CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Industrial relations has become one of the most delicate and complex
problems of modern industrial society. Industrial progress is impossible
without cooperation of labour and harmonies relationship. Therefore it is in
the interest of all to create and to maintain good relationship between
employees (labour) and employers (management). The term industrial
relation comprises of two terms, industrial and relations. Industry refers to
any productive activity in which an individual (or group of individuals) is
cared/engaged. By relation we mean the relationship that exist in the
industry between employer and his workmen.
According to Oha (1993), Industrial and labour relation is a sum total
of interactions and relationship of work that arise from an employment
contract whether written or oral. In the sense, industrial and labour relation
is concern mainly with the relationship and interactions between the
employee and employers or management.
According to Soeze cited in business lines of June 25 th – July 1st 2001,
he noted that industrial and labour relations does not necessarily mean that it
1
operates only in a factory setting. It takes place in any organization where
there are worker and employers. It can be departmental store, a university,
manufacturing company or religious organization. In other word, industrial
and labour relations is the moderation of the relation of the actors foe
improved understanding and industrial harmony.
Industrial relations has a broad as well as a narrow outlook, originally,
industrial relation was broadly define to include the relationships and
interaction between employees and employers. From this perspective
industrial relations covers all aspects of the employment relationship
including human resources management, employment relations and union
management (or labour) relations. Now its meaning has become more
specific and restricted. industrial relations pertains to study and practice of
collective bargaining, trade unionism and labour management relationship
and the personnel practices and policies of employers.
Effective production, however increasingly depend upon the
management and cooperation between group of employees whether in the
office or on the shop floor. The effect of the group of between the industrial
worker, within the group or between the group themselves is to vital
importance the extent to which they work in co-operation or in their conduct
of inter-union relations profoundly influences the atmosphere of production.
2
The level of output and the well-being of the interrelation economic
system. Good industrial relations improve the morals of the employees.
Employee work with great zeal with the feeling in mind that the interest of
employers and employees in one and the same i.e to increase production.
Every worker feel that he is a co-worker of the gains of the industry the
employer in his turn must realize that the gain of industry are not for him
alone but should be shared equally and generally with his workers.
In other words complete unity of taught and action is the main
achievement of industrial peace. It increase the place of workers in the
society and their ego is satisfied. It naturally affects production because
mighty cooperation efforts alone can produce great results.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
In Nigeria today, whether in public or private organization, there is a
common sense of high display of either linkeusam attitude to jobs or lack of
total or inadequate commitment to jobs on the part of employees, which
have in the final analysis led to poor and insufficient outputs. The observed
causal reasons for this development have been either due to inadequate
prescription and administration of motivational factors or outright wrong
3
application of factor. Below are some state problems associated with
industrial relations.
1. To know how communication affect industrial and labour relations.
2. To know the effect of appraisal on industrial and labour relations.
3. How does human resources develop and training help industrial and
labour relations.
4. Inadequate motivation of employees lead in industrial and labour relation
breakdown.
5. Does management apply the appropriate platform for negotiation?
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
1. To ascertain the effects of communication industrial and labour relations.
2. To highlight the effects of the appraisal on industrial and labour relations.
3. To know the effect o manpower development and training in industrial
and labour relations management.
4. To bring out the effect of motivation on industrial and labour relations.
5. To highlight the effect of appropriate platform for organization between
labour and management relations.
4
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTION
1. What is the effect of communication on industrial labour relations?
2. How does appraisal affect industrial and labour relation?
3. How does manpower development and training improve industrial and
labour relations?
4. Does motivation of employee bring productivity?
5. What are appropriate platform for negotiation between industrial and
labour relation.
1.5 SIGNIFICANT OF STUDY
The study have the following significant
1. The study help to draw worker in the organization to improve
productivity in the organization.
2. It help the organization on how to handle industrial and labour relations
in the public sector.
3. It will equally help management in the organization to examine the
dispute and how to solve the issues.
4. The study will help management of an organization in the smooth
running of the organization through industrial and labour relations.
5
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The research is subject to limitation usually face with research study these
include.
1. Financial and material limitations: These assist decisions. It is important
however to realize the limitations of material and financial reporting
when forming decisions.
2. Illiteracy of the respondents: This is the exact nature of the criticism
varies, so that illiteracy must be defined in each case before the term can
be used in a meaningful way. In 1990 U.S Burea of the causes defined
illiteracy as any person over ten years of age who was unable to read and
write in any language. By next census (19400, however, the concept of
“functional illiteracy was adopted and any person with less than five (5)
years of schooling was considered literate, or unable to engage in social
activities.
3. Inadequate time for the study: the inadequate treatment heads to
thousands of needless deaths each year, “said Dr, Elizabeth A McGlynn,
a researcher at the RAND Cooperation and an author of the study”, being
published today in the journal health affairs only a fundamental redesign
of the health system with improve the situation, Dr. McGlynn said adding
“it is a tremendous culture shift we are asking for”.
