KITS

Professional Ethics and Human Values

UNIT-II

EngineeringEthicsandSocialExperimentation:
History of Ethics

The history of ethics can be traced back to the ancient world, with the earliest recorded
ethical systems emerging in ancient Egypt, India, and China. In the West, the most influential
early ethical thinkers were the Greek philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.

* **Socrates** (469-399 BCE) is credited with founding the field of ethics as a distinct
branch of philosophy. He believed that the key to ethical living was to know oneself, and that
this knowledge could be achieved through a process of critical self-examination.

* **Plato** (428-348 BCE) developed a theory of ethics based on the idea of the Forms. He
argued that there are two worlds, the world of appearances and the world of Forms. The
world of appearances is the world we see around us, and it is full of change and imperfection.
The world of Forms is the world of perfect ideas, and it is the source of all goodness and
truth.

* **Aristotle** (384-322 BCE) developed a theory of ethics based on the idea of virtue. He
argued that there are four cardinal virtues: courage, temperance, justice, and wisdom. These
virtues are essential for living a good life, and they can be cultivated through practice.

In the modern era, new ethical theories have emerged, such as utilitarianism and deontology.
Utilitarianism is a theory that argues that the right action is the one that produces the
greatest good for the greatest number of people. Deontology is a theory that argues that the
right action is the one that follows from a set of moral duties.

The history of ethics is a long and complex one, and there are many different ethical theories
that have been proposed over the centuries. However, all of these theories share a common
goal: to help us understand what it means to live a good life.

Here are some examples of ethical codes from different cultures and time periods:

* The Hindu Bhagavad Gita (4th century BCE) is a sacred text that contains a dialogue
between the warrior Arjuna and his charioteer Krishna. The Bhagavad Gita discusses a
number of ethical issues, such as the nature of duty, the importance of non-violence, and the
relationship between the individual and the divine.

* The Islamic Quran (7th century CE) is the central religious text of Islam. The Quran
contains a number of ethical principles, such as the importance of justice, charity, and respect
for parents.

1
 KITS

* The Christian Bible (1st-4th centuries CE) is the central religious text of Christianity. The
Bible contains a number of ethical principles, such as the importance of love, forgiveness,
and compassion.

Need of Engineering Ethics

Engineering ethics is the application of ethical principles to the practice of engineering. It is

concerned with the moral obligations of engineers to society, to their clients, and to the
profession.

There are many reasons why engineering ethics is important. First, engineers have a
significant impact on the world around them. Their work can have a positive or negative
impact on people's safety, health, and well-being. Therefore, it is important that engineers act
ethically and responsibly.

Second, engineering is a complex and technical field. Engineers often have to make decisions
that involve trade-offs between different values. For example, an engineer might have to
decide whether to build a dam that would provide hydroelectric power but also flood a valley.
Engineering ethics can help engineers to make these decisions in a way that is ethical and
responsible.

Third, engineering is a rapidly changing field. New technologies are constantly emerging,
and engineers need to be aware of the ethical implications of these technologies. For
example, the development of artificial intelligence raises a number of ethical questions, such
as the potential for AI to be used for harmful purposes. Engineering ethics can help engineers
to understand and address these ethical challenges.

Here are some examples of ethical issues that engineers may face:

* **The safety of products and systems:** Engineers have a responsibility to ensure that
the products and systems they design are safe. This includes considering the potential for
harm to users, the environment, and society as a whole.

* **The use of technology:** Engineers need to be aware of the ethical implications of the
technologies they use. For example, they need to consider the potential for these technologies
to be used for harmful purposes.

* **The environment:** Engineers have a responsibility to protect the environment. This

includes considering the environmental impact of their work, and using resources
responsibly.

* **Intellectual property:** Engineers have a responsibility to respect the intellectual

property of others. This includes not plagiarizing the work of others, and giving credit where
credit is due.

* **Conflicts of interest:** Engineers need to avoid conflicts of interest. This means that
they should not let their personal interests or the interests of their employer influence their
professional judgment.

