CQI-15 Welding System Assessment Guide
CQI-15 Welding System Assessment Guide
ABOUT AIAG
Purpose Statement
Founded in 1982, AIAG is a globally recognized organization where OEMs and suppliers unite to address and res
affecting the worldwide automotive supply chain. AIAG’s goals are to reduce cost and complexity through collab
improve product quality, health, safety and the environment; and optimize speed to market throughout the supp
AIAG Organization
AIAG is made up of a board of directors, an executive director, executives on loan from member companies, ass
directors, a full-time staff, and volunteers serving on project teams. Directors, department managers, and progr
managers plan, direct and coordinate the association’s activities
under the direction of the executive director.
AIAG Projects
Volunteer committees focus on business processes or supporting technologies and methodologies. They conduc
and develop, publish, and provide training on standards, conventions, standard business practices, white papers
guidelines in the areas of automatic identification, CAD/CAM, EDI/electronic commerce, continuous quality impro
health focus, materials and project management, occupational health & safety, returnable containers and packa
systems, transportation/customs and truck & heavy equipment.
AIAG PUBLICATIONS
An AIAG publication reflects a consensus of those substantially concerned with its scope and provisions. An AIAG publication is
intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer and the general public. The existence of an AIAG publication does not in
any respect preclude anyone from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming
to the publication.
CAUTIONARY NOTICE
AIAG publications are subject to periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions.
MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE
Recognizing that this AIAG publication may not cover all circumstances, AIAG has established a maintenance procedure. Please refer
to the Maintenance Request Form at the back of this document to submit a request.
Published by: Automotive Industry Action Group
26200 Lahser Road, Suite 200
Southfield, Michigan 48033
Phone: (248) 358-3570 • Fax: (248) 358-3253
APPROVAL STATUS
The AIAG Quality Steering Committee and designated stakeholders approved this document for publication in March 2010.
-2-
FOREWORD
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) committees are made up of volunteers from member companies in the auto
industry. The work of preparing process audits is done by AIAG technical committees.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare Automotive Standards and System Requirements. Draft documents
the technical committees are circulated to the Steering Committee for review and consensus approval. Publication of th
requires approval by the Quality Steering Committee.
The Quality Steering Committee would like to acknowledge and thank the following individuals and their companies w
contributed time and effort to the development of this document.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Core Members:
Joseph Beckham Chrysler Group LLC Gilbert Chrostowski TRW Automotive Virender Choudhri
Corporation Thomas Lopiccolo General Motors Company Neal McMichael Ford Motor Company
Carl Occhialini The Lincoln Electric Company
Veronica Sebald Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing, North America Ryan Turnwald
America Manufacturing, Inc.
Dave Willig Nexteer Automotive
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT AIAG 1
FOREWORD 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
INTRODUCTION 5
General
Process Approach
Welding System Assessment Goals 5
Assessment Process
Assessor Qualifications 6
Other Requirements
1 SCOPE 7
1.1 General
1.2 Application
1.3 Reference
2 THE WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE 9
3 SPECIAL PROCESS: WELDING ASSESSMENT 10
APPENDIX A – PROCESS TABLES 31
GLOSSARY 49
-4-
INTRODUCTION
General
The work of preparing CQI-15: Special Process: Welding System Assessment (WSA) was carried out through the AIAG
Work Group. These welding requirements are complementary to customer and product standards.
The WSA can be used to assess an organization’s ability to meet the requirements in this assessment, as well as custom
regulatory, and the organization’s own requirements. The WSA can also be used between an organization and its suppl
In the WSA, the word “shall” indicates a requirement for purposes of the self assessment. Failure to meet the requirem
an assessment that is either “Not Satisfactory” or “Needs Immediate Action.” The word “should” indicates a recommen
Where the term “such as” is used, any suggestions given are for guidance only.
Process Approach
The WSA supports the automotive process approach as described in ISO/TS 16949.