6
The study’s conclusion were based chiefly on a review of the medical
records of nearly 7000 people in 12 metropolitan areas, including Network,
Miami, and orange country Calif. On average, the author found patient
received substandard care, as defined by leading medical group 50 percent
60 percent of the time.
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERM
Motivation: It means a kind of power or force intrinsic in the individual that
energizes him/her in the performance of his/her job and as a result increase
productivity.
Organization: A deliberately established entity for the purpose of product of
goods and services towards the achievement of predetermined goals and
objectives.
Industrial and labour relation: It is the methodology of how employers and
employees collectively interact in organization to foster peace and harmony.
Effectiveness: The economic use of resources to achieve set goals promptly.
Productivity: The rate of output per specific time.
7
Organized labour: The collectivity of employees representative deliberately
pooled together to achieve result that the individual employee would not be
able to achieve.
Goals: Formally arranged set of aims and objectives agreed to be achieved at
a specific time.
Management: Members of staff of an organization at the top hierarchy
responsible for decision making.
Employers: The owner of an organization.
Employee: It is a person hired or engaged by an employee, which is obliged
under contract of service.
Performance: This is the act of measuring of the effectiveness on a job.
Labour: Work especially physical work with regard to wages or salary.
Conflict: The disagreement either directly or indirectly between twoo or
more parties in an organization.
8
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1 CONCEPTUAL FRAME WORK
Industrial relation cover all such relationship that a business enterprise
maintains with various section of the society such as workers, state,
customers and public who came into its contact. In the narrow sense, it refers
to all types of relationship between employers and employees trade union
and management works and unions and between workers and work. It also
includes all sorts of relationship both formal and informal levels in the
organization. Industrial and labour relations, therefore embrace national,
economic and industrial perspectives as well as the relations between the
single firm and employees.
According to Lewis (1997), admit that the term labour relations is a
broad one and is used in many ways. But in distinguishing it from personnel
relations and steward narrow it meaning down considerably. Labour
relations refers to direct dealing between management and individual
employee which the individual employee which the union does not directly
participate. On the other hand, the term human relations at work seems
undoubtedly more comprehensive and is perhaps mores satisfactory. But in
9
the context of developing economic effort of must people is concentrated on
agriculture within family limits. There work relations between cooperating
members of the economic unit but these are affected within traditional
norms.
According to Yasufu (1984), define industrial relations briefly as the
whole web of human interactions at wok which predicted upon and arises
employment contract. The scope of industrial and labour relations thus
embraces relations and interactions between the employers or managements
and employees either as individuals or as groups between the supervisor and
the workers and between the workers and his trade union. The interactions
between one trade union and another union or federation of unions and
between the unions management and the state are equally of central
importance and all within the preview of industrial and labour relations.
In terms of specific content, therefore, industrial and labour relations
is concerned with about problems in all their ramifications for example.
Employment problems and employment security
Hours of work, shift, holidays etc
Remuneration level, frequency, methods of wages payments and wages
fixing.
10
Labour and employers grievance and disputes
Labour of production and efficiency
Safety, health and welfare at work
Society: sickness and old age benefit, maternity, leave compensation, etc.
Naturally and labour relations present an infinite permutation of attitudes
on these matters. If is hard to achieve a consensus on the formulation of the
probability which have to be faced. Agreement about how to resolve them
thus often seems beyond reach.
The main purpose of study industrial and labour relations are to analyze
an promote greater understanding of the complexities of the human element
in the productive process and to formulate principles which would assist in
finding ways and means of isolating and solving the problems associated
there with and to effectively, harness the human effort toward optimum
productive output. Good and effective industrial and labour relation would
therefore be held to exist in an enterprise, industry and country, to extent that
there is the great possible understanding of those problems.
Adding another dimension to the shere of industrial and labour relation.
Walker (1972) sec industrial and labour relations as being to do with
accommodation between the various interest that are involved in the process
11
of getting work done. Implicit in this definition are some features. First the
assumptions is made that management and other employees are the only
parties involves, neither does it imply that employees are by trade unions.
It is perhaps in appreciation of this Harding (1987) has asserted that
effective industrial relations depends on the quality of training given to all
levels of personnel involved. This will include training would entail access
to sufficient background information in industrial and labour relations in
general as well as on their own organization. In addition to knowledge of
rules and function of communication strategies; pay structures and procedure
for negotiation and bargaining.
2.2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This chapter will examine the theories associated with industrial
relations in an organization. In this chapter, the researcher shall briefly
discuss the model of research of design, population of the study, Sample of
the study and the methods of data collection and data analysis.
Some of the theories associated with industrial and habour relations
management.
12
The pluralist theory:
According to Stigler and Friendland, this theory looks at society from
all different angle like political, social economic and cultural background of
people. The dispersion of power exhibiting various distinctions in
negotiation as in collective bargaining. It is the representation by union of
wages earners of labour. This theory looks at a society that encourages
sectionalism, Bquabbling and conflict which will in turn bring about a state
of violent for a pluralist Society to be stable there must be some mechanism
at work which help the competing groups together and hold them back from
rendering to place the pluralist argument therefore is a more effective role
for union to be part of decision making process and in the management of an
organization.