2
 KITS

These are just a few examples of the ethical issues that engineers may face. Engineering
ethics is a complex and challenging field, but it is essential for ensuring that engineers act in
an ethical and responsible manner.

Here are some additional examples of engineering ethics cases:

* The Ford Pinto: In the 1970s, Ford Motor Company knew that the Pinto had a design flaw
that could cause the car to catch fire in rear-end collisions. However, Ford decided to release
the car anyway, because it was more profitable to do so. This case raises questions about the
ethical obligations of engineers to protect the safety of the public.

* The Challenger disaster: In 1986, the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after
launch, killing all seven astronauts on board. The disaster was caused by a faulty O-ring seal,
which had been known to be a problem. This case raises questions about the ethical
obligations of engineers to report safety concerns to their superiors.

* The Deepwater Horizon oil spill: In 2010, an oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico,
causing the largest oil spill in U.S. history. The spill was caused by a number of factors,
including inadequate safety procedures and the use of faulty equipment. This case raises
questions about the ethical obligations of engineers to ensure the safety of their work.

These are just a few examples of the many engineering ethics cases that have occurred over
the years. These cases highlight the importance of engineering ethics, and they provide
lessons that can help engineers to avoid making similar mistakes in the future.

Senses of Engineering Ethics

some examples of the two senses of engineering ethics:

**Normative sense:** This sense of engineering ethics refers to the set of rules and
guidelines that engineers adhere to as a moral obligation to their profession and to the world.
These rules and guidelines are typically codified in codes of ethics, which are documents that
outline the ethical standards that engineers are expected to uphold.

For example, the **Code of Ethics for Engineers**, published by the National Society of
Professional Engineers (NSPE), states that engineers have a responsibility to "hold
paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public." This means that engineers must
always put the safety of others first, even if it means sacrificing their own personal interests
or the interests of their employer.

**Descriptive sense:** This sense of engineering ethics refers to the way that engineers
actually behave in practice. This includes the values and beliefs that engineers hold, the
decisions that they make, and the actions that they take. The descriptive sense of engineering
ethics is often more complex and nuanced than the normative sense, as it takes into account
the real-world factors that can influence engineers' behavior.

For example, an engineer might be faced with a situation where they have to choose between
two options, one of which is more ethical but the other of which is more profitable. In this

3
 KITS

case, the engineer would need to weigh the ethical implications of both options, as well as the
potential consequences of their decision. The descriptive sense of engineering ethics would
help the engineer to understand the factors that are relevant to this decision, and to make a
decision that is both ethical and responsible.

Here are some additional examples of the two senses of engineering ethics:

* **Normative sense:** An engineer who refuses to sign off on a design that they believe is
unsafe is upholding the normative sense of engineering ethics.

* **Descriptive sense:** An engineer who chooses to work for a company that is known for
its unethical practices is violating the descriptive sense of engineering ethics.

It is important to note that the two senses of engineering ethics are not mutually exclusive. In
fact, they often overlap. For example, an engineer who upholds the normative sense of
engineering ethics is more likely to behave in a way that is consistent with the descriptive
sense of engineering ethics.

Examples of professions and professionalism:

Profession:

A profession is a type of occupation or career that requires specialized training, education,

and expertise. It typically involves providing specific services or expertise to others and is
governed by a set of ethical standards and codes of conduct. Here are some examples of
professions:

1. Medical Doctor: Physicians who diagnose and treat illnesses, injuries, and medical
conditions to promote health and well-being.

2. Lawyer: Legal professionals who provide legal advice, represent clients in court, and
handle various legal matters.

3. Engineer: Professionals who design, build, and maintain various structures, systems, and
technologies.

4. Teacher: Educators who impart knowledge and skills to students in schools and
educational institutions.

5. Accountant: Financial experts who prepare and analyze financial records, offer tax advice,
and audit financial statements.

6. Architect: Professionals who design and plan buildings and other structures, considering
aesthetics, safety, and functionality.

7. Psychologist: Mental health professionals who study human behavior, emotions, and
cognition and provide therapy and counseling.

