0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views13 pages

Column Base Check in Multi-Storey Buildings

The document provides a detailed methodology for designing and checking column bases in multi-storey buildings, focusing on specific examples with different loading conditions. It includes calculations for normal forces, material specifications, and reliability conditions for both braced and unbraced columns. The document emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the column base can adequately support the loads applied, including dead, live, snow, and wind loads.

Uploaded by

oworodofatty
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views13 pages

Column Base Check in Multi-Storey Buildings

The document provides a detailed methodology for designing and checking column bases in multi-storey buildings, focusing on specific examples with different loading conditions. It includes calculations for normal forces, material specifications, and reliability conditions for both braced and unbraced columns. The document emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the column base can adequately support the loads applied, including dead, live, snow, and wind loads.

Uploaded by

oworodofatty
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HOW TO CHECK COLUMN BASE IN MULTI STOREY

BUILDING?
… worked examples for CO001
Design and check column base in multi storey building. Column base behave as pinned in both directions.
Column section is HEB 200 made of steel S235, concrete foundations are made from C25/30. Between base
plate 20 mm thick and pad footing grout is realized with 50 mm thickness.

BUILDING DIMENSIONS
L=6m span a
B=6m span b
nL = 8 number of spans in a direction
nB = 6 number of spans in b direction
Ltot = 48 m building length

Btot = 36 m building width


H = 3,6 m level high
nH = 5 number of floors
Htot = 18 building high

LOADS
gk = 3,0 kN/m2 dead load (ceiling + secondary beam + primary beam + floor)

acting on 5 floors
qs,k = 0,8 kN/m2 snow load

acting on 1 floor = roof

ql,k = 2,5 kN/m2 live load (not closely specified)

acting on 4 floors

qw,k = 0,6 kN/m2 wind load on walls

acting on 2 walls
floors
EXAMPLE 1 – middle column out of bracing system
Calculate normal force at column base and check designed geometry and materials. Column is subjected to
the self-weight, dead load, snow load and live load with loading area defined in figure. Calculated column is
not part of bracing system – there are not additional forces due to bracing system. In column base there are
compressive normal forces only, this forces are transmitted to foundations by contact between base plate and
concrete. Anchor bolts are not loaded and they don’t need to be checked.

Normal force in column base


Load area

A load  B  H  6  6  36 m
2

Column self-weight
6
N self  A column  g steel  H  7810 . 10  78 , 5  18  11 , 0 kN

Dead load

N dead  A load  g k  n floor  36  3 , 0  4  432 , 0 kN

Live load

N live  A load  g l, k  n floor  36  2 , 5  4  360 , 0 kN

Snow load

N snow  A load  g s, k  36  0 , 8  28 , 8 kN

Total load using combination rule 6.10

N Ed   G
  N self  N dead    Q   N live  N snow   0, snow
  1, 35  11  432   1, 5   360  28 , 8  0 , 5   1160 kN
Column base geometry

anchor bolt column


base plate
grout
pad footing

t = 20 mm base plate thickness


b1 = 300 mm base plate width
d1 = 300 mm base plate width
b = 1000 mm pad footing width

d = 1000 mm pad footing width


h = 800 mm pad footing depth

Column base material


Base plate material: structural steel S235
fy = 235 MPa yield strength
E = 210 GPa Young's modulus

γM0 = 1,0 partial safety factor for structural steel

Pad footing material: concrete C25/30


fc,k = 25 MPa compression strength

γc = 1,5 partial safety factor for concrete


Grout: not specified
Column base check
Strength in concentrated pressure is calculated using transmitting truncated cone according figure below.
Load transmitting layer made of grout is neglected in calculations.

