EMOTION

The word emotion originates from the Latin word ‘emovere’ which means ‘to
agitate’ or ‘to excite’ or ‘to stir up’. Emotions are often confused with feelings
and moods, but the three terms are not interchangeable. According to the
American Psychological Association (APA), emotion is defined as “a complex
reaction pattern, involving experiential, behavioral and physiological elements.”
Emotions are how individuals deal with matters or situations they find personally
significant. Emotional experiences have three components: a subjective
experience, a physiological response and a behavioral or expressive response.
Emotions are reactions that human beings experience in response to events or
situations. The type of emotion a person experiences is determined by the
circumstance that triggers the emotion.

Classification of emotions:
1. Primary emotions- are fundamental, basic emotional responses that arise
automatically and instinctively in response to specific stimuli or situations.
These emotions are universal and typically appear early in human
development. They are generally thought to be innate and biologically
programmed, meaning that they are experienced by people across different
cultures and societies. They include emotions like happiness, sadness, fear,
anger, disgust and surprise.
2. Secondary emotions- are more complex emotional experiences that arise
from a combination of primary emotions and cognitive evaluations. Unlike
primary emotions, which are automatic and instinctive, secondary
emotions are often influenced by our thoughts, beliefs, experiences, and
social context. These emotions typically emerge after the initial emotional
response and often require more reflection or processing. These include
emotions like guilt, shame, pride, embarrassment, jealousy, regret, etc.

Theories of emotions:
Emotion is a complex state of feeling that results in physical and psychological
changes that influence thought and behavior. There are different theories of
emotion to explain what emotions are and how they operate. This is challenging,
since emotions can be analyzed from many different perspectives. In one sense,
emotions are sophisticated and subtle, the epitome of what make us human. In
another sense, however, human emotions seem to be very similar to (if not the
2|Page
same as) the responses that other animals display. Further, the emotions that we
have and how we express them reflect our social environment, but it also seems
likely that emotions were shaped by natural selection over time. These and other
conflicting features of the emotions make constructing a theory difficult and have
led to the creation of a variety of different theories.
Theories of emotion can be categorized in terms of the context within which the
explanation is developed. Some of them are:
1. The James-Lange theory
James-Lange theory of emotion (the 1880s) proposed that bodily changes
come first and form the basis of an emotional experience. Thus, emotions
are caused by bodily sensations (you become happier when you smile. You
are afraid because you run). The James-Lange theory of emotion has
spurned over a century of research into the physiology of emotion, and
notable critics of the James-Lange theory (such as the Cannon-Bard theory
of emotion) have also garnered tremendous traction from researchers.
According to this theory, witnessing an external stimulus leads to a
physiological response. Your emotional reaction depends on how you
interpret those physical reactions. William James explained, "My thesis, on
the contrary, is that the bodily changes follow directly the PERCEPTION
of the exciting fact and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur
IS the emotion.”
This theory of emotion suggests that emotion provoking events produce
various physiological reactions and that recognition of these is responsible
for subjective emotional experience. It suggests that subjective emotional
experiences are actually the result of physiological changes within our
bodies. In other words, you feel frightened when making your speech
because you notice that your heart is racing, your mouth is dry and so on.

3|Page
For example, imagine that you are walking through a dark parking garage
toward your car. You notice a dark figure trailing behind you and your heart
begins to race. According to the James-Lange theory, you then interpret
your physical reactions to the stimulus as fear. Therefore, you feel
frightened and rush to your car as quickly as you can.
Criticisms
One major criticism of the theory was that neither James nor Lange based
their ideas upon anything that remotely resembled controlled
experiments.4 Instead, the theory was largely the result of introspection
and correlational research. Both James and Lange did present some clinical
findings to support their theory. For example, Lange cited one physician's
observations that blood flow to the skull increased when a patient was
angry, which he interpreted as supporting his idea that a physical response
to a stimuli led to the experience of that emotion. According to both James
and Lange, physiological responses should be necessary to truly experience
emotion.3 However, researchers discovered that even those with muscle
paralysis and lack of sensation were able to still feel emotions such as joy,
fear, and anger.
2. Cannon-Bard theory: is referred to as the thalamic theory of
emotion. The theory was developed in 1927 by Walter B. Cannon and
his graduate student, Philip Bard. It was established as an alternative to
the James-Lange theory of emotion. This theory states that feelings are
the result of physical reactions to a stimulating event. According to the
Cannon-Bard theory of emotion, we react to a stimulus and experience
the associated emotion at the same time. The physical reactions are not
dependent upon the emotional reactions, or vice versa.
When an event occurs, the thalamus transmits a signal to the amygdala.
The amygdala is a small, oval-shaped structure in the brain that plays
an important role in emotional processing, including emotions such as
fear and anger. The thalamus also sends signals to the autonomic
nervous system, resulting in physical reactions such as muscle tension,
shaking, and sweating.
According to the Cannon-Bard theory of emotion, you will experience
feelings of fear and physical reaction at the same time. You will begin
to feel fearful, and your heart will begin to race. You rush to your car,
lock the doors behind you, and rush out of the parking garage to head
home.
4|Page
 The Cannon-Bard theory differs from other theories of emotion such as
the James-Lange theory of emotion, which argues that physiological
responses occur first and are the cause of emotions
For example, imagine that you are walking to your car through a
darkened parking garage. You hear the sounds of footsteps trailing
behind you, and spot a shadowy figure slowly following you as you
make your way to your car.