4
 KITS

8. Software Developer: Experts who design, develop, and maintain computer software and
applications.

Professionalism:

Professionalism refers to the behavior, conduct, and attitude that individuals display in their
respective professions. It involves adhering to ethical standards, acting with integrity, and
demonstrating competence in their work. Here are some examples of professionalism in
various settings:

1. Punctuality: Arriving on time for meetings, appointments, and work-related events,

showing respect for others' time and commitments.

2. Dress Code: Dressing appropriately and professionally according to the requirements of

the workplace or industry.

3. Communication: Maintaining clear, respectful, and effective communication with

colleagues, clients, and superiors.

4. Respect and Courtesy: Treating others with respect, politeness, and courtesy, regardless of
their position or background.

5. Accountability: Taking responsibility for one's actions and admitting mistakes, as well as
working to rectify them.

6. Continuous Learning: Staying up-to-date with the latest advancements and developments
in the profession through ongoing education and training.

7. Teamwork: Collaborating effectively with colleagues and valuing their input and
contributions.

8. Ethical Conduct: Upholding ethical principles and following the code of conduct relevant
to the profession.

These are just a few examples, and professionalism can manifest in various ways depending
on the specific profession and its associated norms and values.

Self Interest

Self-interest refers to the pursuit of one's own personal benefits, desires, or well-being. It is a
natural and fundamental aspect of human behavior and can manifest in various situations.
Here are some examples of self-interest:

1. Career Advancement: A professional seeking a promotion or a raise by consistently

performing well and taking on additional responsibilities.

2. Business Ventures: An entrepreneur starting a new business with the aim of making
profits and achieving financial success.

5
 KITS

3. Investing: An individual investing money in stocks, real estate, or other assets to grow
their wealth and secure their financial future.

4. Negotiations: During negotiations, each party advocating for their interests and trying to
secure the best deal possible for themselves.

5. Academic Success: Students studying hard and striving for good grades to enhance their
academic records and improve their future prospects.

6. Charity and Volunteering: People engaging in charitable activities or volunteering to feel

a sense of personal fulfillment and satisfaction.

7. Healthy Lifestyle Choices: Making choices that prioritize personal health and well-being,
such as exercising, eating nutritious food, and getting enough rest.

8. Social Relationships: Seeking friendships and relationships that bring joy, emotional
support, and happiness to one's life.

9. Personal Goals: Pursuing hobbies, interests, and passions that provide personal fulfillment
and a sense of accomplishment.

10. Time Management: Allocating time efficiently to balance personal and professional
responsibilities and achieve personal objectives.

It's important to note that self-interest doesn't necessarily imply selfishness or disregard for
others. Often, individuals find ways to align their self-interest with the well-being of others
and the broader community.

Healthy self-interest can be a driving force for personal growth and success, and it can also
contribute positively to the collective welfare. However, when self-interest becomes
excessive and disregards the rights and needs of others, it can lead to negative consequences
and ethical dilemmas. Finding a balance between self-interest and consideration for others is
key to maintaining a harmonious and thriving society.

Moral autonomy is the capacity to make one's own moral decisions, free from the influence
of others. It is often seen as a key component of moral agency, or the ability to act morally.

There are many examples of moral autonomy in everyday life. For example, when we make a
decision about whether or not to do something, we are exercising our moral autonomy. We
are weighing the different options available to us, considering the potential consequences of
our actions, and ultimately making a decision based on our own moral beliefs.

Here are some other examples of moral autonomy:

* **A person who decides to donate their organs after death is exercising their moral
autonomy.** They are making a decision about what to do with their own body, free from the
influence of others.

6
 KITS

* **A teenager who decides to stay in school instead of dropping out is exercising their moral
autonomy.** They are making a decision about their own future, free from the influence of
their peers or their parents.

* **A soldier who refuses to follow an order that they believe is unethical is exercising their
moral autonomy.** They are making a decision about what they believe is right, even if it
means going against the orders of their superiors.

These are just a few examples of moral autonomy in everyday life. Moral autonomy is a
complex concept, but it is an essential part of what it means to be a moral agent.

