0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Understanding Primary Historical Sources

This document outlines a course module focused on the analysis of primary sources in Philippine history, highlighting the importance of understanding historical methods and the distinction between primary and secondary sources. It emphasizes the need for a people’s history perspective, as articulated by historians Renato Constantino and Fr. John N. Schumacher, to correct misconceptions and misrepresentations in historical narratives. The module encourages critical engagement with historical documents to foster a deeper understanding of the context and significance of past events.

Uploaded by

Sea Shell
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Understanding Primary Historical Sources

This document outlines a course module focused on the analysis of primary sources in Philippine history, highlighting the importance of understanding historical methods and the distinction between primary and secondary sources. It emphasizes the need for a people’s history perspective, as articulated by historians Renato Constantino and Fr. John N. Schumacher, to correct misconceptions and misrepresentations in historical narratives. The module encourages critical engagement with historical documents to foster a deeper understanding of the context and significance of past events.

Uploaded by

Sea Shell
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

COURSE LEARNING PACKETS TEMPLATE Document Code FM-STL-014

Saint Louis University Revision No. 01


School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity August 15, 2022
Page 1 of 3

MODULE 1: Analysis of Primary Sources

The picture to the left is an artifact popularly known as the


Laguna Copperplate Inscription. It was dated 900 CE (as
inscribed) and is the earliest known written document in
Philippine History. Decoded by Dutch anthropologist
Antoon Postma in 1992, the inscription written in Kawi
script tells of a cancellation of debt.

As a side note, the picture on the cover of this module is


the Golden Tara or the Agusan image found in 1917at
Agusan del Sur. It is a 21 karat gold statuette dating
between the 9th and 10th centuries. It is currently housed
in the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago.

Unit 1: Historical Method: Typologies and Repositories of Primary and Secondary


Sources; Internal and External Criticism

At the end of this unit, the students must be able to:


Define the meaning and relevance of history and differentiate between primary and
secondary sources; written and unwritten sources; external and internal analysis.

Engage

Complete the following sentences:

1. History is ___________________________________________________________________________

2. Studying History is important because _______________________________________________

3. Historical sources come from _______________________________________________________

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited. 1
COURSE LEARNING PACKETS TEMPLATE Document Code FM-STL-014
Saint Louis University Revision No. 01
School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity August 15, 2022
Page 2 of 3

Explore

The following are examples of historical sources. Try to identify whether they are primary
or secondary sources. Put a check mark on the corresponding column.

Source Primary Secondary

1. Relics

2. Autobiography

3. Biography

4. Book review

5. Diary

6. Encyclopedia

7. History Book

8. Journal Article

9. Oral history

10. Recording

Explain
History simply put is the study of past events. However, it can be stated that the relevance
of studying history goes beyond simple and is not confined within the said discipline, albeit,
its importance is viewed in the light of providing significant information as to how present-
day challenges in various areas of human experience may be addressed. For instance,
study of history in the context of medicine aids in providing information about trends in
diseases, illnesses, and their treatments; what went wrong and what worked. History has
also aided engineering and architecture with information on the progress of building
structures given a specific natural and social context. The list for outlining the practical uses
of history in other domains goes on and so we delve on a different kind of purpose, that of
studying history for nation building.

Historians Renato Constantino and Fr. John N. Schumacher, SJ each have articulated a
need for rewriting history, particularly a people’s history. Renato Constantino wrote his
book with the objective of writing a history that comes from the point of view of the Filipinos,
especially the grassroots. The essay of John Schumacher on the other hand, examines that
contention of Renato Constantino. Schumacher agreed on the point of writing a people’s
history but for him, he believes that other lenses or frameworks be used in studying history.

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited. 2
COURSE LEARNING PACKETS TEMPLATE Document Code FM-STL-014
Saint Louis University Revision No. 01
School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity August 15, 2022
Page 3 of 3

Indeed, the major lapse of our nation’s history is the heavy influence of American colonial
historiography and the Hispanocentric stance of historical resources. These produced a
Philippine History that focused on the Spanish Rule, the Revolutionary period, and the
American colonial era. In this area even, there were misrepresentations as according to
Schumacher as the responses coming from different provinces were not represented.
There is also a heavy historical discourse on the deeds of our recognized heroes but
Constantino takes a precarious stance toward this arguing that the so-called historical
deeds lacked critical evaluation.