The marxist theory:
The Marxist theory insist that in capitalist societies the state is always
on the side of the employer in an attempt to protect the interest of middle
class. According to them the emphasis is therefore space on the need to fight
for democratic, political institutions and these political democracy. Marxist
argued the focus of industrial relations is for how conflict is contained and
controlled rather than on the process through which disagreement and
13
dispute are generated to them. Industrial relations is the study of processes of
control over relations.
The system theory:
The system theory is one of the theories of industrial relations, the
first major attempt in bringing industrial relation into a theoretical
framework was the seminal work of Dunlop on industrial relations system
and this was largely based on institution as framework with a strong
emphasis to interpret and gain understanding to the widest possible range of
industrial relations facts and practices. Dunlop was able to see industrial
relations as a thing between three principles actors. First the workers and
their organization, secondly, manager and their organizations and thirdly,
governmental agencies concerned with work place and work community.
Dunlop also state the apart from the actors, the system also comprise
of ideology which builds the industrial relations system together and a body
of rules created to govern the actors at work place and work community.
2.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
a) It established industrial democracy. Industrial relation means setting
employees problems though collective bargaining, mutual cooperation an
mutual agreement amongst the parties i.e management and employers
14
unions. This help in establishing industrial democracy in the organization
which motivates them to contribute their best to the growth and
prosperity of the organization.
b) It contributes to economic growth and development: Good industrial
relations lead to increased efficiency and hence higher productivity and
income. This will result in economic development of the economy.
c) It ensures optimum use of care resources: Good and harmonious
industrial relations create sense of belongingness and group cohesiveness
among workers, and also a congenial environment resulting in less
industrial unrest, grievances and disputes. This will ensure optimum use
of resources human and material eliminating all types of wastage.
d) It discourages unfair practices on the part of both management and
unions. Industrial relations involves setting up machinery to solve
problems confronted by management and employees through mutual
agreement to which both these parties and bound.
e) It improves morale of the work force: Good industrial relations, built
mutual cooperation and common agreed approach motivation one to
contribute one’s best result in higher productivity and hence incomes
give more job satisfaction and help improve the morale of the workers.
15
f) It prompts enactment of sound labour legislation. Industrial relations
necessitate passing of certain labour laws to protect and prompt the
welfare of labour and safeguard interest of all the parties against unfair
means or practice.
2.4 CAUSES OF POOR INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Perhaps the main or sources of poor industrial relation resulting in
efficiency and labour. Unrest, mental laziness on the part of both
management is not sufficiently concerned to ascertain the cause of
efficiently and unrest following the Laissez fair policy. Until it is faced with
strikers and more serious unrest even with regard to methods of work
management does not bother to advise the best method but leave it mainly to
the subordinates to work it out for themselves. However, the following are
briefly for cause of poor industrial relations.
a. Mental inertice on the part of management and labour.
b. An intolerant attitude of contempt towards the workers in the art of
management.
c. Inadequate fixation of wages structure.
d. Unhealthy working conditions
e. Indiscipline
16
f. Desire on the part of the workers for higher bonus or the corresponding
desire of the employers to give as little as possible.
g. Retrenchment, dismissals and lock-outs on the part of management and
strikers on the part of workers.
h. Lack of human relations skill on the part of supervision and others
managers.
General economic and political environment, such as rising prices, strikes
by others and general indiscipline having their effect on the employee’s
attitudes.
2.5 MEASURES OF IMPROVING INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
STRONG AND STABLE UNION.
A strong and stable union in each industrial enterprise is essential for
good industrial relations. The employers can easily ignore a weak union on
the plea that it hardly represent the workers. The agreement with such a
union will hardly be honored by a large section of workforce. Therefore,
there must be a strong and stable union in every enterprise to represent the
majority of workers and negative with the management about the terms and
conditions of services.
17
MUTUAL TRUST:
Both management and labour should help in the development of an
atmosphere at mutual cooperation, confidence and respect. Management
should adopt a progressive outlook and should recognize the right workers,
similarity, labour unions should persuade their members to work for the
common objective of the organization. Both the management and the union
should have part in collective bargaining and other peaceful methods setting
disputes.
WORKERS PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT:
The participation of workers in the management of the industrial unit
should be encouraged by making effective use of workers committees, joint
consultation and other methods. This will improve communication between
managers and workers, increase productivity and lead to greater
effectiveness.
MUTUAL ACCOMODATION:
The employers must recognize the right of collective bargaining of
the trade unions. In any organization there must be a greater emphasis on
mutual accommodation rather than conflict or unemployment attitude. The
approach must be of mutual give and take rather than take or leave the
18
management should be waiting to cooperate rather than blackmail workers
etc.
2.6 TYPES OF INDUSTRIAL UNREST
Typically, there are different types of industrial unrest in an
organization. However, some organizations are prone to industrial unrest
that others. The nature of business and the literacy level of employees goes a
long way to determining the number of occurrence of industrial unrest in a
particular organization.
