Scribd
Upload
36 views7 pages

IBC 2016 Part II: Corporate Insolvency Guide

Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 outlines the processes for insolvency resolution and liquidation of corporate entities, including the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), liquidation, and voluntary liquidation. Key features include a creditor-driven approach, timelines for resolution, and the role of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) as the adjudicating authority. The section also addresses eligibility criteria, procedural requirements, and judicial interpretations related to insolvency proceedings.

Uploaded by

t7u7s7h7a7r7
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
36 views7 pages

IBC 2016 Part II: Corporate Insolvency Guide

Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 outlines the processes for insolvency resolution and liquidation of corporate entities, including the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), liquidation, and voluntary liquidation. Key features include a creditor-driven approach, timelines for resolution, and the role of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) as the adjudicating authority. The section also addresses eligibility criteria, procedural requirements, and judicial interpretations related to insolvency proceedings.

Uploaded by

t7u7s7h7a7r7
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Summary of Part II (Corporate Persons)

Part II of the IBC (Sections 4–77A) governs insolvency resolution and liquidation for corporate
persons, including companies and limited liability partnerships (LLPs), across seven chapters. This
summary provides an overview of key processes, timelines, eligibility, procedures, and judicial
interpretations, ensuring alignment with the ICAI CA Final Set C Module and updated regulations.

Chapter Overview
Part II comprises the following processes:

1. Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP): A creditor-driven process to revive viable


businesses or liquidate unviable ones, supervised by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
2. Liquidation Process: Initiated post-failed CIRP or creditor decision, involving asset realization and
distribution per priority.
3. Fast-Track CIRP (FTCIRP): A 90-day (extendable by 45 days) resolution process for smaller
entities.
4. Voluntary Liquidation: For solvent corporate persons without default, seeking to wind up
voluntarily.
5. Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP): A cost-effective, less disruptive process for
MSMEs, introduced via Ordinance on April 4, 2021 (Sections 54A–54P).
6. Offences and Penalties: Provisions addressing non-compliance under Part II.
7. Adjudicating Authority and Appeals: NCLT as the adjudicating authority, with appeals to NCLAT
and the Supreme Court.

Application of Part II (Section 4)


 Scope: Applies to insolvency, liquidation, bankruptcy, and voluntary liquidation of corporate
debtors where the minimum default is ₹1 crore (raised from ₹1 lakh via Gazette Notification,
March 24, 2020).
 PPIRP Threshold: Minimum default of ₹10 lakh (Gazette Notification, April 9, 2021).
 Adjudicating Authority: NCLT for corporate persons; Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) for non-
corporate insolvency (Section 60).

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)


CIRP is a time-bound, creditor-driven process under NCLT supervision to assess a corporate debtor’s
(CD) viability for revival or liquidation. The process is governed by Sections 6–32A, with a standard
timeline of 180 days (extendable by 90 days, up to a maximum of 330 days, including legal
proceedings, per CoC of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019)).

Process Flow
1. Filing Application: By financial creditor (FC), operational creditor (OC), or CD upon default (Section
6).
2. Adjudication: NCLT admits or rejects based on default evidence (Sections 7, 9, 10).
3. Moratorium and Public Announcement: Moratorium halts legal actions; announcement invites
creditor claims (Sections 13–15).
4. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP): Temporary overseer (Section 16).
5. Formation of Committee of Creditors (CoC): Comprises FCs; holds first meeting (Section 21).
6. Appointment of Resolution Professional (RP): Replaces IRP (Section 22).
7. Management by RP: Controls CD’s operations and assets (Section 17).
8. Appointment of Registered Valuers: For asset valuation (Section 25).
9. Preparation of Information Memorandum (IM): Details CD’s financial/operational status (Section
29).
10. Invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI): Invites resolution applicants (Regulation 36A).
11. Submission of EOIs: By prospective applicants.
12. Provisional and Final List of Resolution Applicants: Prepared by RP (Regulation 36A).
13. Issuance of Request for Resolution Plan (RFRP): Includes IM and evaluation matrix (Regulation
36B).
14. Submission of Resolution Plans: By eligible applicants (Section 30).
15. CoC Approval/Rejection: CoC evaluates plans with ≥66% voting share (Section 30(4)).
16. NCLT Approval/Rejection: Final approval; rejection leads to liquidation (Section 31).

Key Features
- Trigger: Default (non-payment of due debt, Section 3(12)).
- Outcome: Approved resolution plan revives CD; failure leads to liquidation (Section 33).
- Moratorium: Protects CD from legal actions during CIRP (Section 14).

