforcement learning, Elec. Power Syst. Res. for electric vehicles, Chinese J. Electr. Eng. 4 (1) (2018) 45–51, [Link]
214 (PB) (2023) 108949, [Link] 10.23919/CJEE.2018.8327370.
[53] R.T. Disler, et al., Factors impairing the postural balance in COPD patients and its [78] M.M. Rayguru, S. Madichetty, S. Mishra, Battery Super-capacitor Hybrid System
influence upon activities of daily living, Eur. Respir. J. 15 (1) (2019). for Electrical Vehicle Transportation ’ S Systems – an Energy Integrated
[54] G.S. Thirunavukkarasu, et al., Role ofoptimization techniques in microgrid energy Approach, 2020, pp. 1–7, [Link]
management systems—a review, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 9 (PD) (2023) [79] Implementation of Fuzzy Logic for Modern E- Vehicles Using Super Capacitors
106420, [Link] and Li-Ion Battery, Icosec, 2020, pp. 1128–1132.
[55] S. Habib, M. Kamran, U. Rashid, Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology [80] A.K. Rohit, S. Rangnekar, An overview of energy storage and its importance in
and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networks - a review, Indian renewable energy sector: Part II – energy storage applications, benefits and
J. Power Sources 277 (2015) 205–214, [Link] market potential, J. Energy Storage 13 (2017) 447–456, [Link]
jpowsour.2018.12.020. 10.1016/[Link].2017.07.012.
[56] F. Knobloch, et al., Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in [81] K. Aseem, S. Selva Kumar, High temperature superconducting material based
59 world regions over time, Nat. Sustain. 3 (6) (2020) 437–447, [Link] energy storage for solar-wind hybrid generating systems for fluctuating power
10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7.
23
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
management, Mater. Today Proc. 42 (xxxx) (2020) 1122–1129, [Link] dynamic modelling, Appl. Energy 190 (2017), [Link]
10.1016/[Link].2020.12.493. apenergy.2016.12.118.
[82] A. Sánchez Muñoz, M. Garcia, M. Gerlich Reviewer, T. Rautiainen, “Overview of [109] D. Yacar, D.A. Tejada-Arango, S. Wogrin, Storage allocation and investment
Storage Technologies,”, 2016 645963. optimisation for transmission-constrained networks considering losses and high
[83] B. Dunn, H. Kamath, J.M. Tarascon, Electrical energy storage for the grid: a renewable penetration, IET Renew. Power Gener. 12 (16) (2018) 1949–1956,
battery of choices, Science 334 (6058) (2011) 928–935, [Link] [Link]
science.1212741. [110] M. Ghanaatian, S. Lotfifard, Control of flywheel energy storage systems in the
[84] P.K. Singh, Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicles, January 2019, 2020. presence of uncertainties, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 10 (1) (2019) 36–45,
[85] X. Luo, J. Wang, M. Dooner, J. Clarke, Overview of current development in [Link]
electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power [111] X. Xu, W. Hu, D. Cao, Q. Huang, C. Chen, Z. Chen, Optimized sizing of a
system operation, Appl. Energy 137 (2015) 511–536, [Link] standalone PV-wind-hydropower station with pumped-storage installation hybrid
apenergy.2014.09.081. energy system, Renew. Energy 147 (2020) 1418–1431, [Link]
[86] A. Bito, Overview of the sodium-sulfur battery for the IEEE stationary battery [Link].2019.09.099.
committee, in: 2005 IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen. Meet vol. 2, 2005, [112] A. Panda, U. Mishra, K.B. Aviso, Optimizing hybrid power systems with
pp. 1232–1235, [Link] compressed air energy storage, Energy 205 (2020) 117962, [Link]
[87] F. Díaz-González, A. Sumper, O. Gomis-Bellmunt, R. Villafáfila-Robles, A review 10.1016/[Link].2020.117962.
of energy storage technologies for wind power applications, Renew. Sustain. [113] M.A. Mirzaei, et al., Integrated energy hub system based on power-to-gas and
Energy Rev. 16 (4) (2012) 2154–2171, [Link] compressed air energy storage technologies in the presence of multiple shiftable
rser.2012.01.029. loads, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 14 (13) (2020) 2510–2519, [Link]
[88] A.R. Sparacino, G.F. Reed, R.J. Kerestes, B.M. Grainger, Z.T. Smith, Survey of 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.1163.
Battery Energy Storage Systems and Modeling Techniques, 2012, [Link] [114] I. Calero, C.A. Canizares, K. Bhattacharya, Implementation of transient stability
10.1109/PESGM.2012.6345071. model of compressed air energy storage systems, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 35 (6)
[89] P. Leung, X. Li, C. Ponce De León, L. Berlouis, C.T.J. Low, F.C. Walsh, Progress in (2020) 4734–4744, [Link]
redox flow batteries, remaining challenges and their applications in energy [115] S. Bhattarai, R. Karki, P. Piya, Reliability modelling of compressed air energy
storage, RSC Adv. 2 (27) (2012) 10125–10156, [Link] storage for adequacy assessment of wind integrated power system, IET Gener.
c2ra21342g. Transm. Distrib. 13 (19) (2019) 4443–4450, [Link]
[90] H. Zhang, M.Y. Chow, Comprehensive dynamic battery modeling for PHEV gtd.2019.0179.
applications, in: IEEE PES Gen. Meet. PES 2010, 2010, pp. 1–6, [Link] [116] B.S. Pali, S. Vadhera, An innovative continuous power generation system
10.1109/PES.2010.5590108. comprising of wind energy along with pumped - hydro storage and open well,
[91] J. Sardi, N. Mithulananthan, M. Gallagher, D.Q. Hung, Multiple community IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy (c) (2018) 1, [Link]
energy storage planning in distribution networks using a cost-benefit analysis, TSTE.2018.2886705.