The James-Lange theory was the dominant theory of emotion at the

time, but Harvard physiologist Walter Cannon and his doctoral student
Philip Bard felt that the theory did not accurately reflect how emotional
experiences take place.
Cannon and Bard instead suggested that the experience of emotion was
not dependent upon interpreting the body's physiological reactions.
Instead, they believed that the emotion and the physical response occur
simultaneously and that one was not dependent upon the other.
Criticisms
Criticisms suggest that Cannon-Bard theory places too much emphasis
on the role that the thalamus plays in emotions while largely ignoring
other parts of the brain. The thalamus is part of the limbic system and
does play an important part in the experience of emotions, but more
recent research suggests that the process is more complex than the
Cannon-Bard theory suggests.
3. Schacter-Singer’s Two factor theory:
The Schachter-Singer theory, often called the two-factor theory of
emotion, proposes that a combination of physiological arousal and
cognitive interpretation determines emotions. This theory was

5|Page
developed by psychologists Stanley Schachter and Jerome E. Singer in
the 1960s.
This is a theory of emotion suggesting that our subjective emotional
states are determined, at least in part, by the cognitive labels we attach
to feelings of arousal.
Acceding to this view, Schacter-Singer’s theory is also known as the
two factor theory, emotion-provoking events produce increased
arousal, in response to these feeling we then search the external
environment in order to identify the cause behind them. The factors
we then select, plays a key role in determining the label we placed on
our arousal and so in determining the emotion we experience.
The Schachter- Singer theory is a two-factor view because it considers
both arousal and the cognitive appraisal we perform in our efforts to
identify the cause of such arousal.

For example,
You see a friend while you're out shopping. You haven't spoken to this
friend because the two of you had a fight. You experience a physical
response of a rapid heart rate. You cognitively label this feeling

6|Page
 "nervous." Then, you feel the emotion, and perhaps leave the store to
avoid seeing them.
Criticisms:
The Schachter-Singer theory of emotion has been criticized for:
• Oversimplification: The theory reduces emotions to a simple
interaction between physiological activation and cognition. It
doesn't consider other factors that can affect emotions, like social,
cultural, or environmental influences.
• Focus on arousal and cognition: The theory ignores the role of
the central nervous system in the emotional process. It assumes
that emotions are always preceded by physiological arousal and
cognitive labelling.
• Failure to explain certain emotions: The theory can't explain
emotions like melancholy or wistfulness, which may have little
or no physiological arousal. It also can't fully explain complex
emotions like love, guilt, and pride.

Emotion Regulation:
Emotions are integral to the human experience, shaping our reactions, decisions
and overall, well-being. Emotion regulation is the ability to exert control over
one’s own emotional state. It may involve behaviours such as rethinking a
challenging situation to reduce anger or anxiety, hiding visible signs of sadness
or fear or focusing on reasons to feel happy or calm.
This process model of emotion regulation proposed by psychologist James
Gross emphasises that people can act to control their emotions at different points
in time-including before they feel an emotion and after they have already begun
to react emotionally.
Process Model of Emotion Regulation
James Gross is an emotion researcher who focuses on emotion regulation. Gross
developed the process model of emotion regulation. This model identifies five
emotion regulation strategies that occurs during different time points in the
emotion experiences: situation selections, situation modification, attentional
deployment, cognitive change and response modulations. Gross further divided
these strategies into antecedent-focused and response-focused. Antecedent-
focused regulation occurs before the emotion is fully experienced or during the