Initiation of CIRP (Section 6)


- Eligible Initiators: FC, OC, or CD upon default.
- Default Definition: Non-payment of debt when due and payable (Section 3(12)).

CIRP by Financial Creditor (Section 7)


1. Filing Application (Section 7(1)):
- FC (individually/jointly) or authorized persons (e.g., guardian, trustee) files with NCLT.
- For securities/deposits or real estate allottees: Requires ≥100 creditors/allottees or 10% of total,
whichever is less (Manish Kumar v. Union of India, 2021).
2. Application Requirements (Section 7(2–3)):
- Form 1 (IBBI Rules, 2016), ₹25,000 fee, and documents:
- Default evidence (e.g., information utility, bank records, court orders).
- Proposed IRP’s name.
- Debt chronology, PAN, email ID (Regulation 2A–2D).
- Assignee/transferee provides transfer agreement.
- Copy served to CD and IBBI.
3. Adjudication Timeline (Section 7(4)):
- NCLT ascertains default within 14 days; records reasons for delays.
4. Admission/Rejection (Section 7(5)):
- Admits if: Default exists, application complete, no RP disciplinary issues.
- Rejects if: No default, incomplete application, or RP disciplinary issues.
- 7-day rectification notice (directory, per Surendra Trading Company v. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute
Mills, 2017).
5. Commencement (Section 7(6)):
- CIRP starts on admission date.
6. Communication (Section 7(7)):
- NCLT communicates decision to FC and CD within 7 days.
7. Judicial Interpretations:
- Sunrise 14 A/S Denmark v. Ravi Mahajan (2018): Foreign FCs exempt from statutory form; can file
via advocate.
- Forech India Ltd. v. Edelweiss ARC (2019): CIRP independent of winding-up proceedings.
- Manish Kumar v. Union of India (2021): Allotment means documented booking; default need not
be to applicant.

---

CIRP by Operational Creditor (Sections 8–9)


Demand Notice (Section 8)
1. Issuance (Section 8(1)):
- OC delivers demand notice (Form 3) or invoice with notice (Form 4) to CD upon default (Rule 5,
IBBI Application Rules, 2016).
- Delivery: At CD’s registered office (hand, post, email).
- Copy filed with information utility.
2. CD’s Response (Section 8(2)):
- Within 10 days, CD notifies OC of dispute or payment proof (e.g., electronic transfer, encashed
cheque).
3. Judicial Interpretations:
- Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software (2017): Dispute must be genuine, not illusory.
- Vishal Vijay Kalantri (2020): Dispute must be factual, not hypothetical.
- Macquarie Bank v. Shilpi Cable (2017): OC’s agent/lawyer can issue notice.
- K. Kishan v. Vijay Nirman (2018): IBC not for premature debt enforcement.
- Seema Gupta v. Supreme Infrastructure (2017): Demand notice mandatory.

Application for CIRP (Section 9)


1. Filing (Section 9(1–2)):
- If no payment/dispute notice within 10 days, OC files in Form 5 (Rule 6) with ₹2,000 fee.
- Copy served to CD and IBBI.
2. Documents (Section 9(3)):
- Demand notice/invoice copy.
- Affidavit confirming no dispute notice.
- Non-payment proof (e.g., financial institution certificate, information utility).
- Debt chronology (Regulation 2D).
3. Admission/Rejection (Section 9(5)):
- Admits if: Application complete, no payment, notice delivered, no dispute, no RP issues.
- Rejects if: Incomplete, debt paid, notice not delivered, dispute exists, or RP issues.
- 7-day rectification notice.
4. Judicial Interpretations:
- Macquarie Bank (2017): Financial institution certificate not mandatory.
- Excel Metal v. Union of India (2019): CIRP for resolution, not recovery.
- Mother Pride v. Union of India (2017): Post-admission withdrawal not allowed by OC.

---

CIRP by Corporate Applicant (Section 10)


1. Filing (Section 10(1–2)):
- CD files in Form 6 (Rule 7) with ₹25,000 fee upon default.
- Copy served to IBBI.
2. Documents (Section 10(3)):
- Books of account.
- Proposed IRP details.
- Special resolution (shareholders) or 3/4th partner resolution.
3. Admission/Rejection (Section 10(4)):
- Admits if complete and no RP issues; rejects if incomplete or RP issues.
- 7-day rectification notice.
4. Judicial Interpretation:
- Export-Import Bank v. Resolution Professional (2018): Shareholders approve CIRP filing.