Assessor Qualifications
Assessor(s) shall have the following specific experience to conduct the WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT:
1. Be an experienced quality management system (QMS) internal auditor (for example, latest edition of ISO/TS 16949
2. Assessor shall possess welding knowledge. Evidence shall include a minimum of 5 years experience in welding or a
of formal education in welding and welding experience totaling a minimum of 5 years
3. Assessor shall possess knowledge of and be familiar with the application of automotive quality core tools including
process control, measurement systems analysis, part approval, failure mode and effects analysis, and advanced quality
Note: If more than one assessor is required to meet the above qualifications, the lead
assessor shall be the person meeting the requirements in item #1.
Other Requirements
The organization shall keep records as evidence of compliance to the requirements identified in the WSA, as well as al
action plans to address any unsatisfactory ratings. These records shall be readily available for review by any customer
compliance to the requirements within this document.
-6-
1 SCOPE
1.1 General
This document specifies process requirements for an organization or its suppliers performing applicable welding, who
demonstrate ability to consistently provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements, an
enhance customer satisfaction through the effective application of the system, including processes for continual im
the system.
The Welding System Assessment is applicable to sites where customer-specified parts for production and/or service ar
throughout the automotive supply chain.
1.2 Application
All requirements of the WSA are generic and are intended to be applicable to all organizations performing the welding
addressed in this document, regardless of type, size, and product.
Note: Four Process Tables have been developed and the appropriate table(s) is to be referenced during the
assessment. The Process Tables are specific to welding processes as noted below:
-1-
m member companies in the automotive
-3-
1
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
7
7
7
8
9
10
31
49
-5-
STEM ASSESSMENT:
, latest edition of ISO/TS 16949, ISO 9001)
years experience in welding or a combination
-7-
Process Table C - Laser Welding
Nd YAG CO2 DIODE
Wire Fed
Process Table D - Solid State Welding
Inertia Friction Welding Direct Drive Friction Welding Friction Stir Welding
Flash Butt Welding Resistance Butt Welding Ultrasonic Welding
These Process Tables contain requirements for:
1. Management Responsibility & Quality Planning
2. Floor and Material Handling Responsibility
3. Equipment / Facilities/Controls
4. Tooling/Fixturing
5. Process Controls and Confirmation
6. Essential Variables
The Process Tables specify the tolerances of process parameters and the frequencies for checking process control param
parts. The Requirements and Guidance in the WSA form will notify the assessor when to refer to the Process Tables.
1.3 Reference
The following standards are used as reference material. There are other reference materials that contain more informati
the list is not meant to be inclusive. The applicability is limited to the subject matter referenced.
-8-
Standard Number Title
ANSI Z 49.1 Safety in Welding and Cutting
AWS A3.0 Standard Welding Terms and Definitions
2. Identify all welding processes to which CQI-15 Special Process: Welding System Assessment, applies (see
Record these processes on the WSA.
3. Complete the WSA, determining the level of compliance. A minimum of one job audit (Section 6) shall be
during each assessment.
4. Address each “Not Satisfactory” item and determine corrective action, including root cause analysis and im
of the corresponding corrective action(s). The corrective action(s) shall be completed within 90 days. Records of th
action, including verification, shall be maintained.
5. “Needs Immediate Action” requires immediate containment of suspect product. Address each “Needs Imm
item and determine corrective action(s), including root cause analysis and implementation of the corresponding cor
action(s). The corrective action(s) shall be completed within 90 days. Records of the corrective action, including ve
shall be maintained.
- 10 -
Instructions for completing the Cover Sheet
1. Facility Name: Name of the facility being assessed.
One form shall be used for each facility. The facility may have several buildings or physical locations in the same gen
there is a separate management team or different management system, then these locations shall be considered as separ
2. Address: The street address of the facility being assessed; P.O Box numbers may be given as additional inform
8. Date of Assessment: Enter the date(s) of the assessment. An alphanumeric format shall be used to avoid confu
different numeric formats.
Example: May 3 – 4, 2010
9. Date of Previous Assessment: List the date of the previous CQI-15 Special Process: Welding System Assessme
facility.
10. Type(s) of Welding Processing at this Facility: Place a checkmark to designate all welding process(es) perform
facility. This information determines the appropriate Process Table that shall be used during the assessment. Processe
the cover sheet are not part of the Welding System Assessment.