 b1  2 b r   300  2  350  1000 


     
b2  min  3 b1    3  300    900   900 mm
   300  800  1100 
 b1  h     
d1  2d r   300  2  350  1000 
     
d2  min  3 d 1    3  300    900   900 mm
   300  800  1100 
d1  h     
Stress concentration factor

b2  d 2 900  900
kj    3,0
b1  d 1 300  300

Joint coefficient (introducing grout quality and thickness)

j  2 3 on the safe side (if fmd ≥ 0,2 fcd and if t ≤ 0,2·min{b1; d1}

Design value of concrete concentrated pressure strength

 j  k j  f c, k 2 3  3 , 0  25
f j, d    33 , 3 MPa
 c
1, 5

Effective length of cantilever

fy 235
c  t  20   30 , 7 mm
3  f j, d   M0
3  33 , 3  1 , 0
Effective area of the base plate under HEB section with uniformly distributed stress

effective area = area of H-shape


=> column section with c offset
on all sides

holes for anchor bolts

A eff  47 529 mm
2

Resistance of base plate

N Rd  A eff  f jd  47 529  33 , 3  1584 . 10 N  1584


3
kN

Reliability condition

N 1160
Ed
  0 , 73  1, 0 => condition is satisfied
N Rd
1584
EXAMPLE 2 – middle column is a member of bracing system
Calculate normal force at column base and check designed geometry and materials. Column is subjected to
the self-weight, dead load, snow load and live load with loading area defined in figure. Calculated column is
part of bracing system – there are additional compressive forces due to acting in bracing system. In column
base there are compressive normal forces only, this forces are transmitted to foundations by contact between
base plate and concrete. Anchor bolts are not loaded and they don’t need to be checked.

a) Maximum normal force in column base


Load area

A load  B  H  6  6  36 m
2

Column self-weight
6
N self  A column  g steel  H  7810 . 10  78 , 5  18  11 , 0 kN

Dead load

N dead  A load  g k  n floor  36  3 , 0  4  432 , 0 kN

Live load

N live  A load  g l, k  n floor  36  2 , 5  4  360 , 0 kN

Snow load

N snow  A load  g s, k  36  0 , 8  28 , 8 kN

Bending moment caused by wind load on cantilever substituting truss bracing:


2 2
L tot H 48 18
 q w, k    0 ,6    2333
tot
M wind
kNm (simplified calculation is valid for two bracing at
2 2 2 2

the both walls)


Additional force resulting from truss bracing

M 2333
   389 kN
wind
N wind
(compress)
B 6

Nwind Nwind

VEd Mwind
VEd

Total load using combination rule 6.10

N Ed
  G
  N self  N dead    Q   N live  N snow   0, snow
 N wind
 0, wind


 1, 35  11  432   1, 5  360  28 , 8  0 , 5  389  0 , 6   1510 kN

Column base geometry


Same as in example 1.

Column base material


Same as in example 1.

Column base check


Resistance is same as in example 1
Reliability condition

N 1510
  0 , 95 
Ed
1, 0 => condition is satisfied
N Rd
1584

b) Horizontal force in column base


L tot H 48 18
V Ed   Q
 q w, k   tot
 1, 5  0 , 6    194 kN (simplified calculation is valid for two bracing at
2 2 2 2

the both walls and both tensional and compressed bracing diagonals are active; in the case where only
tensional diagonal is active – compressed diagonal is out of function – horizontal reaction is whole at one
base plate)
Alternative 1: horizontal force transmitted by friction between base plate and concrete
The friction force Ff,Rd dependent on the normal compression force in column base. This force should be
calculated as minimum force Nc,Ed,min from combination of dead load (with partial coefficient 1,0) and wind
load.

N c, Ed, min
  G
 N self
 N dead
 Q N wind
 1 , 0  11  432   1, 5  389  1026 kN

F f, Rd  C f, d  N c, Ed, min
 0 , 2  1026  205 kN

Reliability condition

V Ed 194
  0 , 95  1, 0 => condition is satisfied
V Rd 205

Alternative 2: horizontal force transmitted by shear of anchor bolts


This calculation may be used only for standard diameters of bolt holes!
Shear resistance of one bolt made of rod with diameter 20 mm, steel S355:

 F1, vb, Rd   40 , 82 
F vb, Rd  min    min    32 , 03 kN
 F 2, vb, Rd   32 , 03 

where

 v  f ub  A s 0 , 5  490  245
F1, vb, Rd  0 , 85   0 , 85   40 , 82 kN (coefficient 0,85 should be used for bolts
 M2
1, 25

made of rods)

 bc  f ub  A s 0 , 333  490  245


F 2, vb, Rd    32 , 03 kN
 M2
1 , 25

 bc  0 , 44  0 , 0003  f yb  0 , 44  0 , 0003  355  0 , 333

Resistance of two bolts in column base

V Rd  n b  F vb, Rd  2  32 , 03  64 kN

Reliability condition

V Ed 194
  3 , 03  1, 0 => condition is not satisfied
V Rd 64
Alternative 3: horizontal force transmitted by shear key (shear lug)
Shear key made of IPE, HEB or channel (sometimes CHS or SHS may be used) is welded to bottom face of
base plate. On the upper face of pad footing, empty space is omitted during concreting. After the column is
erected and fixed in vertical position, the empty space is infill by grout. Shear key ant it's welds need to be
checked on bending and shear. Horizontal stress should be compared with concrete strength.
EXAMPLE 3 – facade column as a member of bracing system
Calculate normal force at column base and check designed geometry and materials. Column is subjected to
the self-weight, dead load, snow load and live load with loading area defined in figure bellow. Calculated
column is part of bracing system – there are additional tensional forces due to acting in bracing system.

a) Maximum normal force in column base


Load area

A load  B  H  3  6  18 m
2

Column self-weight
6
N self  A column  g steel  H  7810 . 10  78 , 5  18  11 , 0 kN

Dead load

N dead
 A load  g k  n floor  18  3 , 0  4  216 , 0 kN

Live load

N live
 A load  g l, k  n floor  18  2 , 5  4  180 , 0 kN

Snow load

N snow
 A load  g s, k  18  0 , 8  14 , 4 kN

Bending moment on cantilever substituting truss bracing caused by wind load:


2 2
L tot H 48 18
M wind
 q w, k   tot
 0 ,6    2333 kNm (simplified calculation is valid for two bracing at
2 2 2 2

the both walls)


Additional force resulting from truss bracing

M 2333
   389 kN
wind
N wind
(tension force)
B 6

Nwind Nwind

Mwind
VEd VEd

Total load using combination rule 6.10

N Ed
  G
  N self  N dead    Q   N live  N snow   0, snow
 N wind
 0, wind

 1, 35  11  216   1, 5  180  14 , 4  0 , 5  389  0 , 6   971 kN

Column base geometry


Same as in example 1.

Column base material


Same as in example 1.

Column base check


Resistance is same as in example 1
Reliability condition

N 971
  0 , 61 
Ed
1, 0 => condition is satisfied
N Rd
1584

b) Minimum normal force in combination with horizontal force in column base


L tot H 48 18
V Ed   Q
 q w, k   tot
 1, 5  0 , 6    194 kN (simplified calculation is valid for two bracing at
2 2 2 2

the both walls and both tensional and compressed bracing diagonals are active; in the case where only
tensional diagonal is active – compressed diagonal is out of function – horizontal reaction is whole at one
base plate)
Total load using combination rule 6.10 (compressive forces are favourable, tensional force is unfavourable)

N Ed
  G, fovourable
  N self  N dead    Q, unfovourab le
N wind
 Q, fovourable
N live
 N snow   0, snow


 1, 0  11  216   1, 5   389  0 , 0  180  14 , 4  0 , 5    357 kN (tension force in column!)

In column base there is tensional normal force, this force is transmitted to foundations by anchor bolts. Base
plate is not loaded and it don’t need to be checked.

Alternative 1: horizontal force transmitted by friction between base plate and concrete
Couldn't be used because of compressive normal force absence!!!

Alternative 2: horizontal force transmitted by shear of anchor bolts


Same as in example 2.

Alternative 3: horizontal force transmitted by shear key (shear lug)


Same as in example 2.

Anchor bolts check


There are more ways how to anchor bolts may fail. Next conditions should be checked:

 Tension of bolts (according to the EN 1993-1-8)

 Adhesion failure between bolt and concrete (according to the CEN/TS 1992-4-1; ETAG 001)

 Pull out of one bolt from concrete block (according to the CEN/TS 1992-4-1; ETAG 001)

 Pull out of group of bolts from concrete block (according to the CEN/TS 1992-4-1; ETAG 001)

Equilibrium limit state


Pull out of whole pad footing from ground (according to the EN 1990)

You might also like