7|Page
emotion experience, whereas response-focused regulation occurs after the
emotion has completely developed.
So, with response-focused people have already ‘responded’ to the eliciting
event and thus have experienced all the emotion component changes. Within
response- focused, people can regulate their emotions by trying to change any of
the emotion components. They might change their facial expressions and vocal
tone, suppress their thoughts, increases or decrease their physiological arousal
and even change their subjective feelings.
For example, if you meet your friend for coffee to discuss an argument you had
with your parent, you are actively selecting to go to coffee and while at coffee
also trying to consciously lower your arousal level.
Gross's model provides a framework for how individuals regulate their emotions
through a series of stages, each involving different strategies.
1. Situation Selection: This is the first stage, where individuals choose
situations that either increase or decrease the likelihood of experiencing
certain emotions. For example, avoiding a stressful event or seeking out a
calming environment. This is a proactive strategy.
2. Situation Modification: In this stage, individuals alter the situation to
change its emotional impact. This could involve actions like changing the
topic in a conversation or removing oneself from an uncomfortable
situation. It is a direct strategy aimed at adjusting the circumstances to
reduce emotional intensity.
3. Attentional Deployment: At this point, individuals focus their attention
on certain aspects of the situation, effectively ignoring or re-directing
attention away from emotionally triggering elements. Techniques like
distraction or focusing on positive aspects of a situation are common
examples. This can be either an adaptive (e.g., focusing on positive details)
or maladaptive (e.g., avoidance) strategy.
4. Cognitive Change: This stage involves reinterpreting or reappraising the
emotional meaning of the situation to alter its emotional impact. For
example, seeing a failure as a learning experience or reframing an
argument with someone as an opportunity for growth. Reappraisal is a core
cognitive regulation strategy.
5. Response Modulation: The final stage involves influencing the emotional
response once it has already been experienced. This includes efforts to
suppress or enhance the emotional response. For example, trying to calm
oneself down after feeling angry or enhancing one’s happiness through

8|Page
 actions. This stage can involve techniques like rethinking one's feelings or
controlling outward emotional expressions.

Criticism:
1. Overemphasis on Cognitive Strategies:
The model places significant emphasis on cognitive strategies like
reappraisal and cognitive change (i.e., how we interpret situations to
regulate emotions). Critics argue that this focus overlooks other emotional
regulation strategies that might be more physiological or behavioral in
nature (e.g., physical exercise to reduce stress, or engaging in social
support).
Emotions aren't always under conscious cognitive control, so relying too
heavily on cognitive strategies might ignore the role of automatic or
unconscious emotion regulation mechanisms.
2. Lack of Attention to the Social Context:
While Gross’s model does touch upon social interactions (e.g., situation
selection or modification), it has been criticized for not adequately
addressing the social and cultural influences on emotion regulation.
Emotions are often regulated within a social context, and different cultures
have different norms for emotional expression and regulation.
Social support or the influence of others (like family, peers, or societal
norms) can be crucial, but the model doesn't go deeply into how emotions
are regulated in group settings or how social dynamics influence emotion
regulation strategies.

9|Page
 3. Linear and Static Model:
The linear progression from situation selection to response modulation has
been critiqued as oversimplified. In real-life situations, emotional
regulation doesn’t necessarily follow a sequential or fixed order. People
may switch between strategies, and these strategies may overlap, making
it more dynamic and non-linear than the model suggests.
Some argue that the stages (e.g., situation modification, cognitive change,
etc.) can occur simultaneously or cyclically, and emotions may be
regulated at multiple stages of the emotional experience in parallel.
4. Inadequate Consideration of Maladaptive Strategies:
The model focuses mainly on adaptive strategies, but there is less attention
to maladaptive strategies like rumination, avoidance, or suppression in
detail. While suppression is mentioned as a response modulation strategy,
it isn’t deeply explored how these maladaptive strategies affect long-term
well-being and emotional health. The model could benefit from a more
nuanced discussion of how these strategies might be dysfunctional or
counterproductive in certain contexts.
The model assumes that people can always engage in effective regulation
when in reality, not everyone is capable of managing their emotions in
adaptive ways. There's no clear understanding of how people fail in
emotion regulation and what leads to maladaptive or harmful regulation.
Emotional Intelligence
Emotional intelligence is a person’s awareness of their emotions and the
emotions of others and how well they able to control, express and read them.
People who are emotionally intelligent are able to control their interpersonal
relationships with thoughtful consideration and rational insights.
The term emotional intelligence was created by two researchers, Peter Salavoy
and John Mayer in their article “Emotional Intelligence” in the journal
‘Imagination, Cognition and Personality’ in 1990. It was later popularized by
Daniel Goleman in his 1996 book Emotional Intelligence. Goleman developed a
framework of five key components that make up emotional intelligence.
The five components are:
• Self-awareness
• Self-regulation
• Motivation
• Empathy