And so, the task at hand is to revisit our history with the objective of clarifying
misconceptions, correcting misrepresentations, focusing on the collective struggles of the
people and showing the Filipino as also the primary agents of history.

To enrich the learning of history at present, a different approach is presented, one that
engages the learner with history itself to be able to examine the sources of history with
critical eyes and be able to connect an event and to its context.

Elaborate
This course as aforementioned provides a learning experience of history where you
the learners are faced with the historical documents with which you can make objective
analyses and interpretations that are context appropriate. But to reiterate, the kind of
historical sources that will be studied are primary ones.

Simply put, historical sources may be classified as either primary or secondary.


Primary sources are first hand or direct evidences to an event. These sources were made
specifically during the time period being examined. They can be eyewitness accounts,
records, photographs, original documents to name a few. Secondary sources on the other
hand are already interpretations of the primary source. Examples include journal articles,
textbooks, and the like.

Historical sources may also be written and unwritten. Written sources include literary
works, diplomatic or legal documents, and social documents. Unwritten sources pertain to
artifacts and oral testimonies. Now that you have an idea about these, let us test your
understanding.

References:
Constantino, R. (1974), A Past Revisited (Pre-Spanish-1941), pp. 3-11
Schumacher, J. N. (1996). The Making of a Nation, Essays on Nineteenth-Century Filipino
Nationalism. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press pp.7-15

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited. 3

Common questions

Powered by AI

Rewriting history with different lenses can provide a multidimensional perspective, allowing overlooked stories and voices to emerge, thus enriching historical narratives. However, it may also lead to potential biases if interpretations favor certain lenses over others without sufficient critical analysis. Schumacher supports the need for diverse frameworks but warns against oversimplification .

Incorporating both literary works and oral testimonies allows for a more comprehensive understanding of history as literary works (written sources) provide documented evidence, while oral testimonies (unwritten sources) offer first-hand cultural, social insights, and personal experiences that may not be captured in written form. This dual approach enriches historical narratives and bridges gaps between recorded events and lived experiences .

Using a Hispanocentric lens in Philippine historiography limits the perspective to primarily Spanish rule and colonization effects, which can result in misrepresentations and a lack of representation of the broader experiences and responses of different provinces. It emphasizes colonial narratives over indigenous and grassroots perspectives, which scholars like Renato Constantino argue should be corrected by focusing on the collective struggles and roles of Filipinos in history .

'People's history,' as advocated by Renato Constantino, prioritizes the experiences and perspectives of ordinary people and the grassroots rather than elite or colonial narratives. This approach seeks to highlight collective struggles and contributions of the populace, contrasting with traditional narratives that often emphasize colonial or prominent figures and events .

Historians like Renato Constantino play crucial roles in reshaping national historical narratives by challenging dominant colonial perspectives and advocating for histories that reflect the experiences and struggles of marginalized groups. Constantino's work pushes for a more inclusive, critically evaluated history that acknowledges the agency of ordinary people in historical progress and national identity formation .

Studying history informs present-day problem solving by providing context-based insights into past challenges and successes. In medicine, for example, it reveals treatment trends and medical successes or failures. In engineering, it informs about building techniques responsive to historical social and natural contexts, aiding current architectural innovations .

Primary sources are original materials or evidence from the time period being studied, such as eyewitness accounts, photographs, and original documents. They provide firsthand testimony or direct evidence. Secondary sources are interpretations and analyses based on primary sources, including journal articles and textbooks .

The decoding of the Laguna Copperplate Inscription by Antoon Postma in 1992 provided concrete evidence of early organized societies in the Philippines, with documented legal and economic systems as early as 900 CE. This inscription underlined the sophistication of precolonial Filipino culture and provided insights into social and political structures, prompting a reevaluation of historical timelines .

Critical engagement with historical sources in modern education enables learners to objectively analyze and interpret historical events within appropriate contexts, promoting a deeper understanding beyond surface facts. This method cultivates critical thinking skills, allowing students to critique narratives, understand historical processes, and draw informed conclusions from diverse perspectives .

Critical evaluation of historical sources requires both internal and external criticism. Internal criticism assesses the source’s content authenticity, coherence, and reliability, while external criticism examines the source’s origin, structure, and external validity, such as authorship and context. Both analyses ensure the source's credibility and relevance in historical research .

You might also like