---

Suspension of CIRP Initiation (Section 10A)


- Bar: No CIRP applications under Sections 7, 9, or 10 for defaults from March 25, 2020, for 6
months, extended to March 25, 2021 (Notification, December 22, 2020).
- Scope: Applies to defaults post-March 25, 2020; pre-existing defaults unaffected.
- Judicial Interpretations:
- Ramesh Kymal v. Siemens Gamesa (2021): Bar applies only to post-March 25, 2020 defaults.
- Beetel Teletech v. ArcelorMittal (2022): Interest accrued during suspension can meet threshold.

---

Persons Not Entitled to Initiate CIRP (Section 11)


- Restricted Entities:
- CD undergoing CIRP/PPIRP.
- FC/OC of CD in PPIRP.
- CD completed CIRP/PPIRP within 12 months.
- CD/FC violating approved resolution plan within 12 months.
- CD under liquidation.
- Judicial Interpretations:
- Forech India (2019): Liquidation bars Section 10 applications, but Sections 7/9 allowed until
liquidation order.
- Manish Kumar (2021): Prevents CD self-abuse.

---

Disposal of Applications (Section 11A)


- Priority:
- PPIRP applications (Section 54C) decided before Sections 7, 9, or 10.
- PPIRP filed within 14 days of Sections 7, 9, or 10 prioritizes PPIRP.
- PPIRP filed after 14 days prioritizes Sections 7, 9, or 10.
- Exception: Does not apply to pending applications as of IBC Amendment Act, 2021.

---

Time-Limit for CIRP Completion (Section 12)


1. Standard Period: 180 days from admission.
2. Extension: Up to 90 days (once) with CoC (≥66% vote) and NCLT approval.
3. Mandatory Completion: Within 330 days, including legal proceedings.
4. Judicial Interpretations:
- Innoventive Industries (2017): Time critical for revival.
- ArcelorMittal (2018): Section 12 mandatory.

---

Withdrawal of Application (Section 12A)


- Process: Withdrawal with ≥90% CoC vote.
- Regulation 30A:
- Before CoC: Applicant applies via IRP within 3 days.
- After CoC: CoC considers within 7 days; RP submits with approval.
- Form FA with bank guarantee for expenses.
- Post-EOI withdrawal requires justification.
- Judicial Interpretations:
- Swiss Ribbons (2019): Pre-CoC withdrawal via NCLT’s inherent powers.
- Brilliant Alloys (2018): Regulation 30A directory.

---

Moratorium and Public Announcement (Section 13–15)


1. Moratorium (Section 14):
- Prohibits suits, asset transfers, security enforcement, or property recovery.
- Essential goods/services protected; licenses not suspended if dues paid.
- Duration: From admission to CIRP completion or liquidation.
- Judicial Interpretations:
- P. Mohanraj v. Shah Brothers (2021): Section 138 NI Act proceedings barred as they deplete CD
assets.
- Swiss Ribbons (2019): Preserves CD assets.
2. Public Announcement (Section 15):
- Made within 3 days of IRP appointment in Form A (Regulation 6).
- Published in newspapers, CD’s website, and IBBI platform.
- Specifies claim submission deadline (14 days).

---

Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) (Sections 16–20)


1. Appointment (Section 16):
- NCLT appoints IRP on admission; proposed RP appointed if no disciplinary issues.
- IBBI recommends IP within 10 days if needed.
2. Duties (Section 18):
- Collect CD information, receive claims, form CoC, manage assets, and file with information utility.
3. Management (Section 17):
- IRP manages CD affairs; board powers suspended.
4. Cooperation (Section 19):
- CD personnel must assist IRP; non-compliance reported to NCLT.
5. Going Concern (Section 20):
- IRP protects CD value and manages operations.
6. Judicial Interpretation:
- State Bank of India v. Metenere Ltd. (2020): Ex-employee of FC ineligible as IRP.

---

Resolution Professional (RP) (Sections 22–29)


1. Appointment (Section 22):
- CoC appoints IRP as RP or replaces with ≥66% vote.
2. Duties (Section 25):
- Preserve CD assets, manage operations, prepare IM, invite plans, and file avoidance applications.
3. Information Memorandum (Section 29):
- Prepared by 95th day, includes financials, creditor list, and litigation details.
4. Judicial Interpretations:
- Swiss Ribbons (2019): RP has administrative powers, overseen by CoC and NCLT.

---

Committee of Creditors (CoC) (Section 21)


1. Composition:
- All FCs; related party FCs excluded unless regulated entities.
- If no FCs, CoC includes top 18 OCs, workmen, and employee representatives (Regulation 16).
2. Voting: Decisions require ≥51% voting share unless specified (e.g., ≥66% for plan approval).
3. Authorized Representative (Section 21(6A)):
- Represents large creditor classes; appointed by NCLT.
4. Judicial Interpretations:
- Phoenix Arc v. Spade Financial (2021): Collusive FCs excluded.