Appl. Energy 190 (2017) 453–463, [Link] [117] P.E.I. Xia, C. Deng, Y. Chen, W. Yao, MILP based robust short-term scheduling for
apenergy.2016.12.144. wind – thermal – hydro power system with pumped hydro energy storage, IEEE
[92] A.S.A. Awad, T.H.M. El-Fouly, M.M.A. Salama, Optimal ESS allocation for load Access 7 (2019) 30261–30275, [Link]
management application, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30 (1) (2015) 327–336, [118] L. Chen, J. Wang, Z. Sun, T. Huang, F. Wu, Smoothing photovoltaic power
[Link] fluctuations for cascade hydro-PV-pumped storage generation system based on a
[93] A. Mohamed Abd El Motaleb, S. Kazim Bekdache, L.A. Barrios, Optimal sizing for fuzzy CEEMDAN, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 172718–172727, [Link]
a hybrid power system with wind/energy storage based in stochastic 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2955569.
environment, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59 (2016) 1149–1158, [Link] [119] S. Dhundhara, Y.P. Verma, Application of micro pump hydro energy storage for
org/10.1016/[Link].2015.12.267. reliable operation of microgrid system, IET Renew. Power Gener. 14 (8) (2020)
[94] D. Miao, S. Hossain, Improved gray wolf optimization algorithm for solving 1368–1378, [Link]
placement and sizing of electrical energy storage system in micro-grids, ISA [120] E. Muh, F. Tabet, Comparative analysis of hybrid renewable energy systems for
Trans. 102 (2020) 376–387, [Link] off-grid applications in Southern Cameroons, Renew. Energy 135 (2019) 41–54,
[95] D.L. Rodrigues, X. Ye, X. Xia, B. Zhu, Battery energy storage sizing optimisation [Link]
for different ownership structures in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community, [121] E. Borri, G. Zsembinszki, L.F. Cabeza, Recent developments of thermal energy
Appl. Energy 262 (January) (2020) 114498, [Link] storage applications in the built environment: a bibliometric analysis and
apenergy.2020.114498. systematic review, Appl. Therm. Eng. 189 (December 2020) (2021) 116666,
[96] A. Vieira Pombo, J. Murta-Pina, V. Fernão Pires, Multiobjective formulation of [Link]
the integration of storage systems within distribution networks for improving [122] G. Lodge, K. Henderson, United States of America, Towar. Ind. Democr. Eur.
reliability, Elec. Power Syst. Res. 148 (2017) 87–96, [Link] Japan United States (4028) (2017) 240–282, [Link]
epsr.2017.03.012. db97e7af-en.
[97] A. Giannitrapani, S. Paoletti, A. Vicino, D. Zarrilli, Optimal allocation of energy [123] J. Lizana, R. Chacartegui, A. Barrios-Padura, J.M. Valverde, Advances in thermal
storage systems for voltage control in LV distribution networks, IEEE Trans. Smart energy storage materials and their applications towards zero energy buildings: a
Grid 8 (6) (2017) 2859–2870, [Link] critical review, Appl. Energy 203 (2017) 219–239, [Link]
[98] P. Fortenbacher, A. Ulbig, G. Andersson, Optimal placement and sizing of apenergy.2017.06.008.
distributed battery storage in low voltage grids using receding horizon control [124] E. Oró, A. de Gracia, A. Castell, M.M. Farid, L.F. Cabeza, Review on phase change
strategies, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33 (3) (2018) 2383–2394, [Link] materials (PCMs) for cold thermal energy storage applications, Appl. Energy 99
10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2746261. (2012) 513–533, [Link]
[99] S. Sanajaoba, E. Fernandez, Maiden application of Cuckoo Search algorithm for [125] M.M. Farid, A.M. Khudhair, S.A.K. Razack, S. Al-Hallaj, A review on phase change
optimal sizing of a remote hybrid renewable energy System, Renew. Energy 96 energy storage: materials and applications, Energy Convers. Manag. 45 (2004)
(2016) 1–10, [Link] 9–10, [Link]
[100] S. Choudhury, Flywheel energy storage systems: a critical review on technologies, [126] G. Alva, Y. Lin, G. Fang, An overview of thermal energy storage systems, Energy
applications, and future prospects, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 31 (9) (2021) 144 (2018) 341–378, [Link]
1–26, [Link] [127] B. Zalba, J.M. Marín, L.F. Cabeza, H. Mehling, Review on thermal energy storage
[101] S.M. Mousavi G, F. Faraji, A. Majazi, K. Al-Haddad, A comprehensive review of with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications, Appl.
flywheel energy storage system technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67 Therm. Eng. 23 (3) (2003), [Link]
(2017) 477–490, [Link] [128] G. Zsembinszki, A.G. Fernández, L.F. Cabeza, Selection of the appropriate phase
[102] M.E. Amiryar, K.R. Pullen, A review of flywheel energy storage system change material for two innovative compact energy storage systems in residential
technologies and their applications, Appl. Sci. 7 (3) (2017), [Link] buildings, Appl. Sci. 10 (6) (2020), [Link]
10.3390/app7030286. [129] Y. Lin, Y. Jia, G. Alva, G. Fang, Review on thermal conductivity enhancement,
[103] O. Achkari, A.E.L. Fadar, Renewable Energy Storage Technologies - A Review, 35, thermal properties and applications of phase change materials in thermal energy
2018, pp. 69–79. storage, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82 (Feb. 2018) 2730–2742, [Link]
[104] R. Madlener, J. Latz, Economics of centralized and decentralized compressed air 10.1016/[Link].2017.10.002.
energy storage for enhanced grid integration of wind power, Appl. Energy 101 [130] Z. Szabo, et al., Effects of Repeated Heating on Fatty Acid Composition of Plant-
(2013) 299–309, [Link] Based Cooking Oils, 2022.
[105] S. Sabihuddin, A.E. Kiprakis, M. Mueller, A numerical and graphical review of [131] J. Park, S.H. Choi, S.W. Karng, Cascaded latent thermal energy storage using a
energy storage technologies, Energies 8 (1) (2015) 172–216, [Link] charging control method, Energy 215 (2021) 119166, [Link]
10.3390/en8010172. energy.2020.119166.
[106] P. Breeze, Power system energy storage technologies, Power Gener. Technol. [132] Z. Ling, F. Wang, X. Fang, X. Gao, Z. Zhang, A hybrid thermal management system
(2019) 219–249, [Link] for lithium ion batteries combining phase change materials with forced-air
[107] C.A. Cruickshank, C. Baldwin, Sensible thermal energy storage: diurnal and cooling, Appl. Energy 148 (2015) 403–409, [Link]
seasonal, Storing Energy (Jan. 2022) 419–441, [Link] apenergy.2015.03.080.
12-824510-1.00018-0. [133] P. Goli, S. Legedza, A. Dhar, R. Salgado, J. Renteria, A.A. Balandin, Graphene-
[108] A. Sciacovelli, A. Vecchi, Y. Ding, Liquid air energy storage (LAES) with packed enhanced hybrid phase change materials for thermal management of Li-ion
bed cold thermal storage – from component to system level performance through batteries, J. Power Sources 248 (2014) 37–43, [Link]
jpowsour.2013.08.135.