11. Current Quality Certification(s): The weld organization shall list their current quality certifications, e.g., ISO/T
9001. Certifications may be from 3rd party sources or customer quality certifications. If customer quality certification
the year of the last assessment by the customer shall also be given.
12. Date of Re-assessment (if necessary): If “Not Satisfactory” findings were observed from the original assessme
weld organization shall address each item and determine correct action, including root cause analysis and implementati
corresponding corrective action(s).
The date of the re-assessment shall be given here, and the appropriate Question(s) from Sections 1 – 5, in the o
assessment, shall be modified to reflect that the evidence, relating to the implementation of the corrective actio
observed. Also, the “Number of Not Satisfactory Findings” shall be modified as appropriate.
13. Personnel Contacted: List the name(s), title(s), phone number(s), and email address(es), if available, of the prin
participants from the weld organization.
14. Auditors/Assessors: List the name(s), Company(ies), phone number(s) and email address(es), if available, of th
auditor/assessor(s).
15. Number of “Not Satisfactory” Findings: Enter the number of “Not Satisfactory” findings observed during the a
16. Number of “Needs Immediate Action” Findings: Enter the number of “Needs Immediate Action” findings obse
the assessment.
17. Number of “Fail” Findings in the Job Audit(s): Enter the number of “Fail” findings observed from the job audi
- 12 -
Stir Welding
g
Standard’s Organization
ANSI - [Link]
[Link]
[Link]
SSMENT PROCEDURE
ng System Assessment, from AIAG.
shall list their current quality certifications, e.g., ISO/TS 16949, ISO
quality certifications. If customer quality certification is given, then
en.
- 11 -
ory” findings were observed from the original assessment, then the
t action, including root cause analysis and implementation of the
Facility Name:
Address:
Personnel Contacted:
Name Title Phone Email
Auditors/Assessors
Name Company Phone
- 13 -
Instructions for completing Sections 1 – 5
Sections 1 - 5 contain questions and the requirements and guidance for each question. The Sections are:
Section 1 – Management Responsibility & Quality Planning
Section 2 – Floor and Material Handling Responsibility
Section 3 – Equipment/Facilities/Control
Section 4 – Tooling/Fixturing
Section 5 – Process Controls and Confirmation
The assessor shall assess the weld organization compliance to Sections 1 – 5 by comparing the evidence presented by t
organization to the requirements listed in the “Requirements and Guidance” column.
- 14 -
NOTE 1: In the “Requirements and Guidance” column, the word “shall” indicates a requirement
and the term “such as” indicates that any suggestions given are for guidance only.
NOTE 2: The “Requirements and Guidance” column will indicate to the assessor when the Process
Tables are pertinent to the Questions. When the Process Tables are pertinent to the Question, the assessor
shall assess the weld organization compliance to the specified section(s) in the Process Tables.
NOTE 3: If the question is not applicable to the weld organization, then the assessor shall place a
checkmark in the “N/A” Assessment column. If the observed evidence is in compliance to the question,
the assessor shall note the evidence in the “Objective Evidence” column and place a check mark in the
“Satisfactory” column. If the observed evidence is not in compliance to the question, then the assessor
shall note the non-compliance in the “Objective Evidence” column and place a check mark in the “Not
Satisfactory” column.
NOTE 4: Where nonconforming product is identified in the assessment of a given question the
assessor shall place a check mark in the “Needs Immediate Action” (NIA) column. NIA requires
immediate containment of suspect product.
The Sections are:
Assessm
Question
Number Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
How do you maintain welder Required qualification maintenance. If the welder has not
certification? welded in the specific operation in a 6 month time frame, the
welder must be requalified to that operation. Based on the
1.4 welder's quality performance, it must be established when
retraining and requalification of the individual must be
performed.