---

Resolution Plan (Sections 30–31)


1. Submission (Section 30):
- Plan submitted with Section 29A eligibility affidavit.
- RP confirms compliance with payment priorities and legal requirements.
2. CoC Approval: ≥66% vote based on feasibility and viability.
3. NCLT Approval (Section 31):
- Approves if compliant; binding on all stakeholders.
- Rejects if non-compliant, leading to liquidation.
4. Judicial Interpretations:
- K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank (2019): NCLT cannot evaluate CoC’s commercial decisions.
- Kalpraj Dharamshi v. Kotak Investment (2021): CoC’s wisdom paramount.

---

Liquidation Process (Sections 33–54)


1. Triggers (Section 33):
- No plan by CIRP deadline, CoC votes to liquidate, plan rejected, or CD violates approved plan.
2. Liquidator Appointment (Section 34):
- RP becomes liquidator unless replaced.
3. Duties (Section 35):
- Verify claims, manage assets, sell assets, and pursue legal actions.
4. Liquidation Estate (Section 36):
- Includes CD’s owned assets; excludes third-party assets.
5. Distribution (Section 53):
- Priority: Insolvency costs, workmen/secured creditors, employees, unsecured FCs, government
dues, others.
6. Dissolution (Section 54):
- NCLT orders dissolution post-liquidation; CD dissolved from order date.
7. Judicial Interpretations:
- Edelweiss ARC (2020): Liquidation mandatory if CoC decides unanimously.

---

Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) (Sections 54A–54P)


1. Eligibility (Section 54A):
- MSMEs with default ≥₹10 lakh, not in CIRP/liquidation, eligible under Section 29A.
2. Timeline (Section 54D):
- 120 days total; plan submitted to NCLT in 90 days.
3. Process:
- CD submits base plan; CoC approves or invites competing plans.
- NCLT approves (Section 54L) or terminates (Section 54N) within 30 days.
4. Moratorium (Section 54E):
- From admission to PPIRP completion.

---

Fast-Track CIRP (Sections 55–58)


1. Eligibility: Small companies, startups, or unlisted companies with assets ≤₹1 crore.
2. Timeline: 90 days, extendable by 45 days.
3. Process: Similar to CIRP but faster; follows Chapter II rules.

---

Voluntary Liquidation (Section 59)


1. Eligibility: Solvent corporate persons with no default.
2. Process:
- Directors declare solvency and no fraud intent.
- Special resolution and creditor approval (if debts exist).
- Liquidator winds up and applies for dissolution.
3. Timeline: Liquidation within 1 year (Regulation 44).

---

Offences and Penalties (Sections 65–77A)


- Fraudulent Initiation (Section 65): ₹1 lakh–₹1 crore penalty.
- Fraudulent Trading (Section 66): Liable persons contribute to debts.
- Concealment/Misconduct (Sections 68–73): 1–5 years imprisonment, ₹1 lakh–₹1 crore fine.
- Moratorium/Plan Violation (Section 74): 1–5 years imprisonment, ₹1 lakh–₹3 lakh fine.

---

Adjudicating Authority and Appeals (Sections 60–64)


1. NCLT (Section 60): Handles insolvency, liquidation, and guarantor cases.
2. Appeals (Section 61):
- To NCLAT within 30 days (extendable by 15 days).
- Grounds include legal violations or material irregularities.
3. Supreme Court (Section 62): Appeals within 45 days on questions of law.
4. Judicial Interpretations:
- Jaypee Kensington (2021): NCLT’s role limited to compliance check.

Key Judicial Interpretations


- Innoventive Industries (2017): Emphasized time-bound revival.
- Swiss Ribbons (2019): Upheld IBC’s constitutional validity and CoC’s commercial wisdom.
- ArcelorMittal (2018): Section 29A ensures ineligible persons are excluded.
- P. Mohanraj (2021): Moratorium bars Section 138 NI Act proceedings against CD.
- Anuj Jain (2020): Clarified preferential transaction rules.