24
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
[134] Z. Ma, M.J. Li, K.M. Zhang, F. Yuan, Novel designs of hybrid thermal energy projects, Renew. Energy 39 (1) (2012) 149–153, [Link]
storage system and operation strategies for concentrated solar power plant, renene.2011.07.041.
Energy 216 (2021) 119281, [Link] [159] L. Barelli, et al., Comparative analysis of AC and DC bus configurations for
[135] S. Puschnigg, J. Lindorfer, S. Moser, T. Kienberger, Techno-economic aspects of flywheel-battery HESS integration in residential micro-grids, Energy 204 (2020),
increasing primary energy efficiency in industrial branches using thermal energy [Link]
storage, J. Energy Storage 36 (November 2020) (2021) 102344, [Link] [160] P. Jiang, Z.J. Zhao, H.J. Lv, Optimal load tracking control of expansion generation
10.1016/[Link].2021.102344. with super capacitor in compressed air energy storage system, Chinese Control
[136] H. Liu, R. Zhai, J. Fu, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, Optimization study of thermal-storage Conf. CCC 2016-Augus (2016) 8754–8758, [Link]
PV-CSP integrated system based on GA-PSO algorithm, Sol. Energy 184 (April) ChiCC.2016.7554756.
(2019) 391–409, [Link] [161] S. Lemofouet, A. Rufer, Hybrid energy storage system based on compressed air
[137] H. Wang, A. Gaillard, D. Hissel, A review of DC/DC converter-based and super-capacitors with Maximum Efficiency Point Tracking (MEPT), IEEJ
electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for fuel cell electric vehicles, Renew. Trans. Ind. Appl. 126 (7) (2006) 911–920, [Link]
Energy 141 (2019), [Link] ieejias.126.911.
[138] J. Hwang, K. Maharjan, H.J. Cho, A review of hydrogen utilization in power [162] K.M. Tan, T.S. Babu, V.K. Ramachandaramurthy, P. Kasinathan, S.G. Solanki, S.
generation and transportation sectors: achievements and future challenges, Int. J. K. Raveendran, Empowering smart grid: a comprehensive review of energy
Hydrogen Energy 48 (74) (2023) 28629–28648, [Link] storage technology and application with renewable energy integration, J. Energy
ijhydene.2023.04.024. Storage 39 (2021), [Link]
[139] S. Yu, T.J. Mays, R.W. Dunn, A new methodology for designing hydrogen energy [163] A.Y. Ali, A. Basit, T. Ahmad, A. Qamar, J. Iqbal, Optimizing coordinated control
storage in wind power systems to balance generation and demand, 1st Int. Conf. of distributed energy storage system in microgrid to improve battery life, Comput.
Sustain. Power Gener. Supply, SUPERGEN ’09 (2009) 1–6, [Link] Electr. Eng. 86 (2020), [Link]
10.1109/SUPERGEN.2009.5348061. [164] Z. Afshar, H. Rahmanei, I. Bhogaraju, M. Farasat, SOC-Aware primary frequency
[140] M. AlShafi, Y. Bicer, Thermodynamic performance comparison of various energy control of low-inertia power systems with battery energy storage, in: 2023 IEEE
storage systems from source-to-electricity for renewable energy resources, Energy Texas Power Energy Conf. TPEC 2023, 2023, [Link]
219 (2021) 119626, [Link] TPEC56611.2023.10078647. February.
[141] A. Demirbas, Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel [165] Y. Qian, Y. Xie, Z. Lin, Y. Wan, Y.A. Shamash, Distributed dynamic event-
projections, Energy Convers. Manag. 49 (8) (2008) 2106–2116, [Link] triggered communication mechanisms for dynamic average consensus, Proc. IEEE
10.1016/[Link].2008.02.020. Conf. Decis. Control (2023) 3890–3895, [Link]
[142] M.Y. Haller, D. Carbonell, M. Dudita, D. Zenhäusern, A. Häberle, Seasonal energy CDC49753.2023.10384293. Cdc.
storage in aluminium for 100 percent solar heat and electricity supply, Energy [166] Q. Deng, D. Qiu, Z. Xie, B. Zhang, Y. Chen, Online SOC estimation of
Convers. Manag. X 5 (September) (2020) 100017, [Link] supercapacitor energy storage system based on fractional-order model, IEEE
ecmx.2019.100017. Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72 (2023) 1–10, [Link]
[143] W. Zhang, A. Maleki, M.A. Rosen, J. Liu, Sizing a stand-alone solar-wind- TIM.2023.3280524.
hydrogen energy system using weather forecasting and a hybrid search [167] B. Yang, J. Wang, Y. Chen, D. Li, C. Zeng, Y. Chen, Optimal sizing and placement
optimization algorithm, Energy Convers. Manag. 180 (May 2018) (2019) of energy storage system in power grids : a state-of-the-art one-stop handbook,
609–621, [Link] J. Energy Storage 32 (May) (2020) 101814, [Link]
[144] W. Zhang, A. Maleki, M.A. Rosen, J. Liu, Optimization with a simulated annealing est.2020.101814.
algorithm of a hybrid system for renewable energy including battery and [168] S. Karrari, N. Ludwig, G. De Carne, S. Member, M. Noe, Sizing of hybrid energy
hydrogen storage, Energy 163 (2018) 191–207, [Link] storage systems using recurring daily patterns, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 13 (4)
energy.2018.08.112. (2022) 3290–3300, [Link]
[145] M. Jamshidi, A. Askarzadeh, Techno-economic analysis and size optimization of [169] Y. Zhang, A. Anvari-Moghaddam, S. Peyghami, T. Dragicevic, Y. Li, F. Blaabjerg,
an off-grid hybrid photovoltaic, fuel cell and diesel generator system, Sustain. Optimal sizing of behind-the-meter BESS for providing stackable services, in:
Cities Soc. 44 (September 2018) (2019) 310–320, [Link] 2022 IEEE 13th Int. Symp. Power Electron. Distrib. Gener. Syst. PEDG 2022,
scs.2018.10.021. 2022, [Link]
[146] M.R. Mozafar, M.H. Moradi, M.H. Amini, A simultaneous approach for optimal [170] S. Kichou, T. Markvart, P. Wolf, S. Silvestre, A. Chouder, A simple and effective
allocation of renewable energy sources and electric vehicle charging stations in methodology for sizing electrical energy storage (EES) systems based on energy
smart grids based on improved GA-PSO algorithm, Sustain. Cities Soc. 32 (July) balance, J. Energy Storage 49 (November 2021) (2022) 104085, [Link]
(2017) 627–637, [Link] 10.1016/[Link].2022.104085.