Industrial unrest in an organization takes different forms. It could be
in the form of conflict between employees and management over conditions
or service, differences in wages between staff of the same level and step in
an organization, poor welfare service, poor communication networks,
defective rewards and sanctions modernism etc. it not properly and timely
handled, it could lead to industrial unrest which may eventually result to
break down of industrial relations (strike).
Oyibo (1993), defined strike as the cessation of work by a body of
persons employed acting in combination or refusal by any member of
persons employed to continue to work for any employer as a result of a trade
dispute, done as a means of compelling their employer to accept or not to
19
accept terms of employment and physical conditions of work. Industrial and
labour relation, here are different types of strike in organization. They
include:
WORK RULE:
Work to rule simply means to work according to legally stipulated
time frame. It prohibits the working of extra time in the form of over time.
By this, employees are expected to adhere strictly to lay down procedures,
manning levels, demarcation lines and job descriptions. Labour law
stipulates for example, the normal working hours of eight hours daily. By
implication. No employee can be made to work any time outside the
stipulated hours.
WILDCAT STRIKE:
Picketing occurs in a situation in which union members undertake to
deter, by persuasion and information, other employees from entering the
workplace so as not to weaken the impact strike action in motion. The of the
strike action in motion. The underlying tone is to persuade other worker to
stop work, to publicize the existence delivery of goods and services to the
organization, so as to systematically blackmail and awake management to
20
the need for collective bargaining and resolution of the root cause of the
issue in controversy.
SECONDARY ACTION:
Secondary action as a variant type of strike occur when deliberate
attempt are made by the aggrieved employees of a particular organization to
persuade the employees of another organization, not involve in any way in
the dispute, to break their contract employment with their employer. It is
characteristically akin to sympathy strike in certain circumstances. In order
to ensure that their action hit their management severely decided to cross-
picket lines. The primary objectives of secondary action is to disrupt the
supply of goods and service. The legitimacy of secondary action lies in the
fact that majority of the employees of the organization in dispute must
support the action for it to achieve a purpose.
RECOGNITION STRIKE:RECOGNITION STRIKE:
The beginning, industrial and labour relations between management
and employees union was beset with myriad of problems, mainly that of
recognition. This as a result of garmented unions, so to say in one particular
organization.
21
SITDOWN STRIKE:
In sit-down strike, the employees are required to be in the work place
and preferably at their duty post. However, they are not to do any work nor
allow to work.
2.7 SOURCES OF INDUSTRIAL CONFLICT
In organization, there are various avenues through which conflict
erupts. However, the sources of industrial conflict in an organization,
irrespective of the nature are interrelated. The most common ones include:
Communication Conflict:
Communication conflict among employers an employees in
organization are very common. Communication conflict is the
misunderstanding that develops at the point in the communication process,
transmission of message and meaning from one person to another. This
could be misunderstood due to semarities, ambiguous an incomplete
information, use of technical language, discontinuous due to noise, use of
self-style abbreviations and illegal writing disseminating information.
22
Poor pay/remuneration:
Naturally individual goes to work in organization with the simple
belief that in such work performance. They would be adequately rewarded in
the form of commensurate salary to meet their needs. However, if they are
not motivated adequately in the form of increased salary, their performance
will decline.
Role Conflict:
Role conflicts is the simultaneous occurrence of two or more role
expectation such that compliance with one would compliance more difficult
with the other. In any organization with role conflict except there is a well
defined description of job, such conflict could degenerate form organization
sphere to individual and personality conflict.
Leadership style adopted:
The leadership style adopted by an organizational leaders is a
common generate of conflict in organization. An example is a leader who is
authoritarian while his subordinates expect participative or democratic
organizational environment.
Differences in wages between staff in the same organization:
23
This is a situation where employees who have the same qualification
or experience are paid different salaries, for example, in NNPC an employee
with OND engineering or accounting is place on grade level SS7, where his
counterpart with business administration or secretarial studies is place on
grade level JS1, this can degenerate to conflict between employees and
management.
Mismanagement:
This occur when the management of an organization fraudulently use
the resources of an organization to enrich them, so that employees are
deprived their salaries and other fringe benefit. This may generate conflict if
not well handled.
Differences in perspectives:
Individual or groups who hold different perception are more likely to
come into conflict. Differences in perceptions, precipitate, disagreement and
make joint decision making and cooperation difficult.
Neglect by management:
Often, management of organization has neglected their employees to
the satisfaction of their individual and selfish ends. There are cases of where
24
money meant for staff welfare being diverted to areas that are of little or no
benefit to the employees.
Organizational structure:
The hierarchical arrangement of offices determines to a reasonable
extent whether there would be conflicts or not consequentially. Is the
organizational structure with shorts or long span? Are the functions
interrelated and woven? Are there clear cut of activities? These are various
others issues go to display the degrees of freedom in the organizations with
short span of control are fraught with conflict because of the presence of
close supervision.