Here are some additional thoughts on moral autonomy:

* **Moral autonomy is not absolute.** We are all influenced by our upbringing, our culture,
and our relationships with others. However, moral autonomy is important because it allows
us to make our own choices about how we want to live our lives.

* **Moral autonomy is not always easy.** Sometimes, it can be difficult to make moral
decisions, especially when there are no easy answers. However, it is important to remember
that we have the capacity to make our own choices, and that we should not let others make
our moral decisions for us.

Utilitarianism is a theory of ethics that judges the morality of an action based on its
consequences. The theory was first developed by Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century, and it
has been further developed by John Stuart Mill in the 19th century.

The basic idea of utilitarianism is that the right action is the one that produces the greatest
good for the greatest number of people. This means that we should act in a way that will
maximize happiness and minimize suffering.

There are two main types of utilitarianism: act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act
utilitarianism judges the morality of an action based on its individual consequences. Rule
utilitarianism judges the morality of an action based on the rules that would produce the
greatest good for the greatest number of people.

Here are some examples of utilitarianism in action:

* **A doctor who saves the life of a patient is acting in a utilitarian way.** The doctor is
increasing the happiness of the patient and their family, and they are also reducing the
suffering of the patient.

* **A government that provides food stamps to the poor is acting in a utilitarian way.** The
government is increasing the happiness of the poor, and they are also reducing the suffering
of the poor.

* **A company that pollutes the environment is not acting in a utilitarian way.** The
company is increasing the suffering of people who live near the pollution, and they are also
decreasing the happiness of people who enjoy the environment.

7
 KITS

These are just a few examples of utilitarianism in action. Utilitarianism is a complex theory,
but it can be a helpful way to think about moral decisions.

Here are some additional thoughts on utilitarianism:

* **Utilitarianism is not always easy to apply.** Sometimes, it can be difficult to predict the
consequences of our actions.

* **Utilitarianism can be criticized for being too simplistic.** Some people argue that there
are other factors that should be considered when making moral decisions, such as justice and
fairness.

* **Utilitarianism can be criticized for being too individualistic.** Some people argue that
utilitarianism does not take into account the needs of the community as a whole.

Despite these criticisms, utilitarianism remains a popular theory of ethics. It is a helpful way
to think about moral decisions, and it can help us to make choices that will benefit the
greatest number of people.

Virtue theory is a theory of ethics that judges the morality of an action based on the
character of the person who performs the action. The theory was first developed by Aristotle
in the 4th century BCE, and it has been further developed by philosophers such as Thomas
Aquinas and Alasdair MacIntyre.

The basic idea of virtue theory is that the right action is the one that is performed by a
virtuous person. A virtuous person is someone who has the right character traits, such as
courage, temperance, justice, and wisdom. These character traits are called virtues, and they
are essential for living a good life.

Here are some examples of virtue theory in action:

* **A soldier who risks their life to save their comrades is acting in a virtuous way.** The
soldier is showing courage, which is a virtue.

* **A person who gives up their seat on the bus to an elderly person is acting in a virtuous
way.** The person is showing kindness, which is a virtue.

* **A judge who upholds the law even when it is unpopular is acting in a virtuous way.**
The judge is showing justice, which is a virtue.

These are just a few examples of virtue theory in action. Virtue theory is a complex theory,
but it can be a helpful way to think about moral decisions.

Here are some additional thoughts on virtue theory:

* **Virtue theory is not always easy to apply.** Sometimes, it can be difficult to determine
whether or not someone has a particular virtue.

8
 KITS

* **Virtue theory can be criticized for being too vague.** Some people argue that virtue
theory does not provide enough specific guidance on how to make moral decisions.

* **Virtue theory can be criticized for being too individualistic.** Some people argue that
virtue theory does not take into account the needs of the community as a whole.

Despite these criticisms, virtue theory remains a popular theory of ethics. It is a helpful way
to think about moral decisions, and it can help us to become more virtuous people.

Here are some of the virtues that are often discussed in virtue theory:

* **Courage:** The ability to face danger or difficulty without fear.