[147] J. Yan, M. Menghwar, E. Asghar, M. Kumar Panjwani, Y. Liu, Real-time energy [171] D. Wang, S. Jiang, J. Xue, S. Wen, M. Zhu, Optimal Allocation of Energy Storage
management for a smart-community microgrid with battery swapping and Systems Participating in Frequency Regulation Markets, IET, 2022, [Link]
renewables, Appl. Energy 238 (February) (2019) 180–194, [Link] org/10.1049/icp.2022.2138.
10.1016/[Link].2018.12.078. [172] S. Mohanty, Optimal energy storage allocation in smart distribution systems : a
[148] L. Valverde, F.J. Pino, J. Guerra, F. Rosa, Definition, analysis and experimental review optimal energy storage allocation in smart distribution systems, A Review
investigation of operation modes in hydrogen-renewable-based power plants (2021), [Link] October.
incorporating hybrid energy storage, Energy Convers. Manag. 113 (2016) [173] A. Rathore, N.P. Patidar, Optimal sizing and allocation of renewable based
290–311, [Link] distribution generation with gravity energy storage considering stochastic nature
[149] J.P. Torreglosa, P. García-Triviño, L.M. Fernández-Ramirez, F. Jurado, Control using particle swarm optimization in radial distribution network, J. Energy
based on techno-economic optimization of renewable hybrid energy system for Storage 35 (January) (2021) 102282, [Link]
stand-alone applications, Expert Syst. Appl. 51 (2016) 59–75, [Link] est.2021.102282.
10.1016/[Link].2015.12.038. [174] W. Wu, An energy storage location method with comprehensive sensitivity of
[150] A. Serpi, M. Porru, A. Damiano, A novel highly integrated hybrid energy storage timing voltage, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2301 (1) (2022), [Link]
system for electric propulsion and smart grid applications, Adv. Energy Storage 1742-6596/2301/1/012017.
Technol. (May, 2018), [Link] [175] M. Stecca, L.R. Elizondo, T.B. Soeiro, P. Bauer, Energy storage sizing and location
[151] A. Etxeberria, I. Vechiu, H. Camblong, J.M. Vinassa, Hybrid Energy Storage in distribution networks considering overall grid performance, in: IEEE Power
Systems for Renewable Energy Sources Integration in Microgrids: A Review, Energy Soc. Gen. Meet, 2020-August, 2020, [Link]
2010, [Link] PESGM41954.2020.9281432.
[152] H.F. Jamahori, H.A. Rahman, Hybrid energy storage system for life cycle [176] J.C. Hernández, F. Sanchez-Sutil, F.J. Muñoz-Rodríguez, Design criteria for the
improvement, in: 2017 IEEE Conf. Energy Conversion, CENCON 2017 2018- optimal sizing of a hybrid energy storage system in PV household-prosumers to
Janua, 2017, pp. 196–200, [Link] maximize self-consumption and self-sufficiency, Energy 186 (2019), [Link]
October 2017. org/10.1016/[Link].2019.07.157.
[153] A. Huang, H. Bai, X. Zhang, Q. Cheng, Z. Lin, T. Xia, Hybrid Energy Storage [177] A.S. Jacob, R. Banerjee, P.C. Ghosh, Sizing of hybrid energy storage system for a
System Planning Method of DC Distribution Network Based on Energy Storage PV based microgrid through design space approach, Appl. Energy 212 (November
Battery and Super Capacitor, 2020, pp. 369–374. 2017) (2018) 640–653, [Link]
[154] G. Subramanian, J. Peter, Integrated Li-Ion Battery and Super Capacitor Based [178] B. Li, R. Roche, A. Miraoui, Microgrid sizing with combined evolutionary
Hybrid Energy Storage System for Electric Vehicles, 2020, pp. 1–5. algorithm and MILP unit commitment, Appl. Energy 188 (2017) 547–562,
[155] L. Chen, H. Chen, Y. Li, G. Li, SMES-battery energy storage system for the [Link]
stabilization of a photovoltaic-based microgrid 28 (4) (2018). [179] S. Bae, S.U. Jeon, J.W. Park, A study on optimal sizing and control for hybrid
[156] B. Yang, et al., Design and implementation of Battery/SMES hybrid energy energy storage system with SMES and battery, IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (30) (2015)
storage systems used in electric vehicles : a nonlinear robust fractional-order 507–511, [Link]
control approach, Energy 191 (2020) 116510, [Link] [180] A. Abbassi, M.A. Dami, M. Jemli, A statistical approach for hybrid energy storage
energy.2019.116510. system sizing based on capacity distributions in an autonomous PV/Wind power
[157] J. Hou, J. Sun, H. Hofmann, Control development and performance evaluation for generation system, Renew. Energy 103 (2017) 81–93, [Link]
battery/flywheel hybrid energy storage solutions to mitigate load fluctuations in renene.2016.11.024.
all-electric ship propulsion systems, Appl. Energy 212 (October 2017) (2018) [181] P.N.D. Premadasa, D.P. Chandima, An innovative approach of optimizing size and
919–930, [Link] cost of hybrid energy storage system with state of charge regulation for stand-
[158] G.N. Prodromidis, F.A. Coutelieris, Simulations of economical and technical alone direct current microgrids, J. Energy Storage 32 (January) (2020) 101703,
feasibility of battery and flywheel hybrid energy storage systems in autonomous [Link]
25
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
[182] M.M.A. Khan, R. Saidur, F.A. Al-Sulaiman, A review for phase change materials Syst. 105 (August 2018) (2019) 46–58, [Link]
(PCMs) in solar absorption refrigeration systems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 76 ijepes.2018.08.001.
(2017), [Link] [209] Y. Huang, K.M. Kockelman, Electric vehicle charging station locations: elastic
[183] Y. Wu, T. Zhang, K. Zhong, L. Wang, C. Xu, R. Xu, Optimal planning of energy demand, station congestion, and network equilibrium, Transport. Res. Transport
storage technologies considering thirteen demand scenarios from the perspective Environ. 78 (October 2019) (2020) 102179, [Link]
of electricity Grid: a Three-Stage framework, Energy Convers. Manag. 229 (2020) trd.2019.11.008.
(2021) 113789, [Link] December. [210] M. Huang, B. Xiang, J. Peng, L. Zhang, Optimal configuration method for EV
[184] M. Jarnut, S. Wermiński, B. Waśkowicz, Comparative analysis of selected energy charging station in distribution network considering user adjustment under V2G
storage technologies for prosumer-owned microgrids, Renew. Sustain. Energy mode, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 784 (1) (2021), [Link]
Rev. 74 (2017), [Link] 10.1088/1755-1315/784/1/012013.