2.8 INDUSTRIAL AND LABOUR MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES.
Industrial and labour management techniques are varied. They
include;
a. Problems solving or confrontation approach: the parties confront each
other face regarding the area of conflict. They delineate the areas of
conflict and discuss them candidly in a given and take fashion, mutual
trust, respect and long –lasing agreement usually result from it.
b. Super-ordinate goals approach: Super- ordinate goals are those goals
which the conflicting parties desire and which they cannot achieve
25
without the cooperation of ll the parties involved. These goals must be
highly valued and commonly sought, but unattainable without the
cooperation of other party.
c. Avoidance and smoothing: These are transient conflict management. in
avoidance, one of the parties withdraw from the conflict and suppresses
the conflicting feeling. Smoothing is however, the process of playing
down differences that exist between the parties while emphasizing their
common interests.
d. Alteration of the human variable: this means changing the behavior of
one or more of the parties involved. This is akin to behavior
modification. This is difficult to attain but once attained it result in long
term and meaningful harmony.
e. Mediation and arbitration: these approaches are mostly employed in
industrial and labour management problems. The mediator is third party
who offers suggestions on ways to reconcile the difference.
f. Arbitration: An arbitration however determines settlement that both
parties must consider and accept his decision ha legal backing. It is
therefore different from mediation conflict management whose
acceptability is based on good will and comprises of parties involved.
26
g. Friendly persuasion: This is a common method of managing conflict in
organization. It employs a combination of gentle persuasion, subtle
induced influences and personal appeals.
There are various sources of conflict so also the techniques of resolving
them. Consequently, other methods or strategies or resolving conflict in
organization especially between management/union.
Win-win method
Win-close method
Lose-lose method
Railroading method
h. Collective bargaining :
Involves the process of union organization ofn employees, negotiation
and administration and interpretation of collective agreement concerning
wages, hours of work and other condition of employment and dispute
settlement procedures. In the negotiation proper, the union present its
demands to the management team. Stating why the demands are being
made. The management through a supervision officer from the personnel
department holds a brief session with union leaders on the modalities from
the negotiations. The union leader opens the case giving reasons why
management should meet demands. The management team present it
27
counter arguments, marshaling out reasons why they think management
would not be able to meet union demands to the extent demanded. The next
stage concessions are made by both parties in order to reach a agreement.
Where agreement could not be reached on certain issue, such issue could be
adjoined to another meeting to enable each side consult with its main organ.
Negotiation breaks down when both sides are not prepare to yield groups to
the other. In such cases, meeting could be adjoined to cool tension an
provides opportunity for rethinking and consultations. The final stage is to
reduce all agreements into a memorandum of agreement which are signed by
representatives of both sides. The collective agreement is formally presented
to management for consideration and approval. Where an unimplemented
collective agreement is referred to the minister, he has the power by law to
appoint a conciliator or refer it to the industrial arbitration panel or the
alternative to the national industrial court for adjudication.
i. Trade disputes and settlement:
A trade disputes is any dispute between labour and management arising
out of the employment or non-employment of works. A trade dispute can be
declared by either labour or management because they can be lead to a lot of
industrial unrest and loss of production, hence government has always tried
to provide machinery for their settlement. The 1976 decree establishment
28
machinery for the parties of trade dispute which must be followed by all
perties to a dispute the step to be followed by all parties to dispute the step to
be taken in the settlement of a dispute as provide for by the decree are as
follows.
The parties concerned must first make effort to settle the dispute at a
meaning chaired by a mediator appointed by or with the agreement of
the parties involved.
Within 14 days such a melting has not resolved, the dispute, the matter
should be reported to the minister of labour who may then refer it to
conciliator.
The negotiator should then examine the reason for the dispute and
negotiate a settlement with the parties. An agreement is reached, then it is
binding on the parties concerned. Where there is an objection, the dispute
is referred to the national industrial court by the minister. This is the final
stage and so many award by the court is final and binding.
The problem with this procedure is that it may take long to settle a
dispute. Admittedly, it may take provision for settlement at each stage
but the dispute goes all the way to the national industrial court. It may
take more than three (3) months to settle.
29
2.9 HISTORY OF NPDC (NIGERIA PETROLEUM
DELVELOPMENT COMPANY)
The Nigeria Development company limited (NPDC) is a subsidiary of
the Nigeria National petroleum cooperation (NNPC) NNPC was set up in
1988 to engage in oil exploration and production. It vision is to be Nigerians
premier E & P company and its mission is to profitably operate a petroleum
exploration and production business both nationally and globally using
current technology.
NPDC has a board of directors, a managing director and fiver
executives directors in charge of the five divisions corporations, joint
ventures, services, finance and accounts and technical services. The
company’s operation is centered mainly in the Niger Delta and spans four
states in Nigeria. Viz Edo, Delta, Bayelsa and Rivers NNPC corporate and
operational headquarters are based in Benin City and has staff strength of
about size hundred and seventy two members.
The company produced its first oil in Okono/Okpobo in partnership
with Agip Energy and natural resources in December 2001, 10 months after
the commencement of operations. The first lifting was recorded on February
13, 2002. This marked the beginning of a truly indigenous E&P company
30
producing from an offshore environment, a terrain with enormous potential
for the Nigeria Oil industry. The company executing alliance with major Oil
company such as Agip, Shelli, Sinopec, NNPC, etc.