* **Temperance:** The ability to control one's emotions and desires.

* **Justice:** The ability to give each person their due.

* **Wisdom:** The ability to make good decisions.

* **Kindness:** The ability to be compassionate and helpful to others.

* **Humility:** The ability to recognize one's own limitations.

* **Honesty:** The ability to be truthful and trustworthy.

* **Integrity:** The ability to live in accordance with one's values.

These are just a few of the many virtues that have been discussed by philosophers. Virtue
theory is a complex theory, but it can be a helpful way to think about moral decisions and to
become a more virtuous person.

Ethical theories can be used in a variety of ways, including:

* **To help us make moral decisions.** Ethical theories can provide us with a framework
for thinking about moral problems and making moral decisions. They can help us to identify
the relevant factors to consider, to weigh the different options, and to make a decision that is
consistent with our values.

* **To understand the ethical implications of our actions.** Ethical theories can help us
to understand the potential ethical implications of our actions, both for ourselves and for
others. They can help us to identify the potential harms and benefits of our actions, and to
make sure that we are acting in a way that is consistent with our values.

* **To justify our moral beliefs.** Ethical theories can help us to justify our moral beliefs
to ourselves and to others. They can provide us with a framework for explaining why we
believe what we believe, and for defending our beliefs against challenges.

* **To develop our moral character.** Ethical theories can help us to develop our moral
character by providing us with guidance on how to live a good life. They can help us to

9
 KITS

identify the virtues that we should cultivate, and to develop the habits that will enable us to
live a virtuous life.

Here are some examples of how ethical theories can be used in different contexts:

* **In business:** Ethical theories can be used to help businesses make decisions about
things like product safety, environmental impact, and employee treatment.

* **In healthcare:** Ethical theories can be used to help healthcare professionals make
decisions about things like end-of-life care, organ donation, and medical research.

* **In politics:** Ethical theories can be used to help politicians make decisions about
things like war, poverty, and social justice.

* **In personal life:** Ethical theories can be used to help us make decisions about things
like relationships, work, and everyday choices.

Ethical theories are a valuable tool for understanding and making moral decisions. They can
help us to live a good life, and to make the world a better place.

Deontology is a theory

Deontology is a theory of ethics that judges the morality of an action based on whether or
not the action follows a set of moral rules. The theory was first developed by Immanuel Kant
in the 18th century.

The basic idea of deontology is that there are certain moral duties that we have, and that we
should act in accordance with these duties regardless of the consequences. These moral duties
are often called **imperatives**, and they can be either positive or negative. Positive
imperatives tell us what we should do, while negative imperatives tell us what we should not
do.

Here are some examples of deontological imperatives:

* **Do not lie.**

* **Do not steal.**

* **Do not kill.**

* **Help those in need.**

* **Be honest.**

* **Be fair.**

* **Be just.**

These are just a few examples of deontological imperatives. There are many other moral
duties that could be included on this list.

10
 KITS

Deontology is a complex theory, but it can be a helpful way to think about moral decisions. It
can help us to identify the moral duties that we have, and to make sure that we are acting in
accordance with these duties.

Here are some examples of deontology in action:

* **A person who refuses to lie to the police even though they know that the truth will get
their friend in trouble is acting in a deontological way.** The person is following the moral
duty to tell the truth, even though it may have negative consequences.

* **A soldier who refuses to shoot an unarmed civilian even though they are ordered to do so
is acting in a deontological way.** The soldier is following the moral duty to not kill, even
though it may put their own life in danger.

* **A person who donates money to charity even though they cannot afford to do so is acting
in a deontological way.** The person is following the moral duty to help those in need, even
though it may be difficult for them to do so.

These are just a few examples of deontology in action. Deontology is a complex theory, but it
can be a helpful way to think about moral decisions.

Here are some additional thoughts on deontology:

* **Deontology can be criticized for being too rigid.** Some people argue that deontology
does not take into account the specific circumstances of a situation.

* **Deontology can be criticized for being too idealistic.** Some people argue that
deontology is unrealistic, and that it is impossible to always act in accordance with moral
duties.