Is set-up practice in compliance Set-up verification to the procedures (as example: equipment
with documented work settings, clamping sequence, weld sequence, direction of
1.5 instructions? travel and other process controls) in compliance to
documented work instructions.
nt
Assessment
Needs Immediate
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Action
anning
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Assessment
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Needs Immediate
Action
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Question
Number Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
Assessment
Needs Immediate
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Action
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Ass
Question Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
Number
Does the welding organization The analysis of products or processes over time can yield vital
monitor and analyze data over information for defect prevention efforts. The organization shall
time, and react to this data? have a system to collect, analyze, and react to product or
essential process data over time.
1.12 Methods of analysis shall include ongoing trend or historical
data analysis of product or process parameters. The
organization shall determine which parameters to include in
such analysis.
Is management reviewing the Management shall review the weld process control systems. The
weld control system at a management review shall include efforts to detect out-of-control
frequency determined by the conditions or alarm conditions. The process of reviewing the
1.13
control plan? control system shall be documented and recorded in the control
plan.
Are internal assessments being The organization shall conduct internal assessments on an
completed on an annual basis, at annual basis, at a minimum, using the AIAG WSA. Concerns shall
1.14 a minimum, using AIAG WSA? be addressed in a timely manner.
Does the Quality Department The quality management system shall include a process for
review, address, and document documenting, reviewing, and addressing customer concerns and
1.15 customer and internal concerns? any other concerns internal to the
organization. A disciplined problem-solving approach shall
be used.
nt
Assessment
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Needs Immediate
Action
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Question
Number Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
Is there a continual The welding organization shall define a process for continual
improvement plan applicable to improvement for their welding processes identified in the
each process defined in the scope of the WSA. The continual improvement process shall
scope of the assessment? be designed to bring about improvements in quality and
1.16 productivity. Identified actions shall be prioritized and shall
include timing (estimated completion dates). The organization
shall show evidence of program effectiveness.
Does the Quality Manager or The Quality Manager or designee is responsible for
designee authorize the authorizing and documenting the disposition of quarantined
1.17 disposition of material from material.
quarantine status?
Assessment
Needs Immediate
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Action
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Question
Number Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
Has the welding organization The welding organization shall develop and maintain a
developed a critical spare part critical spare parts list and shall ensure the availability of
1.20 list and are the parts available such parts to minimize production disruptions.
to minimize production
disruptions?
How does the organization Reaction plans are to be followed per the control plan and
document and respond to PFMEA or, in the case of newly indentified issues PFMEA and
1.21 quality spills, nonconformance, control plan must be updated to reflect the new failure mode
customer concerns? and reaction steps taken.
What is the process deviation If there are to be changes in process outside of the current
requirements of your customer? control plan and last agreed upon process and parts sign off,
do you know what your customer requirements are, have
1.22 you notified your customer, and do you have customer
approval prior to making the change?
Assessment
Needs Immediate
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Action
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Question
Number Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A Satisfactory
2.3 Is lot traceability and integrity Out-going lot(s) shall be traceable to the incoming lot(s). The
maintained throughout all discipline of precisely identifying lots and linking all pertinent
processes? information to them enhances the ability to do root cause
analysis and continual improvement.
2.6 Is part loading specified, Loading parameters shall be specified, documented, and
documented and controlled? controlled. Examples include part load sequence and clamp
sequence.
Is the handling, storage and The welder's loading system, in-process handling, and
packaging adequate to preserve shipping process shall be assessed for risk of part damage or
product quality? other quality concerns.
2.8
Other practices such as stacking of overloaded containers can
also increase the risk of part damage.
ity
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Question
Number Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
Are parts free from Parts shall be free from contaminants that are detrimental to
contaminants that would be the quality of the welding processes, subsequent processes,
detrimental to the quality of the or the product. If applicable, pre-wash and post-wash
2.10 welding processes, subsequent parameters shall be monitored and documented.
processes, or the
product?
3.2 Are the power supplies The power supply should be adequate for the manufacturing
sufficiently sized? process with consideration not limited to output energy, duty
cycle, cooling, flow rates and
grounding.
Are process equipment The calibration and certification of the process equipment
calibrations and/or verification shall be checked at regular specified intervals. Refer to the
3.3 certified, documented, available, applicable Process Tables.
and current?