In seeking to attain its vision to become Nigeria’s premier E&P
company within the next few years,, NDPC intends to:
Pursue on accelerated exploration and production of underdeveloped
proven reserve in all blocks through agreed arrangement.
Commence aggressive exploration activities in deep offshore blocks in
competitive bidding or assigned to it.
Achieve rapid development and monetization of gas resources.
NPDC plans to rapid grows its business by optimally exploiting its
present portfolios of assets in Nigeria that have high prospectively and
venture into the international E&P business starting with Equatorial
Guinea. In fact NNPC acquired two blocks in Equatorial Guinea in 2006
and has also bided for third block in 2007.
31
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLY
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
This is a descriptive survey research in which industrial and labour
management in public organization is the primary focus. The researcher
utilized this design for the purpose of collecting valid reliable and adequate
data. The study was based on analytical research method.
3.2 SOURCES OF DATA COLLECTION
The sources of data used in this study consists of primary and
secondary sources.
Primary Sources: his is where data are collected from original source of
information or acquired raw and for the purpose of the study at hand,
questionnaire will be used to obtain the primary data.
Secondary Sources: this is where data are usually extended from published
works such as magazines, textbooks, journal, newspapers, periodical,
internet, etc.
32
3.3 INSTRUMENT OF DATA COLLECTION
The researcher, employee, primary data are questionnaire and
personal interview, while that of the secondary data consist of the related
subject. The questionnaires are divided into section A and B respectively.
Section A consist of the respondents personal data the information under this
section is directly related to the qualification. While section B consist of
relevant question. The questionnaires are design in the likely format.
3.4 POPULATION OF THE STUDY
The Nigerian petroleum development company limited has a
administrative headquarters in Benin City and other operational department.
Consequently, the research population for the study consist of the entire staff
members. This figure include both the senior, middle and junior staff
members in the headquarters and these in the different operations
departments as well as those in liaison office.
3.5 METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS
All the responses obtained from the various respondents were
organized into a table and simple percentage was adopted top analyzed
them.
33
Number .. .. of . .. .respondent×30
2
3.6 SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Sample size of 100 respondents were considered for the study. This
was drawn from both the senior, middle and junior staff members. The
convenience sampling techniques method was adopted in administering
questionnaire to the different categories of staff in the various department of
the company.
3.7 RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT
The reliability deals with how accurately a research instrument is
measuring, what it suppose to measure no matter the number of time such
measurement is taken. This differ with validity of an instrument in
measuring what it is suppose to measure. It also refers to data collection in
research project and how consistent the answer. As regard to the
questionnaire collected as a responses compared to quantities of it sent out
the researcher adopt test, re-test reliably.
A simple test item is used for this purpose, the same questionnaire is
administered at two weeks interval. The response from both question are
34
recorded and analyzed. The finding shows degree of validity and reliability
of the research instrument.
3.8 VALIDITY OF THE INSTRUMENT
Validity of the instrument is concerned with coverage scope and
adequacy of information obtained during the enquiring is the information
collection adequate for the purpose? The researcher uses predictive measure
of some of their instrument.
Based on the questionnaire sent out and the Reponses received could
be used on the quota of reposes received, the researcher could say that is
valid based on his findings.
35
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 ANALYSIS OF DATA
This chapter deal with analysis of data collection from the respondents
through the use of questionnaire. The data analysis is by simply percentage
and chi-square while questions in the questionnaire are presented in table
below. The analysis is based on the key questions relevant to the objectives
and research hypothesis.
A total of one hundred and fifty (150) questionnaire were distributed
but only hundred (100) were duly completed and returned in effect therefore,
this analysis is based on the hundred (100) questionnaire that was duly
completed and returned.
Table 1: Sex of respondents
Status No. of Respondent Percentage
Male 41 64
Female 23 36
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
36
The table above shows that 41 (64%) of the respondents are male
while the remaining 23 (36%) of the respondents are female.
Table 2: Marital Status of Respondent
Status No. of Respondent Percentage
Single 20 31
Married 39 61
Divorced 2 3
Widowed 3 5
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
As shown in Table 2 respondents out of the total 64 have senior school
certificate, thus form 3% of the total respondents of the total 64 also have
ND/NCE certificate and this forum 3% of the total repo dents that 48% of
the total respondents has one of the certificate. The table also recorded 41%
of those respondent with other certificates such as [Link]/[Link] 26
respondents out of the total 64 respondents.
37
Table 4: Length of service with the organization.
Durations in Years No. of Respondents Percentage
1-5 years 19 28
6-10 years 29 31
11-20 years 5 16
30 above 11 25
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
Out of the 64 copies of questionnaire processed, 19 respondents have served
their organization between 1-5 years. 29 respondents also serve between 6-
10 years with the organization. 5 respondents also put in between 11-20
years with the organization while 11 respondents put of the total 64
respondents have serve between 30 years and above with the organization.