Despite these criticisms, deontology remains a popular theory of ethics. It is a helpful way to
think about moral decisions, and it can help us to make choices that are consistent with our
values.

Different types of inquiry

There are many different types of inquiry, each with its own purpose and methodology. Here
are a few examples:

* **Descriptive inquiry:** This type of inquiry seeks to describe the world as it is. It is often
used in the social sciences, where researchers want to understand how people behave and
interact.

* **Explanatory inquiry:** This type of inquiry seeks to explain why things happen. It is
often used in the natural sciences, where researchers want to understand the underlying
causes of natural phenomena.

11
 KITS

* **Evaluative inquiry:** This type of inquiry seeks to evaluate the worth of something. It is
often used in education, where researchers want to assess the effectiveness of a particular
teaching method.

* **Critical inquiry:** This type of inquiry seeks to critique something. It is often used in the
humanities, where researchers want to challenge the assumptions that underlie a particular
text or idea.

* **Action inquiry:** This type of inquiry seeks to improve the world. It is often used in
social work, where practitioners want to develop new interventions to help people in need.

These are just a few examples of the many different types of inquiry. Each type of inquiry has
its own strengths and weaknesses, and the best type of inquiry for a particular problem will
depend on the specific circumstances.

Here are some examples of how different types of inquiry can be used in different contexts:

* **A descriptive inquiry might be used to study the behavior of animals in their natural
habitat.**

* **An explanatory inquiry might be used to study the causes of climate change.**

* **An evaluative inquiry might be used to assess the effectiveness of a new drug
treatment.**

* **A critical inquiry might be used to critique the assumptions underlying a particular
theory of economics.**

* **An action inquiry might be used to develop a new program to help people who are
homeless.**

These are just a few examples of how different types of inquiry can be used in different
contexts. Inquiry is a powerful tool for understanding the world and making it a better place.

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

Lawrence Kohlberg was a psychologist who developed a theory of moral development,

known as Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development. He proposed that individuals progress
through distinct stages of moral reasoning, with each stage building upon the previous one.
Kohlberg's theory consists of six stages grouped into three levels: pre-conventional,
conventional, and post-conventional morality. Let's explore each level with examples:

1. Pre-Conventional Morality:

At this level, moral reasoning is based on external consequences and the desire to avoid
punishment or gain rewards.

- Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation

12
 KITS

Example: A child refuses to steal a toy from a store because they fear getting caught and
being punished by their parents.

- Stage 2: Individualism and Exchange

Example: A teenager helps a friend with their homework in the hope that the friend will
return the favor in the future.

2. Conventional Morality:

At this level, moral reasoning is influenced by societal norms, rules, and expectations.

- Stage 3: Interpersonal Relationships

Example: A person follows the rules and laws to gain approval and maintain good
relationships with others.

- Stage 4: Maintaining Social Order

Example: An individual pays taxes and obeys laws not only to gain approval but also to
contribute to the functioning and stability of society.

3. Post-Conventional Morality:

At this level, moral reasoning is based on internalized ethical principles and individual
beliefs, which may conflict with societal norms.

- Stage 5: Social Contract and Individual Rights

Example: A person advocates for changes in laws or policies that they believe are unjust or
infringe upon individual rights.

- Stage 6: Universal Principles

Example: An individual adheres to a personal code of ethics, even if it conflicts with the law,
to uphold fundamental moral principles such as justice, equality, and human rights.

It's important to note that not everyone progresses through all the stages, and individuals may
operate at different levels depending on the context and the complexity of the moral dilemma
they face. Kohlberg's theory has been widely influential in the field of psychology and ethics,
as it helps in understanding how individuals develop their moral reasoning and ethical
decision-making abilities over time. However, it has also been criticized for its cultural bias
and the limited focus on other aspects of moral development, such as empathy and emotions.