10 | P a g e
 • Social Skills
Emotional intelligence is not simply whether or not someone is emotional, but
rather how well they handle their interpersonal skills and the emotions of others.
Emotional intelligence is extremely important in the workplace to reduce conflict
and create a more stable and effective workplace environment.
Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence
The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence was proposed by psychologists
Peter Salovey and John Mayer in 1990. This model views emotional
intelligence (EI) as a set of abilities that involve the capacity to recognize,
understand, manage, and regulate emotions in oneself and others. The key idea
behind the ability model is that emotional intelligence is a form of intellectual
ability that can be developed and enhanced over time.
Salvey and Mayer’s conception of EI strives to define EI within the confines
of the standard criteria for a new intelligence. Following their continuing
research, their initial definition of EI was revised to “The ability to perceive
emotion, integrate emotion to facilitate thought, understand emotions and to
regulate emotions to promote personal growth”. However, after pursuing further
research, their definition of EI evolves into “the capacity to reason about emotions
and of emotions to enhance thinking.”
Salovey and Mayer's model consists of four branches or dimensions that represent
different aspects of emotional intelligence:
1. Perceiving Emotions (Emotional Perception):
o This is the ability to accurately recognize and identify emotions in
oneself, others, and in the environment. It involves understanding
emotional expressions, facial cues, body language, and the
emotional tone of situations.
o Example: Recognizing that someone is upset even if they are trying
to hide their feelings, or noticing that you are feeling anxious before
giving a presentation.
2. Facilitating Thought (Using Emotions to Facilitate Thinking):
o This ability refers to using emotions to enhance cognitive processes
and decision-making. Emotions can help prioritize thinking and
guide behavior by influencing attention, memory, and problem-
solving.
o Example: Feeling excited about a new project may help you focus
and engage more creatively in brainstorming. Alternatively, anxiety
about a task may heighten focus and attention to detail.
11 | P a g e
 3. Understanding Emotions (Emotional Understanding):
o This involves the ability to comprehend the complex nature of
emotions, such as understanding how emotions evolve over time,
how different emotions relate to each other, and the causes and
consequences of emotional experiences.
o Example: Recognizing that feelings of frustration can sometimes
stem from unmet expectations or understanding that mixed emotions
(e.g., joy and sadness) may occur at the same time in significant life
events (e.g., a wedding).
4. Managing Emotions (Emotion Regulation):
o This is the ability to effectively manage and regulate emotions in
oneself and in others. It involves the capacity to adaptively cope
with negative emotions, maintain emotional stability, and influence
emotional states for personal and social benefit.
o Example: Being able to calm down when you're angry, helping a
friend manage their anxiety, or adjusting your emotional responses
to a challenging situation.

Criticisms of the Ability Model

1. Overemphasis on Cognitive Processes: Critics argue that the model focuses
too much on cognitive aspects of emotional intelligence and neglects the
role of personality traits or social factors that also contribute to how we
manage emotions in daily life.
2. Limited Focus on Social Skills: The model has been criticized for its
narrow scope, mainly focusing on individual emotional regulation and not

12 | P a g e
 enough on social interactions or relationship management, which are
crucial aspects of emotional intelligence in real-world contexts.
3. Measurement Issues: Although the MSCEIT provides a way to assess
emotional intelligence, some researchers argue that it is too complex and
may not be a fully accurate reflection of real-world emotional intelligence.
There’s also debate over whether it captures emotional intelligence in its
entirety.
4. Complexity and Accessibility: Some critics argue that the model’s
emphasis on cognitive abilities may make it less accessible to laypeople or
people without a strong educational background in cognitive psychology.
Emotional intelligence may be experienced and understood more
holistically in everyday life.
Despite these criticisms, the Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence remains
influential in both psychological research and practical applications, such as
leadership, education, and personal development. It continues to contribute to a
deeper understanding of how emotions play a role in human intelligence and
decision-making.

13 | P a g e