38
Table 5: Training and manpower development impact positively on
workers productivity.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 42 66
Agree 20 31
Undecided 2 3
Strongly disagree - -
Disagree - -
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
Concerning the assertion that training and development impact positively on
workers productivity, 42 respondents strongly agreed representing 66% of
the respondents strongly agreed, 20 which account for 31% of the total
respondents agreed while 2 representing 3% of the total respondents are
undecided to that assertion.
Table6: There are significant relationship between training
development of workers.
39
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 11 17
Agree 50 78
Undecided 3 5
Strongly disagree - -
Disagree - -
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
the table revealed that 11 (17%) of the respondents highly agree. 50 (78%)
of the total respondents agreed there are significant relationship between
training and development of workers. While 3 respondents account 5% of
the total respondents are undecided to that ascertain.
Table 7: Motivation of workers brings about better performance of
worker in the organization.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 15 23
Agree 39 61
Undecided 10 16
Strongly disagree - -
Disagree - -
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
The table above shows that majority of 39 or 61% of the respondents
agree that motivation of workers brings about performance of workers in the
40
organization 15% or 23% strongly agreed while 10 or 16% of the total
respondents are undecided about the assertion.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 8 12
Agree 26 41
Undecided 11 17
Strongly disagree - -
Disagree 19 30
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
The result obtained from above shows how respondents asses how
often management organize training and development. 8 respondents making
up 12% strongly agree that management organize training and development
programmed often. 26 respondent making up 41% agree. 11 respondents and
undecided, while 19 respondents making up 30% of the total respondents
disagree to that assertion.
Table 9: On the job training off the training and simulation techniques
are forms of training and development recommended for employee by
the management.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
41
Strongly agree 8 12
Agree 4 6
Undecided 60 94
Strongly disagree - -
Disagree - -
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
From the analysis of the table it shows that 94% of the respondents agree
that on the job training programmed in the organization. While it
respondents which account 6% of the respondents strongly agree to that
assertion.
Table: 10 lack of training and development of employees result to low
productivity.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 13 20
Agree 44 69
Undecided 7 11
42
Strongly disagree - -
Disagree - -
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
The analysis of the above table show that 13 respondents which
accounts for 20% of the respondents strongly agree that lack of training and
development of employee results to low productivity. 44 respondents which
account 69% of the respondents agree to that assertion. While 7 respondents
which account 11% of the respondents are undecided on the subject matter.
Table 11: Training and manpower development contributes to workers
productivity.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 31 48
Agree 33 52
Undecided 2 3
Strongly disagree - -
43
Disagree - -
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
From the analysis of the above 63% of the respondents agree that
training and manpower development contributes to workers productivity
while 31 respondents representing 48% strongly agree to that assertion.
44
Table 12: Training and manpower development is a management tool of
improving workers productivity.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 14 28
Agree 42 66
Undecided 6 9
Strongly disagree - -
Disagree 2 3
Total 64 100
Source: Survey research, 2016
As presented in the table above; 14 respondents out of 64 given 22%
of the total respondents strongly agree that training and manpower
development is a managements representing 3% disagree to the assertion.
4.2 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
Although in the research circuit there were minimal recorded cases of
industrial and labour relation breakdown in the history of NPDC. However,
feeling of represent that could metamorphose to industrial and labour
relation breakdown were high. This feeling could easily be closed off with
the provision of efficient and effective network system of communication so
45
that there could be a transparent inter-breader rather than blurred visual
between management and other employees.
Employees felt disenchanted over the current human development and
training programme which rather than being seen as an integral part of
management function and responsibility to the employee sees as a peck and
favour that can only be earned by loyalty. There was an air of uncertainty
and inconsistency as to the actual direction of management on negotiation.
Especially whenever there is a change in management. The employees
are therefore of the option that while the employees and management could
change. The system of which negotiation is a part should be left intact, as
this is the only way they could guarantee industrial peace and harmony.
46
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY CONCLUSION AND RECOMMEDATION
5.1 SUMMARY
The research study is centered on industrial and labour relations
management in public sections using Nigeria Petroleum Development
Company Limited as a case study. In the course of the study. The researcher
formulates five hypothesis were individual tested base on the number of
reponses obtained and analyzed from administered questionnaire from the
target population in the final analysis, the obtained revealed that insufficient
disposal and administration of motivational facilities, ineffective
communication network system, detective appraisal machinery, subjective
platform for negotiation an inadequate training programme were identified
as some of the major causes of industrial and labour relations to achieve
goals and specifically the NPDC management must take into cognizance to
identified variable and map out strategies to counter effect in order to ensure
atmosphere of peace and harmony.
Admittedly, no individual that have grown out of singles can be
isolated from conflict. So also can no organization exist without one type
odf individual conflict or another, whenever conflict of any type occur
47
management interest and attention must be stimulated into finding ways of
amicably resolving it and timely to so as to avoid it degeneration to other
problem that could hamper the company from realizing its corporate goals
and objective.
5.2 CONCLUSION
From the analysis of the various data collected from the administered
questionnaire, it was ascertained factors are responsible for industrial and
labour management breakdown in an organization and by extension NPDC
in the process of the research, the five identified hypothesis were used to test
the research subject and it was found that the presence of all those factors if
not properly handled will not only result to crisis but a very serious negative
impact in the economy at large.