---

IBBI Regulations
- CIRP Regulations (2016): Govern timelines, CoC meetings, and plan submissions.
- PPIRP Regulations (2021): Specify PPIRP timelines and CoC formation.
- Liquidation Regulations (2016): Detail liquidation timelines and asset sales.
- FTCIRP Regulations (2017): Outline fast-track processes.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The RP is appointed to manage the corporate debtor's operations, preserve assets, and oversee the resolution process . They prepare the Information Memorandum, invite resolution plans, and file avoidance applications . Judicial interpretation in Swiss Ribbons emphasizes that while RP holds substantial administrative responsibilities, their actions are under CoC's guidance and NCLT's supervision . NCLT's role is limited to ensuring compliance and does not extend to evaluating the RP's commercial judgements, maintaining the separation of powers within the CIRP framework .

The CIRP under the IBC mandates a standard timeline of 180 days, extendable by 90 days with approval, ensuring completion within 330 days, including legal proceedings . This time-bound requirement emphasizes rapid evaluation of the corporate debtor's viability for revival or liquidation, enforced by judicial interpretations highlighting the importance of time for revival, such as the Innoventive Industries case where timely action was deemed critical . Exceeding these timelines may undermine the process's efficiency and contradicts the mandatory nature of Section 12 as stated in cases like ArcelorMittal .

Judicial interpretations, particularly P. Mohanraj v. Shah Brothers, clarify that the moratorium during CIRP extends to proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act, which addresses cheque bounces . This interpretation prevents creditors from pursuing parallel legal actions that could deplete corporate debtor assets, thereby prioritizing collective recovery over individual creditor actions. The broader implication is a harmonized focus on resolution within the IBC framework, ensuring equitable distribution over unilateral recoveries .

IBC provisions impose penalties ranging from ₹1 lakh to ₹1 crore and imprisonment for fraudulent initiations, trading, concealment, and plan violations (Sections 65–74). These penalties deter misuse of insolvency processes and encourage compliance, thus enhancing integrity. By penalizing fraudulent behavior, the IBC ensures corporate governance and accountability, fostering trust in the insolvency framework and emphasizing that misuse of processes will incur strict consequences . Judicial interpretations reinforce these provisions' importance in maintaining the sanctity and efficacy of the insolvency regime .

The moratorium in CIRP, effective from admission until completion or liquidation, halts legal actions, asset transfers, and security enforcement against the debtor . This provision shields the debtor's assets from depletion, crucial for asset preservation during resolution. Judicial interpretations, like P. Mohanraj v. Shah Brothers, underscore the moratorium's role in preventing asset erosion through ongoing legal challenges, thus maintaining the debtor's capacity for revival . Swiss Ribbons further affirms that it ensures a conducive environment for equitable resolution by protecting stakeholder interests .

The 2020 suspension on CIRP initiation for defaults post-March 25, 2020, halted applications under Sections 7, 9, and 10 for 6 months, later extended . This measure was aimed at providing relief during the COVID-19 pandemic. Judicial interpretations, such as Ramesh Kymal v. Siemens Gamesa, clarified that this suspension only applies to defaults arising after the specified date, thus excluding pre-existing defaults . Furthermore, it does not prevent interest accrued during this period from meeting default thresholds, as noted in the Beetel Teletech case .

Voluntary liquidation applies to solvent corporate persons with no payment defaults seeking to dissolve. Eligibility requires directors' solvency declaration and creditors' approval if debts exist . The process involves a special resolution and the appointment of a liquidator who winds up affairs and applies for dissolution, typically completed within a year . This allows corporates to exit operations cleanly, ensuring creditor interests are addressed transparently, reflecting IBC's aim to facilitate orderly exits alongside resolving insolvency .

PPIRP for MSMEs requires a minimum default of ₹10 lakh and is eligible for MSMEs not undergoing CIRP or in liquidation . The process includes a 120-day timeline, with plan submission to NCLT within 90 days . The corporate debtor submits a base plan, and the CoC may approve it or invite competitive plans . NCLT evaluates the conducted process, balancing efficient resolution with minimal disruption to smaller enterprises, and approves or terminates the process within 30 days .

An operational creditor initiates CIRP by issuing a demand notice (Form 3 or 4) upon default. If no dispute or payment response is received within 10 days, the creditor files an application (Form 5) with necessary documents . Judicial interpretations guide this process, ensuring that disputes must be genuine and factual, not merely hypothetical, as ruled in Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software . This ensures a fair balance between creditor initiation and debtor protection.

The CoC, comprising all financial creditors, plays a pivotal role in evaluating resolution plans with a required approval of at least 66% voting share . This body assesses the feasibility and viability of plans, lifting the decision-making burden from NCLT, whose role is to ensure compliance rather than evaluate commercial decisions. The CoC's wisdom is deemed paramount, as emphasized in cases like Kalpraj Dharamshi v. Kotak Investment, why their decisions are binding on all stakeholders once approved .

You might also like