[185] C. Del Pero, N. Aste, H. Paksoy, F. Haghighat, S. Grillo, F. Leonforte, Energy [211] R. Iacobucci, B. McLellan, T. Tezuka, Optimization of shared autonomous electric
storage key performance indicators for building application, Sustain. Cities Soc. vehicles operations with charge scheduling and vehicle-to-grid, Transp. Res. Part
40 (February) (2018) 54–65, [Link] C Emerg. Technol. 100 (January) (2019) 34–52, [Link]
[186] C. Zhang, C. Chen, D. Streimikiene, T. Balezentis, Intuitionistic fuzzy trc.2019.01.011.
MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria assessment of the energy storage [212] S. Karakatič, Optimizing nonlinear charging times of electric vehicle routing with
technologies, Appl. Soft Comput. J. 79 (May) (2019) 410–423, [Link] genetic algorithm, Expert Syst. Appl. 164 (May 2020) (2021) 114039, [Link]
10.1016/[Link].2019.04.008. org/10.1016/[Link].2020.114039.
[187] K. Thanapalan, E. Constant, Overview of energy storage technologies for excess [213] T. Erdelić, T. Carić, Goods delivery with electric vehicles: electric vehicle routing
renewable energy production, in: WMSCI 2020 - 24th World Multi-Conference optimization with time windows and partial or full recharge, Energies 15 (1)
Syst. Cybern. Informatics, Proc., vol. 2, 2020, pp. 91–95. Lv. (2022), [Link]
[188] F. Baumgarte, G. Glenk, A. Rieger, Business models and profitability of energy [214] M.O. Metais, O. Jouini, Y. Perez, J. Berrada, E. Suomalainen, Too much or not
storage, iScience 23 (10) (2020), [Link] enough? Planning electric vehicle charging infrastructure: a review of modeling
[189] H. Nazir, et al., Recent developments in phase change materials for energy storage options, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 153 (September 2021) (2022) 111719,
applications: a review, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 129 (2019) 491–523, [Link] [Link]
org/10.1016/[Link].2018.09.126. [215] Z. Yi, X.C. Liu, R. Wei, Electric vehicle demand estimation and charging station
[190] J. Feng, Structure and application of flywheel energy storage-A simple allocation using urban informatics, Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 106 (April)
perspective, Acad. J. Sci. Technol. 3 (3) (2022) 42–45, [Link] (2022) 103264, [Link]
ajst.v3i3.2540. [216] Y. Alwesabi, F. Avishan, İ. Yanıkoğlu, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, Robust strategic planning
[191] J.A. Carr, J.C. Balda, H.A. Mantooth, A survey of systems to integrate distributed of dynamic wireless charging infrastructure for electric buses, Appl. Energy 307
energy resources and energy storage on the utility grid, in: 2008 IEEE Energy (November 2021) (2022), [Link]
2030 Conf. ENERGY 2008, 2008, [Link] [217] J. Shi, H.O. Gao, Efficient energy management of wireless charging roads with
ENERGY.2008.4781043. November. energy storage for coupled transportation–power systems, Appl. Energy 323
[192] Y. Zhang, Z. Jiang, X. Yu, Control strategies for battery/supercapacitor hybrid (February) (2022) 119619, [Link]
energy storage systems, in: 2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conf. ENERGY 2008, 2008, [218] G. Hiermann, R.F. Hartl, J. Puchinger, T. Vidal, Routing a mix of conventional,
pp. 5–10, [Link] plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicles, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272 (1) (2019) 235–248,
[193] S. Koohi-Kamali, V.V. Tyagi, N.A. Rahim, N.L. Panwar, H. Mokhlis, Emergence of [Link]
energy storage technologies as the solution for reliable operation of smart power [219] F. He, R. Bo, C. Hu, X. Meng, W. Gao, Employing spiral fins to improve the
systems: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25 (2013) 135–165, [Link] thermal performance of phase-change materials in shell-tube latent heat storage
org/10.1016/[Link].2013.03.056. units, Renew. Energy 203 (December 2022) (2023) 518–528, [Link]
[194] Y. Chiang, Electrochemical Energy Storage for the Grid, World, 2010. 10.1016/[Link].2022.12.091.
[195] A. Alhamali, M.E. Farrag, G. Bevan, D.M. Hepburn, Review of Energy Storage [220] Z. Cheng, G. Chang, B. Xue, L. Xie, Q. Zheng, Hierarchical Ni-plated melamine
Systems in electric grid and their potential in distribution networks, in: 2016 18th sponge and MXene film synergistically supported phase change materials towards
Int. Middle-East Power Syst. Conf. MEPCON 2016 - Proc., 2017, pp. 546–551, integrated shape stability , thermal management and electromagnetic
[Link] interference shielding, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 132 (2023) 132–143, [Link]
[196] P. Medina, A.W. Bizuayehu, J.P.S. Catalão, E.M.G. Rodrigues, J. Contreras, org/10.1016/[Link].2022.05.049.
Electrical energy storage systems: technologies’ state-of-the-art, techno-economic [221] Y. Ma, Y. Tao, L. Shi, Y. Wang, J.Y. Tu, L. Wang, Thermal performance
benefits and applications analysis, Proc. Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. (2014) improvement of a low-temperature thermal energy storage with configuration
2295–2304, [Link] optimization 60 (January) (2023), [Link]
[197] M. Beaudin, H. Zareipour, A. Schellenberglabe, W. Rosehart, Energy storage for [222] C. Li, Q. Li, R. Ge, X. Lu, in: A Novel One-step Ultraviolet Curing Fabrication of
mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: an updated review, Myristic Acid-Resin Shape-Stabilized Composite Phase Change Material for Low
Energy Sustain. Dev. 14 (4) (2010) 302–314, [Link] Temperature Thermal Energy Storage, 458, 2023, [Link]
esd.2010.09.007. cej.2023.141355. September 2022.
[198] S. Zhang, N. Pan, Supercapacitors performance evaluation, Adv. Energy Mater. 5 [223] J.J. Costa, N. Soares, T. Matias, L. Dur, P.N. Sim, Thermophysical characterization
(6) (2015) 1–19, [Link] of paraffin-based PCMs for low temperature thermal energy storage applications
[199] P. Lu, D. Xue, H. Yang, Y. Liu, Supercapacitor and nanoscale research towards for buildings 269 (January) (2023), [Link]
electrochemical energy storage, Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 4 (1) (2013) 2–26, energy.2023.126745.