3.4 Has a preventative maintenance Supplier shall have a preventative maintenance program that
program been established and is documented and implemented. Refer to Section
documented? 1.19 and the applicable Process Tables.
Have the necessary replacement The replacement parts and process consumables shall be
parts and process consumables identified, maintained in the appropriate volumes and proper
been identified and made readily storage. Consumables must be on the customer's approved
available? source list (if applicable). Refer to the applicable Process
Tables, Section 2.0 and Section 1.19. This shall be captured in
3.5 tools such as the set up procedure, PFMEA and Control Plans.
It should be included in the layered process audit or other
similar type quality review process.
Are the process, equipment, and The welding operation shall have a list of welding process,
safety alarm checks being equipment, and safety alarms. These alarms shall be
tested at the required frequency individually tested at the required frequency as listed in the
3.6 or after any repair or rebuild? control plan, and after any repair, process change or rebuild.
These checks shall be documented.
nt
Assessment
Needs Immediate
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Action
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Assess
Question Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
Number
Section 4 - TOOLING/FIXTURING
Is there a record of the design Supplier shall have documentation of the fixture design, that
and set-up of the fixture? are stored properly and accessible. Proper identification and
4.1 revision level on the fixture or related to the fixture.
Documented fixture set-up (i.e., clamps, pins,
locating devices)
4.2 Is the positioning of each part A method to detect proper fixture and part position is required
being controlled? for each part, such as the use of proximity switches, optical
sensors, mechanical probes, part
presence or poke yokes., etc.
Has fixturing/tooling preventative Supplier shall have a preventative maintenance program that
maintenance program been is documented and implemented. Refer to Section
4.3 established? 1.18 and the applicable Process Tables. Examples: cleaning,
degreasing, and fixturing integrity.
Are the fixture components Gas, air, sensors, control cables, etc. are adequately protected
4.4 robust? for the process environment.
4.5 Are the tooling components Fixturing/tooling was developed considering movement, reach,
designed for the welding accessibility, tool center point, maintenance, and ergonomics
process? (manual, automatic, and robotics)
Assessment
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Needs Immediate
Action
MATION
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
A
Question Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A
Number
Are process control parameters Process control parameters shall be monitored per frequencies
monitored at established established in the control plan. An appropriate person shall
frequencies? verify the process control parameters.
5.2
Management review is required per Question 1.13.
How does the organization review Are there documented reaction plans with appropriate levels of
and react to out of containment for both out of control and out of tolerance process
5.3 control/specification parameters? Is there documented evidence that reaction plans
parameters? are followed?
How does the organization handle There shall be a hierarchy established for making and approving
changes to process control process changes. Each process should be acted on according to
5.4 parameters after initial the level of change. Review process changes with your
customer approval? customer.
5.5 Are In-Process and Final Tests In-Process and Final Tests shall be performed per frequencies in
performed at established the control plan as agreed upon between the supplier and the
frequencies? customer.
5.6 Are weld quality requirements Weld quality requirements per internal and customer
clearly defined per customer specifications, such as but not limited to the following testing
specifications? methodology:
CQI-15
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
Instructions for completing the Job Audit
The organization is to complete a minimum of one welding part job audit during each assessment. This should be done
preferably on a part identified for one of the customers requiring compliance to this document. More part job audits m
done if time permits. Preferably, safety or critical parts should be audited. This may not be easily determined with faste
especially if the fastener manufacturer does not identify the end customer (auto manufacturer, tier one, etc.). It is
recommended that the job audit be performed at the end of the welding system assessment.
The job audit is not the only or main focus of the WSA. The other five sections on Management Responsibility and
Quality Planning, Floor and Material Handling Responsibility, and Equipment/Facilities/Control, Tooling/Fixturing, an
Process Controls and Confirmation are equally if not even more important. The job audit of one part, one weld process
not sufficient to use as a basis to complete the other sections of the complete WSA.
The job audit is a compliance type audit/review of a specific part and its related paperwork and processing, including
welding equipment and processing records for that job from the beginning receipt of a part through processing in the
welding operation and inspection to packaging. Parts shall be taken from the shipping area at the dock or the end of the
welding operation. If an automotive manufacturer’s part is not available or identifiable, then parts from other customer
requiring compliance with this document shall be used for the assessment.