5.3 RECOMMENDATION
The researcher wishes to proffers pragmatic and radical solution to
this palpable satiation whenever that occurs. Consequently, it is
recommended that the management of the NPDC. In order to ensure optimal
atmosphere of peace and harmony that will engender unhindered economic
activities upon application recommends that.
48
1. Adequate wages and salary commensurate with employees skills and
responsibilities and comparable in an dimension with other oil and gas
companies of equivalent standing within the area been paid to them.
2. The reward and sections machinery in place must be devoiced of every
element of nepotism, ethincism and favoritism. Hard work should be
rewarded.
3. In order to avoid suspicious and to erase blackouts, management must
evolve a democratic style of management rather than autocratic style,
were labour and management could discuss, harmonies and have
consensus on typical issues.
4. Management should provide conducive working environment internal
and external, job security, recognition, job with adequate delineated
functions.
5. The need to acquaint employee with modern practice to enhance their
productivity led to the evolution of human development and training in
organizations.
5.4 SUGGESTION FOR FUTHER STUDY
There is no doubt that this study has a limited scope given the already
highlighted constraints. However, it has focused on aspect and produced
result but gap still exist in the study labour relations to other techniques of
49
industrial and labour management, so further research in this area is
suggested.
50
REFERENCES
Anugwon (2002): Industrial system in Nigeria issue, theories and practices
Enugu: Computer Edge Publisher
Amstrong M. (2009): Handbook of human resources management practice,
London: Kogo page.
Eruteya and Omogbiya O. (2013): Essential of human capital management
Benin: Justice Jeco Printing and Publishing Global.
Fashoyin T. (2008): Industrial relation in Nigeria development and practice
Lagos: Longman.
Fajana N. (2005): Strike strategy and tactics of Nigeria trade unions. Journal
of trade union. N. 3 Vol. 2 Pg. 43.
Nwachukwu B. M. (2000): Research method in education social and
management science Enugu Publishers.
Okpaho-Uyeh and Osio E. (2011): Principles of management Benin: Justice
Jeco Printing and Publishing Global.
Osio J. E. (2011): Industrial Relation: Theories and practice published in
Nigeria by Justice Jeco Printing and Publishing Global.
Paula B. (2001): Industrial relation and collective bargaining. Human
resource
management Vol. II
Salamon, M. (2000): Industrial relation theory and practice London:
Practice
Hal.
VenkataRatnan, (2008): Industrial relation London: Published by Oxford
University Press.
51
APPENDIX
Department of Business Administration
And Management,
School of Business Studies
Delta State Polytechnic,
P.M.B 5, Ozoro.
Dear Respondent,
I am a final year National Diploma (ND) student of the above department
and school researching on topic “industrial and labour relations management
in the public sector” (A case study of Nigeria petroleum development
company limited, Benin city)..
So I humbly solicit your co-operation for completing the questionnaire
designed to obtained basic information necessary for the successful
competence of my project.
I wish to ensure you that information will be used on the academic work
alone and shall be treated in strict confidence.
Thank for your co-operation
Yours faithfully,
____________________
AKIN ARMSTRONG
(Researcher)
52
QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Instruction: Please tick (√) to indicate answer to the appropriate box
1) Sex: Male ( ) Female ( )
2) Age: 21 – 25yrs ( ) 26 – 30yrs ( ) 31 – 35yrs ( ) 36 – 40yrs ( )
41yrs and above ( )
3) Marital status: Single ( ) Married ( ) Divorced ( ) Widow ( )
4) Education level: SSCE/GCE ( ) NCE/ND ( ) HND/BSC ( )
MSC/PHD ( )
5) Do you have any union in the organization? Yes ( ) No ( )
6) If yes, what is the relationship between the union leaders?
Very cordial ( ) Cordial ( ) Indifferent ( ) Strained ( ) Very
Strained ( )
7) Is this relationship between management and union member cordial?
Yes ( ) No ( )
8) If yes, what formed the cordiality?
9) If no, what could be done to improve the cordiality?
10) Have you had any industrial disputes in the organization?
Yes ( ) No ( )
11) If yes, how was it settled? (a) By involving the union leaders
(b) By involving external bodies (c) By attending cause of the dispute
without consulting the union leader (d) By threatening the labour
force of the organization (e) Any other, please specify
12) How best do you think industrial dispute could be settled within any
organization?
53
13) Could it had been possible to avoid any of the previous industrial
disputes (if any previously)? Yes ( ) No ( )
14) What could have be done to reduce/avoid industrial conflict in an
organization? (a) Free flow of information on time
(b) Making payment to employees as at when due (c) Carrying labour
union long when technical and sensitive decisions are to be taken
concerning employees (d) Giving promotion as when due. Other
(please specific)
15) Do labour leaders have roles to play in the settlement of industrial
disputes? Yes ( ) No ( )
16) If yes, mention the role of labour leader in the settlement of industrial
dispute.
17) Does management have important roles to play in the settling of
industrial disputes?
54