[Link] [224] H.K. Berent, H. Demir, H.F. Oztop, Entropy analysis and thermal energy storage
[200] A.A.K. Arani, H. Karami, G.B. Gharehpetian, M.S.A. Hejazi, Review of Flywheel performance of PCM in honeycomb structure, Effects of materials and dimensions
Energy Storage Systems structures and applications in power systems and 38 (January) (2023), [Link]
microgrids, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69 (September 2015) (2017) 9–18, [225] B. Sun, M. Sun, L. Gao, D. Che, Y. Deng, Thermal performance analysis and
[Link] optimization of a double-layer spherical phase-change material capsule with
[201] P. Tatsidjodoung, N. Le Pierrès, L. Luo, A review of potential materials for thermal annular fins, J. Energy Storage 57 (September 2022) (2023) 106280, [Link]
energy storage in building applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 18 (2013) org/10.1016/[Link].2022.106280.
327–349, [Link] [226] U.N. Temel, F. Kilinc, Experimental investigation of variable fin length on melting
[202] A. Arteconi, N.J. Hewitt, F. Polonara, State of the art of thermal storage for performance in a rectangular enclosure containing phase change material, Int.
demand-side management, Appl. Energy 93 (2012) 371–389, [Link] Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 142 (February) (2023) 106658, [Link]
10.1016/[Link].2011.12.045. 10.1016/[Link].2023.106658.
[203] L.F. Cabeza, A. Castell, C. Barreneche, A. De Gracia, A.I. Fernández, Materials [227] S.E. Ahmed, Z.Z. Rashed, A. Al-hanaya, Three dimensional melting case of phase
used as PCM in thermal energy storage in buildings: a review, Renew. Sustain. change material composited with heat generating and local thermal non-
Energy Rev. 15 (3) (2011) 1675–1695, [Link] equilibrium copper foam under the magnetic impacts, Appl. Therm. Eng. 219 (PC)
rser.2010.11.018. (2023) 119662, [Link]
[204] M. Smolinski, T. Perkowski, A. Mystkowski, E. Dragašius, D. Eidukynas, R. [228] R. Zhu, D. Jing, Numerical study on thermal and melting performances of a
P. Jastrzebski, AMB flywheel integration with photovoltaic system for household horizontal latent heat storage unit with branched tree-like convergent fins,
purpose – modelling and analysis, Eksploat. i Niezawodn. 19 (1) (2017) 86–94, J. Energy Storage 62 (January) (2023) 106889, [Link]
[Link] est.2023.106889.
[205] J.M. Tarascon, Key challenges in future Li-battery research, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. [229] Y. Shen, S. Liu, A. Rehman, J. Wang, Y. Li, Energy & Buildings Phase change
A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368 (1923) (2010) 3227–3241, [Link] materials embedded with tuned porous media to alleviate overcharging problem
rsta.2010.0112. of cascaded latent heat storage system for building heating, Energy Build. 281
[206] S. Concept, et al., SS Symmetry A Survey of Battery – Supercapacitor Hybrid (2023) 112746, [Link]
Energy Storage, 2022. [230] J. Yu, Y. Wang, C. Qi, W. Zhang, Colloids and Surfaces A : physicochemical and
[207] M. Kolodziejski, I. Michalska-pozoga, Battery energy storage systems in ships ’ Engineering Aspects Reverse latent heat power generation properties of PCM/
hybrid/electric propulsion, Systems (2023) 1–25. nanoparticles/metal foam at night, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.
[208] J.A. Domínguez-Navarro, R. Dufo-López, J.M. Yusta-Loyo, J.S. Artal-Sevil, J. 665 (March) (2023) 131240, [Link]
L. Bernal-Agustín, Design of an electric vehicle fast-charging station with [231] J. Liu, M. Xue, Y. Zhou, S. Liu, T. Yan, Effective chemisorption of polysulfides
integration of renewable energy and storage systems, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy through organic molecules for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries, Chem.
26
D.A. Elalfy et al. Energy Strategy Reviews 54 (2024) 101482
Eng. J. 459 (November 2022) (2023) 141556, [Link] type well, Appl. Therm. Eng. 219 (PA) (2023) 119404, [Link]
cej.2023.141556. applthermaleng.2022.119404.
[232] Z. Wei, et al., Ultrafast microwave synthesis of MoTe2@graphene composites [253] U. Burger, et al., Optimizing the geothermal potential of tunnel water by
accelerating polysulfide conversion and promoting Li2S nucleation for high- separating colder sectional discharges, Case study Brenner Base Tunnel
performance Li-S batteries, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 635 (2023) 391–405, https:// Coefficient of Performance 203 (February 2022) (2023) 529–541, [Link]
[Link]/10.1016/[Link].2022.12.111. org/10.1016/[Link].2022.12.069.
[233] B. Chen, J. Wei, X. Li, Y. Ji, D. Liang, T. Chen, Vanadium dioxide plates reduced [254] T. Hai, et al., Exergo-economic and exergo-environmental evaluations and multi-
graphene oxide as sulfur cathodes for efficient polysulfides trap in long-life objective optimization of a novel multi-generation plant powered by geothermal
lithium-sulfur batteries, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 629 (2023) 1003–1011, https:// energy, Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 172 (November 2022) (2023) 57–68, https://
[Link]/10.1016/[Link].2022.09.028. [Link]/10.1016/[Link].2023.01.049.
[234] C. Zhang, et al., Applied Surface Science Accelerating electrochemical reactions in [255] X. Lv, Y. Lv, Y. Zhu, Multi-variable study and MOPSO-based multi-objective
Li-S batteries through better dispersion of sulfur and the robust catalytic effect optimization of a novel cogeneration plant using biomass fuel and geothermal
upon the vanadium nitride decorated hollow carbon spheres 614 (November energy : a complementary hybrid design, Energy 270 (November 2022) (2023)
2022, 2023), [Link] 126921, [Link]
[235] Y. Lin, et al., Alleviating the self-discharge and enhancing the polysulphides [256] M.A.H.A. g h Talsenaniheyab Rwu Zhang a, b Yeguo Sun, Sh Hasan, c Majdi,
conversion kinetics with LaCO 3 OH nanocrystals decorated hierarchical porous Deifalla d Ahmed, R Alsenani e Theyab, Zhanping Zhao f, Su b Zhanguo, Multi-
carbon, Chem. Eng. J. 452 (P2) (2023) 139091, [Link] aspect investigation and multi-criteria optimization of a novel solar-geothermal-
cej.2022.139091. based polygeneration system using flat plate and concentrated photovoltaic
[236] S. Jin, et al., in: Materials Today Sustainability A Nitrogen-Doped Carbon thermal solar collectors, Process Saf. Environ. Prot. (2023), [Link]
Skeleton Derived from Biomass as Conductive Agent for Electrochemically Stable 10.1016/[Link].2023.03.023.
