Questionnaire design
Please refer to Appendix …
Questionnaire design flow chart
Introduction
Awareness about interviewees
Group age (18-25)
(Q0b)
Australian
(Q0b) End
Yes
Yes
Willing to vote
(Q7 + Q10)
Kind of election interviewees participate (Q1) Information sources
Level of political knowledge (Q2) impact
Interest in politics (Q3) (Q8 + Q9)
Demographic
(Part C: Q13-Q19)
High
Satisfaction Confidence
(Q4) (Q5)
Low Review the last election
(Q11)
Instability Satisfaction
(Q12) (Q6)
This survey questionnaire measurement will focus on nominal scale and interval to
response the research objectives. These question (Q) 0, 1 and questions in part C
that used nominal scale to assigned to objects serve as labels for identification or
classification of voter demographics and standard interviewees (Zikmund et al.,
2014, p.251 )The other rest of questions are presented with the interval scale and
they were measured through 7-points numerical scale that consist from “strongly
disagree” to “strongly agree” (Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7, Q10) or from “hard
used at all” to “used all the times” (Q8) and from “hardly would use at all” to
“would use all the time” (Q9) to measure psychological attributes of interviewees
toward political voting decision (Zikmund et al., 2014, p.252 ).
Furthermore, a scale of subjective probability scale will be mix with Juster scale
which consist 11-point scale from 0 to 10 and ranging from 0 for “no chance” to
100 for “certair” that will be used to measure behaviour intensions that candidate
will vote for each party as their first selection (Zikmund et al., 2014, p.267).
Moreover, Question structure follow unstructured question are open-end in a part
of Q3, Q4, Q12, Fixed –alternative question or closed questions with simple-
dichotomy question in Q0, Frequency-determinant question, attitude scales and
mutually exclusive also will be used in other rest of questionnaire.
Zikmund, W, Alessandro, S, Winza, H, Lowe, B, & Babin, B 2014, Marketing
Research, 2nd edn, Cengage Learning, Australia.