0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views5 pages

Overview of Tort Law Principles and Cases

The document outlines the principles of tortious liability, including definitions, distinctions from other legal concepts, and general defenses. It covers specific torts such as assault, defamation, and negligence, as well as vicarious, strict, and absolute liability. Additionally, it addresses the Consumer Protection Act, detailing consumer rights, product liability, and redressal mechanisms.

Uploaded by

Heeral Singh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views5 pages

Overview of Tort Law Principles and Cases

The document outlines the principles of tortious liability, including definitions, distinctions from other legal concepts, and general defenses. It covers specific torts such as assault, defamation, and negligence, as well as vicarious, strict, and absolute liability. Additionally, it addresses the Consumer Protection Act, detailing consumer rights, product liability, and redressal mechanisms.

Uploaded by

Heeral Singh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

LAW OF TORTS (INCLUDING MV ACT & CPA, 2019)

UNIT 1: PRINCIPLES OF TORTIOUS LIABILITY & GENERAL DEFENCES

1.1 Definition, Nature & Scope

 Tort: A civil wrong not arising out of a contract.


 Derived from Latin word 'Tortus' = twisted/wrong.
 Based on Common Law principles; codified through precedents.
 Actionable tort: must involve a wrongful act + legal damage + remedy.

Distinction from other wrongs

 Tort vs. Crime: Public wrong vs. private wrong; prosecuted by state vs. individual.
 Tort vs. Contract: Consent-based obligations in contract; tort obligations exist
independently.
 Tort vs. Quasi-contract: Tort = wrongdoing; quasi-contract = obligation without
agreement.

Constituents of Tort

 Wrongful act: Violation of legal right.


 Legal Damage:
o Injuria sine damnum: Violation of right without actual loss (e.g., Ashby v White).
o Damnum sine injuria: Loss without violation of right (e.g., Gloucester Grammar
School case).
 Remedy: Ubi jus ibi remedium - Where there is a right, there is a remedy.

Judicial Remedies

 Damages: Nominal, general, special, punitive, etc.


 Injunctions: Preventive relief; permanent/temporary.
 Restitution: Specific performance, ejectment.

Extra-Judicial Remedies

 Self-defence, re-entry, recapture, abatement, distress damage feasant.

1.3 General Defences

 Volenti non fit injuria: Consent to risk negates liability.


o Exceptions: Rescue cases (Haynes v Harwood).
 Plaintiff the wrongdoer: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.
 Inevitable Accident: Unforeseeable, unavoidable harm.
 Act of God: Natural forces; e.g., Nichols v Marshland.
 Private Defence: Use of reasonable force.
 Necessity: Harm justified by emergency.
 Statutory Authority: Acts authorized by law (Vaughan v Taff Vale Rly).

Capacity to Sue & Be Sued

 Minors, corporations, state, judicial officers, etc.


 Special rules apply for joint tortfeasors and parental authority.

UNIT 2: SPECIFIC TORTS

Torts Against Person

 Assault: Threat/attempt to harm causing apprehension.


 Battery: Actual physical contact without consent.
 False Imprisonment: Total restraint without legal justification.

Defamation

 Libel: Written, permanent.


 Slander: Spoken, temporary.
 Essentials: False, defamatory, refers to plaintiff, published.
 Defences:
o Truth (justification)
o Fair comment (honest opinion)
o Privilege (absolute/qualified)
o Consent
o Apology

Economic Torts

 Inducing breach of contract: (Lumley v Gye)


 Conspiracy
 Malicious falsehood

Nuisance

 Public: Affects community; prosecuted by state.


 Private: Affects individual use/enjoyment of land.
 Defences: Prescription, statutory authority.
 Remedies: Damages, injunction, abatement.

UNIT 3: VICARIOUS, STRICT & ABSOLUTE LIABILITY

Vicarious Liability

 Master liable for servant's acts done in course of employment.


 Maxims:
o Qui facit per alium facit per se
o Respondeat superior
 Partnership: Acts in ordinary business bind firm.
 Independent Contractors: Principal not liable except in hazardous work.

State Liability

 Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity: Limited in India.


 Constitutional torts: Breach of FRs; State liable (e.g., Bhim Singh).

Strict Liability

 Rule in Rylands v Fletcher: Person keeping dangerous thing is liable if it escapes.


 Exceptions: Plaintiff’s fault, act of God, consent, statutory authority.

Absolute Liability

 From M.C. Mehta v Union of India (1987):


o No exceptions
o Applicable to hazardous industries

Motor Vehicles Act, 2019

 Section 161: Hit and run – No fault, fixed compensation.


 Section 164: No fault for any accident – Rs. 5 lakh death, Rs. 2.5 lakh injury.
 Section 166: Fault-based claim.
 Claims Tribunal (MACT): Compensation decided here.
 Good Samaritan Rule, Golden Hour, Offences by minors.

UNIT 4: NEGLIGENCE & REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE

Negligence

 Essentials:
1. Duty of care
2. Breach of duty
3. Causation + Damage
 Case: Donoghue v Stevenson – Neighbour principle

Proof: Res Ipsa Loquitur

 Thing speaks for itself.

Defences
 Contributory negligence
 Volenti non fit injuria
 Act of God
 Necessity
 Illegality

Remoteness of Damage

 In Re Polemis: Direct consequence test.


 Wagon Mound Case: Foreseeability test.
 Eggshell Skull Rule: Defendant liable for full extent.
 Novus Actus Interveniens: Breaks causal chain.
 Nervous Shock: Recognised if foreseeable (Alcock v Chief Constable).

UNIT 5: CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019

Key Concepts

 Consumer: Person who buys goods or avails services for consideration.


 Defect (goods): Fault in quality, quantity, etc.
 Deficiency (service): Imperfection, negligence.
 Complaint: Allegation of unfair practice, defect, or deficiency.

Product Liability

 Strict liability against manufacturers, sellers, service providers.


 Covers injury, damage, death, emotional loss.

Unfair Trade Practices (UTP) & Restrictive Trade Practices (RTP)

 Misleading ads, hoarding, price manipulation.

Consumer Redressal Forums

 District Commission: up to Rs. 50 lakh


 State Commission: Rs. 50 lakh – 2 crore
 National Commission: Above Rs. 2 crore

Key Cases

 Spring Meadows v Harjot Ahluwalia: Child = consumer


 IMA v VP Shantha: Medical services = services under CPA
MANDATORY CASES (By Unit Highlights)
Unit 1

 Ashby v White: Injuria sine damnum


 Nicholas v Marshland: Act of God
 Bird v Holbrook: Private Defence

Unit 2

 Bird v Jones: False Imprisonment


 Lumley v Gye: Inducing breach of contract
 Sturges v Bridgman: Private nuisance

Unit 3

 M.C. Mehta v Union of India: Absolute liability


 Rylands v Fletcher: Strict liability
 State of Rajasthan v Vidhyawati: Sovereign immunity

Unit 4

 Donoghue v Stevenson: Duty of care (Neighbour Principle)


 Davies v Mann: Last opportunity rule
 Wagon Mound: Foreseeability in remoteness

Unit 5

 Spring Meadows Hospital: Child as consumer


 Indian Medical Association v VP Shantha: Medical services as "services" under CPA

You might also like