Cathode of All-Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries, 21, 2023, [Link] [257] L. Liang, Y. Zhao, Y. Diao, R. Ren, T. Zhu, Y. Li, Experimental investigation of
10.1016/[Link].2022.100281. preheating performance of lithium-ion battery modules in electric vehicles
[237] P. Wang, X. He, Z. Lv, H. Song, X. Song, T. Yi, Light-Driven polymer-based all- enhanced by bending flat micro heat pipe array, Appl. Energy 337 (100) (2023)
solid-state lithium-sulfur battery operating at room temperature 2211074 (2023) 120896, [Link]
1–9, [Link] [258] N.T.M. Balakrishnan, et al., Quest for high-performance gel polymer electrolyte
[238] F. Namvar, M. Hajizadeh-oghaz, M.A. Mahdi, The synthesis and characterization by enhancing the miscibility of the bi-polymer blend for lithium-ion batteries :
of Ni-M-Tb/Al 2 O 3 (M : Mg , Ca , Sr and Ba) nanocatalysts prepared by different performance evaluation in extreme temperatures, Mater. Today Chem. 29 (2023)
types of doping using the ultrasonic- assisted method to enhance CO 2 101407, [Link]
methanation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 (10) (2022) 3862–3877, [Link] [259] X. Li, et al., Grid-like Fe3O4 nanocrystals enhance the performances of glass-
org/10.1016/[Link].2022.10.243. ceramic anodes for lithium-ion batteries, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 605 (January)
[239] X.W. Zhiqiang Zhang, Shaorong Deng, Xiuzhong Fang, Junwei Xu, Xianglan Xu, (2023) 122157, [Link]
Key, CrO x -promoted Ru/Al 2 O 3 for CO 2 methanation : formation of surface Cr- [260] A.Z. Xinyan Du, Libo Wang, Yiwen Fu, Haiyan Wang, Mengmeng Yuan,
doped RuO 2 solid solution plays key roles, Fuel 339 (January) (2023) 127414, Qixun Xia, Qianku Hu, Enhancing the electrochemical performance of d-Mo2CTx
[Link] MXene in lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors by sulfur decoration, Ceram.
[240] J.J.C. Struijs, V. Muravev, M.A. Verheijen, E.J.M. Hensen, in: Ceria-Supported Int. (2023), [Link]
Cobalt Catalyst for Low-Temperature Methanation at Low Partial Pressures of CO [261] S. b Edy Riyanto, Tony Kristiantoro, Erie Martides, Dedi, Budi Prawara,
2, 202214864, 2023, [Link] Dadang Mulyadi, Lithium-ion battery performance improvement using two-
[241] X. Chen, Y. He, X. Cui, L. Liu, High value utilization of waste blast furnace slag : dimensional materials, Mater. Today Proc. (2023), [Link]
new Ni-CeO 2/hBFS catalyst for low temperature CO 2 methanation, Fuel 338 matpr.2023.02.392 xxxx.
(November 2022) (2023) 127309, [Link] [262] A.D. Savio, et al., DC microgrid integrated electric vehicle charging station
[242] R.C. Muduli, P. Kale, ScienceDirect Silicon nanostructures for solid-state scheduling optimization, J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 26 (2) (2023) 253–260, [Link]
hydrogen storage : a review, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 (4) (2022) 1401–1439, org/10.6180/jase.202302_26(2).0011.
[Link] [263] E. Rahmani, S. Mohammadi, M. Zadehbagheri, M. Kiani, Probabilistic reliability
[243] D. Gao, L. Zhang, M. Song, F. Wu, Interfacial engineering of nickel/vanadium management of energy storage systems in connected/islanding microgrids with
based two-dimensional layered double hydroxide for solid-state hydrogen storage renewable energy, Elec. Power Syst. Res. 214 (PA) (2023) 108891, [Link]
in MgH 2, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 (25) (2022) 9390–9400, [Link] org/10.1016/[Link].2022.108891.
10.1016/[Link].2022.12.032. [264] B. Xiao, J. Liu, B. Zhang, F. Wu, Optimal configuration of grid-connected
[244] E. Díaz, P. Rapado-gallego, S. Ord, in: Systematic Evaluation of Physicochemical microgrid with hydrogen energy storage considering ladder-type carbon trading
Properties for the Selection of Alternative Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers, 59, and demand response | 考虑阶梯碳交易和需求响应的含氢储能的并网型微电网优
2023, [Link] November 2022. 化配置, Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Autom. Equip. 43 (1) (2023)
[245] V.O. Samoilov, et al., The production and the properties of the liquid organic 121–129, [Link]
hydrogen carrier (LOHC) obtained from the light cycle oil (LCO), Fuel Process. [265] P.K. Pathak, A.K. Yadav, A. Shastri, P.A. Alvi, BWOA assisted PIDF-(1+I)
Technol. 240 (September 2022) (2023) 107576, [Link] controller for intelligent load frequency management of standalone micro-grid,
fuproc.2022.107576. ISA Trans. 132 (2022) 387–401, [Link]
[246] Y. Deng, M. Yang, M. Zaiser, S. Yu, Enhancing dehydrogenation performance of [266] B. Singh, S.K. Bishnoi, M. Sharma, P. Singh, S. Dhundhara, An application of
MgH 2/graphene heterojunctions via noble metal intercalation, Int. J. Hydrogen nature inspried algorithm based dual-stage frequency control strategy for multi
Energy (xxxx) (2023) 1–12, [Link] micro-grid system, Ain Shams Eng. J. (xxxx) (2023) 102125, [Link]
[247] L. Li, X. Gong, Z. Yang, R. Zhang, Z. Jiang, Boosting the dehydrogenation 10.1016/[Link].2023.102125.
efficiency of dodecahydro-N-ethylcarbazole by assembling Pt nanoparticles on [267] J. Erdocia, A. Urtasun, L. Marroyo, Conductance-frequency droop control to
the single-layer Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy (xxxx) (2023), ensure transient stability of inverter-based stand-alone microgrids, Int. J. Electr.