The part checked shall represent a major weld operation such as an individual operation, cell, or assembly line. In
subsequent welding system assessments, different parts and welding processes shall be checked.
The specific welding processing parameters (applies to 6.1 and 6.13 in the Job Audit) that are required in the job audit
be added to the job audit form. This can be done by reviewing the customer specification(s), the Control Plan, the FME
and the floor work/job order. Each processing step shall be reviewed for proper production records/compliance/inspect
These steps can be compared to those in the Welding System Assessment for the actual job/welding process being revi
for compliance. The welding records for the actual time frame/shift etc. that the job was processed shall also be checke
The actual welding equipment and instrumentation certification shall be verified as being in compliance to the appropr
equipment requirements in the equipment section.
- 26 -
Version 1 Issued 3/10
nt
Assessment
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Needs Immediate
Action
essment. This should be done
ment. More part job audits may be
e easily determined with fasteners,
urer, tier one, etc.). It is
nt.
anagement Responsibility and
Control, Tooling/Fixturing, and
of one part, one weld process, is
6.4 Are weld faults audible, visible and does the line 5.1.3
shut down?
6.5 If the weld cycle is interrupted, is the part 2.7
controlled or contained until dispositioned by 5.1.4
appropriate personnel?
Are weld quality requirements clearly defined 1.9 Each part may have one or more requirements deter
6.20 per customer specifications? 5.6 Parts must meet each requirement. List requi
CQI-15
Special Process: Welding System Assessment
36
Welding, Flash Butt Welding, Resistance
- 31 -
PROCESS TABLE A- Arc Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is confo
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
1.0 1.7, 1.8 Arc welding specific essential variables which shall be addressed in
the FMEA, control plan and welding
procedures
x x x x
x x x x x
x x x x x
x x1 x1 x
x x x
x x x x x
x x
x x
x
x
x x x
x x x1 x1 x
x x x x
x x x
x x x x
x x x x
PROCESS TABLE A- Arc Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is confo
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
dit, the auditor shall verify welding is conforming to the customer's requirements.
x x
x3 x3
x x x
x x
Resistance Projection
Spot Welding Welding (PW)
Related WSA (RSW)
Item # Category/Process Steps
Question #
2.0 1.7, 1.8 Resistance welding specific essential variables which shall be
addressed in the FMEA, control plan and welding procedures
b audit, the auditor shall verify welding is conforming to the customer's requirements.
X X X
X X
X X
X X X X X
X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X X X X
PROCESS TABLE B- Resistance Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is confo
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
Resistance Projection
Spot Welding Welding (PW)
Related WSA (RSW)
Item # Category/Process Steps
Question #
audit, the auditor shall verify welding is conforming to the customer's requirements.