- Gilligan’sArgument

Carol Gilligan, an American psychologist, is known for her work on gender and moral
development. She presented an alternative perspective to Lawrence Kohlberg's theory,
suggesting that there are gender-based differences in moral reasoning. Gilligan argued that
women tend to emphasize care and relationships in their ethical decision-making, whereas

13
 KITS

men often prioritize principles of justice and rights. Here are some examples illustrating
Gilligan's argument:

1. Moral Dilemma - Stealing Medicine:

Scenario: A woman is faced with a moral dilemma. Her child is sick, and the only way to
afford the necessary medicine is to steal it.

Gilligan's Argument: In this situation, a woman might prioritize the care and well-being of
her child, considering the consequences of not stealing the medicine. She might weigh the
importance of preserving her relationship with her child and choose to steal the medicine to
ensure her child's health and safety.

2. Moral Dilemma - Breaking a Promise:

Scenario: A man has promised to help a friend move on a particular day, but he receives a
work opportunity that could significantly advance his career on the same day.

Gilligan's Argument: In this case, a man might prioritize principles of fairness and justice. He
might feel obliged to keep his promise to his friend because he values principles like loyalty,
trustworthiness, and fulfilling commitments over his personal gains.

3. Moral Dilemma - Reporting a Co-Worker's Mistake:

Scenario: A woman discovers that her co-worker made a significant error that could
negatively impact the company's reputation. Reporting the mistake might lead to disciplinary
action for the co-worker.

Gilligan's Argument: In this situation, a woman might consider the care and well-being of her
co-worker as well as the potential consequences of reporting the error. She might take into
account the impact on their working relationship and the ethical dilemma of balancing loyalty
to her colleague with her responsibility to the company.

4. Moral Dilemma - Witnessing an Accident:

Scenario: A man witnesses a hit-and-run accident. The driver responsible for the accident is a
close friend of the man.

Gilligan's Argument: In this case, a man might grapple with conflicting feelings of loyalty
and care for his friend versus the need for justice and accountability. He may struggle to
balance the care and concern for his friend with the moral obligation to report the incident
and uphold principles of justice.

Gilligan's argument highlights the importance of considering care and relationships as

essential elements in moral reasoning, especially in women's ethical decision-making. It
challenges the notion that justice and rights are the sole basis of ethical judgments and
emphasizes the significance of understanding how gender and social context can influence
moral development.

14
 KITS

Heinz's Dilemma

Heinz's Dilemma is a famous moral dilemma presented by Lawrence Kohlberg to study

moral development. It is often used to assess an individual's level of moral reasoning. The
dilemma goes as follows:

**Heinz's Dilemma:**

Heinz's wife is terminally ill and is in desperate need of a specific expensive medicine to
survive. The pharmacist is charging ten times the actual cost of the drug. Heinz cannot afford
to buy the medicine and has tried all legal means to get help, but nobody is willing to assist.
Desperate to save his wife, Heinz considers stealing the medicine.

Participants are then asked whether Heinz should steal the medicine or not, and to explain
their reasoning behind the decision.

The responses to Heinz's Dilemma can be classified into different stages of moral reasoning
according to Kohlberg's theory. Here are examples of how individuals might respond at
different stages:

1. **Pre-Conventional Level:**

- Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation

Response: "Heinz should not steal the medicine because stealing is against the law, and he
will go to jail if he gets caught."

- Stage 2: Individualism and Exchange

Response: "Heinz should steal the medicine because his wife's life is more important than
obeying the law, and he can pay back the pharmacist later."

2. **Conventional Level:**

- Stage 3: Interpersonal Relationships

Response: "Heinz should steal the medicine because he loves his wife, and he has a duty to
protect her and make her happy."

- Stage 4: Maintaining Social Order

Response: "Heinz should not steal the medicine because it would lead to chaos and people
stealing whenever they face a problem."

3. **Post-Conventional Level:**

- Stage 5: Social Contract and Individual Rights

Response: "Heinz should steal the medicine because everyone has the right to life, and the
pharmacist is being unfair by profiting from someone's suffering."

15
 KITS

- Stage 6: Universal Principles

Response: "Heinz should steal the medicine because preserving human life is a higher moral
duty than respecting property rights or laws."