[Link] Power Energy Syst. 144 (July 2022) (2023) 108562, [Link]
[248] H. Feng, D. Yanan, X. Ting, L. Yongzhi, Z. Xin, X. Jianyi, Influence of adding ijepes.2022.108562.
graphene on the hydrogen storage thermodynamics and kinetics of as-milled [268] Y. Mu, et al., Day-ahead optimal scheduling of building energy microgrids based
CeMg 12 e Ni alloy, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy (xxxx) (2022) 1–14, [Link] on time-varying virtual energy storage, IET Renew. Power Gener. (August 2022)
10.1016/[Link].2022.12.227. (2022) 376–388, [Link]
[249] F. Chen, et al., Applied Surface Science Nitrogen-doped or boron-doped twin T- [269] A. Ghasemi-Marzbali, M. Shafiei, R. Ahmadiahangar, Day-ahead economical
graphene as advanced and reversible hydrogen storage media, Appl. Surf. Sci. 622 planning of multi-vector energy district considering demand response program,
(March) (2023) 156895, [Link] Appl. Energy 332 (October 2022) (2023) 120351, [Link]
[250] Q. Li, N. Miao, J. Zhong, C. Wu, H. Leng, Different effect between KH and KOH apenergy.2022.120351.
additives on the hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 doped with graphene, [270] F. Lu, Y. Ji, D. Shi, J. Yao, L. Pei, Electrochemically activated 3D Mn doped NiCo
J. Alloys Compd. 940 (2023) 168795, [Link] hydroxide electrode materials toward high-performance supercapacitors,
jallcom.2023.168795. J. Colloid Interface Sci. (2023), [Link]
[251] O. Arslan, A. Ergenekon, T. Eddine, Modelling and optimization of domestic [271] M.I. Anwar, et al., Nitrogenous MOFs and their composites as high-performance
thermal energy storage based heat pump system for geothermal district heating, electrode material for supercapacitors: recent advances and perspectives, Coord.
Energy Build. 282 (2023) 112792, [Link] Chem. Rev. 478 (2023) 214967, [Link]
enbuild.2023.112792. [272] X. Sun, et al., Heterostructure of MnSe 2 @ NiCo 2 Se 4 as novel electrode
[252] W. Zhang, K. Wang, C. Guan, H. Yao, W. Li, Y. Gao, Analysis and optimization of material for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors, J. Energy Storage 63
the performance for the ground source heat pump system with the middle-deep U- (March) (2023) 107041, [Link]
27
Different energy storage technologies vary widely in efficiency and suitability depending on the application. For instance, Li-ion batteries have high efficiency and a large energy ratio, but are costly, which limits their use in power applications . Flywheel energy storage systems (FES) offer high energy density and long lifetime but suffer from high self-discharge and low power density . Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) systems are efficient but suited for small scale applications due to their quick response times . In contrast, Pumped Hydro Storage (PHES) and Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) are suitable for large-scale applications due to their high storage capacity .
To minimize battery degradation in energy storage systems, several technological strategies can be employed. Using advanced algorithms like the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) for the optimal design of distributed networks can prevent over and under voltage, contributing to reduced battery wear and tear . Additionally, integrating supercapacitors can mitigate high power draw, preventing fast charge/discharge cycles, which consequently minimizes battery degradation . Optimizing State of Charge (SOC) management also ensures the battery operates within safe limits, prolonging battery life .
Integrating energy storage systems (ESS) in renewable energy systems faces several challenges and limitations. Key issues include the high cost of batteries, battery degradation over time, and lack of efficient control algorithms for battery management . Additionally, economic studies on ESS often only cover system capital costs, ignoring operational and maintenance costs, and degradation losses . These limitations suggest a need for comprehensive technoeconomic analyses when integrating ESS in grid-connected or isolated systems .
Flywheel energy storage systems (FES) and Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) systems differ significantly in characteristics relevant to renewable energy applications. FES boasts high energy density, fast charging speeds, and long lifetimes, making them suitable for applications requiring rapid energy delivery . However, FES has high self-discharge rates and low power density. In contrast, CAES systems are utilized for larger scale applications due to their ability to store substantial amounts of energy for extended periods, though they have slower response times when compared to FES .
Implementing Model Predictive Control (MPC) combined with Benders decomposition contributes to maximizing photovoltaic utilization in grid-connected storage systems by providing an optimal strategy for energy storage management. This approach helps balance supply and demand by predicting future energy production and consumption patterns, minimizing energy wastage, and thus maximizing the utilization of generated photovoltaic energy . Furthermore, this method supports decision-making for long-term planning, ensuring efficient operational management of distributed battery storage .
Economic analysis plays a crucial role in the practicality and adoption of new energy storage technologies. It ensures that technologies are not only technically viable but also economically feasible for widespread deployment. Comprehensive economic analyses should include capital investment, operational, maintenance costs, and degradation losses . These analyses provide insights into cost-effectiveness and guide decision-making for adopting ESS technologies in both isolated and grid-connected systems. An incomplete analysis focused solely on capital cost may overlook essential aspects that affect the long-term financial viability of ESS .
Optimization algorithms significantly impact the design and efficiency of energy storage systems in hybrid networks by determining the optimal configuration and operation strategies. For example, using the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) allows for the optimal design of distributed networks by addressing issues such as voltage regulation and battery scheduling . The grey wolf optimization method has been used to effectively size electrical energy storage systems, minimizing investment costs in microgrids . These algorithms contribute to reducing costs and enhancing the lifespan and efficiency of the energy storage systems through optimal allocation and sizing decisions .
Hybrid Energy Storage Systems (HESS) can be optimized by selecting appropriate storage technologies and using optimization techniques. For instance, a basic optimization approach involves choosing a low-pass filter’s cut-off frequency to allocate power efficiently among storage technologies . By integrating different storage technologies like supercapacitors, batteries, and fuel cells, HESS can reduce costs, extend the system's lifetime, enhance efficiency, and minimize battery degradation .
Including hydrogen storage systems in hybrid energy storage configurations offers several implications for efficiency and longevity of the systems. Hydrogen systems can provide cleaner energy solutions with minimal emissions and are suitable for distributed storage applications due to their scalability and flexibility . However, they are still in the research phase to enhance efficiency. Integrating hydrogen storage with other technologies, such as batteries, can extend the overall system's lifetime and reduce energy costs, although care must be taken regarding battery aging during integration .
When selecting an appropriate energy storage system, several principles need to be considered. These include capacity, which determines the amount of energy stored; power, which affects how quickly energy can be charged or discharged; efficiency, which accounts for energy loss during storage; storage period, which indicates how long energy is stored; and lifetime, defining the duration of optimal equipment use . Cost is another critical factor, incorporating both capital and operational expenses. Fast response time is crucial for applications requiring quick power delivery, making technologies like flywheels and supercapacitors ideal for such needs .