X X X X
X X X X
X
X X X X X
X X X X X
X X X X X
3.0 1.7, 1.8 Welding specific essential variables which shall be addressed in the
FMEA, control plan and welding procedures
Equipment
C3.1 Beam quality X X
C3.2 Optic cleanliness X X
C3.3 Cross jet or laser knife X X
C3.4 Beam configuration (split, single) X X
C3.5 Focal length X X
C3.6 Beam spot size X X
C3.7 Gas tube angle/arrangement X X
C3.8 Optics purge gas (flow and quality) X
C3.9 Mirror cleanliness X X
C3.10 Mirror degradation X X
C3.11 Beam sharing X X
C3.12 Split beam X X
C3.13 Tip changes
C3.14 O rings in gas system
With Wire
Feed
DIODE System
(LBW)
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PROCESS TABLE C- Laser Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify wel
is conforming to the customer's requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
Beam Delivery
C3.33 Direct
C3.34 Fiber X
C3.35 - Fiber diameter X
C3.36 - Fiber lengths X
C3.37 - Bend radius X
C3.38 - Condition of fiber X
C3.39 - Fiber ends (condition of fiber ends) X
C3.40 - Fiber end cooling X
C3.41 Mirror X
C3.42 - Power loss though the delivery system X
C3.43 - Alignment X
C3.44 - Cleanliness X
C3.45 - Coatings of mirror X
C3.46 - Mirror type X
C3.47 - Optic and mirror cooling X
Process Variables
C3.48 Shielding gas type - flow rate X X
C3.49 Weld travel speed control (rate of change, and velocity X X
control)
C3.50 Power Output Control X X
C3.51 Power ramping/program (start, weld, end) X X
C3.52 Power at the work piece X X
esses
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify wel
is conforming to the customer's requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
PROCESS TABLE D - Solid State Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify wel
customer's requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
4.0 1.7, 1.8 Welding specific essential variables which shall be addressed in the
FMEA, control plan and welding procedures
preheat
Weld Heat (Second friction phase)
D4.15 -Friction weld force X X
D4.16 -Friction speed at which forging begins X X
he job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is conforming to the
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify wel
customer's requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
Forging Stage
D4.17 -Forging speed X X
D4.18 -Forge force X X
D4.19 -Forge time X
D4.20 -Forge length if limited upset is used X
D4.21 -Forge delay X
D4.22 -Upset distance X
D4.23 -Upset removal / management X X
D4.24 -Upset hold time X X
D4.25 -Upset rate X X
D4.26 -Friction upset distance and time X
D4.27 Brake setting or stopping time dimensions and tolerences X
D4.28 Brake force X
D4.29 Brake delay prior to upset X
D4.30 Final position X
D4.31 Postweld heat treatment if needed based on materials joined
X X
PROCESS TABLE D - Solid State Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is confo
requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
FSW
D4.34 Primary control (position or force) X
D4.35 Tool to weld joint alignment during length of travel X
Tool
D4.36 -Pin to shoulder ratio X
D4.37 -Pin length X
D4.38 -Included angle for pin X
D4.39 -Included angle for shoulder X
D4.40 -Thread on pin surface X
D4.41 -Pin material X
Plunge Practice
D4.42 -Speed of plunge X
D4.43 -Spindal speed during plunge X
D4.44 -Preheat dwell time after plunge X
D4.45 -Plunge force X
Weld
D4.46 -Weld force X
D4.47 -Travel speed X
D4.48 -Tool tilt angle X
D4.49 -Weld spindal speed X
Weld termination
D4.50 -Exit motion of tool such as tilt angle rotation X
D4.51 -Spindal speed at tool extraction X
D4.52 -Dwell at end of travel X
rocesses
d when necessary.
FBW RBW
D4.53 Electrode design-eliminate die burns
D4.54 Electrode/Die cleanliness
D4.55 Electrode/Die clamping pressure
D4.56 Part cleanliness and scale removal
D4.57 Part alignment
D4.58 Joint geometry preporation
D4.59 Initial martial stickout or extension beyond electrodes
Preheat
D4.60 -Preheat force
D4.61 -Tap selection
D4.62 -Percent heat
D4.63 -Off time during initial die opening
Initial Flashing
D4.64 -Initial die opening
D4.65 -Initial flashing rate
D4.66 -Type of platten movement (linear or parabolic)
D4.67 -Voltage
D4.68 -Initial flashing distance or time
D4.69 -Percent heat
D4.70 -Tap selection
uditor shall verify welding is conforming to the customer's
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PROCESS TABLE D - Solid State Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is confo
requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled.
indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
Flashing
D4.71 -Flashing rate
D4.72 -Type of platten movement (linear or parabolic)
D4.73 -Voltage
D4.74 -Flashing distance or time
D4.75 -Percent heat
D4.76 -Tap selection
Weld Stage 1
D4.77 -Percent heat
D4.78 -Tap selection voltage
D4.79 -Force
D4.80 -Pulsation (on, off and number of pulses)
D4.81 -Off time before stage change
Weld Stage 2 (can be multiple stages with different parameters)
D4.82 -Percent heat
D4.83 -Tap selection voltage
D4.84 -Force
D4.85 -Pulsation (on, off and number of pulses)
rocesses
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PROCESS TABLE D - Solid State Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is confo
requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled.
indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
Forge/Upset
D4.86 -Forge rate
D4.87 -Forge force
D4.88 -Forge distance / total upset
D4.89 -Upset time
D4.90 -Upset current
D4.91 -Flashing voltage cut off
D4.92 -Flashing removal / management
Post weld heat treatment if needed
D4.93 -Heat treatment clamping distance
D4.94 -Quench time
D4.95 -Tap selection
D4.96 -Precent heat
D4.97 -Temper time
D4.98 Final die opening
Ultrasonic Metal weld
D4.99 Tap selection / design of ribbon structure
D4.100 Frequency of power supply for application (40/30/20kHz)
D4.101 Fixture & part design with max dimension deviation and material specs
rocesses
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
PROCESS TABLE D - Solid State Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is confo
requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
d when necessary.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PROCESS TABLE D - Solid State Welding Processes
All control of variables given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify wel
customer's requirements.
Dashes below indicate "not applicable".
X indicates an essential variable which shall be documented and controlled. indicates that procedure should be reviewed and documented when necessary.
- 48 -
GLOSSARY
See also AWS A3.0: welding terms and definitions AIAG – Automotive Industry Action Group
AWS American Welding Society
ANSI American National Standard Institute
Capability – The total range of inherent variation in a stable process.
Control Plans – Written descriptions of the system for controlling processes for production of parts or bulk materials.
Plans are written by organizations to address the important characteristics and engineering requirements of the product
must have a Control Plan, but in many cases, “family” Control Plans can apply to a number of parts produced using a c
process.
Critical Spare Parts List – A list of service parts critical for the operation of equipment. Extended delay in obtaining
would result in unacceptable delays in the welding operation.
Cross-Functional Team – A team of employees that represent the different functions within an organization. The team
typically consist of an operator, line supervision, process engineer, metallurgist, and quality personnel.
Customer – The recipient of the organization's or supplier’s product or service.
Customer Requirements – This term refers to the requirements or specifications from the original equipment manufa
(typically the automobile company). These may be identified in the contract or purchase order, in engineering standard
specifications, etc.
Inter-Lock – A method of preventing missed steps within the operations by putting controls on how an operation can b
in order to force the correct completion of the operation.
Nonconforming Product – Product that does not conform to the customer requirements.
Process Tables – Tables in the WSA that list the required process controls for the welding processes covered. These t
minimum requirements.
Reprocessing – Any process that is performed on nonconforming product so that it will meet the specified requiremen
Responsibility Matrix – A responsibility matrix defines the designated personnel for all key functions. This matrix inc
primary and secondary designees.
Robust – A stable predictive outcome regardless of variation within operating window; able to withstand its environm
to failure.
SAE International – Society of Automotive Engineers International
Shop Traveler – A document usually created in the receiving department for each batch or lot of parts received. The d
defines the process routing of the parts.
Special Characteristics – are product characteristics or manufacturing process parameters which can affect safety or c
with regulations, fit, function, performance or subsequent processing of product. Refer to customer-specific requireme
WSA - Welding System Assessment
Work Instructions – Instructions that describe work conducted in one function in a company, e.g., setup, inspection, w
operation, process parameter tolerances, etc. The term “work instructions” is
synonymous with the term “job instructions.”
- 50 -
MAINTENANCE REQUEST FORM
Name of Submitter: Date:
Company:
Company Address:
MAINTENANCE REQUEST
Page Number of Change:
Signature of Submitter:
Final Disposition:
Comments:
Note: Complete form and return to the AIAG Publication Specialist for consideration.
Automotive Industry Action Group • 26200 Lahser Road • Suite 200 • Southfield, MI 48033 Telephone: (248) 358-3570 • Fax: (248) 35
he job audit, the auditor shall verify welding is conforming to the
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
s.
tion Group
s.
ding processes covered. These tables contain
- 49 -
mpany, e.g., setup, inspection, welding
ne: (248) 358-3570 • Fax: (248) 358-3253Web: [Link]
- 51 -