The responses vary based on an individual's level of moral development, with higher stages
indicating more advanced and complex moral reasoning. Kohlberg's Dilemma provides
insight into how people approach moral dilemmas and make decisions based on their
underlying moral principles and values.

Comparison with Standard Experiments

Sure, here is a comparison of standard experiments and engineering ethics experiments:

| **Standard Experiments** | **Engineering Ethics Experiments** |

|---|---|

| **Purpose** | To test a hypothesis or theory | To explore the ethical implications of

engineering |

| **Methods** | Typically use controlled experiments with a limited number of variables |

Often use case studies or simulations that allow for a more complex exploration of ethical
issues |

| **Participants** | Typically involve college students or other volunteers | May involve

engineers, engineering students, or other stakeholders |

| **Setting** | Typically conducted in a laboratory or other controlled setting | May be

conducted in the field or in a simulated setting |

| **Strengths** | Can be used to test specific hypotheses or theories | Can provide a more
nuanced and complex understanding of ethical issues |

| **Weaknesses** | Can be artificial and unrealistic | Can be difficult to generalize the results
to real-world situations |

Here are some additional thoughts on the comparison between standard experiments and
engineering ethics experiments:

* **Standard experiments** are typically used to test specific hypotheses or theories. They
are often conducted in a laboratory or other controlled setting, and they typically involve a
limited number of variables. This makes them well-suited for testing specific questions, but it
can also make them artificial and unrealistic.

* **Engineering ethics experiments** are often used to explore the ethical implications of
engineering. They may involve case studies, simulations, or other methods that allow for a
more complex exploration of ethical issues. This makes them well-suited for understanding

16
 KITS

the nuances of ethical issues, but it can also make them more difficult to conduct and
interpret.

Ultimately, the best type of experiment for a particular research question will depend on the
specific goals of the research. If the goal is to test a specific hypothesis or theory, then a
standard experiment may be the best option. If the goal is to explore the ethical implications
of engineering, then an engineering ethics experiment may be the best option.

.Codes of ethics play an important role in engineering. They provide a framework for
engineers to make ethical decisions, and they help to ensure that engineers behave in a
professional and responsible manner.

There are many different codes of ethics for engineers, but they typically share some
common features. These features include:

* **A commitment to safety and public welfare.** Codes of ethics typically emphasize the
importance of safety and public welfare. Engineers are expected to design and build safe
products and systems, and they are also expected to consider the potential impact of their
work on the public.

* **A commitment to honesty and integrity.** Codes of ethics also emphasize the
importance of honesty and integrity. Engineers are expected to be honest in their dealings
with clients, colleagues, and the public. They are also expected to uphold the highest
standards of professional conduct.

* **A commitment to social responsibility.** Codes of ethics increasingly emphasize the

importance of social responsibility. Engineers are expected to consider the impact of their
work on society as a whole, and they are expected to use their skills to help solve social
problems.

Here are some examples of codes of ethics for engineers:

* **The **Code of Ethics for Engineers**, published by the National Society of Professional
Engineers (NSPE).

* **The **Engineer's Code of Ethics**, published by the American Society of Civil

Engineers (ASCE).

* **The **Code of Ethics for Professional Engineers**, published by the Engineers Canada.

These are just a few examples of codes of ethics for engineers. There are many other codes of
ethics available, and the specific code that an engineer follows will depend on their
professional affiliation and the country in which they practice.

Codes of ethics are an important tool for ensuring that engineers behave in an ethical and
responsible manner. They provide a framework for making ethical decisions, and they help to
promote the values of safety, public welfare, honesty, integrity, and social responsibility.

17
 KITS

–Balanced Outlook on Law

A balanced outlook on law in ethics involves understanding the interplay between the legal
system and ethical principles. It acknowledges that while laws are necessary for maintaining
social order and regulating human behavior, they may not always align perfectly with ethical
standards.

Experimental Nature of Engineering:

Engineering is an applied science that involves the practical application of scientific

principles to design, create, and improve systems, devices, and processes.

*****************************

18